Text

Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014
	ML15117A447
Person / Time
Site:	Salem, Hope Creek
Issue date:	04/27/2015
From:	; Public Service Enterprise Group
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML15117A445	List: LR-N15-0081, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014; LR-N15-0081, Hope Creek, and Salem, Units 1 & 2, Submittal of 2014 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report; ML15117A446;
References
	LR-N15-0081
	Download: ML15117A447 (134)
	v • d • e

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM PSEG Nuclear LLC, SALEM and HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS 2014 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2014

Intentionally left blank TABLE OF CONTENTS I . Summary ... ....................................... . ... ................. . . ................... ...................................... 1 I I . The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program ............ . . . . ........... ............ ... ...... . . ... 4 A. Objectives of the Operational REMP ....... . ........... . .

.. .... . . ...... . ... .. .... . ............. . ...... .5 B. I mplementation of the Objectives . . ... .... .. . .................. . . . . ......... . ............................ 6 I l l . Program Description ...... ............. . . .

.. . . . . ............ . ..... .. . ..................... . ........... .. ................... 7 A. Data Interpretation ......... . . ......... ..... ..... ... . .......... . .

..... ...... ... ..................... . ... .. .. .... . . 7 B. Program Exceptions . . . . . .... . . . . . . ...... . . . .

. ... ....................... . .

. ......... . ..... . .................. . . . 9 C. Program Changes ..... . ....... .. . . ...... . .. . .. . ........ .......... . .................. . .............. . ....... ... 10 D . Quality Assurance Program .... . . ......... .... . . ................... . ..... .. .................... . .. . ...... 10 E. Summary of Results: Inter-laboratory Comparison Program . ..... . .

.. .......... ... . .... 10 F. Summary of Results: Duplicate Sample Com parison Program .......... .. .......... . . 15 IV. Results and Discussion . ................. . ... .......... ........... . ......... . ...... . . ....... . ................ . ........ 17 A. Atmospheric . ..................... ... ...... . ............... . ........... . .......... . ..... .. ........ . ................ 18 1 . Air Particulates .......... . .. . ... .......... . . . . .. .. . . ............. ... ................................ . 18

..

2 . Air Iodine .. . . ..... .......... . .

. .. ................. . .. ........... . ........ . ................ . . . . 20

.. .. ..... ...

B. Direct Radiation .......... . .

.. . . .... . . .. .......... ........ . .......... . . ................ . ........... . .......... . . 20

.

C. Terrestrial . . .................. . .

.. . .. .. . .... . ...... . ............. . ..... . .. . ........................ . ............ . . 22

. .

1 . Milk . ........ . . ................. . ... . .. ............ . .......... . . ......... . ... . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . . . ... . . . 23

2. Well Water (Ground Water) . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24

3. Potable Water (Drinking Water) ................................. . ............................ 25

4. Vegetables .............. . .

... ........ . .... .. . .. ..... . .............................. . ......... . .. . ....... 26

5. Fodder Crops ............ . . .. . ... . ..

.... ............ . ....................... .. ............... . . ........ 27

6. Soil . . ................... . .

.. ................. . ................ . .................. . .. .

.... . . .......... .. ...... 28

7. Beef and Game . . ... . . ... ... . . . ... .............. .. . ..... . ........ ...... . . . ........... . ................ 29 D . Aquatic .. . . . ... . ............... . .

.. . .. ..... . ........ .. ............... .. .

. .. ........... ... ........ . ..

..... .......... . 29

..

1 . Surface Water ............ . . . ........ . . . . .. ...... . .......... . .... ............. ... ............ . ...... . .. 30

2. Fish . . .. ... . .... . ..

..... . . ........ . . . . ... . ........ . ......... . ........................... .. . . ................. 32

3. Blue Crab . . . .. .......... . ..... .. . .. ... . ....... . ............ . ........... ..... . ..... . ..... . .......... . .. . .. 33

4. Sediment . ........... .. ...... . . . . ........... . ............. . ....... . ...... . . ........ ... ....... .. ........ . . . 33 E. Land Use Survey ..... . .. . .

... ..... . . .. . ....... ... .. ....... . . .......... . . . . ............ . . .. ........... . ......... 35 V. Annotations to Previous AREOR .... .. . ........ .. ...... . ..... . .

.. ................ . .... . .. . ..... . ............ ..... 36 VI. Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentrations 36 ..

V I I. Conclusions ............... . .. ......... . . ..... . . . .............................. .. .. .. .............. . ....... .. ............... 36 VI I I . References .......... ..................... .. .... . .. .. ...... . ............... . ......... . ................ . .... . ..... . ......... 37

-i-

TABLE OF CONTENTS (cont'd)

Appendix A - Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . A-1 Appendix B - Sample Designation and Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . B-1 Appendix C - Data Tables. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . ... .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 Appendix D - Summary of I nterlaboratory Comparison Program Results from Eckert &

Ziegler Analytics (EZA), Environmental Resource Associates (ERA), and Department of Energy (DOE) Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) . ........... ............................... .................. . . . ............................................... D-1

- ii -

LIST OF TABLES Table A-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . A-5 Table B-1 Sampling Locations . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . B-3 Table B-2 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . B-7 Table C-1 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Quarterly Com posites of Air Particu lates . .. . . . . .... . .. .. . . . .......... . . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . . . . .. . . . ...... . . . .. . ........... . . . . . . . . ....... . . C-3 Table C-2 Concentrations of Gross Beta Em itters in Air Particulates . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-5 Table C-3 Concentrations of lodine-1 3 1 in Filtered Air . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-7 Table C-4 Direct Radiation Measu rements - Quarterly Dosimetry Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-9 Table C-5 Concentrations of lodine- 1 3 1 and Gamma Em itters in Milk . .. . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . C-1 0 Table C-6 Concentrations of G ross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Triti um in Well Water. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 2 Table C-7 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Well Water. . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 3 Table C-8 Concentrations of G ross Alpha and Gross Beta Emitters and Tritium in Raw and Treated Potable Water (2F3) . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . .. .. . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . C-1 4 Table C-9 Concentrations of lodine- 1 31 and Gamma Emitters in Raw and Treated Potable Water (2F3) .. . . . . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . .. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . C-1 5 Table C-1 0 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Vegetables . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 6 Table C-1 1 Concentrations of Gamma Em itters in Fodder Crops . .. . . .. . . .. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-1 9 Table C- 1 2 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Soil . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . .. . .. . . .. . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . C-20

- iii-

LIST OF TABLES (cont'd)

Table C-1 3 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Beef and Game . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-2 1 Table C-1 4 Concentrations of Tritium in Surface Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-22 Table C-1 5 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Surface Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-23 Table C-1 6 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Edible Fish . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . C-26 Table C-1 7 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Crabs . . . . . . . ... . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . C-27 Table C-1 8 Concentrations of Gamma Emitters in Sediment . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-28 Table C-1 9 Concentrations of Tritium and Gamma Emitters in D uplicate Samples from G EL .................. . . . . . ........... . . ........................... . . . . . . .......................... .... . .... . . C-29 Table D-1 EZA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-3 Table D-2 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program Teledyne Brown Engineering . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .. . D-6 Table D-3 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program {MAPEP)

Teledyne Brown Engineering . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-7 Table D-4 EZA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program G EL Laboratories . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . D-9 Table D-5 DOE's Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP)

GEL Laboratories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1 1 Table D-6 ERA Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program GEL Laboratories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1 6 Table D-7 ERA MRAD Environmental Radioactivity Cross Check Program G EL Laboratories . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . D-1 8

- iv -

LIST OF MAPS Map 8-1 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program On-Site Sampling Locations .... ........ 8-1 2 M ap 8-2 Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Off-Site Sampling Locations .... ........ 8-1 3 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Gross Beta Activity in Air Particu lates- QUARTE RLY AVERAG E .......... C-3 1 Figure 2 Tritium Activity in S u rface Water - QUARTERLY AVERAGE................... C-32 Figure 3 Cesium-1 37 & Cobalt-60 Activity in Aquatic Sediment - SEMI-ANN UAL AVERAGE ........................ . .. . . . . ........ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . C-33 Figure 4 Cesium-1 37 Activity in Soil (Triennial) ..... .... . . .. ..... . .. .............. ........ .......... C-34

-v-

r LIST OF ACRONYMS O R TERMS USED I N THIS TEXT (in alphabetical order)

AREOR Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

% Percent A Acceptable a posteriori- The terms a posteriori ("from the later") and a priori ("from the a posteriori earlier") are used to distinguish two types of knowledge, justification, or argument a priori- The terms a priori ("from the earlier") and a posteriori ("from the a priori later") are used to distinguish two types of knowledge, justification, or argument AIO Air Iodine Analyte The substance being identified and measured in a chemical analysis APT Air Particulates BaLa-140 BariumLathanum-140 Be-7 Beryllium-?

Bq Bequerels c Control Co-57 Colbalt-57 Co-60 Colbalt-60 Cs-134 Ceslum-134 Cs-137 Cesium-137 eves Chemical Volume Control System DOE Department of Energy dpm Disintegrations per minute ECH Crabs ERA Environmental Resource Associates ESF Fish ESS Sediment Eu-152 Europium-152 EZA Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, Inc.

Fe-59 Iron-59 FPL Broad Leafy Vegetation FPV Vegetables GAM Game GEL GEL Laboratories Gr-A Gross Alpha Gr-B Gross Beta H-3 Tritium -

HCGS Hope Creek Generating Station 1-131 lodine-131 r-**

IDM Immersion Dose Monitor --

ISFSI Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation K-40 Potassium-40 kg Kilogram L Liter

-vi-

-- --

LLD Lower Limit of Detection

-- - ----

LTS Laboratory Testing Services ---..*

3 m Cubic meter MAPEP Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program --

MDC Minimum Detectable Concentration mL Milliliter --

MLK Milk

- --

Mn-54 Manganese -54 -*-

MilliRoentgen - a unit of radiation, used to measure the exposure of mR somebody or something to X-rays and gamma rays, defined in terms of the ionization effect on air.

Millirem - a unit for measuring amounts of radiation, equal to the effect that mrem one roentgen of X-rays or gamma-rays would produce in a human being. It is used in radiation protection and monitoring.

MWe Megawatt Electric MWt Megawatt Thermal

--

N Not Acceptable --

NCR Nonconformance Report -

NEI Nuclear Energy Institute --*

NELAC National Environmental Laboratory Conference NRC U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ODCM Offsite Dose Calculation Manual

-

f--'-

pCi- - -- Picocuries

---

PE Performance Evaluation 1------

PSEG Public Service Enterprise Group - ---

PT ---- -

Performance Testing --

PWR Potable (drinking) Water- Raw --

PWT Potable (drinking) Water PWT Potable (drinking) Water - Treated *--

QA Quality Assurance Ra-226 Radium- 226 REMP Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RGPP Radiological Groundwater Protection Program --

SA Salem SAR Safety Analysis Report

-* --

SGS Salem Generating Station

-* --

SOL Soil SOP -

Standard Operating Procedures --

-

--*-

Sr-89 Strontium - 89

- - *--

Sr-90 Strontium - 90 ------

Standard Standard Quarter = 92 days

_Quarter SWA Surface Water --

TBE Teledyne Brown Engineeri g

--

_ ----

TEDA Triethylene-diamine

- vii -

--

Th-232 Thorium-232 Thermoluminescent Dosimeter- A TLD measures ionizing radiation exposure by measuring the intensity of visible light emitted from a crystal in TLD the detector when the crystal is heated. The intensity of light emitted is dependent upon the radiation exposure.

TS Technical Specifications uCi Microcuries USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency VGT Fodder Crops w Warning WWA Ground (well) Water Zn-65 Zinc-65 ZrNb-95 ZirconiumNiobium-95

- viii -

I. Summary During normal operations of a nuclear power generating station there are perm itted releases of small amounts of radioactive material to the environm ent. To monitor and determine the effects of these releases, a Rad iological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) has been established for the PSEG Nuclear LLC, Salem Generating Station (SGS) and Hope Creek Generating Station (HCGS). The results of the REMP are pu blished annually, providing a summary and interpretation of the data collected .

Public Service Enterprise Group's (PSEG) Laboratory & Testing Services (L TS) performed the collection of environmental samples during 201 4. TBE performed the analysis of environmental samples during 20 1 4. Duplicate samples for laboratory quality assurance (QA) were sent to GEL Laboratories. Mirion Technologies provided the dosimetry services.

The REMP is based on N RC guidance as reflected in the SGS's and HCGS's Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM) with regards to sample media, sampling locations, sampling frequency and analytical sensitivity requirem ents. I ndicator and control locations were established for com parison purposes to distinguish radioactivity of plant origin from natural or other "manmade" environmental rad ioactivity. The environmental monitoring program also verifies projected and anticipated radionuclide concentrations in the environment and related exposures from releases of radion uclides from SGS and HCGS. This program satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B .2 of Appendix I to 1 0 CFR 50 and provides surveillance of all appropriate critical exposure pathways to man .

The detection capabilities, required by SGS's and HCGS's ODCM , were achieved for the 201 4 reporting period . Exceptions to the program are noted and the PSEG corrective action id entifier was incl uded i n parenthesis. The

-1

data that were collected in 20 1 4 demonstrate that both SGS and H CGS were operated in com pliance with each plant's respective Technical Specifications and ODCMs and the applicable Federal regulations. The REMP objectives were also met.

Most of the radioactive materials noted in this report are either natural ly occurring in the environment such as potassium (K) 40 or beryllium (Be) 7 , or a result of non-nuclear generating station activity, such as atmospheric nuclear weapons testing or medical wastes. Measurements made in the vicinity of SGS and HCGS were compared to background or control m easurements and the preoperational REMP study performed before SGS Unit 1 became operational .

Samples of air particulates, air iodine, milk, surface water, ground (well) water, potable (drinking) water, vegetables, fodder crops, soil, fish , crabs and sediment were collected and analyzed . External radiation dose measurements were also made in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS using passive dosimeters.

The REMP complies with the following Safety Analysis Report (SAR) document sections:

Technical Specifications ODCM

-

SGS U1 6.8.4.h 3/4 . 1 2 . 1 6 .9 . 1 . 7 SGS U2 6.8.4.h 3/4. 1 2 . 1 6.9. 1 .7 HCGS U 1 6.8.4 . h 3/4. 1 2. 1 6.9 . 1 .6 To demonstrate this, com pliance samples obtained from various media were analyzed for one or more of the following: gamma emitting isotopes, tritiu m (H-3), iodine-1 3 1 ( 1- 1 31 ) , gross alpha, gross beta and imm ersion dose. The results of these analyses were used to assess the environmental impact of

SGS and HCGS operations, thereby demonstrating compliance with the respective SGS's and HCGS's Technical Specifications and ODCMs and the applicable Federal regulations.

There were a total of 1 688 analyses on 1 380 environm ental sam ples during 20 1 4. Of the total number of analyses and environmental samples, direct radiation dose measurements were made using 2 1 8 sets of direct reading dosimeters.

In addition to the natu rally occurring isotopes (i.e. Be-7 , K-40, Ra-226, and Th-232) cesium-1 37 was identified in one sediment sample at a concentration of 29 pCi!kg . Cesium-1 37 from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing is routinely found in sediment and soil samples.

Ambient radiation measurements are made with quarterly passive dosimeters at onsite and offsite locations around SGS/H CGS. The direct radiation component was determined by comparing badges on the site boundary (5S 1 , 1 0S 1 , 1 1 S 1 , 1 5S 1 and 1 5S2) to the designated controls (3G 1 and 1 4G 1 ). The direct radiation dose is determ ined by su btracting the control data from the badge data. The range of the site boundary dosimeters, with an annual dose between 45 m R and 50 mR, were lower than the control locations of 59 mR and 62 mR. Therefore, there was no measurable direct radiation to a member of the public at the site boundary.

The reason that the site badges are lower is that the su rround ing waters lower the radon concentration and limit terrestrial radiation. The 20 1 4 dose measurements were comparable to the levels prior to station operation that had an average of 55 m R per year for 1 973 to 1 976.

The ambient radiation levels as measured by th e two site boundary locations 1 S 1 and 1 6S2 ranged from 34.7 m R/Standard Quarter to 38.8 mR!Standard Quarter. The doses at these two locations were influenced by the radiation shine from the dry cask storage located in the nearby Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation ( I S FS I ) . The Federal Regulations 40 CFR 1 90 and

1 0 CFR 72. 1 04 both limit the dose to a real member of the public to 25 mrem to the total body. To demonstrate compliance to these regulations, the maximum dose that a hypothetical individual member of the public was calculated at 5.1 mrem , which was well below the Federal limits for exposure .

Following the guidance in Nuclear Energy I n stitute's (NEI) 07-07, the results of the annual report of the Radiological Groundwater Protection Program

( RGPP), formerly reported in this report, have been moved to the Annual Radiological Effluent Release Report.

T he concentration of radioactive material in the environment that cou ld be attributable to SGS and HCGS operations was only a small fraction of the concentration of naturally occurring and man-made radioactivity. The data obtained from the 20 1 4 REMP were comparable to the results obtained d u ring the preoperational phase of the program . Combined with historical results collected since com mercial operation , it can be concluded that the levels and fluctuations were as expected and therefore, we conclude that the operation of SGS and H CGS had no significant radiological impact on the environment.

II. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program SGS and H CGS are located in Lower Alloways Creek Township, Salem County, New Jersey. SGS consists of two operating pressurized water nuclear power reactors. SGS U nit 1 has a net rating of 1 1 80 megawatt electric (MWe) and SGS U n it 2 has a net rating of 1 1 78 MWe. The licensed core power for both u n its is 3459 megawatt thermal (MWt). HCGS is a boiling water nuclear power reactor, which has a net rating of 1 21 2 MWe.

The licensed core power is 3840 MWt.

The Generating Stations are located on a man-made peninsula on the east bank of the Delaware River. The peninsula was created by the deposition of

hydraulic fill from d redging operations. The surrounding environm ent is characterized mainly by the Delaware River Estuary and Bay, extensive tidal marshlands, and low-lying meadowlands. These land types make up approximately 85% of the land area within five miles of the site, with most of the remaining land used for agriculture.

Since 1 968, a Rad iological Environm ental Monitoring Program (REMP) has been cond ucted at SGS and HCGS. Starting in Decem ber 1972, a more extensive radiological monitoring program was initiated in preparation for the operation of SGS Unit 1 . The operational REMP was initiated in December 1 976 when SGS Unit 1 achieved criticality.

An overview of the 20 1 4 REMP is provided in Table B-2, Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program .

Radioanalytical data from samples collected under th is program were compared with results from the preoperational phase and historical results d u ring operations. Differences between these periods were exam ined statistically to determine the effects of station operations. This report presents the results from January 1 through December 3 1 , 20 1 4 , for the SGS/HCGS REMP.

A. Objectives of the Operational REMP

1. To fulfill the requirements of the Rad iological Surveillance sections of the SGS and HCGS ODCMs.

2. T o determine whether any significant increase occurred i n the concentration of radionuclides in critical pathways.

3. To verify the models used by SGS and HCGS to predict the radioactive inventory in the surrounding environment.

4. To detect any change in ambient gamma radiation levels.

5. T o verify that S G S and H CGS operations do not have detrimental effects on the health and safety of the pu blic or on the environment.

B. I mplementation of the Objectives

1. Samples of various media were selected for monitoring due to the radiological dose im pact to h uman and other organisms.

The selection of samples was based on:

(a) Established critical pathways for the transfer of radionuclides th rough the environment to man, and (b) Experience gained during the preoperational phase.

Sampling locations were determined based on site meteorology, Delaware River Bay estuarine hydrology, local demography, and land uses.

2. Sampling locations are divided into two classes: indicator and control. Indicator stations are those which are expected to manifest station effects. Control samples are collected at locations which are believed to be unaffected by station operations, usually at 1 5 to 30 kilometers (9.3 to 1 8 .6 miles) away from the generating stations. Fluctuations in the levels of radionuclides and direct radiation at indicator stations are evaluated with respect to analogous fluctuations at control stations. Indicator and control station data are also evaluated relative to preoperational data.

3. Appendix A, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary, descri bes the coding system which identifies sample type and location and describes and summarizes the analytical results in accordance with Section 6. 9 . 1 .7 of the SGS ODCM and Section 6.9. 1 .6 of the HCGS ODCM . Table A-1

summarizes average, minimum and maximum activities of the indicator locations, control locations and location with the highest mean using values above the LLD .

4. Appendix B , Sample Designation and Locations. Table B-1 Sampling Locations lists the station codes, locations, latitude, longitude and the types of samples collected at each station .

5. The sampling locations are indicated on Maps B-1 , Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program On-site Sam pling Locations and B-2 ,

Salem and Hope Creek Generating Stations' Rad iological Environmental Mon itoring Program Off-site Sampling Locations.

Ill. Program Description A. Data Interpretation Results of analyses are g rouped according to sample type and presented in Appendix C, Data Tables. All results above the Lower Limit of Detection ( LLD ) are at a confid ence level of+/- 2 sigma. This represents the range of values into wh ich 95% of repeated analyses of the same sample should fall . As defined in U .S . Nuclear Regulatory Commission N U REG-1 301 and N U REG-1 302 , LLD is the smallest concentration of rad ioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count ( above system background ) that will be detected with 95%

probability, with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real signal ." The equation for determining LLD is:

4.66

Sb LLD =

E* V

2.22* Y

exp(-At) 4.66 is the statistical factor from N U REG 1 302 Sb is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the cou nting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the cou nting efficiency, as counts per disintegration ,

V is the sample size in units of mass or vol ume,

2. 22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie ,

Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable,

'A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide (sec-1 ), and t for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collection, or end of the sam ple col lection period , and time of cou nting (sec).

The LLD is an "a priorl' number, which represents the capability of the measurement system (incl uding instrumentation , procedure and sam ple type) and not as an after the fact criteria for the presence of activity. All analyses are designed to achieve the required SGS/HCGS detection limits for environmental sam ple analysis.

The Minimum Detectable Concentration (MDC) is defined as above with the exception that the measurement is an "a posteriad' (after the fact) estimate of the presence of activity. The MDC is generally lower than the LLD.

The g rouped data were averaged and standard deviations calculated .

The +/- 2 sigma deviations of the averaged data represent sample and not analytical variability. For reporting and calculation of averages,

any positive result occu rring at or below the LLD is considered to be at that level.

B. Program Exceptions Gross Beta in air particulates LLD of 1 OE-3 pCi/m 3 was not met for the 1 /20/1 4 to 1 /27/ 1 4 sample at location 2F6 due to low sample volume.

The low sample volume was associated with the unit only being in service for 26.3 hours3.472222e-5 days 8.333333e-4 hours 4.960317e-6 weeks 1.1415e-6 months due to planned maintenance in the facility that supplies power to the air sampler. A MDC of 2 1 .6E-3 pCilm 3 was achieved (801 1 1 508-op01 0).

When changing the 5S2 air sam pler filter on 8/4/1 4 , the sampler was observed to be out of service. The sampler should have operated for 1 69.9 hou rs. However, actual recorded run time was 92 . 1 hours1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months for a total of 7700 cu bic feet of air collected. The pump was replaced and sampler returned to service (701 68294 ).

The LLD for Surface Water was not met on sam ples collected 8/5/1 4 for locations 1 1 A1 , 1 2C 1 , 1 F2 , 1 6F1 , and 7E 1 . Sam ples were col lected on 08/05/1 4 and were received on 09/1 7/1 4. Due to the age of the sam ples upon arrival at the laboratory, the LLD could not be metfor Bala-1 40 & 1-1 3 1 ( 1 0400229).

REMP air station 1 6E 1 lost approximately five hours of data the week of 09/0 1 /1 4 to 09/08/1 4. There was a storm during the week that is suspected to have caused a loss of power, accou nting for the five hours of missing data. No other problems were observed and the sample station was ru nning as expected on 09/08/1 4 (70 1 69066).

Air samplers 5S 1 and 5S2 were out of service from 0239 1 0/07/1 4 until 1 330 1 0/08/1 4 and again on 1 1 /23/1 4 from 0949 to 1 800 due to

electrical tagout for planned maintenance on the checkpoint emergency diesel generator (70170 1 37, 80 1 1 3 1 72-op200).

C. Program Changes There were no revisions of the SGS O DCM or of the HCGS ODCM during this reporting period .

Su rface water gross beta analysis by TBE was discontin ued i n 20 1 4.

It is not an ODCM requ irement and mainly served to indicate potassium-40 level whi ch is measured d i rectly by gamma analysis.

The types of sam ple media analyzed by duplicate samples were increased to improve the overall QA program. Duplicate sam ples are col lected with one sample generally sent to TBE and the second sample to G EL. Table C-1 9 was added for positive results obtained by GEL. Results of less than detectable are not incl uded since goal is to compare those positive results for agreement.

D. Quality Assurance Program Teledyne Brown Engineering The quality of the results obtained by TBE is ensured by the implementation of the Quality Assurance Program as described in the TBE Quality Assurance M anual and the TBE Procedure Manual.

E. Summary of Results: Inter-laboratory Comparison Program TBE analyzed Performance Evaluation (PE) sam ples of air particulate, air iodine, m ilk, soi l , vegetation and water matrices, as appropriate for 1 69 analyses (Appendix D , Tables D-1 through D-3). G EL analyzed Performance Evalu ation (PE) samples of air particulate, air iodine,

milk, soil , vegetation and water matrices, as appropriate for 446 analyses (Append ix D , Tables D-4 through D-7).

The PE samples, supplied by Eckert & Ziegler Analytics, I nc (EZA),

Environmental Resource Associates (ERA), and Department of Energy's (DOE) M ixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP), were evaluated against the following acceptance criteria:

1. EZA Evaluation Criteria EZA's evaluation report provides a ratio of reported result and EZA's known value. Since flag values are not assigned by EZA, TBE evaluates the reported ratios based on internal QC requirements, which are based on the DOE MAPEP criteria.

2. ERA Evaluation Criteria ERA's evaluation report provides an acceptance range for control and warning limits with associated flag values. ERA's acceptance limits are established in accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), National Environmental Laboratory Conference (N ELAC) performance testing (PT) program requirements, or ERA' s standard operating procedure (SOP) for the Generation of Performance Acceptance Lim its, as applicable. The acceptance limits are either determ ined by a regression equation specific to each analyte or a fixed percentage limit promu lgated under the appropriate regulatory document.

3. DOE Evaluation Criteria MAPEP's evaluation report provides an acceptance range with associated flag values.

The MAPEP defines three levels of performance: Acceptable (flag = "A"), Acceptable with Warning (flag = "W ") , and Not Acceptable (flag = "N"). Performance is considered acceptable when a mean result for the specified analyte is +/- 20% of the reference value. Performance is acceptable with warni ng when a mean result falls in the range from +/- 20% to +/- 30% of the reference value ( i . e . , 20% < bias < 30% ). If the bias is g reater than 30%, the results are deemed not acceptable.

Teledyne Brown Engineering In reviewing their environmental interlaboratory crosscheck programs, TBE identified 1 ) duplication of efforts on some matrices and isotopes and 2) that TBE performed crosscheck samples on some m atrices and isotopes that were not performed for clients. Since the DOE MAPEP is designed to evaluate the ability of analytical facilities to correctly analyze for radiological constituents representative of those at DOE sites, the needed changes were made to the analyses provided by the MAPEP. Therefore, the followi ng isotopes were removed from the MAPEP:

Soil -gamma - will be provided by EZA twice per year, starting in 20 1 5. For 201 4, one soil gam ma is provided by MAPEP, the 2 nd soil gamma is provided by EZA.

Air Particu late - gam m a- is currently provided by EZA.

Water - gamma, H-3, Sr-90, u ranium, g ross alpha and gross beta currently provided by EZA.

MAPEP evaluates non-reported (NR) analyses as failed if they were reported i n the previous series.

- 1 2-

For the TBE laboratory, 1 63 out of 1 69 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Six analyses (Ni-63, K-40 and 1-1 31 in water, and two Sr-90s and one G ross Alpha in AP samples) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1. TBE's MAP EP March 20 1 4 Ni-63 in water result of 32.7+/- 1 .69 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data but would have passed the acceptance range of 23.9 - 44.2 Bq/L (NCR 1 4-04).

2. TBE's MAPEP March 20 1 4 K-40 i n water result of 1 .63 +/- 2.49 Bq/L was overlooked when reporting the data but would have passed the false positive test (NCR 1 4-04).

3. TBE's ERA November 201 4 1-1 31 in water result of 1 5.8 pCi/L was lower than the known value of 20.3 pCi/L, failing below the lower acceptance limit of 1 6 .8. The result was evaluated as failed with a "found to known" ratio of 0 .778. No cause could be found for the slightly low result. All ERA 1-1 31 evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable (NCR 1 4-08).

4. TBE's MAP EP March 201 4 Sr-90 in AP result of 0 .822 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 1 . 1 8 Bq/sample, failing below the lower acceptance limit of 0 .83 B q/sam ple. The reanalyzed result was still low, but fell within the lower acceptance range of 0 .836. The reanalyzed result was statistically the same number as the original result. No cause could be fou nd for the slightly low resu lts (NCR 1 4-04).

5. TBE's MAPEP September 2014 Sr-90 in AP result of 0.31 0 Bq/sam ple was lower than the known value of 0. 703 Bq/sample. The g ravimetric yield of 1 1 7% was very high (we

normally see yields of 60% to 70 %) and cou ld account for the low activity (NCR 1 4-09).

6. TBE's MAPEP September 20 1 4 G r-Aipha in AP result of 0 . 1 53 Bq/sample was lower than the known value of 0 .53 Bq/sample.

The AP sample was cou nted on the wrong side. The AP filter was flipped over and recounted with accptable results (NCR 1 4-09).

For the G EL laboratory, 440 out of 446 analyses performed met the specified acceptance criteria. Six analyses (U-234/233 and U238 in soil , one U-235 in Vegetation, two Sr-89s and one Am-241 in water) did not meet the specified acceptance criteria for the following reasons:

1 .&2. G E L's MAPEP June 20 1 4 U-234/233 and U-238 in soil reported val ues were lower than the MAPEP known val ues. It was determined that the digestion method using hydrofluoric acid

( H F) was insufficient to completely digest the soil. MAP EP posted on their website that the analytes had been fused into the soil at an extremely high temperature. Reanalysis using a sodium hydroxide (NAOH) fusion method prior to ion exchange separation chemistry gave results for U-234/233 and U-238 that fell within the acceptance criteria (Corrective Action CARR 1 40605-879).

3 . G EL's MAPEP June 20 1 4 U-238 in vegetation reported value was higher than the MAPEP known value. The failure was due to a hand entry error when entering the result into the MAPEP website. The activity was incorrectly entered as 0.26 1

- 1 4-

ug/sample instead of the correct result of 0.0261 ug/sample (Corrective Action CARR1 40605-879).

4.&5. Two of GEL's ERA August 20 1 4 Sr-89 in water reported values were higher than the ERA known values. The associated QC samples and instru ment calibrations were reviewed but a cause for the failures cou ld not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error caused the h igh bias for the batch associated with these samples (Corrective Action CARR1 40825-902).

