ML19263A853

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:08, 26 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
LER 78-092/04L-0 on 781130:excessive Solute Release from Makeup Water Treatment Waste Neutralizer Tanks to Circulating Water Discharge Tunnel.Believe Method of Determining Solute Concentration Is Unsound
ML19263A853
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 12/27/1978
From: W. Verne Childs
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML19263A844 List:
References
LER-78-092-04L, LER-78-92-4L, NUDOCS 7901030156
Download: ML19263A853 (3)


Text

-,w, .ww.... . . . . , , . . . .w.. . . . . . .

+4NQ PVM48 JOG

'

i7 77)

. ,

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT CONTROL BwOCK: l i

l l l l l lh e

(PLEASE PRINT OR TYPE ALL REQUIRED INFORMATION)

'

O i d 9

[N!YlJlAlFj 1lgl0 l0 LICENSEE CCCE 14 M

-l 0 0l0l0l- 0l0l0l@l4l1l1]1l1l@l LICENSE NUM6E ri 25 26 LiCENn tvet Jo l

57 ui M

]g COvT

" "

011 d

5$ ACE 60 ll @ bt0 l$ l 0DOCK l 0 l 0, 3l 3 l 3 @l 1 l 1 l 3 l 0 l 7 l 8 l@l 1 l 2 l 2 l 7 l 71980l@

ET NuvaER 68 69 EV ENT D ATE 14 lb REPORT DATE EVENT DESCRIPT:ON AND PROS ABLE CONSECUENCES h g , ; Please See Attachment  ;

I ola l I

o a l O S l I

0 is 1 l

Ol7 l 0tHI l 60 7 8 9 SYSTEY C A L'S E CAUSE COYP. VALVE CCCE CCCE SUSCODE COMPONENT CODE SUBCCCE SUBCODE O l ') l -l -l l 0l l l

- -

- l *- l Il Ul l 5l 7 d 9 10 ti 12 13 18 19 N SEOUENTI AL OCCURRENCE REFORT REVISION EVENT YE A9 REPORT NO, CODE TYPE NO.

LER RO h ata(a7 , l7 l8 l -j l 0l 9l 2 l l/l 0 41 lLl l-l l0 l 22 23 l4 26 21 :S  :) JJ 31 32

_:'

SHUTOOWN A TT AC HV E N T NPRD.4 PRIYE COYP. CCYPONENT ACTION FUTURE EFFECT SUPPLIER MANUFACTURER TAKEN ACTICN ON PLANT M E T ** 00 HOURS SU6VI TT E D FORMSUS.

lXlg Glg lJS: [g l 0l 0l 0l 0lda lY@ lN l@ l2 l@ Zl9l9l9l@

J3 s4 l36Zl@ ., 41 42 43 44 47 CAUSE CESCRIPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS h 1

l1 o i Please See Attachment

'

1 i I I

> t>

1 3 l 1

i 4 1 80 7 8 9 ST I' S N POV.ER OTHER ST ATUS Ots O RY OBSCOVERY CESCRiPTIOt i 0 0l0lgl NA l l B [gl Surveillance Sample Analysis l 3

l11 l@

A[Tiv TTY CO TENT AEl.g ASE D OF RF.J.E ASE AYOUNT OF IVITY LOCAllO F RELEA!E i l l 6

8 9 l- l @ lIV- l@l 11 44 45 60 PE H50'.NE L F x *OSua ES NUY8ER TYPE CESCRIPTION l

i i 10101 Ol@l :l@l 13 NA 60 7 8 9 11 12 PERSONNE L INJURIES N Y ER DESCRIPTION 80 F 8 9 11 12 LOSS OF OR D AY AGE TO F ACILITY TY*E CESCRIPTION NA l 7

i o d 9 l Il@l 10 80 PUBLICITY NRC USE ONLY d,

tOSUED DESCRIPTION 2 o l Nlhlto NA l llll1Il1ltil l1 68 69 89 5 7 a 3 W. Verne Childs 315-342-3840 9

"" " 3 7 9 010 3'0"! 5G'"""

-

r

' ATTACIIMENT TO LER-78-092/04L-0 Page 1 of 2 An apparent excessive solute release from the Makeup Water Treatment Waste Neutrali:er Tanks to the Circulating Water Discharge Tunnel was detected while performing the November 197S 24-hour composite sample analysis. The analysis data was in excess of Technical Specification Appendix B, Paragraph 2.2.3 limits in that the analysis indicated the concentration of sodium, iron and sulfate was greater than 5% above Lake Ontario ambient (intake) concentration and total dissolved solid was greater than 1*, above Lake Ontario ambinet (intake).

This is a recurring event (See LER 77-034,77-062, 7S-011,78-024, 78-025,73-028, 78-053, 78-067/04L-1 and 78-OSS/04L-0) in which the composite sampling of the circulating water system discharge tunnel and the method of determining solute concentration and total dissolved solids is unsound. Remedial action to preclude additional recurrence has been initiated as a Technical Specification Amendment request.

Calculations based on

1) Actual neutrali:er tank contents prior to discharge
2) Lake Ontario (intake) ambient concentrations
3) Circulating Water System (dilution) flow rates
4) Tank discharge flow rates show conclusively that the Technical Specification limits of 5% and 1% above ambient could not have been exceeded. These calculations are tabulated on the next page.

ATTACilill!NT TO LER-78-092/O ll,-0 Page 2 of 2 PARAMETiiR INTAKli DISCilARGE NEUTRAI,1 ZER '6 INCREASE APPARENT *s ANAL,Y2ED Concentration Concent rat ion Tank Concentration IN DISC!!ARGE TUNNEL CIIANGE (+)

(By Analysis) (By Analysis) (By Analysis) (By Calc.) (By An.91y7 is)

Turbidity 3.50 3.50 7.0 0.021 0.000 Iron 1.0 1.5 67.5 0.722 +50.0 Calcium (ppm) 37.1 37.1 98.0 0.028 0.00 Sodium (ppm) 12.0 12.74 2000.0 1.790 + 6.52 Magnesium (ppm) 9.1 9.1 21.5 0.025 0.00 Potassium (ppm) 17.2 17.2 13.2 0.008 0.00 Flanganese (ppb) 2.4 1.0 14.72 0.066 -58.3 Chloride (ppm) 53.0 53.5 254.4 0.051 + 0.91 Sulfate (ppm) 27.5 30.0 5900.0 2.294 + 9.09 Phosphate (ppm) 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.011 0.00 Filterable So1 ids 3.0 2.0 15.0 0.054 -33.3 (ppm)

Total Dissolved Solids (ppm) 166.0 240.0 8068.0 0.520 +44.58 NOTE Dilution Ifater: 138,000 Gallons /Flinute X 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> X 60 Minutes /Ilour = 1.99 (E+8) Gallons Dilut ion Factor: Tank content 2.13 (E+4) Gallons / Dilution IVater 1.99 (E+8) Gallons = 1.07 (E-4)

.

  • 4 9

0