ML102720651

Williams Q&A - Request #24 - Iwl Exam - 6 Tm Tendon Survel Test Rept

ML102720651
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	10/30/2009
From:	Florida Power Corp
To:	Office of Information Services
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0116
Download: ML102720651 (329)

Text

{{#Wiki_filter:1jH 20 rie~~' ~ 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THEFord POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE Florida CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANTuT Power d 66UNIT 3 CORPORATION SI. SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES Volume 2, Section 9, Appendix F of the 20th Year Physical Surveillance Report contains the detailed procedures for conducting the tendon surveillance. The surveillance consists of the following steps: 1. Visual examination of casing filler grease.2. Analytical testing of casing filler grease samples.3. Inspection of the anchor assembly of each of the surveillance tendon ends for deleterious conditions such as corrosion, cracks, broken or missing buttonheads.

4. Inspection of concrete surrounding the bearing plate.5. Measurement of the liftoff force for each of the surveillance tendons.6". Removal of one wire from the surveillance tendons which are detensioned for examination and testing.7. Retensioning of the detensioned tendons and measuring the corresponding tendon elongation.

8. Visual inspection for corrosion, pitting, or any significant physical change of wires removed from the tendons.9. Testing of wires removed from tendons for yield strength, ultimate strength, and percentage elongation at failure.10. Resealing tendon cans and replacement of lost sheathing filler into the j tendon duct and grease can.11. Evaluation of test and inspection results to assess the general condition of the post tensioning system.i1 20TIH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE Florida-- CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT Power UNIT 3 COPORATON lI. SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS A sample of sheathing filler (grease) was removed from each end of the surveillance tendons.Chemical tests were performed on each sample by Suburban Laboratories, Inc., the results are presented in Appendix B and are summarized in Table 1.The maximum acceptable limits are 10 percent by weight for water content and 10 parts per million for water-soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulfides.

All samples met the acceptance criteria as stated above in all respects except 51H25 field end which had a water content result of 14.9%. As there is a limited amount of grease available for testing in this grease cans, due to the large shim volume, and a leaking gasket. The small quantity of grease did not allow for additional samples and the water penetration was in the area of gasket failure. This result is not necessarily indicative of the tendon grease conditionýthroughout the tendon. Inspection of the tendon end anchorage, shims, and buttonheads showed no abnormal corrosion which would indicate a moisture problem. The gasket was replaced and the anchorage refilled with new grease.'~j Tendon 53H2 samples were unavailable for testing.Also included was the report of the neutralization number of each grease sample. This test is generally performed by grease manufacturers on new batches of the product. It is a method of determining the overbase additives in the grease. Degradation of the sheathing filler will yield a change in the acidity of* the filler material as well as an increase in the ion content. The required neutralization number is>3mg KOH/g and has been achieved by all samples in this test.The large range in the neutralization numbers found between various tendons is indicative of different types of grease, such as P2 and P4, where P2 was originally installed and P4 added during latter work.This is not a sign of grease or system degradation. qj 2 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIIE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION l I TABLE I: LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATHING FILLER TENDON END ION CONCENTRATION (PPM) % WATER NEUTRAL No.I CHLORIDE NITRATE SULFIDE CONTENT mg KOHI/g 12VI SHOP/TOP <0.50 1.24 <0.50 0.1 42.1 FIELD/ BOTT. <0.50 1.02 <0.50 0.4 42.1 23V2 SHOP/ TOP <0.50 1.46 <0.50 0.2 46.6 FIELD/ BOTT. <0.50 2.02 <0.50 0.1 47.1 61V21 SHOP/TOP <0.50 1.02 <0.50 0.2 50.5_FIELD/BOlT. <0.50 1.46 <0.50 <0.1 24.1 D113 SHOP/NEAR 2 <0.50 0.79 <0.50 <0.1 36.5 FIELD/NEAR 6 <0.50 1.13 <0.50 0.1 39.3'.15 SHOP/NEAR 2 <0.50 1.68 <0.50 0.2 40.9 FIELD/NEAR 6 <0.50 1.13 <0.50 0.2 43.2 D212 SHOP/NEAR 1 <0.50 1.13 <0.50 0.1 26.4 FIELD/NEAR 3 <0.50 0.68 <0.50 0.1 40.9 D304 SHOP/NEAR 4 <0.50 0.79 <0.50 0.3 40.9 FIELD/NEAR 2 <0.50 0.68 <0.50 0.1 33.7 D311 SHOP/NEAR 4 <0.50 1.02 <0.50 0.3 47.7 L FIELD/NEAR 2 <0.50 0.68 <0.50 0.1 33.7 i J Acceptance Limits Test Water Soluble Chloride Water Soluble Nitrates Water Soluble Sulfides Water Content Neutralization No.Limits Less than 10.0 ppm Less than 10.0 ppm Less than 10.0 ppm Less than 10% Dry Weight Greater than 3 mg KOH/g 3 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION TABLE I: LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATHING FILLER:!TENDON END ION CONCENTRATION (PPM) % WATER NEUTRAL No.I CHLORIDE NITRATE SULFIDE CONTENT mg KOII/g 42H18 SHOP/BUTT 4 <0.50 1.02 <0.50 0.1 11.8 FIELD/BUTT 2 <0.50 1.02 <0.50 0.1 41.5 42H32 SHOP/ BUTT 4 <0.50 0.68 <0.50 0.1 33.7 I_ FIELD/ BUTT 2 <0.50 0.79 <0.50 <0.1 42.1 42H44 SHOP/ BUTT 4 <0.50 0.68 <0.50 <0.1 42.1 FIELD/BUTT 2 <0.50 2.13 <0.50 <0.1 21.3 5IH25 FIELD/BUTT5 <0.50 3.25 <0.50 14.9 30.8 511126 SHOP/BUTT 1 <0.50 3.58 <0.50 0.1 1112 FIELD/BUTT 5 <0.50 1.02 <0.50 <0.1 42.1 53H46 SHOP/ BUTT 5 <0.50 0.68 <0.50 <0.1 36.5 FIELD/BUTT 3 <0.50 1.13 <0.50 <0.1 4.49 62H41 SHOP/BUTT 2 <0.50 1.24 <0.50 <0.1 40.9 FIELD/ BUTT 6 <0.50 2.69 <0.50 <0.1 28.0 62H46 SHOP/BUTT 2 <0.50 1.35 <0.50 0.2 38.7 FIELD/ BUTT 6 <0.50 0.90 <0.50 <0.1 6.17 o t!!Acceptance Limits Test Water Soluble Chloride Water Soluble Nitrates Water Soluble Sulfides Water Content Neutralization No.Less than i0.0 ppm Less than 10.0 ppm Less than 10.0 ppm Less than 10% Dry Weight Greater than 3 mg KOH/g 4

• 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE Florida CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT Power UNIT 3 coroAn IIl. ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS In the following discussion, all procedures referred to are included in Volume 2, Section 9, Appendix F of the 20th Year Physical Report while all data sheets are included in Section 4, Appendix A.Inspection of the anchorage components began with the removal of the grease can (PSC Procedure SQ 6.0). Complete grease coating (100%) was found on all surveillance tendons except 42H18 field end with 70% of grease can coated, 42H32 field end with 60% of the grease can coated, 62H41 shop end with 60% of the grease can coated and 62H41 field end with 70% of the grease can coated. The percentage of grease coverage was recorded on Data Sheet SQ 6.0 with the results tabulated in Table I!.During removal of the grease can and physical inspections of the anchorage assemblies water was detected during removal of a can, or inside it, on only one tendon end. Tendon 51H25 fiild end exhibited drops of water in the grease can. No water was detected in any other surveillance or grease repair tendon. Water Inspections were recorded on Data Sheet SQ 6.1 and are summarized in Table III.The anchorage components (anchorhead, bushing, shims, buttonhead and bearing plate) were inspected for corrosion level and cracks per PSC Procedure SQ 8.0. The results were recorded on Data Sheet SQ 8.0 and are summarized in Table IV. Corrosion levels on all items was either level I -"bright metal, no visible oxidation", or level 2 -"reddish brown color, no pitting".

No evidence of cracking was observed in any of the anchorage components. 5 20Thl YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 6 "Florida o Power CORPORATION 4 Ill. ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS The buttonheads were inspected for their physical condition and a count was made of protruding or missing buttonheads per PSC Procedure SQ 8.0. The results of these inspections are also recorded on Data Sheet SQ 8.0, and summarized in Table V.\.- d Tendon 12VI shop end was found'to have one wire protruding 0.6" and NCR No. FN604-001 was.written to address this.* .1*1 Tendon 51H26 (field end shown) was found to have one broken wire 6.05" long after initial liftoff was performed. NCR No. FN604-003 was generated to document this finding and the broken section was later removed during detensioning. A continuity test was conducted and all remaining wire were found to be continuous 201TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATTION IIl. ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS t This picture of 51H27 field end shows the two small buttonheads reported on Data Sheet SQ 8.0 in red. The wires circled in green were found to be protruding after liftoff and removed. The pieces were found to be 6.15" long and NCR No. FN604-007 was raised to document this occurrence. .!a ,o°g.)-I Tendon 62H41 was also found to have two broken wires after detensioning, NCR No. FN604-015 recorded this finding.No other missing or protruding wires not previously reported were found.Cans were also removed to the shop end of 43V4 and the field end of 51H41 where "domed" or bulging can ends were found. Inspection revealed no apparent abnormalities and the anchorage, shims and buttonheads were found to be acceptable in all respect.7 20Til YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida S- oe III. ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS

• j~1'I* I d* I-j* I Scratches found on the face of the anchorhead on 52H46 shop end were reported on Data Sheet SQ 8.0 9 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION Ill. ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS

--i --JB ,. 1 S* I* 4 The above 3/8" shim on tendon 51 H27 field end was found to be deformed at the shim gap which was 0.8" wide. This shim was replaced and the shim gap closed up during liftoff.9 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIlE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT-UNIT 3 III. ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS Pieces of rope found protruding from shim gap on tendon 51H28 field end.Florida 0.Power 1014F.. FCORPORATION wr F, -f z 10 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida-owe I III.*1*1 I ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS The concrete was inspected around the bearing plates for cracks per PSC Procedure SQ 8.3 with the results being recorded on Data Sheet SQ 8.3 and summarized in Table VI. Two tendons exhibited cracks exceeding 0.010", D311 and 5 1H26 (shown on the next two pages). No cracks that had a width in excess of 0.010" were found to any other inspection tendon. Data Sheets SQ 8.4 detail the general containment exterior concrete inspection and at the time of the surveillance a contractor was on site making concrete repairs to the containment buttresses. Bearing plate ID's were either illegible or not found on several tendon ends..1 11 20THl YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 ro- Florida S~Power CO"PORATION .1'1*1.1 III. ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS Crack found around the bearing plate at 5 1-H26 shop end.See NCR No. FN604-004 I I 12 20TII YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIHE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 ( ov"' Florida 3 WjjPower 0#0004CORPORATION' J1 I1. ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS ri*1* J* L~-wi-~1*'~.. '~'4-.,..-.,-.. ~-.~., ..~'.'jL Cracks found on tendon 52H26 field end.See NCR No. FN604-002*%.1 ., .1 g 1, * , All.8 0.,Ord*

• y~1* J-.1 4-.~* -....C> -..8*13

" 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIlE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT-~ UNIT 3 TABLE II:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 6.0 GREASE CAN REMOVAL.Florida Power CORPORATION '1..1 TENDON END GREASE COATING (%)GREASE BUTTON- ANCHOR- SHIMS BEARING CAN -HEADS HEADS PLATE 12VI SHOP/TOP 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BOT. 100 100 100 100 100 23V2 SHOP/TOP 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BOT. 100 100 100 100 100 61V21 SHOP/TOP 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BOT. 100 100 100 00 100 V4 SHOP/TOP 100 '00 100 100 100 D113 SHOP/NEAR 2 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/NEAR6 100 100 100 100 100 DI1 SHOP/NEAR 2 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/NEAR 6 100 100 100 100 100 D212 SHOP/NEAR 1 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/NEAR 3 100 100 100 100 100 D304 SHOP/NEAR4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/NEAR2 100 100 100 100 100 D311 SHOP/NEAR 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/NEAR 2 100 100 100 100 100 14 20TI! YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3?Florida Power CORPORATION .1 TABLE If:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 6.0 GREASE CAN REMOVAL Ii* j TENDON END GREASE COATING (%)GREASE BUTTON- ANCHOR- SHINMS BEARING CAN IHEADS lHEADS PLATE 42H!8 SHOP/BUTI 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 2 70 100 100 100 100 42H29 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 2 100 100 100 100 100 42H30 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 2 100 100 100 100 100 421131 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 2 100 100 100 100 100 42H32 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 2 60 100 100 100 100 421133 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 2 100 100 100 100 100 421134 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/ BUTT 2 100 100 100 100 100 42H35 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 2 100 100 100 100 100 42H36 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 2 100 100 100 100 100 42H37 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT2 100 100 100 100 100'U.1.1.1 15 20TI" YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIlE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power 0 CORPORATION !TABLE II:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 6.0 GREASE CAN REMOVAL! 1'1* g TENDON END GREASE COATING (%)GREASE BUTTON- ANCHOR- SHIMS BEARING CAN HEADS HEADS PLATE 42H44 SHOP/BUTT 4 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 2 100 100 100 100 100 51H25 SHOP/BUTT 1 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 5 100 100 100 100 100 511126 SHOP/BUTT 1 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 5 100 100 100 100 100 511127 S...OP/.BUTT 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/ BUTT 5 100 100 100 100 100, 51H28 SHOP/BUTT 1 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 5 100 100 100 100 100 53112 SHOP/BUTTS 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 3 100 100 100 100 100 531146 SHOP/BUTT 5 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 3 100 100 100 100 100 62H41 SHOP/BUTT 2 60 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTTI6 70 100 100 100 100 621146 SHOP/BUTT 2 100 100 100 100 100 FIELD/BUTT 6 100 100 100 100 100 51H41 FIELD/BUTT 5 100 100 100 100 100:1 b o 16 20THl YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION J.1 TABLE III:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER-' I-TENDON END WATER QUANTITY 12VI SHOP/TOP NONE FIELD/BOT. NONE 23V2 SHOP/TOP NONE FIELD/BOT. NONE 61V21 SHOP/TOP NONE FIELD/BOT. NONE 43V4 SHOP/TOP NONE Lm SHOP i J 12VI 23V2 61V21 43V4 I NONE FOUND I 0 10 , 20 30 40 OUNCES 50 60 70 17 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida S~Power CORPORATIN i TABLE III:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER.TENDON END WATER QUANTITY D113 SHOP/NEAR 2 NONE FIELD/NEAR 6 NONE D115 SHOP/NEAR 2 NONE FIELD/NEAR 6 NONE D212 SHOP/NEAR 1 NONE FIELD/ NEAR 3 NONE D304 SHOP/NEAR 4 NONE FIELD/NEAR 2 NONE 311 SHOP/NEAR 4 NONE FIELD/NEAR 2 NONE.0 SllOP FIELD DI13 D212 D304 D311 I NONEFOUND I 0 10 20 30 40 50 OUNCES 60 70 18 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT3 Florida Power CORPORATION TABLE III:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER.'*1'1 TENDON END WATER QUANTITY 42H18 SHOP/ BUTT 4 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 NONE 421129 SHOP/BUTT 4 NONE FIELD/BUTT 2 NONE 421130 SHOP/ BUTT 4 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 NONE 421131 SHOP/BUTI 4 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 NONE 1132 SHOP/ BUTT 4 NONE FIELD/BU1Tr 2 NONE* *SHOP F--EnLD I J a'421118 421129 421130 421131 42H32 NONE FOUND[0 10 20 30 40 50 OUNCES 60 70 19 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE*CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE III:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER.Florida Power CORPORATION TENDON END WATER QUANTITY 421133 SHOP/ BUTT 4 NONE FIELD/BUTT 2 NONE 421134 SHOP/ BUTT 4 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 NONE 42H35 SHOP/ BUTT 4 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 NONE 421136 SHOP/ BUTT 4 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 NONE r 1H37 SHOP/ BUTT 4 FIELD/ BUTT 2 NONE NONE SIIOP FIELD 421133 421134 421135 42H36 42H37 NONE FOUND I 0 10 20 30 40 so OUNCES 60 70!20 .20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIIE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE III:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER Florida Power COPORMATION TENDON END J WATER QUANTITY 42H44 SHOP/ BUTT 4 NONE FIELD/BUTT 2 NONE 51H25 SHOP/BUTT 1 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 5 DROPS 511126 SHOP/BUTT I NONE FIELD/ BUTT 5 NONE 511127 SHOPI BUTT I NONE FIELD/ BUTT 5 NONE 1128 SHOP! BUTT 1 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 5 NONE t i *421144 51H25 51H26 51H27 51H28]M s1lop E:1 IFIELD 0 10 20 30 40 OUNCES 50 60 70 K- A.I 21 20TIH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION J I TABLE III:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 6.1 INSPECT FOR WATER TENDON END WATER QUANTITY 53H2 SHOP/BUTT 5 NONE FIELD/BUFT 3 NONE 531146 SHOP/ BUTT 5 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 3 NONE 62H41 SHOP/ BUTT 2 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 6 NONE 621146 SHOP/ BUTT 2 NONE FIELD/ BUTT 6 NONE H41 FIELD/BUTT5 NONE i~1 SHOP t I1 53112 53H46 621141 621146 511141 I NONEFOUND I i 0 10 20 30 40 OUNCES 50 60 70 22 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE IV:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITION aFlorida Power s., CORPORATION TENDON END ANCHOR BUTTONHEAD CORROSION LEVEL, CRACKS I.D. CORROSION ANCHOR- SHIMS BEARING CONDITION HEAD PLATE 12VI SHOP/TOP CR650/PCI21 1 1, NONE 2, NONE 2 1 NONE FIELD/BOT. NOT FOUND 1 2, NONE 2, NONE 2, NONE 23V2 SHOP/TOP CR736/PC121 1 2, NONE 2, NONE 2, NONE FIELD/BOT. CR239/PC120 1 2, NONE 2, NONE 2, NONE 61V21 SHOP/TOP CR957/PCI121 1 2, NONE I, NONE 2, NONE FIELD/BOT. CR189/PC120 1 1, NONE I,NONE I, NONE 43V4 SHOP/TOP CR788/PCI21 N/A NONE NONE NONE'%113 SHOP/NEAR 2 CR41I/PCI21 I 2, NONE I,NONE I,NONE FIELD/NEAR 6 CR1075/PCI21 1 2, NONE 2, NONE 2, NONE D1I1 SHOP/NEAR2 CR675/PCI21 I 2, NONE I,NONE 2, NONE FIELD/NEAR 6 CR1231/PCI22 I 2, NONE 1, NONE I, NONE D212 SHOP/NEAR I CRI032/PCI21 I LNONE I,NONE 2, NONE FIELD/NEAR 3 CR1214/PC122 I 1, NONE I, NONE 1, NONE D304 SHOP/NEAR4 CR479/PCI21 I 2,NONE 1,NONE I,NONE FIELD/NEAR 2 CR696/PCI21 1 I, NONE INONE 2, NONE D311 SHOP/NEAR4 CRI040/PCI21 I I,NONE I,NONE 2, NONE FIELDD/NEAR2 CR636/PCI21 I 1, NONE 1, NONE 2, NONE*!t 1 2 3 Bright metal; no visible oxidation. Metal redish brown color, no pitting Patches of red oxide, no visible pits.!23 'ý .20TII YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TilE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE IV:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITION Florida Power CORPORATION-e t TENDON END ANCHOR BITMONIIEAD CORROSION LEVEL, CRACKS I.D. CORROSION ANCIIOR- SHIMS BEARING CONDITION HEAD I PLATE 42H18 SHOP/BUTI4 CR615/PCI21 2 2, NONE 2, NONE 2, NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 CR906/PC121 1 2, NONE 1, NONE 2, NONE 42H29 SHOP/ BUTT 4 CR606/PCi21 N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 CR1208/PCI22 N/A NONE NONE NONE 421130 SHOP/BUTT 4 CR569/PCI2I N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/BUTT 2 CR1143/PC122 N/A NONE NONE NONE 421131 SHOP/BUTT 4 CR368/PC121 N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 CR1233/PC122 N/A NONE NONE NONE'-42H32 SHOP/ BUTT 4 CR564/PCI21 1 2, NONE 2, NONE 2, NONE FIELD/BUTT 2 CR123/PCI20 I 2, NONE 1, NONE 1, NONE 421133 SHOP/ BUTT 4 CR546/PC121 NIA NONE NONE NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 CR934/PCI21 N/A NONE NONE NONE 42H34 SHOP/ BUTT 4 CR525/PCI21 N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/BUTT 2 CR1207/PC122 N/A NONE NONE NONE 42H35 SHOP/LBUTT 4 CR547/PCI21 N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/ BUTT 2 CR1229/PCI22 N/A NONE NONE NONE 42H36 SHOP/BUTT 4 CR522/PC121 N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/BUTT 2 CR1174/PC122 N/A NONE NONE NONE 42H37 SHOP/BUTT 4 CR559/PCI21 N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/BUTT2 CR! 175/PC122 N/A NONE NONE NONE t I Bright metal; no visible oxidation. 2 Metal redish brown color, no pitting 3 Patches of red oxide, no visible pits.24 20TI! YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT3*Florida Power CORPORMTION G!TABLE IV:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 8.0 ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITION TENDON END ANCHOR BUrrONIIEAD CORROSION LEVEL, CRACKS I.D. CORROSION ANCHOR- SHIMS BEARING CONDITION HEAD PLATE 42H44 SHOP/BUTT4 CR572/PC121 1 I, NONE 2, NONE 2, NONE FIELD/BUTT2 CR1230/PCI22 1 1, NONE 2, NONE I, NONE 51H25 SHOP/ BUTT I CR26/PC120 N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/BUTT5 CR1126/PCI22 I 1, NONE 2, NONE 2, NONE 51H26 SHOP/BUTT I CR384/PCI21 1 2, NONE 1, NONE 1, NONE FIELD/BUTT 5 CR897/PCI21 I 1, NONE 1, NONE 1, NONE 51H27 SHOP/BUTT I CR366/PCI21 N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/BUTT 5 CR1088/PC12I .N/A NONE NONE NONE-1H28 SHOP/BUTT' I CR49/PCi20 N/A NONE NONE NONE FIELD/ BUTT 5 CR1 173/PC122 N/A NONE NONE NONE 53112 SHOP/BUTT 5 CRI35/PCI20 1 2, NONE 1, NONE 1, NONE FIELD/BUTT 3 CR646/PC12I 1 2, NONE 2, NONE I, NONE 53H46 SHOP/BUTT 5 CR660/PCI2I 1 2, NONE 1, NONE 2, NONE FIELD/BUTT 3 CR1197/PCI22 I 1, NONE 1, NONE 2, NONE 62H41 SHOP/BUTT 2 CR355/PCI20 I 1, NONE I, NONE 2, NONE FIELD/BUTI"6 CR454/PCI21 I I, NONE 1, NONE 1, NONE 62H46 SHOP/BUTT 2 CR!56/PC120 2 2, NONE 2, NONE 1, NONE FIELD/BUTT 6 CR979/PCI21 I 1, NONE 1, NONE 1, NONE 51H41 FIELD/BUTT_5 CRi222/PC122 N/A NONE NONE NONE* 1-.1 I Bright metal; no visible oxidation. 2 Metal redish brown color, no pitting 3 Patches of red oxide, no visible pits.25 -.-. ~C 20TI YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIIE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 C Florida Power-COMPOAMIN TABLE V:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 8.0 -BUTTONHIEAD COUNT TENDON END ORIGINAL AS FOUND AS +LEFT J REMOVED TOTAL EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE PROTRUDE BROKEN/ PROTRUDE BROKEN/ PROTRUDE BROKEN/ FOR WIRES WIRES MISSING MISSING MISSING TESTING AS FOUND ASLEFT 12VI SI1OPfTOP 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 1 162 162 FIELD/BOT. 0 1 0 I 0 1 0 1 162 162 23V2 SHIOPfrOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/DOT. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 61V21 SHOP/TOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 163 162 FIELD/DOT. 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 163 162 43V4 SIIOPfrOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 D113 SI1OP/NEAR2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/NEAR 6 0 0 0 0 0 0" 0 0 163 163 DIIS SIIOP/NEAR2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/NEAR 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 D212 SIIOP/NEAR I 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 162 162 FIELD/NEAR 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 162 162 D304 SHOP/NEAR 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 163 162 FIELD/NEAR 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 163 162 D311 SIIOP/NEAR4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/NEAR 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 B J 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE V:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 8.0 -B1UTTONHEAD COUNT C Florida Power COMRPOIAMro TENDON END ORIGINAL AS FOUND AS LEFT REMOVED TOTAL EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE PROTRUDE BROKEN/ PROTRUDE BROKENi/ PROTRUDE BROKEN/ FOR WIRES WIRES MISSING MISSING MISSING TESTING AS FOUND ASLEFT 421118 SltOP/BUTT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/ BUIT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 421129 SHOP/BUTT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTr 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 421130 Sl IOP/BUTT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTr 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 421131 SllOP! BUTT4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUrT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 421132 SIIOP/ UWTT4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 421133 S1lOP/1BUT"4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTT 2 0 0 .0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 = -- .'20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE V:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 8.0 -BUTrONHEAD COUNT C Florida Power CORPORAITON a TENDON END IORIGINAL AS FOUND AS LEFT REMOVED TOTAL EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE PROTRUDE BROKEN/ PROTRUDE BROKEN/ PROTRUDE BROKEN/ FOR WIRES WIRES MISSING MISSING MISSING TESTING AS FOUND AS LEFT 421134 SIIOP/1B3UT4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 421135 SIIOP/ BUTT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 163 162 FIELD/BUTT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 163 162 42H36 SIIOP/BUTT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 421137 SIliOP/BUTT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BBUIT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 .163 421144 SIIOP/BUTT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 511125 SIIOP/ BUTT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTT 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 511126 SIIOP/BUTTFI 0 0 0 0 0 1* 2 163 161 FIELD/IBUTT 1 0 0 0 0 0 1* 2 2 163 161* FOUND BROKEN AFTER LIFTOFF J C.C C 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION TABLE V:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 8.0 -BUTTONHEAD COUNT TENDON END ORIGINAL AS FOUND AS LEFT REMOVED TOTAL EFFECTIVE EFFECTIVE PROTRUDE BROKEN/ PROTRUDE BROKEN/ PROTRUDE BROKEN/ FOR WIRES WIRES MISSING MISSING MISSING TESTING AS FOUND AS LEFT 511127 SHOP/BUTTI 0 0 0 0 0 2'* 2 2 163 161 FIELD/BUTr 5 0 0 0 0 0 2&* 2 2 163 161 511128 SIIOPI BUTT I1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTT 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 53112 SHOP/BUT' 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUT 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 531146 SHOP/BUTT 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 FIELD/BUTT 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163. 163 621141 SIIOP/BUTT 2 0 0 0 2

• 0 3 3 3 163 160 FIELD/BUTT 6 0 0 0 2 & 0 3 3 3 163 160 621146 SIIOP/BU1T2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 163 163 FIELD/BUTT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 511141 FIELD/BUTT 5 0 0 0 0 ".0 0 0 0 163 163* FOUND BROKEN AFTER LIFTOFF* FOUND BROKEN AFTER DETENSIONING 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION TABLE VI:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 8.3 CONCRETE INSPECTION. TENDON END BEARING CRACKS WITII WIDTHS >0.010" PLATE ID QUANTITY MAX. MAX. WIDTH I LENGTH (IN) (IN)12VI SHOP/TOP CR973 NONE N/A N/A FIELD/BOT. CRI I8/PC58 NONE N/A N/A 23V2 SHOP/TOP NOT FOUND NONE N/A N/A FIELD/BOT. CRI 14/PC58 NONE N/A N/A 61V21 SHOP/TOP NOT FOUND NONE N/A N/A FIELD/BOT. NOT FOUND NONE N/A N/A!D113 SHOP/NEAR 2 NOT FOUND NONE N/A N/A FIELD/NEAR 6 NOT FOUND NONE N/A N/A DI5 SHOP/NEAR 2 NOT FOUND NONE N/A N/A FIELD/NEAR 6 CR919/PC91 NONE N/A N/A D212 SHOP/NEAR I CR910/PC88 NONE N/A N/A FIELD/NEAR 3 CR764/PC91 NONE N/A N/A D304 SHOP/ NEAR 4 NOT FOUND NONE N/A N/A FIELD/ NEAR 2 NOT FOUND NONE N/A N/A D311 SHOP/NEAR4 CR846/PC91 NONE N/A N/A FIELD/NEAR 2 NOT FOUND TWO 24" <0.050 I.4 0*SEE NCRN FN604-016 30 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT ms UNIT 3 TABLE VI:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 8.3 CONCRETE INSPECTION. Florida Power CORJPORATION '~1 TENDON END BEARING CRACKS WITH WIDTHS >0.010" PLATE ID QUANTITY MAX. MAX. WIDTH ILENGTlH (IN) (IN)421118 SHOP/ BUTT 4 CR300/PC87 NONE N/A N/A FIELD/ BUTT 2 CR3731PC87 NONE N/A N/A 42H32 SHOP/ BUTT 4 CR2541PC88 NONE N/A N/A FIELD/ BUTT 2 CP654/PC76 NONE N/A N/A 42H44 SHOP/ BUTT 4 CR689/PC77 NONE N/A N/A FIELD/BUTT 2 CR163/PC77 NONE N/A N/A 5IIH26

• SHOP/ BUTT I CR217/PC77 TWO 15" 0.30"-** FIELD/BUTT 5 CR616/PC77 ONE 15" 0.10" 53112 SHOP/BUTT 5 CR51I/PC76 NONE N/A N/A FIELD/ BUTT 3 CR539/PC76 NONE N/A N/A 53H46 SHOP/ BUTT 5 CR705/PC77 NONE N/A N/A FIELD/ BUTT 3 CR439/PC76 NONE N/A N/A 62H41 SHOP/ BUTT 2 CR202/PC76 NONE N/A N/A FIELD/ BUTT 6 CR1 87/76 NONE N/A N/A 62H46 SHOP/ BUTT 2 NOT FOUND NONE N/A N/A FIELD/ BUTT 6 CR549/PC76 NONE N/A N/A.1* SEE NCR# FN604-004** SEE NCR# FN604-002'I 31 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION
• t'*1.1 IV. HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATIONS Precision Surveillance has developed a program for calibrating hydraulic jacks utilizing regression analysis (PSC Procedure QA 12.8.G-W).

This is a process where a straight line is mathematically best fitted to a set of data points (in this case, force verses gauge pressure). This results in calculating ram area (slope) and constant (y-intercept) for each jack calibration. Completed calibrations for all of the hydraulic jacks used are contained in Appendix C and are summarized in Table Vii.A before and after comparison of the stressing jacks' ram areas revealed that none of the jacks'calibrations varied by more than 0.77% indicating that they were in a properly calibrated status.Note that the force exerted by a jack can be calculated as follows: Force = Area x Pressure + Constant (F). (in 2) (KSI) (K)I-a 32 (C C 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORAMNON TABLE VII: HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATIONS JACK BEFORE SURVEILLANCE FORCE AFTER SURVEILLANCE FORCE MAX VARI ID DATE AREA CONSTANT (Fi) DATE AREA CONSTANT (Ff) PRESSURE %(in') (kips) (in) (kips)8778 10/9/97 333.423 1.640 1835466.5 1/20/98 333.564 -7.497 1827105 5500 0.46 8833 10/9/97 335.178 -0.321 1843158 1/20/98. 335.008 -3.148 1839396 5500 0.20 9501 12/I 1/97 368.689 1.554 1918736.8 1/20/98 372.715 4.549 1933569 5200 0.77 7702 2/17/98 1.542 0.120 13227 3/23/98 1.552 0.068 13260 8500 0.25 RAM 7702 USED FOR WIRE TESTING /20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE Florida CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT POwer'3 co"oPA-No V. TENDON LIFTOFFS AND DETENSIONING A liftoff is performed on each surveillance tendon to monitor the force exerted by the tendon onto the structure. PSC Procedure SQ 9.0 (Volume 2, Section 9, Appendix F) details the steps to be taken to perform a liftoff. The results are documented on Data Sheet SQ 9.0 and are summarized in Table VIII.It should be noted that performing a liftoff has only a localized effect on a tendon; therefore, it is acceptable to use the same jacks for both ends of a tendon by executing the liftoff on separate occasions. Vertical tendon liftoffs were found to be above the base value except for 12VI which was above 95%of base, and all dome liftoff averages were above the base value.Horizontal lifloffs revealed two isolated areas 421130 to 42H36 inclusive and 51 H26, 51 H27 where average tendon lifloffs were between 90% and 95% of base value. Two tendons, 42H35 and 51H26, were found to be below 90% of base value and detensioned for continuity test per FPC requirement. This continuity test revealed that all of the wires were continuous, one wire was removed from each tendon for testing and one broken wire removed from 51 H26 was also tested. After testing the tendons were restored to base value -0% +6%. All other tendons found between 90 and 95% of base value were subsequently restored per procedure to base value -0% +6%.These low liftoff results were documented on NCR's -010, 011, 012,.013, and 014 for 421-130 -36 and NCR 005 for 511-126.All other tendon liftoffs were either above base value or 95% of base value and therefore acceptable. The average normalized liftoff for each group, vertical, dome and horizontal, exceeded the minimum required and is acceptable. After completion of lifloffs, protruding wires were found to tendons 51 H26(I), 51 H27(2) and 62H46(2). These wires, once removed, were found to have broken behind the anchorhead. No corrosion was found to indicate wire failure due to deterioration and it is suspected that slight tendon head rotation while setting back down sheared the wires against the shims. In all cases the broken wires were on the outer comer edge of the tendon bundle and no gauge movement was noted to indicate failures during liftoff. These wires were probable "pinched" during original installation and additional work on these tendons has broken the wires. NCR's FN604-003,007 and 015 recorded these occurrences. 34 K;o .*I:. .*(C (20TIl YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95%, 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT WIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 12VI silopfroP 162 8833 4390 1471 1471 1530 1453 1377 -9 YES 23V2 siloPfroP 163 8778 4820 1609 1609 1482 1408 1333 37 YES 61V21 SHlOPf/OP 163 8833 4550 1525 .1525 1482 1408 1334 38 YES D113 SIIOP/2 163 8778 4267.5 1424.7 1427 1369 1301 1232 -35 YES FIELD/6 163 8833 4265 1429 YES DIIS SIIOP/2 163 8778 4062.5 1356 1380 1347 1280 1213 -12 YES FIELD/6 163 8833 4190 1404 YES D212 SHOP/I 162 8833 3820 1280 1335 1317 1252 1186 15 YES FIELDI3 162 8778 4160 1389 YES D304 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4810 1605 1598 1397 1327 1258 -64 YES FIELD/2 162 8833 4748 1591 YES D311 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4220 1409.5 1408 1335 1269 1202 0 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4200 1407 YES C C (20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power C01POIA.JO0N TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 -TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NOR3MALIZING ACCEPT WIRES No. JLIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 42HI8 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4690 1565 1476 1495 1420 1346 -56 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4137 1386.5 YES 421129 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4500 1502 1448 1445 1373 1300 -7 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4160 1394 YES 421130 SlIOP/4 163 8778 4355 1454 1389 1469 1396 1322 -32 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3950 1324 NO 421131 SiHOP/4 163 8778 4100 1369 1338 1460 1387 1314 -21 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3900 1307 NO 421132 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4320 1442 1355.5 1452 1380 1307 -15 NO FIELD12 163 8833 3785 1269 NO 421133 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4490 1499 1361 1474 1400 1326 -35 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3650 1223 NO 421134 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4240 1415 1377.5 1452 1380 1307 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 4000 1340 NO -. 4 .-, C (I (20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIHE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIHE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPJMOTI"II TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 -TENDON LIFTOFFS TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFrOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT WIRES No. LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 421135 SIIOPI4 163 8778 4110 1372 1296.5 1455 1382 1309 -17 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3693 1221 NO 421136 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4490 1499 1408 1503 1428 1353 -65 NO FIELD/2 163 8833 3930 1317 NO 42H37 SIIOP/4 163 8778 4310 1439 1401.5 1452 1379 1306 -14 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4070 1364 YES 421144 SI1OP/4 163 8778 4510 1505 1471.5 1427 1356 1285 10 YES FIELD/2 163 8833 4291 1438 YES 511125 SHOP/I 1 163 8833 4090 1370.5 1363 1401 1331 1261 38 YES FIELD/ 5 163 8778 4060 1355.5 YES 511126 SHOP/I 163 8833 4190 1403.5 1320 1514 1438 1363 -75 NO FIELD/5 163 8778 3705 1237 NO 511127 SHOP/1 163 8833 3787 1269 1265.5 1368 1300 1231 71 NO FIELD/51 163 8778 3780 1262 1 NO

• ,,d C ((20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE VIII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 9.0 -TENDON LIFTOFFS Florida Power CORPORAZON TENDON END EFFECT. JACK PRESS. LIFTOFF AVE. BASE 95% 90% NORMALIZING ACCEPT WIRES No. I LIFTOFF VALUE BASE BASE FACTOR 511128 SHOP/ 1 163 8833 4445 1489.5 1450.5 1518 1442 1367 80 YES FIELD/5 163 8778 4230 1412 YES 53112 SIIOP/5 163 9501 4400 1624 1611 1424 1353 1281 12 YES FIELD/3 163 9501 4330 1598 YES 531-146 SHlOP/5 163 8833 4340 1454 1459.5 1472 1399 1325 -35 YES FIELD/3 163 8778 4390 1465 YES 62H41 SHOP/2 163 8778 4230 1412 1426 1422 1351 1280 16 YES FIELD/6 163 8833 4297.5 1440 YES 621146 SHOP/2 163 8778 4280 1429 1485 1465 1392 1318 -27 YES FIELD/6 163 8833 4600 1541 -L YES-.~--,, 20Tll YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIHE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT-THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION .V.-WIRE INSPECTION AND TESTING One wire was scheduled for removal from each deiensioned tendon for visual inspection and tensile testing. PSC Procedure SQ 10.3 outlines the details involved with the wire testing and the data was recorded on Data Sheets SQ 10.2 and SQ 10.3 with the results summarized in Table X.All wire diameters were within the acceptance criteria of 0.27559 +/- 0.002". The corrosion condition of all samples was level I -"bright metal; no visible oxidation" and the Ultimate Strength exceeded the minimum strength criteria of 240,000 psi (240 ksi) for all wire samples tested.k,,/.!*I 40 C.C C 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION TABLE X:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 10.2 & 10.3 -VISUAL INSPECTION AND TENSILE TESTING OF WIRE TENDON SAMPLE CORROSION SAMPLE DIAMETER YIELD ULTIMATE *ACCEPTABLE No. LEVEL LOCATION (IN) STRENGTH STRENGTHI (Fr) (PSI) (PSI)61V21 1 1 20-29 0.275 210,770 249,197 YES 2 1 90-99 0.275 210,251 251,793 YES 3 1 170- 179 0.275 209,212 242,966 YES D304 1 1 20-29 0.2755 213,614 244,138 YES 2 1 60-69 0.2755 213,614 241,552 YES 3 1 100- 109 0.2755 217,236 250,864 YES 421135 1 1 20-29 0.276 210,286 241,219 YES 2 1 70- 79 0.276 210,802 246,375 YES 3 1 140- 149 0.276 212,864 253,077 YES 51H26 1 1 10-19 0.2745 210,512 254,293 YES 2 1 70-79 0.2745 209,990 248,560 YES 3 1 140-149 0.2745 216,766 243,869 YES 511126 IA. 1 10-19 0.2745 215,202 250,645 YES 2A 1 70-79 0.2745 214,160 253,251 YES 3A 1 146- 155 0.2745 220,415 257,942 YES 621141 1 1 20-29 0.2755 211,545 247,760 YES 2 1 70-79 0.2755 213,614 245,173 YES_ 3 1 140-149 0.2755 214,390 241,552 YES 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIlE Florida CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT Power UNIT 3 CORPORATION VII. TENDON RETENSIONING AND RESEALING Those scheduled tendons that had previously been detensioned for wire removal, (61V21, D304 and 62H41) along with additional detensioned tendons 42H35 and 51 H26 were retensioned per PSC Procedure SQ 11.0 (Volume 2, Section 9, Appendix F). The results of the retensioning process were recorded on Data Sheets SQ 11.0 and the results are summarized in Table XI.'1 All new elongations were compared to original elongations and found to be acceptable (within +10%) except tendon 51 H26 whose elongation was -11.6%, NCR No. FN604-009 was raised to record this. All tendons were locked off at forces greater than those initially found or above base value whichever was higher, and all liftoffs were within -0% +6%.After completion of all inspections, the anchorage components were hand coated with cold grease to ensure complete coverage, the cans were reinstalled with new gaskets, torqued to the required value, and the necessary amount of sheathing filler (grease) was added. In all cases, the same amount or more grease was added than removed. Results of the grease replacement were recorded on Data Sheets SQ 12.1 and are summarized in Table XII.A greater amount than 5% of the duct volume was added to dome tendons D212 (12.12%), D304(18.3%), D311(19.1%) and horizontal tendons42H30(6.58%) and 421134(5.53%). NCR's FN604-0!8, 019, 020, and 021 were written to record this. All other tendons took an amount less than 5% ofthe tendon duct volume.42 8 qll *l *...C (Florida Power coORPAInON (20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 TABLE XI:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 11.0 TENDON RETENSIONING TENDON END ORIGINAL OBSERVED % ACCEPT LIFTOFF RETENSIONING % ACCEPT ELONGATION ELONGATION VARI. BEFORE VARI._EACH TOTAL, EACH ITOTAL, RETEN. JACK PRESS. L/OFF 61V21 SHOP -12.125 11.3 -6.80 YES 1525 8833 4740 1588 +4.13 YES D304 SHOP -8.125 3.55 7.95 -2.15 YES 1605 8778 4860 1622 +1.06 YES FIELD --4.40 --1591 8833 4837.5 1621 +1.89 YES 621141 SHOP -10.25 4.75 9.40 -8.29 YES 1412 8778 4460 1489 +5.45 YES FIELD --4.65 ---1440 8833 4380 1468 +1.94 YES TENDONS RE-TENSIONED AFTER WIRE REMOVAL TENDON END ORIGINAL OBSERVED % ACCEPT BASE RETENSIONING % ACCEPT ELONGATION ELONGATION VAR]. VARI.EACH TOTAL EACH TOTAL VALUE JACK JPRESS. IIOFFI AVE.421135 SHOP -10.25 4.80 9.80 -4.40 YES 1455 8778 4597 1534 1539 +5.77 YES FIELD --5.00 ----8833 4610 1545 --511126 SHOP -10.75 4.70 9.50 -11.6 NO 1514 8833 4703 1576 1589 +4.59 YES FIELD --4.80 ---8778 4800 1602 --* SEE NCR No. FN604-009 C C 20TII YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIHE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIHE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION TABLE XI:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 11.0 -TENDON RETENSIONING TENDON END LIFTOFF BEFORE RETENSIONING AVERAGE BASE RETENSIONING AVERAGE % ABOVE ACCEPT JACK PRESSURE LIFTOFF LIFTOFF VALUE JACK PRESSURE LIFTOFF LIFTOFF BASE 421129 SHOP 8778 4500 1502 1448 1445 8778 4500 1502 1493 +3.32 YES.FIELD 8833 4160 1394 -8833 4430 1484.5 -421130 SHOP 8778 4355 1454 1389 1469 8778 4560 1522 1520 +3.47 YES FIELD 8833 3950 1324 -8833 4530 1518 -421131 SHOP 8778 4100 1369 1338 1460 8778 4605 1537 1547.5 +5.99 YES FIELD 8833 3900 1307 -8833 4650 1558 -421132 SHOP 8778 4320 1442 1355.5 1452 8778 4540 1515 1506.5 +3.75 YES FIELD 8833 3785 1269 8833 4470 1498 421133 SHOP 8778 4490 1499 1361 1474 8778 4490 1499 1513.5 +2.68 YES FIELD 8833 3650 1223 --8833 4560 1528 -421134 SHOP 8778 4240 1415 1377.5 1452 8778 4520 1509 1512.5 +4.17 YES FIELD 8833 4000 1340 -8833 4525 1516 --421136 SHOP 8778 4490 1499 1408 1503 8778 4700 1569 1572 +4.59 YES FIELD 8833 3930 1317 -8833 4700 1575 421137 SIIOP 8778 4310 1439 1401.5 1452 8778 4570 1525 1521.5 +4.79 YES FIELD 8833 4070 1364 1 I -8833 4530 1518 1 1 C C (20TIi YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIlE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida Power CORPORATION TABLE XI:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 11.0 -TENDON RETENSIONING TENDON END LIFTOFF BEFORE RETENSIONING AVERAGE BASE RETENSIONING AVERAGE % ABOVE ACCEPT JACK PRESSURE LIFTOFF LIFTOFF VALUE JACK PRESSURE LIFTOFF LIFTOFF __BASE 511125 SHOP 8833 4090 1370.5 1363 1401 8833 4250 1425 1442 +2.93 YES FIELD 8778 4060 1355.5 8778 4370 1459 -511127 SHOP 8833 3787 1269 1265.5 1368 8833 4145 1389 1399 +2.27 YES FIELD 8778 3780 1262 --8778 4220 1409 -511128 SHOP 8833 4445 1489.5 1450.5 1518 8833 4645 1557 1563 +2.96 YES FIELD 8778 4230 1412 --8778 47,00 1569 -- 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 0 Florida Power TABLE XII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SHEETS SQ 12.1 GREASE LOSS Vs GREASE REPLACEMENT t TENDON GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED DIFF. NET %SHOP FIELD TOTAL SHOP FIELD TOTAL (GAL.) VOLUME (GAL.) I (GAL.)12VI 2.00 36.75 38.75 40.75 0.75 41.50 +2.75 143.46 1.91 23V2 0.75 9.75 10.50 11.50 0.00 11.50 +1.00 142.52 0.70 61V21 0.75 88.50 89.25 20.25 72.50 92.75 +3.50 144.03 2.43 43V04 0.50 0.00 0.50 7.50 0.00 7.50 +7.00 N/A N/A D113 4.50 4.00 8.50 6.20 3.50 9.70 +1.20 115.11 1.04-D0115 4.50 4.50 9.00 7.00 4.00 11.00 +2.00 117.17 1.71 D212 6.50 4.00 10.50 20.00 4.50 24.50 +14.00 115.55 12.12.D304 12.00 7.25 19.25 38.20 0.00 38.20 +18.95 103.68 18.30'D311 24.00 4.00 28.00 46.50 3.50 50.00 +22.00 115.12 19.104 4 SEE NCR No. FN604-018, 019, 020 o *45

