(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Similar Documents at Byron |
---|
Category:INTERVENTION PETITIONS
MONTHYEARML20092H9591984-06-0707 June 1984 Forwards Proposed Financial Qualification Contention.Const Cannot Be Completed in Manner Resulting in Safe Plant. Evacuation Plan Will Be Terrible Financial Burden.Served on 840625 ML20024A1201983-02-21021 February 1983 Amend & Consolidation of Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 3 & Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 19 & 108 ML20024A1181983-02-21021 February 1983 Motion to Amend & Consolidate Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 3 W/Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 19 & 108 ML20062B0591982-07-30030 July 1982 Need for Power & Alternative Energy Source Contention ML20062B0471982-07-30030 July 1982 Financial Qualifications Contention ML20054C6741982-04-15015 April 1982 Revised Contentions 10-12.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19310A1801980-05-0909 May 1980 Supplemented Statement of Contentions Alleging Lack of Technical Qualifications to Operate Station.Dose Impacts of Projected Routine Releases of Radioactive Matls Should Be re-evaluated.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19323C6711980-04-18018 April 1980 Response to Rockford League of Women Voters Revised Contentions.Urges Admission of Contentions 50,85,104,112(d) & 119(a)(b),consolidation of Contentions 2,5,88,90 & 116 & Rejection of Remaining Contentions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20028B9861980-03-10010 March 1980 Revised Contentions.Ols Should Be Denied 1984-06-07
[Table view] Category:RESPONSES & CONTENTIONS
MONTHYEARML20092H9591984-06-0707 June 1984 Forwards Proposed Financial Qualification Contention.Const Cannot Be Completed in Manner Resulting in Safe Plant. Evacuation Plan Will Be Terrible Financial Burden.Served on 840625 ML20024A1201983-02-21021 February 1983 Amend & Consolidation of Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 3 & Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 19 & 108 ML20024A1181983-02-21021 February 1983 Motion to Amend & Consolidate Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 3 W/Rockford League of Women Voters Contentions 19 & 108 ML20062B0591982-07-30030 July 1982 Need for Power & Alternative Energy Source Contention ML20062B0471982-07-30030 July 1982 Financial Qualifications Contention ML20054C6741982-04-15015 April 1982 Revised Contentions 10-12.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19310A1801980-05-0909 May 1980 Supplemented Statement of Contentions Alleging Lack of Technical Qualifications to Operate Station.Dose Impacts of Projected Routine Releases of Radioactive Matls Should Be re-evaluated.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19323C6711980-04-18018 April 1980 Response to Rockford League of Women Voters Revised Contentions.Urges Admission of Contentions 50,85,104,112(d) & 119(a)(b),consolidation of Contentions 2,5,88,90 & 116 & Rejection of Remaining Contentions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20028B9861980-03-10010 March 1980 Revised Contentions.Ols Should Be Denied 1984-06-07
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20149M2951996-11-29029 November 1996 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 Re Safety Margins Recommended in ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Case N-514 TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20059C2351993-12-17017 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20044A8111990-06-27027 June 1990 Comment Opposing Closure of Lpdr of Rockford Public Library ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20214X1871987-06-11011 June 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Based on Four Severity Level III Violations Noted During 860721-0808 Insp ML20205Q1711987-04-0202 April 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000. App Re Evaluations & Conclusions Encl IR 05000812/20100311987-02-26026 February 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $100,000 Based on Violations Noted During Insps on 850812-1031 ML20210T7321987-02-11011 February 1987 Unexecuted Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-97 Substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Indemnity Agreement in Entirety W/ Listed License Numbers,Effective 870130 ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20213G4381986-10-24024 October 1986 Unexecuted Amend 5 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Agreement in Entirety W/Listed License Numbers,Effective on 861106 ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 IR 05000506/20070221986-05-0202 May 1986 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 for Violations Noted During Insp on 850506-0722.Violations Noted:Failure to Establish Radiological Safety Procedures & to Adequately Train Personnel ML20138C7301985-12-0909 December 1985 Order Imposing Civil Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Per 850606 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty.Licensee May Request Hearing within 30 Days of Date of Order ML20205E8741985-10-28028 October 1985 Exemption from GDC 4 of 10CFR50,App a Requirement to Install Protective Devices Associated W/Postulated Pipe Breaks Primary Coolant Sys.Topical Rept Evaluation Encl ML20102A2981985-01-0707 January 1985 Petition Requesting Aslab Grant Intervenor Appeal & Order Further Hearings on Safety of Plant ML20099L2581984-11-27027 November 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20099G5381984-11-23023 November 1984 Supplemental Appeal Brief in Response to Intervenor 841106 Supplemental Brief on Appeal & in Support of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Ol. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20100K0411984-11-22022 November 1984 Submits Concerns Re Safety of Local Residents in Event of Accident & Excessively High Cost of Projected Operation of Facility ML20107H7841984-11-0606 November 1984 Supplemental Brief on Appeal of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Granting Authority for Issuance of Ol. Decision Should Be Reversed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20140E4081984-10-31031 October 1984 Executed Amend 1 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,deleting Items 2A & 3 in Entirety ML20098G8841984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of RW Manz & W Faires Re Findings 3-11 Through 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098G8681984-10-0202 October 1984 Answer to Intervenor Motion to Reopen Record Re Bechtel Independent Design Review.Motion Should Be Denied ML20098G8901984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Kj Green & RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8911984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Cw Dick & EM Hughes Re Independent Design Insp ML20098G8821984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Kj