ML20134C579
| ML20134C579 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 10/23/1994 |
| From: | Summers J Public Service Enterprise Group |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20134C519 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-96-351 NUDOCS 9702030190 | |
| Download: ML20134C579 (46) | |
Text
_
SALEM / MAINTENANCE Page _L. of _L SC.MD-GP.SW 4001(Q)- REV. 5 1
SERVICE WATER SILT SURVEY j
i l
USE CATEGORY : H REVISION
SUMMARY
+
Revised procedure from Category III to Category II
+
Deleted former Step 3.2: Inform diving contractor desilting discharge bose shall be m=*M to hose fitting on sea wall
+
Added Step 3.2: Nittia! discharge is pumped thrair,h piping to designated area determined by Site Services 4
Added Step 5.2.1: If des 11 ting /defouling is required from previous survey and data, ga to Step 5.3
+
Added Note to Step 5.2.3: Maximum silt buildup of 3 ft. allowable between pump suction and approximately 6 ft forward (river side) of stop log guide
+
Added Note to Step 5.2.5: Coverage factor is tMek=ne of growth on walls in inches X WW of coverage. Example: 0.50 in. growth x 50% coverage equals.25 coverage factor j
+
Deleted former Step 5.2.5: Contact Service Water System Engineer to review data to determine if desilting/defouling ia required i
+
Revised Step 5.2.6: If biofouling 2.25 coverage factor, defauling is required
+
Added Step 5.2.7: If sik level 23 ft., desilting is required
+
Added Step 5.2.8: If desilting/defouling is required, obtain desilting permit and setnink job 4
+
Added Step 5.3.1: Diver (s) should verify designated bay to be entered
+
Added Step 5.3.5: Forward copy of Attachments 2 and 3 to Service Water System Engineer i
I i
i IMPLEMENTATION REQUIREMENTS
+
None APPROVED:
b C:r;Ls 4w m/Ar/pr 4
%neddanager - Salem Date~
e 9702030190 970116,'
[L '
1:
- PDR,
s SC.WGP.SW.0001(Q)
SERVICE WATER SILT SURVEY TABLE OF_CONTEN'IS SECTION TITLE FAGE 1.0 PURPOSE
............................................2 2.0 PREREQUISITES........................................ 2 3.0 PRECAUTIONS AND LIMITATIONS...........................
2 4.0 BQUIPMENT/ MATERIAL REQUIRED..........................
2 5.0 PROCEDURE..........................................
3 4
5.1 Pmnquisites, Precautions and Limitations Review..............
3 5.2 Silt and Biological Fouling Suney........................
3 5.3 Removal of Silt and Biological Pouling.....................
4 6.0 RECORDS............................................ 5 4
7.0 REFERENCES
.......................................... 5 ATTACHMENTS i
Service Water Bay Sectional View........................
6 Service Water Silt Survey Map..........................
7 Data Sheet
......................................8 Salem banmon Page 1 d 9 Rev.5
... -. - - _ ~.
= - -
SC.vnaP.SW.o00nm i
1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 To provide instructions for desilting and wall cleaning /biofouling rusnoval of service j
water bays.
1.2
'this procedure is to detennine and document condition of silt buildup and biofouling i
C0297 in service water bay areas.
i 2.0 PREREQUISITES
( )~
2.1 1he individual assigned to perform this promdure is qualified IAW NC.NA-AP.ZZ 0014(Q), Training, Quahfication and Certification l
1
()
2.2 VERIFY tagging is complete IAW NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0015(Q), Safety Tagging Program, I
j
()
2.3 N01TFY Licensing approwl=*-4 two weeks prior to des ~dting to allow sufficient time to obtain required pumping pennit from Army Corps of hMrs.
l
()
2.4 ADVISE diving contractor of required services.
()
2.5 ENSURE proper equipment is available for silt and biofouling resnoval.
()
2.6 VERIFY SNSS/NSS has signed Work Activity Sheet authorizing work to start.
3.0 PRECAUTIONS ANDIJMITATIONS e
l
()
3.1 If required, desilting is to be performed between Sept.1 and March 1. If desilting is required at any oths tiene after Match I to Sept.1, it will require an Emergeocy
]
Desilting Permit.
I
()
3.2 D-iiWg discharge is pumped through piping to designated area determined by Site Services.
()
3.3 Maximum sitt buildup of 3 ft. allowable between pump artian and approrimeraly 6 ft.
forward (river side) of stop log guide.
()
3.4 Diver (s) should ENSURE they are entering designated bay tagged IAW NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0015(Q).
4 i
4.0 EOUIPMENT/ MATERIAL REOUIRED 4.1 Additinnal Tools and Equipment 4
supplied by diving contractor t
Sem Common Page 2 or9 m.v. 5 d
SC.1@-GP.SW-0001(Q) 5.0 DLOCEDURE 5.1 Per-ai=i'a' h= =:m and ii=ftzdans Review
()
5.1.1 VERIFY all prerequisites requimd to start job have been met.
1 l
()
5.1.2 VERIFY all precautions and limitations have been reviewed.
i 5.2 Kil' =ad hh= leaf Fadia* Survey t
l
()
5.2.1 If desdting/defouling is mpired from previous survey and data, GO TO Step 5.3.
MQIE L
2 contains description of area to tm surveyed.
1
()
5.2.2 Diver (s) should VERIFY they are entering designated bay tagged IAW 2
NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0015(Q).
i NOTE Maximum sRt buldup of 3 ft, allowable between pump suction and approxirnately 8 ft.
1 forward (river side) of stop log guide.
I
()
5.2.3 Snaarvisar Nneifu = tina
}
OBTAIN profile infonnation to nenmat 1/2 ft. RECORD survey data on Attach===t 2.
i
()
5.2.4 INSPECT pump bay for additional nadimaat, damage or corrosion.
1 RECORD in Cammanta Section of Attmeh===t 3.
i NOTE l
Coverage factor is thickness of growth on walls in inches X percentage of coverage.
Example: 0.50 in. growth X 50% coverage equals.25 coverage factor.
i
()
5.2.5 Enaarvimr NatiR-atian i
INSPECT pump bay walls for biological growth coverage factor (i.e., shells).
RECORD wi Attachmaat 3.
l
)
()
5.2.6 If biofouling k.25 coverage factor, defouhng is mquired. RECORD on A++ackmaat 3.
()
5.2.7 If sik level k3 ft., desihing is requised. RECORD en Attmehment 3.
l S.ie. Common Page 3 of 9 Rev.5
)
SC.MD-GP.SW-0001(Q) i
()
5.2.8 Sgpervisor.. Notification If desilting/defouling is mquimd, OBTAIN desilting permit and SCHEDULB job. RECORD on Attachment 3.
5.3 Damaval of silt and nintn,W1 peti,
()
5.3.1 Diver (s) should VERIFY designated bay to be entemd.
l
()
5.3.2 ENSURE Mking pennit has been obtained prior to commencing desilting operation.
()
5.3.3 PROVIDB suppon for diving contractor in setting up for desilting/defouling.
NOTE Cleaning of biofouling (i.e. shells) on pump bay walls should be done immediately prior i
to scheduled desliting.
()
5.3.4 If wall etaaning has been scheduled or is required based on servey, CLEAN as follows:
()
A. CLEAN bay walls with h.. peri, hydrolasen or other suitable tooling.
()
B.
ALLOW shell and marine growth to settle to bottom of bay.
()
5.3.5 Suoervisor Natiru neinn FORWARD copy of Attachments 2 and 3 to Service Water System uneim, f
RECORD on Attachment 3.