• 20TII YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT dCA UNIT 3 TABLE XII:

SUMMARY

OF DATA SIlEETS SQ 12.1 GREASE LOSS Vs GREASE REPLACEMENT Florida Power CORPORATION '1 TENDON GREASE REMOVED GREASE REPLACED DIFF. NET %SHOP FIELD TOTAL SHOP FIELD TOTAL (GAL.) VOLUME_ (GAL.) _ (GAL.)42H18 3.75 2.00 5.75 5.25 5.25 10.50 +4.75 121.40 3.91 42H29 3.50 3.25 6.75 5.25 6.25 11.50 +4.75 121.48 3.91 42H30 3.00 3.00 6.00 7.00 7.00 14.00 +8.00 121.59 6.58.42H31 2.50 3.00 5.50 5.25 5.75 11.00 +5.50 121.84 4.51 42H32 3.75 2.50 6.25 6.25 4.75 11.00 +4.75 121.36 3.90 42H33 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.25 4.75 11.00 +5.00 120.38 4.15 42H34 3.00 3.00 6.00 6.50 6.25 12.75 +6.75 121.99 5.53 *iR~q t t A A f iAA .[ At 14 z r.31.3.1 .A.,.F..3U 1.I'.,".7v J.3.v hVU.hU LZI.Z/4.v.,---- ---- --_ ------------- .L'"-42H36 4.00 4.00 8.00 4.00 5.75 9.75 +1.75 121.62 1.44.4.1 42H37 4.50 4.50 9.00 6.20 5.00 11.20 +2.20 120.44 1.83 42H44 4.75 3.50 8.25 5.30 4.90 10.20 +1.95 121.08 1.61 51H25 I 3.50 3.50 7.00 8.00 4.50 12.50 +5.50 120.73 4.56 51H25* 3.00 4.00 7.00 4.50 4.00 8.50 +1.50 120.73 1.24 511H26 4.50 3.75 8.25 5.25 4.50 9.75 +1.50 121.43 1.24 51H27 3.50 3.25 6.75 5.30 5.70 11.00 +4.25 121.60 3.50 51H28

• 3.50 4.00 7.50 4.50 4.75 9.25 +1.75 120.46 1.45 51H28* 4.00 4.00 8.00 4.50 4.00 8.50 +0.50 120.46 0.42 53H2 4.50 4.00 8.50 5.75 6.25 12.00 +3.50 121.32 2.88 53H46 3.25 3.50 6.75 6.00 5.25 11.25 +5.25 121.60 4.32 62H41 4.00 4.00 8.00 7.10 5.30 12.40 +4.40 *121.37 3.63 62H46 3.50 4.50 8.00 6.25 6.50 12.75 +4.75 121.11 3.92 51H41 N/A 3.50 3.50 N/A 4.00 4.00 +0.50 N/A N/A GREASED 11/18197 GREASED 12/18/97* SEE NCR No. FN604-021 46

" 20THi YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF THlE a POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT TIlE Florida CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT -Power UNIT 3 coRORAMoN VIII. COMPARISON WITH ORIGINAL INSTALLATION DATA A comparison of the liftoff forces from this surveillance to the original installation lock-off forces is made in an effort to detect any evidence of system degradation. The lock-off forces are compared in order to detect any abnormal force loss which would possibly indicate an underestimation of the creep, shrinkage and/or elastic shortening effects in the Containment Building.Three tendons were excluded from the results due to inconsistencies. Tendons 23V2 and 53112 both reported higher liftoffs now than at installation. Both ofthe original reported lifloffs appear to be lower than the group average at installation,'the horizontal by almost 5%, which could indicate an error in recording the original result. Tendon D304 lost only 12 kips from the original recorded liftoff. In no case were any conditions found that would indicate problems with the wire condition or forces found. These results are not considered detrimental to the structure. Due to these results being inconsistent with the rest of the results they have been omitted from the group averages. The losses for the tendon groups were found to be 9.08% for the vertical tendons, 11.72% for the horizontal tendons and 16.63% for the dome tendons. Despite two of the horizontal tendons being Sbelow the expected base value at liftoff (subsequently retensioned to base -0% +6%) these losses are as expected for a containment of this age and do not indicate any degradation of the system.The following three pages show the graphs of the normalized average liftoffs taken from page 39 for each of the tendon groups. These trend graphs allow a high degree of confidence that the liftoff values will remain above the minimum requirement throughout the next surveillance. I 47 20TH YEAR SURVEILLANCE OF TIHE POST-TENSIONING SYSTEM AT THE CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 3 Florida S~Power ep..304CORPOR~ATION TABLE XIII: COMPARISON OF ORIGINAL LOCKOFF FORCES TO AS FOUND FORCES TENDON LIFTOFF FORCE LOSS PERCENTAGE AVERAGE ORIGINAL @ 20 YEARS (kips) % _PERCENTAGE 12VI 1675 1471 204 12.18 23V2 1598 1609 +11* 9.08 61V21 1622 1525 97 5.98 D113 1676 1427 249 14.86 Dl15 1700 1380 320 18.82 D212 1600 1335 265 16.56 16.63 D304 1610 1598 12*D311 1682 1408 274 1629 421118 1664 1476 188 11.30 421132 1626 1356* 270 16.61 42H44 1605 1472 133 8.29 51H26 1661 1320 ** 341 20.53 11.72 53H2 1555 1611 +56*53H46 1628 1560 68 4.18 621141 1609 1426 183 11.37 621146 1645 1485 160 9.73 t* REMOVED FROM THE AVERAGES DUE TO INCONSISTENCIES. 48 S -- 4.C ((Page 1 of 3)LME HISTORICAL TRENDS DOME TENDONS FPC -Cry=Iat RivWr Unit #3 Tendon Surveillance Program Dome Group Trend of Los2es MUE AFTER AVERAGE DATE I 06000 Aq. An rate". In S~ku.OoUE PLACME4T (YARS)10 OF CONCRETE 1- 400.9 130-1100 SP-182 (Total Rewrite)>>rn<.r./m a 8 t to to 21 30 35 41 SCWEDULIED PERIOD (YEADS AFTER SfT)Rev. 13 Page 92 201 do C W(O (C C ENCO (Fage f3 TEN-ON HISTORICAL TE FIPC -Cryatol River Unit J3-Tendon Surveillonce Program Vertical Group Trend of Losses 1U£E AFTER AVERAGE AMg Al Vnes Ini Swavv.Mmb DATE OF WALL PLACEMENT (YEARS)10 t Doc 1600 1400 1200 1000*4 S S 3I 4 0 e 1 1 4 11 K ~p s -_ _ -S. -=_ ---M- 7 am"X91~0O goo~I I 9 It IS to as " 3S 4 SCREDMuED 5U. CE PERIOD (YArs AFTER SI SP-182 (Total Rewrite)Rev. 13 Page 93 /-... ...- 4 41.t- a~.4 ~~-4 (7 C ENCLOSU3RE o HISTRICA TRM(Page 3 of 3)TEDNHISTORIALTRND FPC -Crystal River Unit #3 Tendon Surveillance Program -A I Hoop Group Trend of Losses 10W MAW mq= Aw Fame UJE AFr AVERACIE DATE OF CONCREM WALL PLC:::EJNT (YEARs)1 10 84 I-4 wr 0 Pot .> r r. >1 3 a so@t 20 M0 " 46 SCHIDIJLL SURVEJUANCE P-ERIOD 01CARS AF1M SIT)SP-182 (Total Rewrtte)Rev. 13 Page 94 (LAST PANE) INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE AC-XMnLWM Nuclear Engineering office NT61)MAC-240-1511 Telephone

SUBJECT:

Crystal River Unit 3 Ouality Records Transmittal -Analysis/Caeculation TO: Records Management -NR2A The following analysis/calculatlon package Is submitted as the OA Record copy: DOCNO UPC DOCUM T 1r0 MINT -CATIO NUWM M RV. rOrM PMGES WIn' D S 95-0082 3 MX 68 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves 9WOS S WIW KWORDS FOR LAin AYlTRMEVAU Tendon, Surveillance OXRP AEFP CESOR FO IE- UST FWi P RA FRL REA 97-1975 REA 97-2110 ,REA 97-2129 VUSO fWENOOS NAMO5v~o oumrIse D~l T8ie:lE Oi'ET OaF FPC (from Parsons Power) N/A NIA TAG'ART NO0.COMM0ITS JUBAGE R'SMiNCMONS. PROPIEITANY. ETCJ Revision by FPC to Parsons Power calculation (using FPC format).NOTE: Use Tag number only for valid tag numbers (i.e., RCV-8, SWV-34, DCH-99), otherwise; use Part number field (i.e.. CSC14599. AC1459). If more apace Is required, write *See Attachment" and list on separate sheet."FOR RECORDS MANAGEMENT USE ONLY*Quallty Record Transmittal received end Information entered Into SEEK.Entered by: Date (Return copy of Quality Docment Transmittal to NOE Supprt Specialist.) 'U)cc: Nuclear Projects Of MARICGWR/PEERE Return to Sernice RelaledI) E Yes 0 No Supervisor. Conflg. Mgt. Inlo.Mgr.. Nucl. Operatio.m Eng. lOriginan) wlettach Calculation Review form Part III actions roquird No (Of Yes, send copy of the form to Nuclear Regutalor Astsurance and a copy of the Calculation to the Responsible Organizatlonls) Identified in Pert Ofi on the Calculatlon Review form.1 Pew. 12197 ,~4m~a=~e ANALYSISICALCULATION

SUMMARY

AC-UJmM3 DOCUMMT IDEWTIaiCATION W E FI s 95-0082 3 C1ASS3MBCATION KS(! ONOI[ Safety Related 0 Non Safety Related 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves Wm N/A VENMMOR DOCUN UM.M NIA APPROVAL PRINTED SIGNATURES NAME Design Engineer John D. Shubert. Jr.Date Verification Engineer1A Lc Date A__._ __._ _ __,_Supervisor -Dan Jopling Date -/ j\ ,'I" Ms ARMVISE)(see 'Revision Description She"' for revision 31 Determine Tendon Force losses and prepare Tendon Force Curves for additional Tendons required J for the 6th Surveillance Inspection. The data for the following Tendon's Is added by Revision 3: Dll, D302. D306. 42H29. 421130, 42H34, 42H35, 421368,42H37, 51H28e 51H29, 62139, 62H43 and 62-44.diSULTS SUMMiAR Additional Force Curves are plotted and attached. 4...SeAI... CALCULATION REVIEW cunVJmm Page 1 of 2 S 95-0082 Revision 3 PART I- DESIGN ASSUMPTION/INPUT REVIEW: APPUCABLE [] Yes 0 No The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the design assumptions and Inputs Identified for this calculation: Nuclear Plant Technical Support MIA System Engr t~uw*Vm Nuclear Plant Operations 0OTHtMU N/A N/A&qNIA PART II -RESULTS REVIEW: APPUCABLE [] Yes 0 No The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the results of this calculation and understand the actions which the organizations must take to Implement the results.Nuclear Plant Technical Support System Engr Nuclear Plant Operations Nuclear Plant Maintenance Q Yes [ N/A Nuclear Ucensed Operator Training NIA vgwmummmai S~N/uA~l D Yes 0 N/A Manager. Site Nuclear Services-Yes t@ N/A Sr. Radiation Protection Engineer[] Yeas NIA Nuclear Plant EOP Group[I Yes 0 NIA>5 OTHERS: N/A fty. 12197 CDJ.CAATIOtd NOAMEV.CALCULATION REVIEW Page 2 of 2 1 S 9"-0082 Revision 3 PART IIl- CONFIGURATION CONTROL: APPUCABLE [] Yes 0 No The following Is a list of Plant proceduresflesson plans/other documents and Nuclear Engineering calculations which require updating based on calculation results review: Document Date Required Responsible Organizetion m Upon completion, forward a copy to the Manager, Nuclear Regulatory Assurance Group for tracking of actions Nf_ any Items are Identified In Part III. If calculations are listed, a copy shall be sent to the original file and the calculation log updated to reflect this Impact.PART IV -NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DOCUMENTATION REVIEW The responsible Design Engineer must thoroughly review the below listed documents to assess if the calculation requires revision to these documents. If "Yes.' the change authorizations must be listed below and Issued concurrently with the calculation. Enhanced Design Basis Document " Yes No UrCA Vendor Oualiflcation Packaegae Yes 0 NoIV/Pa)FSAR ID Yes 19 No 9Mt~6 Topical Design Basis Doc. [0 Yes 0 No flCi Improved Tech. Specification 03 Yes Ig No f5,w' EISOPM 03 Yea M No M(TCi Improved Tech. Spec. Bases [3 Yes 0 No Uawf) Other Documents reviewed: Config. Mgmt. Info. System 03 Yes 0 No C 0 Yes Qs No e I ~(aMMO. DOC. im~tmmNCO Analysis Basis Document I( Yes 0 No EVC,) _"_ Yes r _ _ No_ni .*iCHMIDC ~ N Design Basis Document C] Yes 0& No (TCA) 0 Yes [0 No{A~MGI DCC. MMNfJC8K Appendix R Fire Study 13 Yes 0 No nC¢ 0 Yes [3 No 4;CaMM4 IIIM/ENCm Fire Hazardous Analysis E3 Yes 19 No PcO 03 Yes 03 No (aWEmGII DOC. Mlf (OF~CSI iF A Code Carnce Document 03 Yes [ No (Ic [] Yes [0 No___________ tCAAIOU SOC. UhlMJNC8U PART V -PLANT REVIEWS/APPROVALS FOR INSTRUMENT SETPOINT CHANGE PRC/DNPO approval is required If a setpoint is to be physically changed In the plant through the NEP 213 process.PRC Review Required Q Yes 0 No NIA PRC Chairman /Data N/A DNPO /Date/ DNPO Review Required r Yes 0 No DaS" VMINIDATE OIf.SJGN t4NEER -PWWNTED NAME John D. Shubert. Jr.I

• M CALCULATION VERIFICATION REPORT Crystal River Unit 3 CALEWYMPM Page 1 of 1 iCALCULATION W"MBIR S 95-0082 Revision 3 86th Tendon Surveillance

-Generation of Tendon Force Curves YES NO NIA 1. X [3 [ Are Inputs, Including codes, standards, regulatory requirements, procedures, data. and Engineering methodology correctly selected and applied?2. [3 Q Have assumptions been Identified? Are they reasonable and Justified? (See NEP 101, V.c, for discussion on references).

3. 0 0 Q Are references properiy Identified, correct, end complete? (See NEP 101, V.c., for discussion on assumptions and justification.)

4. 0[1 [3 Have applicable construction and operating experiences been considered?

5.', 0 [3 Was an appropriate Design Analysis/Calculation method used?6. Q [3 In cases where computer software was used, has the program been verified or reverified in accordance with NEP 136 for safety related design applications and/or are Inputs, formulas, and outputs associated with spreadsheets accurate?Y~ 7. 0 0 Is the output reasonable compared to Inputs?8. [ 3 Has technical design Information provided via letter. REA, IOC or telecon by other disciplines or programs been verified by that.discipline or program?9. 0 0 Has technical design Information provided via letter or telecon from an external Engineering Organization or vendor been confirmed and accepted by FPC?10. E] Do the calculation results indicate a non-conforming condition exists? If 'Yes,* immediately notify the responsible Supervisor.

11. El ] 0 Do the results require a change to other Engineering documents?

If "Yes," have these documents been identified for revision on the Calculation Review Form?I have performed a verification on the subject calculation package and find the results acceptable. VERIFICAK O DATI BUCATS-A~/ OA$/` ,Florda'Power COb WO A a I3 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE A-CxMRlJrVJ Nuclear Engineering Office fN~j NT6D MAC 240-1511 Telephone SUBJECT- Crystal River Unit 3 Quality Document Transmittal -Analysis/Calculation TO: Records Management -NR2A The following analysis/calculation package is submitted as the OA Record copv: D V DYS M TOTAL PACESTPANSMT710 S 95-0082I 2 MX 153 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves KWWS IOIMY MWO F0R LAT1 1.1VIVoMJ Tendon, Surveillance D0mET UIW!ThES PIES .IST PiL2 ERST)VV0 WVifll" Ma vl!I=N DOCUMfT. ""ER (OXPEPI SUPEMSEDED 0oCoIDnTS (DXRE FPC (from Parsons Power) N/A NIA TAG COUMINTS RSAGE REITRCTION2. PpRIWTAny. ETCJ Revision by FPC to Parsons Power calculation (using FPC format)NOTE: Use Tag number only for valid tag numbers (i.e., RCV-8, SWV-34, DCH-99). otherwise; use Part number field (i.e., CSC14599. AC1459). If more space is required, write "See Attachmento and list on separate sheet. .0-t.(W, 1! ý tE I.. f k DATE Ir ot VATE Lppv4s* AR'9 --1541 .U-Pil 11,4.1 -L DATEý- 2 -?,- 91.)cc: Nuclear Projects (If MARICGWR/PEERE Retwn to Service Related) -Yes 0 No Supervisor. Config. Mgt. Into.Mgt., Nucl. Operations Eng. fOriginall wlattach CelU1ltlon Review form Par Ila e n 7 Yes [ No (If Yes, send copy of the form I Nuclar egulatory and a COPY of the Calculation to the Responsible Orgunlz@tlon(sl Identified In Port III on the Calculation Review form.)IeN. 3197 1-)VOCUMEHT IDWNIFICATION NUMBER ANALYSISICALCULATION

SUMMARY

AMt, n ICwRNM~ O 9 5-0082 , K-"YLE.M S 2 TriLE CUA I'WOT OC-ECK 0N 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves 0 saf1ty Q Non Safety Related MARWAOGWMEIRE NUMBM n/a VUDON OCUMENTI APPROVAL PRINTED SIGNATURES NAME Design Engineer "' I John D. Shubert, Jr.Date __ __._ts__i_ Verification Engineer _.a ,p-tmt.1CxzM 4 Date °t-7--arl ^)Supervisor ___________1__________ Date.9 rIEMS P1V15E0 (see aRevisfon Description Sheet' for revision 2)OSE.

SUMMARY

Determine Tendon Force losses and prepare Tendon Force Curves for Tendons for 6th Surveillance Inspection. RESULIS

SUMMARY

Force Curves are plotted and attached.)a... SA1 Eladda'WEP.W...e.r. CALCULATION REVIEW CDACEViJM CDLCU.A11ON NOJ~EV.Page 1 of 2 S 95-0082 Revision 2 I PART I -DESIGN ASSUMPTION/INPUT REVIEW: APPLICABLE [Q Yes JR No The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the design assumptions and inputs Identified for this calculation: Nuclear Plant Technical Support System Engr Nuclear Plant Operations OTIEIMM 6qnni~a~.PART II -RESULTS REVIEW: APPLICABLE [] Yes 0 No The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the results of this calculation and understand the actions which the organizations must take to implement the results.Nuclear Plant Technical Support System Engr Nuclear Plant Operations Nuclear Plant Maintenance [o Yes Q3 N/A Nuclear Licensed Operator Training 13 Yes ON/A Manager. Site Nuclear Services 0 Yes [I N/A Sr. Radiation Protection Engineer 0 Yes 0 N/A OTHERS: owwMaefte 51"IUtMVAt slwwNbuf 6.gnawNdD.W )R", ,? L.i CAMWUTION HOJREV.CALCULATION REVIEW Page 2 of 2 I.~S 95-0082 Revision 2 .i PART III -CONFIGURATION CONTROL- APPLICABLE 0 Yes [] No The following Is a list of Plant procedures/lesson plans/other documents and Nuclear Engineering calculations which require updating based on calculation results review: Document Date Reauired Responsible Ornanization SP-182 11-1-97 Nuclear Engineering Programs I Upon completion, forward a copy to the Manager. Nuclear Regulatory Assurance Group for tracking of actions if any Items are Identified In Part Ill. If calculations are listed, a copy shall be sent to the original file and the ,_,calculation log updated to reflect this Impact.PART IV -NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DOCUMENTATION REVIEW The responsible Design Engineer must thoroughly review the below listed documents to assess if the calculation requires revision to these documents. If "Yes," the change authorizations must be listed below and Issued concurrently with the calculation. Enhanced Design Basis Document '1 Yes 0 No rTc' Vendor Qualification Package MGMOPA FSAR [3 Yes 0 No &~I0M1 Topical Design Basils Do. ryes Y* NofICf)improved Tech. Specification (3 Yes E2 No 9,40) EMSOPM [3 Yes 0 No rTCh)Improved Tech. Spec. Bases r3 Yes 0 No I0-0 Other Documents reviewed: Config. Mgmt. info. System 0l Yes 0[ No Ioxwl ._ _ Yes 0 No...WANU DOC. tmZco Analysis Basis Document [3 Yes 0 No fTCJI 0 Yes E3 No ,o, 00C. mwaCo Design Basis Document 0 Yes M No (T") _ _ _ _ Yes E3 No 4CW,. DCC. NMFIMNC Appendx R Fire Stud 1 Yes 0 No Ic~n _-_ Yes El No IM DWC. Fro Hazrdous Analysis E Yes N No ITcff [0 Yes [3 No WFPA Code Conformance Docurenrt [ Yes 10 No MRc __ _ Yes E3 NoG________________ ICH"MV¢r r4FMCfJ PART V -PLANT REVIEWSIAPPROVALS FOR INSTRUMENT SETPOINT CHANGE PRC/DNPO approval Is required If a setpoint Is to be physically changed In the plant through the NEP 213 process.PRC Review Required 9 Yes 10 No DNPO Review Required 0 Yes PftC Chairman /Date ONPO loate 0 No-I DISEW.INl IR -PRWINTO NAME 17-1-T, John D. Shubert. Jr.I Rev. 847 g*spum Ala.CALCULATION VERIFICATION REPORT Crystal River Unit 3 CALWMP^M Page I of 1 I CALCULATION tJUMMI r PRWJECI!TWE S 95-0082 Revision 2 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves I I!YES NO NIA YES NO N/AD0 2.4 0 00 0 4.6.6.~001 0 0 o0 0 Are inputs, Including codes, standards, regulatory requirements, procedures. date, and Engineering methodology correctly selected and applied?Have assumptions been Identified? Are they reasonable and justified? (See NEP 101, V.c, for discussion on references). Are references properly Identified, correct, and complete? (See NEP 101, V.c., for discussion on assumptions and justification.) Have applicable construction and operating experiences been considered? Was an appropriate Design AnalysislCalculation method used?In cases where computer software was used, has the program been verified or reverified in accordance with NEP 135 for safety related design applications and/or are inputs, formulas, end outputs associated with spreadsheets accurate?Is the output reasonable compared to inputs?Has technical design information provided via letter. REA, IOC or telecon by other disciplines or programs been verified by that discipline or program?Has technical design Information provided via letter or telecon from an external Engineering Organization or vendor been confirmed and accepted by FPC?Do the calculation results Indicate a non-conforming condition exists? If "Yes," Immediately notify the responsible Supervisor. Do the results require a change to other Engineering documents? If "Yes,w have these documents been Identified for revision on the Calculation Review Form?8. 0 01 9. 0 0 11.0 t r0 I have performed a verification on the subject calculation package and find the results acceptable. ION VNGINEER DATES$UP $IJCLEARNGM13MG DATE P". 3/97 9NrT:-OPOMW lA$1I.IClSI~lWI, 912247 IM 19 U INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Florida Power COR fP ON A" ION Nuclear Engineering Dcsia.n Office NA!E 240-3568 MAC Telephono sugMCr: Crystal River Unit 3 Quality Document Transmittal -Analysls/Calculatlon TO: Records Management -NR2A I)"he following analysis/calculailon package is submitted as the QA Record copy: DOCNO fFPC DOCUMNu T AIo4 IuMU [l F. WS, Mp TOTAL PAGES TRIAMM S-95-00821 MX ..51W f6t Tendon SurveUlance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves 3 KWa MOEMY K FO -oR UTTER FMVM)Tendon Surveillance =iMMcV CM FM -LIU FPUAY PFU FIr SP-182 VLM a om M0VV NOON #MS TWMEE 8OLW "&Fb FPC (from Parsons Power) NIA NIA TAG COMkt4TS (OWSE RESTIVCTIONS. PAOPFIETARY, ETI Parsons Power caic revision using FPC format.NOTLM Use Tag number only for valid tag numbers (I..,RCV-8, SWV-34, DClI-99), otherwise; use Pan number field (i.e.,CSC14599, AC1459)." If more space is required, write *See Attachment" and list on separate sheet.EMI U0NGIEER DAIl I TERECATON &I(OMNER A DATE A-.h~~3-?)%IOffice (1M Rom~eost 13u ye No"1 ot. Nud. Confmg. Mgt Mgr., Nucl, Eng. Design (Orilinal) wlaflach Plant Dooument Updates !1 Yes ý,Yo at Yjind copy of M,, Calculation Review form to Nuclesar Lcensing and a copy of the Calculatlon to tve Sopo'ah Otgulzon(4 Identfed in Pa i an toe Caulcjon Review fam)NE 13Y.. ENo (If yes. Transmft w/attach)AW 6" nw SRS IVFWN. .9 PMsF IF Wuchi'b Wqk.m~ Florida Powerho ANALYSIS/CALCULATION

SUMMARY

,,mFK "m .-, LVE DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER STRUCTURAL 

-S-95-0082 lCuUlW.A8IWTAflO1HN O a Safety Related PREPARATION 01 TENDON FORCE CURVES FOR 6TH TENDON Q3 Ron Safety Reloead SURVEILLANCE INSPECTION REVISION MS REVISED_APPROVALS Design Engineer L Date Verification Engineer _ _ _ __._ _._ _ __.... ... .Date/Method* 7- Z/s, ....Superisor._ _.__....___.._ Date 10 r.I6. 1- _*VERIFICAION METHODS: Design Review, A -AJtemate Calculation T -Oualiflcatlon TestinO 0ICRIS, BELOW OF METhOQ OF WER4FICATION WAS OTHER TH1AN OESIGN REVIEW DETERMINE TENDON FORCE LOSSES AND PREPARE TENDON FORCE CURVES FOR TENDOISFOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE INSPECTION KMLTS UWAWR I FORCE CURVES ARE PLOTTED AND ATTACHED K /9)r~m. Gin RM Lft of Pwo MW *A1w A 06 1 q PARSONS POWER GROUP INC. , ,:.r.inaron c4 Gl.be-tConmoq'.-.a In ano Parsons Man'175 "1,viantrranln Road Rfeao.n9 PA1 7e, -O1,0; 835.2000 -Fax. t610 855-2001 February It, 1997 FCS-14771 Contract N00821AD, WA048 Mr. W. W. Nisula Contract Manager Florida Power Corporation (NAIB)15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River, FL 34428M6708 Attention: Mr. J. Lese Re: Crystal River Unit 3 6th Tendon Surveillance Force Curve Calculation \-)

Dear Mr. Nisula:

Please frind attached calculation S-95-0082 Revision 1, which documents the generation of the tendon force curve.is tO aVtwnh~idtc ihe 1 )1C lMoJ.tJ inspection date of early March 1997.Included are disks with related electronic files used in the preparation of the data and force curves.Should there be any questions please feel free to contact Dr. Samir Serhan at (610) 855-3209.Very truly yours, Samlr J. Serhan, Ph.D., P.E.Supervising Engineer Roy W. Adler Project Manager RWAISJSIbmb Attachment cc: W. W. NLul3 (NAIB)D. L Jopling (NAIE)J. A. Lese (NAIE)R. E. Vaughn FPC Records Management (CL Only)R. W. Adler(2)P. 1. Hamilton S. 3. Serhan I E PARSONS Florida Power COMPORAKION INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Nuclear Engineering Office NAlE 240-3568 MAC Telephone Crystal River Unit 3 Quality Document Transmittal -Analysis/Calculation TO: Records Management -NR2A)The following analysIs/calculation package Is submitted as the QA Record copy: S-95-0082 0 MiX 383 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves KWMI OCNI1Y I~WOIFV POM LAWE1 WAL)4 Tendon Surveillance D0fF OR FM -UUt PMWAR PU FPE M VEtO KVEOA NAkdc VEOMn OJMENT NU.5 0 I M9MEEO0GUU9 PwI~n FPC (from Parsons Power) NuA N/A TAG PART NO.MM AMI A P EMONTON, 9TC-J Force Curves for 6th Tendon Survetiillance NOTE: Use Tag number only for valid tag numbers (i.e., RCV-8, SWV-34, DCH-99), otherwise; use Part number field (i.e., CSC14599. AC1459). If more space h required, write See Attachment" and~ list Mrate4 slect.PA, Office (f MAR Relatedo 1I Yeo 9 No Plant Document Updates Required 3 Yes 0 No (1f Ye)Aend colý ofthe Mgr. Nuct Config. Mgt. Calculation Review forn to Nuclear Uceneing and a copy W the Calculation to Mgr., NucL Eng. Deaign the Poimnle OW& (o@ Idleidn h PsU i onhe t Clcuaion PeAwmi (Orlg"ln wlaftach NE 13 Yes I No (f yea. Tansmilt m,,Nm CALCULATION REVIEW Page 1 of 2 IC.AA5N.MNO fJJUV.S-95-0082/Rcvision

1. 0 PARTI -DESIGN ASSUMPTION/INPUTREVIEW The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the design assumptions and Inputs Idcntified for this calculation:

e I Nuclear Plant Technical Support System Engr Nuclear Plant Operations ontt'n PART !1 -RESULTS REVIEW The following organizations have reviewed and r cocr ,with the results of this calculation and understand the actions which the organizations must take to implement the results.Nuclear Plant Technical Support System OIA.Engr Nuclear Plant Operations Nuclear Plant Maintenance Q1Yes IXJ NIA Nuclcar Uccmcd Operaor Training-Yes l N/A Manager, Site Nuclear Services o Yes IZJ N/A Sr. Radiation Protection Engineer O Yes I] NIA OTHERS:-F a- 0/A U-a-mb U-mb SIg~'~m YE1r Lie o~f lW NWI. d..e Enlwmpa" CALCULATION'REVIEW P Page 2 of 2 S-95.0082/Revision

1. 0 PART M -CONFIGURATIONCONTOL The following is a list of Nuclear Engineering and Plant procedures/lesson planslotber documents which require updating based on calculation mults review: Document Date RMuired Resnonsible Organization SP-182)3/1/98 Nuclear Engineering Design (A. Petrowsky)

Upon 0"pnCkon, forward a COpy to the MMager, Nucle IJeemW ig for traking of ctonM iffauy items are Idetified In Pt IIL PARTLY -PLAKrREVIEWS/APPROVALS FOR FIELDSIFPOINT CHANGE PRC review Is required if a full IOCFRSO.59 Safety Evaluation is performed. DNPO approval is required if a setpoint is to be physically changed In the plant.PRC Review Required Q Yes F5 No PRC Cbhakmn 100t4 DNPO Review Required [ Yes No DNPO /Date DEON7 4 M ~K;(J Pý &4M~M': IM. o PRam NO Enuahom na AdffAlk Eladds 9=ANALYSIS/CALCULATION

SUMMARY

)mLE AU11CnAT8 pWlclCWCK0i# Cuxvcj. SdaVWde OR SP- 9,2. ___,__ KAMEN DU~0I !1IQ V lii V7*L 1.ffti L9- *-- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __i Deig *J M nAl nl ,do *_-___ ____-m rATmON IETnOo " Design I9"ew -A AlPtrmatm CuicutaWf T -OuaIflcaton Totno:M&AAA/ 4 ZAtl 22MAW/ 6A*EGP..(dtL 7IA~fx f!*.tl._ 7 7h, sj -77WO aj&.M WW.W*7~t.Cc ', ,a A -dM l_, f ,,OAL ...cSi im i A'C ArfA y)I PiA. e/m =raOOu DESIGN ANALYSIS/CALCULATION Crystal River Unit 3 VE&A.C.Me)Page 1 S-950082 3 Revision No.: 3 This page followed by page LA The follow in Items have been revised in the current revision: Revised I Affected Add Replace Remove Description/Purpose of Revision Payes [Sections I I 1 x add *Revision Description Sheet" for revision 3 change page number on revision 2 "Revision X Description Sheet" from page 1 to page 1A and State that 'page 1 follows" change page number on revision 1 "Revision le X Description Sheet" from page JA to page 10 and.state that "page iC follows" change page number of Table of Contents from page 1C X 13 to page IC and add item for Revision 3 Description Sheet change data Input tile names to correspond to 11 X. current names (i.e. DCNER3.XLWI etc) and add note change data Input file name to correspond to 20 X current name (DOWIR3.XLW), add data for Tendons__ ___Dill. D302, 0306 and state that "page 20A follows" 20A-20B X add spreadsheet and curve for Tendon Dill 49 X state that "page 49A follows" 49A-498 X add spreadsheet and curve for Tendon D302 55 X state that "page SSA follows" S"SA-SSB X add spreadsheet and curve for Tendon 0306 change data input file name to correspond to 63-64 X current name (HOOPER3.XLW) and add data for Tendons 42H29. 42H30, 42H34 thru 42137. 51H28. S2H29.62H39. 62H43 and 62H44 70 X state that "page 70A follows" JOA-700 X add spreadsheets and curves for Tendons 421129 and 42H30 76 X state that "page 16A follows" 76A-7611 X add spreadsheets and curves for Tendons 42H434 thru 42H37 94 X state that "page 94A follows" 94A-940 x add spreadsheets and curves for Tendons 511H28 and_5129 112 X state that "page 11ZA follows" 112A-13ZB X add spreadsheet and curve for Tendon 62H39 113 X state that "page LI1A follows" ISA-118D X add spreadsheets and curves for Tendons 62t143 and 62044 159 X Include "Original Stresses data" for Tendons D111, D302 and 0306 and change data Input file name to correspond to current name (DOMER3.XLW) 160 X Include "Original Stresses data" for Tendons 42HZ29.42030, 42H34 thru 42137, 51H28, 52H29. 62H39, 62H43 and 62H44 and change data Input file name to correspond to current name (IIOOPER3.XLW) 894-B010 X add Tendon History Sheets for Tendons DILI, D302.0306. 421129. 42H30. 42H34 thru 42H37, 5128, 52H29, 62H39. 621143 and 621144 K2 X change data Input names to correspond to current names (i.e. OOKER3.XLW, etc...) and add note REVISION TYPE' .Superseded by Calculation Number (check one) [3 Full Revision 0 Page for Page"s~l Itrs: Uk of PntW MESr,. MWOw Ef.gew," MRoda wPower DESIGN ANALYSIS/CALCULATION Crystal River Unit 3 OuS&CJ!I Page iA.i ,=~f0 N W C ~ O O S 9 ~ 8 ,.at ,v a --=Revision No.: 2 This page followed by page 1.L The following items have been revised in the current revision: Revised AffeCtSd Add Replace Remove Description/PurPose of Revision Pages] Sectionsl e -1 x add "Revision Description Sheet' for revision 2! (Change page "number on revision I "Revision 1A X Description Sheeto from page 1 to page 1A and state thaT "eaoe ta follows" lchange page number of Table of"-Cont'ents from page 1B X 1A to page 18 and add Item for Revision 2 aescrtdteon fSheoe p 3 ...x" change start date froml Spring 1.99? to Fall 1997 8 -X Change Start date from Spring 1997 to Fail 1997-Change reference to Enclosure 30.to 3uS% state 9 X Original Stressing Data'-.-.change start date from March 199? to November 1997 10 x and change numerical values to correspond to November 1997 change data Input file names to correspond to 11 X current names (i.e. OCKER2.XLW. etc...)revise the discussion about the interpolation 18 beteen data tn the spreadsheets 20 x change data Inprr file name to correspond to current name (DCNER2.XLW) 21 x revise spreadsheet for November 1997 start date revise spreadsheets and curves for November 199?23-61 X start date 64 X change data Input file name to correspond to current name (400.PERZ.XL. revise and curves for' ovember 1997 65-124 X start date 126 X change data input file name to correspond to current he" sERTRI._M reviSe spreadsheets and curves for November 199?127-156 X start date change reference to Enclosure 30 to 3ust state iS7 1 "Original Stressing Data- and Enclosure 29 to just , _ _state *data sheets" change reference to Enclosure 30 to 3ust state 159-161 X -Original Stressing Data* and change data Input file names to correspond to current names (i.e.____E _.XLW, etc...)change reference to Enclosure 30 to Just state 162 X "Orlginal Stressing Data" and Enclosure 29 to just s State "data sheets-change data input -fle names to correspond to K2 x current names (i.e. DOMERZ.XLW. etc...)M3/REVISION TYPE: (check one)OI Superseded by Calculation Number o Full Revision 0 Page for Page"I$OC- wel of O~WN litso, N.aw I -g '06 " FDESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION FlPower Crystal River Unit 3b,,Page %.C cuuLaoT b-J-I5M-0 ] "0 Calculation 3-95-0082 3 A3 Revision No.: I This page followed by page 1C This shall be used to record the purpose or reason for the revision. indicart the revision pages and/or affected sections and give a short description of the revision. Check (X) the appropriate function to add.r.placc or remove the afiectzsd pages.d Revised Affected Add Replace Remove Description/Purpose of Revision Pages Sections -1 X -- _ Add revision description sheet.LA x Change page number from t to MA. Add icmm for revision description sheet."To change start date for the 6th surveillance ......_ inspection from March 1993 to March 1997 10 X To change start date for the 6th surveillance inspection from March 1993 to March 1997 IS X To change start date for the 6th surveillance inspcction from March 1993 to March 1997 21 X To change start date for the 6th surveillance inspection from March 1993 to March 1997 23-61 X To change start date for the 6th surveillance inspcction from March 1993 to March 1997 65-124 x To change start date for the 6th surveillance ~inspetion from Martch 1998 to Match 1997 127-156 X To change start date for the 6th surveillance 271inspection from Mlarch 1993 to March 1997 A'-I ---_/ l1 -__ -" I I )REVISION TYPE: 1check ow)l I I SUPERSEDED BY CALCULATION NUMBER I I FULL REVISION I X I PAGE FOR PAGE ae? .pq 2 wg4 *dSPh.V , a I-1 I'6 o0ctmENT DE y-A.)Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page IC 1IGA11ON NO. REVIMSN Calculation S-95-0082 3 CTION TITLE PAGE CALCULATION COVER SHEET REVISION #3 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 REVISION #2 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1A REVISION #1 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1B TABLE OF CONTENTS IC 1.0 PURPOSE 3 2.0 DESIGN INPUT 3 3.0 COMPUTER CODES 4 4.0 ASSUMPTIONS 4 5.0 SCOPE AND TENDON SELECTION 4 6.0 CALCULATIONS 9 6.1 GENERAL BACKGROUND & SCHEDULE 9 6.2 FORCE CURVE GENERATION PROCEDURE 11 6.2.1 PREPARATION OF INPUT DATA 11 6.2.2 PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINATION OF TENDON LOSSES 11 6.3 DOME TENDONS 19 TENDONS LISTING & DATA INPUT TABULATION 20 INDIVIDUAL TENDON LOSSES WORKSHEET & CURVES 21 6.4 HOOP TENDONS 62 TENDONS LISTING & DATA INPUT TABULATION 63 INDIVIDUAL TENDON LOSSES WORKSHEETS & CURVES 64 6.5 VERTICAL TENDONS 125 TENDONS LISTING & DATA INPUT TABULATION 126 INDIVIDUAL TENDON LOSSES WORKSHEETS & CURVES 127 6.6 CALCULATIONS SUPPORTING SP-182 157 a-' REt: U. 1 Plaill RgSF~ N~aehuu B~gIn..tina fu" RE1* of hWR9$P'.WW; 9 "Mtlrlgle K DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 2 Calculation 8-95-0082 --7.o SECTION 7.0 8.0 9.0 A.F.C, D.E.F.G.H.L J.X.TIflE CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES ATTACHMENTS DESIGN INPUT FOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE TENDON DATA HISTORY SHEETS FOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE TENDON STRESSING SEQUENCES EFFECTIVE WIRE SUMMARIES AND TENDON WIRE DATA ELASTIC SHORTENING REFERENCES DATA WIRE STRESS RELAXATION REFERENCE DATA CONCRETE CREEP REFERENCE DATA *CONCRETE SHRINKAGE REFERENCE DATA NORMALIZING FACTOR REFERENCE DATA HOOP GROUP PLOT OF TENDONS ELECTRONIC FILES INFORMATION & DISKETTES 162 162 to 163 Al TO AI8 BI TO B92 Cl TO C24 DI TO DIO El TO E9 F1 TO FS G1 TO GI4 HI TO H8 11 TO 123 Ji TO Js Kl TO K3)j mtLidi PIm N. Cm*4'ngrneMU I Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 C M 1Mf I Page 3 DFtm VEMC~InM MQ0 aIEVW Calculation S-95-0082 2 1.0 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE 70e CR3Crs.DoC (Word 6.0)The purpose of this calculation is to provide tcndon force curves for Florida Power Corporation for the Crystal River Unit 3 facility in support of the upcoming 6th tendon surveillance period scheduled for the Fall l of 1997. Specific tasks to be performed as part of this scope include the following: A.) Determine the predicted tendon losses and develop forceltimc curves for cach of the sclected tendons for the upcoming sixth surveillance period. Generate the tendon force curves for the sclected tcndons, the tendons adjacent to the selected tendons, and alternate tendons. Alternate tendons are tendons not specifically scheduled for this surveillance but force curves are prepared to be available in casc a substitute tendon should be required during the survcillance. In addition, force curves for a group of tendons deferred/exempted from the previous surveillance will also be prepared. These are discussed in detail in Section 5.0.B.) In addition to the force curve development, other calculations which are requircd to support Enclosures included within Surveillance Procedure SP-182 will also be prepared within this same calculation.

