|
---|
Category:E-Mail
MONTHYEARML21287A4512021-10-15015 October 2021 Email for NuScale Topical Report Quality Assurance Program Description Topical Report -A Version Verification ML21154A1322021-05-26026 May 2021 Final Safety Evaluation Transmittal Email ML21053A2662021-02-22022 February 2021 SMR DC Docs - FW: NuScale EPZ Review Path Forward ML20203M1872020-07-14014 July 2020 Control Room Staffing Topical Report - NRC Staff'S Documentation of the Results of the Completeness Review ML20190A2352020-07-0808 July 2020 SMR DC Docs - Approved Version of NuScale Topical Report, Rod Ejection Accident Methodology, TR-0716-50350, Revision 1 ML20141L6102020-05-20020 May 2020 SMR DC Docs - NuScale Topical Report - Approved Version of NuScale Applicability of Areva Method for the Evaluation of Fuel Assembly Structural Response to Externally Applied Forces, TR-07116-50351, Revision 1 ML20090A8642020-03-30030 March 2020 SMR DC Docs - NuScale Topical Report - Approved Version of TR-0516-49417, Evaluation Methodology for the Stability of the NuScale Power Module, Revision 1 ML19331A7302019-11-27027 November 2019 SMR DC Docs - FW: Ibr Flow Chart ML19331A7382019-11-27027 November 2019 SMR DC Docs - FW: Chapter 18 (Di IP) Related (non-prop) ML19331A7262019-11-26026 November 2019 SMR DC Docs - (External_Sender) Ibr Flow Chart ML19329E7132019-11-25025 November 2019 SMR DC Docs - FW: Chapter 18 (Di IP) Related ML19323F6982019-11-19019 November 2019 DCA Technical Specification Confirmatory Items - Email Commitments ML19329E7022019-11-0606 November 2019 SMR DC Docs - (External_Sender) Chapter 18 (Di IP) Related ML19309D7862019-10-31031 October 2019 Reconciliation - NRR Response to Acrs' September 20 2019 Letter on NuScale Stability Analysis Topical Report ML19309E0172019-10-31031 October 2019 Reconciliation - NRR Response to Acrs'S September 24 2019 Letter on NuScale External Forces Topical Report ML19309F8612019-10-31031 October 2019 Reconciliation - NRR Response to Acrs'S September 25, 2019 Letter on the Focus Area Review Approach ML19276D2812019-10-0303 October 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 526 Erai No. 9719 ML19235A1092019-08-23023 August 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 525 Erai No. 9705 (19.02) ML19206B0772019-07-25025 July 2019 SMR DC Docs - FW: FW: NuScale Chapter 5 Section 5.2.3 - Changes to Information on Check Valves ML19171A0092019-06-20020 June 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 524 Erai No. 9691 (3.9.4) ML19157A0352019-06-0606 June 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 523 Erai No. 9682 (12.3-12.4, 9.3.2) ML19150A3172019-05-30030 May 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 522 Erai No. 9681 (14) ML19151A0272019-05-30030 May 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 522 Erai No. 9681 (14) ML19099A1272019-04-0909 April 2019 SMR DC Docs - FW: NuScale Comments Chapter 5 SER W/Ois ML19098A2362019-04-0808 April 2019 SMR DC Docs - FW: NuScale Comments Chapter 5 SER W/Ois ML19089A0112019-03-29029 March 2019 SMR DC Docs - NuScale Topical Report - Approved Version of Subchannel Analysis Methodology, TR-0915-17564, Revision 2 ML19081A2722019-03-22022 March 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 521 Erai No. 9672 (19) ML19079A3632019-03-20020 March 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 520 Erai No. 9642 (16) ML19077A2852019-03-18018 March 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 519 Erai No. 9656 (12.03) ML19063D4042019-03-0404 March 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 518 Erai No. 9659 (19) ML19062A0012019-03-0303 March 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 518 Erai No. 9659 (19) ML19057A4382019-02-26026 February 2019 SMR DC Docs - March 5, 2019, Public/Closed Meeting on NuScale EPZ Sizing Methodology Topical Report_Nrc Staff Talking Points (Public) ML19056A5062019-02-25025 February 2019 SMR DC RAI - FW: Request for Additional Information No. 365 RAI No. 9309 (3.8.4) Rev 1 (to Remove Prop from Previous Subject Line) ML19046A0672019-02-15015 February 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 517 Erai No. 9657 (12.03) ML19032A1202019-02-0101 February 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 516 Erai No. 9647 (15.0.6) ML19016A2692019-01-16016 January 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 515 Erai No. 9607 (12.02) Revision 1 ML19015A2782019-01-15015 January 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 366 RAI No. 9292 (12.3) ML19015A2742019-01-15015 January 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 486 Erai No. 9296 (12.3) ML19014A0882019-01-14014 January 2019 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 515 Erai No. 9607 (12.02) ML19014A0842019-01-14014 January 2019 SMR DC RAI - FW: Request for Additional Information No. 371 RAI No. 9373 (15.06.06) ML19003A1772019-01-0303 January 2019 SMR DC Docs - Approved Version of NuScale Topical Report TR-0616-48793, Nuclear Analysis Codes and Methods