6. G EL's ERA May 20 1 4 Am-241 in water reported value was h igher than the ERA known value. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure count not be determi ned . G EL assumes an unidentified random error caused the high bias for the batch associated with these samples (Corrective Action CARR 1 40520-874 ) .

F. Summary of Results: Duplicate Sample Comparison Program Duplicate samples were obtained for some samples of air particulates, air iodine, m ilk, surface water, vegetables , game, fish , crabs and sediment. These samples were analyzed by G E L as comparison and validation of TBE results (Table C-1 9).

1. Air Particulates Gross Beta had positive results on all 48 d uplicate samples.

GEL reports sign ificantly higher Gross Beta results due to GEL and TBE using d ifferent calibration energy sou rces (801 1 082 1 ) .

Be-7 had positive results on all fou r duplicate sam ples analyzed and were in agreement withi n analytical errors.

2. Air Iodine All 48 duplicate sam ples were less than M DC so direct comparison was not possible.

3. Milk Potassium-40 had positive results on all 1 1 duplicate samples and were in agreement within analytical errors.

4. Surface Water Potassium-40 was positive on all four G EL results but on only one TBE result. Tritiu m was positive on one of the four samples. All were in agreement within analytical errors.

5. Vegetables On the 1 8 duplicate samples analyzed , 22 isotopes were positive on the GEL results. The N RC ratio based on resolution was u sed for acceptance criteria and 20 of the 22 positive results passed. One resu lt was detected by G EL but not detected by TBE which was also considered .acceptable. One result was outside the acceptance criteria. Overall this is considered an acceptable d uplicate sample comparison .

6. Game Potassium-40 had positive results on both the d uplicate samples and were in agreement within analytical errors.

7. Fish Potassium-40 had positive results on both the d uplicate samples and were in agreement within analytical errors.

- 1 6-

8. Crab Potassium-40 had positive results on the one duplicate sample and was in agreement within analytical errors.

9. Sediment Potassium-40 was positive on all three samples and were in agreement within analytical errors. Ra-226 was positive on two G EL results but was less than MDC on TBE results. Be-7 was positive on one GEL result but was less than MDC on TBE result.

IV. Results and Discussion The analytical results of the 201 4 REMP sam ples are d ivided into categories based on exposure pathways: atmospheric, direct radiation , terrestrial , and aquatic. The analytical results for the 201 4 REMP are summarized in Appendix A, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary. The data for individ ual samples are presented in Appendix C, Data Tables. The data are compared to the formal preoperational environmental monitoring program data (1 973-1 976) and to historical data during operations. The data col lected demonstrates that the SGS's and HCGS's REMP was conducted in com pliance with the Technical Specifications and SGS's and HCGS's ODCM.

The REMP for the SGS/HCGS Site has historically incl uded samples and analyses not specifically required by the SGS's and H CGS's ODCM . These analyses are referenced th roughout the report as Management Audit sam ples. LTS continues to collect these sam ples. The summary tables in this report incl ude these additional samples and analyses.

These Management Audit Sam ples are sam ples that are taken to augment the radiological effluent mon itoring program, but do not have a regulatory

basis nor do they fulfill any regulatory requirement. The following is a list and quantity of the Management audit samples collected in 20 1 4:

Sample Type Number of Samples Food Crops 29 Well Water 12 Potable Water (raw and treated) 24 t---

Fodder Crops 4 Beef and Game 3 A. Atmospheric Air particulate (APT) samples were collected on Sch leicher-Schu el l No. 25 g lass fiber filters with low-volume a i r samplers.

Iodine was col lected from the air by adsorption on triethylene-diamine (TEDA) impregnated charcoal cartridge connected in series after the air particulate filters. Air sample volumes were measured with calibrated dry-gas meters. The displayed volumes were corrected to standard temperature and pressure.

1. Air Particulates Air particulate (APT) samples were collected weekly at seven indicator locations (1 6 E 1 , 1 5S2, 1 F1 , 2F6, 501 , 5S1 and 7S 1 ),

one d uplicate station (5S2) and one control location ( 1 4G 1 ).

The duplicate station sample was shipped to the QC laboratory G EL for analysis. Each weekly sample col lected was analyzed for gross beta. Quarterly composites of the weekly samples from each station were analyzed for specific gamma emitters.

G ross Beta G ross beta activity was detected in 362 of 364 of the indicator station sam ples at concentrations ranging from 4E-03 pCi/m 3 to 28E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 1 3E-03 pCi/m 3 , and in 52 of 52 of the control station samples at concentrations ranging from ?E-03 pCi/m 3 to 20E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average of 1 4E-03 pCI/m 3. The maximum preoperational level detected was 920E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 74E-03 pCi!m 3 (Table C-2 , Appendix C) [Figure 1 - G ross Beta Activity in Air Particulate 1 990 through 20 1 4 are plotted as quarterly averages, with an inset depicting the period 1 973 to 201 4].

Gamma Spectrometry Gamma spectroscopy was performed on each of the 32 q uarterly composite sam ples.

Beryllium-?, attributed to cosmic ray activity i n the atmosphere, was detected in all 28 indicator station composites at concentrations ranging from 59E-03 pCi/m 3 to 1 39E-03 pCilm 3 with an average concentration of 97E-03 pCi/m 3 , and in the four control station com posites ranging in concentration from 88E-03 pCi!m 3 to 1 1 4E-03 pCilm 3 with an average concentration of 1 0 1 E-03 pCi/m 3. The maximum preoperational level detected was 330E-03 pCi/m 3 with an average concentration of 1 09E-03 pCi/m 3. Natu rally occurring potassium-40 was detected in one of 28 indicator station com posites at a concentration of 56E-03 pCi/m 3. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 ,

Appendix C).

2. Air Iodine Filtered air iodine samples (AI O) were collected weekly at seven i nd icator locations ( 1 6E 1 , 1 582, 1 F1 ,2F6, 5D1 ,581 and 781 ),one d uplicate station (582) and one control location

( 1 4G 1 ). The duplicate station sam ple was shipped to the QC laboratory G E L for analysis . Each sample was analyzed for 1-1 31. lodine-1 31 was not detected in any indicator or control sam ples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 42E-03 pCi/m 3 (Table C-3,Appendix C).

B. Direct Radiation Ambient radiation levels in the environs were measured with a pair of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD) supplied and processed by Mirion Technologies. Packets containing these passive dosimeters were placed in the owner-controlled area and around the S ite at various distances and in each land based meteorological sector and analyzed quarterly. Emphasis was placed on special i nterest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools.

A total of 58 Immersion Dose Mon itor (IDM) locations were established to monitor for direct radiation d uring 20 1 4, including 20 on-site locations (1 81 ,282,284,381 ,481 ,581 ,682,781 ,881 ,981 ,

1 081 , 1 1 81 , 1 281 ,1 381 , 1 481 , 1 581 , 1 582, 1681 , 1 682, and 1 683),

32 off-site locations within the 1 0 mile zone ( 1 F 1 ,2E1 ,2 F2,2 F5,2F6, 3E1,3F2,3F3,4D2,4F2,501 ,5 F 1 ,6F1 ,7F2,8F 1 , 9F1 , 1 0D 1 , 1 0F2, 1 1 E2, 1 1 F1 , 1 2 E1 ,1 2F1 , 1 3E1 , 1 3F2, 1 3 F3,1 3F4,1 4D 1 , 1 4F2, 1 5D 1 , 1 5F3, 1 6E 1 and 1 6F2) and six control locations beyond 1 0 miles ( 1 G3,3G 1 ,3 H 1 , 1 0G 1 , 1 4G 1 ,and 1 6G 1 ) .

Each location has two TLDs,containing two thermoluminescent phosphors of calcium fluoride (CaF) and Lithium Fluoride (LiF) phosphors.

The average quarterly dose rate for the offsite dosimeters was 1 4 . 1 m R!Standard Quarter. Excluding locations 1 S 1 and 1 6S2 , the onsite site boundary locations average quarterly dose rate was 1 3.0 m R/Standard Quarter. The control locations average quarterly dose rate was 1 4.0 m R/Standard Quarter. No significant differences were noted between the three groups (Table C-4, Append ix C) .

The am bient radiation levels as measured by the two site boundary locations 1 S 1 and 1 682 ranged from 34.7 mR!Standard Quarter to 38.8 m R/Standard Quarter. The doses at these two locations were influenced by the radiation shine from the d ry cask storage located in the nearby Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation (ISFSI).

Assum ing a nominal background of 52 m R/year ( 1 3 m R/Standard Quarter) the maximum dose i n these areas that could potentially affect a member of the population was calculated using the annual air exposure from location 1 6S2 of 92 .7 m rem per year (1 55 m R/year -

52 m R/year

0 .9 m rem/m R).

40 CFR 1 90 and 1 0 CFR 72 . 1 04 both limit the dose to a real member of the public to 25 m rem to the total body. The nearest resident in the North sector is greater than five m iles and 4.2 miles in the NNW sector, respectively from SGS/HCGS . To demonstrate compliance to these regulations, an individual member of the public is assumed to enter the site boundary area near the ISFS I for 20 days per year. The dose that this hypothetical individual would receive was calculated at 5 . 1 m rem/year (92.7 mrem/year

20 days I 365 days) which is well below the federal limits for exposure.

The preoperational average for the quarterly TLD readings was 4.4 mR/Standard Month or 1 3.2 mR/Standard Quarter. The results of the direct radiation measurements for 20 1 4 confirmed that the radiation levels in the vicinity of the SGS and HCGSs were si milar to previous years.

C. Terrestrial Terrestrial REMP sampling includes the col lection of milk, well water, potable water, vegetation, fodder crops and soil samples.

Milk sam ples (MLK) were taken semi-monthly when cows were on pasture and monthly when cows were not grazing on open pasture from three indicator locations (1 3E3, 1 4F4, 2G3) and one control location (3G 1 ). Animals are considered on pasture from April to November of each year. Sam ples were col lected in new polyethylene containers, sodium bisulfite was added , then the samples were frozen and transported in ice chests to the analytical laboratory.

Well water samples (WWA) were col lected monthly from one location (3E1 ). Separate raw (PWR) and treated potable water (PWT) samples were collected monthly from one location (2F3). Each monthly com posite was prepared by daily com positing by the City of Salem Water and Sewer Department. All samples were col lected in new polyethylene containers.

Locally grown vegetables (FPV) were collected at the time of harvest at 1 0 locations ( 1 S 1 , 7S 1 , 1 001 , 1 5S2, 1 6S 1 , 2 F9, 3H5, 1 5F4, 1 G 1 ,

and 2G2); fodder crops (VGT) were sampled at four locations ( 1 3E3, 1 4F4, 2G3 and 3G 1 ) ; and broad leaf vegetation (FPL) was sampled at five locations ( 1 001 , 1 5S2, 1 6S1, 1 S 1 , and 7S2). The vegetables and fodder samples are additional samples (Management Audit) taken to enhance the radiological monitoring progra m . There is no dairy farm

within th ree miles of SGS and HCGS and there is only one dairy within five miles. Therefore, broad leaf vegetation is g rown , maintained and harvested by LTS person nel in the late fall . All sam ples were weighed , packaged and shipped to TBE for analysis.

1. Milk Milk sam ples were col lected at four local dairy farms (two farms in New Jersey and two in Delaware). Each sample was analyzed for 1-1 3 1 and gamma em itters.

lodine-1 3 1 lodine-1 3 1 was not detected above MDC in any of the 80 samples analyzed. The LLDs were met. The maxi m um preoperational level detected was 65 pCi/L , which occurred following a period of atmospheric nuclear weapons tests (Table C-5 , Append ix C).

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 80 samples with concentrations for the 60 indicator station samples ranging from 1 , 1 51 pCi/L to 1 ,585 pCi/L with an average concentration of 1 ,353 pCi/L, and the 20 control station sample concentrations ranging from 1 ,061 pCi!L to 1 ,430 pCi!L, with an average concentration of 1 ,295 pCi/L . The maximum preoperational level detected was 2 ,000 pCi/L with an average concentration of 1 ,437 pCi/L. All other gamma em itters were less than the MDC (Table C-5, Appendix C).

2. Well Water (Ground Water)

Although offsite wells in the vicinity of S GS/HCGS are not directly affected by plant operations, well water samples were collected monthly from one farm (3E1 ). Samples from this well are considered Management Audit samples.

Gross Alpha Gross alpha activity was not detected above the MDC in any of the wel l water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 9 . 6 pCi/L (Table C-6, Appendix C).

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was not detected above the MDC in any of the wel l water samples. The preoperational results ranged from <2 . 1 pCi/L to 38 pCi/L , with an average value of 9 pCi/L (Table C-6 , Appendix C).

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected above the MDC i n any of the well water samples. The m aximum preoperational level detected was 380 pCi/L (Table C-6 , Appendix C).

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring potassium-40 and radi um-226 were not detected in any of the well water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected were 30 pCi/L and 2.0 pCi/L, respectively. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-7 , Append ix C).

3. Potable Water (Drinking Water)

Both raw and treated potable water samples were collected and com posited by The City of Salem Water and Sewer Department personnel. Each sample consisted of daily aliquots com posited into a monthly sam ple. The raw water sou rce for this plant is Laurel Lake and its adjacent wells. These are Management Audit samples as no liquid effluents discharged from SGS/HCGS directly affect this pathway.

Gross Alpha No g ross alpha activity was detected in any of the raw or treated water sam ples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 2.7 pCi/L (Table C-8, Appendix C).

Gross Beta Gross beta activity was detected in 1 0 of the 1 2 raw water samples and in 1 2 of the 1 2 treated water samples. The concentrations for the raw samples ranged from 3 .5 pCi/L to 6 . 9 pCi/L. Concentrations for the treated water ranged from 3.0 pCi/L to 8.1 pCi/L . The average concentration for both raw and treated water was 5 . 1 pCi!L . The maximum preoperational level detected was 9 . 0 pCi/L with an average concentration of 4.2 pCi/L (Table C-8 , Appendix C).

Tritium Tritium activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water sam ples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 350 pCi/L with an average of 1 79 pCi/L (Table C-8 ,

Appendix C).

lodine-1 3 1 lodine-1 31 measurements were performed to a n L L D of 1 .0 pCi!L. lodine- 1 3 1 activity was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data were available for comparison , since 1-1 31 was not analyzed as a specific radionuclide analysis prior to 1 989. Since that time all results have been below the MDC (Table C-9 , Appendix C).

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was not detected in any of the raw or treated water samples. No preoperational data were available for com parison . Naturally occurring Ra-226 was not detected in any raw or treated water samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 1 .4 pCi/L . All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-9, Appendix C).

4. Vegetables There are no farm products that are irrigated with water in which liquid plant effluents have been discharged .

A variety of food products are sampled from around the plant; however, the variety is dependent on the farmer's preference.

These vegetables are collected as Management Audit samples.

In addition, broad leaf vegetation was grown by L TS personnel and planted at four onsite locations and one offsite location in Delaware at 3.9 miles SSW. These broad leaf vegetable samples are collected since there are no m ilk farms operating within the five km radius of SGS/HCGS. The closest milk farm

( 1 3E3) is located in Odessa, DE at 5.0 miles (7.88 km ).

All samples (vegetable and broad leaf) were analyzed for

gamma emitters and included asparagus, cabbage, collards, sweet corn , peppers, and tomatoes. These sam ples were from eight indicator stations (62 sam ples) and th ree control stations

( 1 2 samples) . The results for these sam ples are discussed below.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in 1 1 of the 62 indicator station samples, with concentrations ranging from 1 79 pCi/kg (wet) to 363 pCi/kg (wet), with an average concentration of 246 pCi/kg (wet). It was not detected in any of the control station sam ples .

N o preoperational data were available for comparison .

Naturally occu rring K-40 was detected in all 62 indicator samples, with concentrations ranging from 1 ,655 pCi/kg (wet) to 6,784 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,775 pCi/kg (wet), and in all 1 2 control station samples at concentrations ranging from 1 ,626 pCi/kg (wet) to 3,267 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2 ,353 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 4,800 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2 , 1 40 pCi!kg (wet)

(Table C-1 0, Appendix C).

All other gamma em itters were less than the MDC.

5. Fodder Crops Although not required by the SGS and HCGS ODCMs, four samples of silage normally used as cattle feed were collected from three indicator stations and one control station . It was

determined that these products could be an element in the food-chain pathway .. These fodder crops are collected as Management Aud it samples and analyzed for gamma em itters.

All fou r locations from which sam ples were collected are milk sam pling stations.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring Be-7, attributed to cosmic ray activity in the atmosphere, was detected in two of the three indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 233 pCi/kg (wet) to 265 pCilkg (wet) with an average concentration of 249 pCi/kg (wet), and in the control station sample at a concentration of 265 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected for silage was 4 ,700 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2 ,000 pCi/kg (wet).

Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all three indicator samples at concentrations ranging from 3,036 pCi/kg (wet) to 4, 532 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3 ,790 pCi/kg (wet), and in the control station sample at a concentration of 4. , 532 pCi/kg (wet). Preoperational results averaged 7 ,000 pCi/kg (wet). All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 1 , Appendix C).

6. Soil Soil is sampled every three years at nine locations and analyzed for gamma emitters. These Management Audit samples were col lected in 20 1 3 and will not be col lected again until 201 6 (Table C-1 2, Appendix C) [Figure 4 - Cesium-1 37 Activity in Soil 1 974 through 201 3 , which is the most recent sample, are plotted as the triennial average].

7 . Beef and Game Although not required by the SGS or HCGS ODCMs, three muskrat sam ples were collected from two indicator stations.

The game samples were collected as Management Audit samples and analyzed for gamma em itters.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occu rring K-40 was detected in all three sam ples at concentrations ranging from 2,81 1 to 3,274 pCilkg (wet) with an average concentration of 2 ,973 pCi/kg (wet). No preoperational data were avai lable for comparison. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 3 , Appendix C) .

D. Aquatic Environmental Consulting Services, Inc. (ECS I ) collected all aquatic sam ples (with the exception of the 6S2 shoreline sediment). This sample set includes edible fish , shoreline and riverbed sediment, surface water and crab.

Surface water samples were collected offshore. The technicians collected the samples in new polyethylene containers that were rinsed twice with the sam ple medium prior to collection. The surface water samples were transported to TBE for analysis.

Edible fish were taken by gill nets wh ile crabs were caught in commercial traps. These sam ples were processed by separating the flesh from the bone and shell. The flesh was placed in sealed containers and frozen before being transported in ice chests to TBE for analysis.

Sediment samples col lected by ECSI were taken with a bottom g rab sampler and frozen in sealed polyethylene containers before being transported in ice chests to TBE. For the river bottom sediment, a marine GPS was used to locate the correct site and the sampling boat was maneuvered over the area unti l the correct amount of sample was obtained (grabbed) with the sediment dredge. Personnel from LTS col lected and prepared the location 6S2 shoreline sediment sample (an onsite location).

For this location , a square area, measuring one meter on each side was staked out and then divided into a grid of nine smaller boxes, three per side. A one inch deep scoop from the center of each of the small grids was taken . All the aliquots were combined and the total sample transported in the ice chest to TBE.

1. Surface Water Surface water samples were collected monthly at fou r indicator stations and one control station in the Delaware River Bay Estuary. One location (1 1 A1 ) is at the outfall area (which is the area where liquid radi o active effluents from SGS are discharged into the Delaware River), one is downstream from the outfall area (7E 1 ), and one is directly west of the outfall area at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River ( 1 2C1 ) . Two upstream locations are in the Delaware River ( 1 F2 ) and at the mouth of the Chesapeake and Delaware Canal ( 1 6 F 1 ), the latter being sampled when the flow is from the Canal into the river.

Station 1 2C1 , directly west, at the mouth of the Appoquinimink River, serves as the operational control. Location 1 2C 1 was chosen as the control location because the physical 30 -

characteristics of this station more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the farther upstream location

( 1 F2). As discussed in the preoperational summary report, due to the tidal nature of this Delaware River Bay Estuary, there are flow rate and salinity variations in the River. These variations will account for differences in concentrations of K-40 .

Tritium Tritiu m activity was detected in one of 48 indicator samples with a concentration of 1 760 pCi/L at location 1 1 A which is located at the SGS plant discharge. Tritium was not detected in any of the control samples. On 03/05/1 4 the Salem Unit 2 #22 Chemical Volume Control System (CVCS) Monitor Tank and Hope Creek Circulating Water Dewatering Sump were being released u nder approved permits around the time of sampling .

Reanalysis was performed and validated the initial measurement. The measured value was still far below the surface water limit of 30,000 pCi/L (801 1 1 508). The maximum preoperational level detected was 600 pCi/L , with an average concentration of 2 1 0 pCi/L (Table C-1 4, Appendix C) [Figure 2

- Tritium Activity in Surface Water 1 990 through 201 4; only the positive results are plotted and there is an inset g raph depicting the period 1 973 to 20 1 4] .

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in 1 8 of the 48 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 59 pCi/L to 1 50 pCi/L with an average concentration of 94 pCi/L, and in three of the 1 2 control station sam ples at concentrations ranging from 61 pCi/L to 1 1 3 pCi/L and an average of 87 pCi/L.

The maximum preoperational level detected for K-40 was 200 pCi/L with an average concentration of 48 pCi/L (Table C-1 5, Appendix C).

lodine-1 31 lodine-1 3 1 was not detected in any of the 48 indicator samples.

It was not detected in any of the control station samples. All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 5, Appendix C).

2. Fish Edible species of fish were collected semi-annually at two indicator stations and one control station and analyzed for gamma emitters in edible flesh . Samples included channel catfish and striped bass.

Gamma Spectrometry Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all eight indicator station sam ples at concentrations ranging from 2,862 pCi/kg (wet) to 6,348 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 4, 1 42 pCi/kg (wet), and all five control station samples at concentrations ranging from 3 ,077 pCi/kg (wet) to 4,306 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,857 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1 3 ,000 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2 ,900 pCi/kg (wet). All other gamma emitters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 6, Appendix C).

3. Blue Crab Blue crab sam ples were collected twice during the season at one indicator and one control station. The edible portions were analyzed for gamma em itters.

Gamma Spectroscopy Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in both indicator station samples at concentrations of 2,91 6 pCi/kg (wet) and 3,952 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,434 pCi/kg (wet), and in both control station samples at concentrations of 3 ,024 pCi/kg (wet) and 3 ,044 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 3,034 pCi/kg (wet). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1 2 ,000 pCi/kg (wet) with an average concentration of 2 ,835 pCilkg (wet) . All other gamma em itters were less than the MDC (Table C-1 7 , Appendix C).

4. Sediment Sedim ent samples were collected semi-annually from six indicator stations and one control station. Location 6S2 is the only shoreline sediment sample location and is directly subject to tidal fluctuations.

Gamma Spectroscopy Naturally occurring K-40 was detected in all 1 1 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 3,004 pCi/kg (dry) to 1 6,880 pCi/kg (dry), with an average concentration of 8,594 pCI/kg (dry), and at both control stations samples at concentrations of 1 4 ,480 pCi/kg (dry) and 1 5, 780 pCilkg (dry) with an average concentration of 1 5, 1 30 pCi/kg (dry). The

maximum preoperational level detected was 21 ,000 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 1 5 ,000 pCilkg (dry).

Cesium-1 37 was detected in one of the i ndicator samples at a concentration of 29 pCi!kg (dry). The maxim um preoperational level d etected was 400 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 1 50 pCi/kg (dry) (Table C-1 8 , Appendix C)

[Figure 3 , Cesium-1 37 & Cobalt-60 Activity i n Aquatic Sed i ment 1 990 through 20 1 4, plotted as semi-annual positive results, with an i nset graph depicting the period 1 977 to 201 4] .

Naturally occurring Ra-226 was detected in five of the 1 1 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 1 ,903 pCi!kg (dry) to 3,01 6 pCilkg (dry) with an average concentration of 2,343 pCilkg (dry). Naturally occurring Ra-226 was not detected in the two control station samples. The maximum preoperational level detected was 1 , 200 pCilkg (dry) with an average concentration of 760 pCi/kg (dry).

Naturally occurring Th-232 was detected in all 1 1 indicator station samples at concentrations ranging from 236 pCi/kg (dry) to 996 pCi!kg (dry) with an average concentration of 648 pCi/kg (dry), and in both of the control station samples at concentrations of 908 pCi!kg (dry) and 936 pCi/kg (dry) with an average concentration of 922 pCi/kg (dry). The maximum preoperational level detected was 1 ,300 pCilkg (dry) with an average concentration of 840 pCilkg (dry). All other gamma emitters were less than the LLD (Table C-1 8, Appendix C).

E. Land Use Survey SYNOPSIS OF 20 1 4 LAND USE CENSUS A land use census was conducted in each of the 16 meteorological sectors to identify, within a distance of 8 km (5 miles), the location of the nearest milk animal , the nearest residence and the nearest garden of g reater than 50 m 2 (500 ft2 ) prod ucing broad leaf vegetation . In accordance with SGS and HCGS ODCMs, the census was performed using a visual survey, Google Earth and by consulting with local agricultural authorities.

A comparison of the identified locations from the 20 1 4 table with the 20 1 3 table shows that there was no change to the nearest milk animal, nearest resident, or nearest vegetable garden (>500 ft2 ) with broad leaf vegetation identified . Therefore , no formal dose evaluation or changes to the SGS and HCGS O DCMs are required . The 201 4 Land Use Census results are summarized below:

Milk Nearest Vegetable An imal Residence Garden Meat Animal Meteorological August, 201 4 August, 201 4 August, 201 4 August, 20 1 4 Sector K m (miles) Km (mi les) Km (miles) Km (miles)

N None N one N one None NNE None 8.0 (5.0) N one 6.8 (4.2)

NE None 6.2 (3.9) N one None ENE None 6.2 (3.9) N one None E None N one N one None ESE None N one N one None SE None None N one None SSE None None N one None s None None N one None ssw None 6.2 (3.9) N one None sw None 6.9 (4.3) 7.3 (4.6) 7.3 (4.6)

WSW None 7.1 (4.4) N one None w 7.8 (4.9) 6.5 (4.0) N one None WNW None 5.5 (3.4) None None NW None 5.9 (3.7) None N one N NW None 6.8 (4. 2 ) None None

V. Annotations to Previous AREOR Revision 1 to the 20 1 3 Ann ual Radiological Environmental Operating Report was issued in the fourth quarter of 201 4 and made corrections at that time.

VI . Hope Creek Technical Specification Limit for Primary Water Iodine Concentrations The Hope Creek primary water chemistry results for 20 1 4 were reviewed .

The specific activity of the primary coolant did not exceed 0.2 microcuries per gram Dose Equivalent 1-1 3 1 ( D E l ) so did not exceed the Techn ical S pecifications limit specified in section 3.4.5.

VI I . Conclusions The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for SGS and HCGS was conducted d uring 201 4 in accordance with the SGS and HCGS O DCMs.

The LLD values required by the SGS and HCGS ODCMs were achieved with m inor exceptions for this reporting period (See Appendix A and Appendix C).

The objectives of the program were also met during this period. The data collected assist in demonstrating that SGS and HCGS were operated in compliance with the SGS and the HCGS ODCMs' requirements.

The concentration of radioactive material in the environment that could be attributable to SGS and HCGS operations was only a small fraction, when com pared to the concentration of naturally occurring and man-made radioactivity in the environment. Since these results were comparable to the results obtained during the preoperational phase of the program , which ran from 1 973 to 1 976, and with historical results collected since com mercial operation , PS EG N uclear Personnel have concluded that the operation of the SGS and HCGS had no significant rad iological impact on the environment.

From the resu lts obtained, it can be concluded that the levels and fluctuations of radioactivity in environmental samples were as expected .

VI I I . References

[1 ] Radiation Management Corporation . "Artificial Island Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - Preoperation Summary - 1 973 through 1 976". RMC-TR-77-03, 1 978.

[2] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Manuai" Salem Generating Station . Revision 27.

[3] Public Service Enterprise Group. "Offsite Dose Calculation Man uai" Hope Creek Generating Station . Revision 27.

[4] U . S . N uclear Regu latory Comm ission : N U REG-1 301 , "Offsite Dose Calculation Man ual Guidance: Standard Rad iological Effluent Controls for Pressurized Water Reactors", published Apri1 1 991 .

[5] U . S . Nuclear Regu latory Commission : N U REG-1 302, "Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Guidance: Standard Radiological Effluent Controls for Boiling Water Reactors", published April 1 991 .

I ntentionally left blank

APP E N DIX A RAD IOLOG I CAL E NVI RO N M E NTAL M O N ITO RI N G P ROG RAM S U M MARY A-1

Intentionally left blank SAMPLE DESIGNATION The PSEG's Laboratory &Testing Services (L TS) identifies sam ples by a th ree part code. 1 ) The first two letters are the program identification code. Because of the proximity of the Salem and Hope Creek Stations a com mon environmental surveillance program is conducted . The identification code, "SA", has been applied to Salem and Hope Creek stations. 2) The next three letters identify the media sam pled .

AIO = Air Iodine IDM = I m mersion Dose (TLD)

APT = Air Particulate MLK = M ilk ECH = Hard Shell Blue Crab PWR = Potable Water (Raw)

ESF = Ed ible Fish PWT = Potable Water (Treated )

ESS = Sediment SOL = Soil FPL = Green Leaf Vegetables SWA = Surface Water FPV = Vegetables (Various) VGT = Fodder Crops (Various)

GAM = Game (Muskrat) WWA= Well Water

3) The last three or four symbols are a location code based on direction and distance from a standard reference point. The reference point is located at the midpoint between the center of the Salem Unit 1 and Salem Un it 2 containments. Of these, the first one or two represent each of the sixteen angular sectors of 22.5 degrees centered about the reactor site. Sector one is divided evenly by the north axis and other sectors are numbered in a clockwise direction as follows:

1 = N 5 = E 9 =S 13 =w 2 = NNE 6 = ESE 10 = ssw 14 = WNW 3 = NE 7 = SE 11 = sw 15 = NW 4 = ENE 8 = SSE 12 = WSW 16 = NNW The next digit is a letter wh ich represents the radial distance from the reference point:

s = On-site location E = 4-5 mi les off-site A = 0-1 mi les off-site F = 5-1 0 miles off-site B = 1 -2 mi les off-site G = 1 0-20 miles off-site c = 2-3 mi les off-site H = >20 miles off-site D = 3-4 miles off-site The last n umber is the station n umerical designation with in each sector and zone; e.g . ,

1 ,2,3, . . . etc. For example, the designation SA-WWA-3E 1 would indicate a sample in the Salem and Hope Creek program (SA) consisting of well water (WWA) which had been collected in sector number 3, centered at 45 degrees (north east) with respect to the midpoint between Salem 1 and 2 containments at a radial distance of 4 to 5 miles off site, (therefore, radial distance E). The number 1 indicates that this is sampling station nu mber 1 in that particular sector.