2.0. DESIGN

INPUT Design input information has been reviewed and is included as Attachment A to this calculation. Note that thre ar no significant changes to the basic criteria and related documentation which address the licensing of the CR3 plant with respcct to the tendon surveillance program. The previous surveillance efforts complcted various studies and addressed the CR3 tendon program and its' compliance with U.S. Regulatory Guide 1.35, Revision 3, since it was formally issued in July 1990. Based on FPC licensing efforts and Technical Specification revisions performed at the time of the last surveillance period, as well as recent discussions with the NRC, FPC has now committed the CR3 tendon surveillance program to be performed in accordance with U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.35, Revision 3 (Reference 3).U.S. Regulatory Guide 1.35.1, Revision 0 (Reference

4) is a daughter document referred to by the above Reg.Guide and deals specifically with the calculation of individual tendon losses and the generation of tendon force curves. While calculation efforts for the CR3 tendon force curves have followed closely with both of these Regulatory Guides as they evolved through the 1970's and 1980's, the format and current procedure for the preparation ofthe force curves is not in exact compliance with Regulatory Guide 1.35.1 Revision 0 as issued in 1990. The method and approach used in the generation of the CR3 force curves is superior to that of the Reg. Guide in that a specific curve is generated for each individual tendon. Based on the discussions held with the NRC and the results of thcir review, the method and approach used for these calculations shall be the same as used for previous surveillances.

Sec the Attachment A information for further discussion and references to recent correspondence and documentation with the NRC on various issues related to the tendon surveillance program.Applicable Technical Specification sections, as well as FSAR sections were also reviewed for this effort.They support the position noted above on the FPC commitment to KG. 1.35, Rev. 3 and are discussed and referenced within the Attachment A information. Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION SPower Crystal River Unit 3 Calculation S-95-0082 o 3.0 COMPUTER CODES This calculation package is being prepared using Microsoft Word, Version 6.0 and Microsoft Excel, Version 5.0. Spreadsheets from earlier surveillance efforts were prepared using Lotus, 123, Release 2.01 and 3.0 and were converted to Excel format for this calculation. All input and calculations are manually checked and verified, thercfore, verification of computer programs is not applicable or necessary.

4.0 ASSUMPTIONS

Any assumptions made are noted and contained within the calculation package. None require future confirmatio.

5.0 SCOPE

AND TENDON SELECTION Tendons were selected for the sixth surveillance period in accordance with the requirements of Reg. Guide 1.35, Revision 3 and using the same methodology as was used in the past surveillance. Basically, a random but representative sample was selected and checked at the site for accessibility. Specific criteria used for this selection process is summarized as follows: 1 Tendon Selection Process The tendon selection process has remained the same as that completed for the last several surveillances where a random but representative sample is selected for inspection and testing. The intent is to get as many new and never tested tendons in the sample population, but still keeping one control tendon from each major t=don group to be investigated in each surveillance. Note that this current method differs from methods used during the early life of the plant where some tendons were repeated for inspection every third surveillance. Basically, the selection criteria and process used considers the following: 1.) Select tendons based on Reg. Guide 1.35 Revision 3 Based on the good results of prior surveillances, the Reg. Guide requires a minimum of I I tendons to be inspected, including 5 hoop, 3 vertical and 3 dome. Tendons should be selected which were never previously inspected or tested. Previously deteusioed and retensioned tendons should not be included (unless there is a specific need to investigate the tendon per item 3 below). In addition to being selected at random, tendon selection should be representative of various areas and conditions. For example, the hoop tendons selection was based on random selection but also considered what tendons were inspected in the past and in what hoop area. A plot of previously inspected hoop tendons was prepared to track tendons inspected by grouping (i.e. 13's. 42's, 35's, 46's. 5 l's, and 62's). Therefore, the selection process considered those sections not equally represented by as many tendons as completed within other sections from prior surveillances. See Attachmcnt J for various plots and information of the hoop group. The same procedure was applied to the dome group (i.e. 100's, 200's & 300's groups) and to the vertical group (i.e. 12's, 23's, 34's, 45's, 56's & 61's & quadrants). See Attachment D for groups information. I. ...-MUT: UI d PNts REUM Nadw EnommuW Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 5 VOC4MEN1 10's ~nO.M NEWdSinO.Calculation S-96-008 a 2.) Maintain Control Tendons to be completed each surveillance. The Reg. Guide also requires a control tendon from each group to be inspected every surveillance for comparative purposes. CR3 has rot had control tendons since the first surveillance. The concept was introduced probably in the fourth surveillance. Tendons D212, 12VI and 5 1H26 were probably the original control tendons since about the time of the fourth surveillance. They were intended to be inspected during the fifth survo'llance but the group of tndons selected was based on the surveillance being performed during an outage. FPC decided to complete the 5th surveillance during normal plant operation and the original tendons selected were affected because many tendons were located within the area of the plant steam vent zone. This included the above three control tendons, and three new control tendons, D215, 34V6 and 461129 were selected for completion of that surveillance. A problem with 461129 during the 5th surveillance forced the selection of another control tendon, 461121, for the hoop group. New control tendons may need to be selected periodically if the tendon has a problem and is ever detensioned and/or retensioned. As earlier surveillances on CR3 did repeat some tendons, the selection of these other control tendons was easily done from several good candidate. New control tendons should be selected from those previously inspected as far back as possible and cannot be one previously detensioned and/or retensioned. A tendon inspected in more than one prior surveillance is preferred. Based on the above, It is recommended that both of the above two sets of control tendons be used by FPC as control tendons, with one set of three to be utilized in the 6th surveilance during a plant outage, and for) the other thre to be used in any frture inspections scheduled to be performed on-line.3.) Consider any tendons with problems or abnormal conditions as reported by plant pcrsonMel. Any leaking tendons or tendons with any reported problems should be considered within the scope of the surveillance. Also, past inspection reports and records should be checked for open items, recommendations, or noted problem tendons.4.) In the selection of tendons for detensionin& (oe per group is required per 1LO.) consider the numfber of effective wires as recorded in the tendon history sheets and summarized in the effctive wire summary in Attachment D to thii calculation. As any tendon is to be considered lneffective if it has less than 155 effective wires per the FSAI, it is therefore not desirable to select a tendon with many missing. cut or ineffective wires. Unless there was a specific need to detension that particular tendon, doing so could therefore render the entire tendon as out of service. Only a maximum of 3 tendons are allowed out of service at one time per criteria in the FSAIL 5.) The reduced force dome tendons are not normal candidates for normal liftoff testing per SP-1 82, Enclosure a.6.) Tendons adjacent to the selected tendon may require testing and should also be feasible to inspect and test.Adjacent tendons in the dome should not include any reduced force dome tendons. Jump to the next regular dome tendon for the required adjacent tendon. Also, adjacent tendons of the lowest hoop tendons (#1) shall be considered as the two'directly above the selected tendon. Adjacent tendons of the highest hoop tendons (fi47) shall be considered as the two directly below the selected tcndon.)7.) One alternate tendon should bc selected from each group, and the two adjacent tendons of these alternates at least considered for possible inclusion. I We: Lf o M"i neaaw. Mckv 0"""~ I I*M. Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 6 OCM EYWCA1MQN NO RE60 Calculation S-95-0082 e In addition to the above selection criteria, there are several other factors which have influenced the scheduling of actual ficld inspection and testing. These include: A.) Steam Vent Zone -Plant steam venting can impose a safety hazard to personnel during plant operation and early modes of shutdown. Tendon work in the range between 0 and 120 degrees Is affected during plant operation by the potential steam venting of the plant. Tendon work in this area must be held off until the potential hazard is eliminated or other approval is obtained from plant operations. Note that for the fifth surveillance per FPC operations, this even includes the outside tendon caps of the affecte butresses at 0 and at 120 degrees.B.) Fuel Pool Area-Work over the fuel pool can only be performed while missile shields are in place. (Nureg 0612 rcqmt.)C.) PlantInteror Work-Work inside some plant areas is difficult due to access problems, high radiation areas, nerences, ram accessibility, etc.Ieferred/ExemDted Tendons After the tendons were selected for the fifth surveillance for an outage survelllance, it was decided that the 5th surveillance would be completed during normal plant operation. A group of tendons originally selected for inspection during that surveillance had to be exempted florn that surveillance due to their proximity to the main steam vent zone and the associated hazards with wowUing in that area. FPC discussed this issue with the NRC and has documented the following 8 tendons as defrred tendons: aim nrr~ LI. d Ph.i ~ M~dmt Eqbwulng Noue edo PlsM Jqe5. Ifce Frsq! eoes Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 1W CONIOMPage 7 Calculation 6.95-0082I o D1 15 Never inspected in any surveillance. D212 Inspected in Surveillance 3 and 4.Considered as Control Tendon for outage condtion.D311 Never inspected in any surveilance. 12VI Previously included for liftoff testing in the 3rd and 4th surveillances. Considered as Control Tendon for outage condition. 421-144 Never inspected in any surveillance. 511126 Previously included for liftoff testing in the 3rd and 4th surveillances. Considered as Control Tendon for outage condition. 53H46 Never inspected in any surveillance. 62H46 Never inspected in any surveillance. As FPC has comnitted to the NRC to address tbe above tendons within the upcoming 6th survelllance, these tendons were considered in the scope of this calculation. The 6th surveillance is scheduled to be completed during an outage. Since three of the above exempted tendons were also previous control tendons, it was considered that these tendons can again be used as control taenons for this surveillance instead of the 3 control tendons used in last surveillance (when the surveillanc was done on-line). Therefbre, the three exempted control tendons can be considered as three of the 11 tendons required per Reg. Guide. A total of 16 tendons should be inspected during the surveillance with three additional alternates selected. Note however that the scope of this calculation will include force curves to be rqgnerated for the other control tendons, D215, 34V6 and 461121.A complete historical record of all tendons included in all prior surveillances, along with the list of selected adjacent, exempted and alternate tendons which are planned for in the 6th surveillance is provided on the following Table.K-,)!m M Er: ife 40 Pleme RUMSP. Mkee EngmIe C-cou TDEIO)I SwcVtLKA)NE I CIIC-ALutmR X4q4 SVVAMLANCZ) P I ST SIVEC.LA)4CE 210 EMV3ELANCK SXD SUMflUANE 4TH StRIEUZAWX 31 fnSIRVUJAWM 47 MIIMUR .ANIC lurawnro"M YWO@TO 51%w *111TO31231 2FIPITOIW117 ZIV"To d L9 FAZLLIWI I~YEARS Al'T0S SIT .*vamilaSclool gri IT TVYAR iSYEARS S WARS II WARS II WARS 21i W-ai .E)*MARZI ATA KE4qU3W TO INSECT It YOT.IGUVY.SD 23 TMQT.IUV.SD 21 TOT.101WSVA I I TOT-SIUV.30 II TOT4MIUV.D

• II TOT-WT3.3O
• .I TO!T-M4VAlD ACIUALJ* D4SPSCITD 23 ZT-)El.V.41) 231071.UI.W.SD 21 1ur.IG~tv.fl2 I I TOT-511,31Jo s4g11)vV.S*

DcL6 IUD va u 33 910TT4)HWV2D 9 BASIS fl-ill) 310-49 SM4in a-in3 M35.3 SP-112 *TOTAL. It sp.)m "1434 PlY- RVVd IEV? 1XVIDAII CC PZIORY DATE 3.2740 & 4801 51" Snwn1 311*11SI DOU1DNOOM Do"? Din Dl23 DIOS ID PIMS P.c *21 Di. CX .22DOMETENIX) IDYTMAL Dill P140 P25 It P112 P.C Vol II *M 024 * ?WECTED SOROWSOV41 Dt 33 un 3 3321 DM U= A Otis .TO DATE Doom 2805.3203 vur 3332 Din D3 Otis It DM23 371331 .Dv itl DIV4 *Dill VUERIAL1OIDOWS IVI? W13Y1 IIVt SVI D.C 74YE P.C 3M IV .CJ u ~VET. WowoH 144TOTAL tr~im 12V210 at "WV R 34W IS 33 .4IV21 33

• DISPEC$GOXMROF24 tivit DIm IdVIt 33 SV3 D3 SIV14 6 2MV TO DATE IZi4.34D3.45.1 IMVS 31MI 4W16I **1vi A 34"4 45V4 5VII 56VI NVI DA£IIONV.WTAv~toD MUGo M12 3109 ~ n a 13112 IlIt I:8101 I.C. -3 awor oS 210 TOTAL 131139 1381,32 13114 131"4 D 42)11
• 42W3
• 2S5£TED o(ROlWS0411OI LullS L3*1 411W0 S1106 a Goal2 am") 42113
• DATZ 11, K It46.11.42 131147 S11110 421140 511111 46112 ADI.? 41144, E STED~ONSKRIl" 511111 S31022 WIN 451139 miug 3.C(II.D #a 62119 5183 131914 46100 ADL *401143 P 48W32 33124 $AD$5 4014? 33 Q% 92i 4800o $31012 ""340 62111
• 33*4601 D ti114" 4"014 ,gU A TOTALTENDON

-50 dams434 461112 441810 33 TUTALINSPEC1W 22 22 21. it 14 i* 16.IAT. 71W TOTAL.0 C2 0t-o.."I.4 S*1 I1WM-A. ALTERNATE AmfADMCEITr CONTRU.L. *EPEMtlVEUSRR3 r21 FIT) SURv. W. 331!ATEP D. DETE*410NW a 171NSmoE%RIUod4o1 I co I Kjj Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 cOAWPRAlPae Page 9 DOCUM 10T MVEN11ICAn N0. AEIMION CalculaUon S-95-0082 2 6.0 CALCULATIONS

6.1 General

Background and Schedule Information General Background Tendon forces curves are to be prepared for the upcoming 6th tendon survcillnce pcriod at CR3. From the basic criteria as presnted in the Design Input Section, as well as from several discussions with Mr. Joc Lese of Florida Power & Light, it was determined that the criteria for this surveillance period has not changed since the last surveillance efforts. A review of Tech Spec and FSAR criteria confirms the FPC positions with respect to the tendon program. Supporting work for this survillance period will be based on the same criteria that was used and accepted in the previous surveillance periods.Tendon losses have been calculated in the past per the Refcrence 9, 9, 10 and I Idocumcntation. Individual tendon losses include the following-" Force loss due to elastic shortening of the containment as a result of the prestressing process and the particular sequcncc of tendon stressing." Force loss due to the stress relaxation of the tendon wires.* Loss of prestress force due to the creep characteristics of the concrete structure. L Loss of prestress force due to the shrinkage of the concrete structure. Based on some earlier calculations made for tendon losses per the Reference 11 document, Lotus spread sheet templates were prepared for tendon losses calculations for the 4th tendon surveillance calculations. See References 9 & 10. These templates were reran and tested for their accuracy and validity for the fifth surveillance. In addition, the procedure for the gathering of all input data was automatcd in the fifth survillance to the format presented herein. Numerous test cases were ran to duplicate force curves prcpared in the past. There were four master templates prepared for the fourth surveillance; one for the hoop tendons, one for the vertical tendons, and two for the dome tendons. The dome tendons are divided into two groups;one for tendons with an original stressing sequence below 27, and the other for tendons with stressing sequences above 27.Based on the work previously accomplished in the prior surveillances, new spreadsheets were prepared this surveillance using Microsoft Excel for the collection of input data and for the calculation of tendon losses needed for generation of force curves. The generation of the force curves was also automated this surveillance by using Excel to plot the graphs. The organization of most data used for this calculation was setup into Excel workbooks with subfiles built and included in each workbook. There is a separate workbook for each of the three tendon groups and each one contains the following:

1. Tabulated input data* Original tendon stressing sequences.

-1 & Eff-ctive wire summaries."Original Stressing Data" calculations for SP-182.o Separate files including each tendon loss spreadsheet, plot data and an individual force curve.Additional information on electronic file names etc. used in this calculation is provided in Attachment K. K 0 Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 10 WoWEPu r wEHWCAWoN IM p-wsC Calculation S-95-0082 2 Schedule Information The expected timing for the sixth surveillance is Fall 1997. A date of November 1, 1997 will be used as a bases for dctermining the predicted values of base, 95% base and 90% base and labeling this information on the force curves. This allows for field usC and decisions to be made based on the requircmcnts of Survcillance Procedure, SP-182.The scales of the force curves are based upon previous survcillance cfforts. Thc x axis is a log scale in timn representing the time after average date of dome or wall concrete placement, in years. This scale is labeled at the top of each curve. Force curves arc plotted using the actual log scale points for the x axis (not the scheduled surveillance years after SIT) versus the calculated tendon forces in kips on the y axis. The scale at the bottom of the curve for scheduled surveillance periods after SIT are for case and rcadability relative to regular scheduled surveillances per Reg. Guidc 1.35, Revision 3.Most of the CR3 surveillances were performed on the regularly scheduled years, however, the 5th surveliance was actually performed in the 17th year after SIT. Note that the containment Structural Integrity Test (SIT)was performed in November 1976.For the dorac tendons force curves, the point on the bottom scale at SIT corresponds to the log scale at the top of 2.5 years. Therefore, a corresponding log scale data point must be determined for curve plotting for the period of the 6th surveillance. Based on a date of November 1. 1997 for the Fall 1997 surveillance, the length of time between November 1976 (@ SIT) and November 1, 1997 is 21 years. Since the dome group at SIT is at year 2.5 on the log scale, the 6th surveillance will correspond to (21.0 + 2.5) or 23.5 years on the log scale.The same procedure must be performed for the hoop and vertical groups as they have different reference points on the log scale for time after concrete wall placement. Both hoop and vertical groups arc the same with SIT corresponding to year 4.4 on the log scale. Therefore, the 6th surveillance period will correspond to (21.0 + 4.4) or 25.4 years on the log scale.A vertical line will be shown on the force curves at the point of the next surveillance and the calculated values of base, 95% base and 90% basc representing points on the curves at that timc will be included on each of the curves.L L 2.RET: Lt PWi m3rFP: ku=bm AFlorida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 11 Calculation S-95-0082 3 6.2 General Procedure for Force Curve Generation The same procedure within the calculation for the preparation of the force curves for the fourth and fifth surveillance pcriods will be followed.6.2.1 Preparation of Data Input Spreadsheets In each of the Excel workbooks is a data input file where data from source calculations and current tendon history sheets has been tabulated. See DOMER.XLW (DOMEINP), HOOPR3.XLW (HOOPINP) &vERTR2.xLW (VERTINP). 'The compiled books of tendon surveillance historical information, as updated to include the results of the fifth surveillance, provide key input data for the dcvelopment of force curves. See References 12, 13 & 14. The selected tendon history sheets related to this surveillance have been included herein as Attachment B of this calculation. The Rcfcrcnce 11 calculation is essentially a source calculation for this procedure with the Refrece 8 & 10 calculations also providing information. Notes and references related to the tabulation of the data on these spreadsheets are shown on the individual sheets. The data input tabulations are presented as the first sheet within the following Sections 6.3, 6.4 & 6.5.6.2.2 Procedure for Determination of Individual Tendon Losses The procedure for the tendon loss calculations, as derived from the reference documentation, is as follows: I.) Calculate original force in the tcndons The original force in the tendons is determined as follows: OC G.R ORCE = 0.7

• F Pressure x FireFactor Where: 4& -240 Ksi, typical for all CR3 wires.Wire area -0.07685 in2 per Appcndix F of the Reference 11 calculation.

F,& (Kip Force)= Tendon Area (in2) x f& (Ksi) -0.05985

• 240 Tendon Area (in2) = Area/Wire (in2) x No. of Wires. (Considered by wire factor.)Actual and prcdictcd original liftoff prcssures are obtained from Tendon History Sheets Refcrences 12, 13,.14, with those within the scope of this calculation attached in Attachment B.Refer to the Appendix F part of the Reference 11 calculation, for source data of above formula. The above expression was used as the basis for the calculations for all the shop and field end forces calculated on the Data Input Spreadsheets.

This procedure docs not apply to retcnsiooed tendons.'U RET Li. ~ Plud KkSP~ Nudest Engww~em tElr: d Ptm RZWP. Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 12 Calculation S-95-0082 Note that the wire factor as shown in the various spreadsheets is a value representing the tabulated number of effective wires over a total of 163. The number of wires is usually 163 unless cut, loose or considered ineffective. The number of effective wires as recorded from the original installation is documented on the tendon history sheets. The number of effective wires for each tendon has been updated, tabulated and presented in the Effective Wires Summary for each individual group within Atacunmnt D. This tabulation was updated to include the results of all previous surveillances. It does not imply each of the tendons was specifically checked for the numbers of effective wires as presented in the table. it represents only data from the original records and as made available from surveillance records and subsequent inspections. Note that the wire factor used is based on current information and is not based on the number of wires at the time of original installation, therefore the original Force calculated may not be the "original force" in the tendon back at that time. The effect of less effetive wires lowers the curve vertically. This is Insignificant at the current time as the curve of interest will be correct for use at this time. Another method would have been to plot the original value using the wire factor then and then to show a step down on the curve should a lower wire factor occur at some point later on the graph.2.) Calculate Elastic Shortening Losses The elastic shortening Losses are a function of the stressing sequence number for the individual tendon. In addition, the tendon wire ftctors an also considered and used. The base expression used to calculate theseis the same as used in previous calculations and is already built into the basic spreadsheet templates. All the equations for elastic shorting were confirmed as being the same as established in prior calculations. Based on the review of the procedure for calculating these losses, it is concluded that the existing templates ame still appropriate and correct with the additional input ofstressing sequence data and wire factors to be input for the current group of tendons for this surveillance. Refcrcnce 10 & Reference 11 data and information on elastic shortening was included in Attachment E to these calculations. See Attachment C for original stressing sequences for all tendons and see the Data Input Worksheets & Attachment D information for tendon wire factors and source data.Elastic Shortening Losses for Dome Tendons Note there are two expressions used for elastic shortening for the dome tendons depending on the stress sequence numbers. For dome tendons in sequences I through 27, the Domelow template is used. For dome tendons in sequences 28 through 32, the Domehigh template is to be used. This is because of the two separate expressions used for the calculation. Elastic Shortening Losses-For Dome Tendons in Sequences I through 27-.j N -27 Total Sequences a -Sequence of particular tendon.6~ NET UU i'w~ R~SP~ IbI~W Mg1n~mg VM1* Imwg.pm~ Oa Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION

• Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 13 GOCUMEW meww"M NO Calculation S-95-0082 Force Loss due to elastic shortening

-Fs.A, =N- ' x 827 +75]xWireFactor Elastic Shortening Losses.For Dome Tendons in Sequences 28 through 32-N -5 (Sequences 28 through 32)n -Sequence number less 27 i.e. for sequece 29, n -I for sequence 29, n = 2 for sequence 30, n -3 for sequence 31, n- 4 for sequence 32, n -S FIes = r[N -n x 47.4 -13.7] x WireFactor The value for elastic shortening in kips declines as the stressing sequence increases. A review of the data for the dome group shows that values for the dome group go from 154.6 kips for sequence I tendons down to 75 kips for sequence 27 tendons, and further going down to -13.7 kips for the last sequence, sequence 32. Note that wi factor differmces between individual tendons will cause the calculated result to vary slightly for two tendons within the same stressing sequence.Elastic Shortening Losses for Hoop Tendons-N -60 Total Sequences n -Sequence ofparticular tendon.Force Loss due to elastic shortening -Fles= [( xN) 134. 0. x WireFactor A review of the data for the hoop tendon group shows that the range of values for the calculated elastic shortening go from 127.3 kips for sequence 3 tendons down to 0 kips for the last tendon sequence, sequence 60.K~P.LE. dPbui ME3~~ I~~w Emgmn.a~ng oer:. L" at PWOv REV, km. N A -4 Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 14 V60jWW "MVAMON NO SR~tWON Calculation S-95-0082 o Elastic Shortening Losses for Vertical Tendons -N 31 Total Sequences n -Sequence of particular tendon.Force Loss due to shortening-Fles= n) X x WireFactor A review of the data for the vertical tendon group shows that the range of values calculated for elastic shortening go frm 71.1 kips for sequene I tendons down to 4.7 kips for sequence 29 tendons. Tbcre are a total of 31 stressing sequences for the vertical tendons.3.) Calculate Wire Stress Relaxation Losses Wire stress relaxation losses and the procedure for the determination of these losses for the 4th and 5th) surveillances are addressed In the Reference 10 and 11 calculations. TMe original wire relaxation curve, as provided by test data from the wire vendor forms the bases for wire relaxation loss values (See also FSAR Figure 5-23). It was determined that the same procedures and figures as calculated in those prior calculations are still applicable for this surveillance. Applicable data from the reference sources was attached and included within this calculation as Attachment F.Note that ther were adjustments made to the original stress relaxation values from the vendor relaxation curve to allow for some conservatism and for temperature consideration of 100 degrees vs. 68 degrees F.Also, per the original design the wire factor or actual number of effective wires was considered as negligible for these losses and was not included. Note that values for stress relaxation range between 40 and 50 kips for the surveillance period for all three tendon groups.4.) Calculate Creep Losses Concrete creep calculations in the Reference I I document are attached in Attachment G. The losses are based on the curve contained in the reference calculation. Creep values are different for each of the three groups of tendons. For the dome tendons in the coming surveillance period, creep values arc the same and are about 152 to 158 kips, hoop values are between 79 and 83 kips, verticals are 36 to 38 kips.5.) Calculate Shrinkage Losses Attachment H contains source information for concrete shrnae from Reference 10, pg. I I and Refteence 11, cover page & Pages 13 & 14. The straight line shrinkage losses in micro inches per inch as calculatod in the above two references arc still applicable for this surveillance period. Tabulated values from these references were input into the dome, hoop and vertical spreadsheets. There are no additional variables or considerations and the same values are to be used for this calculation. From a review of the output information, the dome values are contant at 8 to 9 kips, hoop values are above 5 kips, verticals are also slightly above 5 kips.WEtMO LIM dPb R ESP. t#uem E Vgiu K)K))I Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 1WCWfPOftA?" Page 15 9=A*WCNW NICAUn5M rEV $ON Calculation S-95.0082 6.) Total Losses Calculated force losses for elastic shortening, wire stress relaxatkm, creep and shrinkage arc added for a total of all losses. Also, a percent of this total of all losses is calculated based on the original average force in the tendon.7.) Determine Predicted Forces for Base, 95% Base and 90% Base values The original forcc less the total of losses calculated yields the base predicted value for the subject period of surveillance inspection. The 95% and 90% values are then calculated based on the calculated predicted base value.8.) Normalization Factors Normalization factors arm calculated based on the expressions and the source article contained in Attachment I of this calculation. This factor usually does not change much over the forty year time span of the calculation. The base expression for the dome nonrmization factor value is presented as follows: (A -B) x (I -C) + (D -97.7)Where-.A -Average of all Domes group B -Origina averne tendon force C = Wir Stress Relaxation Percentage D -Elastic Shortening As an example, Dome tendon D 112 calculates as follows: NormallzahonFactor = (163 9 -1676) x (I -0.0257) + (D -97.7) o NF = (-37) x (0.9743) +(-101.9) or NF --138 which matches the spreadsheet calculation. Similar expressions are shown for the hoop and vertical tendons in the information in Attachment I.Wr LDtd Puwft13 " SW.ad&u EaM.. I K A Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATIONz............... Power Crystal River Unit 3 CocTn o~m~rPage 16 Calculation S-95-0082 9.) Plotting of Dam Only the data from Column B, L, M, & N are tabulated on a separate arca on the side of the spreadshcct. See Columns R1 S, T & U; Rows 40 through 50. Only these values are selected for plotting on the force curves.Ths is for case of plotting and has no affect on the quality or accuracy of the plots. An example copy of this data immediately follows the first dome tendon.The plots of all dome curves with all the data points showed the force curve plot line as slightly crooked from a true linear plot. The large scale used showed some inflection points slightly off of linear. After investigation, the condition was avoided by omitting data points at year 10 and 15 after SIT for the final plotted figures. This was done only for presentation purposes and there is no affect on the accuracy of the plot or the base values calculated and presented on each curve.A column by column explanation of the losses calculation worksheet follows: K amMP A"Lfed PWai WESF# WcoErqw*WkW Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Crystal River Unit 3~Page 17 Calculation S-95-0082 0 INDIVIDUALTENDON LOSSES LOSSES CALCULATION WORKSHEET NOTES AND LEGEND Individual tendon losses are calculated based on the procedure presented in the preceding section. The following notes explain the spreadsheet process, input and caculations performed for each of the columns presented. The shaded values on the losses worksheet ar extracted frora the data input worksheet. Column" ROWRIMn A. Inspection Period after SIT Scale based on years after SIT which is shown on the bottom scale of each individual plot. Nowe that this information is providcd for easier readability with respect to SIT but is not the actual log scale used to construct the x axis of the plots.B. Years after Concrete Placement Scale ofyears after concrete placement as used for the x axis for plotting of the force curves and shown as the upper log scale at the top of each plot.. Note that one year after SIT for the dome tendons is 3.5 years on the log scale and for the hoop and vertical taxions is 5.4 ycars. See Section 6.1 of this calculation for further information. C. Elastic Shortening Calculated based on formulas presented in Section 622 and Attachment E information. D. Stress Relaxation Percent Calculated based on original wire loss curve percentages modified per the information presented in Attaclhmet F of this calculation. F. Stress Relaxation Forces Data input from the Reference 11 calculation page 12. See Attachment F.F. Creep Strain Strain value (x 0.000 IData input from the Reference 11 calculation. See Attacuncnt G of this calculation for data.G. Creep Strain Force Data input from the Reference I I calculation. See Attachment G of this calculation for data.H. Shrinage Values Data input from the Reference I I calculation based on the shrinkage curve. See Attachment H of this calculation for data.1. Shrinkage Force Data input from the Reference 11 calculation. See Attachment H of this calculation for data.i " I M." f-A JP -h Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page I1B D EEN.MaAT" NO.Calculation ,%95-0082 2 1. Total Force Lass Calculated value, Sum of columns C. E, GA 1 K Total Percent Loss Total loss in percentage, Column J / Average of original forces for shop & field ends calculated and shown above on the sprcadshcet. L. Base TMw average original force for thc tendon noted above on the spreadsheet, less the total losses calculated in Column J. Note that total losses were not calculated on t row for the 17 year period, the 21 year 3 month period, as well as the 21 year period after SIT. These rows represent the fifth, the originally planned sixth and the current sixth surveillance periods and the values of Base were derived through linear intrpolation of above and below data prescnted on the sprmadsh=t. The quality and accuracy is not affected by this procedure. M. 95% Base 0.95 x Column L for thc same row.N. 90% Base 0.90 x Column L for the same row.0. Nonralization Factor -Calculated based on formula presented in this calculation and in the information presented in Attachment I.l'Mkh CA Ph"e RE IP,P Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 cofPo. Page 158 Calculation S-95-0082 KJ Column H & I Calculated force values in Kips which represcnt ram pressure 1500 psi. These forces represent a zero slack starting point for both shop and field ends of each tendon and provide a basis for the start of any retensioning effort. The following expression is used to calculate these values: 0.7 0 Tendon Ultimate Strength ' 1500 1 Predicted lift-Off Prcssure at 0.7 Tendon Ultimate Stren't. See Reference 10 Calculation, page 34.Calculated force values in Kips which represent forces at 80% ultimate based on the following expression: (Actual pressure @ 80% ultimate strength (Columns F or G)

• 0.7 Tendon Ultimate Strength)

I Predicted pressure @ 70% Utimate Strength.Column J & K Column L & M Actual elongation data, repeated from colnums 1 and C.)In additoa, the following calculations support the ultimate strength values provided on these spreadsheets: Tendon wire ultimate strength Gfa for wire -240 ksi Tendon Ulima Strength = Fg -f, for wire 0 Tendon wire area]-240 ksi ' (0.05985

• 163 wires) , 2341.3 Kips 0.7
• Fw, -0.710234.3

= 1639.9 Kips 0.8

• F,* -0.8 02341.3 -1873 Kips)i W. Lf o PIMM KEW- Huaw Erewa*46 S, LORIDA POWER CORPORATION

-CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 z3UV REACTOR BUILDING PRESTLEMNG SYSTEM IN St 6th TENDON SURVEILLANCE DOC 0S-5-00823 PAGC I9 CALCMAT1ONS SUPPORTING SP-182' USW-O DATA FOR THE DOME0-TENDOI(S GROUP 0.7 Tend~on Uqdzna Strength P,6"Kp F lr D O M E R 3 .X L W _ _ _ T no__ _ _ _ _ _A:d ldid Ulft-Off S0 o% ee ro rlP-.U "Or' d $s dn Dw Vein*Tmdom I la dm (In.) uplem O j ?.n d w 1 EKI p) Raw a (Mips) Raw 3 (3L)m 2EE E M :' E v I a (A) " "" ____ (E) (n 1 I) (1)-Dill 3 $ 68130 _!110 7780 170 341 361 1372 1872 3 5 D112 4-14l 5 61800 684( 770 MO 790 -So- 359 1873 3867 4-3/4 s 0D133 718 4-34 6400) a84 717 7M9 363 359 1873 1867 4-7/5 4-3/4 0114 3-1.11 4-SAS "m0 6140 777 7790 363 359 187) 1867 $-lie +-3/8 b)1is 1 5 6w4 6800 779 7770 339 363 1867 1873 5 3 0136 4-3/4 S-3/8 6760 4100 77m 775 364 363 18l 138611 4.3/ 5-1/5 D3130 S 5 687 6830 7330 7710 358 361 IS63 1372 5 3 D131 4-112 4.7/1 6730 6740 7660 7700 366 365 1871 1171 43112 4.7/I 4-32 +1 4.7/8 67630 6800 7720 7750 354 362 3572 18611 4-il_ "is8 D211 ".64 S-1) "810 6870 "280 7110 361 351 1572 1863 3-1/4 5-1/l D21l 4-5/8 4.7/8 6m7 6770 7730 7720 363 363 167£ 159 4-3/0 4-7/S 1 2mu 43/V4 4,V/4 1 6M4 600 7"790 777 m" 362 1807 Is" 4-314 *3/4£3114 4-3/4 4-7134 6670 6740 7600 7680 369 36 38t" 15611 4-3M4 4-7/0213 4-34 31- ow0 4170 7800 7810 362 358 logo 1863 4112 5-1/4 0216 S 3 6100 WI10 777 7780 362 361 is?) 1372 S 3 W031 3-3/8 5-7/8 6530 6330 7430 7430 376 378 1870 £371 3-311 S-7/4 D3(73 4-1/4 S1134 6760 6770 77M 7730 364 363 187n 1879 4.114 S-3/4.MD304 43/8 4- 6840 68w3 779 777 359 362 1867 1873 4-11 4 03m 43/3 4-3/36 6700 64M 76L30 760 -367 363 1867 187 4-218 4.3116 0300 4-3/4 4-3/4 6110 8130 7730 778 361 Sol 1872 137 43/4 4.314 0310 3 4-1/2 6770 6770 772 730 363 363 1869 17 .1 0D313 4311116 4-5/8 6100 6840 7770- 7790 362 359 1873 1867 4-11116 4-518 0332 4-7/81 4-7/1 14 6840 7M9 777 339 362 r 3867 1873 4-7fi3 4.74-t 5636mmccih myld rs ula u i3m u puam faASpeu u mjiaA , .ip-, I ~113-3-28-Jan-9 3:64 PM U*1 k.JnFLORIDA POWER CORPORATION-CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 REACTOR BUILDING PRESTRSSIG SYSTEM)6t TENDON SURVEMLLANCE CALCULATIONS SUPPORTING SP.182 "ORIGINAL STRESSINO DATA* FOR THE 1lOOP TENDONS GRUMP 0.7 Tendon Ultiate Swmngd -0.S Tendon Ultimbte Stent -Fie: HOOPR3.XLW DOC I3:S-95-082 REVISION 3 PAGE 160 it,!0 Actal Pr.dced IUN-Off 8go U au tw Sfv-sIu 'orgm Struia Dowe-TendMI 1louad (wn) Prwmve 110 Pemn (Wsu) j Raw I (Kips) x" 2 oups) f Rw 3 (In: 42fll -r57 4-5/8 U870 6810 0718 1 017=73180 333 1 36 1163 187 "T 4-5/8 42HI38 S 5.3/8 68410 6799 7810 77M 359 3Q2 1873 1865 3 5.3/8 42H329 5.3-/2 5.1/8 6170 6310 7810 7780 358 363 1863 1872 5-1/2 5-148 42H430 4-7/8 ".34 6870 6790 7810 7750 358 362 1863 1371 4-718 5-3/4 421131 51/J4 4-7/8 6870 U820 7830 7780 M5 363 1863 1872 S-1/4 4.7/8 421132 3-1i4 5-1/8 68M 6790 7310 7750 358 362 3863 1871 5-1/4 5-1/8 422433 5-3/8 5-1/4 6870 "830 7810 7780 358 1 361 2363 1372 5-3M 5-1/4 4244 5.112 5-3/8 6750 6660 7680 7600 364 36 1865 387 3-1/2 5-3/8 42)135 5 5-1/4 6830 6770 7760 7720 360 363 11162 1869 5 5-1/4 421336 5.1/8 5-1/1 6170 6790 7810 7750) 358 362 1863 2373 5-1118 5-818 421137 3-3116 4-7/8 6670 6130 17310 7710 338 361 1843 3872 5 -5/26 4-718 421H43 3-142 3-1/8 6870 6810 7110 7710 358 361 1863 1873 "-32 5-1/8 421144 5.3/11 s 6790 6140 7750 7700 362 359 1871 1861 5-1/8 5 421145 3-7116 5 6870 6810 7810 7780 358 361 186 1372 5-7116 5 461320 53-/4 5-1/8 6640 6600 7700CD 7610 370 373 1901 1890 "14/ 5.1/8 461121 "is/ S-1/4 6720 6730 7700 7640 366 365 1878 1861 5-2/3 5.1/4 46242 "a5/ 5.114 672D 6730 7700 7640 366 363 1878 1363 5-M/ 3-1/4 5 1H25 5 5-3/8 -6770 6100 7720 7750 363 362 3869 1868 3 5-1/8 532H26 S-1/2 53-U4 6760 6760 7750 17700 364 364 31179 1861 5-112 543/4 533H27 5-3/2 4-7/8 6740 6670 7680 7600 365 369 3868 1861 "M3/ 4-7/8 5331221 -1/8 5 6760 6750 7750 7700 364 364 1879 1870 -3/I1 5 512H29 5.1/2 4-3/4 68310 6750 7710 7700 361 364 1872 1870 5-1/2 4-314 5331 5-3/4 1 -/ 6700 16760 7650 7720 367 1 364 2873 1872 3-3/4 5.1/8 53112 5-3J4 4-M1 6800 777 7760 7720 362 316 13870 1628 5.3/4 4-4/4 33H43 53138 4-1/8 6670 6710 7600 7660 369 366 3861 1873 5.3/8 4.1/8 533H45 3.1/4 5.3/4 644) 6800 77M 777 3550 362 1867 1873 3-1/4 5-1/4 S3311AA 4-718 5-3/8 6160 6130 7M3 16CA 344 365 33M 1365 4-7/8 5-311 531,147 4-3/4 3-M/2 6840 6800 779 7770 339 362 1867 1873 4-3/4 5.2/2 621223 3-13/ 4-314 6760 6700 7720 7650 364 367 1872 3871 5-1/8 4-11M 621M2 5-5/16 s 6800 6750 7770 7700 362 364 1873 1870 "11/6 5 62)42 3.1/8 F -114 680 6750 7770 1770M 362 364 1873 1370 1 5.2/8 5-1/4 623139 3-7/16 5-1/4 610D) 6750 7770 17700 362 36 18173 1870 1 37/16 5-1/4 62H440 5-3/8 4.718 68w0 6750 777D I 7700 362 364 1873 1870 1 5-3/5 4-7/8 621141 5-1/4 5 68310I 6750 7770 770 362 364 1873 1870 5.2/4 5 623142 5-3/8 5.3/16 6800 6750 7773 7700 362 364 13173 1870 J-3/11 5-2161;62H443 5-3/8 4-7/8 6710 6670 7660 7600 3"6 369 3871 3863 5-3/8 4-718 621144 5-1/2 4-7/8 6100 6750 77"0 7700 362 364 1873 1870 S-I/l 6-715 621145 5-3/16 5-1/8 6760 6700 7770 7700 364 367 1884 1884 5.3/16 S-1/9 62H446 5-1/9 5-318 6100 6750 770 7700 362 364 1573 187 5-13/ 3-3Y8 ,621147 5410/ 1 4.3/2 6680 16640 17620 17M5 368 370 1870 1 1864 1 5.5/ 4-1/2 pi~IR IR.ba Ia m ul.,- imI Ia b wiled 1mw b ml -.d u .ymaimum1J Im ebmuu A b 4 3:24 PM)

