ML18096B356

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:16, 12 December 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Salem Unit 2 Cycle 8 Peaking Factor Limit Rept.
ML18096B356
Person / Time
Site: Salem PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 02/11/1993
From: GREEN L, JOSEPHIC K E
Public Service Enterprise Group
To:
Shared Package
ML18096B354 List:
References
CDC-93-039, CDC-93-39, NUDOCS 9303290079
Download: ML18096B356 (3)


Text

  • CDC-93-039 Ref.: PNH-93-007-0 SALEM UNIT 2 CYCLE 8 PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT

/e K.

Core Design C D<f1 VERIFIED:

L. Core Design C ( 9303290079 I PDR . ADOCK 05000311 1 I p PDR I Date: ___ 2...,.4'"i'11A

..... n-=------1 of 3

-' * *

  • RADIAL PEAKING FACTOR LIMIT REPORT This radial Peaking Factor Limit Report is provided in accordance with Paragraph 6.9.1.10 of the Salem Unit 2 Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications.

The F:icy limits for RATED THERMAL POYER within specific core plaries for Cycle 8 shall be: 1. For all core planes containing Bank "D" control Rods: ltlP F:q s 2.23 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points 1 through 61, inclusive).

2. For all unrodded planes: ltlP F:q s 1.69 for all core elevations (INCORE axial points 1 through 61, inclusive.

These Fzy(z) limits were used to confirm that the heat flux hot changed factor F 0 (z) will be limited to the Technical Specification values of: F 0 (z) s [2.p32]' [K(z) for P > 0.5, and [K(z)] for P s 0.5 assuming the most lilliting axial power distributions expected to result from the insertion and removal of control Banks C and D during operation, including the accompanying variations in the axial xenon and power di*tributions as described in the "Power Distribution Control and Load Following Procedures", WCAP-8385, September, 1974. Therefore, these Fzy limits provide assurance that the initial conditions assumed in the LOCA analysis are met, along with the ECCS acceptance criteria of 10CFR50.46.

See Figure 1 for a plot of (FJ. Pb/] versus Axial Core Height. 2 of 3

.. 2.4 2.2 l"1 c 2.0 -

a.. [ . -1.4 -1.2 * ... *-, ... r

  • F'IGURE 1 HAXIHUH (raT*PREL)

VERSUS AXIAL CORE HEIGHT CURING NORMAL CORE OPERATION I 6 .2.32 I r-r-. 1:1 l"I -c [ 1:1 .. CCL -

c, c IJ I.I 1w

  • c IJ c 2 4 6 8 CORE t£1GHT (FEET) 3 of 3 i"""-o -10.8 2.181 !'\ .. Cl [ c \ \ \ .l 1 \ \ c\ ' 12.1.5 l i;;i 10 12