ML100539608

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:40, 13 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
DAEC 2009 Examination OP-Test Review Comments
ML100539608
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 09/21/2009
From:
Operations Branch III
To:
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold
References
Download: ML100539608 (4)
v • d • e


Text

DAEC 2009 EXAMINATION OP TEST REVIEW & VALIDATION COMMENTS GENERIC COMMENTS

1. For all JPM Performance Steps include procedure step number. comment incorporated
2. For all Initiating Cues: Make cue a command or order instead of The CRS directs you to..; comment incorporated
3. Add appropriate ES-D-1 page to each scenario.; ES-D-1 pages will be included with examiner copies on simulator exam days.

RO ADMIN TOPICS

1. RO JPM A-1
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • Add step to record reason in remarks (7.1.1 a.)
  • Why two columns under ACTUAL? What goes in the second column?; checks use to be performed on each shift
  • For performance step 1, does the applicant have to find all 5 problems to be sat?

Do all five issues have regulatory significance if not identified? two of the five criteria identified as critical.

  • For performance step 2, standard should be simply to notify the CRS. ; comment incorporated
2. RO JPM A-2
  • INTIAL CONDITIONS - Is the second bullet really necessary?; second bullet deleted
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • Performance step 1 - Should be CRITICAL. Cant complete task without entering IV command. ; comment incorporated; also note added regarding procedure reference
  • Is there any requirement to perform a Channel Check of the computer point after being returned to service? If so, add a non-critical step to perform the channel check.; channel check not required
3. RO JPM A-3
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • Add an Evaluator Note to step 11 stating that applicants may mark Acceptance Criteria step 8.3.2 as NO per note preceding step 7.2.13.; note added to step
  • In procedure copy provided to applicants the appropriate data should be plotted on Attachments 1-3. ; comment incorporated
  • Evaluate including Sections 7.4 and 8.; evaluated as unnecessary
  • Provide an acceptable range for recorded and calculate values. ; comment incorporated
  • With acceptable ranges added it may be possible, depending on how accurately the applicant reads the indications, that the data point for Jet Pump 14 may fall outside the acceptable range; Evaluator note added to step 11 identifying the possibility and to indicate that this would not be part of the acceptance standard.
4. RO JPM A-4
  • INITIATING CUE - Change to read: Enter and when prompted by the evaluator, exit the simulated contamination area while adhering to the requirements of the provided RWP and any general radiological controls. ; comment incorporated
  • Performance step 1 - Include protective clothing requirements in RWP. Change Standard to Reviews RWP and determines PC requirements, dosimetry requirements, alarm settings; comment not incorporated; this would not be in accordance with station practices; Examiner will act as the RP briefer
  • RWP - include job steps or tasks.; included
  • Performance step 10 - on setup either turn frisker OFF or set range on higher scale.; frisker will be turned OFF SRO ADMIN TOPICS
1. SRO A-1
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete: You are directed to ; comment incorporated
  • Why havent pages 25-28 been included? All pages to be completed
  • Performance Step Standards -- Include completion time requirements in TS LCO references; completion times added as requested
2. SRO A-2
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete: As the Shift Manager, I am directing you (the CRS) to; and and sign..discrepancies. ; comment incorporated
  • Add step(s) to complete LCO tracking (Attachment 1 of ACP 1410.2); this task is tested in the new SR0 A-3 JPM
  • INTIAL CONDITION change on shift as the CRS to an OFF watch SRO; comment incorporated
  • Performance Step 1 standard - change Ready for S/U signature to Reviewed By ; comment incorporated
3. SRO A-3; original JPM replaced
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete: The Shift Manager has directed you to ; comment incorporated
  • Is there a procedure reference for performing risk assessment?
  • Select different system/component to remove any uncertainty related to completion of tracking paper work; ; comment incorporated
4. SRO A-4
  • Delete performance step 10; deleted
  • Dose rates on Attachment adjusted per NRC validator request.
5. SRO A-5
  • Evaluate moving Fuel Damage Assessment information to Since the General Emergency has been declared..; comment incorporated
  • Separate Turnover Sheet into 2; one for initial conditions including the initial NOTE-05 form; 2nd to outline changes since the initial declaration. ; comment incorporated
  • Provide completed checklists that would have been completed by the SM up to the current time.
  • What is time critical; when does clock start and when does it stop? Two separate clocks, one for determining the need for change, and one for making notification.; time critical elements identified
  • Comments on NOTE-05 should include adverse weather conditions. ; comment incorporated