• y 2 FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION

-CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 REACTOR BUILDING PRESTRESSING SYSTEM-6th TENDON SURVEILLANCE Dtot3 M95=a2 REAS01 2 PAGE 161 CALCULATIONS SUPPORTING SP-182 *ORIGINAL STRESSING DATA" FORTHE VERTICALTENDONS GROUP 1#1 0.7 Tendon Ultimate Strength r- K39I3ps 0.8 Tendon Ultimate Strength E 73Kips File: VERTR2.XLW Actual Predicted Lift-Of 80% Ultimate For SP-182 "Original Stressing Vata'Tendon ElngIaton (In.) Pressure (psi) Pressure(p) Row 1 (Kips Row 2 (KIps) Row 3 (In.)ID~ =w Vid Shp Fl--YP -o Shop Fil o il lo ield 23V24 17/8 NIA 6170 N/A 358 N/A 1863 N/A 12-7/8 N/A 12VI 12-1/2 N/A 680 N/A 7M7 NIA 362 N/A 1873 N/A 112-1n tI/A 12V2 12-112 N/A 6800 N/A 7770 N/A 362 N/A 1173 N/A 12-1/2 N/A 23VI 12-1/4 A 600 N/A 7770 WA 362 N/A 1873 NIA 12-1/4 NIA 23V2 13-1/3 NIA 6870 N/A '1810 N/A 338 N/A 1863 N/A 13-1/a M/A 23V3 13 N/A 6760 N/A 7750 NIA 364 N/A 1879 N/A 13 NA 34V5 32-5/8 NIA 6800 N/A 7770 N/A 362 NIA 1873 N/A 12-5/3 N/A 34V6 13 N/A 6810 WA 7780 N/A 361 M/A 1872 N/A 13 NIA 34V7 12-3/4 N/A 6870 N/A 7810 N/A 358 N/A 1863 N/A 12-3/4 N/A 61V9 12-5116 14/A 6860 N/A 7840 N/A 358 N/A 1873 N/A 12-5/16 N/A 61VD10 12-3/4 N/A 6870 N/A 78110 N/A 358 N/A 1863 N/A 12-3/4 N/A 61 VII 12-549 N/A 6710 N/A 7600 N/A 366 MIA 1873 N/A 12-5/8 N/A 61 V2 12-3I2 N/A 6870 N/A 71110 N/A 358 N/A 1863 N/A 112-1In N/A OIV21 12-1/ NA 6870 N/A 7810 N/A 358 ;NJA 8863 N/ZA 12-1/8 N/A 6V2 12-7/9 M/A 6870 N/A 7810 1N/A 358 N/A 1863 N/A 12-7/8 N/A 197L U_Columns A through G are data Input extracted from the tendon history books (applicable sheets contained In Attachment B).Columns H through M are calculated using the expressions noted below.Column Tendon within the scope of ths surveilbnce. Col.D&C Actual elongation daga taken from wtndon hisory shdets for shop and field ends respectively. For the verical tendons, only the shop end applies.CoI.D&E Predicted Liftoff Pressures taken from tendon history sheets for shop and field cnds respecdvely. CoI.F&O 809 Ultimate pressures takenf hom tendon Idsuory sheets for shop and feld ends respectively. Col H&I Columns H & I -Calculated force values In Kips for Orginal Stressing Data Row I which rqepre ram pressur @ 1500 psi.These forces represent a zero slack ataning point for both shop and field ends of each tendon and provide a basis for retensmklng efforts.The following expression Is used on calculate the values for Row I data: 0.7 " Tendon Ultimate Strength" 1500 1 Predicted Lift off Pressure at 0.7 tendon Ultimate Surngth.le. for,23V24: 1639 1500 16870 -35t ColJ&K CalculaWed force values In Kips for Orilinsl Suess Dat Row 2 data which reiwsent forces at 80% Utimate based on the following expression: I Actual pressure 0 80% Ultimate Strength (Cols. F or G)

• 0.7 Ultimate Strength I Predicted pressure @ 70% UIL from Cols. D or E.e. for 23V24: 7810 1639 1670 -1863 CoI.L& Actual elongation values repeated from Columns B & C for Row 3 of 'Oriinal Stressing Data".i -.12-Sep-97 9:49 AM 11%1-'I Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 AC 6Page 162 Calculation S-95-0082I r2v'

7.0 CONCLUSION

S Tendon Force/Time Curves have been generated from the results of this calculation. Final force curves arc presented and attached in Section 6.0 of this calculation. Force curves for the three control tendons were also gencrated by this calculation and were used for comparison and verification of data and spread shees with the same curves generated previously for the same tendons. The comparison was completed and the data sheets and force curve we found to be the same as that previously gcucratcd. Other calculations supporting the "Original Stressing Datae and "Data Sheets" in SP-! 82 were completed I and are presented in Section 6.6 of this calculation.

8.0 REFERENCES

The following refcrences are uscd in the preparation of this calculation:

1. G/C Lettcr to FPC, FCS-14594, Scope Document, Novcznber 24, 1995, for Preparation of Tendon Force Curves for the 6th Surveillance and site trip to CR3.2. G/C Letter to FPC, FCS-12439, August 13, 199 1, Tendon Selection and Recommendations for the Fifth Surveillance.

3. Reg. Guide 1.35,Revision3

4. Reg. Guide 1.35.1, Revision 0 5. CR3 FSAR, Section 5.2 6. Technical Specification, Section 3.6.1.6 & Section 4.6.1.6.7. Dcsisn Input for the 5th Surveillance, DI-55220-152.0 SE, Revision 2.8. G/C Calculation of Force curves for the 5th Surveillance for SP-1 82, Revision 11.9. Design Input 5500-528-1, Revision to SP-182 Procedure for Tendons and Calculations for Force-Time Curves for Surveillance 4, Revisions 0 and I, Jan.87 and Sept.87.10. G/C Calculation 5500-528-1, Tendon Loss Calculations for Surveillance 4, Revisions 0 and 1, Jan.87 and Sept.87.1i. GIC Calculation 04-4762-099, Tendon Loss Calculations and Appendices for CR3 Tendons, I.Fulton and G.T.DeMoss, 3/6/87 and 1980 calculations.

12. Dome Tendon History Sheets updated to the 5th surveillance.

13. Hoop Tendon History Sheets updated to the 5th surveillance.

emtc*P w Pim1g n "uE d "w&swIW ~Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 9163 Calculation S-05-0082 14. Vertical Tendon History Sheets updated to the 5th surveillance. I 5. Effective Wirt Summany information, letter to FPC 16. Prescon Vendor Dmawn 17. SP-182, cv 11.I S. Surveillance Report for the Fifth Inspection Period, VSL.19. Engineering Report for the Fifth Tendon Surveillance, G/C Letter to FPC, FCS 14401, 6120/94.)mor Lee d Pm owsp. WVffW exomwft I Florida Power co"~Oul DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Crystal River Unit 3 Page Al KEWN Calculation 3-95-00821 ATTACHMENT A DESIGN INPUT DATA FOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE K...i U.)m: U.t 6 P"ai REVP. Nugmw nf Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 cox. ,, _-_ _ -__Page A42 Calculation Design Input Information for the 6th Surveillance The Gilbcrt/Commonwealth Design Input document prepared for the 5th surveillaUce is stil applicable Since it was prepared at the time FPC 0d4ressed new licensing and Tech Spec revisions conceing the CP,3 Tendon Surefllance Progmm. TM document and some of it's anachments are attacbed beriw. Also. correspondence from the NRC esudting from It's review of CR3 tendon program issues is attached for reference. The following Tech Spec sections were reviewed and are applicable to the tendon surveillance program.Section 3.6.1.2. Amenadment 149 Section 5.6.2.7. Amendment 149 FSR Sections applicable include: Sections 5.2 & 14.2.2 Fiue 5-24 and 5-25 K-I Ow ',.'l: 9 olt ý IKZSP"; k'4~ ELqwew hpa A3 rs 09 03:6M .B.lDG'* NUCLEAR REG%ll4r,11.% .UK IMr. )erc~y N. Beard, Jr.Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations (HAZl)Florida Power Corporation ATTNo Managir, Ituclear Licensing 15760 V Power Line Street Crystal Rtivert Florida 344Z8.-708 117ED STAT28 ULATORY COMMISSION WrON. D.C. "u"&a" July 28. 199S".2 PA% 8ý"aFPO%.WA4-"-q0WA"So ldft Mm SUBJ EDT ,,, ire sdLh~t FILE NO.: W .LLLU.SUDJECT: REVIEV OF THE FIFTH 7TINOO SURVEILLUNCE REPORT -CRYSTAL RIVER IUCLEAR GENERATIN9 PLAJNT UIT 3 (TAC NO. 14O91S)

Dear Mr. Beard:

By letter dated August 12, 1293, as supplemented 0ecember 16, 1994 and ay i5, 1!0995 you submitted for Staff review .& report on the "esults for the Mfth seventeenth year after structUral integrity test (SIT)) thysical surveil lance of the Crystal River 3 (CR) Plant contalinmet LI dlg post-tensioning system. Tou performed the surveillance In accordance with the requirements of the original plant technical specifications (TS) for tendon surveillance and etgulatory IWld (119) 1.35 Revision 3. On the basis of your surtiSllance and Inspection of the various elemnts of the post-tensioning sstem, you concluded that the surveillance results demonstrate the intetrity Ofthe containment tendon system.We have copleted our review of your submittal and we concur with your conclusion vith certain exceptim0s. Your surveillance revealed grease leakage, corrosion of exchor5eads and bearing plates and spslli and circking of concrete, all of which could be detrimental to the contaiment tendon system. Please submit an action plan to rectify the undesirable conditions as Identified and to implement apprpriate actions to rectify them before the next. scheduled inspection. Our evaluation Is- enclosed.This completes our review undar the TAC No. 1010195 and, therefore, the TAC Is This requirement effects nine or fewer respondents, and therefore, t Is not subject to Office of Manloement and Budget review under PL. "-5 L. M sghbv as Project Nilanager " Project Directorate 11-1 Division of Reactor Projects _/1l1 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Yr Docket No. 50-302

Enclosure:

As shtatd cc w/enclosume: See next page n% AW 29 so 03Q7?Pf ttic AM*IN BLDG K->.or, dera N. leaN FloridaPower CorporationRr. .rald A. Williams Corporate Counsel Florida Power Corporation MAC-Am P.O. tax 1444t St. Petersburg, Tiorida 3373?Nr. truce 4. Hickle Girector lutimler lant operations (Oltk)Florida Pomer Catpoialon Cr1stal liver Energ Ctoplex 1760 V. Power Line Street Crystal River, Florida 34418-5708 Nr. Robert 5. lorsum DM Nuclear Technologies 1700 Rockville Pikes Suite 525 Rockville, Maryland 20852 IsP A4 crystal ,lver Unit No. 3 senerating Plant Kr. 4 ers, Director Division tf Emergoecy Proparedness flhepartsnt of Coinrty Affatir 3740 Contervtew Drive Tallhassee, Florida 2S24-t100 Modr of County Comissioysers, Citrus County 110 Not M Apopka Avenue Inverness, Florida 32550 Hr. Larry C. Kelley, Director Nuclear Operations Site Support Florfde Power Corporation Crystal Ittver Energy C&Vlex 16760 V wowr Line Street Crystal liver, Florida 34411-706.Sgitonal Maiistrator, "egion it Senior bsident ltssctor U.So Ncler _Regulatory tomission VWMI 101 Street N.V., Suite 1900 U.S. Nuclear Reg1latoy Commission Atluta, U ioyta 30323 741i N. 1111ahassee Road Crystal lver, IFltorid 34415 Mr. s1i1 Passtti office of ladiation Control POop~ % of Health And 1ihab1iitative Services 1)17 VIneVood Blvd*,.lallaabuse., Florida 33399-070A Attorney Seneral Depart t of Legal Affairs T1e Capital Tallahassee, Florida 32304 Wr .- U7v 3o4ts, vice Prusident -Nutiaces Pr~noduti Stun)florida Pomp Crpdorat R 14 iver Enrg coWieX IN P over Lime Street, crystal liver, florida 344256708 (.. 09 'lei Wssiti tc ruqrt 9LDG PW AS lhe Crystal River 3 (CR3) plant technical speclfications (IS) require perfoming periodit tendon surveillance Consisting of sheathing filler material Inspection, tendon lift-off force meAsurment. achora e caopoent inspections t U00% Wire InsPection and tensile testing$ grease leage checK, and tendon Metensloning and rettnsioning and reselling for & number of selected Undons. For the fifth survaillance, In addition to the three contro1 tendons (on* for each group), you randomly solecte two dome,, two vertical and four hooptendons ad subjected them to liftoffil, with one tendon In each group beig detensioned end reteansiloned. You perfaerd the surveillance in accordance with the requirements of the original plant IS for tendon surveillance and Regulstory guide (R) 1.3S Revision %. On the basis of your surveillance and tnspection of the various ema"nts of the post-tensioniug systes, you cofcluded that the surveillance results deaonstrats the Integrity 0f the contailmt tendon system.On the basis of our review of your submittal, we concur with your conclusion with certain exeoptions. Your surveillance revealed grease leakage, corrosion of anehorbeads and bearing plates and spaling and cracking of concrete, all of WhiCh could be detrimental to the contalnmeat tendon system. These tonditions are evaluated below.1. Gresse Voids From the data on grease removed from and grease replaced into the tendon sheathings there appeared tU be an unusually high amount of frease voids or lea19ge1. the amount Of grease added ranged from 93.% to as high as 30S1. In a letter dated September Uts 19941, we inddicatid that the loss of grease appears to be unsually high in comparison to other plants with similar"istresseed oncrete Containment$s ad st-tensioning systas. Your response indicated that the losses closely matchthose of previous survoillances &W a t thoreugh investigation hid viot diteritned a root cause for the WoweVer, Frho the sYeical test st Individual tendon wires, te chemical of the rouase Itself" and the lift-off tests, the tendon syste is msetaining Its integrity. furtievmors, there his beer no grase leakap observed on the outside surface of the contairument. On the basis of these observations. you reiterated that, in spite of the abnormally high amount of grease voids, the structural Integrity of the tendons has not bean affected.We find, your response to be reasonable. hMwevr, in view of the detrimental effects of potential grease leakage, you should monitor more closely the grease Wnjection procedure in future surveillances and perform a thorough root cause investigation for grease loss.2. Anchorage Assembly and lendon Vire Your surveillance revealed high levels of corrosion on the anchor heads on five of the tendons (three an the field and and two on both ends) under surveillance. A Pitting condition existed on localiWed areas of these anchor)heads, with no sigos of active oxidaticm cr bildp of crust or rust. No free ( moisture wais within the cP3 ;f airy te.rIu. The bulk filler grease covered all tendon stressing anchor heads except for the top end of one CAk40g.. S.qs4ms Z"), *95 SZ15zM NX Ptc r'&; %Aý Afwhw~., A lap A4 vertical tendon. Vou believe that this condition has existed since original installttion. You concluded that the observed conditions do not Indicate abnormal degridation Cd will not affect the function of the anchor heads.Your surveillance also discovered high levels of corrosion on bearing plates outside the seoled area of the tendon end caps of six tendons (on one and of three tendonsm id on both ieds of another three). The corrosion occurred extortor to the O-riag seal and has not progressed to the point of breaching the Integrity of Uth O-rij and affectiOU the tendon anchorage cWmonents. Repairs were me to the bearing platse to stop further degradation. The protection of the antchorage coopontnts Is assured W the function and sntagrity of the bearing plates Is 10aintained. However, based on our review of tendon surveillance reports of a number of plants' we find that the types of corrosion of anchorage components have not ton observed 14 other facilities and are uniqua to Tehrtforej we believe that it is necessiry for you to expand the inspection to anchorage assemblies, especially the bearing plites, of other tendons not under survoillance to insure timely repair of any adverse conditions. You Indicated that the cracking and spilling of concrete are Insnt ificant.i fHowever. this requires n#air before causing a further deterioratiso of concrete, and realforcemnt. It should also be also noted that yo report provided call general regarding moisture content and the detrimental chemical contents and does not give details of water content for each of the grease suples taken from the specific tendons and free water discovered anW uchorages and grease care. RG 1.35 requires such detailed Information and should be provided In future surveillance reports.One wire from each of the detonsioned dome, hoop and vertical tndons was tested. li addition, Ineffective wires and broken wires were remove for saPle selection and tettil. All of the tete satples exceeded the required minima values for _teld strength and elongation. All but one exceeded the required miniun ultimate strength. The cause for the broken wires was determined to be of a mechanical nature 6ot due to stress corrosion. The buttonhoads wire Inspected for their physical condition ad found to be effective and acceptable.

3. london Lift-off forces VOe have roviewed the lift-off forces of three dome, three vertical nad five hoop tendons and also the Information on the correlation of force and elongation of the three detensioned and retensioned tendons. Uith the exception of one hoop tendon (46M29) which had only s8.1% of the base valum (less thin the 90% of the base value as required), the lift-off forces of ether tendons wter above the lower bound values established for these tendons.Additional hoop tendons were lifted off to meet the requirements In MtU 1.35 under such a situation.

The forces tno the corresponding elongations for the) ~~three detensiopid Wr~ ratosisoned tnnd~us wars roviewad, and for each tandon-W& 1: Ir.o 1ia ,altA.-n bbq.ween the I-. It spp~irs to us thtat more cr 9ose-1!P J DMBD C~vem xs~4mW K,.). ?aww A?-3-careful elongation measurements could have provided the required correct Information and assurance of the quality of the overall tendon s'rvitlllaCe performed. The purpose of tandon surveillance Is to determine If the ties dependent prestress losses such as creep and shrinkage of concrete aW relUation of tendon wires are within the predicted range. The trend of such losses can be obtained by performing a reression analysis of the tendon lift-off fOrtes for the tendons 10 A grouP froe all the surveillances conducted to date after the SIT. before performng the analysis it is .ness ar, to correct the tAN seating force. This Is because during tendon installation and toaiotnir it is not possible to anchor all the tendons il a MOp at the sun force level and at the same tim. The tendons are insta1lh sequentially. VeM the containment Is subjected to the tendon force there will be elastic deformation. The tendon tensioned first will have lover force at completion of tensioning for the group thin those tnsioned list. Therefore, the Seating forct oust be corrected to reflect the tendon anchor force for the elastic shortening taking into consideration the tendon tensioning sequence. On the theory that the contetanmnt design Is based on the average tendon force of the group, an average of the corrected tendon anchor -forces Is determined. ly.iuoding this avors,: frce b each Individual corrected tendon force, a so-called nomIllt factor lffit obtaiMd. This NF is used to modify tM lift-off force of the tendoat obltain the average force whitch should be cop ared with the required tendon force. The NF for each tendon Is a coi'stant and will be used throughout all the surveillances. This appears to be t0 procedure used by a isaber of stilitits. Theoreticaly, anfter rnoliziatoii, all tendons In a group should have the same average value. Due to the method used In establishiig tUe lF and In obtaining the lift-off forces the tormalized tendon force Is at best approximate; but It should not vary.appreciably from the average value for the grovp.In contrast to the KF aproatch, the PS 1.31 asproach-to consider the prestress losses Is through the use of upper bound and lower bound of tendon fors as discussed is RB 1.35.1 and show In iF1. therein. The tverage of the tendon anchor forces tich are the tendon seating forces torretted far lStic l085sess can be used as the initial prestressing force. A grtah similar to tbat shown in Figt of PA 1.31.1 should be first tonstructed. TIe lift-off force obtitined for the of tendons vepresented by the graph should be plotted on the graph without any correction, Bly plotting the lift-off forces from consecutive tendon surveillance of the group of tendons, It becomes possible to perform a trending analysis of the tendon forces.In response our request for additional Information on normalization. youa formula for the NF, thich Is actually a tendon force correction and ncludee not only prestress loss due to elastic deformation but also the relaxation of the tendon wire. In view of this, the NF eii be different for each surveillance since It Involves the time factor. This only coaplicates the normalization procedure and does not improve the accuracy. If Ithe HNF invol.ve' relaxation of tendon wire, it appears the other tims.depondent W.strsr "*;cs 4dvi to crete AM Should O.o be Included. It is to Cakddlse S4.C 09 ~S C~W1 N. P~It4 ~ALMA. A-4.be Woted correction is made to the statin force only for the elastic loss which Is not tim dependent and the normalization factor which is based on the corrected tendon anchor forces Is used to todify the lift-off force to the average tendon force of the group. The HF procedure is based on the fact that after correction for elastic shorteaing loss each of the tendon forces and the average of these tendon forces for the group of tendons inr large toeared to the time-dependent prestress losses. 7Tirefore, the ratio$ iLe.the KF, between each tendon force vAd the average tendon force for the group after correction for elastic shortening loss will not vary asgnificantl from that after correction for the tivie-dependsrht o..o.s. The HF procedure s based on this promise.In response to our concerns regarding your normalization procedure &M use of thu average of lift-off forces for the tran! analysiS, you performad analyses for each of the following cases for each group of tendons: IIUsing lift-off averages, nomalized Using all data points, normaliztd Using lift-off averages, unmclhcralized )4) using all data points, namormulized The information ftr filt cast Weeplotted on a Oraph the sun a that shw. In fig. I of 10 _.n3.1 and a _regrssion analysis was performd for oasci case in each group. From the results of thoese antlyses we observed Issionificnt differences between the normalited cases (t ;ah (2) or the unnormlized cases () .and (4), and appreciable differences betmeen the normalized Wd the unaorml lz cdesea. However, based on the trend of all groups of tDoonss, no group of tendons vould be expected to go below its minrAm r*equird during the.4-yair plant life.Is spite of the favorable outcome of the results as susuarized above, e believe that for future surveillances, the lift-off forces should be used for the trend analysls without averaging and noralization. Etch tendon lift-off force should be compared with the predetermintd values of base, hS bias, and 101 base as required by RO 1.3S.In cofclusion, we concur with your conclusion that the results of the surveillance demonstrated the Integrity of the containent tendon system.However, before the etxt surveillance you should resolve the probr* aof missing greaso and should under'Lke a program of inspection of the anchorage system which consists of the anchor heads and the bearing plates to assure that the pittiang of the anchor heads and the -corrosiot of the bearing plate$uncovered In the surveillance are not wtdespread and would not jeopardize the integrity of the tendon anchorage system. You should repair the cracking and spilling of concrete so that there will be no further deterioration of concrete or reinforcement. for future surveillances, the trend stud.yof the.tendoer forces should be based on the lift-off forces without averagin and norM11111zjr. In retcnsionir-tendons, the elA aq atiofnis respondirg1 o to e~ carrul ly-Meawre@ so t2 t-r-u'4 feMW t btWt ths; two i S preserved. "17Ms can serv "is aiNadditional checK-on the tcurt. ty of the performed. rFt 27 0% f9942PMi tic ADI"Dr1l ..v Afomew~... NqRC. aft 1o;d /jd~t"EJ Mr. Percy N. Beard, Jr.Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations (SA)Florida Power Corporation ATTN: Manager, Xuclear Licensing 15760 V Pwer Line Street Crystal River, Florida 34428-6708 SVi3ECT: CRYSTAL RIVER MIXLEA SMIUERAINC PLANT INIT 3 -POSTPORNIENT OF SURVEILLANCE OF E[WIT 7TElIMS EXDIPTEO FROM THE FIFTH TEIQON SURVEILLANCE (TAC NO. M940561

Dear Mr. Beard:

ly letter dated October 23, 119S, you requested staff approval for postponing surveillance of eight tendons which were exempted from the fifth tendon.surveillance performed in 1193 to the sixth tendon surveillance. You had e imitted to Include the eight tendons In your sixth tendon surveillance which was orlginally scheduled to be performed In 123. You now propose to perform-te sixth tendon surveillanhce Is 199S wtich Is less' this Syerfomti fifth tendon surveillance which was performed Ise wov er 1 .Accordingly, you are requestin staff approval to postpone the surveillance of the eight tendons to the 1?18 sixth tendon surveillance. letter dated May 15 1919, you submitted results of your fifth tendon surveillance to demonstrate Integrity Of the containment tendon systme.In a letter dated July 28, 1935, we forwarded our evaluation of the Fifth Tendon Surveillance Report, and coftcluded that the trend of all groups of tendons Is such that no group of tendons will go below Its minimn required lift-off forces before the 40-yetar plant life. Our July 28, 119s letter also Identified certain undesirable conditions such as grese leakage, anchoraes bearing plate corrosion, cracking and spalling of concrete. In response to these concerns, you cemuited to perform, during Refuel 10 (In 11%), a complete valkdown of 549 tendons comprising the containment system. you also committed to perform visual inspection to monitor external corrosion, grease leakage, and monitor for spelling of concrete and take appropriate corrective actions where warranted. On the basis of the fifth tendon surveillance results and your couitment to perform visual inspection during the Refuel 10, we find t acceptable to perform the surveillance of the eight tendons duri %lnoT sixin Wuuvir surveillance scheduled for Refuel 11 In 1398, which Is within the 3 year surveillance frequency. In this matter we also would like to draw your attention to the following. In November 1916, you performed the structural Integrity test (SIT) on the Crystal River 3 (CR3) prestressed concrete contaiment. Per Regulatory guide 1 i "M 27 '96 09:*42'I ttC n~rejl a= AdM ss e A FarpA10 Mr. Percy W. luerd, Jr. -.(RG) 1.35, the tendon surveillances are to be performed 1, 3, and S years after SIT mnd ever$ 5 years thereafter. You have tomitted to follow the ft 1.35 criteria. omver, a review of the history of your tendon surveillance indicates that your 3rd, 4th and st tendon surveillances have been performed on Sri approximately 6-yar Interval. 011ie plant technical specifications allow schedule flexibility (IaZSX inspection interval extaesion for conducting survelIncss), #sunh A schedule extension should not be continued on a loft-term basis. Also, the general Industry practice has been a plus or minus 6 montts sciedule variance.This completes our effort under TAD No. 194036 and the TAt Is closed. If you have any questions, pleast call me at (302) 415-147].Sincersly., L.. Raghavan, Project Manager Project Directorate 11.1 Division of Reactor Projects -1/11Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation @cc:t So. 5tDavit cc: Sue ~e t papa p cam s-nm4 Afteht" A, 10's A I!aghwwl~ng hIUbtaed"me .I KI)Y)Czsa he nt3-ý 5ý5 DI-652045 S2. SE (~)DESIGN INPUT RECORD SUBJECT Tendon. Sumv inace Prop=am prelmntion Of Mic Calc'4atims and Surveillance Phowduw SP-e92 Struczurl 2241 1 PAGE I REVISION 0 1 2 3 ITEM(S) REVISED ORIGINATOR ME DATE 0a Ots q A RAEMEW DATE o f3 auq / C APPROVAL (OCE)DATE ;V /. t MS,% y,_FUTUJRE CONFIRMATiON MEOWfED? N M~cROIMWEO / DATE INMh CQS: tU;E'W/0rnfrruasNOTMAppuC0Am Bt CIRCLE ORCLOUD IMOMT FYWAS1D INFOI: lON JTiCALuNE INF4GHT MAMI4 AND nEvI*N NUMB USEADOMnONAL SHUETS AS NECESSARY. I eg/jI,A,:, -Z 'kEP/$e2 fr4s /w~ no) Z'sym 1 4rnwei'~gwr z.COMMWS1ON RERO REV. 013cL'LUNEENRSm OTHERS w EOR .El'E--------------....M CIFMSR LA=CrOll Pm OCE DR016- OPAFT REVIEW 0 x I X 2 K x)7THIS fS A PERMAN~f.h EStGN R mECORD GAS.=2 2-92V Aftusu A EfngIn.e.ng InscUon No. I POPe All DESIGN INPUT RECORD tOCfnMER DJ-5520-12.0 SE P.MV. 2 ov6 DESIGN INPUT FOR: CR3 P 2 o 5TH TENDON SURVEILLANCE PERIOD REM%$ION. 2 CAM, 17NOV93))1. SCOPE OF THIS DIR; BASIC FUNCTIONS OF SYSTEM, STRUCTURE, OR COMPONENT: This DIR presents Design Input documentation related to the 5th Tendon Surveillance Program for Crystal River Unit 3. The scope of this DIR is for the preparation of Force(Time Curves for individual tendons, misc. calculations supporting surveillance activities, as well as for the revision of Surveillance Procedure, SP-182, for the performance of site inspection activities. Revision 1 of this DIR will address the change in inputs required as a result of the NRC not accepting the FPC proposed Tech Spec revision for the CR3 Tendon Surveillance Program to comply With the requirements of AME Section XI, Subsection IWL FPC's discussions with the NRC concluded that the FPC program requirements should be based on Reg Guide 135, Revision 3, issued July 1990.Revision 2 of this DIR will address the change In Inputs required as a result of several meetings at the CR3 site. FPCs discussions with the NRC concluded that the new EPC Tech Spec Program may not be implemented as soon as expected and that the current Tech Spec requirements are to be be addressed for this surveillance within the acceptance criteria of SP-182, Revision 11.2. CLASSIFICATION; DESIGN CODE(S) AND STANDARDS: Nuclear Safety Related Classification Existing Tech Spec 3.6.1.6 and 4.6.1.6, Amendment 29 & 31.FSAR 52 Reg Guide 135, Revision 3, July 1990.3. PERFORMANCE REOUIREMENTS AND SOURCE: The Tendon Surveillance Program is controlled by Tech Spec Sections 3.6.1.6 and 4.6.1.6.However, FPC is currently going through a Tech Spec Improvement Program and will possibly be implementing this Program In mid November in the nuddle of the surveillance. The new Tech Spec (See Attachment

1) will commit the Surveillance Program to Regulatory Guide 135, Revision 3 criteria.

FPC has discussed this with the NRC, and it was agreed that the new acceptance criteria Is acceptable for use for this entire surveillance period. Therefore, the Reg. Guide criteria will be the basis for a revision to the existing Revision 10 of Surveillance Procedure SP-182. P-e .G0 iveet[4,4he-fhequiee.ae~ofh-the-ciurrentexis T pee-wiR net.ben " ued-4nIherevfisio.o.SP-S24.geo-Atisehffiev*)- It was determined in mid November that the existing current Tech Spec requirements will have to be addressed in SP-182, Revision I I until the actual implementation of the new Tech Spec program takes place., T"his acceptance criteria is to be worked into SP-182 in addition to the Reg. Guide 135 acceptance criteria already built into the draft version.S -GCommonwaslh "--

ze'T -I -S -DESQGN R=R1O2 QQ UQZ 12ESTRO DESIGN INPUT RECORD DI-SS20-52..O SE , ~PAGE:~ 3.o46 ir4 I DESIGN INPUT FOR: CR3 STH TENDON SURVEILLANCE PERIOD AEVISION:

2 DATM 17NOV93 4. DESIGN MARGINS OR SAFETY FACTORS: Design margins and safety factors are as included in the above Codes and Standards.

5. DESIGN CONDITIONS AND SOURCE: There are no design activities.

6. OPERATING CONDITIONS AND SOURCE: WTiS surveillance will be performed during normal plant operation.

Tendons in the area between Buttresses I and 3, (00 to 1209) must be avoided due to the safety hazard of the main steam vents in that area. After numerous discussions with the site, it was determined that outside tendons with the following group/buttress numbers are to be considered inaccessible due to the steam venting problem: 13HXX, 42HXX, S1HXX, 53HXX, 62HXX. Inside tendons accessiblit~y must be individually confirmed through an FPC walkdown/concurrance. Radiological conditions, safety, and Interference with safety related systems and components may affect the selection of tendons inside the plant. Adequate consideration. must be given to the potential effects on safety related systems from any surveillance activity.FPC has been Informed by G/c that the tendon selection process can be sucessfully completed for this surveillance using the limitations on the tendon population as noted above, however, the next several surveillances caimg be performed during plant operation because of these effects on the random tendon selection process.In addition, the exempted tendons from the selection process of this surveillance must be reviewed and considered for inclusion in the next surveillance. The exact position for the resolution of many exempted tendons will depend on the final accepted position taken by the NRC on the proposed Tech Spec position taken by FPC. See the Attachment 3 letter, Attachment I. This position will not affect remaining work for this surveillance but will need to be considered In future work.7. AMBIENT CONDITIONS AND SOURCE: Ambient temperatures and pressures of the Reactor Building during normal operation of the plant are to be considered. Elevated temperature effects on the tendons may need to be considered. S. MATERIAL(S): Most tendon materials are replacement of original materials. A summary of tendon related materials can be found in FSAR Section 5,22.33 and In the CR3 Reactor Building Design Basis Document.GIlbC uCommonweMCI= THIS LS a ERMANENT QMN RECORD DO NOT DESTROY AUbdmk A&Vgln.e"ng InsucVon N4C 1 O. !Ai4 DESIGN INPUT RECORD IDENTIPER_ __,_ _ _ _ __r_...._DI-552CW 10 SEPACE. 4,1 6 D E S IG N IN P U T F O R : C R 3 ... ....STH TENDON SURVEILLANCE PERIOD REVISIOm: 2____oAM 17NOV93 9. OTHER REQUIREMENTS: The requirements of Reg Guide 1.35, Revision 3, are essentially the same as the requirements of ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL In many places, the ASME Code provides a greater level of detail than the requirements of the Reg Guide. The ASME Code document will be utilized as a reference In the interpretation of some Reg. Guide requirements and criteria.FPC administrative procedures noted In References 16, 17, and 18 are to be followed for the revision of SP-182.The normal 40 year plant life is to be considered. As yet, no consideration for plant life extension has been requested from FPC. Future retensioning or other tendons work may need to consider any FPC plant life extension plans or considerations.

10.

REFERENCES:

1. Design Input 5500-528-1, Revision to SP.182 Procedure for Tendons and Calculations for Force-Time Curves for Surveillance 4, Revisions 0 and 1, Jan. 87 and Sept. 87.2. Calculation 5500-528-1, Tendon Loss Calculations for Surveillance 4, Revisions 0 and I Jan. 87 and Sept. 87.3. J. Fulton and G. T. DeMoss Calculation 04-4762-099, Tendon Loss Calculations and Appendices for CR3 Tendons, 3/6/87 and 1980 calculations.

4. Vertical Tendon History Sheets 5. Hoop Tendon History Sheets 6. Dome Tendon History Sheets 7. SP.182, Revision 10.8. SP-182, Revision 7. (Last surveillance proven revision)9. ASME B & PV Code, Section XI, Subsection IWL 10. Regulatory Guide 135, Revision 3, Issued July 1990.11. Regulatory Guide 1.35.1, Revision 0, Issued July 1990.12. G/C Engineering Study on the CR3 Tendon Surveillance Program, FCS-13670, Marcd 5,1993.-" OGUw/Cowmonnwsallh OAJT523 2 4 1 1c TW I "EMANNT ESINBEORDDON IHQ!T.I.

'I I I Amedwmkm E.gln~wlg Instruavon NO. 1 P"*AJS DESIGN INPUT RECORD IotNHWIER DI-55S20-L.L. SE DESIGN INPUT FOR: CR3 5o6 5TH IEDON SURVEILLANCE PERIOD vim": 21-NOV93 13. 0/C Study of ASME Section X), Subsection IWL for the CR3 tendon Surveillance Program, FCS-13892, June 2, 1993.14. G/C Letter to FPC, FCS-12439, August 13, 1992, for Task I deliverables, Tendon Selection, General Report and recommendations for the 5th Surveillance.

15. Prescon Vendor Drawings-G/C Vendor Code 4680, Drawing Numbers 52-0026-OOI1A through 52-0026-0043P.

16. FPC Administrative Instructions, AI.402B, Procedure Writing (Except for EP/AP/VP), Revision 8, 10/25/91.17. FPC Administrative Instructions, AI-400-C, Permanent Procedures Revisions, Revision 10, 11/19/92.18. FPC Administrative Instructions, AI-701. Conduct of Inservice Inspection, Revision 9, 7/11/91.19. G/C Memo, 10/27/93, D.L. Keiser to M. Marcellus, Calculation references for minimum required prestress forces.20 Crystal River 3 Reactor Building Design Basis Document.21. G/C Engineering Report for the 3rd Surveillance, By T.H. Noble, May 19, 1982.22. G/C Engineering Report for the 4th Surveillance, By J. Herr, March 10,1988.23. G/C Scope Document Letter to FPC, FCS-13766, 4/2/93.ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposed and submitted FPC Tech Spec showing compliance to ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL, fax received from FPC on 9/24/93.2. 5/C Letter to FPC, 10/8/93. FCS-14114.

M. Marcellus to J. Mascoll/B.Crane/B. Gutherman, Summary of G/C Design Input positions.

3. FPC Letter to the NRC, October 25, 1993, Withdrawat of Tech Spec Change 197 with attached revised Tech Spec, Changing from ASME IWL compliance to Reg Guide 1.35, Rev 3 compliance.

Ob.bn/Co~mmnow.ui22 0A423 2.2'WINQT-ESThQY cd ha-9sma AwaawmsA rap A16 EMnownl"n If'SUtswuag no0.I KY)I DESIGN INPUT RECORD EWNW DI-S520-t5U. SE DESIGN INPUT FOR: CR3A"-STH TENDON SURVEILLANCE PERIOD R O 2 cATL. 17NOV93 0/C Letter to FPC, 10/12/93, FCS.14119, M. Marcellus to J. Mascoll/B.Crane/B. Outherman, Revised summary of G/C Design Input positions.

5. G/C Letter to FPC, 10/27/93, FCS-14158, M. Marcellus to J.'lascoll/B.Crane, with G/C comments on the proposed Tech Spec.K-,)I G~bwtjComnWmonw.

OAI523 22wo re, 53 PrAW-1; t; diOS.,5400-Mdmw" A"4p A17 GilberlWCmmanmeaith w,,&IWI 0COMM. Cutw. ft.0 NUbsM AL PgWq. PA W10 ROY W. ADLERSutv'c Mr. R. T. Bowles Nudesla Prject Management Engineer Florida Power Corporation P. 0. Box 14042/C2 St. Petaburg Florida 33733 82o .12.o SE 4 Pagle I October 12, 1993 FCS-14119 Work Order #D4520-152 2z.Contract NPMOOAD, WA 152&. ne , ,1 A77.,. J'IA X (Q~f APoIs&-Antentlo: J.0. MA=cB-. Cbm, B. (lutherman

• R P y:al RIver 3 Tendon Surveilance Program ReL VCS.14114 Dated October 7,1993 Action By: FPC- October 13. 1993 Review and Comments, Unless N/A

Dear Mr. Bowles:

ey issues and criteria for the tendon surveilance prog-am were reviewed with you im the above referenced lener. Since then. the direction for implementation of our work has diazied based upon the NRC rejection of the Tech Spec for the Tendon Suzvelluout Prolraf.Based on dimusions with Bruce Crane, we will now perform a&I related tendon swuveillance tasks based on the following:

1. Revision 11 of SP.182 will now be perfonned to comply with Reg. Guide -1.35 Reviion 3, not ASME Section XI. Subseeton IWL An ealer review of the Reg. GuideMv the CR3 popum condcluded there were no sipfleant Issues oc disadvantages to to Reg Guide. Revision 3. However. until our review and revision is coMPhte, GIC 13 ronimendmg that FPC consider that there are some exceptons likely to be taken ainsvt the fil conplianc to the Reg. Guide by FMC. O/C will notify FPC as ay aicant=qeton Is identified.

2. The documentation of the above position, acceptance Items and specific interpretations of the Reg. Guide acceptance criteria has not been decided at this time. It may be within CP-145. However, an Interim place is to kdude these positions within SP-182. 0/C will now include some of the general positions in the SP-1S2 document, but is uncertai whether all enlie ing positions and acceptance criteria cam be properly placed In SP-182.SP-182 has basicaly addressed site inspection activites in the past and has not addressed engineering/licensing Issues to any level of detail."Aift=: PFA IN mtI l.P.P 1V1SAU INOWN I.h WS'7

• Fv. 2375=.2al
• 2uR2 i 17M-~SmJIhII Ii. 1Oss~temum wt bin.S ZIO.0ahlgsgt~lP27 30
• tdig: it 21
• F; ISU1751-,1 AVIdW= A 064M-1 2.0 SE ATTACHMENT 4 popq"" OMNI*.lo-*A "ram to Aý M~A
• w MVMA,. I ba Page 2 3. It Is assumed that the Tech Spec Improvement Propgram wM be in place and accepted by he N14C by November 2nd. With the suweilanc rapidly approaching a Tech Spec revison pror to that date Is tbqractiL TeM accq m critermi fo the interim period up to November 22 was dscwussed.

