ML101170121

Revision to the 2009 Annual Report

ML101170121
Person / Time
Site:	U.S. Geological Survey
Issue date:	04/19/2010
From:	Timothy Debey US Dept of Interior, Geological Survey (USGS)
To:	Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML101170121 (7)

Text

V, ..i m US0%%S science for a changing world Department of the Interior US Geological Survey Box 25046 MS-974 Denver CO, 80225 April 19, 2010 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington DC 20555

Dear NRC staff,

A revision to the 2009 annual report is herein submitted for the U.S. Geological Survey TRIGA non-power reactor facility.

The revised sections are denoted by vertical bars in the right side margin. This report is generated in compliance with our license conditions.

The facility docket number is 50-274.Sincerely, Timothy M. DeBey Reactor Supervisor Enclosure Copy to: Linh Tran, MS OWFN 12H15 CKOY-O o Lk I U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TRIGA REACTOR ANNUAL REPORT JANUARY 1, 2009 -DECEMBER 31, 2009 NRC LICENSE NO. R-113 -DOCKET NO. 50-274 I. Personnel Changes: Greg Lightner (Reactor HP Tech) retired from the facility in March 2009.Darrell Liles (Reactor HP) left the facility in June 2009.Benjamin Boyle was hired as a student employee and began working on May 11, 2009.Karl Frank was hired as a student employee and began working on November 9, 2009.II. Operating Experience The Geological Survey TRIGA Reactor (GSTR) was in normal operation for the year 2009. No major facility changes were made during the year.A synopsis of irradiations performed during the year is given below, listed by the organization submitting the samples to the reactor staff: Organization Geologic Discipline

-INAA Geologic Discipline

-Geochronology Non-USGS Total Number of Samples 1084 779 2249 4112 A. Thermal power calibrations were performed in January and July, with minor adjustments made to the instrumentation.

2 B. During the report period, 185 daily checklists and 12 monthly checklists were completed in compliance with technical specifications requirements for surveillance of the reactor facility.C. Tours were provided to individuals and groups during the year for a total visitor count of approximately 400.Ill. Tabulation of Energy Generated MWH operated Jan Feb Mar May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Totals 31.010 40.767 47.783 25.563 16.655 37.866 52.159 23.101 67.742 51.948 61.820 37.225 493.639 Critical hours 49h 4m 45h 15m 51h 1m 28h 9m 20h 35m 40h 39m 60h 17m 28h 4m 71h 28m 56h 13m 74h 49m 46h 6m 571h 40m Pulses 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 11 0 14 IV. Unscheduled Shutdowns Number Date 1044 1045 1046 1047 1048 1049 1050 1051 1052 1053 1054 1055 1056 1057 1058 1059 01/12/09 02/05/09 03/19/09 05/14/09 05/14/09 05/14/09 06/15/09 06/22/09 07/01/09 07/02/09 07/02/09 07/06/09 07/06/09 07/07/09 08/04/09 08/04/09 Cause DAC DIS064 timeout NP1000 hi power due to trainee error DAC DIS064 timeout NP1000 hi power NP1000 hi power NP1000 hi power due to sample unloading DAC DIS064 timeout NPP1000 hi power DAC DIS064 timeout DAC DIS064 timeout DAC DIS064 timeout DAC DIS064 timeout DAC DIS064 timeout DAC DIS064 timeout DAC DIS064 timeout DAC DIS064 timeout 3 1060 08/24/09 DAC DIS064 timeout 1061 09/17/09 DAC DIS064 timeout 1062 09/21/09 DAC DIS064 timeout 1063 09/23/09 DAC DIS064 timeout 1064 12/15/09 NET Fault 1065 12/30/09 NET Fault V. Significant Maintenance Operations 01/09 Replaced select potentiometers

& capacitors and resoldered several connections in NPP1000, NM1000 & DAC 04/09 Replaced ISS transmitter board on weather station 07/09 Replaced fan pulleys and belts on main exhaust 07/09 Repaired and refurbished secondary tank and associated piping 07/09 Replaced hi & lo end adjust potentiometers (R102 & R103) in NM1000 Campbelling module 07/09 Replaced DIS064 board in DAC 08/09 Replaced Mylar window on G5000 swipe counter detector 09/09 Replaced pre-filters

& HEPA filters and performed DOP test on 151 fume hoods 10/09 Replaced purification system skimmer 11/09 Replaced bulb in NE tank light 12/09 Replaced purification system pre-filter and resealed conductivity probes 12/09 Performed routine biennial control rod inspections.

During this maintenance, the pulse rod position was lowered 1.125" to make it more centrally-located in the reactor core.VI. Summary of 10 CFR 50.59 changes There were two 50.59 changes that were evaluated, approved, and implemented in CY 2009. One was to change the way printing is done from the CSC computer.