CONTROL ROOM/IN-PLANT SYSTEMS - ES-301-2

1. JPM S-1
  • During setup ensure that procedure steps 3.3 (1) through (6) are complete and annotated as such. ; comment incorporated
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • INITIATING CUE - Add beginning at step (7) after Section 3.3 ; comment incorporated
  • Delete Performance Steps 1-7 and renumber accordingly. ; comment incorporated
  • Do we need to inform the applicant of the time critical element (Step 3.3 (9));

NO

2. JPM S-2
  • INTIATING CUE - You are directed to ; comment incorporated
  • INTIATING CUE - Add using the B Core Spray Pump to end of first bullet step and delete second bullet step. ; comment incorporated
  • Why specify use of QRC? Either could be used without changing Critical Steps.;

QRC is preferred under these conditions; initiating cue revised to include direction to use QRC

  • Correct valve number error in step 3; comment incorporated
3. JPM S-3
  • INITIAL CONDITIONS - Delete last bullet (Master FRV in AUTO) ; comment incorporated
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • Revise Task Standards for S/U FRV Controller to simply be in MANUAL; comment incorporated
  • Add evaluator note to step 10 on how Master FRV controller fails; comment incorporated
4. JPM S-4
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • Mark Performance Step 12 as Critical. ; comment incorporated
  • Will applicant see a change in containment pressure? If so JPM should not be terminated until after applicant demonstrates ability to maintain band. ; comment incorporated
  • Change evaluator cue in step 22 to remove direction to secure venting. This decision should be left up to the applicant.
5. JPM S-5
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • Performance Step 6 and 14 - Procedure step reference in Standard is incorrect.; corrected
  • Change step 9 to a critical step; comment incorporated
6. JPM S-6
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • Terminate JPM at Performance Step 14; steps added to return APRMs to as found condition (i.e., C in service and A in bypass)
  • Add procedure step 6.1(1) sub-steps to Performance step 3; comment incorporated
7. JPM S-7
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • Why not verify actions at Tip Panel 1C13?; actions added
  • Add step to setup to ensure Indexer is as 0000; comment incorporated
  • Change performance step 1 to not critical; comment incorporated
8. JPM S-8
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
9. JPM P-1
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to; comment incorporated
  • Performance step 15 - Step may or may not be critical depending on actual plant configuration; evaluator note added addressing criticality of step based on actual plant configuration.
  • Panel labels in Figure 3 are unreadable; figure modified to make labels legible.
10. JPM P-2
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated
  • Performance step 15 - should be critical to not close pilot valve before time limit; step changed to critical step and evaluator note added explaining what is critical
11. JPM P-3
  • INITIATING CUE - Delete The CRS directs you to ; comment incorporated SCENARIOS
1. Scenario 1
  • Event 3 - Provide bulleted list of actions RO takes to reset scram
  • Event 4 - RO: Refers to ARP and shifts CRD pumps per OI-255
  • Event 6 - Starting ESW is an immediate action per AOP408
  • Scenario Termination - Event Classification is not required. Scenario may be terminated when level is being controlled, not just restored. ; comment incorporated
2. Scenario 2
  • Event 6 - This same event/malfunction was used on 2007 exam (I missed this during outline review).
  • May not need event 4 due to power reduction for RR High vibration.
  • Event 7 - Does RR pump trip automatically? If not, shouldnt crew scram reactor before tripping RR Pump?
  • Scenario Termination - Event Classification is not required. ; comment incorporated
3. Scenario 3
  • Scenario Termination - Event Classification is not required. ; comment incorporated
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML100539608&oldid=2136931"