A-3

Intentionally left blank A-4

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-3 1 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCA l iON WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION N UMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN N O N ROUTI N E (UNIT O F MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DI RECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORME D (LLD)* ** MEASUREMENTS

! . AIRBOR N E A I R PARTICULATE G R-B 4 1 6 10 1 3 (362/364) SA-APT-1 5S2 1 4 (52152) 14 (52152) 0 (E-3 pCi/m") (4/28) 0.59 MILES NW (7/20) (7/20)

GAMMA 32 BE-7 NA 97 (28/28) SA-APT-2F6 1 08 (4/4) 1 01 (4/4) 0 (59/139) 7.3 MILES NNE (94/1 22) (88/1 14)

K-40 NA 32 (1/28) SA-APT-16E1 32 ( 1 /4) <LLD 0 4.1 M I LES NNW

)>

I 01 CS-134 50 <LLD -

<LLD 0 CS-137 60 <LLD <LLD 0 AIR IODINE GAMMA 416 (E-3 pCi/m3) 1-1 31 70 <LLD <LLD 0 II. DIRECT DIRECT RADIATION TLD-QUARTERLY 232 NA 14.6 (208/208) SA-IDM-1 6S2 38.8 (4/4) 14.0 (24/24) 0 (mR!standard quarter) (9.1 /42.4) 0.6 MILES N OF SITE (36.0/42.4) (1 0.2/17.0)

IlL TERRESTRIAL M I LK 1-1 31 80 1 <LLD <LLD 0 (pCi/L)

GAMMA 80 K-40 NA 1 353 (60/60) SA-MLK-1 4F4 1 388 (20/20) 1295 (20/20) 0 (1 1 5 1 /1 585) 7.6 MILES WNW (1 269/1 579) (1 061 /1 430)

-*---- - --------*---

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW .JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSI S AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMEN1) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* **

MEASUREMENTS MILK (cont'd) CS-134 15 <LLD <LLD 0 (pCi!L)

CS-1 37 18 <LLD - <LLD 0 BALA-140 15 <LLD - <LLD 0 RA-226 NA <LLD - <LLD 0

)>

I m

WELL WATER GR-A 12 3 <LLD - NA 0 (pCi/L)

GR-8 12 4 <LLD - NA 0 H-3 12 200 <LLD NA 0 GAMMA 12 K-40 NA <LLD - NA 0 MN-54 15 <LLD - NA 0 C0-58 15 <LLD NA 0 FE-59 30 <LLD - NA 0

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-3 1 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) D ISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE} (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)*

MEASUREMENTS WELL WA1ER (cont'd) C0-60 15 <LLD NA 0 (pCi!L)

ZN-65 30 <LLD NA 0 ZRNB-95 15 <LLD NA 0 1-1 31 1 <LLD NA 0

)>

I

-....J CS-134 15 <LLD - NA 0 CS-1 37 18 <LLD NA 0 BALA-140 15 <LLD NA 0 RA-226 NA <LLD NA 0 POTABLE WATER GR-A 24 3 <LLD NA 0 (pCi/L)

GR-B 24 4 5.4 (22/24) SA-PWT-2F3 5.5 (12/12) NA 0 (3.0/8.1) 8.0 M I LES NNE (3.0/8.1)

H-3 24 200 <LLD NA 0

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HlGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND D IRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* **

MEASUREMENTS POTABLE WATER (cont'd) GAMMA 24 (pCi!L) K-40 NA <LLD - NA 0 MN-54 15 <LLD NA 0 C0-58 15 <LLD - NA 0

)>

' FE-59 30 <LLD NA 0 (X)

C0-60 15 <LLD NA 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD - NA 0 ZRNB-95 15 <LLD - NA 0 1-1 31 1 <LLD NA 0 CS-134 15 <LLD NA 0 CS-1 37 18 <LLD NA 0 BALA-140 15 <LLD - NA 0

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-3 1 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* -

MEASUREMENTS POTABLE WATER (cont'd) RA-226 NA <LLD NA 0 (pCiJL)

VEGETATION GAMMA 74 (pCi/kg wet) BE-7 NA 246 (1 1 !62) SA-FPL-1 0D1 286 (2/7) <LLD 0 (1 79!363) 3.9 M I LES SSW (209/363)

K-40 NA 3775 (62/62) SA-FPL-7S1 61 89 (2/2) 2353 (12/12) 0 (1655/6784) (5968/641 0) (1 626/3267)

)>

I 1-1 31 60 <LLD <LLD 0

<0 CS-134 60 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-137 80 <LLD <LLD 0 RA-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0 TH-232 NA <LLD <LLD 0 FODDER CROPS GAMMA 4 (pCilkg wet) BE-7 NA 249 (2/3) SA-VGT-2G3 265 (1/1) <LLD 0 (233!265) 1 1 .8 MILES NNE K-40 NA 3790 (3/3) SA-VGT-2G3 4532 (1/1) 1 61 0 (1/1) 0

{3036/4532) 1 1 .8 M I LES NNE 1-1 31 60 <LLD - <LLD 0

- - ------- - - **--*-- - ------

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COuNTY, NEW JERSEY Jannary 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* **

MEASUREMENTS FODDER CROPS (cont'd) CS-134 60 <LLD - <LLD 0 (pCi/kg wet)

CS-1 37 80 <LLD - <LLD 0 RA-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0 TH-232 NA <LLD - <LLD 0

)>

'

....:..

0 ANIMAL GAMMA 3 (pCi/kg wet) BE-7 NA <LLD NA 0 K-40 NA 2973 (3/3) SA-GAM-3E1 3274 (1/1) NA 0 (281 1/3274) 1-1 31 60 <LLD - NA 0 CS-134 60 <LLD - NA 0 CS-137 80 <LLD NA 0 IV. AQUATIC SURFACE WATER H-3 60 200 1 760 (1/48) SA-SWA-1 1 A1 1 760 (1/12) <LLD 0 (pCi/L) 0.2 MILES SW

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-3 1 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL N UMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED

PERFORMED (LLD)* MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (cont'd) GAMMA 60 (pCi/L) K-40 NA 12 SA-SWA-1 F2 1 09 (2/12) 87 (3/12) 0 (59/1 50) 7.1 MILES N (68/1 50) (61/1 1 3)

M N-54 15 <LLD <LLD 0 C0-58 15 <LLD - <LLD 0 FE-59 30 <LLD <LLD 0

)>

I

....>.

C0-60 15 <LLD <LLD 0 ZN-65 30 <LLD - <LLD 0 ZRNB-95 15 <LLD - <LLD 0 1-1 31 1 <LLD <LLD 0 CS-134 15 <LLD - <LLD 0 CS-137 18 <LLD - <LLD 0 BALA-140 15 <LLD <LLD 0

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GE:t'I""ERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* **

MEASUREMENTS SURFACE WATER (cont'd) 1-131 60 1 <LLD - <LLD 0 (pCi/L)

FISH GAMMA 13 (pCi/kg wet) K-40 NA 4142 (8/8) SA-ESF-7E1 41 81 (4/4) 3857 (5/5) 0 (2862/6348) 4.5 MILES SE (31 06/6348) (3077/4306)

MN-54 1 30 <LLD <LLD 0

)>

'

C0-58 130 <LLD <LLD 0 N

FE-59 260 <LLD - <LLD 0 C0-60 1 30 <LLD - <LLD 0 ZN-65 260 <LLD - <LLD 0 CS-134 1 30 <LLD - <LLD 0 CS-137 1 50 <LLD - <LLD 0 RA-226 NA <LLD <LLD 0 BLUE CRABS GAMMA 4 (pCi/kg wet) K-40 NA 3434 (2/2) SA-ECH-1 1 A1 3434 (2/2) 3034 (2/2) 0 (291 6/3952) 0.2 MILES SW (291 6/3952) (3024/3044)

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED

PERFORMED (LLD)* MEASUREMENTS BLUE CRABS (cont'd) M N-54 1 30 <LLD <LLD 0 (pCi/kg wet)

C0-58 1 30 <LLD <LLD 0 FE-59 260 <LLD - <LLD 0 C0-60 1 30 <LLD <LLD 0

)>

I

-->.

w ZN-65 260 <LLD - <LLD 0 CS-134 1 30 <LLD - <LLD 0 CS-137 1 50 <LLD - <LLD 0 RA-226 NA <LLD -

<LLD 0 SEDIMENT GAMMA 13 (pCi/kg dry) BE-7 NA <LLD - <LLD 0 K-40 NA 8594 (1 1/1 1) SA-ESS-16F1 1 6475 (2/2) 1 5 1 30 (2/2) 0 (3004/1 6880) 6.9 M I LES NNW (1 6070/1 6880) (14480/15780)

CS-134 1 50 <LLD - <LLD 0

---*'- ---*-*- - --- ---- - *--

- ---*-

TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

SALEM GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272/-31 1 HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-354 SALEM COUNTY, NEW JERSEY January 1, 2014 f{) December 31, 2014 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NUMBER OF SAMPLED TOTAL NUMBER LIMIT OF MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)* **

MEASUREMENTS SEDIMENT (cont'd) CS-137 1 80 29 (1/1 1 ) SA-ESS-1 1A1 29 (1/2) <LLD 0 (pCi/kg dry) 0.2 MILES SW RA-226 NA 2343 (5/1 1 ) SA-ESS-1 6A1 2523 (2/2) <LLD 0 (1 903/301 6) 0.24 MILES NNW (2030/301 6)

TH-232 NA 648 (1 1/1 1 ) SA-ESS-12C1 C 922 (2/2) 922 (2/2) 0 (236/996) 2.5 MILES WSW (908/936) (908/936)

p-

_,.

LLD USTED IS TIIE LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION WHICH WE ENDEAVORED TO ACHIEVE DURING THIS REPORTING PERIOD.

- MEAN CALCULATED USING VALVES ABOVE LLD ONLY. FRACTION OF MEASUREMENTS ABOVE LLD ARE IN PARENTIIESES.

AP P E N D IX B SAM P L E D E S I G NATION AN D LOCATI ONS B-1

I ntentionally left blank B-2

TABLE B-1 SAM P L I N G LOCATIONS Specific information about the individual sampling locations are given in Table B-1 . Maps B-1 and B-2 show the locations of sampling stations with respect to the Site. A Portable Global Positioning System (GPS) was used to provide the coordinates of sampling locations.

All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

1 S1 0.55 mi. N 39 - 28.260 75 - 32.222 IDM, FPL 2S2 0.40 mi. NNE; lamp pole 65 near HC switch yard 39 - 28.98 75 - 32.1 0 IOM 2S4 0.60 mi. NNE; in the equipment laydown area 39 - 28. 1 1 0 75 - 31 .992 IDM 3S1 0.58 mi. NE 39 - 28.140 75 - 31 .678 IOM 4S1 0.60 mi. ENE; site access road near intersection to TB-02 39 - 28.023 75 - 31 .544 IOM OJ

' 39 - 27.668 75 - 3 1 . 1 87 IDM, AIO, APT

(,..) 5S1 0.86 mi. E; site access road 5S2 0.86 mi. E; site access road, duplicate sample 39 - 27.668 75 - 31 . 1 87 AIO, APT 6S2 0.23mi. ESE; area around helicopter pad 39 - 27.719 75 - 31 .912 !OM, ESS, SOL 7S1 0.12 mi. SE; station personnel gate 39 - 27.720 75 - 32.1 5 IDM, AIO, APT, FPL 8S1 0.12 mi. SSE; fuel oil storage 39 - 27.676 75 - 32.055 IDM 9S1 0.12 mi. S; fuel oil storage 39 - 27.636 75 - 32.091 IOM 1 0S1 0.14 mi. SSW; circulating water building 39 - 27.700 75 - 32.160 IOM 1 1S1 0.09 mi. SW; circulating water building 39 - 27.71 9 75 - 32.225 IDM 1 2S1 0.09 mi. WSW; outside security fence 39 - 27.756 75 - 32.236 IOM 1 3S 1 0.09 mi. W ; outside security fence 39 - 27.801 75 - 32.267 IOM 14S1 0. 1 0 mi. NNW; outside security fence 39 - 27.893 75 - 32.280 IDM 1 5Si 0.57 mi. NW; near river and barge slip 39 - 28.1 61 75 - 32.525 IDM, FPV 1 5S2 0.59 mi. NW; near river 39 - 28.1 2 75 - 32.32 IDM, AIO, APT, FPL 1 6S1 0.57 mi. NNW; on road near fuel oil storage tank 39 - 28.215 75 - 32.432 IDM, FPL 1 6S2 0.60 mi. NNW; near security firing range 39 - 28.1 6 75 - 32.1 7 IDM, FPL 1 6S3 1 .0 mi. NNW; consolidated spoils facility 39 - 28.350 75 - 32.550 I OM*

1 1A1 0.20 mi. SW; Salem outfall area 39 - 27.59 75 - 32.25 ESS, SWA, ECH, ESF 1 1A1A 0.1 5 mi. SE; Located in the plant barge slip area 39 - 27.41 75 - 32.02 Alternate SWA

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

SAM P LING LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to b e collected at all possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

1 5A1 0.65 mi. NW; Hope Creek outfall area 39 - 27.67 75 - 32 . 1 9 ESS 1 6A1 0.24 mi. NNW; South Storm Drain outfall 39 - 28.24 75 - 32.58 ESS 5C1 3.14 mi. ENE 39 - 28.250 75 - 28.430 GAM 1 2C1 2.5 mi. WSW; West bank of Delaware River 39 - 27.22 75 - 34.08 ESS, SWA, ECH, ESF 1 2C1A 3. 7 mi. WSW; Located at the tip of Augustine Beach Boat Ramp 39 - 30.17 75 - 34.48 Alternate SWA 402 3.7 mi. ENE; Alloway Creek Neck Road 39 - 29.292 75 - 28.175 IOM 501 3.5 mi. E; local farm 39 - 28.396 75 - 28.334 IDM, AIO, APT 1 001 3.9 m i SSW; Taylor's Bridge Spur

. 39 - 24.61 3 75 - 33.733 IDM, FPL, SOL OJ I 1401 3.4 m i. WNW; Bay View, Delaware 39 - 29.26 75 - 35.521 IDM

1 501 3.8 mi NW; Route 9, Augustine Beach, DE 39 - 30.125 75 - 35.28 IOM 2E1 4.4 mi. N NE; local farm 39 - 31 .380 75 - 30.428 IOM 3E1 4.2 mi. N E; local farm 39 - 30.098 75 - 28.646 IDM, WWA 7E1 4.5 mi. SE; River Bank 1 .0 mi. W of Mad Horse Creek 39 - 25.08 75 - 28.64 ESS, SWA, ESF 7E1A 8.87 mi. SE; Located at the end of Bayside Road 39 - 22.57 75 - 24.24 Alternate SWA 1 1 E2 5.0 mi. SW; Route 9 39 - 24.328 75 - 35.546 !OM 1 2 E1 4.4 mi. WSW; Thomas landing 39 - 26.862 75 - 36.968 IOM 1 3E1 4.2 mi. W; Diehl House lab 39 - 27.989 75 - 36.735 IOM 1 3E3 5.0 mi. W; local farm 39 - 27. 1 7 75 - 37.30 MLK, FPL, VGT, SOL 1 6E1 4.1 mi. NNW; Port Penn 39 - 30.762 75 - 34.580 I OM, AIO, APT, SOL 1 F1 5.8 mi. N; Fort Elfsborg 39 - 32.693 75 - 3 1 . 1 24 IDM, AIO, APT, 1 F2 7.1 mi. N; midpoint of Delaware R. 39 - 33.08 75 - 32.54 SWA 2F2 8.5 mi. NNE; Salem Substation 39 - 34.522 75 - 28.120 IOM 2F3 8.0 mi. NNE; City of Salem Water and Sewage Department 39 - 33.40 75 - 27.1 8 PWR, PWT 2F5 7.4 mi. NNE; Salem High School 39 - 33.448 75 - 28.514 IOM 2F6 7.3 mi. N N E; PSE&G Training Center, Salem NJ 39 - 33.713 75 - 28.81 9 I OM, AIO, APT 2F9 7.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm , Tilbury Rd, Salem 39 - 33.55 75 - 29.30 FPV, SOL

TABLE B-1 (cont'd)

SAM P LI N G LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at all possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED DEG. MIN. DEG. MIN.

2F1 0 9.2 mi. NNE; Local Farm, South Broadway (Route 49) Pennsville 39 - 35.35 75 - 29.35 FPV, FPL 3F2 5.1 mi. NE; Hancocks Bridge, NJ Munc Bldg 39 - 30.4 1 0 75 - 27.578 IDM 3F3 8.6 mi. NE; Quinton Township Elem. School NJ 39 - 32.616 75 - 24.735 IDM 3F6 6.5 mi. NE; Local Farm, Salem/Hancocks Bridge Road 39 - 32.03 75 - 28.00 FPV 3F7 7.2 mi. NE; Local Farm, Beasley Neck Road, RD#3 39 - 32.07 75 - 25.46 FPV 3F8 9.3 mi. NE; Circle M Orchard 39 - 33.987 75 - 25.468 FPV 4F2 6.0 mi. ENE; Mays Lane, Harmersville, NJ 39 - 29.953 75 - 26.076 IDM OJ 5F1 6.5 mi. E; Canton, NJ 39 - 28.360 75 - 25.031 IDM,SOL I

U1 6F1 6.4 mi. ESE; Stow Neck Road 39 - 26.396 75 - 25.1 48 IDM 7F2 9.1 mi. SE; Bayside, NJ 39 - 22.971 75 - 24.261 IDM 8F1 9.7 mi. SE; Woodland Beach, DE 39 - 1 9.933 75 - 28.463 IDM 9F1 5.3 mi. S; off Route #9, DE 39 - 23.042 75 - 32.95 IDM 1 0F2 5.8 mi. SSW; Route #9, DE 39 - 23.034 75 - 34.1 52 IDM 1 1 F1 6.2 mi. SW; Taylor's Bridge, DE 39 - 24.766 75 - 37.632 IDM 1 2F1 9.4 mi. WSW; Townsend Elementary School, DE 39 - 23.778 75 - 41 .31 1 IDM 1 3F2 6.5 mi W; Odessa, DE 39 - 27.297 75 - 39.372 IDM 1 3F3 9.3 mi. W; Redding Middle School, Middletown, Delaware 39 - 27.2 1 5 75 - 42.543 IDM 1 3F4 9.8 mi. W ; Middletown, DE 39 - 26.857 75 - 43.1 1 1 IDM 1 4F2 6.7 mi. WNW; Route 1 3 and Boyds Comer Rd 39 - 29.979 75 - 39.042 IDM 1 4F4 7.6 mi. WNW; local farm 39 - 30.44 75 - 40.52 MLK, VGT, SOL 1 5F3 5.4 mi. NW 39 - 30.987 75 - 36.586 IDM 1 5F4 7.0 mi. NW; local farm; Port Penn Road; Delaware 39 - 3 1 .21 75 - 38.31 FPV 1 6F 1 6.9 mi. NNW; C&D Canal 39 - 33.55 75 - 34.25 ESS, SWA 1 6F 1 A 6.84 mi. NNW; Located at the C&D Canal Tip 39 - 33.34 75 - 33.56 Alternate SWA

----------- - - - - - - -- - - - -*-

TABLE B-1 {cont'd)

SAM P L I N G LOCATIONS All sample types are not required to be collected at a n possible sites every year (see Table B-2 for sample locations this year).

STATION CODE STATION LOCATION LATITUDINAL LONGITUDINAL MEDIA SAMPLED DEG. M I N . DEG. MIN.

1 6F2 8.1 mi. NNW; Delaware City Public School 39 - 34.31 4 75 - 35.429 !OM 1G1 1 0.9 mi. NNE; Route 49, South Broadway 39 - 37.1 1 3 75 - 30. 1 78 FPV 1 G3 1 9 mi. N; N. Church Street Wilmington, Del 39 - 44287 75 - 32.512 IDM 1 3.5 mi. NNE; Local Farm; Pointers Auburn Road (Route 540),

2G2 39 - 38.1 9 75 - 26.1 0 FPV Salem, NJ 08079 2G3 1 1 .8 mi. NNE; Local Milk Farm 39 - 36.21 75 - 24.53 MLK, VGT, SOL 1 1 .3 mi. NNE; large family g arden; Route 45 & Welchville Road, 2G4 39 - 36.02 75 - 25.21 FPV Mannington, NJ 3G1 1 7 mi. NE; local farm 39 - 35.91 3 75 - 1 6.804 IDM, MLK, VGT, SOL OJ 1 0.3 mi. S; Local Farm, Woodland Beach Road., Smyrna, I 9Gi 39 - 18.47 75 - 33.50 FPV

0) Delaware 1 0.7 mi. S; Local Farm, Woodland Beach Road, Smyrna, 39 - 1 8.39 75 - 34.1 1 FPV 9G2 Delaware 1 0G1 1 2 mi. SSW; Smyrna, Delaware 39 - 1 8.223 75 - 36.095 IDM 1 4G 1 1 1 .8 mi. WNW; Route 286, Bethel Church Road., DE 39 - 31 .290 75 - 46.495 AIO,APT, IDM 1 6G1 1 5 mi. NNW; Wilmington Airport 39 - 40.637 75 - 35.570 IDM 3H1 32 mi. NE; National Park, NJ 39 - 51 .599 75 - 1 1 .96 IDM 3H5 25 mi. NE; Farm Market, Route 77 39 - 41 .040 75 - 1 2.380 FPV NOTE: All station locations are referenced to the midpoint of the two Salem Units' Containments. The coordinates of this location are: Latitude N 39° - 27' - 46.5" and Longitude W 75° - 32' -

10.6".

All Vegetables (FPV & FPL) and Vegetation (VGT) are management audit samples. They are not required by the Salem & Hope Creek Stations' Technical Specifications nor listed in the Stations ODCMs. Vegetable samples are not always collected in consecutive years from the same farmer due to crop rotation.

TABLE 8-2 SALEM AND HOPE CREEK G E N E RATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRO N M ENTAL M O N ITORI NG PRO G RAM (Program Overview)

SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAM PLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS 1 . DI RECT RADIATION Fifty-eight routine monitoring stations with two or Quarterly Gamma dose/ q uarterly more dosimeters placed as follows:

Dosimeters An inner ring of stations, at least one in meteorological sector in the general area of the site boundary.

OJ I

......

An outer ring of stations, at least one in each meteorological sector in the 3.4 6.4 m ile range

-

from the site <1l.

The balance of the stations placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, and schools and in six areas beyond 1 0 miles to serve as control stations.

- ------

TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CREEK GENERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVI RONMENTAL M O N ITORING PROG RAM SAMP LING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY N UMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

2. ATMOSPHERIC

a. Air Particulate 3 samples from close to the Site Boundary: 5S1 , 7S1 , Continuous sampler Gross Beta I weekly 1 6S 1 . operation with sample Gamma isotopic analysis I One d uplicate sample from close to the site boundary: collection weekly or more q uarterly composite 5S2. frequently if required by dust loading 3 Samples in different land based sectors: 1 F 1 , 2F6, OJ 501 .

'

CXl

b. Air Iodine lodine-1 31 / weekly 1 Sample from the vicinity of a comm unity: 1 6E1 .

1 Sample from a control location; for example 1 5 - 30 km d istant (9.3 - 1 8. 6 miles) and in the least prevalent wind direction: 1 4G 1 .

3. TERRESTRIAL

a. Milk Samples from milking animals i n 3 locations within 5 km Semi-monthly Gamma scan I semi-monthly distance (3. 1 m iles). If there are none, then 1 sample (when animals are on lodine-1 31 / semi-monthly from milking animals in each of 3 areas between 5 - 8 km pasture) distant (3. 1 - 5.0 miles): 1 3E3, 1 4F4, 2G3 <2l .

Gamma scan I monthly 1 Sample from milking animals at a control location 1 5 - Monthly 30 km d istant (9.3 - 1 8.6 miles): 3G1 . lodine-1 31 / monthly (when animals are on pasture)

TABLE 8-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AN D HOPE CREEK G E N E RATI N G STATIONS' RADIOLOG I CAL ENVIRONMENTAL M O N ITORIN G P ROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY N UMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* O F AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

b. Well Water (Ground) Samples from one or two sources only if likely to be Monthly Gamma scan I monthly affected (although wells in the vicinity of SGS/HCGS are Gross alpha I monthly not directly affected by plant operations, 3E1 farm's well, is Gross beta I monthly sampled as management audit sample) . Tritium I monthly

c. Potable Water One sample of the nearest water supply affected by its Monthly (composited Gross alpha I monthly (Drinking Water) discharge (no potable water samples are required as liquid daily) Gross beta I monthly effluents discharged from SGS/HCGS do not directly affect Tritium I monthly OJ this pathway). However, for management audit samples, I Gamma scan I monthly co one raw and one treated sample from a public water supply (City of Salem Water and Sewer Department) is collected: lodine-1 31 I monthly 2F3.

d . Vegetables One sample of each principal class of food products from Annually (at harvest) Gamma scan I on collection area that is irrigated by water in which liquid plant wastes have been discharged (the Delaware River at the location of SGS/HCGS is a brackish water source and is not used for irrigation of food products). Management audit samples are collected from various locations during harvest: 2F9, 1 G 1 , 2G2 and 3H5. In addition, broad leaf vegetation (cabbage and collards) was collected from 1 0D 1 and 1 G1 as well as being planted & collected onsite (1 S 1 , 7S1 ,

1 5S2, 1 6S 1 ) . This is in lieu of having a milk farm within 5 c2>

km (3. 1 miles) of the Site .

----*-- - -- - - - -- --- ---- ---*

TABLE B-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE CRE E K G E N ERATING STATIONS' RADIOLOG ICAL ENVI RO N M ENTAL MONITORING P ROG RAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* OF AND/OR SAMPLE SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

e. Fodder Crops Althou g h not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, a sample of Annually (at harvest) Gamma scan I on collection crops normally used as cattle feed (silage) were collected from our m ilk farms as management audit samples: 1 4F4, 3G1 , 2G3, 1 3E3.

f. Soil Althou g h not required by SGS/HCGS ODCM, samples of Eve ry 3 years Gamma scan I on soil are collected as managem ent audit samples: 6S2, (201 0-201 3-201 6) collection 2F9, 5F1 , 1 0D 1 , 1 6E 1 , 1 3E3, 1 4F4, 2G3, 3G1 OJ (no samples collected in 201 4) .

I

....>.

0

4. AQUATIC ENVIRON MENT Gamma scan I monthly

a. Surface Water Monthly One sample upstream: 1 F2. Tritium I monthly**

One sample downstream : 7E1 .

One sample outfall: 1 1A 1 .

One sample cross-stream (mouth of Appoquinimink River):

<3l 12C1 .

And an additional location in the Chesapeake & Delaware Canal: 1 6F1 .

b. Edible Fish One sample of each commercially and recreationally Semi Gamma scan (flesh) I on important species in vicinity of plant discharg e area: 1 1A1 . annually collection g

One sample of same s ecies in area not influenced by 3l plant discharge: 1 2C 1 .

And an additional location downstream : 7E1 .

TABLE 8-2 (cont'd)

SALEM AND HOPE C RE E K G E N ERATI NG STATIONS' RADIOLOGICAL ENVI RONMENTAL MON ITO RING P ROGRAM SAMPLING AND EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND SAMPLE COLLECTION TYPE/FREQUENCY* O F AND/OR SAMPLE LOCATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS

c. Blue Crabs One sample of each commercially and recreationally Semi Gamma scan (flesh) /on important species in vicinity of plant discharge area 1 1A 1 . annually collection One sample of same species in area not influenced by

<3J plant discharge 1 2C 1 _

OJ One sample from downstream area: 7E1 . Semi Gamma scan I on collection I d. Sediment One sample from cross-stream area and control location: annually

<3) 1 2C 1 .

One sample from outfall area: 1 1A 1 .

One sample from upstream, the C & D Canal: 1 6F1 .

One sample from shoreline area: 6S2.

One sample from Cooling Tower Slowdown d ischarge:

1 5A1 .

One sample south storm drain discharge line: 1 6A1 .

Except for Dosimeters, the q uarterly analysis is performed on a composite of individual samples collected d uring the quarter.

- Technical S pecifications and ODCM require quarterly analysis but due to the tritium leak at Salem, it was decided to a nalyze surface waters on a monthly basis for tritium.

(1) Range of 3.4 - 6.4 miles based on ODCM Appendix E REMP Sample Locations Table and Figures (20686360).

(2) While these milk locations are not within the 5 km range, they are the closest farms in the Site vicinity.

Since broad leaf vegetation is acceptable in lieu of milk collections, LTS personnel planted and harvested cabbage at three locations on Site ( 1 S 1 , 1 5S 1 , 1 6 S 1 ) and one in Delaware (10D1).

(3) Station 1 2C 1 was made the operational control (1 975) for aquatic samples since the physical characteristics of this station more closely resemble those of the outfall area than do those at the upstream location originally chosen. This is due to the distance from Liston Point, which is the boundary between the Delaware River and Delaware Bay. As discussed extensively in the SGSIHCGS Pre-operational reports, the sampling locations further upstream show significantly lower background levels due to estuarine tidal flow.