' d on the established CI3 Tendon Survela=co Pop=m as defined by SP-182 and other documents. it is assumed that this entire tendon surdlance csn be performed apinst the new critera. Therefo, the saoeptance aitemia within SP.182 which Is related to the ctisting Tech Spec positions w0l be removed and replaced by the Reg. Guide 135, Revision 3 positions. This wl involve new enclosures and calculastto witlhn SP-182.Note that the above direction siplicandy changes m positions noted in the reference letter.However. Items 4,5, 6 and7 of that letter are unchanged for O/C to Implement the required cope of work.vic concurrece with the iabve positions by October 13 Is required for OjC to complet ow tWks in support of the surveMan. Any revision to the above wil Impact out completion of SP.182.Additional rework, endosures and verification resultn fr this dnge In criteria, as disussed abafe has impacted the schedul. Assuming no further change in basic aieria. Revision 11 will be electroniclly transmitted to FPC on October 26 for review sad comments. In additIon, a copy of the document wi be Federal Ppressed aSt the same time.Should there be questions or d,,cussion on any of the above items, please feel free to cotaul us at your convedente. Very trul ymurs W(. $1.9k4 .... -M .Marcellus.9 StrsucmiulTask Enginee ILW.AdAW Pro4ee Manager IL T. Mascoe IL Outheman.L Crane FPC Rfcords Management (CL Onl)P. W. AdM (2)C. N. Rentschler D. D. Krause.I I Florida Power AUAIOm DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Crystal River Unit 3 Page BI Calculation S-95-0082 ATTACHMENT B TENDON HISTORY SHEETS FOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE I.)!o arrTW* ~40 ft"P 0000 "."m m;Gw ..ee~Odg_ , .u-~s~aasz Florida CRYSTAL RIVER U1lT NO. 3 rp P2 Power REACTOR BUILDINZC PRE,:rESSNC SYSTE TENDON( 'ISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUBER --2/a CUT LENGTH / -.SHOP ID: PC 1 l CR j FIELD WASHER PC )Q _. CR _L4 1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I /0/VO DATE -,,/i/',; _2. Date tendon received on-site P3X9 I ~ R Number 0-7-3. Date Installed in conduit S-/-74 installation NcCF'Wires removed 0 Wires teplaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded L ./-'74 ButtonheadLng NCR's " Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineff ective wires 0 5. Date stressed 2/- 1-7*J 'Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing NCR's .......SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL L)Elongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred./Act. -e4 _IqK _1 _L__ _ _ cj?-/Lift-Off Pressure -Ptedicted/Actual W,00 i&Sl cWiOM VhIA Shim Thickness/80% Ultimate Pressure 7 J127 211Q 7ff /Unseated/Broken tires -- An Total effective wires after stressing JJ 2 , 6. Date Bulk-filled 75- 7 " .1ulk-Filling NCR' a Time since Installation Inlet Pressure ,T,. : O.. utlet Temp.Date end caps refilled; Shop __ "___ .Field-_-7. Data compiled by ~2 *A ~Or~ganization_______________ Date 8. Additional Coments: 11

Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UIN1T NO.. 3 Fr1 Power REACrog BUDI G PRE

MRESSIC SYSTEH K-' * *? oe ,. TENDON itISTORY TENDON4 IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 2)1/ CUT LEHMn 94 SHOP WASHER ID: PC 11 1 I CR JFIELD WASUER ID: PC -15Q I CR 1 I 2-.-5._1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I /0/, 90 'DAZE Y../_/__Z 2. Date tendon received on-site ' 3 ..jg-- 7// RH1R Number_____________

3. Date Installed in conduit , -741 Installation NCR's ____Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buctonheaded

& -_-7M/ ButtonheadIng NCR's _Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 54 Date stressed In-aL .- 4 , Stressing NCR's 11 17 bate restressed Restressing CR _NCR'SHOP END FIELD END T'oAL Ilongutlon. (1500 psi to BOX ult.;)-Prcd./Act. I_--J1_14'_____ Lif t-Off Pressure. -Predicted/Actual ..AbXJ1NIA Shim Mhckness/802 Ultimate Pressure -7 it L777 p R "I _V I NIA Unseated/Broken Wires b Total effective wires after stressing Ha ?6. Date Bulk-filled ...._,_.__ ___ Bulk-Filling NCR's ____ ... ...Time since Inst;2lation M" Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps refIlled: Shop ,_Field __ -- __... ....7. Data compiled by O Organization Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _B. Additional Comments: _ cakvh w 4.u Florida CRYSTAL RIVER turqT NO. 3 14 Power REACTOR BUILDING PiLt"TRESSING SYSTEM) ** C,* O*b.DA9.*- TENDON HISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER CUT LENcTH SHOP WASiHER ID: PC_ Ci_ FIELD WASHER ID: PC_ ___ CR .....1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I DATE 2. Date tendon received on-site _4R Number 3. Date Installed In cooduit Installation NCR's Wires removed. Wires replaced Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded. ButtonheadnLg HCRO__Bad vires Accept. Reheada ., Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed .__ _ Stressing NCR's Date restressed _ __ _ Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL V./'% Elongation (1500 psa to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. L..LIft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual LN........... K/A Shim Thickness/80 Ultimate Pressure L .* _ _H/A Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective wires after stressing 6. Date Bulk-filled --__ __Bulk-Filling I$CW e .Time since installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop ..... ... Yield 7. Data compiled by .1? a 19._ _ OrganIzation Date __________________

8. Additional Comments:

APw ,e ,d^/" F -IS n n _- i_ 4

• --.,Floida CRYSTAL RIVER ur NO. 3-Por lw r REACOR BUILDIN:C PPRS! PE.SSUNG SYSU s5~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Tm fi°". ts'loRyr END04, I DENT_______101;________D___4_

CUT LEN4GTH I/'/- Zr~HOP ID: PCLRF______ _H 11) -. PC 1,2A CR 4706* CAI/Q& vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I _____,._DATE _,____. __.D Date tendon r.ceived on-sit- a /A -74 S Number 3. Date Installed in conduit _7_... ____ Installation NCR's ....Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective vires 40 i. Date buttonheaded 1,0-I-74 ButtonheadLng NC4R's _ , _.__ _.Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 i. Date stressed str//. .7-7 Stessing 11CR's /17,'./72 Date restressed /R?-//. 74 'estressIns UCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL'ongation (1500. psi. to 60% ult.)-Pred./Act. IIAf ~IA 9"&'~' ..L..iftOfPressure -PridictedlActual 6 ~" , ?90n/A Shia ThicknessO80 Ultimate Pressure .1 Z770 , 6 ,/A Unseated/Broken Wires , _ ,_Total effective after stressing L/62 6. Date Bulk-filled .3--,5.- 9' sulk-Filling NcR'__Time gince Installation fi7/Xzd Inlet Pressure -..,4i. Outlet Temp. II Date end caps refilled: Shop /I-24.7& Field Y/I/2,0 -7 7. Data compiled by___ /_ _ _ _ Organization __ _ __._ .8. Additional Colents: A tt ______________________dj__,;_ S "S I =l I rl :m-04M&Florida$) Power cakmal5."4g AFtarmlu 56 A194I636 CRYSTAL RIVER U1117 N0. 3 ItEACTOR BUILDINGC VL:TRESSIN4 SYSTEHl STORY p I SHOP WASHER IDN PC_ _ CR FIELD WASHER ID: PC CR.L. CATIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I DATE 2, Date tendon received cn-site RHR Humber 3. Date installed In conduit Installation NCR's Wires removed _ Wires replaced _ Total Ineffective wires 4, Date buttonheaded Buttonheading CRICs Bad vires ___Accept. Reheads _ Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END Elongation (1500 psi to 80Z ult.)-Pred./Act. .-Lift-O[f Pressure -Predicted/Actual / ,, -Shim Thickness/80 Ultimate Pressure I Unseated/broken Wires Total effective wires after stressing 6. Date Bulk-filled ___Bulk-Fillitn NCRe's Time since installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop ......_Field 7. Data compiled byS-1 Orgailzatlon _TOTAL/I/A N/A.. ....... ... J I Date 8. Additional Comments: ".AO / .A" -, i /, -lA IP~ -I fs' l _ L / -' (-_ / -/. .) Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UrT NO. 3 Par-.,7., Power REA(TOR BUILDING sINCSYS TEM TENDION hISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION ,NUMBER L 1 CUT LENGTH /-le? 7 SHOP WASHER ID: PC_-_---- CR -', FIELD WASHER ID: PC M2 CR 1. CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I ________,. DATE ______ _2. Date tendon received on-site -R Number .37 .gg 3. Date Installed In conduit i-o2-1V Ins'tallation NCR's Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective vires 0 A. Date buttonheaded 9*_.30-__ Buttonheading NCR'_Bad vires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed / -/ Stressing NCR's .....Date restressed Restressing NCR.'s SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL I.ongatfon (1500 pat to 80 ult.)-Pred./Act. ..55 L 5 5Z J 0 Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual IN"/00v!stm" N/A Shim Thicknes/80Z Oltimate Pressure Ir- N/A Unseated/Broken Wires (.). Total effective vires after stressing _*" 6. Date Bulk-filled -Bulk-filling NCR's Time since installation &Inlet ressure Q _ Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop _. _,_Field _7. Data compiled by ? Organization_ Date 3/3o/7 7 8. Additional Comments: Florida CRYSTAL RIVER 1,,11T NO. 3 rage.-s Power REACTOR BUILDUIC PRLTRESSlIV SYSTE '* 006 o.,- TENDON IIISTORY TENDON4 IDENTIFICATION4 t4UHflR CUOT LENGCTH _______SHOP WASHER ID: PC_ CR _ _ FIELD WASHER ID: PC_... CR. .1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I DATE ____::_2. Date tendon received on-site Wi__, _ NR Number 3. Date Installed In conduit .Installation NCR**_,_Wires removed , Wives replaced Total Ineffective Wires 4. Date buttonheaded Buttonheading NCR's Bad wires ... .Accept. Rlheads ..... Total Ineffective vires 5. Date stressed Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restresslng NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL K-' Elongation (1500 psi to 807 ult.)-?red./Act. J .'! .Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted-/Actual .., ..,..I.....A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure N L/A Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective vires after stressing .6. Date Bulk-filled ,__ lk-Fillrng NCR's Time since Installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop___ _ Field 7. Data compiled by ..2 ~Organization_____________ Date Addiiona e.8a Additional Comments: Al.oe*. ,-. ..29.4 d &AA ý V 7hf7/K I ' Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIIT NO. 3 tof Power REAcro. BUILDING Ptrrt.SSItG SSTEN ee*INN 40 I so aB.sO TENDON iti IORf D'I ON IDENTIFICATION ,UER I-r CUT LENGTH SHoP WASHER ID: C.c __ _ VASHER ID: PC CR 1. CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I DATE 2. Date tendon received on-site __R Number _3. Date Installed In conduit Installation lC ___Wires removed Wi___Lres replaced Total Ineffective vires 4. Date buttonheaded Buttonhesding NCR's bad wires ...... .... Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective wires., Date stressed ___,_Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP? END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. .-.., /K~ Lif t-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual N -,/A Shia Thickness/80 'Ultimate Pressure ...L................N/A Unseated/JBroken Wires Total effective vires after stressing __6. Date Bulk-filled -Bulk-Fillirg NCCs_Tim~e since Installation ________Inlet PrelsAsure _____ Outlet Temp. ______Date end caps Shop Field 7. Data compiled 'by Orga.U.ation FPC QVDate 1-30)- 72 8. Additional'Coments-: 1J fZPM AtAW-Tf Iba- -1 157 SUL-%1JC6 S I 907 716 Vakqg.&f s.co* "; Florida CRYSTAL RIVER V'-IT NO. 3 A le-. 3 Power UIJLDVIC Fki: fRESSINIG SYSTEM 00*94iTENDION hi1STORY TENDON NUMBER CU____ __ T LENGTH _ _/ 0 "-/ _SHOP WASHER ID: Pc Jj CQ FIELD WASUER ID: PC ja C 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC ./o/D, DATE __,P/MEL 2. Date tendon received on-site _ /_ Number____ Qe 79;?_3. Date installed in conduit -9 Installation NCR_'s Wires removed 0 WIres replaced 0 -Total Ineffective wires -4. Date buttonheaded Or. 7_- Buttonheading NCR's Bad wires / Accept. Beheads 0 Total Ineffective wires S, Date stressed /,2 6- 7 / Stressing ICR's Date restressed .... Restressint NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL K..' Elongation -(1500 psiL to 80% ult.)-Pred. /Act. _15 ...L+/-A.1 __.5 5.... 1 Litft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 67 6) .1co 6 ze% NIA Shim Thickness/80l Ultimate Pressure -7 /7'7.'~o -7'A ,7160~ 14/A Unseated/Broken Wires (Q Total effective wires after stressing

• 6. Date Bulk-filled Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since instaillation 816t _122 Inlet Pressure AM -s....Outlet Temp. 0 Date end caps refilled:

Shop Field , 7. Data compiled by Organization ____Date 3te _/ 17 8. Additional Comments:-Ji Aodda CRYSTAL RIVER U'IIT NO. 3 Ahau1 B Power REACrOR BUILDING miI,.re-ssiNc sysTE pw al C@-U-UUI .f,, TtI;I)ONH I'[STORY tENDOtN IDENTIFICATION I4UHER____________ air LENCTH /4Z 2 7 SHOP WASHER ID: PC JJ. I CR Cr1 FIELD WASHER ID. Pc JP'C ) C .R 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I /42O07 DAfF, 411//1)V 2. Date tendon received on-site ,__"________ IlR Number. .3I'OgO 3. Date Installed in conduit ___,Installation NC 4 s, Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective Wires 4. Date buttonheaded _9 ,0-7j Buttonheading NCR's bad wires .Accept. Reheads 8 Total Ineffective Wires _,_ _, 5. Date stressed .3,/-71Z/ Stressing NCR's _ _Date restressed _ _ ._ _ _estressing NCR's SHOP"END FIELD ENT) TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred./Act. LV s jt 4;'" Lift-Off 'Pressure -Predicted/Actual ")of N/A Shim Thickness/801 Ultimate Pressure 5/7 it I6 1i -,77_%o 1/A_Unseated/Broken Wires Total ef ective wires after stressing

• 6. Date Sulk-filled 4 4 $Bulk-Tilling N4CR's_______________

Time since Installation _1QXmokjL Inlet Pressure "55..p.2.. Outlet Temp. _Date end caps refilledi Shop ...._ Field 7. Data compiled by0-o..Z__a 4 , Organization _ _ _ _ _.DatedtoaCees

6. Additional Comments: w~./

4 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT KO. 3 * ,s.4'Power R~EACTOR BUILDING V'itt' fRES SING S'YSTEH n t8 C0066MA146ftt PV B cP-.om.',e. TENDON hISTORY SIDON IDENTIFICATION 11UIMER 7 13 / CUT LENGTH! /A10-SHOP WASIeR ID: PCJ CR _/ 0 0 FIELD WASHER ID: PC_ 18'- CR 1j-1. GAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FTC

2. / Io.L DA.T .________2. Date tendon received on-site OARQ--4 TMR Number M , 01_3. Date installed In conduit _ ./3-39 Ins tallation NC.'s ....Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded

_ _7_- _ buttonheading NCR's /1 1 , Bad wires /1 Accept. Reheads _____ Total Ineffective wires 2...5 Date stressed /2 -7!/ Stressing WCR's Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD LZID TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 8o0 ult.)-Pred./Act. ' -"~I Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual (U1017 00 67O .L( QD 1N/A ShIm Thickness/80X Ultimate Pressure M*j~ b NIA Unseated/Broken Wires

• _Total effective wires after stressing

... .6. Date Bulk-filled .Bulk-Filling NCR's _.....TIme since Installation / 40- r1~k Inlet Pressure _3.L)5.... -Outlet Temp. 1 Date end caps refilled: Shop _._ Field

• _.7. Data compiled by ., Organization

_- _ _ _ _ _Date8__________n_______n S. Additional Comuents:)--..~% ~ .w-= ~- -- -. Florda CRYSTAL RIVER UtIIT NO. 3 Ainaeb Power PxAcroi BumL= Pn=rassm sysE3:.'j, 0 "°"° t.,rsr TEN1DON HISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBC ER/3/ .aeCT LENGTH SHOP UASEIER ID: PC__ CR FIELD WASHER ID: PC CR 1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I DATE, 2. Date tendon received on-site __ MR Number 3. Date Instal2ed In conduit Installation NCR'__Wires removed _ Wires replaced _Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded _-_ _ Buttonheadibg NCR's Bad wires .......... Accept. Reheada ___ Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed _____. _ Stressing NCRO'Date restressed ....... Restressing NCzR'.SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80Z ult.)-Pred./Act. Lift-Off Pressure -PredictedlActual I .IA Shim Thickness/802 Ultimate Pressure N 1/IA Unseated/Broken Wires ._ _ Total effective wires after stressing ....6. Date Bulk-fIlled __Bulk-Filling NCR'. ._Time since Installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop Field 7, Data com~piled by .7Organization _______________ Date 1___ 11117_ _8. Additional Coments: f 9feO_ -_r 4-6z /,) ir'"~ * +"P /60 1Z24)-. -.-- --. - ,* *o. Floelda CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Mb. 0 0,.. -, P wer IoEARCTOR BUILDI::G PO:SIRESSINCG SYSTEH g3~Oa.~au.4sTENDQ!I 111SORY IDENTIFICATION ?uHDE. N 13 .9A, CT LEC ,G'T H -*.1o0 WASHER ID: PC 42 / _ ___9,3 _ .-___-_ FIELD xD% C , C__CAI/qA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC 2._ _ DATE +11//17Y:. Date tendon-received on-sfte %3 -7d RMf Number R3 'op " 0 I. Date Installed in conduit ."- L Installation NICR's _Wires rcoved 0 Vires replaced 4 Total Ineffective wires 0 7L a _ t NCR's o. Date buttanheaded __________ sltonhe'dn C' ____________ Bad wires / ,Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires __D. bate stressed --3-74 Stressing NCR'. x .. ..Date restressed _Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD E:4D TOTAL OOPNlongation (1500. psi. to BOX ult.)-Pred. /Act. ~. J I ,if t-Otf f ressuzre -Predicted/Actual, 6 Za 700 6&29 6 )60O NIA Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure -,PC, N /A Unseated/broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing K_ _Date Bulk-filled B// /" bulk-Frlln, g CR's ......s_Time since Installation /__,__t_ Inlet Pressure g,,0eS/ Outlet Temp, 160 Date end caps refilled: Shop Field'. Data compiled by 22 Organization _-,Xe__._.. ..Date 1, -Additional Co-entst .... ....._n r_* n H N% .,.ria CRYSTAL RIVER Uiu 110. 3Ac, , -: l ..;T FIACroa ? Et:SS:: SYST'EM 4O"a+ .*.-..s- TFI:oO:' ItISTIY 1M. DENT1FATlo0l NLIER___________ 6i? LL-4(6TH A/'Z -o'3P UASHER 10: ; PC /AL .a -FIELD UASHER ID: PCJ CR /CR'GlIQ.A vendor inspection cover letter nu-ber-FPC 1 , OZY5 _ DATE .Date tendon received on-site :.?Q-7L R Number .__ ._____.... Date installed i:2 ccn.uLt I nstallation NCR 's Wires rc=oved 0 'Wires ra;laced 0 Total Ineffective vires 0 Date 104-107- Buttoheadin; N4CR's _ -Bad vwres 0 Accepr. rehoads 0 Total Ineffective vires Date stresse4 0-07 Stressing NCR's &ell. &42'3 Date.restress4- ._Restressing tiCR's SHOP E1,D FIELD M.; TOTAL'".nsation, (1500 psi to 60% ult .)-?:ed./Actb 4 114~ TV' 75 I 9 k f /0 AV?lf-Ol ressure -fredicted/Actual /QMd7IO~.400 'J4; ll Shim Thickness/80% Ultirate Pressure WNL2Z47.O N"/I 11IA+I Unseated/Sroken Vires ._J Total effective wires oafer stressing ,9..-Date Bulk-filled , Bulk-Filling N1CR's Time since Installation -~~r~ Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp. 'Date end caps refilled: Shop __ ._,_. Field ... ..0 Data compiled by. Organization _.._..._Date ./+?/7.Additional Co-ents: e . Florida Power gGAP466900" CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT HNO. 3 REACTOR BUILDIG PRUtESSINC SYSTE)TENDON _C~khe .. S4M.O AttatImina S Fg.UII TENDON IDENTIFICATION I.HEER L ZA // 7LT ._E_ _SHOP ID: PC CR FIELD WASHER ID: PC Ca 1. CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC f __. DATE ____2. Date tendon received on-site .._ Numiber ,._.3. Date Installed in conduit Inatallation NCR's Wires removed Wires replaced Total Ineffective wires ...... .A. Date bu'ttonheaded .. _ _ uttonheading NCR'e Bad vires ......, Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective vires S. Date stressed ......_ Stressing HCDIs Date restressed __Reatressing NCR'sa SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80% ult,)-Pred.IAct. I. ._LIft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual I Shim ThicknessIa0 Ultijiate Pressure J -Unseated/lBrokeu Wires .... .Total effective vircs after stressing 6. Date Bulk-filled Bulk-FlIling NCR'Time since Installation Inlet Pressure ._ _ Outlet Tem Date end caps refilled: Shop Field 7. Data compiled by .. ........ Organization Date *9 4 I MIlA.K/A PO 8. Additional Couments: Pome. -A l -c" /*7 YIr/n.It n A K............. I! r'.or~daCRYSTAL RIVER MITl NO. 3 REZAC,0O1 WLuxLEtC Pr~rE~SslM:: SYSTE-i ?W 817::M4~ IDEN'TIVICATWIl NtDER___________ CUT LENGTH 4'OP IWAS1IER 11)D-. P'CJ/ZI_.. Cit J~IZELD VASHER ID: PCj .:. C~CAI/QA vendor inspecticui cover letter nmiber-IFPC I /OZ__________ DATE 40110Z71'Date tenidon received oti-sfta A9-7 WiR Num~ber 3 1~4 Date installed in cenduit __________Installation NCIK's /4 Wires V=Voed 0 wires replaced 0Total Ineffective wJires 0 Date buttonheaded /-7'gButtonheadin; 1CWs______________ Bad w'ir~er Acceptc. Rcheid~s 0TotaL Ineffective wires /Date stcessed I'j1 Stressing NCR' s_____________ Date. restressad ______________Restressing l:cR~s________________ SHOP E%*D FIELD END, TOTAL agoation (1500 psL to 60-4 ult.)-rred~.IAct. Z&~~ /,V 4 -/-Uýft-'Off Pressure -Predicced/Actual &71LM&A7t G A Shia IhickaesslSO%. Ultimate Pressuve to1 1,7& NI.i42~ 4A-UnseatedjBrokmu Wires 0Total ef fective wires after stressing 2......*Date Bulk-M liad bui7' 'k-rillIng ITCits_________________ Time since installation ..~G 4 tjLInlet Pressure. L ' outlet Temp. ____Date end caps ref 1Usd: Shop __________Veld __________________

• Data comtpiled by .~ ~Organization

_____________ bate _717 ______0177____

• Additional Co~ents:______________________

__________ I Chr/iTAd. UWU~l Wil iio. 3 UTS l MUIR Lu" NUot In-_C acmltmlatfJ0, TIMUSt S_506 0212.l!, S i m o f f " " 11 3 d w .-, l o ol m .."*Wpeuise An. .Ibis l661- Total "p. a .m 11a- ?"*si "".tee lSda.polld "a lore am Tolew!so ailo. lsfetlva for"o roves TIhicsOs etinl. atftetiv Tweetri¢.e of S,. .*op S(ki..) .i...)_ .V -AT) WIOr. Mp I.) fit) liv) lt_. hi.W. 4 .. gCm s.2, 4 9 9 S tsit '0 ! 31r 4 Sl" -A, ILA ALL 121174 .L 161 100 jL~4 ir ~2 I&L ilL. X&t. AL* JUL .9-A JLt S it T 1233 1333 & i14 VIA 162 V1I of&VIA via 6 VIA --*2 33 L.. Ult-aft 9611 At-ij-4NA&Z£ni3 Wd& (M7J i5& jdA M IA A I JS'7.4A 6p'4A"&Ae7T A 79 A4mob-a ---..------ ------ -------- ----------- -----i[[Mi.I 4, Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIr NO. 3 .,B19 Power REACTOR BUILD1IC sNG sYSTE , , TENDOM HISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION N4UMBER 71)a CU OT LENGTH / '*740 SHOP WASHER ID: PC j C R FIELD WASHER ID: PC L ICR 879- .I. CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter uumber-FC I /Ot*, DATE _J//O/,'2. Date tendon received on-site %-____ _ -_ ., KR Number .... I4 3. Date installed In conduit to-/0-24 Installation NC __s Wires removed 0 , Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 A. Date buttonheaded /0 -/( 7 .Buttonheading NCR's Bad urtes, 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 5, Date stressed 11J18-94 Stressing NCR's _______________ Date restressed Restressing N sCR'__SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL I ý~ ongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred./Act. 44____ ______ _____Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual N/.o1 6tIA Shim ThicknessISOZ Ultimate Pressure A LI 7'? 1 7,770 NIA Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing A(015 6. Date Bulk-filled _, fulk-Filling NCR's Time *since Installation 9ý vd Inlet Pressure 5/ j Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop_" Field , 7. Data compiled by Organization _..... .Date 8. Additional Comments: 0im! dLw34)eIV* -..en-4 KJ-2~ Florida CRYSTAL RIVER VNIT NO. 3 Power IEACrOR BUILDIN. OPl "TRESS 6c, ?.p32HItSTORY TENDON{ rDENT1CATION K .. 4 2/3 .o Wu`T H ..__ __.....SHOP ID: PC_ __ C. ,_._ .FUELD VASHER ID: PC --.C_1. GAIIQA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC 9 _ _ _ DkTE ....2. Date tendon received on-site _ TIR Number __.....__ _3. Date installed In conduit la. t__, ln alltion NCR's ____ __Wires removed ... .. Wires replaced ,-Total Ineffective vires _-4. Date buttonheaded Buttouheading NCR's Bad vires Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective wires _5. Date stressed Stressin a CR's _Date restressed Restressing NCR'.SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 pal to 801 ult.)-Pred./Act. I .Lift-Off Pressure -?redLcted/ltual N_/L ._ _ _ _ 14A Shim Thickness/801 Ultimate Pressure II MIA N/A Uaseated/Brokea wires___ Total effective wires after stressing _.6. Date Bulk-filled .... Bulk-Filling NCR' __,,_ _ __Time since Installation _ Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp. __ -Date end caps refilled: Shop -F. Field 7. Data compiled by J , Organization __304,4______" Date'8. Additional Comeents: A',me ke,, --6 K t4ere. fi'~ -Id -(7//iY7~) 7, M-9, 711; S* -on.- CRYSTAL RIVER UNlIr :10. 3Aia5.~:REJCroR MULIMI= ?ris~rP*::s$I,%%#SYSTCi plapzi TEUWON' HISTORY WlIPE.61TF1CATIo:1:1 .-UER CR6____ ILDUS T IMIM _______~nL AHRID: PC__ _____R /(w GAIIQA. vendor inspection cover letter v'xber-FPC 16 / Y.< DATE __1___0 ___Date tendon received on-site __________ .'Ru~ber 22___________ Date Installed In CCOdUitL to1-1 installation 11cr's_____________ Wires removecd _. '91res repl~ced 0 Total Ineffective wires /Date buttonheaded _10 -1(, -1 L4 Butiornheadin; ?:CR~s _____________ Bad wires /Accept. telloads CTotal. Ineffective wires /Date stressed Ip6-',Stressin;c.s_____________ Date* restressed _____ ________Res tressir-& lNCR $_______________ SHOP ~ FIELD EN~D TOTAL ptation (1500 psi to 60Z ult.)-Pred./Act. j"/ii$ M~~L~ 1_"9%LIEt-Off Pressure -?rtdLcteJ/Actuasl "#7Q 14fOAI6~'q 5 Shim Thickness/8011 Ulti~ate Pressure *720 Q 7,6o __ZON/*Unseated/Droken Wires QTotal, ef f ecti':m wires af ter stressing _24L....A.

• Date Bulk-filled

____________ -7kFiln 6C6 _______________ Time since 17nstallation q netFesre44, Outlet Temp.Date end caps reftlled: Shop _________ ield___________________

• Data com~piled by _2,;o5ý t62 Organization

______________ Date 3Z'*Additlonal Co= -ents: & fPIUJ ALMAJ UVAk QdAffIU) UeaLW. Florida Power Pt6A em mw ter CRYSTAL RIVER U1I!T NiO. 3 REACTOR IUILDINC ?RE:'IRESSING SYSTEH TENDON IHISTORY lag. 8 s-22 Pap 822 TENDON IDENTIFICATION z /1z' T0. Unw._m SHOP WASHER ID: PC__ CR _ ZLD WASHER ID: PC CR_1. CAZL/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FlC I DATE 2. Date tendon received on-site I4R Numbe_3. Date installed in co~dult Installation NCR's Wires removed .Wires replaced _ Total Ineffective wires .....4. Date buttonheaded _ _ _Butonheading NCR'siP Bad wires Accept. Reheads ._ Total Ineffective wires S. Date stressed Stressing NCR's ______ ____Date restressed RestreasIng NCR's_SHOP END FIELD END TOTALElongation (1500 pst to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. J -Qd/Lift-Off.Pressure -Predicted/Actual Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective vires after 6. Date Bulk-filled ... .... Bulk-FIlling NCR's -liue since installation_ Inlet Pressure Date end caps refilied: Shop____ ._,_ Field 7. Data compiled by _ , Organization Date N/A N/A stressing Outlet Temp.8. Additional Coments: Kee*,Ae "-"/Z r/- 2 r ... z o r: rre ... ..~ce .' _.Zr e _ J -- / (,'1 "'#% Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNI r HO. 3 A*,mk ,w Power REACrOR BUILDING ?1ESIRESS11G SYSTE M.'a ,,,o, TENDONT 111SI ORY TENIDONI IDENTIPICATIOII NUHER CUT LENGTH 4CT SHOP WASHER. lot PC 12.1 CIL _____ IELD WASHER tD: ?C______ C?.______1. CAI,/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-TMC _ DATE 2. Date tendon received on-site MIR $umbor 3. Date installed in conduit Installation NCR'._Wires removed ___ _Wires replaced __..__._ Total Ineffective vires __ _4. Date buttonheaded _uttonheading NCR's Bad vires -_. Accept. Reheads _ Total Ineffective wires ___5. Date stressed ... ._ _ Stressing NCR*as Data rest9resed _Restressian 1NCR't SHOP E2D FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Fred./Act. I I Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Mttual M .IA Shim Thickness/002 Ultimate Pressure NI14A Unseated/Broken Wires _ Total effective vites after stressing ., 6. Date Bulk-filled ]_ulk-Filliug N4CR*. a Time since installation _ Inlet Pressure Cu Otlet Temp. _Date end caps refilled: Shop yield ___----__-

7. Data compiled by k AZ* 7Organization FPC-Date Yo,__ __ __ __ __7_8, Additional Comments:2 7L) ?4 C 441A 1($1 t /J nS9 34g$W JL 4 CA Ky" 907 716 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 3 Po er RAcrOR, PlttSirESSInt SYSu£m TENDON hiLSTORY tENDOR IDENIFICATION NUMER CU--?_ J5 rT LENGMh U/Z I SHOP IlASIIEa ID: PC MZ i_____ FIELD WASHER ID: PC IVCR 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC 0 1/26 .ZY DATE _ _____2. Date tendon received on-site R__-,.M- '7 -_ Number 424.3. Date installed In conduit 6 -In -14 Installation NCR's Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective Vires 0 4. Date buttouheaded

/0-kb'941 Buttonheading NCR's Bad vires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed /"-4-7_ Stressing NCR'*__Daie restressed _Restressung _ _CI__s SHOP END FIELD END 'TOTAL*.onsation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred./Act. ~~9~ 9 LIft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 1,0 )/,9 t 70O1,&00 z I/A Shia Ihickness/8OZ 'Ultimaata Pressure -j ~ ~ ~ ~ 7/ /'lnsestedlBroken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing " 6. Date Bulk-fllled __ -,_ -___" Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp. / ..Date end caps refilled% Shop ._.____...._Field

7. Data compiled by'______________

Organization_______________ Date -V1IF7/7 S. Additional Coments: 0.K,--t__ nm , = _

• CIdmhe 595.006 Cakuhideft -A Attathmega 3 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER U111T NO. 3 ,r ~I!Ih Power REACTOR uxwnc PRtErREssxNc s~sJTI TENDON HISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATIOtNUE 9 _ / air NUMBER __2_CUT SHOP WASHER ID: PC_____ CR. __ _ FIELD WASHER ID: PC__ CR --_1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC l DATE* 2. Date tendon received on-site __R Humber _3. Date installed in conduit Installation NCR's Wires removed __ _Wires replaced _ Total ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded

_uttonheading ICN8R Bad wires Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed Stressing NCRW ..__-.Date xestressed ....st__ leatressing NCR's __SHOP END FIELD E 'TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 801 ult.)-Pred./Act. I Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual IA Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure I .L.i _ .../A Unseaced/Broken Wires _ Total effective wires after stressing , 6. Date Bulk-tilled Bulk-FttlogNC KCR's Time since installation I Inlet Pressure _-Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop Field __,_ .7. Data compiled by Organization __--__Date _B. Additional Comments ., fie Forodda I Power C~kM .1 S46-O41 Attfdm B Per DU CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 11ACTOR bUILDUIG ESTP, ESSIG SYSTEt TEINDON HISTORY M IDEMTXFICAT1O14 1fl_-ER Tb".o IMT -NG SHOP WASHER ID- PC______ CR _ FIELD WASHER ZD: PC_____ .__ CR _I. CAZIQA vendor Inspection cover letter nmber-FPC I ,_DATE _2. Date tendon received on-site _MR Number _3. Date installed in cotiduit __Installation NC _ __Wires ramved Wires replaced -_ Total Ineffective vires* 4. Date buttonheaded Buttonheadinc NCR's bad wires .__ ,__Accept. Reheads Total Iseffective wires _5. Date stressed Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing HCWS SHOP END FIELD END MAOTL 2lOnlatiou (1500 psi to 801 ult.)-Pred./lct. / _Lift-Of f 8149 Predicted/Atu1al (KMP) /33A. ' I 3%.,/17.?i H/A LOCO -OF* rWIC Shia Tbickness/80% Ultimate Pressure / I .IN/A Vaseated/Broken Wires _ Total effective wires after stressing 6_ _6. Date bulk-fi1led ..... .ulk-TilliLng 's __NOVa Tlme since installation _I_ Inlet Pressure _ Outlet Temp. __Date end caps refilled: Shop Z-6 Field 79 7. Data compiled by j0I ~O rganizatio a R Date~I~-7 .Add l tome,,., Ts era ! j9V.- A 1JAsrE. (L3_-76)MO) "iJ)c4--'Q, 1 4 LS1 jT" b-.W)0~ 'C~ACKINJ AT- AIrJCH~rLAI-L)"li p- -jf~S, s CITIlAL 1V02 WIT O. 2 23ACM, sUtLsiNO iUEIUUmoa srl 3W-Tumo-IMMM uuwuSpum av -TOWNll go* 1 lekaItilo period a"d WI! a" mIIT1oWN -Avg. -I- Slh -Ial: TOW Reacto lids.yore. le.ee 161eblcsl as. hIleegive Porso Pee. Thibmeesj atia. Iloeetivo Teaperature o'E&t cigtil Z.IA, VA strassiag.LLLUz.4 4 670 166 1j 2...1 3Q IM 16 NA VA j iA NAth I.~ .313.3 ILA- r62 PIA 21170- 16116 14 31140 NtL 163 1054 1,33 4 316" VI 163 92 46..d 7* VIA VIA r VIA 1. LC,.-off only.IOI X ..1.. .h1) *.1fM4 VL&" b 16H13 p. NIL 6 W14. ._3 VI 5.5 1m-__S , o i N A P I571 tESU I& I P1A A a dI&.3 4&&OED O-C 6e'asc A23? 722--- -- ------------- -I!! Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNiTr NO. 3 ,.u --.Power REACtOR BUlLDC ?IESI'F.ssING SYSTE?1 TENDON HISTORY rENDON IDENTIFICATION N4UMBER CUT LENGTH /5"0 *~~m p -6 4'~;HOP hASHER I: IN PC 4 CR 9/Z FIELD WAS'1ER ID: PC LAXI CK /Z3-i 1. GAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I /OZ.'Y DATE 91,1/74P 2. Date tendon received on-site 4- I-W RR Number J 9, 73 3. Date installed In conduit -,-/0-r7A4I Installationt4CI's Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded /0 '.1/- Buttonheading NCR's Bad wires. 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed , / "3-_Q Stressing NCR'Date restzessed Restressing NCR's *SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL) oflg5tion. (ISuOOs to BXul.)-red./ct. 4.. V Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual I OU to, ,110 N/Shim ThicknessIBOX Ultimate Pressure 701/4?77 17710 N/A Unseated/Broken Wires 00 Total effective wires after stressing / ,.6. Date Bulk-filled _B-'/i-7 Bulk-Fillinz VCR's Time since Ihstallation 9 Inlet Pressure 4.,. Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop' ___ _ __ Field 7. Data compiled by .-?Organization_______________ Date 3/Z1/77 8. Additional Comments: I K ;- _ I n 'Io .*. .;r', .CRYSTAL RIVER UNIi NO. 3 aubdM 'kVua"'S,* .- a REACTO. CUILDt::G Prr;sr-..sst:SS, .gd~wmTl!:rO!' 1l[STCRY1/2__ __'DON. IDENTIFICATIO:1 N-UQER C) 305 W LENIGTHI/5 ?A IP UAS.ER MD: PC C.l cR FIELD WASHER .D: PC A =/ CR CAI/Q,\ vendor inspectio-i cover letter numbor-YPC /023 S"7 DATE,. _,/3,_/7,__ __Date tendon recei-ed on-site LA 'R Number _ _ _l_,_Date Ins:alled ccndu ui__ ._ __________l_ Installation IICRI's ,_II Vires retoved 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective vires *Date bucttn.eaded Butto...eadina t;CR's lad vires '. Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective vwijs /Date stressed I I.l4-P4 Stressing NCR's 'lr) ..Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP rED FIELD END TOTAL 7,Sg,,, (1500 psi to 60 ult.)-Ped./Act... IAft-Off Pressure -Predi~cted/Actual, I___________T___N____ Shim Thickness/S0Z Ultimiate Zressure Z720 N/A Unseated/Broken Wires _ Total effecttile vires after stressing .Date Bulk-filled 7,ulk-rilling .CR's /, .Time since Installation q4Inlet Pressulre- ~ Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop _F_ Field ____Data cor-piled by .?Organization __,, Date *ZeI17 -Additional Co-ents: At'+ Florida CRYSTAL RIVER NlIT NO. 3 Awadhme Power REACTOR BUILDWGC PRErRESSING SVSEI FWD"* P 5Ioh.l~ TENDON HISTORY TENDON 1 E1 30,8 0CUT SHOP WASHER ID: PC CR ]FIELD WASHER TD: PC_

• CR 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FIC I DATE 2. Date tendon received on-site __R Number 3. Date Installed In conduit Installation NCR's Wires removed ,_ __ires replaced Total Ineffective -ires 4. Date buttooheaded

__ _ uttonbead" NCR's bad vires ._ ___ Accept. Rehead. Total ineffective wites 5. Date stressed .... Stressing XCIC's ____Date restressed _estressing NCRts SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. / /Litft-Of Pressure -Predicted /tual I _ i/A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure N__/A____ A_ NA Unseated/Broken Wires -_ Tottal effective wires after stressing __ _6. Date Bulk-filled _ alk-FIlliag NCR's Time since installation ._ Inlet Pressure , Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop ,., Field 7. Data compiled by -Organization- _. .....Date _____1 _________8. Additional Comments: ..- 4e. ....ArofeIle.-~~ ~ zf 5iPP:),/oAn)(zn~ de/2'~s9 7O " '9 7 FIorida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 140. 3 ,a,,,,.Power REAcTOR BUILDING PISTUSESINC SYSTEft P..,, a ,-"'" TENDON HISTORY*ENDON ID~ENTIFICATIO14 )4UH39R CUTO4 Q LENGTHI________ 190? WASHER ID: PCJ. _ CR 42 9 FIELD ASIER IXD: PC -cm.( 26.GAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC ./03. _7 DATE ._.9/J30/761

.Date tendon received on-site 4 1........