P
()
5.3.6 PERPORM desilting operation removing silt and any material removed from bay walls.
i END OF PROCEDURE SECTION Salem Common Page 4 of 9 Rev.5 i
Sb.MD-GP.SW-0001(Q)
J 6.0 RECOltDS 6.1 Retain the following IAW NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0011(Q), Records Management Pmgram:
A"arhawat 2
7.0 REFERENCES
7.1 Commitments 7.1.1 C0297 - GL 89-13 7.2 Drawings 7.2.1 211612-A8860, Service Water Intake Arrangement, Mechanical 7.3 Cmss-Raferences 7.3.1 NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0011(Q), Record Maan.e Prepc n 3
7.3.2 NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0014(Q), Training, Qualification and Certification 1
]
7.3.3 NC.NA-AP.ZZ-0015(Q), Safety Tagging Pmgram i
i i
J 1
Salem bmmon Page 5 of 9 Rev.5
e e
Sb.WP.SW-0001(Q)
ATTACHMENT 1 SERVICE WATER BAY SECTIONAL VIEW STOP LOG GUIDE CURTAIN WALL TRAVELING SCREEN TRASH RACK 6CE BARRIER
//
</
/
/
/
s EL 100* - 0" -
EL 90*. 0"
..Um
/
x
/
\\
~
l EL 80 '- 0" -
FLOW l-6' - 0"-
N S
EL 70'- 0" -
O MAXlMUM SILT BUILD-UP LEVELS l
Salem bon Page 6 of 9 Rev.5
o sC.WP.SW-0001(Q)
ATTACHMENT 2 SERVICE WATER SILT SURVEY MAP 1
1 U
U U
U o
s PUWP SUCTIONS
~"~
~~
~
~
ABOUT EVERY FOUR FEET FROW LADDER
]_
]_
]_
]_
]-
}_
S S S S Ven"f-o
]_
]_
]_
]_
]_
]_
CURTAIN
===m-TAKC READING WHERE
^
UNE INDICATES
}
/
TRASH RACKSN I
j
\\
I
- 16 715 714
- 13
- 12
- 11
- 26 f25
- 24 (23 f22
- 21 se. Cominon Page 7 of 9 Rev.5 i
e Sb.MD-GP.SW-0001(Q)
ATTACHMENT 3 DATA SHEET I.0
.10B DATA:
Work Order No.
Activity No.
Service Water Bay No.
2.0 unVICE WATun EILT nitMOVAL DATA:
STEP DESCRIPTION DATA CALCULA'IION COMPLETED BY/DATE 5.2.5 Biofouling in. thick Inches thick
/
% Coverage X coverage equals SN coverage factor
/
4 STEP DESCRIPITON DATA ACCEPTANCE COMPLETED i
CRITERIA BY/ DATE i
/
I'
'8' SN i
5.2.5 Sat Unsat factor f
biological growth m.M Covg i
5.2.6 Y "N Sat Unsat
/
factor in w on j
5.2.7 fam silt level Sat _Unsat_
Silt level k3 ft.
/
Deallting/Defouling Permit obtained Y'#
SN 5.2.8 pennit requinxi Job scheduled Supervisor to Forward forward a copy 2 Attachments 2 and 5.3.5 and 3 Yes_No_
3 to Service Water
/
to Service Water Engineer for review SN System Engineer-and evahiatian
/
Salem Common Page 8 of 9' Rev.5
i 1 Sb.MI)-C".SW-000MG J
ATTACHMENT 3 (Cont'd) 4.0 COMPLETION NUMMARY:
t l
Comments:
j s
i i
1
-l 1
}
I i
i Individuals Performing Work.
1 3
Print Name Signature Date i
1 i
5
'Ihis pmcedure has been reviewed to ensure all seguired data and signatures brave been socorded. The procedure was completed in its eatinety unless noted in the Comenem+= Section, uniidananca Supervisor / Date Salem Common Page 9 of 9 Rev.5
INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC
$N/93 8:39:33AM ITEM NUMBER: SIT 072 NRCINSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
5/3/95 DESCRIPTION: If there is an observabic problem in the plant, should it have an EMIS tag and how does an operator know if an EMIS tag should or should not be hung.
LRSPONSOR: P.MOELLER RESPONSIBLE DEPT: LIC PS SPONSOR: W.GRAU STATUS: C CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: Answer IAW NAP-9 was provided to P. Eselgroth by W. Grau. Observable plant problems should have an EMIS tag unless it is a new problem. If.an operator observes a problem and does not see an existing EMIS tag, a tag should be written and hung.
CLOSURE DATE:
5/3/95 j
SUBMITTED DATE:
5/3/95 k
h
)
k
o,
~
f INSPECT Single Record Report - PSEG 5/2/952:49:43 PM ITEM NUMBER: SIT 051 NRCINSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH DATE 1SSUED:
5/2/95 DESCRIPTION: What is the appropriate action when a deficiency is observed and no EMIS tag is attached? At what point does the EMIS tag get pulled?
LR SPONSOR: W.GRAU RESPONSIBLE DEPT: TBD PS SPONSOR: TBD STATUS: C STATUS UPDATE: Wayne reviewing NAP - 9.
CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: An EMIS tag should be hung if one is'not observed (refer to NAP - 9, P.ll, Attached.). The EMIS tag k
is removed aAer performing the required work (See i
NAP - 9, P.21). The specific item observed (22-CCW pump) has an EMIS tag in the system (060675).
~
CLOSURE DATE:
5/2/95
~
SUBMITTED DATE:
5/2/95 l
]
i L
i 51 h
i
e 4
o
{
NC.NA-AP.22-0009(Q)
EXEIBIT 1 SAMPLE EMIS TAG / INSTRUCTIONS o
o 002999 4
d3U Y
4 1
a.~
~
G G
O omTost para sacos No.
i 002999 NMt0 DATA:
ORCLE ONE PROM EACH CoMPoH ID '
CATEGORY POR PLANT EOutPtdENT FAJLURE.S PAEMIE DETECTION ETAM ATTinst or Paa.tsnr l-CoMrmx. Room inerRuusur visO noO C,.'.*.",,","n*' ' m f=-
COM N m m h
p, c.,,,,,nn,,,,,,,,,
i E Samos buonc.en G. Componennnenne a menu
[
0%ene
=o
~~
. Loo unv LocAfio,
..m, g
,ROSLEM
SUMMARY
n i
Has tus conemon placed th. piant e a T/S Acnon tag Hypog TAq Statemenet YES C NO ]
Y O n D tocanon gEmM.
o IIIII r
III @
~m W@
e
,_, c@
FRONT BACK
.g
o
+
e C
(
NC.'NA-AP. EE-0 0 0 9 (Q)
EIHIBIT 1 (Continued) 4.
Date EMIS Tag is written.
5..
Badge No. of EMIS Tag originator.
6.
Control Rm. Instrument Yes or No.
7.
22 component Cooling Pump, etc.
8.
Component Bldg. location.
9.
Elevation / floor.
10.
I.E.,
6 ft. west of wall, etc.
11.
Failure Detection - Select category that best suits situation.
12.
Status at Time of Failure - Select category that best suits situation.
13.
Date Unit entered T/S.
i 14.
Time Unit entered T/S.
15.
T/S number.
16.
Initiator's Supervisor.
2.
Separate the top and bottom portions of the tag.
3.
Hang the top portion of the tag on or near the malfunctioning component.
Do not obscure plant indications.
If the tag is not hung on the component, indicate on the AR/WR where the tag was hung.
4.
Return the bottom portion to your Supervisor.
Nuclear Common Page 3 of 3 Rev. 7 I
a
+ - -
i INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC
%\\ \\
SM/95 8:23:18 AM geY ITEM NUMBER: SIT 056 NRCINSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
5/2/95 DESCRIPTION: How do we prioritize system windows (for on-line maintenance)?
LR SPONSOR: W.GRAU RESPONSIBLE DEPT: PLAN PS SPONSOR: W. O' BRIEN STATUS: C CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: Tracy Walker will get together with W. O' Brien to discuss this item.