Green Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Mechanical Engineering Work ML20098G8741984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Br Shelton Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8881984-09-29029 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Structural Design ML20098G8831984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of W Faires Re Findings 3-15 & 3-16 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept ML20098G8811984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of Cw Dick Re Independent Design Review ML20098G8791984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RP Tuetken Re Readiness for Fuel Loading ML20098G8781984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Manz Concerning Findings 3-11 Through 3-14 & 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Re Westinghouse ML20098G8871984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of EM Hughes Re Idvp ML20098G8851984-09-27027 September 1984 Affidavit of Rl Heumann Re Costs of Delay in Startup & Operation of Unit 1 ML20098E2371984-09-24024 September 1984 Reply to Intervenor 840918 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097E7221984-09-13013 September 1984 Agreed Motion for Time Extension Until 841101 to File Petition for Hearing Re Emergency Planning Commitment W ML20097C5311984-09-12012 September 1984 Motion to Reopen Record to Include Plant Design as Issue. Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097B7791984-09-10010 September 1984 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision Re Reinsp Program. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6441984-08-28028 August 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Related Correspondence ML20112D5271984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-4,consisting of Feb 1984 Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D5031984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-5,consisting of June 1984 Suppl to Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D7441984-08-23023 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-1,consisting of Undated List of Teutken Safety Category Insp Types ML20112D7511984-08-21021 August 1984 Staff Exhibit S-R-1,consisting of 840813 Instruction for Walkdown of Cable Tray Hanger Connection Welds ML20112D4641984-08-21021 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-11,consisting of Undated Chronological Date Listing of Util Responses to Interrogatory 12.VA Judson to Mi Miller Re Interrogatory 12 & Supplemental Responses Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] |
Text
i
'=-
Sinnissippi Allianco for the Environmant 326 Noch Avon Street Rockforc, Illinois 61103 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA -
S /
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-454
) 50-455 COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO., )
)
Syron Station )
(Units No. 1 and No. 2) 4 b
DAARE/ SAFE'S REVISED CONTENTIONa 2 (April 15, 1982) [ ~.
hi ,. ' c 31902 F'" , 57.
- 9. o ,.o T '
Contention10- /' )N
' /
r The Byron FSAR and SER contain inadequate assurance that Commonwealth Edison will maintain occupational exposures as low as is reasonably achievable, as required by 10 CFR Part 20. The assessment of collective radiation dose to workers from plant operations as described in section 12.4 of the FSAR is not con-sistent with the acceptance criteria in NUREG-0800, or ALARA, in-j sofar as the applicant's assessment 1s not based on an analysis
'of the tasks involved in the operation of the plant, the ex-l pected radiation dose rates, and the personnel required to per-i form those tasks", but upon an averaging of dosages recievod_during I
se'_ected activities at other plants; despite the following:
- a. Edison's program regarding occupational radiation exposure presently relies upon use of transient and temporary work-ers to minimize allowable radiation exposures to individ-ual workers to meet regulatory limits, 5o3
- b. Edison's occupational radiation exposure program does not provide for the recording of cumulative exposures which /D workers may receive at Byron and at other nuclear facilit-ies:
8204210489 820415 PDR ADOCK 05000454 G PDR
7 t.-
e
- c. Edison does not attempt to minimize occupational exposures to radiation as much as possible by basing work assignments in high risk areas upon factors such as individual volunt-eerism and assignments given to individuals with the least demonstrable suseptibility in age and health'to radiation effectss -
- d. Edison's plant design does not take into account new evid-ence regarding the dangers of exposure to low levels cf radiation; and,
- e. The Byron plant contains inadequate monitoring instrument-ation of sufficient quanity and sensitivity to detect var-iations of radiation; particularly alpha, beta, and gamma radiation.
Applicant should be required to reassess it's program regard-1 ing occupational radiation exposure and institute corrective action to include the above factors in it's program.
Contention 11 The turbine-generator placement and orientation at the Eyrron Units 1 and 2, as identified in SER, 3-10, are unfavorable rela-tive to station reactor buildings. Systems important to safety have been demonstrated to lie "inside the low trajectory missile strike zone." (Regulatory guide 1.115) This warrants relocation of the turbine-generator placement and alteration of it's exist-ing orientation.
1 Contention 12 Task Action Plan B-57 identifies the potential safety prob-lems associated with loss of off-site and AC power. In the etent of loss of off-site power at the Byron plant, the FSAR and S E.:.
demonstrate several failure possibilities in the conversion t0 alternative power systems due to Edison's reliance upon the fel-lowing inadequate power components. Several inadvertant and/ r unrelated failures in these components in the resultant power re-
7 W
duction and systems interaction could render it impossible to oper-ate simulteneously the neccessary emergency equipment and safety systems components required to maintain safe reactor shut-down margins under Design Basis Criteria.
- a. Applicant's reliance upon Storage OC Battery units for AC replacement which are subject to time constraints on oper-ability;
- b. Applicant's reliance upon diesel generator coolant pumps; units which, as has yet to be determined, may be possibly defective units manufactured by the Heywood-Taylor Pump Co, now the subject of an investigation by NRC Region IV Office; these units may fail simultaneously; Certificate of Service The undersigned, a member of DAARE/ SAFE certifies that on this date, April 15, 1982, she served copies of these Revised Contentions on each member of the Service List, by Special Del-ivery, Regular U.S. Mail, or by other means as neccessary, i
}
I i ,
l *
- r. m., s .n - y Diane Chaven, DAARE/ SAFE Date: April 15, 1982 ene: Service List 4
i
. .___ _ - _. . ,_ ,