MAP B-1 SALEM AN D HOPE C R E E K G E N E RATI N G STATIONS' RAD I O LOG ICAL ENVIRON M E NTAL M O N ITO RI N G P RO G RAM ON-SITE SAM P L I N G LOCATIONS 9

B-1 2

MAP B-2 SALE M AN D H O P E C R E E K G E N E RATI N G STATIONS' RAD I O LOG ICAL E NVI RO N M E NTAL M O N ITORI N G P ROG RAM OF F-S ITE SAM P LI N G LOCATIONS B-1 3

Intentionally left blank B-1 4

APP E N D IX C DATA TAB LES C-1

I ntentionally left blank C-2

TABLE C-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICU LATES 3

Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCi/m +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION ID START STOP Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 SA-APT-1 4G1 (C ) 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/1 4 1 14 +/- 24 < 28 < 2 < 1 04/02/1 4 - 06/30/ 1 4 1 06 +/- 23 < 29 < 2 < 2 06/30/1 4 - 09/29/1 4 88 +/- 21 < 29 < 2 < 2 09/29/1 4 - 1 2/29/14 95 +/- 26 < 25 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 1 01 +/- 22 SA-APT-1 5S2 12/30/ 1 3 - 04/02/1 4 91 +/- 29 < 28 < 2 < 2 04/02/1 4 - 06/30/1 4 1 39 +/- 33 < 27 < 2 < 2 06/30/14 - 09/29/1 4 82 +/- 28 < 25 < 2 < 2 09/29/14 - 1 2/29/14 67 +/- 26 < 28 < 2 < 'I AVERAGE' 95 +/- 62 SA-AP T-16E1 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/1 4 1 06 +/- 30 < 12 < 1 < 1 04/02/1 4 - 06/30/ 1 4 96 +/- 28 < 35 < 2 < 1 06/30/14 - 09/29/14 99 +/- 29 32 +/- 1 5 < 2 < 2 09/29/1 4 - 1 2/29/14 84 +/- 24 < 27 < 1 < 1 AVERAGE* 96 +/- 1 8 32 +/- 0 SA-APT-1 F1 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/14 90 +/- 26 < 34 < 3 < 2 04/02/1 4 - 06/30/14 92 +/- 20 < 21 < 1 < 2 06/30/1 4 - 09/29/14 1 03 +/- 33 < 16 < 2 < 2 09/29/1 4 - '1 2/29/1 4 74 +/- 39 < 46 < 2 < 3 AVERAGE* 90 +/- 24 SA-APT-2F6 12/30/1 3 - 04/02/1 4 1 01 +/- 26 < 24 < 2 < 1 04/02/1 4 - 06/30/1 4 1 22 +/- 28 < 31 < 2 < 2 06/30/14 - 09/29/1 4 113 +/- 34 < 30 < 2 < 2 09/29/1 4 - 1 2/29/14 94 +/- 27 < 26 < 2 < 1 AVERAGE* 1 08 +/- 25 SA-APT-5D1 1 2/30/1 3 - 04/02/14 1 16 +/- 22 < 12 < 1 < 1 04/02/1 4 - 06/30/1 4 1 05 +/- 31 < 15 < 2 < 2 06/30/14 - 09/29/1 4 89 +/- 39 < 14 < 2 < 2 09/29/1 4 - 1 2/29/14 87 +/- 36 < 34 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 99 +/- 28

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (G) CONTROL STATION C-3

TABLE C-1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCilm 3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION I D START STOP Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-APT-5S1 1 2/30/1 3 - 04/02/1 4 111 +/- 36 < 31 < 2 < 2 04/02/1 4 - 06/30/1 4 1 30 +/- 31 < 35 < 2 < 2 06/30/14 - 09/29/ 1 4 96 +/- 23 < 26 < 2 < 1 09/29/ 1 4 - 1 2/29/1 4 59 +/- 28 < 13 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 99 +/- 60 SA-APT-7S1 1 2/30/ 1 3 - 04/02/1 4 91 +/- 23 < 14 < 1 < 1 04/02/1 4 - 06/30/14 1 05 +/- 42 < 30 < 3 < 3 06/30/14 - 09/29/1 4 1 03 +/- 31 < 37 < 3 < 2 09/29/1 4 - 1 2/29/ 1 4 76 +/- 28 < 39 < 2 < 2 AVERAGE* 94 +/- 27

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-4

TABLE C*2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS BETA EM ITTERS IN AIR PARTICU LATES Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION P E RIOD CONTROL GROUP I START STOP SA-APT-1 4G 1 SA-APT-1 F1 SA-APT-2F6 SA-APT-5D1 SA-APT-581 SA-APT-781 1 2/30/ 1 3 - 01 /06/ 1 4 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 0 1 /06/ 1 4 - 0 1 /1 3/ 1 4 17 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 22 +/- 4 0 1 / 1 3/ 1 4 - 0 1 /20/ 1 4 17 +/- 4 16 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 19 +/- 4 0 1 /20/ 1 4 - 0 1 /27/ 1 4 14 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 < 22 (1) 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 0 1 /27/ 1 4 - 02/03/1 4 16 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 02/03/ 1 4 - 02/1 0/ 1 4 17 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 20 +/- 3 17 +/- 4 02/ 1 0/14 - 02/ 1 8/ 1 4 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 02/ 1 8/ 1 4 - 02/24/ 1 4 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 4 8 +/- 3 12 +/- 4 10 +/- 3 15 +/- 4 02/24/ 1 4 - 03/04/ 1 4 20 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 20 +/- 3 21 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 03/04/ 1 4 - 03/1 0/14 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 19 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 03/1 0/14 - 03/1 8/14 14 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 03/18/14 - 03/25/ 1 4 10 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 03/25/ 1 4 - 04/02/1 4 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 04/02/14 - 04/08/ 1 4 13 +/- 4 11 +/- 4 8 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 10 +/- 3 13 +/- 4 04/08/ 1 4 - 04/14/ 1 4 17 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 14 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 04/ 1 4/ 1 4 - 04/2 1 / 1 4 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 4 13 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 04/2 1 / 1 4 - 04/28/14 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 04/28/1 4 - 05/05/ 1 4 7 +/- 3 4 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 7 +/- 3 05/05/ 1 4 - 05/12/ 1 4 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 05/ 1 2/ 1 4 - 05/20/ 1 4 15 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 05/20/ 1 4 - 05/27/ 1 4 14 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 18 +/- 4 05/27/ 1 4 - 06/02/ 1 4 10 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 5 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 06/02/ 1 4 - 06/09/ 1 4 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 12 +/- 3 06/09/ 1 4 - 06/ 1 6/ 1 4 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 06/ 1 6/ 1 4 - 06/23/ 1 4 16 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 '1 6 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 06/23/ 1 4 - 06/30/ 1 4 11 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 06/30/ 1 4 - 07/07/ 1 4 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 07/07/ 1 4 .. 07/1 4/1 4 14 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 07/14/14 - 07/21/14 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 15 +/- 3 07/2 1 / 1 4 - 07/28/ 1 4 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 07/28/ 1 4 - 08/04/ 1 4 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 8 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 08/04/ 1 4 - 08/1 1 /1 4 14 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 08/1 1 /1 4 - 08/1 8/1 4 10 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 08/ 1 8/1 4 - 08/23/ 1 4 13 +/- 4 < 4 14 +/- 4 9 +/- 4 10 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 08/23/1 4 - 09/02/ 1 4 10 +/- 2 13 +/- 2 9 +/- 2 9 +/- 2 7 +/- 2 12 +/- 2 09/02/1 4 - 09/08/ 1 4 16 +/- 4 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 4 13 +/- 4 10 +/- 3 14 +/- 4 09/08/1 4 - 09/ 1 5/ 1 4 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 09/1 5/1 4 - 09/23/1 4 17 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 09/23/14 - 09/29/ 1 4 14 +/- 4 18 +/- 4 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 4 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 09/29/1 4 - 1 0/06/ 1 4 17 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 1 0/06/1 4 - 1 0/ 1 4/ 1 4 15 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 20 +/- 4 17 +/- 3 1 0/1 4/1 4 - 1 0/20/ 1 4 11 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 1 0/20/1 4 - 1 0/27/ 1 4 14 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 1 0/27/1 4 - 1 1 /03/14 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 "1 3 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 1 1 /03/ 1 4 - 1 1 /1 0/ 1 4 18 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 1 1 /1 0/ 1 4 - 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 13 +/- 3 7 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 - 1 1 /24/ 1 4 16 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 20 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 1 1 /24/ 1 4 - 1 2/0 1 / 1 4 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 1 2/0 1 / 1 4 - 1 2/08/ 1 4 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 1 2/08/ 1 4 - 1 2/1 5/ 1 4 18 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 1 2/1 5/ 1 4 - 1 2/22/"14 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 1 2/22/ 1 4 - 1 2/29/ 1 4 14 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 AVAERAGE* 14 +/- 5 13 +/- 6 13 +/- 6 13 +/- 7 12 +/- 7 13 +/- 6

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

( 1 ) Low sample volume C-5

TABLE C*2 CONCENTRATIONS OF G ROSS BETA EM ITTERS IN AIR PARTICULATES Results In Units of 1 E-3 pCi!m 3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PE RIOD GROUP I START STOP SA-APT-'1 5S2 SA-APT-16E1 1 2/30/ 1 3 - 01/06/1 4 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 01/06/14 - 0 1 /1 3/1 4 19 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 01/1 3/14 - 0 1 /20/ 1 4 16 +/- 5 10 +/- 3 01/20/14 - 0 1 /27/ 1 4 20 +/- 3 28 +/- 4 01/27/ 1 4 - 02/03/1 4 17 +/- 3 20 +/- 3 02/03/ 1 4 - 02/1 0/1 4 18 +/- 3 24 +/- 4 02/1 0/14 - 02/1 8/ 1 4 15 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 02/1 8/14 - 02/24/14 15 +/- 4 11 +/- 3 02/24/14 - 03/04/14 19 +/- 3 20 +/- 3 03/04/14 - 03/1 0/14 17 +/- 4 17 +/- 4 03/ 1 0/14 - 03/ 1 8/1 4 14 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 03/ 1 8/ 1 4 - 03/25/ 1 4 14 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 03/25/ 1 4 - 04/02/1 4 14 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 04/02/1 4 - 04/08/ 1 4 12 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 04/08/14 - 04/ 1 4/1 4 18 +/- 4 16 +/- 4 04/ 1 4/14 - 04/2 1/1 4 12 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 04/2 1 / 1 4 - 04/28/ 1 4 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 04/28/14 - 05/05/ 1 4 7 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 05/05/14 - 05/ 1 2/14 15 +/- 3 15 +/- 3 05/1 2/1 4 - 05/20/1 4 15 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 05/20/1 4 - 05/27/ 1 4 12 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 05/27/14 - 06/02/14 8 +/- 3 11 +/- 4 06/02/14 - 06/09/1 4 10 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 06/09/14 - 06/ 1 6/ 1 4 8 +/- 3 10 +/- 3 06/'1 6/1 4 - 06/23/1 4 13 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 06/23/14 - 06/30/14 9 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 06/30/14 - 07/07/ 1 4 10 +/- 3 9 +/- 3 07/07/ 1 4 - 07/1 4/1 4 13 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 07/ 1 4/14 - 07/2 1/1 4 13 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 07/2 1 / 1 4 - 07/28/ 1 4 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 07/28/ 1 4 - 08/04/ 1 4 9 +/- 3 7 +/- 2 08/04/14 - 08/1 1 / 1 4 15 +/- 3 14 +/- 3 08/1 1/14 - 08/1 8/14 11 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 08/ 1 8/ 1 4 - 08/23/ 1 4 15 +/- 4 9 +/- 3 08/23/14 - 09/02/1 4 9 +/- 2 10 +/- 2 09/02/1 4 - 09/08/ 1 4 13 +/- 4 12 +/- 4 09/08/ 1 4 - 09/ 1 5/ 1 4 7 +/- 3 11 +/- 3 09/1 5/14 - 09/23/1 4 17 +/- 3 16 +/- 3 09/23/1 4 - 09/29/ 1 4 15 +/- 4 15 +/- 4 09/29/ 1 4 - 1 0/06/14 17 +/- 3 13 +/- 3 1 0/06/14 - 1 0/1 4/ 1 4 17 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 1 0/ 1 4/ 1 4 - 1 0/20/ 1 4 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 0/20/14 - 1 0/27/14 16 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 0/27/14 - 1 1 /03/1 4 15 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 1 /03/ 1 4 - 1 1 /1 0/ 1 4 18 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 1 /1 0/14 - 1 1 / 1 7/1 4 10 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 1 /1 7/14 - 1 1 /24/ 1 4 19 +/- 3 19 +/- 3 1 1 /24/ 1 4 - 1 2/01 / 1 4 12 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 1 2/0 1 /1 4 - 1 2/08/ 1 4 18 +/- 3 18 +/- 3 1 2/08/ 1 4 - 1 2/1 5/ 1 4 16 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 1 2/15/ 1 4 - 1 2/22/14 16 +/- 3 17 +/- 3 1 2/22/14 - 1 2/29/1 4 11 +/- 3 12 +/- 3 AVAERAGE* 14 +/- 7 14 +/- 8

.,. THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED U S I NG THE POSITIVE VALUES C-6

TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-1 31* IN FILTERED AIR Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCi/m3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERI OD CONTROL GROUP I START STOP SA-AI0- 1 4G 1 SA-AI0-1 F1 SA-AI0-2F6 SA-AI0-501 SA-AI0-5S1 SA-AI0-7S1 1 2/30/ 1 3 - 01/06/ 1 4 < 37 < 28 < 28 < 30 < 27 < 35 0 1 /06/ 1 4 - 0 1 /1 3/ 1 4 < 53 < 38 < 40 < 44 < 39 < 48 0 1 /1 3/14 - 0 1 /20/ 1 4 < 45 < 30 < 28 < 32 < 27 < 40 0 1 /20/14 - 0 1 /27/ 1 4 < 50 < 19 < 65 < 21 < 18 < 50 0 1 /27/ 1 4 - 02/03/ 1 4 < 20 < 22 < 20 < 24 < 21 < 19 02/03/1 4 - 02/1 0/14 < 23 < 27 < 27 < 32 < 28 < 24 02/ 1 0/ 1 4 - 02/1 8/14 < 52 < 42 < 42 < 52 < 42 < 58 02/1 8/ 1 4 - 02/24/ 1 4 < 38 < 43 < 38 < 44 < 37 < 40 02/24/ 1 4 - 03/04/1 4 < 30 < 26 < 27 < 24 < 24 < 35 03/04/ 1 4 - 03/10/1 4 < 26 < 35 < 35 < 32 < 31 < 30 03/10/14 - 03/18/1 4 < 23 < 26 < 30 < 25 < 27 < 26 03/18/14 - 03/25/ 1 4 < 53 < 42 < 49 < 49 < 45 < 58 03/25/ 1 4 - 04/02/1 4 < 25 < 24 < 24 < 23 < 21 < 26 04/02/1 4 - 04/08/1 4 < 46 < 37 < 39 < 37 < 34 < 46 04/08/14 - 04/14/14 < 46 < 34 < 34 < 32 < 30 < 45 04/1 4/1 4 - 04/21/1 4 < 39 < 37 < 37 < 37 < 33 < 39 04/2 1/14 - 04/28/ 1 4 < 27 < 26 < 27 < 28 < 26 < 28 04/28/14 - 05/05/ 1 4 < 39 < 32 < 31 < 31 < 27 < 39 05/05/14 - 05/12/ 1 4 < 29 < 25 < 28 < 28 < 23 < 33 05/1 2/1 4 - 05/20/ 1 4 < 36 < 37 < 34 < 37 < 37 < 34 05/20/14 - 05/2"1/1 4 < 34 < 35 < 32 < 32 < 29 < 35 05/27/14 - 06/02/1 4 < 60 < 45 < 42 < 45 < 43 < 60 06/02/1 4 - 06/09/ 1 4 < 51 < 69 < 66 < 69 < 56 < 49 06/09/14 - 06/16/1 4 < 45 < 48 < 46 < 50 < 45 < 43 06/ 1 6/ 1 4 - 06/23/1 4 < 40 < 33 < 37 < 37 < 36 < 39 06/23/1 4 - 06/30/ 1 4 < 33 < 25 < 23 < 23 < 28 < 37 06/30/ 1 4 - 07/07/1 4 < 20 < 21 < 20 < 20 < 18 < 18 07/07/ 1 4 - 07/14/ 1 4 < 46 < 36 < 36 < 37 < 36 < 46 07/ 1 4/ 1 4 - 07/21/14 < 33 < 32 < 33 < 31 < 31 < 31 07/2 1 / 1 4 - 07/28/1 4 < 37 < 47 < 47 < 42 < 41 < 37 07/28/ 1 4 - 08/04/ 1 4 < 39 < 33 < 29 < 32 < 31 < 37 08/04/ 1 4 - 08/1 1 / 1 4 < 31 < 29 < 29 < 32 < 28 < 31 08/1 1 / 1 4 - 08/1 8/ 1 4 < 50 < 41 < 42 < 45 < 43 < 45 08/1 8/ 1 4 - 08/23/ 1 4 < 67 < 64 < 65 < 67 < 64 < 64 08/23/14 - 09/02/ 1 4 < 41 < 34 < 34 < 36 < 34 < 38 09/02/14 - 09/08/ 1 4 < 61 < 55 < 57 < 59 < 58 < 61 09/08/14 - 09/15/ 1 4 < 41 < 43 < 43 < 42 < 42 < 39 09/ 1 5/14 - 09/23/ 1 4 < 36 < 28 < 28 < 29 < 28 < 35 09/23/1 4 - 09/29/ 1 4 < 44 < 37 < 40 < 40 < 39 < 47 09/29/14 - 1 0/06/ 1 4 < 28 < 23 < 26 < 26 < 25 < 27 1 0/06/14 - 1 0/14/14 < 32 < 31 < 33 < 34 < 44 < 34 1 0/1 4/ 1 4 - 1 0/20/ 1 4 < 13 < 12 < 13 < 12 < 13 < 13 1 0/20/ 1 4 - 1 0/27/ 1 4 < 37 < 37 < 38 < 38 < 39 < 40 1 0/27/ 1 4 - 1 1 /03/ 1 4 < 27 < 29 < 29 < 31 < 31 < 27 1 1 /03/ 1 4 - 1 1 /10/ 1 4 < 36 < 31 < 29 < 29 < 30 < 35 1 1 /1 0/1 4 - 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 < 38 < 42 < 42 < 40 < 43 < 38 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 - 1 1 /24/ 1 4 < 67 < 65 < 64 < 66 < 68 < 66 1 1 /24/14 - 1 2/0 1 / 1 4 < 60 < 50 < 47 < 45 < 50 < 62 1 2/0 1/14 - 1 2/08/ 1 4 < 22 < 39 < 39 < 37 < 37 < 21 1 2/08/14 - 1 2/1 5/1 4 < 25 < 21 < 20 < 21 < 20 < 27 1 2/ 1 5/14 - 1 2/22/1 4 < 14 < 33 < 31 < 32 < 30 < 14 1 2/22/14 - 1 2/29/ 1 4 < 47 < 30 < 28 < 28 < 27 < 47 AVERAGE

IODI NE-1 31 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF ?OE-3 pCi/m 3 C-7

TABLE C-3 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-1 31* IN FILTERED AIR Results in Units of 1 E-3 pCi/m 3 +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION PERIOD GROUP I START STOP SA-AI0-1 5S2 SA-AI0-16E1 1 2/30/ 1 3 - 01/06/14 < 36 < 33 0 1 /06/ 1 4 - 01/1 3/1 4 < 48 < 46 0 1 /1 3/14 - 01/20/1 4 < 62 < 36 0 1 /20/1 4 - 01/27/1 4 < 44 < 43 0 1 /27/1 4 - 02/03/1 4 < 17 < 17 02/03/1 4 - 02/1 0/14 < 22 < 24 02/1 0/14 - 02/1 8/14 < 58 < 49 02/ 1 8/ 1 4 - 02/24/14 < 40 < 37 02/24/ 1 4 - 03/04/1 4 < 32 < 32 03/04/ 1 4 - 03/1 0/1 4 < 28 < 27 03/10/14 - 03/1 8/1 4 < 24 < 22 03/18/14 - 03/25/ 1 4 < 54 < 50 03/25/1 4 - 04/02/14 < 24 < 27 04/02/1 4 - 04/08/1 4 < 42 < 2 04/08/ 1 4 - 04/1 4/14 < 41 < 40 04/14/ 1 4 - 04/2 1/1 4 < 37 < 37 04/21/14 - 04/28/1 4 < 26 < 26 04/28/1 4 - 05/05/ 1 4 < 37 < 38 05/05/14 - 05/1 2/1 4 < 31 < 31 05/1 2/14 - 05/20/1 4 < 34 < 34 05/20/14 - 05/27/1 4 < 36 < 34 05/27/1 4 - 06/02/1 4 < 63 < 62 06/02/14 - 06/09/14 < 51 < 53 06/09/14 - 06/1 6/1 4 < 45 < 47 06/1 6/14 - 06/23/1 4 < 40 < 39 06/23/14 - 06/30/ 1 4 < 38 < 36 06/30/14 - 07/07/14 < 18 < 19 07/07/14 - 07/1 4/1 4 < 46 < 45 07/14/14 - 07/2 1 / 1 4 < 31 < 34 07/21/14 - 07/28/14 < 38 < 36 07/28/14 - 08/04/1 4 < 37 < 35 08/04/14 - 08/1 1 / 1 4 < 32 < 30 08/1 1/14 - 08/1 8/ 1 4 < 47 < 48 08/18/14 - 08/23/14 < 69 < 60 08/23/14 - 09/02/1 4 < 42 < 37 09/02/14 - 09/08/ 1 4 < 61 < 57 09/08/14 - 09/1 5/14 < 42 < 40 09/1 5/14 - 09/23/1 4 < 33 < 35 09/23/14 - 09/29/ 1 4 < 48 < 43 09/29/14 - 1 0/06/ 1 4 < 28 < 27 1 0/06/14 - 1 0/1 4/1 4 < 34 < 31 1 0/1 4/14 - 1 0/20/ 1 4 < 13 < 12 1 0/20/14 - 1 0/27/ 1 4 < 40 < 36 1 0/27/14 - 1 1 /03/1 4 < 28 < 27 1 1 /03/14 - 1 1 /1 0/ 1 4 < 34 < 37 1 1 /1 0/14 - 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 < 36 < 39 1 1 /1 7/14 - 1 1 /24/1 4 < 61 < 70 1 1 /24/14 - 1 2/01/14 < 59 < 62 1 2/01/14 - 1 2/08/ 1 4 < 21 < 23 1 2/08/14 - 1 2/1 5/14 < 27 < 26 1 2/1 5/14 - 1 2/22/1 4 < 19 < 14 1 2/22/14 - 1 2/29/ 1 4 < 47 < 45 AVERAGE

IODINE-1 31 RES ULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 70E-3 pCi/m 3 C-8

TABLE C-4 DI RECT RADIATION MEASUREM ENTS - QUARTERLY DOSIMITRY RESULTS*

Results in units of mR/standard quarter ANNUAL JAN - MAR APR - JUN JUL - SEP OCT - DEC STATION 10 DOSE SA-IDM-1§1u 139.6 46.4 M.2 82.7 32.3 SA-IDM-2S2 53.0 1 3.7 1 1 .3 1 3.7 1 4.3 SA-IDM-2S4 64.8 1 8.7 1 5. 1 1 5.7 1 5.3 SA-I DM-3S1 44.5 1 3.3 1 0.2 1 0.7 1 0.3 SA-IDM-4S1 49.8 1 3.3 1 2.4 1 2.7 1 1 .4 SA-IDM-5S1 47.8 1 2.9 1 0.8 1 2. 1 1 2.0 SA-IDM-6S2 65.8 1 8.7 1 4.0 16.7 16.4 SA-IDM-7S1 5 1 .3 1 3.3 1 1 .9 1 3.6 1 2.5 SA-I OM-8S1 40.9 1 1 .7 9.1 9.1 1 1 .0 SA-IOM-9S1 43.0 1 1 .7 1 0.2 1 0. 1 1 1 .0 SA-IOM-10S1 46.2 1 1 .7 1 1 .9 1 1 .1 1 1 .5 SA-I DM-1 1 S 1 44.7 1 1 .3 1 1 .3 1 2. 1 1 0.0 SA-IDM-1 2S1 54. 1 1 4.6 1 1 .9 1 4. 1 1 3. 5 SA-I DM-1 3S1 60.3 1 6.2 1 4.0 1 3.6 1 6.5 SA-I OM-14S1 66.6 1 8.3 1 6.2 1 4.6 1 7. 5 SA-I DM-1 5S1 47.9 1 2. 5 1 1 .3 12.1 1 2.0 SA-l OM-1 5S2 50.1 1 4.2 1 0.8 12.1 1 3.0 SA-I DM-1 6S1 55.3 1 5. 8 1 2.9 1 3.6 1 3.0 SA-I OM-1 6S2** 1 55.0 42.4 36.0 39.6 37.0 SA-I DM-16S3 48.5 1 3.7 1 0.2 1 2. 1 1 2.5 SA-IOM-402 58.6 1 5. 8 1 5.7 1 5.6 1 1 .5 SA-IDM-501 53.6 1 4.6 1 2.4 1 3.6 1 3.0 SA-I OM-1 001 57.4 1 5. 8 1 2.4 1 4.9 1 4. 3 SA-I DM-1401 51 .2 1 4.2 1 0.8 1 1 .9 1 4. 3 SA-I DM-1 501 59.6 1 5. 4 1 3.5 1 5.4 1 5. 3 SA-I DM-2E1 5 1 .6 1 4.2 1 1 .3 1 3.0 13.1 SA-I OM-3E1 50.1 1 3. 7 1 0.8 1 2.5 13.1 SA-l OM-1 1 E 2 6 1 .5 1 8.3 1 3.5 1 4. 9 1 4.8 SA-I OM-1 2 E 1 60.4 1 7.0 1 5.7 1 5. 9 1 1 .8 SA-I OM-1 3E1 49.8 1 2.9 1 0.2 1 2.4 1 4.3 SA-I OM-1 6E1 61.8 1 5. 0 1 4.0 1 4. 0 1 8.8 SA-I OM-1 F 1 66.5 20.7 1 6.2 1 7. 1 1 2.5 SA- I O M-2F2 54.7* 1 4.2 1 2. 9 1 1 .5 1 6. 1 SA-IOM-2F5 54.9 1 5. 4 1 2.9 1 4.5 1 2. 1 SA-IOM-2F6 5 1 .2 1 4.2 1 2 .9 1 2. 1 1 2.0 SA-IOM-3F2 52.0 1 4.6 1 1 .3 1 3.5 1 2.6 SA-I OM-3F3 46.7 1 2.9 1 0.2 1 3.0 1 0.6 SA-IOM-4F2 5 1 .6 1 3.3 1 0.8 1 3.5 1 4.0 SA-I OM-5F1 47.2 1 3. 3 1 1 .9 1 1 .5 1 0.5 SA-IOM-6F1 45.7 1 2. 5 1 0.2 1 0.0 1 3.0 SA-IOM-7F2 53.1 1 3.3 1 0. 8 1 2.0 1 7.0 SA-IOM-8F1 61 .8 1 6.6 1 4.0 1 4. 9 1 6.3 SA- I OM-9F1 65.2 1 8.3 1 5.7 1 5. 9 1 5.3 SA-IOM-1 OF2 56.6 1 5.0 1 2.4 1 3.9 1 5.3 SA-IOM-1 1 F1 6 1 .8 1 6.6 1 4.0 1 5.9 1 5.3 SA-IOM-12F1 58.6 1 5.4 1 3.5 1 4.9 1 4.8 SA-l DM-1 3F2 53.7 1 6.2 1 1 .3 1 3.4 1 2.8 SA-l OM-1 3F3 58.8 1 6.2 1 2. 9 1 4.9 1 4. 8 SA- I OM-1 3F4 62. 3 1 6.6 1 4.0 1 6.4 1 5.3 SA-I DM-14F2 66.0 1 7. 8 1 4.0 1 6.4 1 7.8 SA-IOM-1 5F3 64.9 1 6.6 1 4.6 1 6. 9 1 6.8 SA-IOM-1 6F2 52.5 1 5.0 1 1 .3 1 3.4 1 2.8 SA-IOM-1 G3 (C) 54.6 1 5.0 1 1 .9 1 2.9 1 4.8 SA-IOM-3G1 (C) 59.0 1 5.4 1 4.0 1 5. 1 1 4.5 SA-I OM-1 OG1 (C; 59.8 1 6.2 1 2. 9 1 5.4 1 5. 3 SA-IOM-1 4G1 (C; 61.7 1 7. 0 1 5. 7 1 4.5 1 4. 5 SA-I DM-16G1 (C; 54.8 1 7.0 1 2.4 1 2. 9 1 2.5 SA-IOM-3H 1 (C) 45.6 1 2. 9 1 0.2 1 1 .0 1 1 .5

QUARTERLY ELEMENT TLO RESU LTS BY M I RI O N

- SAMPLE RESU LTS A R E AFFECTED B Y THE ISFSI (C) CONTROL STATION C-9

TABLE C-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-1 31* AND GAMMA EM ITTERS IN MILK Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION P E RIOD <----------GAMMA E MITTE RS---------->

STATION ID START STOP 1-1 31 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-MLK-1 3E3 01/05/1 4 " 0 1 l06/14 < 0.7 1 25 1 +/- 1 63 < 7 < 9 < 12 < 1 60 SA-MLK-1 4F4 01/05/ 1 4 " 0 1 /06/14 < 1 .0 1 579 +/- 1 94 < 6 < 9 < 13 < 1 93 SA-MLK-2G3 01/05/ 1 4 " 0 1 /06/ 1 4 < 0.8 1 230 +/- 1 62 < 7 < 7 < 10 < 1 68 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 0 1 /05/ 1 4 - 0 1 /06/ 1 4 < 0.9 1 346 +/- 1 95 < 6 < 9 < 13 < 201 SA-MLK-1 3E3 02/09/14 - 02/1 0/14 < 0.9 1 429 +/- 113 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 1 29 SA-MLK-*14F4 02/09/ 1 4 - 02/1 0/14 < 0.9 1 294 +/- 113 < 5 < 7 < 10 < 1 39 SA-MLK-2G3 02/09/ 1 4 " 02/1 0/ 1 4 < 0.8 1 1 94 +/- 1 23 < 5 < 5 < 8 < 1 23 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 02/09/ 1 4 - 02/1 0/ 1 4 < 0.9 1 341 +/- 1 42 < 5 < 5 < 10 < 1 12 SA-MLK-1 3E3 03/09/ 1 4 - 03/1 0/ 1 4 < 0.7 1 299 +/- 1 69 < 5 < 6 < 11 < 1 41 SA-MLK-1 4F4 03/09/ 1 4 - 03/1 0/14 < 0.7 1 358 +/- 1 50 < 6 < 6 < 12 < 1 39 SA-MLK-2G3 03/09/14 - 03/1 0/14 < 0.8 1 259 +/- 1 80 < 7 < 7 < 10 < 200 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 03/09/1 4 - 03/1 0/14 < 0.7 1 290 +/- 1 42 < 6 < 7 < 7 < 1 79 SA-MLK-1 3E3 04/06/1 4 - 04/07/1 4 < 0.4 1 382 +/- 99 < 4 < 4 < 5 < 83 SA-MLK-1 4F4 04/06/ 1 4 - 04/07/ 1 4 < 0.5 1 327 +/- 93 < 4 < 4 < 5 < 93 SA-MLK-2G3 04/06/14 - 04/07/14 < 0.5 1 323 +/- 84 < 3 < 4 < 5 < 88 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 04/06/1 4 - 04/07/14 < 0.4 1 272 +/- 1 08 < 3 < 4 < 6 < 78 SA-MLK-1 3E3 04/20/1 4 " 04/21/14 < 0.7 1 252 +/- 1 38 < 6 < 6 < 10 < 1 50 SA-MLK-1 4F4 04/20/1 4 " 04/2 1 / 1 4 < 0.7 1 293 +/- 1 68 < 6 < 7 < 11 < 1 35 SA-MLK-2G3 04/20/1 4 " 04/21/14 < 0.7 1 1 60 +/- 1 30 < 5 < 7 < 11 < 1 54 SA-MLK*3G1 (C) 04/20/1 4 " 04/21/14 < 0.6 1216 +/- 1 23 < 6 < 6 < 7 < 1 55 SA-MLK-1 3E3 05/04/1 4 " 05/05/ 1 4 < 0.7 1 233 +/- 1 33 < 5 < 5 < 8 < 1 24 SA-MLK-14F4 05/04/ 1 4 " 05/05/14 < 0.7 1 460 +/- 1 50 < 6 < 6 < 12 < 1 65 SA-MLK-2G3 05/04/ 1 4 " 05/05/14 < 0.7 1 267 +/- 1 15 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 1 04 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/04/14 " 05/05/14 < 0.7 1 378 +/- 1 28 < 7 < 8 < 12 < 207 SA-MLK-1 3E3 05/19/1 4 " 05/20/14 < 0.6 1 333 +/- 1 01 < 4 < 5 < 6 < 1 00 SA-MLK- 1 4F4 05/ 1 9/1 4 " 05/20/14 < 0.7 1 304 +/- 110 < 4 < 5 < 7 < 115 SA-MLK-2G3 05/19/1 4 " 05/20/1 4 < 0.6 1 305 +/- 76 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 82 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 05/1 9/1 4 " 05/20/ 1 4 < 0.7 1 281 +/- 1 05 < 4 < 4 < 6 < 1 13 SA-MLK-1 3E3 06/0 1 /1 4 - 06/02/ 1 4 < 0.4 1415 +/- 56 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 50 SA-MLK-1 4F4 06/01/14 - 06/02/14 < 0.4 1 41 6 +/- 57 < 2 < 3 < 5 < 64 SA-MLK-2G3 06/01/14 " 06/02/ 1 4 < 0.5 1 295 +/- 41 < 1 < 2 < 2 < 38 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/01/1 4 - 06/02/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 344 +/- 44 < 2 < 2 < 3 < 46 SA-MLK-1 3E3 06/15/1 4 " 06/1 6/14 < 0.4 1 256 +/- 1 30 < 4 < 6 < 6 < 1 34 SA-MLK- 1 4F4 06/ 1 5/ 1 4 " 06/1 6/14 < 0.4 1 280 +/- 113 < 6 < 7 < 7 < 1 42 SA-MLK-2G3 06/15/1 4 " 06/1 6/14 < 0.4 1 302 +/- 1 28 < 4 < 5 < 7 < 1 25 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 06/1 5/14 " 06/1 6/14 < 0.4 1 298 +/- 118 < 5 < 6 < 8 < 1 15 SA-MLK-1 3E3 07/06/ 1 4 - 07/07/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 505 +/- 1 25 < 4 < 5 < 7 < 1 21 SA-MLK-1 4F4 07/06/ 1 4 " 07/07/14 < 0.4 1 385 +/- 97 < 4 < 4 < 6 < 1 05 SA-MLK-2G3 07/06/1 4 " 07/07/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 1 85 +/- 83 < 3 < 3 < 4 < 96 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 07/06/ 1 4 - 07/07/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 309 +/- 96 < 5 < 6 < 7 < 1 37