CLOSURE DATE:
5/4/95 SUBMITTED DATE:
5/4/95 1
()'
Sa d
s INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC 53/93 2:31:03 PM i
ITEM NUMBER: SIT-Oll NRCINSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
4/24/95 DESCRIPTION: PROVIDE A LIST WHERE OPERATORS INTERVENED TO PREVENT AN EVENT (E.G.,
A NEAR MISS)FOR THE LAST 6 MONTHS.
LR SPONSOR: W. MCTIGUE RESPONSIBLE DEPT: OPS PS SPONSOR: V. LOWENSTEN STATUS: C CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: Approximately (3) weeks ago, the operations department began more rigorously documenting d near misses via incident reports. Several examples pr of near nusses (e.g., IR's95-130,95-275 and 95-in the list ofIR's from 2/1/95 to 4/30/95, which was provided to NRC (SIT-024).
CLOSURE DATE:
5/3/95 SUBMITTED DATE:
5/3/95 1
l i
e 3
//
1 t
J
t INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC 5/3/95 9:27:08 AM
/
ITEM NUMBER: SIT-057 NRC INSPECTOR: P. ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
5/2/95 DESCRIPTION: Provide copies of system walkdown notes /results for the following systems: 125vde,4ky, D/G's and Service Water.
LR SPONSOR: W.GRAU RESPONSIBLE DEPT: PLAN PS SPONSOR: G. MADSSEN STATUS: O 4
CLOSURE DESCRIPTION:
CLOSURE DATE:
SUBMITTED DATE:
if
,Y si y
M
i l
(
INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC OI-May-95 a.4M NUMBER: SIT-019 NRCINSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
4/27/95 DESCRIPTION: PROVIDE ALL OPERABILTY DETERMINATIONS SINCE 4/11/95. PROVIDE ON A CONTINUING BASIS UNTIL END OF INSPECTION.
LR SPONSOR: W. MCTIGUE RESPONSIBLE DEPT: OPS PS SPONSOR: V. LOWENSTEN STATUS: C CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: Provided operability determinations since 4/11 and
(
will be provided daily in the future.
CLOSURE DATE:
5/1/95 SUBMITED DATE:
5/1/95 L
e
,9 Y
(
INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC OI-May-93 ITEM NUMBER: SIT 022 l
NRCINSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
4/27/95 DESCRIPTION: PROVIDE A COPY OF THE TS l
INTERPRETATIONS.
LR SPONSOR: W.GRAU i
l RESPONSIBLE DEPT: OPS PS SPONSOR: V. LOWENSTEN STATUS: C CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: Copy of the Tech Spec interpretations were provided to the NRC.
CLOSURE DATE:
4/28/95 l
SUBMITED DATE:
4/28/95 l
i l
n
INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC 5/2/95 4:21:24 PM i
ITEM NUMBER: SIT-023 NRCINSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
4/27/95 DESCRIPTION: WHAT ACTIONSHAVEBEENTAKENINTHE LAST MONTH TOIMPROVE SYSTEM ENGINEERING SUPPORT OF SYSTEM RELIABILITY. ALSO WHATIS THE DEGREE OF INVOVLEMENT BY SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.
LR SPONSOR: K. DZIUBELA l
RESPONSIBLE DEPT: TECH l
PS SPONSOR: J. RAN j
STATUS: C CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: Interview was held on 5/2 with J Ranalli, G.
Madsen and Eselgroth.
CLOSURE DATE:
5/2/95 SUBMITTED DATE:
5/2/95 4
J q!
i
i INSPECT Single Record Report 01-May-93 ITEM NUMBER: SIT-016 i
NRCINSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH j
DATE ISSUED:
4/27/95 DESCRIPTION: Provide a list of all ad-hoc tcans for near term improvement, with points of contact.
LR SPONSOR: K. DZIUBELA RESPONSIBLE DEPT: VAR PS SPONSOR: VAR STATUS: C CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: All ad hoc plans have been incorporated into the IMPACT Plan. Confirmed with R. Brown CLOSURE DATE:
5/1/95 SUBMITED DATE:
5/1/95 1
16 A
y
INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC 3/12"25 9:06:55 AM r
ITEM NUMBER: SIT 123 NRC INSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
5/11/95 DESCRIPTION: Reliability Services (Nichols)1.as corrective maintenance trend graphs by system / component.
The data supporting the graphs has been available for some time (i.e., MMIS). It appears to tim NRC team that these data have not been used (i.e.,
integrated into the work prioritization process) by station management to date. This was apparent from inteniews/ questions about performance indicators, during which no managers referred to the data. How does station management respond to this observation?
LRSPONSOR: W.MCTIGUE RESPONSIBLE DEPT: VAR PS SPONSOR: VARIOUS STATUS: C CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: Morroni met with P. Eselgroth resiewed and provided copies of PI reports on 5/11. This item is closed per P. Esclgroth. Appropriate inteniews have been conducted to obtain tic required information.
CLOSURE DATE:
5/12/95 SUBMITTED DATE:
5/12/95 123
\\
INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC 3/1095 5:13:26 PM ITEM NUMBER: SIT il7 NRC INSPECTOR: P. ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
5/9/95 DESCRIPTION: Please provide training handouts used at NTC relative to the April 7 event and the Turbine Generator failure.
LR SPONSOR: P. MOELLER RESPONSIBLE DEPT: NTC PS SPONSOR: A.ORTICELLE STATUS: C I
CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: Lesson Plans 305S-000.005-UNITIE-00 (April 7 event) and 300S-000.00S-EHCONT-07 (includes Turbine Overspeed event) were provided to NRC.
CLOSURE DATE:
5/10/95 SUBMITTED DATE:
5/10/95 t
i
INSPECT Single Record Report - NRC 5/10/95 6:27:36 PM ITEM NUMBER: SIT 120 NRCINSPECTOR: P.ESELGROTH DATE ISSUED:
5/10/95 DESCRIPTION: Is there a program in place to review the Bills of Material and correct discrepancies, other than fixing them on a case-by-case basis?
LR SPONSOR: W.MCTIGUE RESPONSIBLE DEPT: NE PS SPONSOR: SANTONASTASO STATUS: O CLOSURE DESCRIPTION: Project desenption of Purchase Class 4 [i.e., items procured without QA provisions) - classification validation effort was provided to NRC. Imu Santonastaso x1909 is a contact for followup.
CLOSURE DATE:
SUBMITTED DATE:
4 4
d 120
fferns f rocared w; & { G /f lYo hie *6
[.WAP-19 H./0 PROJECT TITLE:
M4IS PURCHABE CLASS "4" CLASS CODES -
CLASSIFICATION VALIDATION TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PURPOSE:
In August 1994, the NRC questioned the procurement classification i
of a rheostat used in the IE battery chargers at the Salem plant.
A follow up investigation determined that the rheostat was improperly classified for the associated application. Subsequently, a Bill of Material (BOM) validation effort was initiated and completed by PSE&G employees in November 1994.
This project is a continuation of that validation effort.
This project is necessary to assure that an acceptable level of accuracy exists concerning i
the BOM's in MMIS.
i l
SCOPE:
The successful bidder will, from the list of class codes provided, 4
- 1) Retrieve the Procurement Classification records for each class code from microfilm.
This will entail the use of Aquarius (Stairs)
{
to obtain the microfilm reel and frame number where the microfilm can be found.
2)
Review the procurement classification obtained during Step 1, and determine if the classification is acceptable by the 1
definitions used today.
This will require an understanding of the history of the forms used by PSE&G and an understanding of the current procurement methods utilized by the Nuclear Industry. If the procurement classification does not exist on microfilm or the classification that was found must be revised, then a classification will be developed utilizing the forms and I
i methodologies currently in use by PSE&G's Procurement Engineering Group (reference NC.DE-AP.ZZ-0016 (O) ).