Qualification, Revision 1 ML19003A4612019-01-0303 January 2019 SMR DC Docs - Approved Version of Topical Report TR-0116-21012, NuScale Power Critical Heat Flux Corrections, Revision 1 ML18352B0812018-12-18018 December 2018 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 513 Erai No. 9643 (4.04) ML18352B0852018-12-18018 December 2018 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 514 Erai No. 9645 (4.04) ML18341A3452018-12-0707 December 2018 SMR DC RAI - NuScale Request for Additional Information -eRAI No. 9631, Section 6.2.6 - Cancelled ML18333A0212018-11-29029 November 2018 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 512 Erai No. 9634 (16) ML18324A8142018-11-20020 November 2018 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 511 Erai No. 9613 (12.02) ML18312A2492018-11-0808 November 2018 SMR DC Docs - FW: NuScale FSAR Draft Changes in Section 2.4.4 ML18309A2642018-11-0505 November 2018 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 510 Erai No. 9631 (6.2.6) ML18296A2342018-10-23023 October 2018 SMR DC RAI - Request for Additional Information No. 509 Erai No. 9608 (14.3.8) 2021-05-26
[Table view] |
Text
The initiating event of the rod ejection accident is the rapid ejection of a control rod (CR) caused by an assumed control rod housing failure as described in Standard Review Plan (SRP) Section 15.4.8 and Regulatory Guide 1.77.
The requirement to evaluate the rod ejection accident is given by General Design Criterion (GDC) 28 which states, The reactivity control systems shall be designed with appropriate limits on the potential amount and rate of reactivity increase to assure that the effects of postulated reactivity accidents can neither (1) result in damage to the reactor coolant pressure boundary greater than limited local yielding nor (2) sufficiently disturb the core, its support structures or other reactor pressure vessel internals to impair significantly the capability to cool the core.
These postulated reactivity accidents shall include consideration of rod ejection (unless prevented by positive means), rod dropout, steam line rupture, changes in reactor coolant temperature and pressure, and cold water addition. Consistent with GDC 28, SRP 15.0 classifies control rod ejection as a postulated accident as does NuScale in Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) Section 15.4.8.1. A conservative initial condition assumes the regulating control rods are at rod insertion limit defined by technical specifications. Following the rod ejection, a reactor trip occurs on either a high flux rate, high flux or high pressurizer pressure inserting the remaining control rods. The emergency core cooling systems (ECCS) will actuate either when the inadvertant actuation block (IAB) clears or when containment or reactor coolant system (RCS) level setpoints are reached. According to 10 CFR Part 50.46 (iii)(5), "After any calculated successful initial operation of the ECCS, the calculated core temperature shall be maintained at an acceptably low value and decay heat shall be removed for the extended period of time required by the long-lived radioactivity remaining in the core." In addition, SRP Section 15.4.8 indicates that GDC 28 provides assurance that the capability to bring the reactor to a safe shutdown condition will not be impaired by a control rod ejection accident. As described in FSAR 15.4.8.3.2, conservative scram characteristics are applied as the, "highest worth [control rod assembly (CRA)] (other than the ejected rod) remains stuck out of the core." While the effects of the ejected rod and fully stuck rod are addressed in the short term, it is unclear if the long term effects have been evaluated. The staff notes that NuScale has requested an exemption to GDC 27, as documented in SECY 18-0099 (ADAMS ML18065A431). SECY 18-0099 states that the staff intends to apply demonstration that Specified Acceptable Fuel Design Limits (SAFDLs) are not exceeded for postulated accidents that result in a return to power as the part of the technical basis for reviewing the GDC 27 exemption. However, the return to power analysis in FSAR 15.0.6 only evaluates a single stuck rod and not the combined loss of reactivity associated with an ejected rod and stuck rod. To demonstrate that the minimum critical heat flux (CHF) in FSAR 15.0.6 analyses (which is the long-term analysis that applies to all Chapter 15 events that can result in a return to power) bounds the scenario where ECCS actuates due to the ejected rod and stuck rod, the staff is requesting justification that the current return to power analyses in FSAR 15.0.6 bound this scenario, at any time in the cycle. The justification should address all effects that could either reduce shutdown margin or lead to a return to power, including core boron dilution (see RAI 8930, effects from soluble boron plate-out, boron lost to the lower part of containment and diluted condensate return to the reactor pressure vessel via the reactor recirculation valves, etc.).