RIMR Number.______________

1. Date Installed In condutt Installation NCRs .....Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 Date buttonheaded

/0" 1 1-74 ButtodheadInk NCR's Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads ......... Total Ineffective wirces _____.,.*Date stressed I" 4Stressing NCR's ______710_____/_ Date restressed RestressIng NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL F'.1ongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred./Act. %37/1/ 4 1,4 _310& .Pro'"Lif t-Of f Pressure PredictedlActual 4'I/O /10 90/0(000,. N/A Shia 'Thicknessl8Ol Ultim~ate Pressure 7%'~l 1.7L.Z? MIA Vnseated/Broken WIires 0 Total effective wires after stressing "* Date Bulk-filled .S..." NCR's Time since Installation g Inlet Pressure outlet Temp. ...2...Date end caps refilled: Shop ____Field .....'. Data compiled by ,z __ Organization____ Date :0',_,_ _.I. Additional Coments: ,,L.k-i p 41 Florida CRYSUAL RIVER UIT N. 3 A r. N Power REACTOR DumpiLD PRLSiEssiNG sysm 4S °"oP'°" _TENDON HISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION ?IUIER Ct '~ UT LENGTHI__________ SHOP WASHER ID: PC CR _ FIELD WASHER ID: PC________ CR 1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter nwuber-FPC I .DATE _2. Date tendon received on-site __k_ R Number b 3. Date installed in conduit Installation OCR's .... .wires removed _--- __Wires replaced Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded B___uttonheading NCR's ... .Bad wires _ Accept. Reheads ____ ___ Total laeffecftive wires ___ _5. Date stressed Stressing NCR's Data restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 60Z ult.)-Fred.(Act. I ...Lif t-Off Pressure -Predicted/ActumalL L .U/A Shim Thickness/802 Ultimate Pressure N/A Unseated/Btoken i _Wire Total effective vires after stressing __" 6. Date Bulk-filled -__..... .._Bulk-FIlling NCR's --_Time since Installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop F___ _ Field _.____._7. Data compiled by,. 4J2 ,._4=--99_ Date 0____A_____

8. Additional Comments:

O&A,,- dYff.#i 11. # A -2.A/ tAe)r-- -- __

• • - ~ 4 d ~raCYSTAL RIVER UNIT 10. 3 ~~s-,. ,

DIUILDI::C PST..SSVU SYST£.'t For33 IDENTIF1CAT1OI .'%-U:MER

7) 3 0. CUT LENCDI 1241 tAP IP WAISHER ID:..PC 420 CR F IELD WASHER ID: ?C j CR GAIIQ& vcnCor Inspection cover lector r~cber-T?C P /0.3 C7 *. DAT E .9/340/79 Date tendofi riceived on-site ________ _I.MR Number Date 1insta .1e i cenduit __________Installation NCR.'s 4396 wires ve~oved /Wires rc~1aced 0Total Ineffective witres /Date buttcmbeaded

/0BI'd uttonheadin;a NCR*&_______________ Bad wires .3 Accept. Rel-hcads / Total Inef fective wires 7.iLI., S.r__sing _____-____,________.______T___ bato stressed SrsigNCR's_________________ Date restressad ______________Restressing NCR's ________________ SHIOP END FIELD E:D TOTAL"Iongatln (1500 psi to 60% ult.)-Pred./Act. Y. .......)"'-Llft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual ~tI Shia Thickness/8OX Ultimirate Pressure I Z& NI/A*Unseated/Broken U11res 0 Total effective wires after stressing O Date Bulk-f illed ____. ______ bulk-Flilling N.CILs ______________ Time since installation I nlet Pressure ;2%. Outlet Temp. .Date end caps refilled: Shop _el___d____ Tieldo______ee_____________ Data compiled by Organization_ _ _ __$Date resY1e1s1_ 7ees____Additional Co=ents: Florida Power*S09GAVIgON CRYSTAL RIVER URIT NO. 3 REACTOR BUILDINC nE33REsS1HG SYSTE1 TENDON HISTORY PapS34 TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER /CU 3T' o LENGH SHOP WASHER ID: PC_ CR F FIELD WASHER ID: PC_ ___ CR ., 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC P , _._ pAT_" 2. Date tendon received on-site -tH___________ aR Number _.3. Date installed in conduit Installation NCR's Wý_tres removed Wires replaced _ Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded

• _,_ ButtonheadIng Nchts , Bad wires __Accept.

Reheads ._ Total Ineffective w1res _S. Date stressed Stressing NCR's __Date Testressed _Restressian NCl K __.SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL dl L Elongation (1500 psi' to 80% ult.)-Pred./Act.

• , Lift-Off Pressure -PredictedlActual J.. HI/A Shim Thickness/80 Ultimate Pressure .H/A Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective wires after stressing

" 6. Date bulk-filled Bulk-FIllIng NCR's Time since installation Inlet Pressure , Outlet Temp. --Date end caps refilled: Shop _Fie Feld ....7 Data compiled by Organization Date 7,ý/?8. Additional Comments: N l m 5-200 ~ V 2 j~;., 6~' ,9c2'z%81 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Power RrAcOR BUiLD Iu G mlrET1GSSitsi SYSTEH AN.%,,M COMP646140ft TENDON HISTORYto 3 ZEFIDE CTIFNCATON NUER CUR LHE//"CT L cA 1140? WASHER ID: PC /4 Z 6! IL WSE D. CC GAI/QA veidor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I "' /035 ? .DATE- -f-3# /7 ,!. Date tendou'recelved on-site 1PNumber 7__ I__ _ ....1. Date Installed' in conduit %T-2244.-T Installation NCR's _.Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 4 a. Date buttonheaded 9-74 Buttonheading NCRI's Bad wires Accept. Reheada 0 Total Ineffective wires /*. Dote stressed /1-A 7.9. Stressing NCR's. _Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL',longation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred.IAct. 7 1 IýLf*OfPressure -Predicted/Actual 6,7 4 e7?tI7 6. NLA Shim Thickness/8o% Ultimate Pressure 16 L N/A Unseated/Broken Wires _

• Total effective vires after stressing-nDate Bulk-filled 3 Bulk-Filling NCR's TMe since Intllto ~ Inlet Pressure 3C if..Out~et Temp, Date end caps refilled:

Shop ,_Field ,_J I. Data compiled by Z92Organlzation _._ _._Date ______________z____z_ I. Additional Comnents: Florida Power) conpOiAleft CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 140. 3 REACTOR BUILDIIC PALSTRESSIiIG SYSTEM TENDON HISTORY O 5-95s.00 Ant.*ru,u5 TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER .s.-/49 .. .-,CUT LENGTH SHOP WASHER ID: PC CR FIELD WASHER ID: PC. CR 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I DATE 2. Date tendon received on-site _ 1M Number 3. Date installed in contduit _Installation NCR!s Wires removed Wires replaced .. _ Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded ¶ Buttonheading NCR's Bad vires .... _Accept. Reheade Total Ineffective vires 5. Date stressed Stressing NCR's Date restressed .... ...... Restressiug NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL)%Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred.IAct. II Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual _ ._ ! N/A Shim Thickness/80I Ultimate Pressure I , ,/A Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective vires after stressing 6. Date Bulk-filled bulk-Fill.ng NCR' a Time since Installation Inlet Pressure ..... Outlet Temp, _ _Date end caps refilled: Shop __F___ ield 7. Data compiled by organization Date *V//77 S. Additional Cemmentsz _&0",e , I *

• Floidda CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Power R.EACTOR BUILDING PILESTatSSlNG SYSTEH TENDON 11IStORY:-.IDENTPOIFICATIONa

,)o A NUMBER C.U .3 soWT LENGTH /.'HOP WASHiER ID: PCJ ~ CR JlQ FIELD WASHER ID: PCj~ CR CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I /O3 IDATE.. 930/, " 1. Date tendon received on-site __ -_ _' _ 4tR Number 3915:7 3. Date Installed In conduit: Inst'allation NCR's Wires removed 0 'Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective vires 0 1. Date buttonheaded _ _ -_*_ __ Buttonheading NCR's _DBad vires' 0 Accepft. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0;. Date stressed j,-il..g Stressing NCR's_Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL^R.longation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. LiI /LI11 in q 1) ,Ift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual NIA.Qb/J_9O jI2 b/Shim Thickness/80% Ultimate Pressure !21s' 7770' J621-17:2 N/A Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective vires after Stressing *. Date Bulk-filled B__,__- __ Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since installation /0fr.0dXL-Inlet Pressure _`9Q) 9= Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop .Field 1. Data compiled by .~ ~Organization_______________ Date _Y///7_7 3. Additional Coments: K .. ,* ..--nn m a am m =-, Cakuhi. 84.4m Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UWIT NO. 3 Aft .*homw Power REAcroR BunLDiG Pa.SrREssiNc sysT*oasem*beou TENDON HlISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER dO 3 /_ 31 CUT LENGT ,,H_SHOP WASHER ID: PC C _ FIEL WASHER ID: PC Cl 1. CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter n=uber-FPC I .DATE 2. Date tendon received on-site I__ HR Number 3. Date installed in condult instaLlation NCRIs Wires removed Wires replaced -Total lneffective wires A. Date buttonheaded Buttonheadin$ NCR's ,_, _ __Bad wires _ Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed __ _Stressing Ct.R.S Date restressed _Restressins NCR's. _SHOP END FIELD END ,OTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 801 ult.)-Predo/Act. .I Lift-off Pressure -Predicted/Actual I j NIA Shim Thickness/lOX Ultimate Pressure IW NA Unseated/Broken Wires .... _ Total effective vires after stressing .__,_ "_-_-6. D&teL Sulk-filled Bulk-Filling NCR's. __Time since Installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp....Date end caps refilled: Shop ...... _Field ....._ _7. Data compiled by Z _ Organization _ _,_Date _-_4 K 8. Additional Coments: _._,,'. ,* -.,_ /#L _!/).LI- .'e a:-t"n l ."- ./ , #kf (7f/s rf7*./,L4, !Zr/Vv Or '. Rorda CRYSTAL RIVER UNir NO. 3 CAktA*&53 M Power REACOR BUILDING rV.S.-rSSING SYSTEH AedawW , w e ,* o ,,go TENDON )JISTORY .339 rAL ýKIDENTIFICATION IUNMER 2,3 CU aT LIN=~ /-V ! .- r3/WFf0 WASHER ID: PCJJ. CR FIELD WASHER ID: PC j Cd5 t. GAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter numbe-,FPC U /03SV7 DATF. ____.__._7_ Z. Date tendon received on-site 4 -IIt'o THR Number , 3g 7S'3. Date installed In con'duit I__-___ _ .installation NCR's ___, Wires removed W Uires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0.. Date buttonheaded /0"9274 Buttonheadlng NCR's Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires <Date stressed Stressing NCR _ _t Date restressed _____________Restressing NCR's _______________ SHOP END rIELD END TOTAL r'ý'Elongation (1500 psi to 80Z ult.)-Pred. /Art. 'A~ N ,ILI -, (If t-Of f Pressure -ProdietedlActual U,7,01Ulo9F N /-A Shist Thicknesa/SOZ Ultimate pressure 24-17190 ..L2 i:ZOt/Unseated/Broken Wires 0. .Total effective vires after stressing 1: Date Bulk-filled 3-,2'-'7' Bulk-Filling NCR's _Time since Installation , Inlet Pressure 4'e,=5.l Outlet Temp. 4 Date end caps refilled: Shop Field.Data compiled by Oo2- 4-; Organization .Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _A. dditional Comments:)-~r..*r -. r. Floida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 ,.,.., Power EAC70oR BUILDINC ,tsus s1 Si STEX Ra 'P TENDON HI1STORY)I jIO DFEtTIF1CAIOI iuiw NUMBE J M /Y 7 CUT LENGTH /6_____-f__ SHOP WASHER ID: PC /Z/ cR e74' FIELD WASHER ID: PC / -Z. /_ __1. CAIIQA vendor Inspection cover letter nu.ber-FPC D 9IZ/ ._//L/7 2. Dote tendon received on-site /2-ZP. 73 VMR HNuber YS'1'r 3. Date Installed In conduit /-_z-7.* 7_ Installation NCR's ....Wires removed w Wires replaced 0 Total laeffective.wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded _-/7 -2y buttonheadimg NCR's , bad wires _ _ Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed 2e.. -Stressing NCR's Date restressed _Restressing NCR's SROP FIELD END TOTAL*?I% Elongation (1500 psi to 801 ult.) -Prod. /Act. IV~ 0.~ Y V~7 D ,(/Lift-Off Pressure -?redicted/Actual 6F-70 1$'/o !dPO0 IM Whin Thickness/80X Ultimate Pressure 7 WO 4, 7780 H/A Unseated/Broken Wires, 0 Total effective wires after stressing /63 6. 'Date Bulk-filled 7-2 oG-719 Bulk-Filling NCR9s Time sin~e Installation 4:; Inlet Pressure , Outlet Temp. lI Date end caps refilled: Shop Field _-7. Da ta compiled b$-Z ~Organization Date .Z 72 7 8. Additional Coments: (-T 907 716 )FIOIkt CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 0. 3NO.Power REACTOR BUILD11tG PAESTRESSING SYSTEM he, Ow GO~eae.'.. ._TENIDON IHISTORY gON t _ 4,'Z_ /el 2- H CU T /S$ -SHOP WASVER ID: PC 1Z/ CR 6 /$1" FIELD WASUERID: PC /C-t ca 904o 1, AI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I _.____ DAT_._____

2. Date tendon received on-site 4/2 20 -7.3 MOR Nimber .7-f -- r 3. Data Installed In conduit /-2Z-7,/'

Installation NCR'S ___Wires removed _ Wires replaced .Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded ,/,.7b .uttonheadipg NCR's .Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed 3'4f-7.. Stressing NCR's .Date restressed Restressing NCR'_s SHOP' END FIELD END TOTAL'Z £lang-tion (1300 psi to 813 ult.)-Pri.d..Ac.. SFna Lif t-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 4,00L 17/ 0 4~7" 1*47SO "N/A-Shim Ihickness/80% Ultimate Pressure 6YI WO7?/ 6 Y 3 S-177" ~ K/A Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing /63 6. Dote Dulk-filled 7- 2 f- / Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since installation g Inlet Pressure /3 outlet Temp. /'V?Date end caps reflfled: Shop .... Field 7. Data complied by _ Organization ___ ._ ---- _,_, Date 1_________________

8. Additional Comments:.

907 716 Caksomm" odd CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Anuebsa Power REACTOR SUILDIVIG FI-STRFSSINC SYSTE, TENDO,4 10STORY.453DOH IDENTIFICATION NUMBER CUT IM9T /7~ anwcr ________SHOP WASHER ID: PC /Z/ CR 5S YIELD WASHER ID: PC 17- / "CR ./00 2 1. CATIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC ? ?P2f D&TF. _.212_,_2. Date tendon received on-site ? .o 2 P -7 ,7 _ RHR Numbet ._ _" ___-___3. Date Installed In conduit /- 12.-7Y Installation NCRIs Wires removed _ Wires replaced _ Total Ineffective vires O 4. Date buttonheaded 4-/I'.-7_y buttonheading NCR's Bad wires " Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective vires 0 So Date stressed z __ -__- _______Stressing Date restressed .Restressing NCIRes SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred./Act. 0*0/5/, /o 1 I /0/y'Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 4P70,&?DO 6_f19 0 H/A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure 7"r,/7 0 -t D j ,77ro Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective vires after stressing f 3 6. Date Bulk-filled 7-2-C. -790/ Bulk-Filling NCR's O Time since Installation _.*,"_i; inlet Pressure r Outlet Temp. ,Date end caps refilled: Shop Field ....7. Data compiled _______________ Organization _________________ Date __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _S. Additional Comments:)qn7 716 Florda CRYSTAL RIVER UI1T NO.3 NOW Power 1EACrOR BUILDRIC PRESTRESSING SYSThL TENDON HIISTORY'* eE.Ij 0H IDENTIFICATION 4/2 .13 / aMT 3.I t C5- / , SHOP WASHE£R ID. PC /Z./ CR 3F W YIELD WASRER ID: PC /22" CiR _'Z3 .1, CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FePC I 11S DATE.///r/;3

2. Date tendon received on-site /DV --Y -7 ..i 5K Number 33 3 $3 6 3. Date Installed in conduit Z/2 1- 70/ Installation YCRIs Wires removed 0 Wires replaced _ _ ._ Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonhesded C 25-4a -.Buttonheading NC10s ....Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total ineffective wires 5. Date stressed 21.3 -J Stressing NCR's .....Date restressed

,_--_ Restressing MCR*s ___SOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Prtd.IAct. t, ,fý e. ve /0~4/d, 'OI "ift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual CU.?O /700 _ N/A Shim Ihicknesu/80Z Ultimate Pressure GZ.G ,7t/ J>'Vr77t PO /A Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing /63 6. Date bulk-filled. 7-.31 -7 4 Bulk-Filling OCR's Time since installation '. Inlet Pressure 2_ .Outlet Temp. /780 Date end caps refilled: Shop Field 7. Data compiled organization_____________ Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _8. Additional Comments: _ .-_._)907 716 Rofda CRYSTAL RIVtR ,ITl NO. 3 F"r-S Power REACTOR BUILDI11C P,,STRSSING S.STE1 TENDON HISTORYý..ZDOM IDENTIFICATION NUMER 112 H 13 .ZY LENGTH _ _' _ __-SHOP WASHER ID: PC /Z/ CR 3'6 1 FIELD WASHER ID: PC ,ZC CR /Z I. CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FTC F 9?20 DATE.LZ/2 0/7y'2. Date tendon received on-site . Number 3.. V 3. Date installed in conduit ___/-_17-7_ _ _ Installation NCR's Wires removed _ .Wires replaced 4:_ Total Ineffective vires 4. Date buttonheaded _ _-27_-7_/ Buttonheadfing NCR's _Bad Wires 0 Accept. Reheads _ Total Ineffective Wires 5. Date stressed -2I f- 7.r Stressing MCI's Date restressed _Retresslug NCR's SkOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi. to 80! ult.)-Pred./Act. iY~ ~ $ t 1 ~ 4/I Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 4C ' A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure e,,- 7'/o , vo "9 HA Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective Wires after stressing /63 6. Date Bulk-filled P 7,0/ Bulk-Filling NCR'*Time since installationZ wo"A"i f,$ Inlet Pressure ._ _0j'_ Outlet Temp. /5777 Date end caps refilled: Shop Field ..___7. Data compiled by ., Organilzation _Date , ,77 8. Additional Comments:)I 907 716 + ) Florda CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 hpS4s Power REACTOR BUILDING PiYSTRESSING SYSTEM42- e C48600949%TENDON II STORY.-4F lDETIFICATION NUmBER A/2 C3U3 ut LENGTH ,-s -SHOP VASHER ID: PC /Z CR 594 FIELD 'WASHER ID: PC /,/i CR ?34: -- -l. GAT/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-jPC 1 7 ,2 0 .DAT_ 51 2. Date tendon received on-site HRLNumber ._ ___,,____3. Date installed In conduit /-/f " ?e Installation NCR's_ _Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded & 2-)7 -71y Buttonheading NCRs'Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective tdires 5. Date stressed 7-/'/o 7r Stressing NCRos Date restressed __ Restressing NCRts SHOP END FIELD ENiD TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred./Act. /,eIfJ d'/ -sr 10, ;"/Y / 10~Llft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual /7000 4f/# 14"1 ToIA Shim Thickness/8OZ Ultimate Pressure 1/8 /780 W NI/A Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing /S3 6. Date Bulk-filled $- -7/ lulk-FiIling NCR's8 Time since installation 7 inlet Pressure A/A? Outlet Temp. /60 Date end caps refilled: Shop Field 7. Data compiled by 4?d Organization-_______ __ _ _ _Date , 17 8. Additional Comments:--- -l_ _ _ l l) : -: :"I : Florda CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 I"p5 Power REACrOR DUILDIC ?PESTRESSI1NC STE.caeo*maow _TENDONt 11STORY ,..TENIDON IDENTIFICATION NUHBER CUT/ 13W LENGTH / s~~SHOP WASHER 1D: PC /Z .CR }nELE) WASHER ID: PC /2/ CR 917 r 1. CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter nunber-F1CI 9 0 DATE- 2/1o/T7 2. Date tendon received on-site /-/4 70/' MR Number 0403/3. Date Installed in conduit /-2/- 7./ Installation SCR's Wires removed V Wire replaced 0 Total Ineffective vires 4. Date buttonheaded 7._ _ -,P_ 70/ uttonheading NCR's Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires .0 5. Date stressed Z-tf-7" Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressintg 1CRI_" SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL-longation (1500 pot to 80o ult.)-,red./Act. r'Ary 5A- , rye-' 1/,0,o IY Lift-Off Tressure -fredicted/Actual ro D/o /7fO 9P7 .A Shim ThLckness/80 Ultimate Pressure 7H/& / 7I'_ ./f I7 H/A UnseatedlBroken Wires _ Total effective vires after stressing /,3 6. Date Bulk-filled 7.71 Y. Bulk-FLIling NCIR's Time since Installation 4 *s,1: Inlet Pressure "P '/ Outlet Temp. /3G.Date end caps refilled: Shop -yield 7. Data compiled by ..? ~Organization _______________ Date i S. Additional Comments: 907 716 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT lit. 3 Pop be Power 41AcTOR BUZLDUC PR,:STP.SSINC SYSTEH-,TENDON hIISTORY'TEtIDOM IDE.NTIFICAT ION NUHfBER 4'2 Cui/ r LEnGm s~ ~SHOP WAShIIR ID: PC /22. CR /230 FIELD WASIIER ID: PC / -CR _ ____1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I 9 0 DATE ZA,,/7o_2. Date tendon received on-site /-/' -7&/, tR Number 3.7 03/_3. Date Installed in coniduit /- I -76/ Installation NCR.'_Wires removed 0 Wires replaced __....._Total Ineffective wires 00 4. Date buttonheaded 77-/v -7' Buttonheadlas NCR's Bad wires 0 -Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 6 5. Date stressed 7. -Z_ 7 _.1" Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elontation (1500 psi to 801 uIlt.)-Pred.IAct. sin /I f/'A j _____) Lif t-Oif Pressure -Predicted/Actual 47?d 164COO 4 f p N/A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure 6/. /775" 7 1 NIA Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing "'6. Date Bulk-filled -J,- 7J Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since installation 6 #w..W Inlet Pressure 1V ~ -Outlet Temp.~9 Date end caps refilled: Shop ........ .Field 7. Data compiled by .t4 1 Organization_______________ Date __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _8. Additional Coments_on? 71m Flofd8 CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Arsatn R RPower RCOR UILDX,,G SYSTEM P*. f,--gS-,.@- TEDOHI hilSTORY..TEMDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 4'- Z Al-/ .LENGTH ,,/, 7 SHOP IASHE R ID: PC /Z/ CR 5_, ' FIELD WASHER ID: PC /ZZ_ ci _ _ __I. CAIIQ vendor inspection cover letter nwuber-FPC 1 OM' ____2. Date tendon received on-site /-/6 -7Num PHR ?4ber 36 0 3$'3. Date Installed In conduit /-Z.' 740 Installation NCRts'a Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 'Total Ineffective 0 4. Date buttonheaded 7-/0 -7%/ Buttonheading NCRI__'s Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective Wires 0 S. Date stressed 7.. -7f' Stressing NCR's _Date restressed NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL_Elongation (1500 pot to 801 ult.)-Pred./Act. 'Lift-off Pressure -Predlcted/Actual P'7/17000 Wr/' /16P4 NI/A Unseated/Broken Wilres ,, 0 .. Total effective a ires after stressing & .6. Date Bulk-filled 7o-3/ -7y' ulk-Flling NCR's ....Time since installation _ ,.=ýA Inlet Pressure /Z Outlet Tep. /./0 Date end caps refilled: Shop ...._ Field .....7. Data compiled by :2~2~r~Organization _Date 7 8. Additlonal Comments: 907 716 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Ca Power REACIOR BUILDIZIG PIlrSTRESSINC SYSTEM U TENDON .1ISTORtY fte SHOP WASHE-R ID: C /Z0 CR 7Y FIEL WASHER ID: PC .CR, //_3 1. GAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FEC I ?2W5' DATJ /a13/Z.73 2. Date tendon received on-site 71 7 -3 RfR Number'. ;t (6 3. Date installid In conduit 1!5 ;-1-/ Installation NCd'Wires 'removed , Wires replaced 40 Total Ineffective vires 8 4. Date buttonheaded 1 l -'u -7 L 1 .uttonheading NCR's Bad vires /3 Accept. Reheads /Z- Total Ineffective vires /5. Date'stressed -7 !j -Str.essin' NCR's Date restressed Restressing NCR's SUOP LNID FIELD END TOTALl Elongation (1500 pst to 80% ult.)-Prel./Act. C /0, __-Lif t-Off ?ressure -Predicted/Actual

• P /4w¥ 1 463: NIA, Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure 7 '/j' 7700 e ./ N/A Unseated/Broken Wires .- Total effective wires after stressing

__- __6. Date Bulk-filled I -4 Bulk-Filling NCR's .... ._'" Time since Installation J4:1 t iekiInlet Pressure _C).,4i~j Outlet Temp. /_0 Date end caps refilled: Shop I lk -2l 75 Field ~ /l. ,~7. Data compiled by Za ize4Organization_______________

8. Additional Comments:...M -71s; -

Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 C,.,.. ,..*.Power REroR BUILDItnC PI;STItESSINC SYSTEH AMhmow , co..o...oe

TENDON HIISTORY e.~.)4DOM IDENTIFI*CATION M4UNER CU#2 OT LENGTH -______V__

SHOP WASHER ID: PC /20 CR 14Z FIELD WASNER Mr: PCL 122,....... i 1, CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I _ __DATE_2. Date tendon received on-site I 0 -I/5 --73 Number 33( e / 16 3. Date Installid In conduit Ins- "- " Jntallation NCR's Vires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires .(t 4. Date buttonheaded 4,/Cf -" 4- Buttonheadtjn; NCR's bad wires Accept. Ieheads 0 Total Ineffective vires /5, Date stressed -72" "7 !" Stressing NCR's , Date restressed ,_Restressing HCR's _SHOP END FIELD END4! TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 8D0 ult.)-Pred./Act. 4re/r/ r f,-ý f, /o07y,/ lo .Y Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 47ZO 16700 4730 Ni/A Shim ThicknesslO80 Ultimate Pressure r*ll- /7700 S-YI& H7'/O iIA Unseated/Broken Wires C7 Total effective wires after stressing /47..6. Date Bulk-f Illed I 1- y- --7 4 Bulk-Filling CK-' ......Time since Installation kh rviojjj" Inlet Pressure 45".4pnil.outlet Temp. 3.....Date and caps ref 1Usd: Shop h--75" Field -- 14--'.7., Data compiled by .4 S4.LOrganization-______________ Date S. Additional Comments:*1I _ 1 L !II I .....: nn7 71 A Floflda CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT N. 3 3,.,5W Power I.&Cr0R BUILDING PRESTRESSING SYSTEM k )_ 6SgOýg~ TENDON HISTORY TENIDON IDEMTIICATION NUNBER CUT //2/* N RIo SHOP WASHER- D: PC_ _ _ CIL FIELD WASHER ID: PC- C_1. GAI/QL vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I DATE " 2. Date tendon received on-site ......M.. um M tber_.3. Date installed in conolui_ Installation NCr!' " Vires reeovod _ Virte replaced Total Ineffeitive irires.'4. Date buttooheaded __uttoeadling NCRI_, Bad vires _ Accept. Raheada Total Zuefiective Vixes _5. Date streased 8treating NCMIR ,.Date restressed _estressIng NCR's_SHOP END nELD END 7oTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 801 ult.)-?red./Act. " -Lift-oUfPresuwe -redicted/Actual. (an jqZSP, 2S* .1~'S (f ____Shia Thickness/802 Ultimate Pressure X/A_______ I- 640 VLOV.Unseated/Brokeu Wires Ca.- IT Total effective vites after streesing 4 2-.6. Date Bulk-filled ..Bulk-Tillifg XCR'.Tine since installation laet Pressute -Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop WYeld ____1_____--___

7. Data compiled by O'rganOrg .izaton .V bats 5-8. Additional Comzents:

%6!57PCff:( MW7- :214VezLg J 4 0 76../O 8 9)~6- _jN2 LCA rOaJ -E -P 9-V4r-- COeRROMTV_)_&ut.-oFP SOR9 (srr o,~A Mw -IS2oV x 00 _-W_ b1RM rJ Or-- C9ALYn~J, Ar- A+/-JCftfj46E5 T 907 716 I=MYSAL sItM It~t Vi 3 SIACTOS 361L315 11531138813 1133_- w~ ZM -fg tufAci tt9 T aIfO No. _ LGH21 4pOptl loa rletvil s6 Avis. WhiE glees- local ha008 Ildi.Force lforce U1411itit ile itlle ,,w ?..tl itoC O 2hiekaeee atiesf Moittilve tomperoare, of OvllSMl S-4 1624. St .. lie stressing Sl lot 14 1456 $ 314 U/A 1456 5 314 $/A 7Foi 1541 1502 S 0916 I/A 2163 114 1556 S 9126 VIA 106 41-.-77/ S L I , -" d'*oetsc Aoupa oaýýSwVr.---- ----- ------ -na ------- -----------------S i INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE AC-XMTLWAM Nuclear Engineering Office NTSD MAC 240-1511 Telephone

SUBJECT:

Crystal River Unit 3 Quality Records Transmittal -Analysis/Calculatlon TO: Records Management -NR2A The following snalysis/celculation package Is submitted as the QA Record copy:PC DOCUMENT o4TlfCATlON NUABI REV. 1 smutClT" OrTAL PAG=STRW4M4rJW S 95"0082 3 MX 68 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves IWOS OEM" MR LAT"N RETIrEVAU Tendon, Surveillance IDXR FPWWEICU CA FLES -ST -1 FMINY FINSli REA 97-1975 REA 97-2110 REA 97-2129 VUO (INOMMMNAMe E40f DocW4 MMW 1DWF1 mWcsMWW Docu,.UMw 1DXAEF FPC (from Parsons Power) WIA NIA TAG PART 140 CoMmENTS 5J5AWE RSTINUMrO. PNOMAEArMY. UTCJ Revision by FPC to Parsons Power calculation Juslng FPC format).NOTE: Use Tag number only for valid tag numbers (i.e., RCV-8, SWV-34. DCH-99), otherwise; use Part number field (i.e., CSC14599, AC1459). If more space Is required, write "See Attachment" and list on separate sheet."FOR RECORDS MANAGEMENT USE ONLY**Quality Record Transmittal received end Information entered Into SEEK.Entered by: Date (Return copy of Quality Docment Transmittal to NOE Supprt Speclaltst.) K 2 I)~.1 DA!IVERM1ATtON JýWNEtDT 4(.iEN.)DT cc: Nuclear Projects (If MAR/CGWR/PEERE Return to Service Relatled) Yes 0 No Supervisor. Conflg. Mat. Info.Mgr.. Nucl. Operatihmn Eno. (Originsl" wlsnach Calculation Review form Part III actions requirld 0'- No Olf Yes, send copy of the form to Nuclear RegulatorWAssurance and a coPY of the Calculation to the Responsible Organizatlon(a) Identified In Pert 0l on the Calculation Review form.1 Paw. 12197 yVh=IOapO ANALYSISICALCULATION

SUMMARY

AC.,SJM lM~I 1W U NO. NlEWSOM Z DOCUMENT IDENTIFCATION NUMBER S 95-0082 3 TI1J CLMIFICATION 2O!Ch= ONO 0 Safety Related 0I Non Safety Related 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves NIWA M1 Mses NIA VV4O0R IDOCUIMB NWM9E NIA Design Engineer John D. Shubert, Jr.Date Verification Engineer ,.Date __.____ 3__ b A__supervisor Dan Jopling Date"lMS RVISE.D--(see 'Revision Description Sheet" for revision 31 PURPOE SUMMAR Determine Tendon Force losses and prepare Tendon Force Curves for additional Tendons required for the 8th Surveillance Inspection. The data for the following Tendon's Is added by Revision 3: Dll.o D302, D306, 42H29, 42H30, 42H34, 42H35, 42H36,42H37, 51H28, 51H29, 62H39, 621,43 and 62H44.AdSULTS ionalFo Additional Force Curves are plotted and attached. 4aM.SAI..CALCULATION REVIEW CuCfYVM Page 1 of 2 S 95-0082 Revision 3 PART I -DESIGN ASSUMPTIONIINPUT REVIEW: APPLICABLE j" Yes 0 No The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the design assumptions and inputs Identified for this calculation: Nuclear Plant Technical Support System Engr Nuclear Plant Operations O_ _ _ _ _ sL NIA Wou0M WA PART It- RESULTS REVIEW: APPLICABLE [] Yes []The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the results of this calculation end understand the actions which the organizations must take to Implement the results.VýNuclear Plant Technical Support System Engr Nuclear Plant Operations Nuclear Plant Maintenance Q Yes 0 NIA Nuclear Ucensed Operator Training NIA sGvgw~gt"M NInfAn~0 Yes[ NIA Manager. Site Nuclear Services 0 Yes [ N/A Sr. Radiation Protection Engineer[] Yes ] NIA Nuclear Plant EOP Group'Yes [ NIA OTHERS: NIA ftrMuffWWO >5 N/A-V~rwa'ftv. 12M7 2CALCAATIO MAW.11 CALCULATION REVIEW Page 2 of 2 S 95-0082 Revision 3 PART III -CONFIGURATION CONTROL: APPUCABLE [3 Yes 0 No The following Is a list of Plant proceduresflesson plans/other documents and Nuclear Engineering calculations which require updating based on calculation results review: Document Date Reaulred Responsible Oreanizatlon i Upon completion, forward a copy to the Manager, Nuclear Regulatory Assurance Group for tracking of actions If\. any Items are Identified in Part III. If calculations are listed, a copy shall be sent to the original file and the calculation log updated to reflect this Impact.PART IV -NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DOCUMENTATION REVIEW The responsible Design Engineer must thoroughly review the below listed documents to assess It the calculation requires revision to these documents. If "Yes." the change authorzatlons must be listed below and Issued concurrently with the calculation. Enhanced Design Basis Document 0 Yes t No CIrc) Vendor Qualification Packagea[ Yes 0 NoIVOPJI FSAR 0 Yes 0 No ce"Kh Topical Design Basis Doc. 03 Yes 0 No Ifcm Improved Tech. Specification Q3 Yes 0 No 9--8) EISOPM 03 Yes 0 No ,fTca Improved Tech. Spec. Bases r3 Yes 0 No !In) Other Documents reviewed: Config. Mgmt. Info. System r Yes 0 No C,1) ____yest U3 No eea ia& ooc. .,g.cl 'J)Analysis Basis Document (3 Yes 0 No ITch .0 Yes 03 No., _ ___1CNAMGI DOC. IJMN"CEI Design Basis Document 03 Yes 0 No TCO) 0 Yes 03 No (OCHAW WOC. rMMMNC Appenix R Fire Study [] Yes 0 No 0CA 0 Yes 0 No Fire Hazardous Analysis [3 Yes 0 No IlT) -0 Yes [3 No 4£NM4GI SOC mENC MNPA Code Ccewvmwce Docuenat [3 Yes 0 No ITch 0E3 Yes E3 No_______________ PART V -PLANT REVIEWSIAPPROVALS FOR INSTRUMENT SETPOINT CHANGE PRCIDNPO approval Is required If a setpoint Is to be physically changed In the plant through the NEP 213 process.PRC Review Required [j Yes 0 No tI/A PRC Chairman /Data NIA ONPO /Date/ DNPO Review Required 0 Yes DES" INESUtATW1 ONo DO"EWiN Z-v-1r IJohn D.NER .A-I-NTED NAME Shubert. Jr.I CALCULATION VERIFICATION REPORT Crystal River Unit 3~~CA.LWRPJFRM Page 1 of 1 YES NO N/A 1. rX Are Inputs, Including codes, standards, regulatory requirements, procedures, data. and Engineering methodology correctly selected and applied?2. 0[ E3 Have assumptions been Identified? Are they reasonable and justified? (See NEP 101, V.c, for discussion on references).

3. [ 3 [ Are references properly Identified, correct, and complete? (See NEP 101, V.c., for discussion on assumptions and justification.)

4. [ 3 [ Have applicable construction and operating experiences been considered?

6. 0 .[3 Was an appropriate Design AnalysislCalculation method used?6. r [1 In cases where computer software was used, has the program been verified or reverified In accordance with NEP 136 for safety related design applications and/or are Inputs, formulas, and outputs associated with spreadsheets accurate?7_ 7. [3 [3 Is the output reasonable compared to Inputs?8. D EQ Has technical design Information provided via letter, REA, IOC or telecon by other disciplines or programs been verified by that.discipline or program?9. [ 3 Has technical design Information provided via letter or telecon from an external Engineering Organization or vendor been confirmed and accepted by FPC?10. [3 0 Do the calculation results indicate a non-conforming condition exists? If *Yes," Immediately notify the responsible Supervisor.

11. [ 3 I] Do the results require a change to other Engineering documents?

If 'Yes," have these documents been Identified for revision on the Calculation Review Form?I have performed a verification on the subject calculation package and find the results acceptable. IMATONMR DATI ,TI K) k / Florida Power Cgo 9-0 i &$10 INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE A"-X.IO J Nuclear Engineering Office NT6D MAC 240-1511 Telephone SUBJRCT- Crystal River Unit 3 Quality Document Transmittal -Analysis/Calculation TO: Records Management -NR2A The following analysislcalculation package is submitted as the QA Record copy: DOCNO 0PC OCCUMENT ,TICATIONUMES .I fiVj, TOTMM PAMtS 41D S95-0082 2 MX _ TOTALPAoEs 153 TITLE 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves WWS W %ft "M W ORLATERWIMJ Tendon, Surveillancer CESetm OR PUS -LIST PRIAMARY PILE3. FsT vC~o iVINMOR NAME) V1N0W DOCUM.NT =tAER CDXRLr SUPMEsED DOCJMTNTS IDXlI..FPC (from Parsons Power) N/A N/A TAG-PAT NO. 7 cOMMENTS ISMA;E RKsCTION3. PRORIKETARY. WTCJ Revision by FPC to Parsons Power calculation (using FPC format)NOTE.Use Tag number only for valid tag numbers (i.e., RCV-8, SWV-34, DCH-99), otherwise; use Part number field (i.e.. CSC14599, AC1459). if more space is required, write "See Attachment" and list on separate sheet. ,-- 'A 6. 2-W DATE jr4 DATE M WPP¶ CfLN %ýiRE$41-1541 QA.A~ tc~*WJI WALA~9, DATE 22z97 B F j cc: Nucloar Pro)ects (if MARICOWR/PEERE Saturn to Service Related) r0 Yes ] No Supervisor. Config. Mgt. info.Mgt., Nucl. Operations Eng. lOrigInati wlattach Calculation Review form Par I t nxY in.,. 0Yes 0 No pf Yes. send copy of the form to Nuclear egulatory Assurance and a copy of the Calctiation to the Responsible Orgunization(s) Identified In Port IIl on the Calculation Review form.)Nov. W, UE..liork ANALYSIS/CALCULATION

SUMMARY

A.C~U4JUIR K._ I-LN, mV ug)OCUMEN" IEEIFICATION NUMBER S 95-0082 2 Tw LASSM1AO IOCW ONO 6th Tendon Surveillance. Generation of Tendon Force Curves ED Safety Relted o Non Safety Related NUER Wle V9moonR OOCMEr NUMBER n/a APPROVAL PRINTED SIGNATURES NAME Design Engineer -s_ John D. Shubert, Jr.Date (.2 *1 -l Verification Engineer X) & _0_ _ ___ wt___'_____ k Date Supervisor_____________________ Date ITEMS (see 'Revislon Description Sheet' for revision 2)'PUPOSE

SUMMARY

Determine Tendon Force losses and prepare Tendon Force Curves for Tendons for 6th Surveillance Inspection. RESUTS

SUMMARY

Force Curves are plotted and attached..) ........... CALCULATION REVIEW C, CAICt"'"M NOAM.Page 1 of 2)S 95-0082 Revision 2 1 PART I -DESIGN ASSUMPTION/INPUT REVIEW: APPUCABLE [Q Yes ED No The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the design assumptions and inputs Identified for this calculation: i Nuclear Plant Technical Support System Engr Nuclear Plant Operations OTno"m~0~PART II -RESULTS REVIEW: APPLICABLE [] Yes [a No The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the results of this calculation and understand the actions which the organizations must take to Implement the results.Nuclear Plant Technical Support System Engr Nuclear Plant Operations Nuclear Plant Maintenance o3 Yes [1 N/A Nuclear Licensed Operator Training 0 Yes 0 N/A Manager, Site Nuclear Services 0 Yes [] NIA Sr. Radiation Protection Engineer 0 Yes O N/A OTHERS: Sogtutumse SVn--*-ftww"Me"ftwOes.SWnW-09)PAW. "? _&0660ý.S AM 1 rki CALCULATION REVIEW Page 2 of 2 S 95-0082 Revision 2 PART IIl -CONFIGURATION CONTROL APPUCABLE M Yes [3 No The following Is a list of Plant procedures/lesson plans/other documents and Nuclear Engineering calculations which require updating based on calculation results review: Document Date Reaufred Responsible Organization SP-182 11-1-97 Nuclear Engineering Programs Upon completion, forward a copy to the Manager, Nuclear Regulatory Assurance Group for tracking of actions If any items are Identified In Part III. If calculations are Bated, a copy shall be sent to the original file and the calculation log updated to reflect this Impact..PART IV -NUCLEAR ENGINEERING DOCUMENTATION REVIEW The responsible Design Engineer must thoroughly review the below Ulsted documents to assess if the calculation requires revision to these documents. If "Yes," the change authorizations must be listed below and Issued concurrently with the calculation. Enhanced Design Basi Document 03 Yes 0 No ITUI Vendor Ouaflfcation Package 000")FSAR 03 Yes 0 No L-0) Topical Design Basle Doe. [3 Yes 0 No (coel improved Tech. Specification Q3 Yes W No "Rer,) E1SOPM 0 Yes 10 No IYcD)Improved Tech. Spec. Bases [0 Yes 0 No ILA-# Other Documents reviewed: Conflg. Mgmt. Info. System 03 Yes 0 No iA r_ _ _ _ Yes 0 No IXWA DOC. PtBWt:K Analysis Bosis Document 13 Yes M No (rcTn __ Yes "1 NoDCC. Ppm~m;c)Design Basis Document 0 Yes 0[ No ITC2 .. Yes [] No ICANGA DWO. MEOU6IJ Appendix R Fire Study D3 Yes M No ITC __ Yes 0 No IOAiIDeC. Fire Hazardous Analysis E Yes [ No IT' __ Yes [] No KWG OC .HWEJA W5PA Code Conformane Doctrnent [] Yes 10 No IrChl __ _ Yes [3 No I4UO5 00c. WErxiCI PART V -PLANT REVIEWSIAPPROVALS FOR INSTRUMENT SETPOINT CHANGE PRCIDNPO approval Is required If a setpoint Is to be physically changed In the plant through the NEP 213 process.PRC Review Required ] Yes 0 No DNPO Review Required 0 Yes Of")GIEMT PRC Chhairman /Date ONPO M~ate~No OEMSa. ENGM -PrMTEO NAME IT-15-"917 IJohn D. Shubert. Jr.-1 Rv, "1?