IODINE- 1 3 1 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1 .0 pCi/L (C) CONTROL STATION C-1 0

TABLE C-5 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-1 31* AN D GAMMA EMITTERS IN MILK Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <----------GAMMA EMITTERS---------->

STATION I D START STOP 1-1 31 K-40 Cs- 1 34 Cs-137 BaLa-1 40 Ra-226 SA-MLK-1 3E3 07/20/14 - 07/2 1 / 1 4 < 0.4 1313 +/- 1 34 < 6 < 7 < 10 < 1 55 SA-MLK-14F4 07/20/14 - 07/2 1 / 1 4 < 0.4 1413 +/- 1 47 < 6 < 6 < 10 < 1 54 SA-MLK-2G3 07/20/14 - 07/2 1 / 1 4 < 0.4 1 350 +/- 1 43 < 6 < 6 < 8 < 1 60 SA-MLK-3G 1 (C) 07/20/14 - 07/2 1 / 1 4 < 0.4 1 1 39 +/- 1 25 < 4 < 5 < 6 < 1 21 SA-MLK-1 3E3 08/03/14 - 08/04/ 1 4 < 0.3 1 32 1 +/- 1 51 < 6 < 7 < 13 < 1 66 SA-MLK-1 4F4 08/03/14 - 08/04/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 308 +/- 1 43 < 7 < 7 < 12 < 1 50 SA-MLK-2G3 08/03/14 - 08/04/1 4 < 0.3 1 1 90 +/- 1 25 < 4 < 6 < 8 < 1 27 SA-Ml.K-3G 1 (C) 08/03/ 1 4 - 08/04/1 4 < 0.3 1 367 +/- 1 43 < 5 < 6 < 10 < 1 35 SA-MLK-1 3E3 08/1 7/1 4 - 08/1 8/14 < 0.7 1 585 +/- 1 79 < 7 < 7 < 10 < 1 87 SA-MLK-1 4F4 08/ 1 7/ 1 4 - 08/1 8/14 < 0.7 1 525 +/- 1 48 < 5 < 6 < 6 < 1 33 SA-MLK-2G3 08/1 7/ 1 4 - 08/1 8/14 < 0.7 1 370 +/- 118 < 4 < 4 < 5 < 1 23 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 08/1 7/1 4 - 08/1 8/14 < 0.7 1 364 +/- 1 36 < 5 < 5 < 6 < 1 21 SA-MLK-1 3E3 09/0 1 / 1 4 - 09/02/14 < 0.7 1512 +/- 1 41 < 5 < 6 < 11 < 1 55 SA-MLK-14F4 09/0 1 / 1 4 - 09/02/14 < 0.5 1 476 +/- 1 47 < 6 < 6 < 12 < 1 56 SA-MLK-2G3 09/0 1 / 1 4 - 09/02/14 < 0.6 1 336 +/- 1 84 < 7 < 8 < 14 < 208 SA-MLK-3G 1 (C) 09/0 1/1 4 - 09/02/14 < 0.5 1 371 +/- 1 27 < 5 < 6 < 8 < 1 39 SA-MLK**1 3E3 09/22/1 4 - 09/23/14 < 0.6 1 283 +/- 1 86 < 6 < 7 < 15 < 1 72 SA-MLK-1 4F4 09/22/1 4 - 09/23/1 4 < 0.6 1 269 +/- 1 48 < 5 < 5 < 12 < 1 64 SA-MLK-2G3 09/22/1 4 - 09/23/ 1 4 < 0.7 1 437 +/- 1 69 < 7 < 6 < 15 < 1 83 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 09/22/1 4 - 09/23/1 4 < 0.5 1217 +/- 1 60 < 4 < 4 < 14 < 1 41 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 0/05/14 - 1 0/06/ 1 4 < 0.3 1314 +/- 1 97 < 7 < 10 < 11 < 242 SA-MLK-14F4 1 0/05/14 - 1 0/06/ 1 4 < 0.3 1 449 +/- 1 62 < 6 < 7 < 10 < 1 62 SA-MLK-2G3 1 0/05/14 - 1 0/06/ 1 4 < 0.3 1 1 51 +/- 1 36 < 5 < 6 < 10 < 1 25 SA-MLK-3G 1 (C) 1 0/05/14 - 1 0/06/ 1 4 < 0.3 1 294 +/- 1 92 < 8 < 9 < 14 < 1 83 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 0/1 9/14 - 1 0/20/ 1 4 < 0.8 1 496 +/- 1 59 < 6 < 6 < 13 < 1 39 SA-ML.K-1 4F4 1 0/1 9/14 - 1 0/20/ 1 4 < 0.4 1317 +/- 1 46 < 6 < 7 < 14 < 1 66 SA-MLK-2G3 1 0/1 9/14 - 1 0/20/ 1 4 < 0.5 1 422 +/- 1 44 < 5 < 6 < 15 < 1 37 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 1 0/1 9/14 - 1 0/20/ 1 4 < 0.8 1 06 1 +/- 1 72 < 7 < 7 < 9 < 1 50 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 1 /09/ 1 4 - 1 1 /1 0/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 427 +/- 63 < 4 < 4 < 5 < 79 SA-ML.K-1 4F4 1 1 /09/14 - 1 1 /1 0/ 1 4 < 0.3 1517 +/- 62 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 64 SA-ML.K-2G3 1 1 /09/14 - 1 1 /1 0/ 1 4 < 0.3 1 440 +/- 72 < 3 < 3 < 4 < 73 SA-MLK-3G1 (C) 1 1 /09/14 - 1 1 /1 0/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 430 +/- 64 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 47 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 1 /1 6/14 - 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 < 0.8 1 308 +/- 111 < 5 < 5 < 12 < 1 03 SA-MLK-14F4 1 1 /1 6/14 - 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 < 0.5 1 402 +/- 1 47 < 5 < 6 < 13 < 1 37 SA-ML.K-2G3 1 1 /1 6/14 - 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 < 0.8 1 279 +/- 115 < 4 < 5 < 14 < 116 SA-MLK-3G 1 (C) 1 1 /1 6/14 - 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 < 0.8 1 302 +/- 1 56 < 9 < 8 < 13 < 248 SA-MLK-1 3E3 1 2/07/14 - 1 2/08/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 440 +/- 1 02 < 4 < 5 < 9 < 1 20 SA-MLK-14F4 1 2/07/ 1 4 - 1 2/08/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 387 +/- 1 23 < 4 < 5 < 11 < 116 SA-MLK-2G3 1 2/07/14 - 1 2/08/ 1 4 < 0.4 1 552 +/- 1 42 < 6 < 6 < 11 < 1 65 SA-MLK-3G 1 (C) 1 2/07/ 1 4 - 1 2/08/ 1 4 < 0.7 1 281 +/- 1 06 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 1 22 ANNUAL AVERAGE 1 338 +/- 1 29

IODI NE-1 31 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1 . 0 pCi/L (C) CONTROL STATION C-1 1

TABLE C-6 CONCENTRATIONS OF GROSS ALPHA AND G ROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN WELL WATER*

Results in units of pCi/liter +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD STATION I D START STOP G r-A Gr-B H-3 SA-WWA-3E 1 0 1 /27/ 1 4 - 01 /27/14 < 0.6 < 1 .9 < 1 77 02/24/14 - 02/24/ 1 4 < 1 .3 < 1 .6 < 1 68 03/1 8/1 4 - 03/1 8/ 1 4 < 1 .5 < 1 .7 < 1 73 04/1 4/1 4 - 04/14/14 < 1 .4 < 2.6 < 1 49 05/27/ 1 4 - 05/27/14 < 2.1 < 2.9 < 1 94 06/23/14 - 06/23/ 1 4 < 0.4 < 1 .4 < 1 96 07/28/ 1 4 - 07/28/14 < 1 .8 < 2.5 < 1 69 08/1 8/14 - 08/1 8/14 < 1 .4 < 2.3 < 1 63 09/23/ 1 4 - 09/23/14 < 3.0 < 2.5 < 1 80 1 0/20/ 1 4 - 1 0/20/ 1 4 < 1 .6 < 2.4 < 1 58 1 1 / 1 7/ 1 4 - 1 1 /1 7/ 1 4 < 1 .6 < 2.4 < 1 77 1 2/1 8/ 1 4 - 1 2/1 8/14 < 1 .7 < 2.6 < 1 95 AVERAGE**

MANAG EMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQU I RE D BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALU ES ARE CALCULATED USING TH E POSITIVE VALUES C-1 2

TABLE C-7 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS I N WELL WATE R*

Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <--GAMMA EMITTERS-->

STATION ID START STOP 1-1 3 1 ** K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 BaLa140 Ra-226 SA-WWA-3E1 01/27/14 - 0 1 /27/14 < 0.7 < 52 < 6 < 6 < 14 < 7 < 13 < 6 < 5 < 7 < 10 < 1 20 02/24/14 - 02/24/14 < 0.8 < 34 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 3 < 4 < 7 < 121 03/18/14 - 03/18/14 < 0.5 < 76 < 7 < 9 < 15 < 8 < 18 < 8 < 7 < 6 < 15 < 1 61 04/14/14 - 04/14/14 < 0.5 < 86 < 4 < 5 < 9 < 5 < 9 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 9 < 136 05/27/14 - 05/27/14 < 1 .0 < 35 < 4 < 5 < 10 < 4 < 9 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 6 < 1 22 06/23/14 - 06/23/14 < 0.4 < 73 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 7 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 113 07/28/14 - 07/28/1 4 < 0.5 < 99 < 5 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 12 < 6 < 5 < 5 < 10 < 1 32 08/1 8/14 - 08/18/14 < 0.4 < 28 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 75 09/23/ 1 4 - 09/23/14 < 0.6 < 35 < 3 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 5 < 95 1 0/20/14 - 1 0/20/1 4 < 0.6 < 59 < 8 < 6 < 13 < 8 < 14 < 7 < 6 < 7 < 11 < 1 41 1 1/1 7/14 - 1 1 /1 7/1 4 < 0.7 < 24 < 1 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 1 < 2 < 4 < 42 1 2/1 8/14 - 1 2/1 8/14 < 0.4 < 58 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 94 AVERAGE**

0I

.....>.

(....)

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-8 CONCENTRATIONS OF G ROSS ALPHA AN D GROSS BETA EMITTERS AND TRITIUM I N RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATER (2F3)

Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTIO N PERIOD STATI ON I D START STOP G R-A GR-B H-3 RAW 0 1 /01 / 1 4 - 01/3 1 / 1 4 < 2.1 5 . 0 +/- 1 .9 < 1 78 02/0 1 / 1 4 - 02/28/ 1 4 < 2.0 6 . 8 +/- 2.2 < 1 77 03/0 1 / 1 4 - 03/3 1 /1 4 < 1 .7 < 3.0 < 1 68 04/01/1 4 " 04/30/1 4 < 2.0 < 3.3 < 1 75 05/05/ 1 4

06/02/1 4 < 2.3 5.1 +/- 2.2 < 1 68 06/0 1 / 1 4 - 06/30/ 1 4 < 2.1 3.5 +/- 1 .9 < 1 89 07/0 1 / 1 4 - 07/3 1 /1 4 < 2.3 5.6 +/- 2 . 2 < 1 90 08/0 1 / 1 4 - 09/02/1 4 < 2.6 6.9 +/- 2.5 < 1 75 09/02/1 4 - 09/30/ 1 4 < 1 .8 6 . 1 +/- 2.5 < 1 83 09/30/ 1 4 - 1 1 /03/ 1 4 < 0.9 5.3 +/- 2.0 < 1 81 1 1 /03/ 1 4 - 1 2/0 1/1 4 < 3.0 3.9 +/- 1 .8 < 1 80 1 2/01 / 1 4 - 1 2/29/ 1 4 < 0.9 4 . 3 +/- 1 .9 < 1 77 AVERAGE* 5.2 +/- 2.3 TREATED 0 1 /0 1 / 1 4 - 01/3 1 /1 4 < 2.8 4 . 1 +/- 1 .5 < 1 76 02/0 1 / 1 4 - 02/28/ 1 4 < 1.1 5 . 8 +/- 1 .5 < 1 75 03/0 1 / 1 4 - 03/3 1/14 < 1 .5 4.5 +/- 1 .9 < 1 75 04/0 1 / 1 4 - 04/30/1 4 < 1 .5 3.0 +/- 1 .8 < 1 71 05/05/ 1 4 - 06/02/1 4 < 2.2 5.6 +/- 2.1 < 1 68 06/01/14 - 06/30/ 1 4 < 2.0 4.9 +/- 1 .9 < 1 93 07/0 1 / 1 4 - 07/3 1 /1 4 < 2.2 8.1 +/- 2.3 < 1 91 08/0 1 / 1 4 - 09/02/ 1 4 < 2.4 7.7 +/- 2 . 4 < 1 79 09/02/1 4 - 09/30/14 < 1 .8 7.9 +/- 2.6 < 1 83 09/30/ 1 4 - 1 1 /03/1 4 < 0.9 5.7 +/- 1 .9 < 1 85 1 1 /03/14 - 1 2/01/14 < 2.9 5 . 4 +/- 1 .9 < 1 83 1 2/0 1 / 1 4 - 1 2/29/1 4 < 0.9 3.5 +/- 1 . 8 < 1 74 AVERAG E* 5.5 +/- 3.4

THE AVERAG E AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALU ES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES C-1 4

TABLE C-9 CONCENTRATIONS OF IODINE-1 31* AND GAMMA EMITTERS IN RAW AND TREATED POTABLE WATE R {2F3)

Results in units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD <--GAMMA EMITTERS-->

STATION ID START STOP 1-1 3 1 K-40 M n-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-137 BaLa-140 Ra-226 SA-PWR:;2F3 0170lT14--Cf1731/14 < 0.7 < 68 < 4 < 4 < 10 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 4 < 5- < 9 < 116 SA-PWT-2F3 0 1 /01/14 0 1 /31/14 < 0.8 < 33 < 4 < 4 < 10 < 3 < 8 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 113 SA-PWR-2F3 02/01/14 02/28/1 4 < 0.7 < 55 < 6 < 7 < 13 < 6 < 13 < 6 < 6 < 6 < 12 < 1 03 SA-PWT-2F3 02/01/14 02/28/14 < 0.4 < 89 < 5 < 5 < 12 < 5 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 1 37 SA-PWR-2F3 03/01/14 03/31/14 < 0.8 < 41 < 5 < 5 < 8 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 11 1 SA-PWT-2F3 03/01/14 03/3 1 /1 4 < 0.7 < 99 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 4 < 9 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 8 < 1 27 SA-PWR-2F3 04/01/14 04/30/14 < 0.7 < 31 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 < 3 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 4 < 39 SA-PWT-2F3 04/01/14 04/30/14 < 0.7 < 11 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 31 SA-PWR-2F3 05/05/1 4 06/02/14 < 0.4 < 44 < 5 < 6 < 11 < 5 < 9 < 6 < 5 < 7 < 8 < 1 33 SA-PWT-2F3 05/05/1 4 06/02/1 4 < 0.3 < 56 < 6 < 7 < 15 < 8 < 11 < 7 < 6 < 7 < 10 < 1 76

()

I

-"'

01 SA-PWR-2F3 06/01/14 06/30/14 < 0.5 < 50 < 5 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 4 < 6 < 8 < 1 13 SA-PWT-2F3 06/01/14 06/30/1 4 < 0.5 < 94 < 4 < 5 < 9 < 5 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 6 < 8 < 1 14 SA-PWR-2F3 07/01/14 07/31/14 < 0.9 < 40 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 117 SA-PWT-2F3 07/01/14 07/31/14 < 0.4 < 44 < 5 < 5 < 9 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 6 < 6 < 7 < 151 SA-PWR-2F3 08/01/14 09/02/14 < 0.6 < 37 < 3 < 5 < 9 < 4 < 9 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 6 < 101 SA-PWT-2F3 08/01/14 09/02/14 < 0.7 < 40 < 5 < 4 < 11 < 4 < 10 < 4 < 5 < 5 < 7 < 101 SA-PWR-2F3 09/02/1 4 09/30/14 < 0.4 < 44 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 4 < 9 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 9 < 118 SA-PWT-2F3 09/02/1 4 09/30/14 < 0.4 < 51 < 5 < 6 < 10 < 6 < 10 < 6 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 119 SA-PWR-2F3 09/30/14 1 1/03/14 < 0.5 < 59 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 112 SA-PWT-2F3 09/30/1 4 1 1/03/14 < 0.5 < 40 < 4 < 4 < 10 < 5 < 10 < 4 < 4 < 5 < 8 < 1 21 SA-PWR-2F3 1 1/03/14 1 2/01 /1 4 < 0.4 < 45 < 5 < 4 < 11 < 4 < 12 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 9 < 1 50 SA-PWT-2F3 1 1/03/1 4 1 2/01/14 < 0.4 < 58 < 5 < 6 < 11 < 6 < 10 < 7 < 6 < 6 < 13 < 1 89 SA-PWR-2F3 12/01/14 1 2/29/1 4 < 0.6 < 85 < 3 < 4 < 7 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 5 < 1 08 SA-PWT-2F3 1 2/01 /14 1 2/29/14 < 0.6 < 29 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 80 AVERAGE

IODINE-131 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR D ECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION PERIOD & ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1 .0 pCi/L.

TABLE C-1 0 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETABLES Results in units of pCi!kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <--- -GAMMA EMITTERS--- >

STATION 10 P ERIOD TYP E Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th 232

-

SA-FPV-2F9* 05/1 1 / 1 4 Asparagus < 1 22 2531 +/- 3 1 1 < 23 < 15 < 13 < 375 < 61 SA-FPV- 1 G 1 * (C) 05/1 9/14 Asparagus < 69 2926 +/- 1 62 < 25 < 6 < 7 < 1 74 < 29 SA-FPV-2G2* (C) 05/1 9/14 Asparagus < 111 201 6 +/- 262 < 39 < 11 < 11 < 274 < 52 SA-FPV-3H5* (C) 05/19/14 Asparagus < 70 3267 +/- 1 59 < 27 < 7 < 8 < 1 66 < 29 AVERAGE** 2685 +/- 1 076 SA-FPL-1 0D1 06/30/1 4 Cabbage < 87 3635 +/- 21 1 < 21 < 10 < 12 < 232 < 43 SA-FPL-1 OD1 06/30114 Collards < 1 78 4977 +/- 325 < 40 < 22 < 22 < 400 < 82 SA-FPL-15S2 06/30/14 Cabbage < 58 4349 +/- 1 72 < 16 < 6 < 7 < 1 46 < 25 SA-FPL-1 6S1 06!30/1 4 Cabbage < 49 4607 +/- 1 59 < 13 < 5 < 6 < 1 04 < 24 SA-FPL-1 6S1 06/30/14 Collards < 62 6784 +/- 210 < 17 < 7 < 1 38 < 28 SA-FPL-1S1 06/30/1 4 Cabbage < 117 5342 +/- 303 < 26 < 13 < 15 < 212 < 57 SA-FPL- 1 S 1 06/30/ 1 4 Collards < 1 03 5857 +/- 253 < 24 < 11 < 13 < 260 < 43 SA-FPL-7S2 06/30114 Cabbage < 96 5968 +/- 264 < 23 < 10 < 11 < 236 < 44 0 SA-FPL-7S2 06/30/ 1 4 Collards < 53 641 0 +/- 1 68 < 15 < 5 < 6 < 1 51 < 25 I

->.

0)

AVERAGE** 5325 +/- 2055 SA-FPV-2F9* 07/24!1 4 Corn < 94 1 655 +/- 1 94 < 15 < 10 < 9 < 242 < 36 SA-FPV-2F9* 07/24/ 1 4 Tomatoes < 90 1 892 +/- 244 < 16 < 9 < 10 < 277 < 44 SA-FPV-2F9 07/2411 4 Peaches < 110 2295 +/- 280 < 22 < 11 < 14 < 304 < 48 SA-FPV-10D1* 07/30/ 1 4 Cabbage < 286 4322 +/- 512 < 52 < 25 < 30 < 649 < 1 16 SA-FPV-1 OD1

07/30/14 Collards 256 +/- 1 48 421 3 +/- 373 < 31 < 15 < 18 < 390 < 67 SA-FPV-15F4* 07/30/14 Corn < 1 53 2250 +/- 255 < 26 < 18 < 16 < 379 < 56 SA-FPV-15F4* 07/30/1 4 Peppers < 1 36 2283 +/- 234 < 28 < 16 < 15 < 367 < 50 SAFPV-15F4* 07/30/ 1 4 Tomatoes < 1 32 2320 +/- 328 < 25 < 14 < 17 < 322 < 74 SA-FPV-1 5S2* 07/30/14 Cabbage < 215 491 3 +/- 367 < 48 < 27 < 24 < 557 < 90 SA-FPV-16S1* 07/30/14 Cabbage < 1 80 4453 +/- 435 < 37 < 18 < 19 < 407 < 81 SA-FPV-1 6S1* 07/30/14 Collards < 1 22 4952 +/- 276 < 26 < 14 < 14 < 284 < 54 SA-FPV- 1 G 1 * (C) 07/30/14 Corn < 264 1 626 +/- 452 < 51 < 31 < 29 < 742 < 1 15 SA-FPV-1 G 1 * (C) 07/30/ 1 4 Collards < 232 2262 +/- 378 < 45 < 29 < 26 < 626 < 96 SA-FPV- 1 G 1 * (C) 07/30/1 4 Tomatoes < 161 2692 +/- 357 < 28 < 17 < 18 < 41 5 < 85 SA-FPV- 1 S 1 " 07/30/1 4 Cabbage < 259 4563 +/- 528 < 57 < 30 < 30 < 675 < 1 01 SA-FPV- 1 S 1

07/30/14 Collards < 277 3943 +/- 525 < 60 < 32 < 33 < 709 < 1 24

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUI RE D BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-1 0 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS I N VEGETABLES Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <--- -- GAMMA EMITTERS --- >

STATION I D PERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-1 3 1 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPV-2G2* (C) 07/30/14 Corn < 1 39 1 976 +/- 299 < 30 < 16 < 15 < 422 < 66 SA-FPV-2G2* (C) 07/30/14 Peppers < 241 301 8 +/- 374 < 51 < 29 < 27 < 657 < 1 01 SA-FPV-2G2* (C) 07/30/ 1 4 Tomatoes < 1 70 2576 +/- 335 < 34 < 19 < 19 < 486 < 73 SA-FPV-3H5* (C) 07/30/1 4 Corn < 141 1 940 +/- 309 < 24 < 11 < 16 < 322 < 41 SA-FPV-3H5* (C) 07/30/14 Peppers < 293 2299 +/- 453 < 47 < 25 < 29 < 688 < 116 SA-FPV-3H5* (C) 07/30/14 Tomatoes < 96 1 639 +/- 1 87 < 20 < 12 < 12 < 269 < 46 SA-FPL-7S2 07/30/1 4 Cabbage < 245 4729 +/- 5 1 1 < 48 < 21 < 26 < 466 < 1 18 SA-FPL-7S2 07/30/14 Collards < 1 85 6457 +/- 439 < 43 < 23 < 25 < 485 < 87 AVERAGE** 256 +/- 0 3 1 36 +/- 2732 SA-FPV-3F8 08/08/14 Peaches < 115 2449 +/- 264 < 32 < 10 < 12 < 308 < 43 SA-FPV-2F9 08/10/14 Peaches < 1 01 2594 +/- 262 < 24 < 11 < 12 < 277 < 48 SA-FPL- 1 0 D 1 08/21/14 Cabbage < 223 2555 +/- 425 < 35 < 23 < 29 < 554 < 1 02 SA-FPL-1 OD1 08/21/14 Collards < 326 3971 +/- 523 < 48 < 35 < 35 < 851 < 1 34 0I SA-FPL-1 5S2 08/21/14 Cabbage < 1 87 321 8 +/- 467 < 31 < 20 < 21 < 514 < 87

-->.

SA-FPL-1 5S2 08/21/14 Collards < 387 4 1 48 +/- 659 < 59 < 41 < 44 < 885 < 1 59

-....j SA-FPL-1 6S1 08/2 1 /1 4 Cabbage < 1 60 2495 +/- 41 1 < 27 < 18 < 23 < 404 < 79 SA-FPL-1 6S1 08/2 1 /1 4 Collards < 208 3808 +/- 508 < 35 < 21 < 25 < 523 < 1 04 SA-FPL- 1 S 1 08/2 1 /1 4 Cabbage < 228 2692 +/- 372 < 35 < 26 < 25 < 600 < 91 SA-FPL-1 S 1 08/21/14 Collards < 1 89 4033 +/- 509 < 31 < 20 < 23 < 570 < 85 SA-FPL-7S2 08/2 1 /1 4 Cabbage < 1 99 2863 +/- 444 < 35 < 23 < 25 < 523 < 1 06 SA-FPL-7S2 08/21/14 Collards < 1 82 3 1 27 +/- 478 < 27 < 16 < 17 < 456 < 76 AVERAGE** 3 1 63 +/- 1 3 1 6 SA-FPL-1 0D1 09/30/1 4 Collards < 1 83 3356 +/- 380 < 48 < 15 < 17 < 432 < 66 SA-FPL-1 5S2 09/30/14 Cabbage < 1 90 4024 +/- 386 < 47 < 17 < 19 < 433 < 73 SA-FPL-15S2 09/30/14 Collards < 87 5 1 46 +/- 376 < 23 < 8 < 10 < 1 32 < 34 SA-FPL- 1 6S1 09/30/1 4 Cabbage < 1 49 3085 +/- 353 < 55 < 14 < 17 < 394 < 61 SA-FPL-1 6S1 09/30/14 Collards < 1 55 4681 +/- 389 < 60 < 16 < 16 < 558 < 69 SA-FPL- 1 S 1 09/30/14 Cabbage < 151 2253 +/- 282 < 47 < 12 < 12 < 325 < 42 SA-FPL- 1 S 1 09/30/14 Collards < 1 87 3878 +/- 439 < 56 < 17 < 22 < 477 < 74 SA-FPL-7S2 09/30/14 Cabbage < 1 52 2938 +/- 412 < 37 < 14 < 16 < 328 < 66 SA-FPL-7S2 09/30/14 Collards < 203 4912 +/- 483 < 57 < 16 < 19 < 402 < 73 AVERAGE** 3808 +/- 1 965

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD D EVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-1 0 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN VEGETABLES Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE < GAMMA EMITTERS >

STATION ID PERIOD TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-1 31 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-FPL-1 OD1 1 0/27/14 Collards 209 +/- 74 3366 +/- 21 0 < 27 < 8 < 9 < 212 < 33 SA-FPL-1 5S2 1 0/27/14 Cabbage 210 +/- 1 01 2549 +/- 214 < 27 < 8 < 10 < 1 66 < 33 SA-FPL-16S1 1 0/27/14 Cabbage < 1 02 2340 +/- 235 < 31 < 8 < 10 < 239 < 43 SA-FPL-1 6S1 1 0/27/1 4 Collards < 70 3785 +/- 224 < 26 < 7 < 7 < 219 < 34 SA-FPL-1S1 1 0/27/14 Cabbage < 124 1 970 +/- 354 < 57 < 15 < 17 < 437 < 60 SA-FPL-1S1 1 0/27/14 Collards 270 +/- 1 68 4299 +/- 412 < 56 < 15 < 18 < 41 6 < 70 SA-FPL-7S2 1 0/27/14 Cabbage 324 +/- 1 61 4485 +/- 339 < 53 < 15 < 17 < 387 < 56 SA-FPL-7S2 1 0/27/1 4 Collards < 223 4260 +/- 373 < 60 < 19 < 20 < 475 < 82 AVERAGE** 253 +/- 1 1 0 3382 +/- 1 966 SA-FPL-10D1 1 1/1 9/14 Collards 363 +/- 86 4 1 95 +/- 222 < 41 < 9 < 9 < 261 < 37 SA-FPL-15S2 1 1/1 9/14 Cabbage < 1 36 2607 +/- 302 < 59 < 14 < 14 < 346 < 58 SA-FPL-1 6S1 1 1/1 9/14 Cabbage 1 79 +/- 1 02 2751 +/- 243 < 54 < 12 < 13 < 292 < 48 SA-FPL-16S1 1 1/19/14 Collards 201 +/- 94 4064 +/- 255 < 46 < 9 < 11 < 255 < 40

()

I SA-FPL-1S1 1 1/19/14 Cabbage 279 +/- 1 47 3572 +/- 321 < 58 < 14 < 16 < 344 < 57

SA-FPL-1 S1 1 1/19/14 Collards 1 95 +/- 98 4335 +/- 259 < 47 < 11 < 11 < 262 < 45 ex>

SA-FPL-782 1 1/1 9/1 4 Cabbage < 123 2900 +/- 283 < 54 < 14 < 14 < 249 < 55 SA-FPL-7S2 1 1/1 9/14 Collards 216 +/- 97 4620 +/- 297 < 38 < 10 < 11 < 208 < 46 AVERAGE** 239 +/- 1 40 3631 +/- 1 575

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD D EVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-1 1 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN FODDER C ROPS*

Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/-2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE <---GAMMA EMITTERS--->

STATION I D DATE TYPE Be-7 K-40 1-1 31 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-VGT-13E3 12/1 1/14 Silage 233 +/- 1 39 3036 +/- 308 < 31 < 11 < 15 < 355 < 60 SA-VGT-14F4 1 2/1 1/14 Silage < 1 84 3802 +/- 361 < 33 < 14 < 16 < 375 < 70 SA-VGT-2G3 12/1 1/14 Silage 265 +/- 144 4532 +/- 465 < 42 < 18 < 18 < 450 < 76 SA-VGT-3G1 (C) 1 2/1 1/14 Silage < 1 54 1610 +/- 297 < 37 < 16 < 18 < 304 < 64 AVERAGE** 249 +/- 22 3245 +/- 2499 0

'

.......

