ML18184A047

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:18, 20 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2018/07/02 Vogtle COL Docs - FW: Discussion Topic for Future Public Meeting (Tier 2* - ITP)
ML18184A047
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 07/02/2018
From:
NRC
To:
NRC/NRO/DNRL/LB4
References
Download: ML18184A047 (5)


Text

Vogtle PEmails From: Habib, Donald Sent: Monday, July 2, 2018 8:14 PM To: Vogtle PEmails

Subject:

FW: RE: Discussion Topic for Future Public Meeting (Tier 2* - ITP)

Attachments: Proposed License Criterion wording - NH_vB.pdf From: Haggerty, Neil [1]

Sent: Monday, July 02, 2018 4:55 PM To: Habib, Donald <Donald.Habib@nrc.gov>; Hicks, Thomas E. <X2TEHICK@southernco.com>; Amundson, Theodore Edwin <X2TAMUNS@southernco.com>; Redd, Jason P. <JPREDD@southernco.com>; Roberts, Kelli Anne

<KROBERTS@southernco.com>

Cc: Sparkman, Wesley A. <WASPARKM@southernco.com>; Aughtman, Amy G. <AGAUGHTM@SOUTHERNCO.COM>;

Chamberlain, Amy Christine <ACCHAMBE@southernco.com>; Dixon-Herrity, Jennifer <Jennifer.Dixon-Herrity@nrc.gov>;

Kavanagh, Kerri <Kerri.Kavanagh@nrc.gov>; Patel, Chandu <Chandu.Patel@nrc.gov>; Prescott, Paul

<Paul.Prescott@nrc.gov>; Bradford, Anna <Anna.Bradford@nrc.gov>; Vogtle PEmails <Vogtle.PEmails@nrc.gov>

Subject:

[External_Sender] RE: Discussion Topic for Future Public Meeting (Tier 2* - ITP)

Don, We drafted a response to the question from ITP. Please forward this to them in support of a discussion on Thursday, 7/5, morning.

Thank you, Neil Haggerty

__________________________________

Neil Haggerty l Southern Nuclear Operating Company Nuclear Development Regulatory Affairs - VEGP 3&4 Licensing SNC-Inverness: 205.992.7047 l office: 301.874.8537 l mobile: 240.566.2442 x2nhagge@southernco.com neil.haggerty@excelservices.com This e-mail and any attachments thereto are intended only for the use by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain proprietary and confidential information. If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify me by telephone and permanently delete the original and any copy of any e-mail and any printout thereof.

From: Habib, Donald [2]

Sent: Friday, June 29, 2018 3:13 PM To: Haggerty, Neil <X2NHAGGE@SOUTHERNCO.COM>; Hicks, Thomas E. <X2TEHICK@southernco.com>;

Amundson, Theodore Edwin <X2TAMUNS@southernco.com>; Redd, Jason P. <JPREDD@southernco.com>

Cc: Sparkman, Wesley A. <WASPARKM@southernco.com>; Aughtman, Amy G.

<AGAUGHTM@SOUTHERNCO.COM>; Chamberlain, Amy Christine <ACCHAMBE@southernco.com>; Dixon-Herrity, Jennifer <Jennifer.Dixon-Herrity@nrc.gov>; Kavanagh, Kerri <Kerri.Kavanagh@nrc.gov>; Patel, Chandu

<Chandu.Patel@nrc.gov>; Prescott, Paul <Paul.Prescott@nrc.gov>; Bradford, Anna <Anna.Bradford@nrc.gov>;

Vogtle PEmails <Vogtle.PEmails@nrc.gov>

Subject:

Discussion Topic for Future Public Meeting (Tier 2* - ITP) 1

Neil et al. -

The staff would like to discuss the discussion topic at the public meeting on July 5.

Thanks Don Habib Project Manager NRO/DLSE, Licensing Branch 4 O-8D13 301-415-1035 In Vogtle Electric Generating Plants (VGEPs) Units 3 and 4 Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR), Chapter 14, Initial Test Program, Revision 6, it states that the overall objective of the initial test program is to demonstrate that the plant has been constructed as designed, that the systems perform consistent with the plant design, and that activities culminating in operation at full licensed power including initial fuel load, initial criticality, and power ascension are performed in a controlled and safe manner.

Special tests to further establish a unique phenomenological performance parameter of the AP1000 design features beyond testing performed for Design Certification of the AP600 and that will not change from plant to plant, are performed for the first plant only. Because of the standardization of the AP1000 design, these special tests (designated as first plant only tests) are not required on follow plants. These first plant only tests are identified in the individual test descriptions (See Subsections 14.2.9 and 14.2.10 of the VEGP 3&4 FSAR). The following is a listing of the first plant only tests, and the corresponding section in which they appear:

First Plant Only Test Section IRWST Heatup Test 14.2.9.1.3 Item (h)

Pressurizer Surge Line Stratification Evaluation 14.2.9.1.7 Item (d)

Reactor Vessel Internals Vibration Testing 14.2.9.1.9 - Prototype Test

[Natural Circulation Tests]* 14.2.10.3.6, [14.2.10.3.7]*

Rod Cluster Control Assembly Out of Bank Measurements 14.2.10.4.6 Load Follow Demonstration 14.2.10.4.22 Other special tests which further establish a unique phenomenological performance parameter of theAP1000 design features beyond testing performed for Design Certification for the AP600 and that will not change from plant to plant, are performed for the first three plants. Because of the standardization of the AP1000 design, once these special tests have affirmed consistent passive system function they are not required on follow plants. These tests required on the first three plants are identified in the individual test descriptions (See Subsection 14.2.9). The following is a listing of the tests required on the first three plants, and the corresponding section in which they appear.