All work associated with this project will be reviewed by the PSE&G Procurement Engineering Group.
At the option of the QA Planning for Procurement Group, all packages reviewed or developed by this ' project will be reviewed by the Quality Assurance organization.
The resolution of any questions either by the Procurement Engineering Group or the QA i
l Planning for Procurement Group is the responsibility of the i
successful bidder.
i
/
6 x-
i 4**,
To perform this scope of work, the current MMIS database of BOM's, the Aquarius database, and the Component ID database must be utilized.
There will be a minimum of 400 and a maximum of 653 class codes that must have their Procurement Classification Justifications reviewed or developed.
{
WORK TO BE PEREDRMED BY PSEGG:
1 PSE&G will provide a listing on hard copy, as well as a dBase III i
file, if requested, detailing all the class codes that need to be reviewed.
PSE&G will review and sign off on all packages developed as part of this task.
Guidance will be provided in the usage of all the databases discussed and the history of Procurement at the i
Nuclear Business Unit. PSE&G will initiate any Problem Reports or Deficiency Reports required as part of the outcome of this project.
f DOCUME!!T SUBMITTAL:
The successful bidder of this project will provide to PSE&G a completed cover sheet with sign off for each class code (an example of a previous cover sheet as well as completed packages from the previous project are attache'd).
If a Procurement Classification j
justification is developed, the classification will be signed by i
the successful bidder, PEER reviewed by PSE&G, and attached to the cover sheet. The purpose of the cover sheet is to document that a i
review has been performed of each class code..This package will i
then be submitted for microfilming, l
A bi-weekly status report shall be provided to the PSE&G Project Manager and will include as a minimum:
j A list of the class codes completed.
Project implementation problem identification and resolution.
s Project meetings:
Bi-weekly project meetings'shall be conducted as requested by the PSE&G Project Manager.
SCHEDUII:
All work is to be completed by June 30, 1995.
i 6
The key Salem safety review / oversight personnel are highlighted i
on the attached, j
John Summers (Station GM) is SORC Chairman.
Jeff Benjamin (Director-QA/NSR) is Nuclear Review Board (NRB)
Chairman.
Bruce Hall (Manager - Nuclear Safety Review) is responsible for:
Offsite Safety Review (OSR) - Carolyn Taylor is Salem's OSR supervisor.
i Safety Review Group (SRG), aka Onsite Safety Review - Fernando Ricart is Salem's Onsite Safety Revievi Engineer.
h i
l l
J s
]
f 4
l 4
6
-w-
(
Focus info for inspecting to our Team Charter Given all that Salem has on their plate - in terms of past problem corrective actions /new initiatives / plans to do better -
WHAT CAN WE SAY ABOUT HOW THEY'RE PRESENTLY-DECIDING WHAT TO DO IN WHAT ORDER HOW THEY'RE DOING A'T IT HOW THEY'RE DEALING WITH DAILY EMERGENT i
ISSUES Since the April 1st time frame, WHAT ACTIONS HAVE THEY TAKEN TO IMPROVE THINGS (some of these may i
have measureable results, others may be steps they took to do something in a better way and they don't have negative results i
that disprove it, but they took the step)
In all that's going on at Salem, WHAT DO YOU SEE in your area of responsibility, for which you have data / info indicating that SALEM MAY BE MISSING, OR NOT DEALING WITH EFFECTIVELY.
1
' G
l W
l l
INTERVIEW SCHEDULE NAME SYSTEM DATE TIME INTERVIEWER I
Dom Shea SEC's 5/1 1500 Pete Eselgroth 2
Bob Swartzwelder Circulators 5/2 1000 3
Steve Robitski Feedwater Heaters 5/2 1500 4
John Wiedemann Boric Acid Xfer Pump 5/3 1500 5
Mike Mortarulo Station PNeEYfYrmers 5/4 1000 6
Mike Mealey &
Heater Drain Pumps &
5/4 1400 Matt Orticelle MSR drain tank level control i
All interviews will be in the Operations Conference Room (ext. 2660) unless otherwise noted.
May 1,1995 (1:43pm)
I FWG T
SALEM SIT ONSITE TEAM SCHEDULE yjy e
Day W
T F
M T
W T
F M
T W
T F
M T
W T
F ate 2
1 2
3 4
5 8
9 1
1 1
1 3
g 3
g O
1 2
5 6
7 8
9 I
Greg X
X y y(
g K
y g g y g g Tracy
)(
X Ef! rp; K 7"g g
gg steve ys K X X X X X
X X X
Michele X
X X KK K
K 7 g g j
u Peter
/ j y
y y
y y
$j 3 r Ad*[
Sd
~ cc f _
k.
/
%l 8ALBM 8TATION MBETING j/ h Purnome Groun 2133 Freo.
Location j
Sr. Supr. 6:30am Daily Lobby Conf.Ra. Review equip.OO8 1:00pm.
' Daily Lobby Conf.Ra. scheduled work, 6:30pm Daily Cont.Rm. Area Tech. Spec. Action (redd Statements, ops.
1 j
priority work, Ops. concerns Ngre.
8:00am Daily Admin. Cont.Rm. Ngat. Issues Engineers 8:30am Daily Lobby cont.Rm. Plant Status, Incident Reports, Isnues 80RC 1:30pm -
Wed Admin. Conf.Rm. 80RC items 3:30pm 4
RNSS 6-Bam Daily SN88 Office Turnover 6-8pm Controla 7:30am M,W,F Controls Shop 8tandup atg.on issues 12-2pm Th(5/4)
Processing Ctr. Focus utg.
Chem.
7:00am Daily Chem. Shop Morning utg.
7:15am Daily Chem. Shop 8r. Supv. for days activities 12:30pm Thur Chem. Shop Focus utg.
RP 7:30am Daily RP.krea Morning utg.
i 12:30pm Daily RP Area Sr. Supr. for days activities 12:00pm Thur RP Area Focus utg.
Planning 11:00am Daily Plan.Mgr. Office Daily update I
12:15pm Wed Admin. Conf.Rm.
Hgr. direct rpt.
Thur
~~------
Focus utg.
Outage 11:00am 5/1/95 l
Team B Bldg. conf.Rm. Elect.Dist. HIT 10:00am 5/3/95 B Bldg. cont.Ra. 8tm. Generator HIT Team j
9:30am
$/11/95 8 Bldg. conf.Rm. EDG HIT Team 1L:30am 5/18/95 Lobby Conf.Rm.
Pre-outage Mtg.
Technical 9: 00am Daily Tech. Dept. Area Plant Status i
11:00am Tues Mgr. Office Direct Reports f
10:00am Thur Mgr. Office Direct Reports 12:30pm Thur v
Tech. Dept. Area Focus Meg. (IP NBCB88ARY) i g
.g nist assi se te ewisusot, eis us,es w m
...awa...
t 4
Mech.Maint.7 30am M,W,F Maint. Shop Standup Meg. on various issues 12:15pm Wed B Bldg. cont.Rm.Mgr. Direct Rpts.
1.0 : 00am Thur Lot.cy Conf.Rm. Supv.Staf f Meg.
10:30am
.M,Tu,W,F Sr.8upv. Area Sr.8upv./Supv.Mtg.
NR8 Morning 4/26/95 Salem Plant Tours Afternoon 4/26/95 Exec. conf.Rs.
Discussions All Day 4/27/95_
Exec. citf.Rm.
