L-2013-076, Submittal of 2012 Annual Fitness for Duty Performance Report

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:54, 4 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submittal of 2012 Annual Fitness for Duty Performance Report
ML13071A414
Person / Time
Site: Turkey Point  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 02/25/2013
From: Kiley M
Florida Power & Light Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
L-2013-076
Download: ML13071A414 (6)


Text

'p 0 FEB 2 5 2013 FPL.

10 CFR 26.717 L-2013-076 U.S Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn.: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555-0001 Re: Turkey Point Units 3 and 4 Docket Nos. 50-250 and 50-251 2012 Annual Fitness for Duty Performance Report Attached is the Annual Fitness for Duty Performance Report for the period of January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2012, for Turkey Point Units 3 and 4, as required by 10 CFR 26.717(e).

The Turkey Point Fitness for Duty Program uses a random testing rate of at least 50%.

Attachment 1 contains the Fitness for Duty Program performance data, as well as, a list of events reported and a summary of any management actions taken. Attachment 2 contains the Annual Fatigue Management Summary as required by 10 CFR Part 26.203(e).

Should there be any questions or comments regarding this information, please contact Robert J.

Tomonto at 305-246-7327.

Very truly yours, Michael Kiley Vice President Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Attachment cc: Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Florida Power & Light Company 9760 SW 344 St Homestead, FL 33035

Attachment I to L-2013-076 Page 1 of 3 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA Florida Power & Light Co 2012 Company Annual Reporting Period Turkey Point Nuclear Plant Location James E. Denton (305) 246-7171 Contact Name Phone Number Cutoffs: Screen/Confirmation (ng/ml) & Alcohol (% BAC)

X 10 CFR 26 Levels identified in Sections 26.103 and 26.163 Testing Results Licensee Employees Contractor Personnel Average number with Unescorted Access 1119 4279 Total: 5409 Categories Tested Positive Tested Positive Follow-Up 38 0 431 2 For Cause -

Observed Behavior 0 0 5 3 For Cause -

Post Event 0 0 41. 0 Pre-Access 192 0 4738 25 Random 697 1 2074 9 Total 927 1 7289 39

Attachment 1 to L-2013-076 Page 2 of 3 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA During the reporting period of 2012, Florida Power & Light Co./Turkey Point Nuclear Plant conducted 8216 drug and alcohol tests in accordance with 10 CFR Part 26. Random test rates are as follows:

Reporting Period POOLS 2012 Turkey Point Nuclear Plant 53.8%

BREAKDOWN OF CONFIRMED POSITIVE TESTS Amphe- Phency- Refusal Turkey Point Marijuana Cocaine Opiates tamines clidine Alcohol to Test/

Nuclear Plant Subversion Adulteration Licensee 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 Employees Contractors 15 7 0 I 0 9 7 Total 1 15 7 0 1 1 1 0 101 7 j40 Management Actions For the reporting period of 2012, forty (40) individuals were denied unescorted access authorization after testing positive for drugs or alcohol. By test type, two (2) follow-up tests were positive, three (3) for cause -

observed behavior tests were positive, twenty-five (25) pre-access tests were positive, and ten (10) random tests were positive.

Follow-Up Positive Test One (1) contractor employee tested positive for marijuana. One (1) contractor employee tested positive for cocaine. These individuals were denied access.

For Cause - Observed Behavior Positive Test Three (3) contractor employees tested positive for alcohol. These individuals were denied access.

Pre-Access Positive Test Eight (8) initial contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. One (1) initial contractor employee tested positive for cocaine. Two (2) initial contractor employees tested positive for alcohol. Two (2) reinstatement 31-365 contractor employees tested positive for cocaine. Three (3) reinstatement 31-365 contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. Two (2) reinstatement 31-365 contractor employees tested positive for alcohol. One (1) reinstatement less than 30 day contractor employee tested positive for marijuana. These individuals were denied access. One (1) initial contractor employee refused to complete an observed test required for entering the follow-up testing program. One (1) initial contractor employee

Attachment 1 to L-2013-076 Page 3 of 3 FITNESS FOR DUTY PROGRAM PERFORMANCE DATA refused to complete an observed test required by the MRO following an invalid drug test result. Three (3) initial contractor employees provided initial specimens below the required minimum temperature, the subsequent observed specimens were ruled positive by the MRO. Based on this information, the MRO ruled that these individuals had attempted to subvert the testing process. One (1) reinstatement 31-365 contractor employee was unable to provide a specimen after three (3) hours. The MRO followed the shy bladder protocol and determined the individual attempted to subvert the testing process. These individuals were permanently denied access.

Random Positive Test Two (2) contractor employees tested positive for alcohol. Three (3) contractor employees tested positive for cocaine. Two (2) contractor employees tested positive for marijuana. One (1) contractor employee tested positive for amphetamines. These individuals were denied access.

One (1) licensee employee tested positive for alcohol. This individual was denied access. One (1) contractor employee attempted to subvert the testing process. This individual was permanently denied access.