First Three Plant Tests Section Core Makeup Tank Heated Recirculation Tests 14.2.9.1.3 Items (k) and (w)

ADS Blowdown Test 14.2.9.1.3 Item (s)

These tests are Tier 2*, as described in the VEGP 3&4 FSAR.

In letter dated December 21, 2017, Southern Nuclear Operating Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Units 3 and 4 Request for License Amendment and Exemption: Changes to Tier2* Departure Evaluation Process (LAR-17-037), the licensee requests to apply the existing departure evaluation 2

process for Tier 2 departures in the evaluation of certain Tier 2* departures. This would entail an exemption from certain change requirements in 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix D, to allow departures form Tier 2* information evaluated against criteria proposed in a new License Condition without a license amendment by expanding the applicability of the existing Tier 2 evaluation process.

The staff did not identify in the VEGP 3&4 FSAR chapter, Tier 1 Revision 5, any Tier 1 Inspection, Tests, Analyses and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC), with the exception of the natural circulation test, that address the first-plant-only and third-plant-only tests described to be performed in accordance with Tier 2.

The staff is concerned that SNC would be able to make certain changes to the Tier 2* test descriptions without NRC approval. In particular, where a change to a Tier 2* test description would influence the outcome of the test such that it would affect whether the corresponding Tier 1 acceptance criteria would be met, the change should require NRC approval.

The staff would like SNC to discuss either revising SNCs proposed screening criteria license condition to assure that such a change would come to NRC for approval, or explaining why it is not necessary.

3

Hearing Identifier: Vogtle_COL_Docs_Public Email Number: 310 Mail Envelope Properties (BY1PR09MB0935FE8D1C10AB3768C139C897420)

Subject:

FW: RE: Discussion Topic for Future Public Meeting (Tier 2* - ITP)

Sent Date: 7/2/2018 8:14:26 PM Received Date: 7/2/2018 8:14:31 PM From: Habib, Donald Created By: Donald.Habib@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Vogtle PEmails" <Vogtle.PEmails@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: BY1PR09MB0935.namprd09.prod.outlook.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 7793 7/2/2018 8:14:31 PM Proposed License Criterion wording - NH_vB.pdf 705522 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

LAR-17-037 - ITP Question Proposed License Condition:

(13) Departures from Plant-specific DCD Tier 2* Information SNC is exempt from the requirements of 10 CFR Part 52, Appendix D, Paragraphs ragraphs II.F and pproval oval via a license VIII.B.6 that invoke the Tier 2* change process that requires prior NRC approval lice R

amendment for departures from Tier 2* information; and Paragraph h VIII.B.5.a for Tier Tie 2 information that involves a change to, or departure from, Tier 2** information; information; eexcep for except departures from Tier 2* information that:

AF

  • * *
6. Results in a material change to the Passive Residuall Heat Removal Remov Heat Exchanger (first culation ation Tests (first plant test), the Core Makeup Tank Heated Recirculation (f th three plants test), or the Automatic Depressurization System Blowdownown Test (first three plants test);

(7 T Criterion 6 (Initial Test Program) detailed guidance:

A material change influences the outcome of the e:

he test such thatt iti would uld affect whether whe the test

/5 re objectives or performance criteria would be met.

x The following are examples of material terial erial changes:

eration of a test o The addition, deletion, or alteration t step o Alteration of a detail that serves as the basis basi forr acceptance ceptance in an NRCN Final Safety

/2 sp Evaluation Report (F ((FSER) related to ththe aff affectedd test x The following examplesmples ar are not mate material changes:

cha  :

o Editorial changesnges ons to improve o Clarifications impro reader rea nd anding understanding 01 o o Correction on of inconsis inconsistenc inconsistencies within n the document w which are clearly discernible (e.g., between secti ons) sections)s) hanges o Changes nges that do not cchange the e meaning or substa substance of o information presented (e.g.,

n reformatting or removing rem ail as described in NEI detail N 98-03, 9 Revision 1, Guidelines for Updatin Final Updating Fina Safety S nalysis alysis Reports Analysis Reports, Se Section A4 [ADAMS Accession Number

8) s ML003779028]

ML003779028])

e Criterion 6 (Initial itial Test Te Program) am)) Bases:

am Bases:

Ba The VEGP 3 an and 4 Plant-specific

-specific specific Tier 1 DCD does not contain information related to the special tests that th establish es que a unique e phenomenological phenomen performance parameter of the AP1000 design features beyond b rformed formed for Design testing performed D Desig Certification for the AP600 and that will not change from om p plant. Proposed Criterion n 6 would wo pr provide assurance that material changes to Tier 2*

Dinfo information related to these special ciall tests VEGP 3 and 4 plant-specific Tier 2 DCD are:

x tes would receive prior NRC approval. The special tests (i.e.,

ffirst plant tests and first three plant ttests) for which some Tier 2* information is contained in the Passive Residual Heat Removal Heat Exchanger (first plant test) identified in UFSAR Section 14.2.10.4.29, x Core Makeup Tank Heated Recirculation Tests (first three plants test) identified in UFSAR Section 14.2.9.1.3 Items (k) and (w)), and x Automatic Depressurization System Blowdown Test (first three plants test) identified in UFSAR Section 14.2.9.1.3 Item (s)).