Discussions
% Sku c.j p, T6 2 2-) (y 5,p fd g_
l i
I I
1 i
.j I
i t
- d StsGt G66t*GE*te 9N15H3317 U15 W31US Woud
g
${ggy:
4-24-85 :12:40PM :
PSE&G LIC & REG-610 337 5324:* 2/ 3 i
O PSEG Pubbc Service Electric and Gas Cornpany P.O Box 236 Hancocks Bndge, New Jersey 08038-0236 Nuclear Business Unit
+
TO:
All QA/NSR Ass ciates FROM:
in D
/NSR
SUBJECT:
OA/NSR REORGANIZATION OUR REF:
NOS95-051 DATE:
March 31,1995 4
A 10CFR50.59 safety evaluation for the reorganization of OA functions in our uopartenent has been approved by SORC at Salem and Hope Creek. Revisions to the procedures for implementation of cur structure will be completed to support an effective date of April 10,1995, An additional organizational change to improve efficiency of operations has been adopted. The Procurement Assessment group will merge into the Corrective Action and QA Programs group and will be known as Corrective Action and Ouality Services.
Attached are organization charts showing individual assignments. Postings for open positions commenced March 29,1995. If you have any questions regerding these assignments, please discuss them with your (new) rnanager. If ofter that discussion, you still have questions, please brin 0 them to my attention, individually or at the next department meeting.
With your support and our working as a team, we will use this new structure to significantly increase our effectiveness as an independent assessment organization and increase our value to the Nuclear Business Unit.
l l
Attachments wno AT4940ss r,si.ve L
O, DIRECT
- QA/NSR
<p 13 FUNCTIONAL ORGANIZATION CHART MANAGER MANAGER -
MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER QUALITY ASSESSMENT OUALITY ASSESSMENT
. CORRECTIVE ACTION EMPLOYEE HUCLEAR SAFETY SALEM HOFE CREEK
& QUALITY SERVICES CONCERNS REVtEW.
[
I P4nt Assessment Plant Assessr tent Sucofier Assessme_nt forreceive Action
- Process Employee Safety Review Groto Concerns Function
- Operations Operations Supplier Evaluatics-
- Adrninister the
- Maintenance
- Maintenance Corrective Action
- Conduct or coordinate
- Independent Review I
a Techrwcal
- TechAical SWAOS Listing Program knrestigations of of selected plant
- Rad Pro / Chemistry
- Rad Pro / Chemistry aWegations cpris. characteristics.
r
- P/ Schedule
- Fuel Procurement
- Trend Analysis &
NRC lssuances.
I Plant Sueoort Speciatest Reporting
- Provide trairvno tc irdust. advis.. f acility 2
Plant Sucoort Assessments site supervisors f eatures, equip.
c',
Asses sments
- 10CFR21 Interf ace
- Perfo<mance
- Surv. of Plant vi Nucleas Engg.
Assessment Opn!Maint.
C i
8 Nuclear Engg.
- Ucensing &
- Advise Ugmt. of
'.?
- Licensing &
ReDulation OA Proarems overall Quality! Safety g
l Regulaticn
- Traiturso Materist Corneliance of operations &
Q
- Trainirg
- OEF & Corrective Maintam NBU Quality recommend
- OEF & CA Action
- Material Evaluaticn Assurance Programs irnprovements
- Erwiton Srves, & EP
- Site Support and Dedicatten
- Site Support
- FP, Security, Access
- OA Trairvng &
Offsite Safety Review Materials Mgmt.
Control
- Procurement Certefication e
to Assessments:
h[
- Nuclear Review Board Onality Venfication Ou3 ity verificatityn
- Classelication.
- Admienstratnre &
Support Purchasing, Storage, Financial Services Staff Support for C
- Independent
- Independent HandNng Nuclear Cornmittee of
=
inspection Inspecticn
- Administer the
!!ie Board f
- Wetding/ Code
- Welding / Code Nuclear Repair
- Specialized Assmts h
activities activities Program i.e. SSFR s
3 Modification &
S Modification &
- Independent Review Construction Construction
- Coordinate CMAP &
- Safety evaluation.
Verificatsn Verification Tech Specialist for USO verificatsen
- Materiel Corvfition
- Materiel Condit on Exchange
- Tech Spec Changes i
Monitoring Monitcring
- Opn Lic. Chngs O
s Rad /HA2 MAT
- Rad /HAZMAT
- P.ecords Retection Violations Menitoring Montoring
.'tepertable Everts 8
^
- Doc,7tecords e Doc! accords
- SORC minutes
'8 Assessment Assessment
- Signif. anomalies g
- Tech Spec Rev/
rd l
Audits g
- Lic. Event Reports y
s i
f.3 WSO A T An ASSESS.wP I
e e
+
fA.
1 A
- k.. '
3/22M5 NUCLEAR BUSINESS UNIT QAINSR N
-}
i C PJCTC84 C"JALITY ASSU8UWCEJ U
- AJCLEAR SAFETV RTVETT g
J A BE8834MN
-M b-g L.
D HADOEta
- i..
._.._._._I
. _. ~ _.. _ _.. 1 F
g l
6 b.-
..l I
- l. __..
h ELMAC13t o
"#EN STCIAL PROJttTg MAMACER if A>lLGE3t CCARECUtf ACTICH &
pgg WN AA WI" "
A CtAPCt%O WALITY At&EssWENT CaJAlttY AtSEssentfff cuAUn StavlCES EMM.OTIY CONCERM5 8 "#E
- o. nsaRTampr)
FWWE CpfEN)
(1ALEte)
- J WORR150N J D CAMEY D FREEMAN 1 - Om 0 YAUSER 5 j
_ao.
. _J
-275 aft.
_. v,t _.
k g
W E
g Sk rn N]m.
g Soc ^
g t
{
-i 3
~
c~ \\tk g -
ai
),
r y
.e M
Ja W*04tA33182
'N O
um.
v w
y-
15~-
ar2ms QA/NSR "s
E QUALITY ASSESSMENT (SALEM)
MAMAGER-C4JA1JTY ASSESSLIENT(SALEM)
D. TAUBER q -
SENICR SECRETARY PGNEERM ASSISTAW h
CWCAL MCM C. SthedERMON C. HUTCHttISON t
d I
2 PLANT ASSESSMENT PLANT SUPPORT ASSESSMENT 1 CPEN OOAUTY VERIFICATION i
1-OPEN hk V'{
l (y
1 - OPEN*
I A
c n
b ASSOC ATEfSENfCR ASSOCIATEfSEF3CM M
ASSOCIATEsSENOR ENGisiEER
)
STAFF EP4GNEER L *M - C. BERSAK-CFERATONS STAFF ENGPfEER 1
C. OCMANOSKY-NUCLEAR ENGG. DESIGH fd W P. CUSICK.TECHNr.AL R.BJECHLER
.J O'NEILL-4SkNDE/ SITE SERVICES ged > X. GOEBEL-OPERATON S L DEANS A. SIEBERT-EPIENMRotWEtITAL SERMCES 1 FISHER fy TAwrJ. EGGENHOFFER-MAINT4!ECH & PLWittihG R. TRtJHAV-NUCLEAR TRAINING m
J. FRANKS S. FAUL#4ER-MAltri-MECHANICAL
& M WITAFIRE PRO /SECURITYiMATEP.tLS MGMT.
e 4k%LOHY it. CISBS MAIPTT CCNTROLS S WARD-OEF 4 COR*ECTINE ACT;ON E
y R. ROS NSGN j
A M GROSS-TECHNICAL w,F.YEICH-NUC. ENCC.-PROJ & PROGR AMS. L AR C. RUAttE
'd
!= S. HOOKS-MAINT-CCHTROLSaPt/tif!!NG y E.LAWREPICE-RAD FftOfCHEMSTRY C. 'MLLIAMS g,
at J WILLOUGHBY-OPERATICHS L.
O
'S Skath.aitiern Segemsce R'
t vrDATAE91AF2 O
~
to,,
mms QAINSR a..