Additional Comments

1. There were five (5) subversion attempts during the 2012 reporting period. Four are reported under pre-access positive tests. One is reported under random positive tests. These individuals were permanently denied access.
2. Four (4) individuals appealed positive results. In all cases, the positive result was confirmed by the Medical Review Officer based on the result received from the appeal laboratory.
3. One (1) contractor employee was unable to provide a urine specimen. The MRO followed shy bladder protocol. This individual was retested upon return to work with negative results.
4. For the 2012 reporting period, all blind specimens submitted to Turkey Point Nuclear Plant's HHS-certified laboratory yielded expected results.

Reportable Events Turkey Point Nuclear Plant had four (4) reportable events as defined in 10 CFR Part 26.719 during this reporting period. On April 11, 2012, at 07:28 (EST) a 24-hour reportable FFD event report (EN #47827) was made in accordance with 10 CFR 26.719(b)(2)(ii). On April 27, 2012, at 13:19 (EST) a 24-hour reportable FFD event report (EN #47869) was made in accordance with 10 CFR 26.719(b)(2)(ii). On June 20,2012, at 17:24 (EST) a 24-hour reportable FFD event report (EN #48039) was made in accordance with 10 CFR 26.719(b)(2)(ii). On November 19, 2012, at 15:51 (EST) a 24-hour reportable FFD event report (EN #48526) was made in accordance with 10 CFR 26.719(b)(2)(ii).

Attachment 2 to L-2013-076 Turtey Point [

1 ,,E 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results

-,Jm*r w*i.r I1 -*9en'*n~rfw 1ifuli Summa of Iver Issuance - 20 203 a 1 H1 I Number of Waivers Issued (Note: At least one of the cells In this table should have a non-negative value)

Operating or on-site directing of the Performing health physis or chemistry Performing duties of a fire brigade Performing maintenance or oneite Performing security operations of systems es described in desofab e i gade directing of maintenance, as described in 28.4(a)(1) duties as described in 26.4(s)(2) member, as described in 26.4(a)(3) 26.4(a)(4) duties as described in 26T4()()ot rk Hour Controls1-0)

Outage (afe Outage(after0 Outage (after Outage (after OprogIOutage (days Outage(after

_____Oeaig 1-60) dayei0) Operating Outage day 60) Operating Outage day 60) Operating Outage day 60) Operating outage day60) ___ ____

Exceed 16 work bra In any 24 hr period 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 H ours Hours Exceed 28 work hra In any 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

. 05(d)()

2 62 48 hrr Exceeded 72 work bra in any 7 day period 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lesa than 10 hr break bIt successive work periods (for 8 hr break Rest Breaks accommodating scheduled transition 26.205(d)(2) bit shift) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Less than 34 hr break In any 5 day period 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Avg of less than 1 day off per week for 8-hour shifts white operating 00 0000 Avg of Wess than 2 days off per week Minimum for 10-hour shltts while operating 0 0 0 Days Off Per Avg of Ieo than 2.5 days off per Shift Cycle week for 12-hour shifts while 26.205(dX3) opera*ing Avg of less than 2 days off per week for 12*hour maintenance shifts Avg of loes than 3 days off per week for 12-hour security shifts Leas than 3 days off per successive Minri*um 15-day period 0 Days Off for outage Less then 1 day off per 7-day period 2A.206(dX4) for maintenance personnel and 26.205(d)(5) Less than 4 days off per sucoessive 15-day period for security personnel Alternate to Minumum Days Off 26.205(d)(7) 54 hour6.25e-4 days <br />0.015 hours <br />8.928571e-5 weeks <br />2.0547e-5 months <br /> maximum average TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

  • NOTE: For Individuals performing fire brigade duties and other duties. please count them only under the fire brigade column. Do not double count these individuals.

Attachment 2 to L-2013-076 10 CFR Part 26, Subpart I - Annual Fatigue Results I-Facility Name Report Period Turkey Point V 120,iIE Distribution of Waiver for Individuals in Each Category - 26.203(e)(1)(iii) Summary of Corrective Actions - 26.203(e)(2) I Number of Employees Issued Waivers Analysis of Waiver Assessment Data:

There were no waivers issued. at Turkey Point during 2012 Operating or on- Performing Performing Performing site directing of health physics duties of a fire maintenance or Performing the operations or chemistry brigade member onsite directing security duties of systems, as duties as as described in of maintenance as described in described in described in as described in 26.4(a)(5) 26.4(a)(1) 26.4(a)(2) 26.4(a)(3) 26.4(a)(4) 1 0 0 0 0 0 Analysis of Fatigue Assessment Data:

2 46 fatigue assessments were performed: 41 of the 46 were post-events - none were determined to be 3 fatigued; 12 of the 41 post-events were related to personnel injuries - 2 on-line and 10 outage for I RP 4 worker and 11 Maintenance non-covered workers; 5/46 were for-cause assessments due to observed 5 behavior - 2 on-line and 3 outage, all Maintenance supplemental workers;Management actions - 3 were 6 denied access to plant due to causes other than fatigue. No work was performed after fatigue assessments.

7 8

9 10 11-20 More than 20 Total Number of Employees Issued Waivers Most Waivers Provided to a Single individual "Note:For individuals performingthe fire brigade duleies, please count them only under fire brigade column. Do not doublecourt these individuals.

Summary of Status of Corrective Actions:

No corrective actions required