• • sx uea se CALCULATION VERIFICATION REPORT Crystal River Unit 3 CAMW.MPJPM Page 1 of 1 CA&CULATION UMu IRe'S 95-0082 Revision 2 h T'e cef

' '6 th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves YES NO NIA 1. C t3 Q Are Inputs, Including codes, standards, regulatory requirements, procedures, data, and Engineering methodology correctly selected and applied?2. 1 0 Q Have assumptions been identified? Are they reasonable and justified? (See NEP 101, V.c, for discussion on references).

3. 0 Q Are references properly Identified, correct, and complete? (See NEP 101, V.c., for discussion on assumptions end justification.)

4. 1 Q [ Have applicable construction and operating experiences been considered?

5.0. 0 0 Was an appropriate Design AnalysislCalculetion method used?6. 0 " 9 In cases where computer software was used, has the program been verified or reverified in accordance with NEP 135 for safety related design applications and/or are Inputs, formulas, and outputs associated with spreadshoots accurate?7. 0 0 Q Is the output reasonable compared to inputs?8. 0 0 0 Has technical design information provided via letter. REA, 10C or telecon by other disciplines or programs been verified by that discipline or program?9. 1 0 0 Has technical design Information provided via letter or telecon from an external Engineering Organization or vendor been confirmed and accepted by FPC?10. Q 1 Q Do the calculation results Indicate a non-conforming condition exists? If "Yes," immediately notify the responsible Supervisor. 11.0 -' 0 Do the results require a change to other Engineering documents? If *Yes,' have these documents been Identified for revision on the Calculation Review Form?I have performed a verification on the subject calculation package and find the results acceptable. SVMILA1 I NU DAT RI SOR$ ENGWNUtwc , Ii)Pkv."7 NET.- 0~ NSA NcEftWuI, 912247 W 19 w INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Florida Power GO 1k P O0A ISON Nuclear Engfneering Design Office NA1E 240-3568 MAC Telephono SUB.C1": Crystal River Unit 3 Quality Document Transmittal -Analysis/Calculation To: Records Management -NR2A I)The following analysis/calculatlon package Is submitted as the QA Record copy: 000FMC DOCLNAME W iPCAINFIMMMM NME F. "hES OA M ASfiTTEO n-95-0082 I MX A4T__.15/6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves PEWaSSOMY SEYWOPOS FOA LAM AVElnMA Tendon Surveillance"mm!P SiPN OnR s Fl *W m P IEm FRE m SP-182-tW q -vENoOooIJME4 tb En SWUM=,E DO0MENS )FPC (from Parsons Power) NIA N/A TAG PART NO.m#AkhTS 5JSAME RMCT iO4 PAOPPRIETAMY. Ell Parmons Power calc revision using FPC format.NOTE: Use Tag number only for valid tag numbers (i.e., RCV-, SWV-34. DCII-99), otherwise; use Part number field (i.e..CSC14599, SAC1459). If more space Is required, write *See Attachment" and list on separate sheet.MOM MR "IP'" DATE IWRIFICATIM&GNEER t DATlEM [i" OI4N'.Ar DAME K)cc(jAR office OfI MAM Palatal1)e D. ENO'"Ugr. Nuc. Config. Mgt.Mgr., NucL Eng. Deslgn (OIgInalo walltach Plant Document Updates Required 13 Yes OYA O oYea.jmnd copy of the, CaicufatoTn Review form to Nuclear Uceneing Md a coy of the Calcuistion to twe PRontcni Orgatdon(O Ide, d In Part an twe C ulcubmon Review Imn)NE_ y-_, T_ _ wYtt MNo (if yes. Transmit wlattach)AM am Asvl ET I. of Plorit FIG Nuclou E 9' -In@ Af Flodda Powa,,er li.~e o n tw ANALYSIS/CALCULATION

SUMMARY

K , 1 -"--DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION NUMBER STRUCTURAL -0821 PREPARATION OF TENDON FORCE CURVES FOR 6TH TENDON Ro no Safety Ram SURVEILLANCE INSPECTION VD9=l 0O0AiEMT "UUUR REVISION rTEMS REVISED APPROVALS.Design Engineer 444 ".. k A ftýL Date./ /IXDAply7 0 Verification Engineer _ __-____._ _ _ __ _ __ _Date/Method'* /5/61 ..... .Supervisor &4________"a_____________________ Dat* 10 W1-. 1-1'VERIFICATION METHODS:,0. Design Review. A -Alterate Calculation: T -Oualiflcatlon Testing 06CARIUI BELOW iF METHOO OF VERIFICATION WAS OTHER 1THAN DEIMON REVIEW DETERMINE TENDON FORCE LOSSES AND PREPARE TENDON FORCE CURVES FOR TENDOMIFOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE INSPECTION REALTS SEIMARf FORCE CURVES ARE PLOTTED AND ATTACHED Swaim~~-.W IjM of~ .P~md VNSP. NSw &tiiln PARSON5 POWER GROUP INC.,, 4:3.Vna'on c Gbe-tCornmon.-.,a , ano PPlrSon3, Main ,-.:.v' '.J,,ntod' -R0a' *eao.n9 P- I'C7-* .*610;6 35-2000

• FRA. 16101855.2001 February 11, 1997 FCS-14171 Contract N00821AD, WA048 Mr. W. W. Nisula Contract Manager Florida Power Corporation (NAIB)15760 West Power Line Street Crystal River, FL 34428-6708 Attention:

Mr. J. L ese Re: Crystal River Unit 3 6th Tendon Surveillance Force Curve Calculation

Dear Mr. Nisula:

Please find attached calculation S-95-0082 Revision 1, which documents the generation of the tendon torce curves io accounumudtc 0he inspection date of early March 1997.Included are disks with related electronic files used in the preparation of the data and force curves.Should there be any questions please feel free to contact Dr. Samir Serhan at (610) 855-3209.Very truly yours, Samir J. Serhan, Ph.D., P.E.Supervising Engineer Roy W. Adler RWAISISIbmb Project Manager Attachment cc: W. W. Nisula (NAIB)D. L Jopling (NA IE)MI J. A. Lese (NAIE) Dc'R. E. Vaughn FPC Records Management (CL Only)R. W. Adler(2)P. 1. Hamiltonto S. 3. Serh:mPARSONS Florida Power cORPpOIAT ION INTEROFFICE CORRESPONDENCE Nuclear Engineering Offic NAIE 240-3568 MAC TelephoneCrystal River Unit 3 Quality Document Transmittal -AnalysislCalculation To: Records Management -NR2A)The following analysis/calculslon package Is submitted as the QA Record copy:?pc f DONAEMT MEWME N REVn0 I SYID0 ThGMaa TPASO S-95-0082 0 MX 383 6th Tendon Surveillance -Generation of Tendon Force Curves itDB WC1PY LAME RIMMEVAL)Tendon Surveillance IP Fu OR PUS -USTMOAWFY FU 'Fl V"Di IVENDOR "AMPE VE"hI~w WEIEO DOGMEHIS0X3 F FRC (from Parlons Power) N/A NIA TAG PART NO.COMMOr3 OpBAW IEMUC11ONS, 0#V(JPt,0R. FE1C4*Force Curves for 6th Tendon Surveuillance NOTE: Use Tag number only for valid tag numbers (i.e., RCV-8, SWV-34, DCH-99), otherwise; use Part number field (i.e., CSC14599. AC1459). If more space is required, write "See Attachmento andAIist_9 i9 8arat0,4 sheet.Mamr .-.,.r.e .W.%,r..,,r .r ...n.wH.~.Im~ MW-L W& -ýF9ý0 dA 9411-i;ik4 cumA Office (Nf MAR Related) 13Yoe M No Mgr. NucL Cotdig. Mgt.Mgr., NucL Eng. Design (Odginal) w/atach Plant Document Updates Required 13 Yea 01 No Vf Ye eend coPy of the Calculation Review Iofm to Nuclear Licensing and a copy-of the Calculation to t, Flespon~le Orgw(o diFd in hP N an toe CaleLudon PAwfw lim)AE DYes I1No (If yes. Transmlt w/ntach) CALCULATION REVIEW Page I of 2 c~aw NWV.S-95-082IRevlsion 10 PART I -DESIGN ASSUMPInON/INPUTREVIEW The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the design assumptions and inputs idcntfied for this calculation: Nuclear Plant Technical Support System , Engr Nuclear Plant Operations w -m Ono"mm PART II -RESULTS REVIEW The following organizations have reviewed and concur with the results of this calculation and understand the actions which the organizations must take to implement the results.Nuclear Plant Technical Support System 2/A, Engr Nuclear Plant Operations Nuclear Plant Maintenance o1 yes IK] NIA Nuclear i.ccnscd Operator Training 1 yes [i] N/A Manager, Site Nuclear Services 1o Yes [K N/A St. Radiation Protection Engineer o Yes KJ N/A OTHERS: II-s-IA. 0/A*flftIinDIA* g)p.aus~Oaa. S~gft~K;-d m,..i WEE Lie of fmt FKM *Jgaiku CROM90"tn CALCULATION REVIEW C A GPage 2 of 2 S-950082/Revlslon

1. 0 PART M -CONFIGURATIONCONTROL The following is a list of Nuclear Engineering and Plant procedures/lesson planslother documents which require updating based on calculation results review: Document Date Rguired Resmzonsible Orianization SP-182 3/1/98 Nuclear Engineering Design (A. Petrowsky)

)))Upon amplction, forward a apy to the Manager. Nuclear UeCeiug for traking of ations ifany items are IdMutified In Par UL PART IV -PLANTREVIEWSIAPPROVALS FOR FIELDSEMPOINT CHANCE PRC review Is required If a full IOCF-R0.59 Safety Evaluation is performed. DNPO approval is required if a setpoint is to be physically changed In the plant.PRC Review Required 0 Yes F] NoaPRO n i DNPO Review Required Yes No DNPO /Dot*9E A-I aDateRET: w.h d Piwd Nldain 'a Agralk Elodds Lo=ANALYSIS/CALCULATION

SUMMARY

)-E--- ICOK° m --isI --.oa,. Y o -a 0_ _ 4 4 _ _ 6 1M ~WM Mm__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~dg E~guM£ M L 1J77 ffm MOM v.if.t .fu,.e~z51 VErFATION Ign w A

• Mismate Culculson; T -Quawflatton T*stno CEM WW *V IiEn=O0F V ErAflnMWA5V1)R W4 OEGNWVW (~UL~t A4A l'hej AA, Af~ari 7 /a4-kimAun~ -A4d A&PAe.n,&&.fdPM.r7~Aq C!*.CJLJ477hd 6fAL b2"-Afet -90=6MCe~

.'o c .....Awte-/g.. .... 777 fO LW.4...K)i!raw. 8/0 N~Mt 5xv of mom "am- hufto choob" K,)= rDESIGN ANALYSIS/CALCULATION

• "£'a°e't"" Crystal River Unit 3 Page 1 S-95"O82 Revision No.: 3 This page followed by page 1A The followino items have been revised in the current revision: Revised Affected Add Replace I Remove Description/Purpose of Revision Pae Secti ons _____ _____I............

______________________ 1 X add "Revision Description Sheet" for revision 3 change page number on revision 2 "Revision 1A x Description Sheet" from page 1 to page JA and state that "page 19 follows" change page number on revision 1 "Revision 18 Description Sheet" from page JA to page 18 and state that "page IC follows" change page number of Table of Contents from page iC X 18 to page IC and add item for Revision 3_ ____ _ Descri ption Sheet change data Input tile names to correspond to 11 X- current names (i.e. DOMER3.XLW. etc) and add note change data input file name to correspond to 20 X current name (DOKR3.XLO), add data for Tendons_____Dill. 0D302, 0306 and state that "page 20A follows" 20A-208 X add spreadsheet and curve for Tendon Dill 49 x state that "page 49A follows" 49A-498 X add spreadsheet and curve for Tendon. D302 S5 x state that "page SSA follows" 5SA-SSB X add spreadsheet and curve for Tendon 0306 change data input file name to correspond to 63-64 X current name (HOOPER3.XLW) and add data for Tendons 42H29. 42130, 42M34 thru 42H37, SIH28, 52129, 62H39, 62H43 and 62H444 70 x state that "page 70A follows" 70A-700 add spreadsheets and curves for Tendons 42HZ9 and 42H30 76 X state that "page 76A follows" 76A-76H X add spreadsheets and curves for Tendons 42H34 thru 42N37 94 x state that "page 94A follows" 94A-94D X add spreadsheets and curves for Tendons 51H28 and 5129 112 X state that 'page 112A follows" 1IZA-112B X add spreadsheet and curve for Tendon 62H39 118 X state that "page 118A follows" 118A-218D X add spreadsheets and curves for Tendons 621H43 and 62H44 159 X Include "Original Stresses data" for Tendons D111, D302 and D306 and change data Input file name to correspond to current name (DOMER3.XLW) 160 x include "Original Stresses data" for Tendons 42HZ9.42830, 42H34 thru 42H37. SH28, S2H29. 62H39. 62H43 and 62H44 and change data input file name to correspond to current name (It0OPER3.XL) 894-BlI0 X add Tendon History Sheets for Tendons Dli, D302, D306, 421129o 4ZH30. 42H34 thru 42H37, S1H28, 52129,.......6 62H39, 621143 and 621144 K2 X change data Input names to correspond to current names (i.e. OOWER3.XLW, etc...) and add note REVISION TYPE: 0 Superseded by Calculation Number (check one) b runI Revision 0 Page for Page K'8126 AIM":U e" d ' msr. M W Inghewe Power~ DESIGN ANALYSIS/CALCULATION Crystal River Unit 3 Iw Page 1A/1 S-95-082 1 -,. -I Revision No.: 2 This page followed by page 16 The following Items have been revised in the current revision: Revised Affected Add Replace Remove Descriptloa/purpose of Revision Page Sections _ ! !ix add "Revision Description Sheet' for revision 2..change page number on revision 1I Revislon x Description Sheet" from page I to page 1A and state that :Roe Is fallows" " I Change Page number of Table -of-Cont~ents from page 18 x IA to page 1I and add item for Revision 2 I, _ _ __ SDoscrition Sheet...Change start date Spring 1997 to Fall 1997 3!x change start aate from Spring 1997 t; Fall 1997 change reference to Enclosure 30.to 3usz state 9 x 'Original Stressing Data"--change. Start date froa March 1997 to November 1997 10 Xand change numerical values to correspond to___I November 1997 change data Input file names to correspond to 11, x current OaWs (i.e. OO'ER2.XLW. etc...)revise the discussion about the interpolation sX between data on the spreadsheets 0 x" -change data inpuC file name to correspond to_ current name C(OcERZ.XL.0 21 X revise spreadsheet for November 1997 start date revise soreadsheetsand curves for November 1997 23-61 x start date 64 X change data input file name to correspond to-_ -current name I revise spreadsheets and Curves for Novetmbr 1997 G5-124 X start date 1z6 x change data Input file name to correspond to current nare _VERTRZ.Xt.O revise spreadsheets and curves for N~ovember 1997 127-156 X start date I -change reference'to Enclosur'e 30 to 3ust state 151 x 'Original Stressing Data" and Enclosure 29 to just_ .. _. ....stato *data sheets"-ichange reference to Enclosure 30-lea 3ust state 159-161 "Original Stressing Data" and change data Input file names to correspond to current names (i.e.--_DER2.XLW, etc...)change reference to Enclosure 30 to just state x62 x 'Original Stressing Data" and Enclosure 29 to just!_state 'data sheets"-.' data Input file names to correspond to x Current names (i.e. OCERZ.XLW. etc...)REVISION TYPE: (check one)o Superseded by Calculation Number o Full Revision 0 Page for Page 445"'S sriOn. Ulf of s P I5P 194-0 5, ."~ Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 ,t On CoM Page J.%Calculation S-95-0082 3 A3 Revision No.: I This page followed by page IC This fbrm shall be used to mcord &.a purpose or reason for the revision. indicata the rcvision pages and/or aff'ectd sections and give' a short description of the ravision. Check (X) the appropriate function to add.re-placc or remove the affc.tc-d pages.Revised Affected Add Replace Remove Description/Purpose of Rcvision Pages Sections -1 X Add revision description sheet.LA x Change pane number from t to LA. Add item for revision description sheet.3 X To ch.nge start date for the 6th surveillace inspection from March 1993 to March 1997 10 X To change start date for the 6th surveillance -...inspection from March 1993 to March 1997 Is X To change start date for the 6th surveillance ...._ _ _inspcction from March 1993 to March 1997 21 X To change start date for the 6ft surveillance inspection from March 1993 to March 1997 23-61 X To change start date for the 6th surveillance ___ _ _ Iinspection from Mvarch 1993 to March 1997 6 To change start date for the 6th surveillance ....... insp.',-cuon ,ftrom March 1998 to M a tch 1997 , 127-136 To chang e start date for the 6 th surveillan ce inspection from Miarch 1993 to March 1997 A--4 -". :" 1 I )REVISION TYPE: I check I I SUPEUSEDED BY CALCULATION NUMBER I I FULL REVISION I X I PAGE FOR PAGE a a? .eq 0 ixAM wtsp, r -a" =I K a DOCLuMEM IDEN7 9E()Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 CO8PORAION Page IC fUIC.1ION NO. R~ISOKN Calculation S-95-0082 3 CTION TITLE CALCULATION COVER SHEET REVISION #3 DESCRIPTION SHEET 1 REVISION #2 DESCRIPTION SHEET IA REVISION #1 DESCRIPTION SHEET lB TABLE OF CONTENTS IC R3 1.0 PURPOSE 3 2.0 DESIGN INPUT 3 3.0 COMPUTER CODES 4 4.0 ASSUMPTIONS 4 5.0 SCOPE AND TENDON SELECTION 4 6.0 CALCULATIONS 9 6.1 GENERAL BACKGROUND & SCHEDULE 9 6.2 FORCE CURVE GENERATION PROCEDURE 11 6.2.1 PREPARATION OF INPUT DATA 11 6.2.2 PROCEDURE FOR DETERMINATION OF TENDON LOSSES 11 6.3 DOME TENDONS 19 TENDONS LISTING & DATA INPUT TABULATION 20 INDIVIDUAL TENDON LOSSES WORKSHEET & CURVES 21 6.4 HOOP TENDONS 62 TENDONS LISTING & DATA INPUT TABULATION 63 INDIVIDUAL TENDON LOSSES WORKSHEETS & CURVES 64 6.5 VERTICAL TENDONS 125 TENDONS LISTING & DATA INPUT TABULATION 126 INDIVIDUAL TENDON LOSSES WORKSHEETS & CURVES 127 6.6 CALCULATIONS SUPPORTING SP-182 157 RET: uLe o Plant R93P. N. Almlr Emgln"mat Aft Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 2 Calculation S-95-0082 o 5ECTION 7.0 8.0 9.0 A.B.C.D.E.F.G.H.1.J.K.TITLE CONCLUSIONS REFERENCES ATTACHMENTS DESIGN INPUT FOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE TENDON DATA HISTORY SHEETS FOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE TENDON STRESSING SEQUENCES EFFECTIVE WIRE SUMMARIES AND TENDON WIRE DATA ELASTIC SHORTENING REFERENCES DATA WIRE STRESS RELAXATION REFERENCE DATA CONCRETE CREEP REFERENCE DATA.CONCRETE SHRINKAGE REFERENCE DATA NORMALIZING FACTOR REFERENCE DATA HOOP GROUP PLOT OF TENDONS ELECTRONIC FILES INFORMATION & DISKETTES 162 162 to 163 At TO AIS BI TO B92 CI TO C24 DI TO DI0 El TO E9 FI TO F8 GI TO GI4 HI TO H8 It TO 123 Ji TO Js EI TO K2 K~j))I WfT: Lt d NF% RZ2. 0bclew Ef£ieuqg SFlorida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 DcdVM1A ~Page 3 Calculation 8-95-0082 2 1.0 PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE Me CR3CsP.DOC (Word 4.0)Th1 purpose of this calculation is to provide tendon force curves for Florida Power Corporation for the Crystal River Unit 3 facility in support of the upcoming 6th tendon surveillance period scheduled for the Fall of 1997. Specific tasks to be performed as part of this scope include the following: A.) Determine the predicted tendon losses and develop forcedime curves for each of the selected tendons for the upcoming sixth surveillance period. Generate the tendon force curves for the selected tendons, the tendons adjacent to the selected tendons, and alternate tendons. Alternate tendons are tendons not specifically scheduled for this surveillance but force curves are prepared to be available in case a substitute tendon should be required during the surveillance. In addition, force curves for a group of tendons deferred/exempted from the previous surveillance will also be prepared. These are discussed in detail in Section 5.0.B.) In addition to the force curve development, other calculations which are required to support Enclosures included within Surveillance Procedure SP-182 will also be prepared within this same calculation.

2.0 DESIGN

INPUT Design input information has been reviewed and is included as Attachmnct A to this calculation. Note that there arc no significant changes to the basic criteria and related documentation which address the licensing of the CR3 plant with respect to the tendon surveillance program. The previous surveillance efforts completed various studies and addressed the CR3 tendon program and its' compliance with U.S. Regulatory Guide 1.35, Revision 3, since it was formally issued in July 1990. Based on FPC licensing efforts and Technical Specification revisions performed at the time of the last surveillance period, as well as recent discussions with the NRC, FPC has now committed the CR3 tendon surveillance program to be performed in accordance with U.S. NRC Regulatory Guide 1.35, Revision 3 (Reference 3).U.S. Regulatory Guide 1.35.1, Revision 0 (Reference

4) is a daughter document referred to by the above Reg.Guide and deals specifically with the calculation of individual tendon losses and the generation of tendon force curves. While calculation efforts for the CR3 tendon force curves have followed closely with both of these Regulatory Guides as they evolved through the 1970's and 1980's, the format and current procedure for the preparation of the force curoes is not in exact compiance with Regulatory Guide 1.35.1 Revision 0 as issued in 1990. The method and approach used in the generation of the CR3 force curves is superior to that of the Reg. Guide in that a specific curve is generated for each individual tendon. Based on the discussions held with the NRC and the results of their review, the method and approach used for these calculations shall be the same as used for previous surveillances.

Sec the Attachment A information for further discussion and references to recent correspondence and documentation with the NRC on various issues related to the tendon surveillance program.Applicable Technical Specification sections, as well as FSAR sections were also reviewed for this cffort.They support the position noted above on the FPC commitment to R.G. 1.35, Rev. 3 and are discussed and) referenced within the Attachment A information. I Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 CORPOMAO Page 4 Calculation S-95-0082 7 3.0 COMPUTER CODES This calculation package is being prepared using Microsoft Word, Version 6.0 and Microsoft Excel, Version 5.0. Spreadsheets from earlier surveillance efforts were prepared using Lotus 123, Release'2.01 and 3.0 and were convened to Excel format for this calculation. All input and calculations are manually checked and verified, therefbrc, verification of computer programs is not applicable or necessary. I 4.0 ASSUMPTIONS Any assumptions made arc noted and contained within the calculation package. None requi e future confirmaton.

5.0 SCOPE

AND TENDON SELECTION Tendons were selected for the sixth surveillance period in accordance with the requirements of Reg. Guide 135, Revision 3 and using the same methodology as was used in the past surveillance. Basically. a random but representative sample was selected and checked at the site for accessibility. Specific citeria used for this selection process is summarized as follows: Tendon Selection Process The tendon selection process has remained the same as that completed for the last several surveillances where a random but representative sample is selected for inspection and testing. The intent is to get as many new and never tested tendons in the sample population, but still keeping one control tendon from each major tendon group to be investigated in each surveillance. Note that this current method differs from methods used during the early life of the plant where some tendons were repeated for inspection every third surveillance. Basically, the selection criteria and process used considers the following: 1.) Select tendons based n Reg. Guide 1.35 Revision 3 Based on the good reults of prior surveillances, the Reg. Guide requires a minimum of I I tendons to be inspected, including 5 hoop, 3 vertical and 3 dome. Tendons should be selected which were never previously inspected or tested. Previously detensioned and retensioned tendons should not be included (unless there is a specific need to investigate the tendon per item 3 below). In addition to being selected at random, tendon selection should be representative of various areas and conditions. For example, the hoop tendons selection was based on random selection but also considered what tendons were inspected in the past and in what hoop area. A plot of previously inspected hoop tendons was prepared to track tendons inspected by grouping (i.e. 13's, 42's, 35's, 46"s. 5 1's, and 62's). Therefore, the selection process considered those sections not equally represented by as many tendons as completed within other sections from prior surveillances. See Attachment J for various plots and information of the hoqp group. The same procedure was applied to the dome group (i.e. 100's, 200's & 300's groups) and to the vertical group (i.e. 12's, 23's, 34's, 45's, 56's & 61's & quadrants). See Attachment D for groups information. METI .Uk d P RE up:, Ndoat Emgn~M Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 COAPORAICP o__ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Page65)U)4 Calculation S-9S-0082 2.) Maintain Control Tendons to be completed each surv.llance. The Reg. Guide also requires a control tendon from each group to be inspected erfy survcillane for comparative purposes. CR3 W not had control tendons since the first surveillance. The concept was introduced probably in the fourth surveillance. Tendons D212, 12VI and 5 1H26 were probably the original control tendons since about the time of the fourth surveillance. They were intended to be inspected during the fifth survllance but the group of tendons selected was based on the surveillance being performed during an outage. FPC decided to complete the Sth sunrvillance during normal plant operation and the original tendons selected wcre affected because many tendons were located within the area of the plant steam vent zone. This included the above three control tendons, and three new control tendons, D215, 34V6 and 46H29 were selected for completion of that surveillance. A problem with 46H29 during the 5th surveillance forced the selection of another control tendon, 46112 1, for the hoop group. New control tendons may need to be selected periodically if the tendon has a problem and is ever detensioned and/or retensioned. As earlier surveillances on CR3 did repeat some tendons, the selection of these other control tendons was easily done from several good candidates. New control tendons should be selected from those previously inspected as far back as possible and cannot be one previously detensioned and/or retensioned. A tendon inspected in more than one prior surveillance is preferred. Based on the above, it is recommended that both of the above two sets of control tendons be used by FPC as control tendons, with one set of three to be utilized in the 6th surveillance during a plant outage, and for the other three to be used in any future inspections scheduled to be performed on-line.3.) Consider any tendons with problems or abnormal conditions as reported by plant personnel. Any leaking tendons or tendons with any reported problems should be considered within the scope of the surveillance. Also, past inspection reports and records should be checked for open items, recommndations, or noted problem tendons.4.) In the selection of tendons for detcsioning, (one per group is required per R.G.) consider the number of effective wires as recorded in the tendon history sheets and summarized in the effective wire summary in Attachment D to thi calculation. As any tendon is to be considered ineffective if it has less than 155 effective wires per the FSAR, it is therfore not ddesirable to select a tendon with many missing, cut or ineffective wires. Unless there was a specific need to detension that particular tendon, doing so could therefore render the entire tendon as out of service. Only a maximum of 3 tendons are allowed out of service at one time per criteria in the FSAR.5.) The reduced force dome tendons are not normal candidates for normal liftoff testing per SP-i 82, Enclosure 8.6.) Tendons adjacent to the selected tendon may require testing and should also be feasible to inspect and test.Adjacent tendons in the dome should not include any reduced force dome tendons. Jump to the next regular dome tendon for the required adjacent tendon. Also, adjacent tendons of the lowest hoop tendons (#I) shall be considered as the two'diretly above the selected tendon. Adjacent tendons of the highest hoop tendons (#47) shall be considered as the two directly below the selected tendon.7.) One alternate tendon should bc selected from each group, and the two adjacent tendons of these alterates at least considered for possible inclusion. WE: Lft P0' R" W o mawp NO~ gbiLate I Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION k) Power Crystal River Unit 3-c oricI. Page 6 Calculation S-95-0082 In addition to the above selection criteria, there arc several other factors which have influenced the scheduling of actual field inspection and testing. These include: A.) Steam Vent Zone -Plant steam venting can impose a safety hazard to personnel during plant operation and early modes of shutdown. Tendon work in the range between 0 and 120 degrees is affected during plant operation by the potential steam venting of the plant. Tendon work in this area must be held off until the potential hazard is eliminated or other approval is obtained fiom plant operations. Note that for the fifth surveillance per FPC operations, this even includes the outside tendon caps of the affected butresses at 0 and at 120 degrees.B.) Fuel Pool Area -Work over the fuel pool can only be performed while missile shields are in place. (Nureg 0612 reqint.)C.) Plant Interior Work -Work inside some plant areas is difficult due to access problems, high radiation areas, interferences, ram accessibility, etc.Deferred/Exempted Tendons After the tendons were selected for the fifth surveillance for an outage surveillance, it was decided that the 5th survcillance would be completed during normal plant operation. A group of tendons originally selected for inspection during that surveillance had to be exempted f(rm that surveillance due to their proximity to the main steam vent zone and the associated hazards with woffing in that area. FPC discussed this issue with the NRC and has documented the following 8 tendons as deferred tendons:Lth d Rant Rer.Ma.Nclow eq 0 y lorida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 7..C.lI. NO.Calculation S-95-0082 rou I D1 15 Never inspected in any surveillance. D212 Inspected in Surveillance 3 and 4.Considered as Control Tendon for outage condition. D3 11 Never inspected in any surveiance. 12VI Previously included for liiftoff testing in the 3rd and 4th surveillances. Considered as Control Tendon for outage condition. 42H44Never inspected in any surve illnce.511126 Previously included for liftoff testing in the 3rd and 4th surveillances. Considered as Control Tendon for outage condition. 53H46 Never inspected in any surveillance. 621146 Never inspected in any surveillance. K-I-J As FPC has mnmittod to t"e NRC to addrcss the above tundon within the upcoming 6th surveliancc these tendons were considered in the scope of this calculation. The 6th surveillance is scheduled to be completed during an outage. Since three of the above exempted tendons were also previous control tendons, it was onidered ta thee tendons can again be used as control tendons for this surveillance instead of the 3 control tendons used in last surveillance (when the surveilance was done on-line). Therefore, the three exempted control tendons can be considered as three of the 11 tendons required per Reg. Guide. A total of 16 tendons should be inspected during the surveillance with three additional alternates selected. Note however that the scope of this calculation will include force curves to be regenerated for the other control tendons, D215, 34V6 and 46-21.A complete historical record of all tendons included in all prior surveillances, along with the list of selected adjacent, exempted and alternate tendons which are planned for in the 6th surveillance is provided on the following Table.){8 ET. Life of PW*i ft6P. MA* Enpame" 3LML.14NCZ, PO lT SXU"VERI 3W31RM, 3 o L 4TM ..U.LM= S ETISUQA= qmxE*TJ. o 33,MM1TP"m Y 2'1TOS1 $OWN1 MW03143" Imunioianiu inmo um* PALL19 34?"kP3 I flT7T 3'ifl TO*11111 IIt OIT

• l/O I177 OIJN. .. Sr SI'I'wV76 IvZAR YEARS MARS IIYEARS 7Y..AERS .YIEARS .SUOAyDATA RInEQV3TO Davd0 21 TOT-101t VO 23T.101.M V.SD 21 "wr.IwcWV.so II 0741U.LIVO I I OT-..VPr .i t TOT-=.."" .ns WT7m. Y.2.11 AiAZ.L*INSPECTED 2$ 1TOl'T.IV0irVD Z3104TV*IUrSD 21 iT*ri01UW.s I

1lT410,..D

• *Da P T IOT.4I3K[.220 3? BASIS Sp-*13.P4"IP-63 S-2 M1-83 sP*Ill TOTAL- 16 81P*Sfl.31.4454 PJlY- PLEYG RErV? PSISIl II *cc Rzm DATE 3.27.10 a 4IO v" 5'11r2, vim 4 0 Dcm12TOtu DiI3n Din2 D123 Dios V DI$M P.C 0212 I.Z 22. , 3 TENDONS IDQTAL D225 0140 i215 R W212 PLC 0231 9
• 0204 D . SGR.OWSSOF41 v2ni D 4 D =212 2 !2 A , O1is
• TODATE .n IDiImDM. D2iS 2 .21 0'22 P , D .PI 1340 V.031 A .lW~tEAL2TPv9 W19 M2V2 l~vo lUvi I.e 1414S P.C
• uvo P.CX *2VET.MMONS 144 TOTAL 12V20 2120 f R SV t v4 EI$ D , IV2311 DD
• PEC 0 GRNMIPF 24 t"V 2m 14V19 V Ii D sm* D ,1 232 , TODATh 12.34.545.

413 2MI 3m1 4s136 .62116 A 441' MV4, Ml .3P0AWNTAL1r, D,*100 131110 12 1 1Mat a 3110 *11to14 P.CIw M as5K1097mm 20 TOTAL )I1.i9 131031 0 131444 1M140 D M1*41 Mae 1b]s1 m 1.3113)? MW*1 423 s11136 9 ea09 c2iwI) .law T* ODATU I,33344. 4, 13111 911110 423144 53313 Ga1in ADL.1 , 421144 E$TENDNS PE11 R I 5313311n sl1msI 51112 4Mt 4m E .IDw L 6203 2 64i0 5111131 51311 d41100 AML , 014I 0 40w1 ISW?' 53105 4al1 D .I42,6 E .481137 D 5314" 42134 =12 A TOTALTDOS a So4 4d34s 411142 44n10 D... S .... *.... ,,.,=.- . .. ...* ,.a .-. --, .. n ..n.=., , .. .._ .. a.... 8 .. *n...7UTALDtS*gCTW 23 22 21 I1 14 .16IALT. , T10AL4 1.30214- &.ALTERNATE ADL.ADhACENT ac. C%7RTE A DEEN1014ToV a METNaIONIM L. EXE&Gq730PJ!Rzm r10*42M1 Sill. R. RMPATWD 1.31704234v _______ NJ 9p-!C, Ce.9 0)S.5 C.9 U'a 0m I-I-a I Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 9 Calculatlon S-95-0082I 2 6.0 CALCULATIONS

6.1 Gcncral

Background and Schcdulc Information General Background Tendon forces curves are to be prepared for the upcoming 6th tendon surveillance period at CR3. From the basic criteria as presented in the Design Input Section, as well as from several discussions with Mr. Joe Lose of Florida Power & Light, it was determined that the criteria for this surveillance period has not changed since the last surveillance efforts. A review of Tech Spec and FSAR criteria confirms the FPC positions with respect to the tendon program. Supporting work for this surveillance period will be based on the same criteria that was used and accepted in the previous surveillance periods.Tendon losses have been calculated in the past per the Rcfcrcm= 8, 9, 10 and I Idocumcntation. Individual tendon losses include the following." Force loss due to elastic shortening of the containment as a result of the prestressing process and the particular sequence of tendon stressing." Force loss due to the stress relaxation of the tendon wires." Loss of prestress force due to the creep characteristics of the concrete structure." Loss of prestress force due to the shrinkage of the concrete structure. Based on some earlier calculations made for tendon losses per the Reference 1 document, Lotus spread sheet templates were prepared for tendon losses calculations for the 4th tendon surveillance calculations. See References 9 & 10. These templates were reran and tested for their accuracy and validity for the fifth surveillance. In addition, the procedure for the gatering of all input data was automated in the fifth surveillance to the format presented herein. Numerous test cases were ran to duplicate forcm curves prepared in the past There were four master templates prepared for the fourth surveillance; one for the hoop tendons, one for the vertical tendons, and two for the dome tendons. The dome tendons are divided into two groups;one for tendons with an original stressing sequence below 27, and the other for tendons with stressing sequences above 27.Based on the work previously accomplished in the prior surveillances, new spreadsheets were prepared this surveillance using Microsoft Excel for the collection of input data and for the calculation of tendon losses ncedcd for generation of force curves. The generation of the force curves was also automated this surveillance by using Excel to plot the graphs. The organization of most data used for this calculation was setup into Excel workbooks with subfiles built and included in each workbook. There is a separate workbook for each of the three tendon groups and each one contains the following:

1. Tabulated input data* Original tendon stressing sequences.

• wire summaries.) "Original Stressing Data" calculations for SP-182.e Separate fils including each tendon loss spreadshect, plot data and an individual force curve. Ig Additional information on electronic file names etc. used in this calculation is provided in Attachment K.

r I K AFlorida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3) CCAPui1oH ..,Page 10 DOLUN nToN NO. Calculation S-95-0082 2 Schedule Information The expected timing for the sixth surveillance is Fall 1997. A date of Novembcr 1, 1997 will be used as a bases for determining the predicted values of base, 95% base and 90% base and labeling this information on the force curves. This allows for ficld usC and decisions to be made based on the requircmcnts of Surveillance Procedure, SP-182.The scales of the force curves are based upon previous surveillance efforts. Thc x axis is a log scale in time representing the time after average date of dome or wall concrete placement, in years. This scale is labeled at the top of each curve. Force curves are plotted using the actual log scale points for the x axis (not the scheduled surveillance years after SrI) versus the calculated tendon forces in ldps on the y axis. The scale at the bottom of the curve for scheduled surveillance periods afte SIT are for ease and readability relative to rcgular scheduled surveillances per Reg. Guide 1.35, Revision 3.Most of the CR3 surveillances were performed on the regularly scheduled years, however, the 5th surveillance was actually performed in the 17th year after SIT. Note that the containment Structural Integrity Test (SIT)was performed in November 1976.For the domc tndons force curves, the point on the bottom scale at SIT corresponds to the log sce at the top of 2.5 years. Therefore, a corresponding log scale data point must be determined for curve plotting for the period of the 6th surveillance. Based on a date of November 1, 1997 for the Fall 1997 surveillance, the length of time between November 1976 (@ SIT) and November 1, 1997 is 21 years. Since the dome group at SIT is at year 2.5 on the log scale, thc 6th surveillance will correspond to (21.0 + 2.5) or 23.5 years on the log scale. L The same procedure must be performed for the hoop and vertical groups as they have different reference points on the log scale for time after concrete wall placement. Both hoop and vcrtical groups are the same with SIT corresponding to year 4.4 on the log scale. Therefore, the 6th surveillance period will correspond to (21.0+ 4.4) or 25.4 years on the log scale.1 l2 A vertical line will be shown on the force curves at the point of the next surveillance and the calculated values of base, 95% base and 90% base representing points on the curves at that time will be included on each of the curves.RETZ. WeW Plan RESP: Mkacem Eagveaw AR& Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 DO W Page 11 Calculation S-95-0082 3 6.2 General Procedure for Force Curve Generation The same procedure within the calculation for the preparation of the force curves for the fourth and fifth surveillance periods will be followed.6.2.1 Preparation of Data Input Spreadsheets In each of the Excel workbooks is a data input file where data from source calculations and current tendon history sheets has been tabulated. See DOMER3.XLW (DOMEINP), HOOPR3.XLW (HOOPINP) &VERTR2.XLW (VERTInP). The compiled books of tendon surveillance historical information, as updated to include the results of the fifth surveillance, provide key input data for the development of force curves. See References 12, 13 & 14. The selected tendon history sheets related to this surveillance have been included herein as Attachment B of this calculation. The Reflrce 11 calculation is essentially a source calculation for this procedure with the Rcfcrence 8 & 10 calculations also providing information. Notes and refcrences related to the tabulation of the data on these spreadsheets arc shown on the individual ~sheet. Ile data input tabulations ame presented as the first sheet within the following Secdons 6.3, 6.4 & 6.5.6.2.2 Procedure for Determination of ndividual Tendon Losses The procedure for the tendon loss calculations, as derived from the reference documentation, is as follows: 1.) Calculate original force in the tendons The original force in the tendons is detcrmined as follows: rActual~lfiqff Pressure1 ORIG.FORCE = 0.7 *Pressure x WireFactor Pr edictedLfloff Pressej Where: fa -240 Ksi, typical for all CR3 wires.Wire area = 0.07685 in2 per Appendix F of the Rcfcrcnec I I calculation. Fk (Kip Force)= Tendon Area (in2) x f&, (Ksi) -0.05985

• 240 Tendon Area (in2) = Arca/Wire (in2) x No. of Wires. (Considered by wire factor.)Actual and predicted original liftoff prcssures are obtained from Tendon History Sheets References 12, 13, Kj 14, with those within the scope of this calculation attached in Attachment B.Refer to the Appendix F part of the Reference I I calculation, for source data of above formula. The above expression was used as the basis for the calculations for all the shop and field end forces calculated on the Data Input Spreadsheets.