(0

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-1 2 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN SOIL Soil is sampled every three years. Last collection date was in 2013.

Next collection date is due in 201 6.

C-20

TABLE C-1 3 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS IN BEEF AND GAME*

Results in units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION SAMPLE TYPE <----GAMMA EMITTERS-- -->

STATION ID DATE Be-7 1-1 31 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 SA-GAM-13E3 02/21/14 Muskrat < 1 17 < 33 2834 +/- 287 < 12 < 15 03/02/14 Muskrat < 84 < 27 281 1 +/- 252 < 10 < 10 AVERAGE** 2823 +/- 33 SA-GAM-3E1 03/01/14 Muskrat < 111 < 31 3274 +/- 286 < 11 < 12 AVERAGE** -

3274 +/- 0 0I 1\.)

MANAGEMENT AUDIT SAMPLE: NOT REQUIRED BY ODCM

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-1 4 CONCENTRATIONS OF TRITIUM IN SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION PERIOD CONTROL START STOP SA-SWA-1 1A1 SA-SWA-12C1 SA-SWA-16F1 SA-SWA-1 F2 SA-SWA-7E1 01/1 3/14 - 01/1 3/14 < 1 85 < 1 80 < 1 81 < 1 86 < 1 80 02/23/14 - 02/23/1 4 < 1 66 < 1 80 < 1 63 < 1 65 < 1 68 03/05/14 " 03/05/1 4 1 760 +/- 231 < 1 88 < 1 91 < 1 65 < 1 65 04/ 1 0/1 4 " 04/1 0/14 < 1 70 < 1 69 < 1 71 < 1 72 < 170 05/07/1 4 " 05/07/14 < 1 67 < 1 69 < 1 67 < 1 69 < 1 82 06/02/1 4 " 06/02/1 4 < 1 84 < 1 84 < 1 83 < 1 81 < 1 79 07/09/14 " 07/09/1 4 < 1 82 < 1 81 < 1 82 < 1 84 < 1 84 08/05/14 - 08/05/14 < 1 81 < 1 84 < 1 81 < 1 80 < 1 83 09/12/1 4 - 09/12/14 < 1 81 < 1 77 < 1 78 < 1 77 < 1 79 1 0/09/14 " 1 0/09/14 < 1 67 < 1 83 < 1 83 < 1 84 < 1 82 1 1 /05/14

1 1/05/14 < 1 78 < 1 76 < 1 76 < 176 < 1 76 12/01/14 * "1 2/01/14 < 1 81 < 1 83 < 1 82 < 1 82 < 1 81 AVERAGE* 1 760 +/- 0.0

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USI NG THE POSITIVE VALUES C-22

TABLE C-1 5 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS I N SURFACE WATE R Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <-----GAMMA EMITTERS----->

SITE PERIOD 1-1 3 1

K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 BaLa140 SA-SWA-1 1A1 01/1 3/14 < 0.9 < 69 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 3 < 7 < 4 < 3 <3 < 10 02/23/14 < 0.8 < 1 32 < 6 < 6 < 13 < 6 < 11 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 9 03/05/14 < 0.7 < 27 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 4 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 04/1 0/14 < 0.8 < 42 < 5 < 6 < 12 < 6 < 10 < 5 < 5 < 6 < 11 05/07/14 < 0.8 < 15 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 5 06/02/14 < 0.7 < 34 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 5 07/09/1 4 < 0.9 97 +/- 42 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 08/05/14 < 1 .8 77 +/- 35 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 17 09/12/14 < 0.6 < 37 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 7 1 0/09/14 < 0.6 1 48 +/- 33 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 6 1 1/05/14 < 0.5 1 30 +/- 40 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 7 12/01/14 < 0.7 86 +/- 40 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 5 0I AVERAGE** 1 08 +/- 61

"'

(.)

SA-SWA-12C1 (C) 01/1 3/14 < < 76 < 3 <4 < 7 < 3 < 7 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 8 02/23/14 < 1 < 49 < 5 <6 < 13 < 5 < 13 < 7 < 5 < 6 < 9 03/05/1 4 < < 28 < 3 <3 < 7 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 04/10/14 < M < 48 < 4 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 12 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 13 05/07/14 < M 61 +/- 30 < 2 <2 < 5 < 2 < 4 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 6 06/02/14 < < 43 < 2 <2 < 5 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 5 07/09/14 < < 44 < 4 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 7 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 11 08/05/14 < 1J < 7 < 1 <2 < 4 < 1 < 2 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 19 09/12/14 < M < 54 < 5 <4 < 11 < 4 < 10 < 6 < 4 < 5 < 11 1 0/09/14 < M 1 1 3 +/- 23 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 5 1 1/05/14 < M 87 +/- 47 < 4 <4 < 8 <4 < 7 <4 < 3 < 3 < 8 1 2/01/14 < M < 34 < 3 <3 < 6 <3 < 5 <3 < 3 < 3 < 4 AVERAGE** 87 +/- 52

IODINE-1 3 1 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR DECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANAL¥ZED TO AN LLD OF 1 .0 pCi/L

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-1 5 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS I N SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <---- GAMMA EMITTERS --- >

SITE PERIOD 1-1 3 1

K-40 M n-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-1 34 Cs-1 3 7 BaLa140 SA-SWA-16F1 0 1 / 1 3/14 < 0.7 < 33 < 3 < 4 < 8 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 4 < 6 02/23/14 < 0.9 88 +/- 55 < 6 < 5 < 13 < 6 < 11 < 5 < 6 < 6 < 8 03/05/14 < 0.6 < 68 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 5 04/1 0/14 < 0.8 < 1 04 < 6 < 6 < 15 < 6 < 13 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 13 05/07/1 4 < 0.8 < 8 < 1 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 2.

06/02/14 < 0.7 < 48 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 5 07/09/14 < 0.7 < 40 < 5 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 9 < 6 < 4 < 5 < 11 08/05/14 < 1.7 < 8 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 13 09/1 2/14 < 0.6 < 52 < 6 < 5 < 10 < 6 < 12 < 7 < 6 < 7 < 12 1 0/09/14 < 0.7 79 +/- 32 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 8 1 1 /05/1 4 < 0.4 < 31 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 3 < 4 < 8 1 2/01/14 < 0.5 9 3 +/- 53 < 4 < 4 < 10 < 5 < 9 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 8 0

I N

AVERAGE** 87 +/- 1 4 SA-SWA-1 F2 0 1 /1 3/14 < 0.7 < 37 < 3 < 4 < 8 < 3 < 7 < 4 < 3 < 4 < 9 02/23/1 4 < 0.9 < 65 < 5 < 5 < 14 < 6 < 11 < 7 < 5 < 7 < 10 03/05/14 < 0.8 < 60 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 04/1 0/1 4 < 0.8 < 41 < 4 < 5 < 10 < 6 < 9 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 8 05/07/1 4 < 0.8 < 17 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 6 06/02/14 < 0.6 < 47 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 6 07/09/1 4 < 0.7 < 78 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 9 08/05/1 4 < 1 .3 < 9 < 1 < 2 < 4 < 1 < 2 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 22 09/12/14 < 0.5 < 50 < 6 < 6 < 12 < 5 < 9 < 6 < 5 < 6 < 8 1 0/09/14 < 0.6 < 16 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 1 < 2 < 6 1 1 /05/14 < 0.4 1 50 +/- 50 < 3 < 4 < 9 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 4 < 7 1 2/01/14 < 0.6 68 +/- 43 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 3 < 7 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 7 AVERAGE** 1 09 +/- 1 1 6

IODINE- 1 3 1 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR D ECAY TO STOP DATE OF COLLECTION AND ANALYZE D TO AN LLD O F 1 . 0 pCi/L

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD D EVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-1 5 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS I N SURFACE WATER Results in Units of pCi/L +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <--- -GAMMA E MITTERS- --->

SITE PERIOD 1-1 3 1

K--40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ZrNb-95 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 BaLa140 SA-SWA-7E1 0 1 /1 3/14 < 0.9 < 34 < 3 < 3 < 8 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 7 02/23/1 4 < 0.9 < 58 < 5 < 5 < 12 < 5 < 13 < 4 < 4 < 6 < 9 03/05/14 < 0.8 87 +/- 36 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 04/ 1 0/ 1 4 < 0.9 < 37 < 5 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 9 < 5 < 5 < 5 < 8 05/07/1 4 < 0.8 6 1 +/- 25 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 6 06/02/1 4 < 0.7 59 +/- 31 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 4 07/09/ 1 4 < 0.7 8 7 +/- 50 < 4 < 5 < 10 < 4 < 9 < 5 < 4 < 5 < 7 08/05/14 < 1 .6 70 +/- 34 < 1 < 1 < 3 < 1 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 1 < 21 09/12/14 < 0.5 < 53 < 6 < 7 < 14 < 5 < 12 < 5 < 6 < 6 < 10 1 0/09/ 1 4 < 0.8 99 +/- 30 < 1 < 2 < 3 < 1 < 3 < 2 < 1 < 1 < 5 1 1/05/14 < 0.6 71 +/- 47 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 1 2/01 / 1 4 < 0.7 1 35 +/- 56 < 4 < 4 < 9 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 7 0I N

U1 AVERAGE** 84 +/- 49

IODINE-1 31 RESULTS ARE CORRECTED FOR D ECAY TO STOP DATE O F COLLECTION AND ANALYZED TO AN LLD OF 1 .0 pCi/L

- THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD D EVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES

TABLE C-1 6 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS I N EDIBLE FISH Resu lts in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION <---GAMMA E MITTERS--->

STATION ID PERIOD K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs- 1 34 Cs-1 3 7 Ra-226 SA-ESF-1 1 A1 05/07/1 4 2862 +/- 757 < 60 < 57 < 1 04 < 56 < 118 < 54 < 67 < 1 090 09/23/1 4 4825 +/- 920 < 58 < 95 < 242 < 51 < 1 28 < 63 < 53 < 1 309 1 0/22/14 3082 +/- 1 071 < 56 < 71 < 1 75 < 56 < 121 < 48 < 55 < 1 035 1 0/28/14 5641 +/- 1 281 < 74 < 73 < 1 80 < 65 < 1 32 < 65 < 44 < 144 9 AVERAGE* 4 1 03 +/- 2700 SA-ESF-12C1 (C) 05/07/14 3941 +/- 829 < 42 < 46 < 84 < 51 < 87 < 53 < 42 < 785 09/23/14 4306 +/- 575 < 38 < 56 < 1 73 < 31 < 86 < 35 < 36 < 576 09/23/14 3077 +/- 951 < 67 < 89 < 253 < 55 < 115 < 59 < 55 < 1 1 37 1 0/27/ 1 4 3723 +/- 461 < 26 < 25 < 72 < 25 < 53 < 25 < 24 < 502 1 0/27/14 4238 +/- 989 < 60 < 74 < 1 77 < 60 < 128 < 55 < 52 < 1212 0I AVERAGE* 3857 +/- 990 N

0>

SA-ESF-7E1 05/07/1 4 31 06 +/- 665 < 29 < 35 < 77 < 35 < 78 < 30 < 35 < 606 1 0/27/14 6348 +/- 1 343 < 89 < 1 02 < 219 < 86 < 214 < 90 < 1 08 < 1 745 1 1/1 0/14 3579 +/- 1 059 < 64 < 63 < 1 69 < 69 < 141 < 63 < 79 < 1 500 1 1/1 0/14 3689 +/- 714 < 40 < 39 < 97 < 37 < 82 < 38 < 41 < 756 AVERAGE* 4181 +/- 2934

TH E AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD D EVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-1 7 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS I N CRABS Results in Units of pCi/kg (wet) +/- 2 sigma COLLECTION <---G AMMA EMITTERS--- ->

STATION I D PERIOD K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-1 34 Cs-137 Ra-226 SA-ECH-1 1 A1 07/23/14 2916 +/- 1 1 72 < 81 < 86 < 21 1 < 82 < 1 46 < 74 < 72 < 1 623 08/25/14 3952 +/- 881 < 73 < 85 < 1 37 < 72 < 1 79 < 93 < 77 < 1 677 AVERAGE* 3434 +/- 1 465 SA-ECH-12C1 (C) 07/23/1 4 3024 +/- 1 1 90 < 90 < 91 < 209 < 75 < 1 96 < 90 < 88 < 2099 08/25/ 1 4 3044 +/- 1 076 < 67 < 72 < 1 77 < 79 < 1 67 < 71 < 79 < 1 574 AVERAGE* 3034 +/- 28 0I N

-....!

TH E AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD D EVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USI N G THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-1 8 CONCENTRATIONS OF GAMMA EMITTERS I N SEDIMENT Results in Units of pCi/kg (dry) +/- 2 Sigma COLLECTION <---GAMMA EMITTERS --- >

STATION I D PERIOD Be7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-1 37 Ra-226 Th-232 SA-ESS-1 1 A1 06/27/ 1 4 < 354 3934 +/- 635 < 33 < 37 < 908 344 +/- 73 1 1/28/ 1 4 < 290 3996 +/- 607 < 28 29 +/- 1 8 < 599 236 +/- 91 AVERAGE* - 3965 +/- 88 -

29 +/- 0 290 +/- 1 53 SA-ESS-1 2C1 (C) 06/27/1 4 < 651 1 5780 +/- 1 460 < 74 < 69 < 1 786 936 +/- 1 79 1 1 /28/14 < 950 1 4480 +/- 1 657 < 1 03 < 97 < 2245 908 +/- 2 1 7 AVERAGE* 1 51 30 +/- 1 838 -

922 +/- 40 SA-ESS-1 5A 1 06/27/14 < 471 8644 +/- 902 < 45 < 49 < 1 35 1 800 +/- 1 98 1 1 /28/14 < 452 5549 +/- 916 < 47 < 50 < 1 094 555 +/- 1 38 AVERAGE* - 7097 +/- 4377 678 +/- 346 0

-

I N

CX> SA-ESS-1 6A1 06/27/1 4 < 505 5874 +/- 917 < 56 < 62 2030 +/- 1 01 6 947 +/- 1 74 1 1 /28/14 < 354 3714 +/- 596 < 35 < 36 301 6 +/- 987 753 +/- 1 04 AVERAGE* - 4794 +/- 3055 -

- 2523 +/- 1 394 850 +/- 274 SA-ESS-1 6F1 06/27/1 4 < 383 1 6070 +/- 1 429 < 48 < 64 1 903 +/- 1 087 615 +/- 1 89 1 1 /28/14 < 825 1 6880 +/- 1 633 < 84 < 80 < 1 864 996 +/- 235 AVERAGE* -

1 6475 +/- 1 1 46 1 903 +/- 0 806 +/- 539 SA-ESS-6S2 1 2/03/1 4 < 392 3004 +/- 530 < 36 < 38 < 869 242 +/- 95 AVERAGE* - 3004 +/- 0 242 +/- 0 SA-ESS-7E1 06/27/14 < 476 1 33 1 0 +/- 1 21 4 < 44 < 57 2058 +/- 1 1 55 695 +/- 1 69 1 1 /28/14 < 620 1 3560 +/- 1 624 < 59 < 64 2709 +/- 1394 948 +/- 218 648 AVERAGE* - 1 3435 +/- 354 2922 +/- 1468 1 031 +/- 571

THE AVERAGE AND 2 STANDARD DEVIATION VALUES ARE CALCULATED USING THE POSITIVE VALUES (C) CONTROL STATION

TABLE C-1 9 Concentrations of Tritium and Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL Sample Date Name Collected Nuclide Result 2 Sigma Units Ty!l§l SA-APT-5S2 1 4-Feb-1 4 Be-7 1 . 1 4E-01 +I- 2 . 1 6E-02 pCi/m3 SA-APT-5S2 1 6-May- 1 4 Be-7 9.91 E**02 +I- 2 .74E-02 pCi/m3 SA-APT-5S2 1 4-Aug-1 4 Be-7 9.02E-02 +/- 2.1 8E-02 pCilm3 SA-APT-5S2 1 3-Nov-14 Be-7 8.91 E-02 +I- 1 . 75E-02 pCi/m3 SA-MLK-1 4F4 9-Feb-14 K-40 1 .53E+03 +I- 2.07E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 9-Mar-1 4 K-40 1 .45E+03 +I- 1 .81 E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 6-Apr- 1 4 K-40 1 .44E+03 +/- 1 . 98E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 4-May- 1 4 K-40 1 .33E+03 +I- 1 . 85E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 1 -Jun- 1 4 K-40 1 .61 E+03 +/- 1 .98E+02 pCi/L SA-M LK-14F4 6-Jul-14 K-40 1 .45E+03 +/- 1 .62E+02 pCi/L SA-M LK-14F4 3-Aug-1 4 K-40 1 .43E+03 +/- 1 .39E+02 pCi/L.

SA-MLK-14F4 1 -Sep-14 K-40 1 .20E+03 +/- 1 .56E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 5-0ct-1 4 K-40 1 .49E+03 +/- 1 . 86E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 9-Nov-1 4 K-40 1 .48E+03 +/- 1 .56E+02 pCi/L SA-MLK-14F4 7-Dec-1 4 K-40 1 .26E+03 +/- 1 .94E+02 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1 A 1 5-Mar- 1 4 K-40 8.26E+01 +/- 3.39E+01 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1 A 1 2-J un- 1 4 K-40 4.38E+01 +/- 1 .58E+01 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1A1 1 2-Sep- 1 4 K-40 5.92E+01 +/- 3.08E+01 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1 A 1 1 -Dec- 1 4 K-40 9.70E+01 +/- 3.09E+01 pCi/L SA-SWA-1 1A1 5-Mar- 1 4 Tritium 1 . 78E+03 +/- 5.46E+02 pCi/L SA-FPL.-1 5S2 27-0ct-1 4 Be-7 1 . 75E+02 +/- 5.33E+01 pCi/kg Cabbage SA-FPL.-1 5S2 27-0ct-1 4 K-40 2.00E+03 +/- 2.33E+02 pCi/kg Cabbage SA-FPL.-1 6S 1 1 9-Nov- 1 4 Be-7 3.06E+02 +/- 1 .21 E+02 pCi/kg Collards SA-FPL-16S1 30-Sep-1 4 K-40 2.23E+03 +/- 2.78E+02 pCi/kg Cabbage SA-FPL-16S1 27-0ct- 1 4 K-40 1 . 88E+03 +/- 2.1 8E+02 pCi/kg Cabbage SA-FPL-16S1 1 9-Nov-1 4 K-40 3.61 E+03 +/- 4. 36E+02 pCi/kg Collards SA-FPL-1 S1 1 9-Nov-1 4 Be-7 3.07E+02 +/- 8.58E+01 pCi/kg Collards SA-FP L-1 S 1 1 9-Nov-1 4 K-40 4.25E+03 +/- 4.60E+02 pCi/kg Collards SA-FPL-7S2 27..0ct-1 4 Be-7 1 . 36E+02 +/- 6.65E+01 pCi/kg Collards SA-FPL-7S2 27-0ct- 1 4 K-40 4. 30E+03 +/- 4.27E+02 pCi/kg Collards C-29

TABLE C-1 9 Concentrations of Tritium and Gamma Emitters in Duplicate Samples from GEL Sample Date Name Collected Nuclide Result 2 Sigma U nits Type SA-FPV-1 5F4 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 2. 08E+03 +I- 2.68E+02 pCi/kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-1 G1 1 9-May- 1 4 K-40 2.1 7E+03 +I- 2.36E+02 pCi/kg Asparagus SA-FPV- 1 G 1 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 2.59E+03 +I- 3.29E +02 pCI/kg Corn SA-FPV- 1 G 1 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 1 .48E+03 +I- 2.56E+02 pCi/kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-2F9 1 1 -May-1 4 K-40 2.28E+03 +I- 2.7'7E+02 pCi/kg Asparagus SA-FPV-2G2 1 9-May- 1 4 K-40 1 . 72E+03 +I- 1 . 86E+02 pCi/kg Asparagus SA-FPV-2G2 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 2.20E+03 +I- 2.81 E+02 pCi/kg Corn SA-FPV-2G2 30-Jul- 1 4 K-40 1 .63E+03 +I- 2.27E+02 pCi/kg Peppers SA-FPV-2G2 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 1 .90E+03 +I- 2.36E+02 pCi/kg Tomatoes SA-FPV-3F8 8-Aug-1 4 K-40 1 .68E+03 +I- 2.09E+02 pCi/kg Peaches SA-FPV-3H5 1 9-May- 1 4 K-40 2.1 6E+03 +I- 2. 36E+02 pCi/kg Asparagus SA-FPV-3H5 30-Jul-1 4 K-40 1 .84E+03 +I- 2.62E+02 pCi/kg Corn SA-GAM-13F3 21 -Feb- 1 4 K-40 2.63E+03 +I- 2.56E+02 pCi/kg Muskrat SA-GAM-3F1 1 -Mar-1 4 K-40 2.72E+03 +I- 3.62E+02 pCi/kg M uskrat SA-ESF-1 1A1 1 8-May-1 4 K-40 4.1 1 E+03 +I- 4.91 E+02 pCi/kg SA-ESF-1 1A1 28-0ct- 1 4 K-40 3.86E+03 +I- 3.83E+02 pCi/kg SA-ECH-1 1A1 25-Jul-14 K-40 2.98E+03 +I- 2.92E+02 pCI!kg SA-ESS-1 1A 1 27-Jun- 1 4 K-40 3.67E+03 +I- 6.65E+02 pCi/kg SA-ESS-1 1A1 28-Nov- 1 4 K-40 2.79E+03 +I- 6.55E+02 pCi/kg SA-ESS-1 1 A1 27-Jun-1 4 Ra-226 3.1 9E+02 +I- 8.28E+01 pCi/kg SA-ESS-1 1A1 28-Nov- 1 4 Ra-226 1 .95E+02 +I- 9.22E+01 pCi/kg SA-ESS-6S2 3-Dec-1 4 Be-7 5.75E+02 +I- 2. 77E+02 pCi/kg SA-ESS-6S2 3-Dec-1 4 K-40 2 . 1 6E+03 +I - 5.29E+02 pCi/kg C-30

FIGURE 1 GROSS, BETA ACTMTY IN AIR PARllC:ULATES - QUARTERLY AVERAGE 1990 THROUGH 2014 100£H)

GROSS mETA iN JUR PARllCIJLATE lf! {::i!l f3l {41 {5)

{6}1973 THROUGH 2M4 tOOO tOO Hi 1

1916 1979 1982 1005 19\S$ 191!J1 10041 1 001 2(i(l(l 2003 21)00 2000 2!l12 1 0:0J}

M:"'

E 0I ::;:;.

UJ O

....>. c..

C?*

=

c.

a:.

(

1n.O +------1

'LO A A A A A *v * -:o

{)co o,; 1-, "" '\-<Q,<t "'""' ...Ji<.._

i-Weapons:Test1974 2-Weapons:Test1916 :3-1Jifeapons:Tesl:19ll 4-Weapons:Test1978 5-Weapons:Testi001 6-Chernoby'l1900 7-20t3oota irn::'rudestempmarys:ampingt'Oeafions-s:eeProgll:lmCrum s:eeticm.

-------- ----- - - - - - - - -

FIGURE 2 TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN S U RFACE WATER - QUARTERLY AVERAGE 1 990 THROUGH 201 4 1 0000.00 ,----,

TRITIUM ACTIVITY I N SURFACE WATER (o) 1 973 Through 2014 (1) [2) (3) ;4; (S) 10000 1 000 1 00 10 Effluent Discharge near time of sampling: 03-05-14 ----+

1 000.00 1-= Effluent Discharge near

=--=----t-l Effluent Discharge near time of sampling: 07-07-05 time of sampfing: 05-1 1 - 1 2

_J

,

(_)

0 1

0..

CN N

1 00.00 +------1 1 0.00 +rrrrn,""rrrnTTrrrn""""nnrn"""rn""rnrrrl

1 -Weapons Test 1 974 2-Weapons Test 1 976 3-Weapons Test 1 977 4-Weapons Test 1 978 5-Weapons Test 1 981 6-Chernobyl 1 986 Tritium detected in only one sample in 2012 (05/1 1/1 2}, 2013 (07/06/1 3} and 2014 (03/05/14)

FIGURE 3 CESIUM-1 37 & COBALT-60 ACTIVITY IN AQUATIC S E D I M E NT - S EMI-AN N UAL AVERAG E 1 990 T H RO U G H 201 4 1 0000 ------ C ES I U M-137 & C OBALT-60 ACTIVITY I N AQUATIC S E D I M E N T 1 977 TH ROUGH 201 4