-QUAllTY ASSESSMENT (HOPE CREEK) y MANAGER-QUAtJTY ASSESSMDIT
{ HOPE CREEK)
.1 - OPEN e
~~W SENIOR SECRETARY K VCLGARttM3 ENGINEERING RECORDS a
CLERK h')
M. mC WATTERS T
US IO E
-2 PLANT ASSESSMENT 1 - OPEN Pt. ANT SUPPORT ASSESSMENT f CE FEBO CUAUTY VERIFICATION 1.CPEN i
to g
cn
--t tes AS$CCFATEiSENICR EWNEM ASSOCIATE /SENe0R M WRO TECHNM STAFF ENGINEER STAFF ENGINEER J. KEFLEY-CHEMISTRY-RAD FMO R. BRtGGS-ISIAVELDfNG/ SITE $UPPORT T. HER N M. WARADEO-MAINTE' LANCE 44ECHANX:AL"*
S. HILDfTCH-NE PROJECTS A PROGRAMS, LaR E MALONEY**
R. MYERS-OPERATIONS R. MERENDINO-HUCLEAR ENGG (NE)
R. RU52XOWSA1 O
A.SCNETTihoC9 ERAT 10NS/ TECHNICAL M FEMAWWNOCMTC
- q. g;ogingg C
- 3. SKASICFT-MAINTEMNICE44ECHAtaCAL*"
R. SAVAGE-FIRE PROISECURtTYlACCESS gum O
E. RUSH-M4NTENANCE RC
-. G.WCHLER-OEF & CORRECT 1W ACTION o von 03vega O
W. GOTT-Or' ERAT 10NSe
'a.
- PENDING COMPLEilON OF SALEM ASSIGNMENT
" ACliNG GRotJP HEAD W DATA'23DF2
- "WCLUDES ASSES $ MENT OF PtN*NWG AtID 3CHEDULE g
i.
~.
l o
t l
- v. t l
T'
-1 l
w QAINSR CORRECTIVE ACTION AND QUALITY SERVICES t
v MAMAOCR-h CC#UtEC?nY ACMom ANDCLiatJfY s
5E.RYlCES
]
W J. 90RR:5Cas i~.
mn
..l n
{
.._. j stNicMg spcstergtgy k
M CALLE k-.
. I M
J PelpeCF AL f*dC3ER
- 4 PRF8CIP88. EnGaNEER FalwC! PAL DeGWFER fJ SLPERYt3s4 EPeCNEER D
qQA PeOGfRAM5B CORRECTfvt ACTEte S.OPOe Sttruf R A11E5.5 MENT
/
l MAN g
7 t. OP!M R CJtFFsin C0eIPLiMcCE) p s
e._
{
t CPEre
.-- - I O
._--. 3 - -
g t _..
g r
i r.... i... _
r, 4340CtATT>1De3t A15CCLttE/1Elacet COCE A.2St;P#eCg ASSCCIA t t/sE Nr.dt STAM t% CHEER
)
SinF D#0MER t#tetMIST STAFF EPsGM ER P1tJeC1 PAL STAFF 04
- AEM D tEktw G BARNis A T POGERrS MLOWE~
y STAFF tNGMER C FEMTOH F (McCHWAu
+,
94 P43rtTER
- pwmg T DMtGMT s CtArsE.
W 8L.A2f t
- CP't3 g
R GAL 10VrAf ssaccx g
- e. mn
(-
J W4tt/CE
.t erNTers g
E JaaesscM w peju
. j R.*.attET C
.., - - -]
R sitrNW12 o,..L.,-
,C 1
j s too e
[
w =c =w f,
w e czass c,
G PMEtPS
-.--.g o
i 4cwtNt1T14.AT?A Ct.'Jg acwlN$ 7AAf r4 CLIAM c
P Howar1R eCPUI ADAerNt3 ? RAT'.I M
CATA 2NTRf CtERM g
..- ~
..I CLERK C.TOtLEY im <EmvcAd
,x.,,n
.C r.c y o.;P,.t.n a ct3ntus
=.
.m.
kh4 a.
3/z u95 QA/L.<
EMPLOYEE CONCERNS
=
~<.
M ANAGER -
EVPLOYEE CONCERN 5 J. CAREY
-226-
- e..
. _ __ L z
- 5'
'4 '
ENPLOYEE CONCERNS EMPLOYEE CONCERNS INVESTIGATOR
,. INVEST 1CATOR 1-OPEN tOPEN m -
m t
. i c
n b
lm
' 6$
e' o
u
[
e<
is ce N
O WfDATAt14.1 AF2
. ~,
m.
,. ~...
,,. ~,
.n.
3.
.y3,n,.
...,ei
,._..m..,
.,,m_.
y
-... ~.
,s. s.
5 i
a NUCLEAR SAFETY REVIEW w
MANACER.
MJCLEAR SAFETY REVEW B. HALL
-143--
SENIOR SECRE'TARY T. COOK Y
h)
~. -
As h
a.
CNSITE SMETY REVIEW ONSITE SAFETY REVIEW h
ENGINEER q ALEM)
CFFstTE SMETY RE%1EYJ ENGlWEER (HOPE CREEfQ 1 CPEN ENGINEER c,pocogo A. TAYLCR
$ECRETARY K HILL r
T. PR000 n
b O. PEASE R METZINGER C.SUCKLEY 14 PEN P. CRA10 S. FOGELSOM K MOCftE A. HAsijA F. R CART
- E. ROZOVSKY m
S. SVITH 5
V. SOLNiKB r.a J HOOSON O
8 if SE WOATMt43 AF2 to e-
_ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. ~.. - _ _ _ _ _. _. _ _. _ _.
'-}
t I(
SYSTEM ENGINEERING ASSIGNMENTS APRIL 24,1995 i
Sortedb S stem f
m.
...,~.
,.s,
. i.,
' ' ~
~
i
'I;7*ts.,<4 M.
f llSV AC Synous h0Ck11,1DU MCLAUGHUN, ROB 2757 E12CT 12SV DC Syesem MICEU,IDU MCLAUONUN, ROB 2757 EIECT l
13KV AC Symma BHATIA, VUAY MORAKINYO, PAUL 2117 EIECT 240/200 AC Syemas CHRANOWSKI, RAY FOCHT, BRUCE 204$
ELECT.
20V DC Symsme neCEU,1DU MCIAUOHUN, ROB 2757 EIECT l
400V AC Syemas CHRANOWSKI, RAY POCHT, BRUCE 2045 EIECT j
4KV AC Symmes CHRANOWSKI, RAY POCHT, BRUCE 2045 E12CT
{
$00 KV AC Symma BHA 11A, VUAY MORAKINYO, PAUL 2117 E12CT.
ADPCS(6 aalimedmeesr)
IDWRY, Bill PEHUSH, JOHN 2066 14C
[
{
S i
AMIMS ORIMM, JIM 2096 l&C i
1 AMSAC JANNETTY, SANDY 2074 IAC i
l ARPI SHEA,DOMINIC MAI, KIM 2C78 IAC Aaso Simp Oil ORTICEUI, MATT KOLABINSKI, DAVE 2084 BOP Ams. Ann JANNETTY,8ANDY 2074 IAC Anz. BMs Swuseme ANNETT, JIM 27 %
BOP l
Aux. Diesels KOLABINSKI, DAVE RODOERS, Bill 205$
BOP i
Aum. Fasessaar Unit i ERHARD, JOHN 2752 NSSS Amt Feedesser Unit 2 ROBERTS,P1DANN 2006 NSSS i.