The change involved adding a parallel-to-USB conversion process to allow a USB printer to be used. The second 50.59 change involved security system upgrades that were performed as part of a NNSA-sponsored program to enhance facility security.VII. Radioactivity Releases A. Listed below are the total amounts of radioactive gaseous effluent released to the environment beyond the effective control of the reactor facility.Table 1. Gaseous Effluents Released to the Environment Month Argon-41 R-113 License Tritium (HTO 10CFR20 Allowable (mCi) Allowable (Ci) (Ci) (mCi)January 0.308 5.833 0.0 124 February 0.314 5.833 0.132 124 March 0.285 5.833 0.0 124 4 Month Argon-41 R-113 License Tritium (ETO 10CFR20 Allowable (mCi)

• Allowable (Ci) (Ci) (mCi)April 0.121 5.833 0.0 124 May 0.044 5.833 0.0 124 June 0.157 5.833 0.133 124 July 0.534 5.833 0.0 124 August 0.088 5.833 0.132 124 September 0.533 5.833 0.0 124 October**

0.517 5.833 0.0 124 November 0.535 5.833 0.0 124 December 0.175 5.833 0.0 124 Total 3.60 70.00 0.490 1488% of Allowable 5.1% 0.033%* Note: The tritium concentrations are estimates based on the amount of water lost by evaporation from the reactor multiplied by the concentration of tritium as HTO.Tritium sample analyses were performed by Test America Laboratories.

• • Note: Minor contamination event in October resulted in a release of 1.43 pCi of Co-60 through the normal air exhaust on the roof, resulting in an annual average airborne release of 9.61x10-1 4 pCi/ml. This annual average airborne effluent release is 0.19% of the 10 CFR Appendix B limit of 5x1 0-11 pCi/ml for Co-60.B. Two solid low-level waste shipments, totaling 15 cu.ft., part of which was reactor generated, were made this calendar year.VIII. Radiation Monitoring Our program to monitor and control radiation exposures included the four major elements below during the operating year.1. Fifteen gamma-sensitive area monitors are located throughout the Nuclear Science Building.

A remote readout panel is located in the reactor health physics office. High alarm set points range from 2 mR/hr to 50 mR/hr. High level alarms are very infrequent and due to sample movements.

2. One Continuous Air Monitor (CAM) samples the air in the reactor bay. An equilibrium concentration of about 1 x 10-8 jtCi/ml present for two minutes will result in an increase of about 400 cpm above background.

The alarm setpoints are a low-level alarm set at 3000 cpm and the high level alarm set at 10000 cpm. Reactor bay air is sampled during all reactor operations.

The fixed particulate air filter is changed each week and counted on a HPGE gamma spectrometer counting system. The charcoal filter, fitted behind the air filter, is also changed and counted weekly. In all instances, sample data were less than airborne concentration values in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table 2 for all particulate radioisotopes produced by the reactor.5

3. Contamination wipe surveys and radiation surveys with portable survey instruments are performed at least once a month. All portable instruments are calibrated with a 3-Curie (initial activity)

Cs-1 37 source traceable to NBS, and wipes are counted on a Gamma Products G5000 low level counting system. Other than the contamination event of 10/22/09, the highest removable contamination found was equal to 94 pCi/1 00 cm 2 beta, near the back door of the storage building (Bldg 10). No areas were greater than 15 pCi/1 00 cm 2 alpha contamination.

The contamination event of 10/22/09 is detailed in another report, but it resulted in a maximum beta activity of 2812 pCi/100 cm 2 in the reactor room near the reactor tank. This contamination was quickly identified and cleaned.The roof area over the reactor tank is roped off and posted as a radiation area (averaging 2.5 mR/hr) during 1 MW operations.

4. LiF TLD dosimeters were used at four outdoor environmental stations.

Reactor facility visitors are issued self-reading dosimeters.

Reactor staff personnel are issued beta, gamma, albedo neutron badges.Table 2. Personnel Monitoring Results (12/1/08 -11/30/09)Employee code Whole Body (Rem) Whole Body (Rem) Extremity (Rem)Deep Dose Equiv. Shallow Dose Equiv.E0888 0.064 0.066 0.244 E0304 0 0 0 E0996 0.034 0.034 0 E0607 0.187 0.188 0.336 E0707 0.017 0.017 0.079 E0908 0.022 0.022 0.085 E0509 0.010 0.011 0 E1109 0 0 0 Reactor visitors and occasional experimenters wore pocket dosimeters that resulted in no individual's reading that was greater than 5.3 mrem.Table 3. Environmental Dose Results Location Dose Dose Dose Dose Total Jan-Mar Apr-June July-Sept.

Oct.- Dec.(RAD (RAD) (RAD) (RAD) (RAD)Exhaust 0.045 0.015 0.023** 0.033 0.116 Stack Cooling 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.003 0.003 Tower Fence West Vehicle 0.009 0.002 0.007 0.008 0.024 Gate West Room 0.022 0.017 0.011 0.020 0.070 151 Gate 6 Southwest 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.004 0.004 Light Pole Control 0.047 0.038 0.051 0.048 0.184 (background)

Southeast 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 Light Pole I I Note: Above totals have the background subtracted (see control).

Environmental TLDs were supplied and analyzed by Global Dosimetry Solutions.

• • The exhaust stack dosimeter was knocked off of the exhaust duct by a severe hail storm in July and therefore this reading is lower than it should have been.X. Environmental Monitoring There was a minor contamination event in October that resulted in a release of 1.43 pCi of Co-60 through the normal air exhaust on the roof. Routine biennial environmental soil and water samples will be taken in the summer of 2010.7