Letter Sequence Request |
|---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance, Acceptance
- Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement
|
MONTHYEARRS-09-074, License Amendment Request to Modify Clinton Power Station Facility Operating License in Support of the Use of Isotope Test Assemblies2009-06-26026 June 2009
License Amendment Request to Modify Clinton Power Station Facility Operating License in Support of the Use of Isotope Test Assemblies
Project stage: Request
ML1013903182009-11-15015 November 2009
Calculation 80096650, Revision 0, Leakage Reduction Program Calculation, Attachment 6 to LR-N10-0163
Project stage: Request
RS-09-171, Supplemental Information Supporting the Request for a License Amendment to Modify Operating License in Support of the Use of Lsotope Test Assemblies2009-12-14014 December 2009
Supplemental Information Supporting the Request for a License Amendment to Modify Operating License in Support of the Use of Lsotope Test Assemblies
Project stage: Supplement
ML0936401982009-12-21021 December 2009
Hope Creek Generating Station - License Amendment Request Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)
Project stage: Other
LR-N09-0290, NEDO-33529, Rev. 0, Safety Analysis Report to Support Introduction of GE14i Isotope Test Assemblies (Itas) in Hope Creek Generating Station2009-12-31031 December 2009
NEDO-33529, Rev. 0, Safety Analysis Report to Support Introduction of GE14i Isotope Test Assemblies (Itas) in Hope Creek Generating Station
Project stage: Request
ML1002800042010-01-28028 January 2010
Acceptance Review for TAC ME2949 - Hope Creek - License Amendment Request Regarding Use of ITAs for Cobalt-60 Production
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML1002907322010-01-28028 January 2010
Draft Request for Additional Information
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML1002607732010-02-0404 February 2010
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Hope Creek Generating Station
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML1009205472010-03-16016 March 2010
Comment (1) of William E. Morris on Pseg'S Plan to Produce Cobalt-60 Which Can Be Used to Promote and Maintain Human Health
Project stage: Request
ML1009205482010-03-25025 March 2010
Comment (2) of William H. Day Supporting Proposal to Produce Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek
Project stage: Request
ML1009205492010-03-26026 March 2010
Comment (4) of David A. Lochbaum on Behalf of Union of Concerned Scientists on the Proposal of PSEG to Load Cobalt-60 Producing Rods in Reactor Core at Hope Creek
Project stage: Request
ML1009701262010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (3) of 243 Individuals Regarding Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order
Project stage: Request
ML1009500372010-04-0101 April 2010
Comment (5) of Leigh Davis, Dena Jaborska, Wenonah Hauter, Amy Goldsmith, Jeff Tittel, William Kibler, Jennifer Coffey & Norm Cohen on Behalf of Food & Water Watch Opposing Proposal of PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Produce Cobalt-60 at H
Project stage: Request
ML1009904032010-04-0808 April 2010
Draft Request for Additional Information
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML1011701132010-04-0909 April 2010
License Amendment Request H09-01 Supporting the Use of Cobalt-60 Isotope Test Assemblies
Project stage: Request
LR-N10-0163, Response to Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)2010-05-11011 May 2010
Response to Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML1013303612010-06-0303 June 2010
Letter Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Hope Creek Generating Station
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
LR-N10-0210, Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies2010-06-10010 June 2010
Response to Request for Additional Information, License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies
Project stage: Response to RAI
LR-N10-0217, Supplemental Safety Analysis Report Information - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)2010-06-24024 June 2010
Supplemental Safety Analysis Report Information - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)
Project stage: Supplement
ML1017600102010-06-24024 June 2010
Draft Request for Additional Information
Project stage: Draft RAI
ML1016600492010-07-0202 July 2010
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Hope Creek Generating Station
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML1018303302010-07-14014 July 2010
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Hope Creek Generating Station
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
LR-N10-0289, Response to Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)2010-07-28028 July 2010
Response to Request for Additional Information - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML1024400262010-08-18018 August 2010
Letter in Regard to License Amendment Request H09-01 Supporting the Use of Cobalt-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Program)
Project stage: Request
ML1023903302010-09-0909 September 2010
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Hope Creek Generating Station
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML1023903432010-09-0909 September 2010
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure for Hope Creek Generating Station
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
LR-N10-0341, Supplement - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)2010-09-10010 September 2010
Supplement - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)
Project stage: Supplement
LR-N10-0357, Supplement - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)2010-09-17017 September 2010
Supplement - License Amendment Request (H09-01) Supporting the Use of Co-60 Isotope Test Assemblies (Isotope Generation Pilot Project)
Project stage: Supplement
ML1027100322010-09-28028 September 2010
Transmittal of Draft Safety Evaluation for Proposed Amendment Use of Isotope Test Assemblies for Cobalt-60 Production