BETA /Asumannssars IDWRY, BILL 2066 IAC i
Ihstahls Treadm8 PANKO, MIKE PEHUSH, JOHN 2192 IAC 4
Bised Sisee(up to hasser shaus)
RUDOtJH, STEVE ORTICEU2, MATT 2726 BOP Beric AsidTransfer CHOROMANSKI, WAYNE 2077 NSSS Been Removery ROBERTS, FIDANN 2086 NSSS l
bur 6 H2 & C02 OR11CEL12, MATT KOLABINSK1, DAVE 2004 BOP Cask Crams FORD, USA A11AUOH, MIKE 20$1 RX. ENO.
i /
Calhads Pnessinam CHRANOWSKI, RAY POClfr BRUCE 2045
- E12CT, j (
Chasmael Feed Unit i AMBROSINO, MIKE 2133 NSSS I
Ommunal Feed Unit 2 CURHAM, JACK 2751 NSSS e
i Chilled Weser Unit i PAHWA.OU12HAN 2092 NSSS l
l Chilled Weser Usut 2 CHOROMANSKI, WAYNE 2077 NSSS Circ. Weser SWARTZWEIDER, BOB &
2M0&
[
j Cuc. Weser Bailer SWARTZWEIDER, BOB &
2760 &
a j
Circ. Weser Senaawe ANNETT, JIM 27M BCP Cire, Waner Vmaalstaan SWARTZWEIDER, BOB &
2MO&
Casupanse Cashes Unit i ERHARD, JOHN 2752 NSSS i
I Campamma Ceehus Unit 2 ROBERTE,FIDANN 2006 NSSS Compuessa Plantliaissa 1DWRY, BILL 2066 I&C i
comesummes ROBITZSKI, STEVE mal 2Y, MICHAEL 2081 BOP i
3 Candmunes PohslunS nit i AMBROSINO, MIKE 2133 NSSE U
CamdummesPalmiunS nit 2 CURHAM, JACK 2751 NSSS U
4 Camdumar Air Itammwel & Prumag SWARTZWEIDER, BOB &
2MO&
BOP j
OARCIA, ART 2M3 l
Condemar Vesume SWARTZWE1 DER BOB &
2M0&
BOP f
OARCIA, ART 2M3 l
Camdumme SWARTZWEIDER, BOB &
2MO&
BOP i
1 OARCIA ART 2M3 r-Bids euseme ANNETT, JIM OR11CEU2, MATT 27M BOP S
}
Canammeuss sprey Unit !
CHEN,OORDEN 2754 NSSS i
e-Sprey Unit 2 12MBERGER, BOB 2043 NSSS 1
ch Drums Unit i TIMM CARL 2M2 NSSS ch Drains Unit 2 HOEO, TIM 2042 NSSS i'
Cearel Air anntwee Bg1 rnr astNSK1, DAVE 2MO BOP i
Casal Romelaanummes SHEA,DOMDGC MAI, KIM 2078 IAC Case Esin Thannessuple Syman FORD, USA AIJAUGH, MIKE 2051 RX. ENO.
l Cranes ANNETT, JIM ORTICELII, MATT 27 %
BOP CVCS.Umis 1 T1MM, CARL 2M2 NSSS j
CVCS. Unit 2 HOEO, TIM 2042 NSSS CyboderMasamt issa ORTICEL12, MATT KOIASINSKI DAVE 2084 BOP
~
S d
Dunst Fuel Oil KOLASINSKI, DAVE RODGERS, Bill 205$
BOP I
i 0
l t
i
- g.
.m o
o :,,, s
(-
,,,,i
,<s Rasamenes Tsumans MAI, KIM SHEA, DOMINIC 2008 lac i
Ellis PANKO MIKE STARINO, KEN 21P2 IAC i
RVUS JANNE1TY, SANDY IDWRY, Bill 2074 IAC SEC SHEA, DOMDGC MAI, KIM 2078 IAC 1
Sammedwy Lab Unit i AMBROSINO, MIKE 2133 NSSS I
Samendwy tah Unit 2 CURHAM, JACK 2731 NSSS Sesondwy $saphnSUnit i AMBROSINO, MIKE 2133 NSSS Sasandmy SamylanSUnit 2 CURHAM, JACK 275I NSSS j
Samway Power Spinens MCIAUONUN, ROB MICEU, LOU 2758 E12CT Samumme kunnummes ORIMM, RM 2096 l&C Servise Weser BARNES, RM ZABIELAKI, VINCE 2067 BOP j
$srvice Weesr basiis serwame BARNES,RM ZABIELIKI,VINCE 2067 BOP 1
Servios Weser Vasilmaien BARNES, JIM ZABIE!IKI VINCE 2067 BOP j
SOFF Casand-DCP (Elec)
JANNETTY,8ANDY 1DWRY, Bill 2074 IAC j
SOFF 1mbs Oil ROBITZSKI, STEVE MA12Y, MICHAEL 2081 BOP SOFP Twtues (includmeS Sessar Supply)
ROBITZSKI, STEVE MAIIY, MICHAEL 2081 BOP 3
Seismeed Vaivas POCHT, BRUCE 2000 E1ICT SPDS Power Symon MCIAUGHUN, ROB MICEU.1DU 2758 E!ICT SPDS IDWRY, BILL 2066 1&C Spes Past Caelms Unit i ERHARD, JOHN 2752 NSSS Spent Pasi CanimeSUsus 2 ROBERTS, FIDANN 2086 NSES Spent Fusi Pool PORD, USA 20$1 RX. EFG.
SSPS/staba Panel STARING, KEN PANKO. MIKE 2157 IAC Sistian Air /Servise Air RODOERS. Bill KOLASINSK!, DAVE 2%0 BOP j
stessa Flow Pressaarrrendias MA!, KIM SHEA, DOMDGC 2005 IAC Sessen Osmesser Blowdown ROBfTZSKL STEVE MAIIY, MICHAEL 2081 BOP Sasern Omanusers Unit i AMBROSINO, MIKE 2133 NSSS Sesem Osnareams Unit 2 CURHAM, JACK 2751 NSSS i
ch -tMarSin Mesusar IORD, USA A!. FAUGH, MIKE 20$1 RX. ENO.
Trumment I==eng (Civil)
ANNETT, JIM ORTICEME, MATT 27 %
BOP TEC Pomer symmes Omarmaer MICEU 1DU MCIAUGHUN. ROB 2757 ELICT.
i Twtame AmmiliaryConhasSyseen ORTICELII, MATT KOLASINSKI, DAVE 2084 BOP
[
TwbmeBidt trusewe ANNETT, JIM ORTICEUI, MATT 27 %
BOP S
- (
Twtime Dreams MAIIY, MICHAEL ROBITZSKI, STEVE 2721 BOP Unit 3(Elmenom!)
BHA 11A,VUAY MORAKINYO, PAUL 2117 E12CT Unit 3 Tw6ine WI)
KOLASINSKI, DAVE RODOERS. BILL 20$$
BOP Wesse Dupamel (Onn, Upid, Solid) Unit i 11MM, CARL 2762 NSSS 1
Wasas Dupasal (Oss, Upid, Solid) Unit 2 HOEO, TIM 2042 NSSS Weaa$ Doors ANNETT, JIM ORTICEUI, MATT 2756 BOP Yard Transfonners MORAKINYO, PAUL BHATIA, VUAY 2030 EIICT Comnonent Enrineerine Groun l
SYSTEM ENGINEER..
EXT.
i DESCRIPTION / FUNCTIONAL AREA I
1&C CROUCH, CLAYTON 2175 Mechamcal CONROY, MATT 7697 Mechamcal DAVIES, STEVE 2089 i
1&C LAUGHMAN, DAN 2759 Electncal DIGIROLAMO, CHARLIE 2064 Electncal/MOV GALIhGLY, STEVE 2797 Mechanical RHODA, JOHN 2095 e
d i /
r 3
~
Salem SIT Open Questions 3/lW951:10:16PM ITEM DATE RESP PSEGSPONSOR NRCINSPECTOR STATUS UPDATE MUMBER ISSUED DEPT LR SPONSOR DESCRIPTION SIT-003 4/26/95 OPS B. O' GRADY P. ESELGROTH W.GRAU FOR SIT-002 PROVIDE SOMETHING THAT B. O' Grady addressing - he has copy of SIT-002.
DESCRIBES T11E SIGNIFICANCE OFDIE Forecast complete 5/10/95.