there has not been any C o-60 detected above M D C since 2002 r -*

- CS-137 10 OJ ,,_ href="/ESI" title="ESI">ESI UM-1 37 ACTIVITY I N S OIL 1 974 T H ROUGH 201 3 (TRIENN IAL} 1 974 1 977 1 980 1 983 1 986 1 989 1 992 1 995 1 998 2001 2004 2007 201 0 201 3 U M M RY OF I NTERLABO RATORY COM PARISON P ROGRAM RESU LTS F ROM ECKERT & Z I EG L E R ANALYTI CS ( EZA), E NVI RO N M ENTAL RESOU RC E ASSOI CATES (ERA), AN D D E PARTM ENT OF E N E RGY (DOE) M IXED ANALYTE P E RFORMAN C E EVALUATION P RO G RAM (MAP E P) EZA ENVIRONM ENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGIN EERING (PAGE 1 OF 3) Reported Known Ratio (c) Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Val ue (b) TBE/A naltics Evaluation (d) Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 95.1 91 . 7 1 .04 A Sr-90 pCi/L 1 0 .9 1 5.1 0.72 w E1 0855 Milk 1-1 31 pCi/L 96.6 98.5 0 . 98 A Ce- 1 41 pCi/L 112 119 0 . 94 A Cr-51 pCi/L 449 491 0.91 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 1 86 21 0 0 . 89 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 250 253 0.99 A Co-58 pCi/L 248 268 0.93 A Mn-54 pCi/L 292 297 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 230 219 1 . 05 A Zn-65 pCi/L 31 2 323 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 32 1 337 0.95 A E1 0857 AP Ce-1 41 pCi 53.0 53.9 0.98 A Cr-51 pCi 232 223 1 .04 A Cs-1 34 pCi 1 00 95 . 3 1 . 05 A Cs-1 37 pCi 1 22 115 1 . 06 A Co-58 pCi 1 22 121 1 .01 A Mn-54 pCi 1 35 1 35 1 . 00 A Fe-59 pCi 111 99.3 1 .1 2 A Zn-65 pCi 1 40 1 47 0.95 A Co-60 pCi 1 87 1 53 1 .22 w E1 0856 C harcoal 1-1 31 pCi 74 . 1 76.4 0.97 A E1 0858 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 2090 1 760 1 .1 9 A J u ne 201 4 E1 091 3 Milk S r-89 pCi/L 85.9 91 . 3 0 . 94 A Sr-90 pCi/L 1 3 .8 1 4.5 0 . 95 A E1 091 4 Milk 1-1 3 1 pCi/L 86.5 90.9 0.95 A Ce-1 41 pCi/L 111 1 24 0.90 A Cr-51 pCi/L 255 253 1 .01 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 1 47 1 62 0.91 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 1 23 1 20 1 . 03 A Co-58 pCi/L 1 05 112 0.94 A M n .. 54 pCi/L 1 55 1 56 0.99 A Fe-59 pCi/L 1 06 1 02 1 .04 A Zn-65 pCi/L 251 252 1 . 00 A Co-60 pCi/L 218 224 0.97 A E1 091 6 AP Ce-1 41 pCi 95.1 92 . 6 1 . 03 A Cr-51 pCi 21 5 1 90 1 .1 3 A Cs-1 34 pCi 1 22 1 22 1 . 00 A Cs-1 37 pCi 95.1 89.8 1 . 06 A Co-58 pCi 88.7 84 . 1 1 . 05 A Mn-54 pCi 115 116 0.99 A Fe-59 pCi 72.6 76.7 0.95 A Zn-65 pCi 1 93 1 89 1 . 02 A Co-*60 pCi 1 79 1 68 1 . 07 A E1 091 5 Charcoal 1-1 3 1 pCi 85.6 85.2 1 . 00 A D-3 EZA ENVIRONM ENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK P ROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING (PAGE 2 OF 3) Reported Known Ratio (c) Matrix Nuclide U n its Vaiue ( a) Val u e (b) TBE/Analtics Evaluation (d) Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1 680 1810 0.93 A September 20 1 4 E 1 0946 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 90.7 96.9 0.94 A Sr-90 pCi/L 1 4 .0 1 6.4 0.85 A E1 0947 Milk 1-1 31 pCi/L 92.0 97.6 0 . 94 A Ce-1 41 pCi/L 117 1 26 0.93 A Cr-51 pCi/L 281 288 0.98 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 1 41 1 58 0.89 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 1 86 1 93 0 . 96 A Co-58 pCi!L 1 37 1 43 0.96 A Mn-54 pCi/L 1 38 1 42 0.97 A Fe-59 pCi/L 1 62 1 58 1 . 03 A Zn-65 pCi/L 75.2 73.0 1 .03 A Co-60 pCi/L 286 297 0.96 A E1 0949 AP Ce-1 41 pCi 97.8 82.1 1 .19 A Cr-51 pCi 212 1 88 1 .13 A Cs-1 34 pCi 1 06 1 03 1 . 03 A Cs- 1 37 pCi 1 31 1 26 1 . 04 A Co-58 pCI 85.7 93 . 0 0 . 92 A Mn-54 pCi 92.8 92 . 3 1 . 01 A Fe-59 pCi 113 1 03 1 .10 A Zn-65 pCi 53.2 47.5 1 .12 A Co-60 pCi 202 1 93 1 . 05 A E1 0948 Charcoal 1-1 31 pCi 83.9 89. 8 0.93 A E10950 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 20 1 0 1 720 1 .1 7 A E 1 0951 Soil Ce-1 41 pCi/g 0.208 0 . 1 86 1 .12 A Cr-51 pCi/g 0 . 398 0.425 0 .94 A Cs-1 34 pCi/g 0.21 6 0.233 0 .93 A Cs-1 37 pCi/g 0 . 398 0 . 365 1 .09 A Co-58 pCi/g 0 . 1 97 0.21 1 0.93 A Mn-54 pCi/g 0. 242 0.209 1 .1 6 A Fe-59 pCi/g 0.238 0.233 1 .02 A Zn-65 p Ci/g 0.1 1 7 0 . 1 08 1 . 08 A Co-60 pCi/g 0.447 0.438 1 .02 A December 201 4 E1 1 078 Milk Sr-89 pCi/L 85.7 95.7 0.90 A Sr-90 pCi/L 1 2 .9 1 5 .6 0 .83 A E1 1 079 Milk 1-1 31 pCi/L 85.9 95.1 0 .90 A Ce-1 41 pCi/L 205 219 0 .94 A Cr-51 pCi/L 402 406 0.99 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 1 56 1 64 0 .95 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 1 94 1 98 0.98 A Co-58 pCi/L 1 22 1 30 0 .94 A Mn-54 p Ci/L 220 225 0.98 A Fe-59 pCi/L 1 83 1 75 1 . 05 A Zn-65 pCi!L 287 297 0.97 A Co-60 pCi/L 224 235 0.95 A D-4 EZA ENVIRON M E NTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK P ROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING (PAGE 3 OF 3) Reported Known Ratio (c ) N u m ber Matrix Nuclide Units Value (a) Value (b) TBE/Analtics Evaluation (d) E 1 1 081 AP Ce-1 41 pCi 96.4 1 02 0.95 A Cr-51 pCi 1 71 1 90 0.90 A Cs-1 34 pCi 73 . 1 76.9 0.95 A Cs-1 37 pCi 99.0 92 .6 1 . 07 A Co-58 pCi 57.5 60.8 0.95 A Mn-54 pCi 1 07 1 05 1 .02 A Fe-59 pCi 74.2 81 .6 0.91 A Zn-65 pCi 1 44 1 39 1 . 04 A Co-60 pCi 114 110 1 . 04 A E 1 1 080 Charcoal 1-1 31 pCi 93.5 98.2 0.95 A E 1 1 082 Water Fe-55 pCi/L 1 760 1 970 0.89 A (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result. known value is equal to 100% of the parameter present In the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation. Brown Engineering to Analytlcs results. based on TBE Internal QC //mils: A= Acceptable, reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1. 20. warning, reported result falls within 0. 70-0. 80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable, reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0. 70 and > 1. 30. ERA ENVIRONM ENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS C H EC K PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING (PAGE 1 OF 1) Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year N u mber Media Nuclide U n its Value (a) Value (b) Lim its Evaluation (c) Water Sr-89 pCi/L 38.25 36.7 27.5 - 43.6 A S r-90 pCi/L 24.65 26.5 1 9 .2 - 30.9 A 8a- 1 33 pCi/L 89. 1 87.9 74.0 - 96.7 A Cs*-1 34 pCi/L 45.55 44.3 35.5 - 48.7 A Cs-1 37 pCi/L 91 . 1 5 89.1 80.2 - 1 0 1 A Co-60 pCI/L 65. 1 0 64.2 57.8 - 73 . 1 A Zn-65 pCi/L 244 235 2 1 2 - 275 A Gr-A pCi/L 45.65 61 .0 31 .9 - 75.8 A Gr-8 pCi/L 27 .95 33.0 21 .4 - 40.7 A 1-1 3 1 pCi/L 23.75 25.7 21 .3 - 30.3 A U-N at pCi/L 9.61 1 0 .2 7 . 95 - 1 1 . 8 A H-3 pCi/L 8435 8770 761 0 - 9650 A M RAD-20 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 28.0 46.0 1 5 .4 - 7 1 .4 A Novem ber 201 4 RAD-99 Water Sr-89 pCi/L 30.4 31 .4 22.8 - 38 . 1 A Sr-90 pCi/L 1 8. 6 2 1 .8 1 5 .6 - 25.7 A 8a-1 33 pCi/L 46.8 49.1 40.3 - 54.5 A Cs-1 34 pCi/L 88.0 89.8 7 3 . 7 - 98.8 A Cs-1 37 pCI/L 99.0 98.8 88.9 - 1 1 1 A Co-60 pCi/L 92. 5 92.1 82 .9 - 1 04 A Zn-65 pCi/L 325 310 279 - 362 A Gr-A pCi/L 29.9 37.6 19.4 - 48.1 A Gr-8 pCi/L 27.5 27.4 1 7 . 3 - 35.3 A 1-1 3 1 pCi/L 1 5 .8 20.3 1 6 .8 - 24.4 N (1 ) 5.74 5 . 80 4 . 34 - 6 .96 A H-3 pCi/L 6255 6880 5940 - 7570 A MRAD-21 Filter Gr-A pCi/filter 27.3 36.9 1 2 .4 - 57.3 A (1) The /odine-131 was evaluated as failed with a ratio of0. 778. No cause could be found for the s/ighly low activity. TBE would evaluate this as acceptab/le with warning. A rerun was not possible due to 1-131 decay. All previous ERA lodine-131 evaluations since 2004 have been acceptable. NCR 14-08 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result. title="ERA">ERA known value Is equal to 100% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation. title="ERA">ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result falls within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=check for Error. Reported result falls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit. DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) EERING (PAGE 1 OF 2) Reported Known Acceptance M onth/Year Nu mber Media Nuclide* Units Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c) Water Am-241 Bq/L 0. 764 0 . 720 0.504 -* 0.936 A Cs-1 34 Bq/L 20.7 23.1 1 6 .2 - 30 0 A Cs-1 37 Bq/L 28.0 28.9 20.2 - 37.6 A Co-57 Bq/L 26.5 27.5 1 9 .3 - 35.8 A Co-60 Bq/L 1 5.6 1 6 .0 1 1 .2 - 20.8 A H-3** Bq/L NR 321 225 - 41 7 N ( 3) 1 3 .5 1 3 .9 9.7 - 1 8 . 1 A Ni-63 Bq/L NR 34.0 23.8 - 44.2 N (3) 0.91 1 0 . 828 0.580 - 1 .076 Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0 . 751 0 . 676 0.473 - 0.879 K-40 Bq/L NR (1 ) N (3) NR 8.51 5.96 - 1 1 .06 N ( 3) NR 0 . 225 0 . 1 58 - 0.293 N ( 3) NR 1 .45 1 .02 - 1 .89 N (3) -0 .201 (1) A 1 4-MaS30 Soil Cs-1 34 Bq/kg 2.02 (1 ) A Cs-1 37 Bq/kg 1 300 1 238 867 - 1 609 A Co-57 Bq/kg 1 069 966 676 - 1 256 A Co-60 Bq/kg 1 . 32 1 .22 (2) A Mn-54 Bq/kg 1 51 0 1 430 1 001 - 1 859 A K-40 B q/kg 669 622 435 - 809 A S r-90 Bq/kg 4. 1 4 (1) A Zn-65 Bq/kg 763 695 487 - 904 A 1 4-Rd F30 AP Cs-1 34** Bq/sam ple NR 1 . 91 1 .34 - 2 .48 N (3) NR 1 . 76 1 .23 - 2 . 29 N (3) co ..57** Bq/sam ple NR (1) N (3) NR 1 . 39 0.97 - 1 . 81 N (3) NR (1) N (3) 1 .18 0.83 .. 1 . 53 N ( 3) NR (1) N (3) 1 4-GrF30 AP G r-A Bq/sam ple 0.606 1 . 77 0 . 53 .. 3.01 A Gr-8 Bq/sam ple 0.7507 0.77 0.39 - 1 . 1 6 A 1 4-RdV30 Vegetation Cs-1 34 Bq/sample 5.96 6.04 4.23 - 7.85 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sam ple 5.06 4 . 74 3.32 - 6. 1 6 A Co-57 Bq/sam ple 1 1 .8 1 0. 1 7. 1 - 1 3 . 1 A Co-60 Bq/sam ple 7 . 34 6.93 4.85 .. 9.01 A Mn-54 Bq/sam ple 8.95 8.62 6.03 - 1 1 .21 A Sr-90 Bq/sam p l e 1 .23 1 . 46 1 . 02 .. 1 . 90 A Zn-65 Bq/sam p l e 8.91 7.86 5.50 - 1 0.22 A D-7 DOE'S MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION P ROGRAM (MAPEP) (PAGE 2 OF 2} Reported Known Acceptance Month/Year Number Media Nuclide* U n its Value (a) Value (b) Range Evaluation (c) Water Am-241 Bq/L 0 . 705 0 . 88 0.62 - 1 . 1 4 A Cs-1 34*** Bq/L NR (1 ) N (4) NR 1 8. 4 1 2 .9 - 23.9 N (4) NR 24.7 1 7 . 3 - 32 . 1 N ( 4) NR 1 2 .4 8 . 7 - 1 6. 1 N (4) NR 1 4.0 9 .8 - 1 8.2 N (4) title="Ni-63">Ni-63 Bq/L 24. 07 24.6 1 7 .2 - 32.0 A Pu-238 Bq/L 0 . 591 0.61 8 0.433 - 0 . 803 A Pu-239/240 Bq/L 0 . 0 1 53 0. 0048 (2) A K-40*** Bq/L NR 1 61 1 1 3 - 209 N (4) NR 1 0 .9 7.6 - 1 4.2 N (4) 1 4-MaS31 Soi l Cs-1 34*** Bq/kg NR 622 435 - 809 N (4) NR (1) N ( 4) NR 1 1 16 781 - 1 45 1 N (4) NR 779 545 - 1 0 1 3 N (4) NR 1 009 706 - 1 3 1 2 N (4) NR 824 577 - 1 071 N (4) title="Sr-90">Sr-90 Bq/kg 694 858 601 - 1 1 1 5 A Zn-65*** Bq/kg NR 541 379 - 703 N (4) 1 4 RdF31 AP Sr-90 Bq/sample 0.31 0 0 . 703 0.492 - 0 . 9 1 4 N (4) 1 4-GrF31 AP Gr-A Bq/sample 0 . 1 53 0.53 0 . 1 6 - 0.90 N (4) 0 . 977 1 . 06 0 . 53 - 1 .59 A September 20 1 4 1 4-RdV31 Vegetation Cs-1 34 Bq/sample 7.31 7 . 38 5 . 1 7 - 9 . 59 A Cs-1 37 Bq/sampie 8.93 8.14 5.70 - 1 0 .58 A Co-57 Bq/sample 1 0 .8 9.2 6.4 - 1 2 . 0 A Co-60 Bq/sample 6.31 6. 1 1 4.28 - 7. 94 A Mn-54 Bq/sam ple 7 . 76 7.1 0 4.97 - 9.23 A S r-90 Bq/sam ple 0 .738 0.85 0.60 - 1 . 1 1 A Zn-65 Bq/sam p l e 7.1 6 6.42 4.49 - 8 .35 A

The MAPEP cross check isotope list has been reduced due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients.

- Starting 2014, these nuclides will no longer be part of the TBE cross check program due to duplication of effort or analysis not being performed for clients. MAPEP evaluates non-reported analyses as failed If they were reported In the previous series.

- - All future gamma cross check samples for these Isotopes will be provided by Analytlcs.

(1) False positive test. (2) Sensitivity evaluation. (3) Water, Ni-63 overlooked when reporting, but the result of 32.7 +- 1.69 would have passed the acceptance criteria. NCR 14-04 Water, the non-detected K-40 was overlooked when reporting, but would have passed the false positive test. NCR 14-04 AP, Sr-90 rerun was within the low range of the acceptqance criteria. The original and rerun results were) statistically the same. No cause could be Identified for the slightly low Sr-90 activity. NCR 14-04 For non reported (NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed if they were reported in the previous series. NCR 14-04 (4) AP, Sr-90 gravimetric yield was very high at 1 1 7%. Could indicate larger than normal amounts of calcium in the AP. A second fuming HNO 3 separation would be required to remove the excess calcium. NCR 14-09 AP, Gr-Aipha was counted on the wrong side. When flipped over and recounted the results were acceptable. NCR 14-09 For non reported (NR) analyses, MAPEP evaluates as failed if they were reported in the previous series. NCR 14-09 (a) Teledyne Brown Engineering reported result. (b) The MAPEP known value is equal to *tOO% of the parameter present in the standard as determined by gravimetric and/or volumetric measurements made during standard preparation. (c) DOE/MAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable. D-8 TABLE D-4 EZA ENVI RONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 1 OF 2) Acceptance -- - PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Range/ Provider _ Year _ Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0846 Cartri<:!f!§__ pCi lodine-1 31 7.83E+01 7.52E+01 1 .04 A Strontium-EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 084? Milk pCi/L 89 9 . 1 4E+01 9 . 1 7E+01 1 A Strontium-EZA __ 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0847 Milk pCi/L 90 -- r-11.7E +01 1 .51 E+01 0.84 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk pCi/L lodine-1 31 9.84E+01 9.85E+01 1 A EZA 1 st/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cerlum-1 41 1 .21 E+O 1 . 1 9E+02 1 .02 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cr-51 5 . 1 9E+O? 4.91 E+02 - 1 .06 A EZA 1 st/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 34 1 . 79E+O? 2 . 1 0E+02 0.85 -- A EZA 1 st/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 37 2.55E+02 2.53E+02 1 .01 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/ 1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 2.58E+02 2.68E+02 0.96 A EZA - 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk pCi/L Mn-54 3.01 E+02 2 .9?E+02 1 .01 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk -- pCi/L l rof1-59 2.24E+02 2 . 1 9E+02 1 . 02 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 3.45E+02 3.23E+02 1 . 07 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0848 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 3 .39E+02 3. 37E+02 1 . 00 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water J2Ci/L lodine-1 31 9.24E+01 8.99E+01 1 . 03 A EZA 1 st/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water pCi/L Cerium-1 41 8 . 1 9E+01 7.71 E+01 1 . 06 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water pCi/L Cr-51 3.32E+O 3 . 1 9E+02 1 . 04 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 1 .2?E+02 1 . 36E+02 0.93 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water pCi/L Ceslum-1 37 1 .69E+O 1 .64E+02 1 .03 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1 . 75E+O? 1 . 74E+02 1 .01 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water pCi/L Mn-54 2 . 08E+O 1 . 93E+02 1 .08 A EZA 1 st/2014 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water pCi/L I ron-59 1 .68E+O 1 .42E+02 1 '18 A EZA 1 st/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water* pCi/L Zinc-65 2.25E+O 2 . 1 0E+02 1 .07 A EZA 1 st/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 E 1 0849 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.31 E+O 2 . 1 9E+02 1 .02 A EZA 2 nd/20 1 4 08/08/ 1 4 E 1 0897 Cartridge pCi lodine-1 31 8.73E+01 8.54E+01 1 .02 A Strontium-EZA 2nd/201 4 08/08/14 E 1 0898 Milk pCi/L 89 9.84E+01 9. 1 3E+01 1 .08 A Strontium-EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/ 1 4 E 1 0898 Milk oCi/L 90 1 .44E+01 1 .45E+01 0.99 A EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/14 E 1 0899 Milk pCi/L lodine-1 31 9.89E+01 9.09E+01 1 .09 A EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/14 E 1 0899 Milk pCi/L Cerium-1 41 1 .38E+O 1 .24E+02 1 .12 A Chromium-EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/14 E 1 0899 Milk pCi/L 51 2.68E+O 2.53E+02 1 .06 A EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/14 E 1 0899 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 34 1 .58E+O 1 .62E+02 0.9'1 A EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/1 4 E 1 0899 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 37 1 .27E+O 1 .20E+02 1 .06 A EZA 2f}Q/201 4 08/08/14 E 1 0899 ___M!!L__ pCi/L Cobalt-58 -- 1 .20E+O 1 . 1 2 E+02 1 .0'1 A Manganese-EZA 2nd/201 4 08/08/14 E 1 0899 Milk pCi/L 54 1 .67E+O 1 .56E+02 1 .0'7 A EZA 2nd/201 4 08/08/14 E 1 0899 Milk pCi/L Iron-59 1 .02E+O 1 .02E+02 1 .00 A EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/14 E 1 0899 Milk --- pCi/L Zinc-65 2.68E+O 2.52E+02 1 .06 A EZA 2f1d/2 0 1 4 08/08/14 E 1 0899 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-60 2.42E+O 2.24E+02 1 .08 A EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/14 E 1 0900 Water pCi/L lodine-1 31 1 . 1 3E+O 9.83E+01 1 . 15 - A D-9 TABLE D-4 EZA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 2 OF 2) - *- Acceptance Range/ PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Ratio Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value - Evaluation EZA 2nd/201 4 08/08/ 1 4 E1 0900 Water pC\/L Cerium-141 1 .52E+02 1 .43E+02 1 .06 A Chromium-EZA 2 nd/20 1 4 08/08/ 1 4 E 1 0900 Water pCi/L 51 3.62E+02 2.94E+02 1 .23 A EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/ 1 4 E1 0900 Water pCi/L Ces\um-134 1 .69E+02 1 .88E+02 0.90 A EZA 2nd/20 1 4 08/08/ 1 4 E 1 0900 Water pCI/L -_gium-1 37 1 .48E+02 1 .39E+02 1 .06 A 1 __ EZA 2nd/201 4 08/08/ 1 4 E1 0900 Water pCi/L - Cobalt-58 1 . 34E+ O 1 .30E+02 1 .03 A Manganese-EZA 2 nd/20 1 4 08/08/ 1 4 E 1 0900 Water pCi/L 54 1 . 88E+O? 1 .80E+02 1 .04 A -- 2nd/2014 08/08/ 1 4 E1 0900 Water pCi/L I ron-59 1 .29E+02 1 . 1 9E+02 1 .09 A EZA 2nd/2014 08/08/ 1 4 E1 0900 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 3.29E+O 2.93E+02 1 .12 A EZA 2 nd/20 1 4 08/08/ 1 4 E 1 0900 Water pCi/L Coba\t-60 2.74E+O 2. 60E+02 1 . 05 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E1 0993 CartridQe pC\ \odine-1 31 9.47E+01 8.99E+01 1 .05 A Strontium-EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E 1 0994 Milk pCi/L 89 9.73E+01 9.69E+01 1 .00 A Strontium-EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E 1 0994 Milk oCi/L 90 1 . 31 E+01 1 .64E+01 0.80 A EZA 3rd/20 1 4 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E 1 0995 Milk pCi/L \odine-131 1 .04E+02 9.76E+01 1 .07 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L Cerium-1 41 1 .28E+O 1 .26E+02 1 .01 A Chromium-EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L 51 3 . 1 2 E+02 2.88E+02 1 .08 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 - E 1 0995 Milk pC\/L Cesium-134 1 .51 E+02 1 .58E+02 0.96 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L Cesium-1 37 2.03E+O 1 .93E+02 1 .05 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E1 0995 Milk pCi/L Cobalt-58 1 .44E+ O 1 .43E+02 1 .01 A - Manganese-EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E 1 0995 Milk pCi/L 54 1 .49E+02 1 .42E+02 1 .05 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E 1 0995 Milk pCi/L I ron-59 1 . 82E+02 1 .58E+O_? 1 .15 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E 1 0995 Milk pCi/L Zinc-65 7.41 E+01 7.30E+01 1 .01 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E 1 0995 Milk pCi/L Coba\t-60 3.1 4E+02 2.94E+02 1 .06 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E 1 0996 Water pCi/L \odine-1 31 1 .02E+02 9.88E+01 1 03 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E 1 0996 Water pCi/L Cerium-1 41 1 .30E+02 1 .25E+02 1 04 A Chromium-EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E 1 0996 Water pCI/L 51 2.75E+02 2 .86E+02 0.96 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/ 1 4 E1 0996 Water pCi/L Cesium-134 1 .45E+02 1 .56E+02 0.93 A EZA 3rd/201 4 1 1 /22/14 E 1 0996 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1 .94E+02 1 .92E+02 1 .01 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L Cobalt-58 1 .43E+O 1 .42E+02 1 .0 1 A Manganese-EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E1 0996 Water pCi/L 54 1 . 46E+O 1 .41 E+02 -- 1 .04 A EZA 3rd/201 4 1 1 /22/14 E 1 0996 Water oCI/L. I ron-59 1 .66E+02 1 .57E+02 1 .06 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E 1 0996 Water pCi/L Zinc-65 7.55E+01 7.24E+01 - -- --- - 1 .04 A EZA 3rd/2014 1 1 /22/14 E 1 0996 Water pCi/L Coba\t-60 3.09E+02 2.95E+02 1 .05 A D-1 0 TABLE D-5 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 1 OF 5)

----

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Range/ Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/14 GrF30 Filter Bq/sarnpie G ross Alpha 1 . 980 -- 1 . 77 0.53-3.01 A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 GrF30 Fi lter Bq/sampie G ross Beta 0.823 0,77 0.39-1 . 1 6 A MAPEP Americium-MAPEP 2 nd/20 1 4 -* 06/05/1 4 MaS30 Soil Ba/kq 241 65 68 47.6-88.4 A MAPEP False Positive MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kq Ceslum-134 5.44 0 Test A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 MaS30 Soil Bg/kq Cesium-1 37 1 270 1 238 867-1609 A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 MaS30 Soil Bq/kq Cobalt-57 947 - 966 676-1 256 A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg Cobait-60 0.581 1 .220 Sens. Eval. __ A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg Iron-55 580 643 444-824 A MAPEP Manganese-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg 54 1 470 1 430 1 00 1 -1 859 A MAPEP False Positive MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/1 4 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg Nickel-63 6.95 0 Test A -- MAPEP-1 4- Plutonium-MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Bq/kg 238 89.7 96.0 67-125 A MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg 239/240 69.80 76.8 53.8-99.8 A MAPEP-1 4- Potassium-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Bq/kg 40 703 622 435-809 A MAPEP Strontium- False Positive MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kq 90 1 .4 8 0 Test A -- MAPEP Technetium- False Positive MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil Ba/kg 99 37. 1 0 Test A MAPEP Not ( 1 ) MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/14 MaS30 Soil *- -- Ba/kg U-234/233 30.5 81 .0 57-105 Acceptable MAPEP Uranium- Not (1 ) 1 ( 1 )MA 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/1 4 MaS30 Soil Balkg 238 35 83 58-108 Acceptable MAPEP MAPEP 2ndl20 1 4 06105114 MaS30 Soil Bali<g Zinc-65 766 695 487-904 A MAPEP MAPEP 2ndl20 1 4 0610511 4 MaW30 Water BqiL Am-241 0.759 - 0.720 0.504-0.936 A MAPEP MAPEP 2ndl20 1 4 06105114 MaW30 Water Ball Cesium-134 2 1 .4 23.1 1 6.2-30.0 A MAPEP MAPEP 2ndl20 1 4 06105/ 1 4 MaW30 Water Ball Ceslum-1 37 29.7Q_ -- 28.9 20.2-37.6 A MAPEP MAPEP 2ndl20 1 4 06105/1 4 MaW30 Water Ball Cobalt-57 28.0 27.5 1 9.3-35.8 A --- MAPEP MAPEP 2ndl20 1 4 06105/ 1 4 MaW30 Water Ball Cobalt-60 1 6. 6 1 6.0 1 1 .2-2_0.8 ___ __ __ A __ MAPEP MAPEP 2ndl201 4 0610511 4 MaW30 Water __ fu]LL Hvdroqen-3 308 __ 321 225-4 1 7 A ---- MAPEP False Positive MAPEP 2nd/201 4 0610511 4 MaW30 Water -- Bqll I ron-55 0.3 -- 0.0 Test A --- MAPEP Manganese-MAPEP 2ndl201 4 0610511 4 MaW30 Water Ball 54 1 4.4 1 3.9 9. 7-1 8 . 1 A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/2014 06105/ 1 4 MaW30 Water BqiL Nickel-63 3 1 .4 34.0 23.8-44.2 A MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 2ndl201 4 06105/ 1 4 MaW30 Wa! BaiL 238 0.764 0.828 0.580-1 .076 . - A D-1 1 TABLE D-5 DOE's M IXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP) GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 2 OF 5)

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Rang e/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit -

Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation MAPEP- 1 4-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 MaW30 Water Bq/L Pu-239/240 0.6590 0.6760 0.473-0.879 A MAPEP-1 4- Potassium- False Positive MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/14 MaW30 Water Bq/L 40 0.460 0 Test A MAPEP 1 4-

- Strontium-

_fy1APEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 MaW30 Water Bq/L 90 8.32 8.51 5.96-1 1 .06 A MAPEP- 1 4 - Technetium-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/14 MaW30 Water Bq/L 99 9.5 1 0.3 7.2-13.4 A MAPEP 1 4

- -

MAPEP 2 nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 MaW 30 Water Bq/L U-234/233 0.21 0 0.225 0 . 1 58-0.293 A MAPEP Uranium-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/1 4 MaW 30 Water Bq/L 238 1 .4 1 1 .45 1 .02-1 .89 A MAPEP-1 4- False Positive MAPEP 2 nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 MaW30 Water B_g/L ---

Zinc-65 -0 . 1 26 0.0 Test A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 MaW30 Water Bq/L Gross Alpha 0.96 0.85 0.255-1 .443 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 2 nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 MaW30 Water Bq/L Gross Beta 4.7 4.2 2 . 1 0-6.29 A MAPEP 1 4-

- False Positive MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 MaW30 Water Bq/L lodine-129 0.0227 0.00 Test A MAPEP- 1 4- Uranium-MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter ug/sample 235 0.01 8 0.020 0.014-0.026 A MAPEP 1 4-

- Uranium-MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/14 RdF30 Filter ug/sample 238 8.77 1 0.4 7.3-1 3.5 A MAPEP Uranium-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/14 RdF30 Filter ug/sampie Total 8.80 1 0.4 7.3-1 3.5 A MA PEP-:_1 4- Americium-MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter ua/sample 241 0.086 0.090 0.063-0. 1 1 7 A MAPEP 1 4

- -

MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-1 34 1 .85 1 ,91 1 .34-2.48 A MAP E P-1 4 -

MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sample Ceslum-1 37 1 .8 1 1 .76 1 .23-2.29 A MAP E P 1 4-

- False Positive MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sa m ple Cobalt-57 0.0757 0.00 Test A M APEP 1 4-

-

MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter sam ole Cobalt-60 1 .490 1 . 39 0.97-1 .81 A MA P EP-1 4 - Manganese- False Positive

-

MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sample 54 0.01 38 0.00 Test A MAPEP-14 - Plutonium-MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sample 238 0.0008 1 9 0.00090 Sens. Eval. A MAPEP 0.054-MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sample Pu-239/240 0.071 0.7720 0 . 1 004 A MAPEP Strontium-MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sample 90 . -

1.19 1 .1 8 0.83-1 .53 A MAPEP 1 4-

- 0.01 37-MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sample U-234/233 0.01 59 0.01 95 0.0254 A MAPEP-1 4- Uranium-MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/1 4 RdF30 Filter B_g/sample 238 0.1 1 8 0 . 1 29 0.090-0 . 1 68 A MAPEP-1 4- False Positive MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/samole Zinc-65 0.246 0.00 Test A MAPEP 1 4-

-

MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sample G ross Alpha 1 .980 } .77 0.53-3.01 A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sa m pie Gross Beta 0 . 83 0.77 0.39-1 . 1 6 A MAPEP Americium-MAPEP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/1 4 RdF30 Filter Bq/sample 241 0 . 1 06 0 . 1 04 0.073-0 . 1 35 A MAPEP-1 4- Uranium- 0.01 88- Not (2)

MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/14 RdV30 Vegetation ug/sample 235 0.261 0.0268 -

0.0348 Acceptable MAPEP-1 4- Uranium-MA.EE.E._ _

2nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Veqetation uq/samole 238 1 2.7 1 3.- 9 . 3-1 7 . 3 A MAPEP 1 4-

- Uranium-MAf:'EP 2nd/20 1 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Vegetation ug/sample Total 1 2.7 1 3.3 9.3-1 7.3 A *--

MAPEP 1 4

- - Americium-f\PEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Veqetation uq/sample 241 0 . 1 1 00 0.1 0- __ 0.076-0 . 1 40 A D-1 2

TABLE D-5 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 3 OF 5)

-- -

,--------

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample Analyle I GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio Ev MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Venetation Bq/sample Cesium-134 5.65 6.04 - 4.23-7.85 A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesium-1 37 4.98 4.74 3 . 32-6 . 1 6 A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-57 1 1 .1 1 0. 1 7.1-1 3.1 A MAPEP MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample Cobalt-60 7.21 6.93 4.85-9.01 A MAPEP Manganese-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample 54 9.24 8.62 6.03-1 1 . 21 A MAPEP-1 4- Plutonium-MAPEP 2nd/2014 - Q6/05/1 4 RdV30 VeQetation Bq/sample 238 0.1 1 6 0 . 1 21 0.085-0 . 1 57 A MAPEP-1 4- 0 . 1 08-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/1 4 RdV30 Veqetation Bq/sample Pu-239/240 0 . 1 34 0 . 1 54 0.0200 A __

MAPEP Strontium-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Venetation Bq/sample 90 1 .580 1 .46 1 .02-1 .90 A MAPEP 0.01 77-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Venetation Bq/sample U-234/233 0.2640 0.2530 0.0329 A MAPEP Uranium-MAPEP 2nd/2014 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample 238 0 . 1 74 0 . 1 65 0. 1 1 6-0.215 A MAPEP- 1 4-MAPEP 2nd/201 4 06/05/ 1 4 RdV30 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 8.87 7.00 4.38-8.13 A MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 GrF31 Filter Bq/sample G ross Alpha 0.433 0.530 0 . 1 6-0.09 A MAPEP -- MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 01/09/ 1 5 GrF31 Filter Bq/sample G ross Beta 1 .060 '1 .060 0.53-1.59 A MAPEP Americium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 MaS31 Soil B/Kg 241 88.4 85.5 59.9-1 1 1 . 2 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg Cesium-1 34 588 622 435-809 A MAPEP False Positive

- MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Cesium-1 37 1 .67 Test A MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Cobalt-57 1 1 60 1 1 16 781 - 1 451 A MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Cobalt-60 821 779 545- 1 0 1 3 A MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn I ron-55 796 680 476-884 A __

MAPEP Manganese-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg 54 1 060 1 009 706- 1 3 1 2 A MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09L1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Nickel-63 924 980 686-1 274 A MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg 238 0.92 0.48 Sens. Eva!. A --

MAPEP-1 4- Plutonium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09£15 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg 239/240 61.5 58.6 4 1 .0-76.2 A__

MAPEP Potassium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 - 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaS31 Soil Bg/Kg 40 879 -- *-

824 577- 1 071 A MAPEP Strontium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kg 90 891 858 601-1 1 1 5 A MAPEP Technetium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn 99 466 589 41 2-766 __.6___

MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn U-234/233 905 89 62-1 1 6 A 1-- -

-

MAPEP Uranium-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09L1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn 238 257 259 1 81 -337 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 MaS31 Soil Bq/Kn Zinc-65 605.0 541 3?9-703 A MAPEP-1 4- Americium-

_MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L 241 0.91 5 0.880 0.62-1 . 1 4 A 1- --

MAPEP-1 4- False Positive MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water __ Bq/L Cesium-1 34 -0.06 Test __ _A__

MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L Cesium-1 37 1 8. 4 1 8.4 1 2.9-23.9 A D-1 3

TABLE D-5 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 4 OF 5)

..