Project stage: Draft Approval
ML1027002712010-10-0707 October 2010
License Amendment, Use of Isotope Test Assemblies for Cobalt-60 Production
Project stage: Acceptance Review
ML1027101562010-10-0707 October 2010
Safety Evaluation, Related to Amendment No. 184 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-057
Project stage: Approval
2010-04-08
[Table View] |
|
|---|
Category:General FR Notice Comment Letter
MONTHYEARML24212A1312024-07-29029 July 2024
Comment (71) of Mary Quinn on Holtec Decommissioning International, LLC, and Holtec Palisades, LLC; Palisades Nuclear Plant; Notice of Intent to Conduct Scoping Process and Prepare an Environmental Assessment
ML15138A1032015-04-29029 April 2015
Comment (1) of Christine Arnott Opposing Behalf of Delaware River Keeper on Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses and Combined Licenses Involving No Significant Hazards Considerations
ML14356A1862014-12-16016 December 2014
Comment (26) of an Individual Opposing on Hope Creek and Salem Expanding Nuclear Power Facilities
ML11266A1502011-09-21021 September 2011
Comment (6) of Christi Demark Opposed to the Proposal by PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Product Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek Generating Station
ML1100602872010-12-16016 December 2010
Comment (5) of Grace Musumeci, on Behalf of Us Environmental Protection Agency, Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal of Nuclear Plants, Draft Supplement 45 Regarding Hope Creek and Salem Units 1 & 2
ML1032300472010-11-0808 November 2010
Comment (1) of Stephen M. Sweeney on Behalf of New Jersey Senate, Supporting Pseg'S Application to Construct a New Nuclear Generating Facility in Salem County
ML1035104262010-11-0505 November 2010
Comment (1) of Marv Lewis on Proposal to Extend the Operating Life of Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plant Along with the Salem Units 1 & 2 by 20 Years Reeks with Betrayal of Responsibility to Protect the Public
ML1009500372010-04-0101 April 2010
Comment (5) of Leigh Davis, Dena Jaborska, Wenonah Hauter, Amy Goldsmith, Jeff Tittel, William Kibler, Jennifer Coffey & Norm Cohen on Behalf of Food & Water Watch Opposing Proposal of PSEG to Start a Pilot Project to Produce Cobalt-60 at H
ML1009205462010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Re-Licensing of Columbia Generating Station
ML1009701262010-03-31031 March 2010
Comment (3) of 243 Individuals Regarding Notice; Applications and Amendments to Facility Operating Licenses Involving Proposed No Significant Hazards Considerations and Containing Sensitive Unclassified Non-Safeguards Information and Order
ML1009205492010-03-26026 March 2010
Comment (4) of David A. Lochbaum on Behalf of Union of Concerned Scientists on the Proposal of PSEG to Load Cobalt-60 Producing Rods in Reactor Core at Hope Creek
ML1009205482010-03-25025 March 2010
Comment (2) of William H. Day Supporting Proposal to Produce Cobalt-60 at Hope Creek
ML1009205472010-03-16016 March 2010
Comment (1) of William E. Morris on Pseg'S Plan to Produce Cobalt-60 Which Can Be Used to Promote and Maintain Human Health
ML1022805622009-11-30030 November 2009
Comment (8) of Norm Cohen, on Behalf of the Unplug Salem Campaign, on Environmental Review of the Relicensing of Hope Creek
ML1022805552009-11-0404 November 2009
Comment (1) of John D. Greenhill on Behalf of Himself Regarding Salem and Hope Nuclear Plants 20 Year License Extensions
ML1022805592009-11-0303 November 2009
Comment (5) of Ellen B. Pompper, on Behalf of Self, Supporting PSEG Nuclear'S License Renewal for Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations
ML1022805572009-10-24024 October 2009
Comment (3) of David O. Rickards on Behalf of Instream Energy, LLC Re Hearing on Salem/Hope Creek Nuclear Plant
ML1022805562009-09-0707 September 2009
Comment (2) of Sidney J. Goodman Opposing on License Renewal for the Salem and Hope Creek Nuclear Power Plants
ML1022805612009-09-0303 September 2009
Comment (7) of William R. Dunn, Supporting Salem and Hope Creek License Renewal Applications
ML0719402422007-06-0101 June 2007
Comment (1) of Patrick Mulligan on Behalf of New Jersey Dept. of Environmental Protection Bureau of Nuclear Engineering, Regarding Hope Creek License Change Request (LCR) H05-01 Extended Power Uprate
ML0436200752004-12-10010 December 2004
Comment (10) of Jill Lipoti on Solicitation of Public Comments on the Implementation of the Reactor Oversight Process, Dated October 25, 2004
2024-07-29
[Table view] |
Text
o UNITED STATES "s' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 3
(2/ ".9 J-ý.
~->~y--c 9 3 6(-9,3 cl-c-111- =-
5,21315 ('ex'ZE-7) ,
/o 5'1ý te-l- (-?qLx /--ý F)
3/16/10 To: Chief, rulemaking and Directives Branch Division of Administrative Services U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington D.C. 20555-0001 I salute PSEG for their plan to produce Cobalt-60 which can be used to promote and maintain our health.
It is interesting that Cobalt-60 was involved in an accidental but very important experiment in Taiwan. Cobalt-60 was accidentally mixed with steel which was made into reinforcing rods used in constructing apartments. The mistake was discovered 15 years later, and it was found that apartment
- occupants had.,received radiation doses averaging 7400 millirems per year. This is 20 times the average dose of 350 millirems per year that Americans receive.
A survey of about 10,000 apartment occupants-showed a cancer rate of only 3% of the rate for those who receive an average radiation dOse. This means that concerns about low level radiation are comfpletely-unjustified.
The medical use of Cobalt-60 and other nuclear power by-products is a bonus for us, over and above the use of nuclear power.
I have no pecuniary'inter6st in any company involved in nuclear power.
William E. Morris (302) 475-7060 2124 Brandywood Drive Wilmington DE 19810
Reference:
Feder.al Register 3/2/10 pages 9445-9449
..- , . O p..aes
...................... [