SIT-002 DATA.
SIT-025 4/27/95 OPS B. C/ GRADY P. ESELGROUI W.MCTIGUE PROVIDEINFORMATION REGARDING B. O' Grady to supply answer. Forecast complete 5/10/95.
REDUCT10NS IN UNPIANNED ENTRY INTOTECHNICAL SPECIFICATION ACTION STATEMENTS, TAGGING PROBLEMS /MISPOSITION.
SIT-090 5/8/95 QA D. TAUBER P. ESELGROTH R. MALONE is there a program at Salem for imprming R. Malone resiewing with station points-of-contact and procedural adherence? If so, prmide a copy of SQA. Forecast reply by 5/10/95.
.:.._..._..:2: ion.
SIT-093 5/8/95 VAR VARIOUS P. ESELGROTH W. MCTIGUE Does Station management hav: a basis for Requested key station points-of contact to reply by 5/9 am.
concluding that procedure use and adherence over the past 3 months has improved, declined or remained the same?
SIT-101 5/8/95 OPS B. O'GRADY P. ESELGROTH W. MCTIGUE, p.3 of the IMPACT plan states With B. O'Grady for action Forecast response by 5/10/95.
that " ease of operations has been facilitated by reducing operator workarounds, administrative burdens and other unnecessary disersions.
What actions have been taken?
a
~
. ITEM DATE RESP
. PSEG SPONSOR NRCINSFECTOR STATUS UPDATE MUMBER ISSUED DEPT LR SPONSOR DESCRIPTION
. SIT-105 5/8/95 OPS B. O'GRADY P. ESELGRCf!11 l
W. MCTIGUE, p. 4 of the IMPACT plan says With B. O'Grady for acten. Request reply by $/10/95.
that " actions were defined to allow Salem to i
implement many of Hope Creek's work control processes and to assure proper control of tagging." What are these actions?
SIT-109 5/8/95 1ECH T. SPENCER G. GALLETTI W. MCTIGUE For IR 95-518 (PR 0095050388), which was Operability determination / system engineer memo assigned significance lewt 2, provide the provided 5/10; Metigue to provide follow-up by 5/10 pm..
evalusten by the Techmcal department. '
' SIT-110
'5/8/95 PLAN W. O'BRIEN T. WALKER W.MCTIGUE Provide status of scheduled work activities for McTigue to review MMIS status and follow-up with EMIS tags: 0077880,18617,15904,11503, planning as necessary Forecast $/10 am response.
050337,06615,15703.
Licensing W workorder screen prints for 18617, 15904,11503 and 15703. 77880,50337 and 6615 are with Planning for followup.
SIT-112 5/9/95 PLAN W. O'BRIEN T. WALKER W. McTigue Workorder 950418079: *2 Gen Vreg in alarm" Question and MMIS workorder screen print provided to was sched for 5/8 (or 5/5 pod) - rescheduled? to W. O'Brien. Reply %d 5/10/95.
when? When wasitidentified? Whyisit "B" pnonty?
i SIT-ll5 5/9/95 MAINT M.MORRONI P.ESELGRO111 W.MCTIGUE
'Ihe 5/9 response to SIT-86 identified two cases Morrom provided with packages on 5/9 pm. Request where a troubleshooting procedure was used reply by 5/10 pm. SEE SIT-089 and M. Morroni's because the original work package was found to response to QA finding as documented in PMG 95 0208.
be unworkable W/O's 950406037 and 950226056. In these cases, does Maintenance -
[
Controls consider the use of the troubleshooting procedure to be appropriate?
t 2
j i
1
- - - ~. -
- - _ - ~ -,.
.-c
<.. ~..
.w..
n
ITEM CATE RESP PSEG SPONSOR NRC INSPECTOR STATUS UPDATE NUMBER ISSUED DEPT LR SPONSOR DESCRIPTION SIT-ll6 5/9/95 SQA D. TAUBER P.ESELGROUI W.MCTIGUE For 47 troubleshooting gW-work D. Tauber pnmded with the packages on SM pm.
packages pnmded in response to SIT-86, Feedback requested by 5//10 pm.
determine whether use of troubleshooting FM-6 was appropnate.
SrT-117 5M/95 NTC A.OR11CFI T F P. ESELGROni P. MOELLER Please provide training handouts used at NTC.
Discussed with A. Orticelle 5/9/pm; reply requested by relative to the April 7 event and the Turbine 5/10.
Generator failure.
SIT-Il9 5M/95 TECH MADSEN/PEHUS S.BARR W.MCTIGUE Pnmde list of Hagan controller modules List with component ID's and rack location was reviewed (XREF: SIT-071, NJS 2N1701 transistors).
with NRC 5/10 am. Inspector iWJ e- ;=- ^
f=wGe.el description (e.g.,11 SG level control, etc).
Request marked-up table by 5/10 pm.
SIT-120 5/10/95 NE SANTONASTAS P.ESELGROITI W.MCTIGUE Is there a program in place to review the Bills FAX'd to L. Santonastaso, v-mail to R. Bastell, 5/10 pm.
of Material and correct dim
- ---M. other Request reply by end of 5/10.
l than fixing them on a case-bye basis?
SIT-121 5/10/95 GMSTF WILTSEE G.GALLETTI W.MCTIGUE Provide a status ofIR's with breakdown of Discussed with Galletti and Wiltsee on 5/ld. Wiltsee actions by 4, 64..t from 2/1/95.
working to provide by 5/11.
SIT-122 5/10/95 GMSTF WILTSEE G.GALLETTI W.MCTIGUE Provide data on number ofIR actions originally Discussed with Galletti and Wiltsee on 5/10. Wiltsee due 4/95, relative to whether the actions were verking to provide by 5/11.
completed or duc dates extended.
16 open questions 3
~
^-
s REGION 1 MORNING REPORT PAGE 3 NOVEMBER 18,1991 Licensee / Facility:
Notification:
Public Service Electric 11/18/91 AIT 12ader and Gas Company Salem Unit 2 Docket No. 50-311
. PWR/ Westinghouse 4 loop Subjug: Salem 2 AIT Reportable Event No.: 22209 Discussion: Update of PNO-I-91-81. The AIT at Salem 2 continues. Licensee evaluation of the November 9 turbine damage / generator fire event has proceeded very carefully and methodically.
The following equipment damage, beyond that mentioned in the Preliminary Notification, has been identified:
-- over 80 tubes in the #22 condenser were cut by turbine blade fragments, resulting in chloride contamination of the secondary plant;
-- the "LO" blades in all three low pressure (LP) turbines have about 1/8 inch of their tips sheared;
-- stator water cooling lines ruptured, resulting in flooding of the generator stator;
-- generator rotor windings have loosened, apparently from vibration and overspeed;
-- a now diffuser in the #22 LP turbine sheared its mounting bolts during the event and appare.ntly fell into the turbine blade path, causing the extensive blade damage and the turbine casing ruptures; and
-- the #9 shaft bearing is badly damaged and seized.
Licensee reconstruction of a sequence of events and evaluation of potential causes continue. This evaluation is focusing on turbine controls and the turbine tests that were in progress when the
(
event began A comprehensive test and troubleshooting procedure is being finalized -- this procedure will test turbine control components and circuitry and may confirm several suspected component failures. The licensee suspects that a solenoid operated emergency trip valve, as well as redundant overspeed protection control solenoids failed to automatically trip the tt.dh'e in the l
event.
The unit remains in cold shutdown at 110 degrees F with the primary plant vented to the pressurizer relief tank. RHR shutdown cooling is in service. The licensee has commenced the
,. sixth refueling outage. Preparations for reactor disassembly are currently underway.
The NRC AIT will continue onsite at least through Wednesday and is tentatively planning an exit meeting for November 25.
Regional Action: Continue AIT.
Contact:
John White FTS: (609)935-3850
(
4 i
-