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation MAPEP MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water B_q/L Cobalt-57 r-- 25 24.7 1 7.3-32 . 1 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L Cobalt-60 1 2. 5 1 2.4 8.7-1 6 . 1 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /201 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L Hydrogen-3 216 208 1 46-270 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L Iron-55 -

34.0 3 1 .5 22. 1 -4 1 . 0 A MAPEP Manganese-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L 54 ---

1 4. 2 1 4. 0 9.8-18.2 A MAPEP MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L Nickel-63 23.6 24.6 1 7.2-32.0 A MAPEP-1 4- Plutonium-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/1 5 . MaW31 Water Bq/L 238 0.547 0.6 1 8 0.433-0.803 A MAPEP-1 4- Plutonium-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L 239/240 0.01 5 0.005 Sens. Eval. A MAPEP- 1 4- Potassium-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/15 MaW31 Water Bq/L 40 1 74 161 1 1 3-209 A MAPEP- 1 4- Strontium- False Positive MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L 90 0.03 Test A MAPEP-1 4- Technetium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 01/09/ 1 5 MaW31 *-

Water Bq/L 99 6.92 6.99 4.89-9.09 A MAPEP Uranium-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L 234/233 0.206 0.205 0 . 1 44-0.267 A MAPEP- 1 4- Uranium-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L 238--*- ..

1 .280 1 .420 0.99-1 .85 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L Zinc-65 1 1 .900 1 090 7.6-14.2 A MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 01/09/ 1 5 MaW31 Water Bq/L G ross Alpha 0.793 0.701 0.201 -1 . 1 92 ___h_

MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 MaW31 _Water ___ Bq/L Gross Beta 6.220 5:94 2.97-8.91 A MAPEP Uranium- 0.0278-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/1 5 RdF31 -

Filter uq/sample 235 0.040 0.040 0.05 1 6 A MAPEP Uranium-MAPEP 4th /201 4 0 1 /09/1 5 RdF31 Filter ug/sample 238 1 9. 3 20.3 1 4.2-26.4 A MAPEP- 1 4- Uranium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 RdF31 Filter ug/sample Total 1 9.00 20.4 1 4.3-26.5 A MAPEP Americium- 0.0472-MAPEP 4th /201 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 RdF31 Filter ug/sample 241 0.0561 0.067 0.0876 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 01/09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Cesium-134 0.8640 0.96 0.67-1 .25 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /201 4 0 1 /09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Cesium- 1 37 1 . 1 90 1 .20 0.84-1 .56 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-57 1 .540 1 .43 1 .00-1.86 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Cobalt-60 1 .200 1 .1 0 0.7'1-1 .43 - -

A MAPEP Manganese-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 54 0.808 0.75 0.3-0.98 -

A MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/15 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 238 0.1 1 5 0 . 1 07 0 .075-0 . 1 39 A MAPEP Plutonium- 0.0328-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 239/240 0.048 0.0468 0.0608 A MAPEP-1 4- Strontium-MAPEP 4th /201 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 90 0.762 0.70 0.492-0.914 A MAPEP-1 4- Uranium- 0.0251 -

MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample 234/233 0.037 0.0358 0.0465 A MAPEP-1 4- Uranium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0'1/09/15 RdF31 _Filter B_gfsample 238 -

0.227 0.253 0 . 1 77-0.329 A MAPEP MAPEP 4th /201 4 01/09/1 5 RdF31 Filter Bq/sample Zinc-65 0.779 0.76 0.53-0.99 A MAPEP Americium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/1 5 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 241 0.226 0.19 0 . 1 35-0.251 A D-1 4

TABLE D-5 DOE's MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM (MAPEP)

GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 5 OF 5)

--- -

--,-

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample Analyte I GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4!11 /20 1 4 01 /09/1!? RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sm ple Cesium-134 4.750 5.20 3.64-6.67 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /2014 01/09115 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample Cesl um-1 37 6 . 91 0 6.60 4.62-8.58 A MAPEP-1 4- False Positive MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 01/09/15 RdV31 Vegetation Bqlsample Cobalt-57 -0.002 0.00 Test A MAPEP False Positive MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 01/09/ 1 5 RdV31 Vegetation Bqlsample Cobalt-60 0.008 0.00 Test A MAPEP Manganese-MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/ 1 5 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 54 7.980 7.88 5.52-10.24 A MAPEP Plutonium-

--MAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /091 1 5 RdV3'1 Vegetation Bq/sample 238 0 . 001 0.001 Sens. Eval. A r

MAPEP Plutonium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 239/240 0.1510 0 . 1 71 0 . 1 20-0.222 A MAPEP Strontium-

-[VlAPEP 4th /2014 0 1 /09/ 1 5 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 90 2 . 330 2.32 1 .62-3.02 A 1 -;--

MAPEP Uranium- 0.0326-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 234/233 0. 046 0. 047 __ 0.0606 A MAPEP.. 1 4- Uranium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/11? RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample 238 0.332 0.324 0.227-0.421 A MAPEP MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 RdV31 Vegetation Bq/sample Zinc-65 2 . 850 2 .63 1 . 84-3.42 A MAPEP Strontium-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 SrF-31 Filter Bq/sample 89 3.62 3.79 2.65-4.93 A MAPEP-1 4- Strontium-MAF'EP 4th /20 1 4 0 1 /09/ 1 5 SrF-31 Filter Bq/sarnple 90 3 . 79 r-- 3.62 2 .65-4.93 A MAPEP-1 4-MAPEP 4th /20 1 4 01/09/ 1 5 XaW-31 Water Bq/L lodine-129 4.56 4.55 3 . 1 9-5.92 A (1) The uranium-234/233 and uranium-238 i n soil reported values wer*e lower than the MAPEP known values. I t was determined that the digestion method using hydrofluoric acid (HF) was insufficient to completely digest the soil. MAPEP posted on their website that the analytes had been fused into the soil at an extremely high temperature. Reanalysis using a sodium hydroxide (NAOH) fusion method prior to ion exchange separation chemistry gave results for uraniurn-234/233 and uranium-238 that fell within the acceptance criteria (Corrective Action CARR1 40605-879).

(2) The uranium-235 in vegetation reported value was higher than the MAPEP known value. The failure was due to a hand entry error when entering the result into the MAPEP website. The activity was incorrectly entered as 0.261 ug/sample instead of the correct result of 0.0261 uglsample (Corrective Action CARR1 40605-879).

D-1 5

TABLE D-6 ERA ENVIRONM ENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 1 OF 2)

---

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/ 1 4 96 Water pCi/L Barium-1 33 80.6 76.2 63.8-83.8 A 1 st / RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/1 4 96 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 64.7 66.8 54.4-73.5 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/ 1 4 96 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 37 1 1 2.0 1 09 98. 1 - 1 22 A

"'"15fT""-

--

RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/14 96 Water --

pCI/L Cobalt-60 95.0 88.7 79.8-99.9 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/ 1 4 96 Water pCI/L Zlnc-65 200 1 85 1 66-2 1 8 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L G ross Alpha 34.8 36.1 1 8.6-46.4 A 1 st / RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L G ross Beta 1 9. 6 22.3 1 3.5-30.4 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 2014 02/24/ 1 4 96 Water pCi/L G ross Alpha 34.6 36.1 1 8.6-46.4 A 1 st / RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/ 1 4 96 Water pCi/L Radium-226 1 6. 2 1 6. 8 1 2.5-1 9.2 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/14 96 Water pCI/L Radium-228 4.62 5.04 3.01 -6.67 A 1 st / RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/ 1 4 96 Water pCi/L Uranium (Nat) 7.39 7.23 5.51 -8.53 A 1 st ! RAD - Uranium ERA 2014 02/24/14 96 Water ug/L (Nat) mass 1 1 .00 1 0. 6 8.07-12.5 A 1 st / RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Radlum-226 1 5. 1 0 1 6. 8 1 2.5-1 9.2 A 1 st / RAD -

ERA 2014 02/24/1 4 96 Water pCi/L Radlum-228 4.66 5.04 3.01-6.67 A 1 st / RAD -

ERA 20'14 02/24/14 96 Water pCI/L Uranium (Nat) 7.47 7.23 5.51 -8.53 A 1 st ! RAD - Uranium ERA 2014 02/24/14 96 Water ug/L ( Nat)mass 1 1 .4 1 0.6 8.07-1 2.5 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Tritium 3320 3580 3030-3950 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 2014 02/24/1 4 96 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 44.1 44.4 34.4-51 .6 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 2014 02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 34.2 30.3 22.1 -35.2 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 2014 02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L Strontium-89 38.9 44.4 34.4-51 .6 A 1 st I RAD -

E RA 201 4 02/24/14 96 Water pCi!L Strontium-90 27. 1 30.3 22.1 -35.2 ---

A 1 st !

ERA 201 4 02/06/14 01 1 01 4L Water pCi/L Strontlum-89 42.3 38.7 29.3-45.7 A 1 st /

ERA 2014 02/06/14 0 1 1 01 4L Water pCi/L Strontium-89 42.2 38.7 29.3-45.7 -* ---

A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 2014 02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L lodine-1 31 25.2 24.4 20.2-28.9 A 1 st ! RAD -

ERA 201 4 02/24/14 96 Water pCi/L lodine-1 31 22.4 24.4 20.2-28.9 _.../2_

3rd I RAD -

E RA 201 4 08/25/14 98 Water pCi/L Barium-1 33 67.8 68.7 57.3-75.6 A 3rd I

- -w*

RAD -

ERA 2014 08/25/14 98 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 71 72.3 59.0-79.5 A 3rd I

--

RAD -

ERA 201 4 08/25/14 98 Water pCi/L Cesium-137 1 61 1 63 1 47-1 81 A 3rd I RAD -

---

ERA 201 4 08/25/14 98 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 76.7 75.5 68.0-85.5 A D-1 6

TABLE D-6 ERA ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 2 OF 2)

Acceptance Range/

PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample GEL Known Date Number Unit Analvte I Nuclide Ratio Evaluation Provider Year Media Value value 3rd I ERA 201 4 08/25/ 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCi/L Gross Alpha 45.3 45.4 23.6-57.4 A 3rd I ERA 201 4 08/251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCI/L Gross Alpha 45.3 45.4 23.6-57.4 A t----

3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Gross Beta 32. 3 33.4 21 .7-41 . 1 A 3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Gross Alpha 48.6 45.4 23.6-57.4 A 3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Radium-226 8.26 9.06 6.80-1 0.6 A 3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Radium-226 8.54 9.06 6.80-1 0.6 A 3rd I ERA __ 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Radium-226 9.7 9.06 6.80-1 0.6 A 3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Radium-228 5.07 5.07 3.03-6.79 A 3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Radium-228 5.74 5.07 3.03-6.79 A t-- .

3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Uranium (Nat) 1 3. 9 1 3. 5 1 0.7-15.4 A 3rd I U ranium (Nat)

ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water ugiL mass 22.25 1 9. 8 1 5.6-22.6 A 3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Uranium (Nat) 13 1 3. 5 1 0.7-1 5.4 A 3rd I Uranium (Nat)

ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water ugiL mass 20.7 1 9. 8 1 5.6-22.6 A 3rd I

_ERA __ 20 1 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Tritium 1 0200 1 1 200 9750-1 2300 A 3rd I ERA - 2014 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCi!L Tritium 1 0400 1 1 200 9750-1 2300 A 3rd I Not ( 1 )

ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Strontlum-89 56.3 42.7 32.9-49.8 Acceptable 3rd I ERA 2014 08/251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Strontium-90 1 4. 3 31.7 23. 1 -36.7 A 3rd I Not (1 )

A 201 4 08/251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCIIL Strontium-89 56.5 42.7 32.9-49.8 Acceptable 3rd I ERA

201 4 0812511 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL Strontium-90 26 31.7 23.1 -36.7 A 3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCi!L lodine- 1 3 1 28.6 26.1 21 .7-30.8 A 3rd I ERA 201 4 081251 1 4 RAD-98 Water pCiiL lodine- 1 3 1 22.3 26.1 21 .7-30.8 A

----

(1) Two strontium-89 i n water reported values were higher than the ERA l<nown values. The associated Q C samples and instrument calibrations were reviewed but a cause for the failures could not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error caused the high bias for the batch associated with these samples (Corrective Action CARR1 40825-902).

--- -

D-1 7

TABLE 0*7 ERA M RAD ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY C ROSS CHECK P ROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 1 OF 7)

---

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Analvte I Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil [!CI/kg Actlnlum-228 1 1 40 1 240 795-1 720 A ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/ 1 4 MRAD 20 Soil pCI/kQ Americium-241 418 399 233-5 1 8 A ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-2 1 2 976 1 240 330-1 820 A I-_ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Bismuth-2 1 4 2290 1 960 1 1 80-2820 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCI/kg Cesium-1 34 3080 3390 2220-4070 A 651 0-ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Cesium-1 37 831 0 8490 1 0900 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 6570 6830 4620-9400 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Lead-2 1 2 1 330 1 240 81 2-1730 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Lead-2 1 4 2800 2070 1 21 0-3090 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kq Manqanese-54 <44.3 < 1 000 0-1 000 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 579 578 348-797 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 488 471 .00 308-651 A 7660-

__ ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kq Potassium-40 1 0500 1 0500 1 41 00 A ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kq Strontium-90 2500 2780 1 060-4390 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kQ Thorium-234 3420 3360 1 060-6320 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Zlnc-65 5700 5400 4300-71 80 A --

3250-ERA 2nd/20 1 4 06/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Strontium-90 6730 8530 1 3500 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/lill_ Uranium-234 2602 3390 2070-4350 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 MRAD 20 Soil pCifkq Uranium-238 2426 3360 2080-4260 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kQ Uranium-Total 5027 691 0 3750-9120 A 5570-ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/1 4 MRAD 20 Soil UQ/kg Uranium-Total( mass) 71 1 0 1 0 1 00 1 2700 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kQ Uranium-234 3440 3390 2070-4350 __A._

ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 3680 3360 2080-4260 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kq Urani um-Total 731 Q 691 0 3750-9120 A -*

5570-ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 MRAD 20 Soil UQ/kQ Urani um-Total (mass) 1 1 000 1 01 00 1 2700 A ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/14 MRAD 20 Soil oCi/kq Uranium-234 3740 3390 2070-4350 A ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/"1 4 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-238 3780 - 3360 2080-4260 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 MRAD 20 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 7683 691 0 3750-9 1 20 A 5570-ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/1 4 Soil ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 1 1 300 1 01 00 A MRAD 20 1 2700

'----

0-1 8

TABLE D-7 ERA MRAD ENVI RONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 2 OF 7)

-- ---*

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Analvte I Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/14 - Soil U Q/kQ Uranium-Total(mass) 1 1 200 1 01 00 5570-12700 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/14 VeQetation oCi/kQ Am-241 1 670 1 490 91 1 -1 980 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 VeQetation pCi/kQ Am-241 1 670 1 490 91 1 -1 980 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/20'1 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-1 34 657 646 41 5-839 A MRAD :..2o ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-1 37 861 880 638-1220 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 VeQetation oCi/kQ Cobalt-60 997 926 639-1290 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 Veaetation oCi/ka Curiu m-244 514 516 253-804 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/1 4 VeQetation pCi/kg Manganese-54 <62.2 <300 0.00-300 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/1 4 VeQetation pCi/kg Pl utonium-238 2230 2110 1 260-2890 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/ 1 6/ 1 4 Vegetation pCi/kQ Plutonium-239 381 0 3740 2300-51 50 A MRAD 23000-ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 - 20 VeQetation oCi/kQ Potassium-40 30800 31 900 44800 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 Vegetatiop pCi/kQ Strontium-90 2330 2580 1 470-3420 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-234 1 920 1 760 1 1 60-2260 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 Vegetation pCi/kg Uranium-238 1 970 1 750 1 1 70-2220 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 Vegetatio[l pCi/kQ Uranium-Total 4025 3580 2430-4460 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/ 1 4 Vegetation ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 5920 5240 ,__}51 0-6650 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 elation pCi/kg Zinc-65 1 030 919 663-1290 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/14 Vegetation pCi/kg U ranium-234 1 730 1 760 1 1 60-2260 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 Veaetation PCi/kQ Uranium-238 2000 1 750 1 1 70-2220 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 Vegetation pCi/kQ Urani um-Total 381 7 3580 2430-4460 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 Vegetation UQ/kg Uranium-Total(mass) 5990 5240 351 0-6650 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/14 Vegetation ug/kg Uranium-Total(mass} 5620 5240 351 0-6650 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/14 Filter pCi/Filter Americium-241 __!30.2 59.7 36.8-80.8 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/14 Filter pCi/Filter Cesium-1 34 920 1010 643-1250 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 Filter pCi/Filter Ceslum-1 37 816 828 622-1090 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/1 4 Filter j)Ci/Filter Cobalt-60 1 1 30 1 1 20 867-1400 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/1 4 Filter oCi/Filter I ron-55 254 240 74.4-469 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 Filter I oCi/Filter Manganese-54 <6.64 <50.0 0-50.0 A MRAD -20 ERA 2ndl2014_ 05/1 6/1 4 _filter I pCi/Filter Plutonium-238 51.3 56.3 38.6-74.0 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/ 1 6/ 1 4 Filter I pCi/Filter Plutonium-239 47.5 48.6 35.2-63.5 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 Filter I oCi/Filter Strontium-90 76.7 78.9 38.6-1 1 8 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 Filter I pCi/Filter Uranium-234 33.8 36.4 22.6-54 A ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 MRAD-20 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-238 34.5 36. 1 23.3-49.9 A D-1 9

TABLE D-7 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 3 OF 7)

-- **-

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/1 4 Filter oCi/Filter Uranium-Total 70.3 74.3 41 . 1 -1 1 3 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Totallmass) 1 04 1 08 69. 1 - 1 52 A MRAD -20

---

ERA 2nd/2014 05/ 1 6/14 Filter pCi/Filter Zinc-65 737 667 478-921 A MRAD -20

- ERA 2nd/2014 05/ 1 6/1 4 Filter pCI/FIIter Uranlum-234 35.5 36.4 22.6-54 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 - Filter oCi/Filter -

Uranium-238 35. 3 36.1 23.3-49.9 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/2014 05/1 6/1 4 Filter pCi/Filter Uranium-Total 72.4 74.3 41 . 1 -1 1 3 A **-

MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 1 05 1 08 69. 1 -1 52 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/14 Filter ug/Filter Uranlum-Total(mass) 1 00 1 08 69. 1 - 1 52 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 Filter _pCi/Filter Gross AIQ_h a 60.9 46 1 5.4-71 .4 A MRAD -20 ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/ 1 6/1 4 Filter oCi/Filter G ross Beta 58.9 53.8 34.0-78.4 A MRAD -20 Not (1 )

ERA 2nd/20 1 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 Water pCI/L Arnericium-241 1 86 114 76.8-153 Acceptable MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/20 1 4 05/1 6/14 Water pCI/L Cesium-134 1 540 1 660 1 220-1 9 1 0 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/) 6/14 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 37 2760 2690 2280-3220 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/2014 05/1 6/1 4 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 1 320 -- 1 270 1 1 00-1 490 A

-

MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 Water _t&j/L I ron-55 1 230 1 200 7 1 6-1 630 A MRAD -20

-RA _ 2"d/201 4 05/16/ 1 4 Water _pCI/_L --

Manganese-54 <7.54 <1 00 ---

0.00-100 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/ 1 6/ 1 4 Water _p_Qi/L __ Plutonium-238 37 44 32.6-54.9 A MRAD -20 E RA 2"d/201 4 05/ 1 6/ 1 4 Water pCI/L Plutonium-239 1 24 1 60 1 24-202 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/ 1 6/1 4 Water pCI/_1,. Strontium-90 95 890 580-1 1 80 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/ 1 6/1 4 Water pCi/L Uranlum-234 77.8 82.4 6 1 .9-1 06 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/ 1 6/ 1 4 Water _12_Ci/L Uranium-238 50.8 48.4 36.9-59.4 A MRAD -20

-

ERA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total _:156 __ 1 68 1 23-2 1 7 A --

MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 Water ug/L U ranium-Total(mass) 233 245 1 95-296 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 Water pCi/L _

Zinc-65 2030 1 800 1 500-2270 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 82. 1 82.4 6 1 .9-1 06 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/1 4 Water _Q_Ci/L Uranium-238 84.6 48.4 36.9-59.4 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/2014 05/1 6/1 4 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 1 "10 1 68 1 23-2 1 7 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/2014 05/1 6/1 4 Water u9L!:__ Uranium-Total(mass) 253__1-- 245 1 95-296 A __

MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/2014 05/1 6/14 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 80.5 82.4 6 1 . 9-1 06 A MRAD -20 ERA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/14 Water _!&l{h__ Uranium-238 90.0 48.4 36.9-59.4 A

-RA- 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/14 MRAD -20 Water pCI/L Uranium-Total 1 75 1 68 1 23-2 1 7 A D-20

TABLE D-7 E RA PROGRAM (M RAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 4 OF 7)

---*-n Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation MRAD-E RA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 20 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 269 245 1 95-296 A MRAD-E RA 2"d/2014 05/1 6/ 1 4 20 Water pCi/L Urani um-234 77.8 82.4 6 1 .9-106 A MRAD-ERA 2"d/2014 05/ 1 6/ 1 4 20 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 78.3 48.4 36.9-59.4 A MRAD-ERA 2"d/2014 05/ 1 6/14 20 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 1 56 1 68 1 23-2 1 7 A MRAD-ERA 2"d/2014 05/ 1 6/1 4 20 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 233 245 1 95-296 A MRAD-ERA 2"d/201 4 05/ 1 6/1 4 20 Water ug/L Uranium-Total( mass) 232 245 1 95-296 A MRAD-ERA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 20 Water pCi/L G ross Alpha 1 41 .0 1 33 47.2-206 A__

-

MRAD-ERA 2"d/201 4 05/ 1 6/ 1 4 20 -

Water pCI/L G ross Beta 1 72 1 74.0 99.6-258 A MRAD-ERA 2"d/201 4 05/1 6/ 1 4 20 Water pCi/L Tritium 5280 5580 3740-7960 A ru 3 / MRAD-ERA 2014 --

1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Actinium-228 1 280 1 240 795-1 720 A 3rar MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Americium-241 825 763 43 1 -956 A 3 '" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-2 1 2 1 620 1 240 330-1820 A 3 I

-

M RAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Bismuth-2 1 4 2900 281 0 1 690-4040 A

-- MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCI/kg Cesium- 1 34 1 960 2 1 40 1 400-2570 A ru 3 / MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Cesium-1 37 6760 6550 5020-8430 A 3 I M RAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Cobalt-60 4480 4260 2880-5860 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Lead-2 1 2 1 260 1 240 8 1 2-1 730 A ru -

3 / MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Lead-2 1 4 3480 2750 1 6 1 0-4 1 00 A 3ru / MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Manganese-54 <30.0 <1 000 0-1 000 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-238 732 739 444-1 020 A 3 '" I M RAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/14 21 Soil pCi/kg Plutonium-239 281 309 202-427 A 3r / MRAD- 7810-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCI/kg Potassium-40 1 1 500 1 0700 1 4400 A r

3 / MRAD- 3210-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Soil pCI/kg Strontium-90 8790 8420 1 3300 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Thorlum-234 2000 2350 743-4420 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Zinc-65 391 0 3270 2600-4350 A 3 I

-

MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-234 2280 2370 1 450-3040 A 3r r-

---

MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Uranlum-238 2340 2350 1 450-2980 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil pCi/kg Uranium-Total 4762 4540 2360-6390 A r

3 r- MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Soil ug/kg U ranium-Total(mass) 7020 7050 3890-8870 A r --

3 / MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Vegetation pCi/kg Am-241 2260 2290 1 400-3505 A r -

3 / MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/14 21 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-134 837 849 545-1 1 00 A 3'd I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /25/14 Vegetation pCi/kg Cesium-1 37 729 644 467-896 A 21 D-2 1

TABLE D-7 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 5 OF 7)

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Cobalt-60 818 784 541 -1 1 00 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /251 1 4 21 Vegetation pCi/kg Curlum-244 361 367 1 80-572 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /2511 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Manganese-54 <25 .3 <300 0-300 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Vegetation pCIIkg Plutonium-238 886 862 5 1 4-1 1 80 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 12511 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Plutonium-239 675 701 430-965 A MRAD- 22300-ERA 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Vegetation pCIIkg Potassium-40 35300 30900 43400 -

A 3 I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Strontium-90 1 230 1 71 0 975-2270 A 1----

3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Uranium-234 1 980 1 780 1 1 70-2290 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 125/ 1 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Uranium-238

1 970 1 760 1 1 70-2240 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Uranium-Total 4038 3620 2450-451 0 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /251 1 4 21 Vegetation uglkg Uranium-Total( mass) 591 0 5280 3540-671 0 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Uranium-234 1 670 1 780 1 1 70-2290 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Vegetation pCIIkg Uranlum-238 1 800 1 760 1 1 70-2240 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 125114 21 Vegetation pCi!kg Uranium-Total 3556 3620 2450-451 0 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 12511 4 21 Vegetation uglkg Uranium-Total(mass) 5390 5280 3540-671 0 A 3' I MRAD-

____E_ 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Vegetation uglkg Uranium-Total(mass) 5860 5280 3540-671 0 A

-

3' I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Vegetation pCilkg Zinc-65 1 930 1 570 1 1 30-2200 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCi!Filter Americium-241 4 1 .4 38.6 23.8-52.2 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCi!Filter Cesium-134 742 765.0 487-949 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 /251 1 4 21 Filter pCIIFilter Cesium-1 37 677 647 486-850 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCiiFilter Cobalt-60 543 523 405-653 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCiiFIIter I ron-55 1 17 1 20.0 37.2-234 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCiiFilter Manganese-54 <5.87 <50 0.00-50.0 A 3' I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter ugiFIIter Plutonium-238 32.9 35.7 -

24.5-46.9 A 3'" I M RAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCiiFilter Plutonium-239 26.8 29.1 2 1 ' 1 -38.0 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCiiFilter Strontium-90 1 87 1 68 82. 1 -252 A 3'" I

-

MRAD-ERA _. 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCI IFIIter Uranium-234 26 28 27.8-41 .9 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCiiFilter Uranium-238 28 27.60 __ 1 7.8-38.2 A 3 I

-

MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCiiFIIter Uranium-Total 56 57 31 .4-86.3 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter ugiFIIter Uranium -Total(mass) 82.6 82.7 52 . 9-1 1 6 A 3'" I

-

MRAD-ERA 2014 1 1 1251 1 4 21 Filter pCiiFilter Zinc-65 629 547 392-755 A D-22

TABLE D-7 ERA PROGRAM (M RAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 6 OF 7)

--

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample GEl. Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation 3' I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Filter l pCi/Filte Uranlum-234 28 28 27.8-41 .9 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Filter pCi/Filte Uranium-238 25 27.60 1 7.8-38.2 A 3' I MRAD-ERA 20 1 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Filter pCi/Filte Uranium-Total 55 57 31 .4-86.3 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 20 1 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 75. 1 82.7 52.9-1 1 6 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/14 21 Filter ug/Filter Uranium-Total(mass) 90.7 82.7 52.9-1 1 6 A 3'" I M RAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Filter pCi/Filte Gross Alpha 47.4 36.9 1 2.4-57.3 A __

3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Filter pCi/Filte G ross Beta 27.2 21.1 1 3. 3-30.8 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 201 4 -* 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Water pCi/L Americium-241 72.4 68.6 46.2-92.0 _..!:..__

3' I MRAD-ERA 20 1 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 34 8 1 6.0 850 624-977 A 3' I

-

MRAD-ERA 20 1 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Cesium-1 37 1310 1 240 1 060-1 490 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Cobalt-60 1 1 30 1 070 930-1 250 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Iron-55 1 30 1 34 79.9-1 82 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/14 21 Water pCi/L Manganese-54 <6.34 <1 00 0.00-100 A ru 3 / MRAD-ERA 201 4 " 11/25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Plutonium-238 35 33 24.6-41 .4 A 3' I MRAD-ERA 20 1 4 -- 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Plutonium-239 46.4 51 39. 7-64.4 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 20 1 4 -

1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Strontium-90 300 254 1 65-336 A 3' I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 42 44 32.9-56.5 A 3m I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Water pCI/L Uranlum-238 50 43.50 33.2-53.4 _A__

3'0 / MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 92 89 65.5-1 1 5 A 3' " I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 1 37 1 30 1 04-157 A

'u 3 / MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/14 21 Water pCI/L Zinc-65 1 070 921 768-1 1 60 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 43 44 32.9-56.5 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 45 43.50 33.2-53.4 A 3'" I

----

MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 90 89 65.5-1 1 5 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/14 21 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 1 34 1 30 1 04-157 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-234 49 44 32.9-56.5 A ru 3 / MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/14 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-238 42 43.50 33.2-53.4 A 3 I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/ 1 4 21 Water pCi/L Uranium-Total 93 89 65.5-1 1 5 -

3'" I MRAD-E RA 201 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Water __ ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 1 26 1 30 1 04-157 A 3'" I

--

MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Water ug/L Uranium-Total(mass) 1 44 1 30 1 04-157 A 3'" I MRAD-ERA 201 4 1 1 /25/1 4 21 Water pCi/L G ross Alpha 96.2 98 34.8-1 52 A ERA 3rd I 1 1 /25/ 1 4 MRAD- Water pCi/L G ross Beta 86.1 77.5 44.4-1 1 5 A D-23

TABLE D-7 ERA PROGRAM (MRAD) PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RESULTS GEL LABORATORIES (PAGE 7 OF 7)

Acceptance PT Quarter I Report Sample Sample GEL Known Range/

Provider Year Date Number Media Unit Analyte I Nuclide Value value Ratio Evaluation 3'" I MRAD ERA 2014 1 1 /25/ 1 4 -21 Water pCi/L Tritium 5490 5500 3680-7840 A (1 ) The americium-241 in water reported value was higher than the ERA known value. After a thorough review of all data, a definitive reason for the failure could not be determined. GEL assumes an unidentified random error caused the high bias for the batch associated with these samples (Corrective Action CARR1 40520-874).

D-24

LR-N15-0081, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

LR-N15-0081, Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2014

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search