This procedure does not apply to rctensioned tendons.I iTr Lac. e PlUW AEeSP NM.M Enok I, Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 CMPMTMPage 12 Calculation S-95-0082 Note that the wire factor as shown in the various spreadsheets is a value representing the tabulated number of effective wires over a total of 163. The number of wires is usually 163 uniless cut, loose or considered ineffective. The number of effective wires as recorded from the original installation is documented on the tendon history shoets. The number of effective wires for each tendon has been updated, tabulated and presented in the Effective Wires Summary for each individual group within Attachment D. This tabulation was updated to include the results of all previous surveillances. It does not imply each of the tendons was specifically checked for the numbers of effective wires as presented in the table. It reprmsents only data from the original records and as made available from survcillance records and subsequent Inspections. -Note that the wire factor used is based on current information and is not based on the number of wires at the time of original installation, therefore the original Force calculated may not be the "original force" in the tendon back at that time. The effet of less eflfctve wires lowers the curve vrtically. This is insignificant at the current time as the curve of interest will be cos c for use at this time. Another method would have been to plot the original value using the wire factor then and then to show a step down on the curve should a lower wire factor occur at some point later on the graph.2.) Calculate Elastic Shortening Losses The elastic shortening losses are a function of th stressing scquence number for the individual tendon. In addition, the tendon wire factors an also considered and used. The base expression used to calculate these forces is the same as used in previous calmlations and is already built into the basic spreadsheet templates. All the equations for elastic shortening were confrmed as being the same as established in prior calculations. Based on the review of the procedure for calculating these losses, it is concluded that the existing templates are still appropriate and omect with the additional input of stressing sequence data and wire factors to be input for the current group of tendons for this surveillance. Refcrence 10 & Reference i I data and informatiom on elastic shortening was inchided in Attachment E to these calculations. See Attachmet C for original stressing sequences for all tendons and see the Data Input & Attachment D information for tendon fwir factors and source data.Elastic Shortening Losses for Dome Tendons Note there are two expressions used for elastic shortening for the dome tendons depending on the stress sequence numbers. For dome tendons in sequences I through 27, the Domelow template is used. For dome tendons in sequences 28 through 32, the Domehigh template Is to be used. This is because of the two separate expressions used for the calculation. Elastic Shortening Losses-For Dome Tendons in Sequences I through 27-N -27 Total Sequences n -Sequence of particular tendon.M~ f lPM utRES PJNucbwem~ K)*FFlrid~a DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 C RMAoM Page 13 Calculation 8-95.0082 Force Loss due to elastic shortening -Fa.A, N-n x 827 + 75] x reFaddr Elastic Shortening Losses.For Dome Tendons in Sequences 28 through 32-N ,5 S (Sequences 28 through 32)n -Sequence m-nber less 27 i.e. for sequence 28, n -I for sequence 29, n -2 for sequence 30. n , 3 for sequence 31, n -4 for sequence 32, n -5 Fie$=[Lj,-- x 47A4- 13.7] x c e~co The value for elastic shortening in kips declines as the stressing sequence increases. A review of the data for the dome group shows that values for the dome group go from 154.6 kips for sequence I tendons down to 75 kips for sequence 27 tendons, and furtie going down to -13.7 kips for the last sequence, sequence 32. Note that wire factor differences between individual tendons will cause the calculated result to vary slightly for two tendons within the same stressing sequence.Elastic Shortening Losses for Hoop Tendons-N -60 Total Sequences n -Sequence of particular tendon.Force Loss due to elastic shortening -Fles = nx 134.0] fieaco A review of the data for the hoop tendon group shows that the range ofvalues for the calculated elastic shortening go frion 127.3 kips for sequence 3 tendons down to 0 kips for the last tendon sequence, sequence 60.*91 RE1.U.wP~,i RESP~ Ie.acba, Emgmawuwrn oft Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 oo fn Page 14 Calculation S-95-0082 Elastic Shortening Losses for Vertical Tendons -N -3 Total Sequences n -Sequence of particular tendon.Force Lois due to elastic shortening -F =sn x 73.5] x fracr A review of the data for the vertical tendon group shows that the range of values calculated for elastic shortening go from 71.1 kips for sequence I tendons down to 4.7 kips for sequence 29 tendons. There are a total of 31 stressing sequences for the vertical tendons.3.) Calculate Wire Stress Relaxation Losses Wire strcss relaxation losses and the procedure for the determination of thes losses for the 4th and 5th)surveillances are addressed In the Reference 10 and I 1 calculations. The original wire relaxation curve, as provided by test data from the wire vendor forms the bases for wire relaxation loss values (See also FSAR Figure 5-23). It was determined that tie same procedures and figures as calculated in those prior calculations are still applicable for this surveillance. Applicable data fioro the reference sources was attached and included within this calculation as Attachmntd F.Note that there were adjustments made to the original stress relaxatio values from the vendor relaxation curve to allow for some conservatism and for temperature consideration of 100 degrees vs. 68 degrees F.Also, per the original design the wire factor or actual number of effective wires was considered as negligible for these losses and was not included. Note that values for stress relaxation nmgc between 40 and 50 kips for the surveillance period for all three tendon groups.4.) Calculate Creep Losses Concrete creep calculations in the Rcfcrence I I document are attached in Attachment G. The losses are based on the curve contained in the reference calculation. Creep values are different for each of the three groups of tendons. For the dome tendons in the coming surveillance period, creep values are the same and are about 152 to 158 kips, hoop values are between 79 and 83 kips, verticals are 36 to 38 kips.5.) Calculate Shrinkage Losses Attachnmnt H contains source infonnation for concrete shrinkage from Reference 10, pg. I I and Reference 11, cover page & Pages 13 & 14. The straight line shrinkage losses in micro inches per inch as calculated in the above two references are still applicable for this surveillance period. Tabulated values from these referenccs were input into the dome, hoop and vertical spreadsheets. There are no additional variables or considerations and the samc values are to be used for this calculation. From a review of the output information, the dome values are constant at 8 to 9 kips, hoop values are above 5 kips, vcrticals are also slightly above 5 kips.MET. LI. Pft RESP. MA~ce E-hpow.N Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION y ePower Crystal River Unit 3 COM10 .Page 15/ ft #~o Aro 1 t Calculation S-95-0082 6.) Total Losses Calculated force losses for elastic shortening, wire stress relaxatiom, creep and shrinkage are added for a total of all losses. Also, a percent of this total of all losses is calculated based on the original average force in the tendon.7.) Determin Predicted Forces for Base, 95% Base and 90% Base values The original force less the total of losses calculated yields the base predicted value for the subject period of surveillance inspection. The 95% and 90% values are then calculated based on the calculated predicted base value.8.) Normalizaion Factors Normalization factors arm calculated based on the expressions and the source article contained in Attachment I of this calculation. This fhctor usually does not change much over the forty year time span of the calculation. The base expression for the dome normalization factor value is presented as follows:) (A -B) x(-C)+(D-97.7) Where: A -Averag of all Domes group B -Original average tendon force C = Wire Stress laxation Percentag D -Elastic Shortening As an example, Dome tendon D 112 calculates as follows: NanmaozahlonFoator = (1639 -1676) x (I -0.0257) + (D -97.7) or-- = (-3 7) x or NF --138 which matches the spreadsheet calculation. Similar expressions arc shown for the hoop and vertical tendons in the information in Attachment I..) Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3.,oo.T4" Page 16 Calculation S-95-0082 x 9.) Plotting of Data Only the data from Column B, L, M, & N are tabulated on a separate area on the side of ft See Columns R, S, T & U; Rows 40 through 50. Only these values arc selected for plotting on the force curves.This is for ease of plotting and has no affl o the quality or accuracy of the plots. An example copy of this data immediately follows the first dome tendon.The plots of all dome curves with all the data points showed the force curve plot line as slightly crooked from a true linear plot. The large scale used showed some inflection points slightly off of linear. After investigation, the condition was avoided by omitting data points at year 10 and 15 after SIT for the final plotted figures. UTis was done only for presentation purposes and there is no affect on the accuracy of the plot or the base values calculated and presented on each cune.A column by column explanation ofthe losses calculation worksheet follows: L IA6 ft". eof PMI tESI' N. vif Engoakip Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3*oomfo.M IPage 17 7 WkMTWCAWMO NO- mo Calculation r-95-0082 INDIVIDUALTENDON LOSSES LOSSES CALCULATION WORKSHEET NOTES AND LEGEND Individual tendon losses arc calculated based on the procedure presented in the preceding section. The following notes explain the spreadsheet process, input and calculations performed for each of the columns presented. The shaded values on the losses worksheet are extracted from the data input worksheet. Column Racdilign A. Inspection Period after SIT Scale based on years after SIT which is shown on the bottom scale of each individual plot. Noie that this information is provided for easier readability with respect to SIT but is not the actual log scale used to construct the x axis of the plots.B. Years after Concrete Placement Scale of years after concrete placement as used for the x axis for plotting of the force curves and shown as the upper log scale at the top of each plot.. Note that one year after SIT for the dome tendon is 3.5 years on the log scale and for the hoop and vertical tendons is 5.4 years. See Section 6.1 of this calculation for further information. C. Elastic Shortening Calculated based on formulas presented in Section 6.22 and Attachment E information. D. Stress Relaxation Percent Calculated based on original wire loss curve percentages modified per the information presented in Attachrent F of this calculation. F. Stress Relaxation Forces Data input from the Reference I 1 calculation page 12. See Attachment F.F. Creep Stran Strain value (x 0.000 IData input from the Reference 11 calculation. See Attachment G of this calculation for data.G. Creep Strain Force Data input from the Reference 1 calculation. See Attachment G ofths calculation for data.H. Shrinkage Values Data input from the Reference II calculation based on the shrinkage curve. See Attachment 1H of this calculation for data.1. Shrinkage Force Data input from the Reference 1 calculation. See Attachment H of this calculation for data.lPeru% of Pam "Sr. toidw Eho~We I S Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 CORPORATlON Page 18 MEWJIIf t, EWW.CA7"ON NO. REV'SW Calculation S-95-0082 2 3. Total Force Loss Calculated valuc, Sum of columns C, E, G& 1.K Total Percent Loss Total loss in percentage, Column I / Average of original forces for shop & field ends calculated and shown above on the spreadsheet. L. Base The average original force for the tendon noted above on the sprcadsheet, less the total losses calculated in Column J. Note that total losses were not calculated on the row for the 17 year period, the 21 year 3 month period, as well as the 21 year period after SIT. Thcse rows represent the fifth, the originally planned sixth and thc current sixth surveillance periods and the values of Base were derived through linear interpolation of above and below data presented on the spreadsheet. The quality and accuracy is not affected by this procedure. M. 95% Base 0.95 x Column L for the same row.N. 90% Base 0.90 x Column L for the same row.0. Normalization Factor -Calculated based on formula presented in this calculation and in the information presented in Attachment .IqE L~ IRE ru NUW~ 7WCIW ~IIgWWWW~MWP &ft 40 Phwd RM3P-. MCWW Engm"ma Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 ,l[Tmm~l Jt usqPage 158 Calculation S-95,M82 ... ýColumn H & I Calculated force values in Kips which represent ram pressure @ 1500 psi. These forces represent a zero slac starting point for both shop and field ends of each tendon and provide a basis for the cat of any retensloning effort. The following expression is used to calculate these values: 0.7

• Tendon Ultimate Strength ' 1500 1 Predicted Lift-Off Pressure at 0.7 Tendon Ultimate Strenrgh.

See Reference 10 Calculation, page 34.Column J & K Calculated force values in Kips which represent forces at 80% ultimate based on the following expression: (Actual prssure @ 80% ultimate strength (Columns F or ()

• 0.7 Tendon Ultimate Strength)

/ Predicted pressure @ 70% Ultimate Strength.Column L & M Actual elongation data, repeated from columns B and C.In addition, the following calculations support the ultimate strength values provided on these spreadsheets: Tendon winr ultimate strength-Ca for wire -240 ksi) Tendon Ultimat Strength -F, -[fa for wire 0 Tendon wire area] =-240 ksi (0.05985

• 63 wires) "2341.3 Kips 0.7
• JRh -0.7 '2341.3 = 1638.9 Kips 0.8
• F,h 0.8 02341.3 -1873 Kips)

., LORIDA POWER CORPORATION -RIVER UNIT 3 MUi 1 REACIOR BUILDING SYSTEM IN ST 6th TENDON SURVEILIANCE CALCILATIONS SUPPOINDOG SP-182 O'RIMALS, SS'HO DATA FOR THE DOME TENDONS GROUP DOC 1T:S-95-0082 RMiSION 3 PAGE M9 0.7 Tendon Ultimate Strength -0.9 Tendon Uilmae Sfrenot .File DOME3.X.LW Aduzi d Ift-Of 30% UAad= Fow 51-182 So%1 Sruu DIa"_Dta Tada M-updm oin.) PIM j PfuMzu4d) Raw I (Kip0 Raw 2 (K~ps) Raw)3 ML.)-C () () 1-- -- W- m~l) UL (K Dili 3 S 6810 6810 7780 7780 361 361 1272 1872 3 3 0D112 4-3/4 5 6810 644 777 779 3so 359 1873 1367 4-3/4 S D113 dt-7/8 4-3/4 68033 Q140 7m7 7790 3a3 39 1,973 1867 4-7/5 4-314 D114 3-111 4-/8 S IM 6440 7770 790 362 3J9 187) 1867 5-118 4-3/3 1)15 A S 6840 6800 7790 1 7770 359 362 1867 8873 S M16 4-3/4 J-1/ 6760 60 77M "7 364 343 3672 1s" 43 D1o S , 6870 I 681o 7810 7780 38 361 is" 187 5 3 D131 4-1/2 4-7/1 6110 6740 7660 77M 366 365 1871 t87n 4-1/2 4-7/8 Din. 4-14 4-7/8 67M0 680 77m 375 3H4 362 187 1808 4-1/2 4-7/3 D21 610 68701 012 4-54 4-7/8 6770 6770 7730 70 363 363 1871 1 4531 4-7/1 83233 4-.V4 4-3V4 &M4 "W0 7790 7770 33 349 J867 1873 4-3/4 4-304 0214 4-3/4 4-718 6670 4740 700 7610 369 36 Is" 186 4414 47/8 0213 44 S-413 68CO 6870 788 7810 361 358 138 1863 44312 5-1/11 D216 S 5 68M "8 70 7M 361 1373 3373 3 3 D=0 3-38 $47/3 6530 65:0 7450 1430 376 1 373 1870 1871 3-5/8 r3-7/8 D303 44 1-3/4 6760 6770 77o 7730 364 363 17 1371 4-1/ 3-3/4.D304 44-/1 4 440 4600 o 790 77 359 362 1967 183 4-1/8 4 I1j 1 R3 dr,.4 D".4-311 1 4-3116 1 67"0 1 "M8 763 1 71620 1 M?36 I 1967 I IM 4-3/a I 4"316 D30 3 4-1/4 6770 6m3 718 7730 361 363 1873 3872 4-/ 4-1/4 V311 431/116 4-5/8 6800 6840 777 7790 362 359 1373 1867 4-11f16 4-5/5 770 6770 I -7/3-, 4840I 6880 77190 7770I 339.S 3.,,1 I 86 3873 47/5 4-7 3 the wwm ~dlkall mxnyletd t la dll mdcl uipe 11 m#t s0plusdla. .Ih4aI smallauom and bCdlwma A SmuO M.283J6-4M 3:54 PM kY.J FLORIDA POWER CORPORATION -CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 REACTOR BUILDING PRESTRESSING SYSTEM 6th TENDON SURVEILLANCE CALCULATION SUPPORIG SP-182 "OIUGINAL STRMSSING DATAO FOR THK nOOP TIEDONS GaOUP 0.7 Tendon UImate Surngth -O.S Tendon Ulbinne Strengdt -DOC 30:S-95-062 REVISION 3 PAGE 160 r'. Klps WeHOOPP.XLW Aclual P- eded litM-Off 8051 Noimre 1et SP-182 =Orligfd &r now$ Data Tendon 1louglom Ou. J4. presu rp) Press0r ( Raow I (Kips) IRw 2 (iops) Rowi (In.)4 -ao Fid -Rp il I -ap P- So I _ Fil Sbp Fed Mp bd M3 4-8 6871) 6810 7(i 7780 33 361 1263 i-5/ 4-5/8 42HI34s8 33/8 68410 6799 7810 7750 359 362 3873 1868 3 5-3/8 421119 534 5 67 680 7810 71 5 6 53 17 ./421129 5112 5-1/ 6870 6810 7810 77s0 35 361 186 1872 5-1/2 5-1/8 42H30 4-7/8 5-3/4 1 680 6790 7810 7750 358 363 1563 1871 4.71 $-3/4 421131 5-1/4 4-7J3 1 6170 6810 7310 7730 358 363 1363 1872 $-114 4-7/8 42H432 S ' 518 16 70 7111 770"tO o 87 -/ -/42H32 5-1/4 3 6870 6790 7810 77 353 362 1863 1373 3.1)4 4121433 slu/t 5-1/4 6370 6830 7810 7780 3538 361 3863 1373 5.3/8 5-1/4 42H34 5.1/ $Iva 675 6660 7680 7600 344 369 15w 38m 5-1/2 5-3/8 421135 5 5-1/4 130 6770 17760 7720 360 363 3362 3869 -421136 5.14 5-1/3 6170 6790 7610 7750 358 362 1863 3673 5-L1 3/m 421137 5-3116 4.7/3 6870 6130o 7310 7780 358 361 1363 13872 5-s/36 4.748 42H43 5-1/2 "/a 4870 6110 7810 7730 358 361 186 1373 "12 5-1/8 421144 5T111 5 6790 6140 750 7M 362 359 1871 3367 5.1/8 5 421143 3-7/16 3 670 "40 7810 7780 358 361 1863 1372 3-7/16 5 461120 114 5314 6640 6600 7700 7630 370 373 1901 1890 3-1/4 3-11 46I1)2 3-118 5-1/4 6720 6730 7700 7640 366 365 3873 1361 5-1/3 5-1/4-1 -- --o 46H=f 5.5/8 a-1/4 6720D 6730 7700 7640 366 365 5873 1861 5-5/3 5-1/4 511S2m S 5-1/8 677 69 7720 7750 363 362 1369 1368 1 3 5.18 331426 5-1/2 5-114 6760 4760 7750 7700 364 364 I179 1867 3-M/ 54/14 531H27 3-1/3 4-718 6740 6670 7630 7600 365 369 Is"8 1368 5.3/3 4-7/8 51H231 5.1/3 5 6760 6750 7750 77W0 364 364 1879 1870 "IN 5 51129 31In 4-3/4 6810 6750 7780 7700 361 364 872 1370 5-1/2 4-3/4 533111 5-3/4 3-118 6700 6760 7650 772 367 364 2871 13872 5-3/4 3-1/8 53112 "-34 4-M/ 6800 777 7760 7720 362 316 5170 3628 5-3/4 4-5/8 531143 5.3/8 4-3/ 6670 6710 7400 7770 369 3462 1368 3373 53-/8 4-1/8 33143A 4-714 1-5/4 1 6740 68030 77590 7770 359 362 586 587) 5-5/4 5-3t&5 3 214,173 5-3/ 3 -/ 6670 67130 7600 7660 369 36 3 1868 1 86747/ 5-3/34-/531447 4-3/4 5.3/ 1 6340 6800 779 7770 359 362 1367 1873 4-3J4 5.312 421121 5-34 4-314 6760 6700 7720 7650 364 367 1372 1873 5-1/3 4-3/4 62152 3-5/16 11 6800 6750 7773) 7700 362 364 3873 3870 "-5/6 S 62H423 53-Ail 5-3/4 680 6750 7770) 77W1 362 34 1373 387 5.3/S 3-1/4 62139 5-7/16 5-114 6800 6750 7770 7700 361 36 3873 1370 5-7/36 5-3/4 621,140 5-3/8 4-718 6100 6750 7770 770 362 364 3873 3870 5-3/3 4-7/8 4231143 5-34 5 6m 6750 70 77 362 364 3873 1870 5-3/4 5 62M142 3-3/9 51116 6800 4750 77 770 362 1 364 1373 170 5-318 5-3116 421,14) 5-3/8 4-7/8 6710 6670 7660 7600 366 369 1871 3868 5.3/3 4-7/8 6=44 5.12 4-7/8 6800 670 7770 7700 362 3" 1873 1870 5-1/2 1 -7/8 621145 53316 5.118 6760 6700 77M0 364 367 1884 5-3/16 311 621146 5-3/8 5-319 6800 7770 77W 362 364 1873 2570 5-1/3 5.318 2,1147 5"/s 4-3/2 6680 6640 7620 7550 368 370 1870 3864 1-. 1/2 I m I p,, 1K 193 IR.bo. -sgcuw sO w~dppt w dw3wd~ti&ayaiumd~~~ uh 28-Janr98 3:24 PM)

• .,jFLORIDA POWER CORPORATION

-CRYSTMAL RIVER UNIT 3 REACTOR BUILDING PRESTRESSING SYSrEM-.-6th TENDON SURVEILLANCE DtI)1S PEVI 2 PAGE3 161 CALCULATIONS SUPPORTING SP-182 "ORIGINAL STRESSING DATA* FOR THE VERTICAL TENDONS GROUP I ?,'0.7 Tendon Ultimate Strength P32KYps 0.8 Tcndon Ultimate Strength IL83"Kips File: VERTR2.NLW Actual Predicted Llft-Of 80% Uhimate For SP-182 "Original Streuing Data" Tendon Elongation (in.) Pressure (p) IPresme Row 1 (Kips Row 2 (Kips) Row 3 (In.)I ,5top F ikeT, IShop Fid Jip Field I ~- so Field ShpFedhp il 23V24 12-7/8 H 6870 NIA 71T WA 38 WA 1563 N/A 12-7118 IVA 12Vl 12-1/2 NIA 60 NIA 70 NA 362 N/A 1873 N/A 12-1/2 NIA 12V2 12-312 NIA 6800 N/A 777 NIA 362 NIA 13 NIA 12-1/2 N/A 23VI 12-1/4 N/A 6800 NA 7770 NA 362 NA 1873 N/A 12-114 N/A 23V2 13-1/9 NA 6870 NIA 1710 N/A 353 N/A 1863 N/A 13-1/3 N/A 23V3 13 N/A 67W N/A 7750 NfA 364 N/A 1179 N/A 13 WA 34V5 12-5/8 N/A 6800 N/A 7770 NWA 362 NIA 1873 N/A 12-S/8 N/A 34V6 13 NIA 6810 N/A 7730 H/A 361 N/A 1872 N/A 13 N/A 34V7 12-3/4 NA 6970 NIA 7510 N/A 358 NIA 1863 N/A 12-3/4 N/A 61V9 12-5116 N/A 6860 N/A 7840 N/A 355 N/A 1873 N/A 12-3/16 N/A 61VIO 12-3/4 N/A 6870 N/A 7810 N/A 358 N/A 1863 N/A 12-3/4 NIA 61 VII 12-5/8 NIA 6710 N/A 7660 N/A 366 NIA 1871 N/A 12-S/S N/A 61 V20 12-3/2 N/A 6870 N/A 7410 N/A 358 N/A 1863 N/A 12-1/2 NIA OIiV21 12-I/8 N/A 6810 N/A 7810 N/A 358 W/A 1863 N/A 12-1/8 NIA 61V22 12-7/S1 N/A 0870 N/A 7810 NIA 358 N/A 3863 N/A 12-7/8 N/A 6 --9?-U Columns A ltrough G ire data Input extracted from ite tendon history books (applicable shes contained In Attachment B).Columns H through M are calculated using she expressions noted below.Column Tendons withn the scope oflls survellabnce. Co.l&C Actual elongation dam taken horn tendon histry sheem for shop and field ends respectively. For the verical tendons, only fth shop cnd applies.Col.D&E Predicted Liftoff Pressures taken from tendon history sheets for shop and field ends respectively. Col.r&O sOS Uldmam pressures taken from tendon history sheem for shop and fld ends respectIvely. CoI.H&1 Columns H & I -Calculated force values in Kips for "Original Stressing Daa' Row I which epresent ram pressure @ 1500 psi.These forces represent a zero slack starting point for both shop mnd field ends of each tendon and provide a basis for retensloning effors.The following expression is used to calculate the values for Row I data: 0.7

• Tendon Uldtmate Strength 0 1500 I Predicted Lift off Plete at 0.7 esudon Ultimate Strength.le. for23V24:

1639* 130016870 -358 ColJ&K Calculated force values in Kips for Original S "ess Dam" Row 2 data which rprsem forces at 80% Ultimate based on the foUowing expression: I Actual pressure @ $0% Ultimate Stregth (Cols. F or G)

• 0.7 Ultimate Strength I Predicted pressure 4 70% UIL. from Cols. D or E.ie. for 23V24: 7810 " 1639167M -1863I Col.L& Actual eloatiin values repeated from Columns B & C for Row 3 of Original Stressing Data'.12-Sep.97 9:49 AM Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 COSUoRA Page 162 Calculation S-95-0082 2

7.0 CONCLUSION

S Tendon Forcedfne Curves have been gcnerated from the results of this calculation. Final force curves arc presented and attached in Section 6.0 of this calculation. Force curves for the three control tendons were also generated by this calculation and were used for comparison and verification of data and spread shects with the same curves generated previously for the same tendons. The comparison was completed and the data sheets and force curves were found to be the same as that previously gcncratcd. Other calculations supporting the "Original Stressing Data" and "Data Sheets" in SP-1 82 were completed I and arc presentcd in Section 6.6 of this calculation.I

8.0 REFERENCES

The following references are used in the preparation of this calculation:

1. G/C Lettcrto FPC, FCS-14594, Scope Document, Novcmbcr 24, 1995, for Preparation of Tendon Force Curves for the 6th Surveillance and site trip to CR3.2. G/C Letter to FPC, FCS-12439, August 13, 1991, Tendon Selection and Recommendations for the Fifth Surveillance.

3. Reg. Guide 1.35,Revision3

4. Reg. Guide 1.35.1, Revision 0 5. CR3 FSAR, Section 5.2 6. Technical Specification, Section 3.6.1.6 & Section4.6.1.6.

7. Design Input for the 5th Surveillance, DI-55220-152.0 SE, Revision 2.8. G/C Calculation of Force curves for the 5th Surveillance for SP-1 82, Revision 11.9. Design Input 5500-528-1, Revision to SP-182 Procedure for Tendons and Calculations for Force-Tune Curves for Surveillance 4, Revisions 0 and 1, Jan.87 and Sept.87.10. G/C Calculation 5500-528-1, Tendon Loss Calculations for Surveillance 4, Revisions 0 and 1, Jan.87 and Sept.87.11. G/C Calculation 04-4762-099, Tendon Loss Calculations and Appendices for CR3 Tendons, J.Fulton and G.T.DcMoss, 3/6/87 and 1980 calculations.

12. Dome Tendon History Sheets updated to the 5th surveillance.

13. Hoop Tendon History Sheets updated to the 5th surveillance.

RET. L. CO Pmut R!SP N!3P f EW~ bFeV u Florida DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Power Crystal River Unit 3 Page 163 bCCVMWb4T'CA1W0 NO.1 REWW4.... +/- _,~~Calculation ...S-95-0082 _o 14. Vertical Tendon 1-istory Sheets updated to the 5th surveillance.

15. Effective Wure Summary information, letter to FPC 16. Prcscon Vendor Dravwgs 17. SP-182,R zv 11.IS. Surveillance Report for the Fifth lnspection Period, VSL 19. Engineering Report for the Fifth Tendon Surveillance, GIC Letter to FPC, FCS 14401, 6120/94.)~Rft. UJ, dP~ 3 I~A R l 4,I)Florida Power fORAcm1mOK DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Crystal River Unit 3 Page Al VOGMIM ~~N1IC~fON dO Catcufetion S-95-0082 ATTACHMENT A DESIGN INPUT DATA FOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE K-,, U)m'. Vie d "am~ RES$: WOWsl &4amnsW a DESIGN ANALYSISICALCULATION Crystal River Unit 3) .- Page A2"non Na,.E08 I Calculation S-95-=02 Design Input Information for the 6th Surveillance The Gilbcn/Commonwealth Design Input document prepared for the 5th survillance is still applicable sirne it was prepartd at the ime FPC adresse new licensing and Tech Spec revisions concerning the CR3 Tendon Survillance Program. The document and some of W's attachments are attacbed herein. Also. correspondence frm the NRC resulting from It's review of CR3 tendon program issues is attached for reference.

The following Tech Spec sections were rviewed and are applicable to the tendon suroveillance program.Section 3.6.1.2. Amemdment 149 Section 5.6.2.7. Amendment 149 FSAR Sections applicable include.Sections 5.2 & 14.2.2 Figures 5-24 and 5-25 N WI: L4 at Pt" RESP. Modow Engims*' K~)* %U; 09 *095 -3:06Pt1 HLIC ADI VI -R. REO WILINI14 r. Nery M4. Beard, 4r.ltnior Vice President, Nucliar Operations (IAZI)Florida Power Corporation ATTN:. Kanaptr,, lclear Licensing 15750 V Power Line Street Crystal River, Florida 344Z8.4708

• ITED ITATIS ULATORY COM elf a. D.C. "NmOa@4 July 26, 199 POPi A3*4000ft IAK IMISSION sno OUBJECT:.8Jgutdqf~bLAt FIEN.*1~.L...

F2~ C AaED. IL

SUBJECT:

REVIEI OF IhE FIFTH TENION SURVEILLANCI REPOXT -CRYSTAL RIVER IUCLEAR GENERATIG PLANT UNIT 3 (TAC NO. K90126)

Dear Mr. Beard:

By letter dated August 12, 1993, as supplemented Deceaber 11, 1991 and May 15, 1991, you submitted for staff review a report 6n the results for the fifth (seventeenth year after structural Integrity test (SIT) ghysical surveillance of the C0stal liver 3 (CR3) Plant cont& inent bulldIng post-tensioning system. Vou performed the surveillance in accordance vith the requireunts of the orl Intl pl&At technical specitfcatlons (tS) for tendon surveillance and Regulatory auidb (R) 1.35 Revision 3. On the baist of your sureilllance end inspection of the various alwants of the post tlnlionift system, you .onclWded that the surveillance results demonstrate

1. • e integrity of the containment tendon system.We have completed our review of your submittal and we concur Vith your conclusloi with certain exceptions.

Your surveillance revealed great@leakage, corrosion of uichorheaid and bearing plates and ps.1ling aand crcking of concrete, all of which could be detrimental to the containmt terodon.System$ Please submit in action plan to rectify the umdesirable conditions as idetified and to iplement appropriate actions to rectify thes befor. the next.scheduled inspection. Our evaluation Is- enclosed.This completes our review under the TAC No. 020196 and, therefore, the TAC is c1osed, This requirement effects nine or fewr respondents, and subject to Office of asntoement and Budget review under therefore It is not P.A. H-is. Namager " ProJect Directorate 11-1 Division of Reactor Proests o Litt Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Y I Docket No. 50-302

Enclosure:

As stated cc w/enclosurm: See next page " 9 90 0310?PI¶ tLJc ArA¶It BLD Mr. Percy N. leard Florida Power Corporation cc:*Nr. Gerold A. Villiaas Corporate Counsel Florida Power Corporation P.O. tax 1444t St. Petersburg, ?lorida 33711 Mr. truce a. Vlickie Director Nluclear Pliat Optiraions, (MCI Florida Imoer Co'orhtIon Crsa iver Energy, Coolex 156 .Pooer Line Street Crystal River, Florida 34428-6708 Mr. Robert 5. loirsum Ulf Nuclear Technologies 3100 Rockville Pike,, Suits 1225 Rockville, Maryland 20852 National Aftiulstrator, Region It 101 Narietts, Stvt N. #I Suits IS04 Atlanta,, georia 30)1n yr. sll pas"atti Office of Radiation Control pop~% ~aof Health and 1317 Ulnawood .TallAhuses Florida 32319-07*@ Attorney General Deportment of Legal Affairs The Capitol'Tallahassee, florida, 31304 Anfhmot~ A Isr A4 Crystal liver Unit No,. 3 loefirating Plant Kr. Joe yers Director civilian of t roee preparedness separtasat oC Co nty Affairs t749 Centsemve Drive T.3litasssas florifa SS#tMlOG board of County Comissiouers titru~s County 110 orth opkaAvenue Mr. larry C. K~elley, Director Nuclear Operations Site Support a~ridIa Power Corporation Crys tal River Dueny Complex 170V Power Line Street crystal lisere florida, 34&2t.6Th6 Seair Resident losprctir U.S. Nuc ear latovy comissiowi $741 l l11hassee Road trystal River, florids 34415 Wr. 924r~y Bolatp Vice Prsident -ftlear Productlou 1S142)florida, Fewer torwratios crystal River te' EwCo~lex crystal River, florids 34425-708 K)(. The Crystal River 3 (C3) plant tehnical specifications (IS) r etme performing periodic Utndor surveillance consisting of sheathing filler material inspection, tendon l ift-off force measurement, anchorap compopent inspectiong, ndon wire Inspection and tensile tasting, grease leakage check, and tendon datenslonlng and rtenstioning and resealig for a number of selected tendons. for the fifth saurvallance In add tion to the three control tendoes (bat for each group), you ranaomly selected tw dome, to vertical and four boopteNc and sub s4Ctd them to lift-offs with one tendo" In each group Ling detensioned and You performed the surveillance In accordance with the requireenta of the original plant 7S for tendon surveillance and Regulatory Guide (Ii) 1.35 Revision S. On the basis of your surveillance and Inspection of the various elements of the post-tensioning systems, yoU cocluded that the surveillance results dombostrute the integrity of the Coatakimt tendon system.On the basis of our review of your submittal, ie concur with your conclusion with certain exteptitns. lour seurveillance revealed grease leakage, corrosion of anthorboads and bearing plates and spelling and cracking of cbncrete, all of which could be detrimental to the conta t neont tendon system. These conditions are evaluated below.1. Grease Voids From the data en grease removed from and groese replaced Into the tendon.hsathings theme appermd to be an untually high amount of freass voids or leSage, aho asount of grease added ramued from 9.5% to as high as 30.4%. In U letter Watd Septeuber o S11146, us ! dicated that the loss of grease appears to be nusually high in comparison to other plants with similar ireatress"d concrete containtente aid post-tensioning syates. Your response indicated that the losses elosely match rthosn of previous surveillantces & a t thorough investti Won had not detemined a toot cause for the abnrmality. Homver, frs the pYSiCal teast of individual tendon wires, the chmical tests of tM grease Itself. and the lift-off tests, the tendon systo is Miateaining its Intigrity. Furthevso I, there has been no gresse leakage observed. .t thesurf$ace of the On the basis of these observations, y"m reiterated that, Is spite of the abnormally hkgh amunt of grease voids, the structural Integrity of the tendons has not bean affected.We find your response 'to be reasonable. However, in view of the detrimental effects of potential greass leakage, you should sonitor more closely the greast injection. procedure in future survillancs tod ptrfom a thorough root cause investigation fot grease loss.2. Anchorage Assembly end Tendon Wire Your surveillance revealed high levels of corrosion on the anchor heads on five of the tendons (three an. the fitld and and two o4 both ends) uander surveillance. A pitting condition existed on localted areas of these anchor) heads, with. no signs of active oxtdaticn er bjldup of crust or rust. No free SaMoisture wIs within s$Wi. cap, ,f arY t tr,!a. Tbe bulk filler grease covered all tendon stressing anchor beids except for the top end of one CMCkA1". 3-93-CM P~ar~~ Ad vertical tendon. You believe that this condition has existed since original installation. You conclude4 that the observed conditions do not Indicate abrnioal degradation and will riot affect Ithe function Of the anchor heads.Your surveillance also discovered high levels of corrosion on bearing plates outside the seed area of the tendot end caps of six tendons (on ones end Of three ttndons and ont both ends of another three). The torrosioa ocuttred -exterior to the O-ring seal ad has not progressed to the point of breaching the Integrity oa te 0-rin and aeffecti o the tendon achorage c.mpoanets. RWpairs were made to the bearing plates to stop further degradation. The protection of the anchorage components Is assured and the function and integrity of the bearing plates Is maintained. However$ based on our review of tendon surveillance reports of a number of pliants we find that the types of corrosion of arnhorage components have not betn observed 14 other facilities and are unique to CR3. therefore; ue believe that it is necessary for you to expand the inspection to anchorage assemblies, especially the bearing plates, of other tendons not under surveillance to ensure timely repair of tay adverse conditions. -You Indicated that the cracking and spalliag of concrete are Insignificant. HoRwver, this requires repair before causing a further deteriorative of concrete and eaiforcement. It should also be lsoe aoted that your report provided only general stitiftats, regarding moisture content and the detrimental hemIical contents and does wO, giVldetails of water Content for each of the grease samples taken from the specific tendons and free water discovered at ed W nchorages and reuse cans. RG 1.35 requires such detailed Information and should be provided n future surveillance reports.One wire from each of thO detensioned dam, hoop and vertical tendons was tested. In addition, Ineffective wires and broken wires were removed for saple selection and testiol. All of the tested samples exceeded the required mtsibmu values for yield strength and elongation. A1 but on# exceeded the required tintm ultimate strength. -Tht caust for the broken wires was determined to b oft a nature rot dwt to stress corrosion. The buttonheads urae inspected for their physical condition and Were found to be effective and acceptable.

3. Tendon Lift.o-f Forces We have reviewed the lift-off forces of three dome, three vertical and five hoop tendons and also the Information on the correlation of force and elongation of the three detentioned and retensioned tendons. With the txcsptionf of vne hoop tendoo (46M29) which had only 68.1% of the base value (less thin the 90% of the base value as requirsd), the lift-off forces of other tendons were above the lower bound valuts established for these tandoge.Additional

%oop tendons were lifted off to net thu requirements in RG 1.35 under such a situation. The forces kvid the Corresponding elongations for thethree dotensioned sr.d ratonsion!'d tendons wars reviewed, and for each tUndon n 1r ; sto aer.tu y aoflsalmn b Lln hie v it ppoears to us ttl$t more I ft4.MM A?3-3 careful elongation muasuruments could have provided the required correct information and assurance of the quality of the overall tendon surveillance performed. The purpose of tendon surveillance is to dteromine If the ties dependent testross losses such as creep and shrinkage of concrete and eltxltion of tlndon wires are within the predicted range. The trend of such losses can be obtained by ferforming a regression analysis of the tendon lift-off forces for the tendons l0a group from all the surveillances conducted to date after the SIT. Before perfoming the analysis it is necssary to correct the teno seating force. This it because during.tendon and tWntionl it Is not possible to anchor all the tendons in a group at the sam force level and at the same time. The tendons are instaVlx sequentially. Anen the containment is subacted to the tendon force there will be elastic deformation. The'tendon tensioned first wit1 have lowver force at copletion of tensioning for the group than those tensioned list. lhertfore, the settitq force oust be corrected to reflect the tendon ho, r force for the elastic shortening taking into consideration the tendon tensioning sequence. On the theory that the containmmnt design is based on the Average tendon force of the group, an average of the corrected tendon anchor force* is determined. By.)v iding this average force by each individual corrected tendon force. a so-called nomalizing f I )or lQIFI obtained. Ihis NF is used to modify the lift-off force of the tenm don obtain the average farce Which should be compared with the rq'uired tendon force. The KF for each tendon Is a ca stant and will be used throughout all the survetllances. This appers to be the procedure used by a niger of utilities. Theoretically, ater mralliZation, all tendons in a group- should have the sam average value. Due to the mothod used In establishingUs KF and In obtainlng the lift-off forces the normalized tendon force It at best approxtuate but it should not vary appreciably from the average valve 1`r thk 9g;up.n *contrast to the KF approach, the RS 1.1 tiprsch to consider the prestress losi: is through the use of upper bound and loaer bound of tandoa forces as discussed In AG 1.15.1 and shoum in Fi.2 therein. The mverage Of the endon anchor forces which are the tendon setting forces corrected for 6t1itic losses can be used as the initial prestressing force. A graph similar to that Shown in Fig.t of PA 1.35.1 should be first constructed. The lift-off tom obftined for the group 0f Utndons represetted by the graph should be plotted on the graph without any correction. By plotting the lift-off forces from consecutive tendon surveillance of the group of tendons, It becomes possible to perfoam a trending analysis of the tendon forces.In response our request for additional information on normalization, you rovidod a formula for the OF, which Is actually a tendon force correction and ecludes not only prestress loss due to elastic deformaton, but also the relaxation of the tendon wire. In view of thes, the NF will be differet for each surveillance since It Involves the time factor. This only complicates the normalization procedure and does not improve the ascurity. If the hF involve- relaxstion of tendon wire, it appears the other time-dependent ir-sLr~s: ";s 6^0 to cret; W: should s'.io be includGd. It Is to .LJ e9 S5 ez:s'ft MC PZXI&K BLDG caggkAf A.4 FAS-4.be roted that correction Is mide to the setting force only for the elastic loss 0Ich Is not tim dependent and the normalization factor Ahich Is based on the corrected tondon anchor forcte As used to todify the lift-off force to the averige tendon force of the group. The NF procedure 11 based on the fact that after correction for elastic shortening loss each of the tendon forces and the avenrage of these tendoan forces for the group of tendons ire larSe To#red to the tie-dependent prestress losses. Therefore, the ratio, ei.the 0F, betwen each tendon force and the average tendon force for the group after correction for elastic shortening loss will not vary signifileily from that after correction for the tmes-dependsrtt lv The U F procedure it based on this proviso.in response to our concerns regardig 'bur normalization procedure a sd ne of the average of lift-off forces for the trot! analysis, you porf4rmrd analyses for each of the following cases for each group of tendons: II Using lift-off averages, normalized Us no all data points, normalized 3 Using lift-off averages, uocroalized 4 using all data points, umormmlied TMe ifonJtOn f1r each caste was plotted on I graph the sUm Us that shown In fig. I of is l.39.1 and a tgretssion analysis was performed for each caste In each group. From the results of these analseat we obiserved Isstlificant differences between the nomalized cases (1) a 4 (2) or the unnomllzeo cases (5) and (4), and apprecible differences between the nomalized Wd the VtnorMallze4 cases. However, based oan the trend of all groups of tendons, no roup of tendons womld be expected to go below its minimm required during the a.0rs plant life.1i spite of the favorable outcome of the results is sumtrlzed above, we believe that for future surveillances, the lift-off forces should be used for the trend analysis without averaging and normalization. Each tendon lift-Off force should be compared with the predetermined values of bats, 955 bste, and 501 base as required by R4 1.33.to tontlosion, we concur with your conclusion that the results of the surveillance demonstrated the Integrity of the containaent tendon system.Hoever, before the next Surveillance you should resolve the problem of missing greaise and should undorta'Me & program of inspection of the anchorage systeI which consists of the anchor heads and the bWing plates to assure tJath the pitting of the anchor heads and the-corrosion of the bearing plates uncovered in the surveillance are not widespread and would not Jeopardize the Integrity of the tendon anchorage systa. You should repair the 4nd spelling of concrete so that there will be no further deterioration of concrete or reifforcement. for future surveillances, the trend study.ýaf tha.tender. forces should be based on the lift-off forces witboavt avervint-and noY I Szllion. In retcnsionir! tendons, the elopgatifis-orroesponddi4 to-.e ro-rcez-snugJ.U ca&ul ly-rneasyced so ?1m2rM4,,7h,rII'eWI 01 twohs, Preserved. 'Mia cs'iiserve as iaftaditlonal choe-on the accuracy of the measurements performed. (84. ( _NJ (a4 Mr. Percy N. Beard, Jr.,r zi Senior Vice President, Nuclear Operations (SAA)Florida Paver Corporation ATTN: Manager, Nclear Licenslog 15760 V Power Line Street Crystal River, Florida 34428-6708 SVBIECT: CRYSTAL RIVER NUCLEAA GfIERAIMTG PLANT 1I01T 3 -POSTPONEMENT OF SURVEILLANCE OF E101T TENOIIS EXEMPT0E FROM THE FIFTH TEN1ON SURVEILLANCE (TAC NO. NON)055

Dear Hr. 8erd:

ly letter dated October 23, IS1, rou requested staff approval for postponing surveillance of eight tendons whic were exempted from the fifth tendon surveillance performed in 1"3 to the Sixth tendon sureillance. You bad ,) *committed to include the eight tendons In your sixth tewdon surveillance which was originally scheduled to be performd in It". You now propose to perform-the sixth tendon surveillance is 1998 Which Is less thin S ye ars from the fifth tendon surveillance which was performed is Noveber 193. Accordingly, you are requestin staff approval to postpone the surveillance of the eight tendons to the 1?S8 sixth tendon surveillance. $y letter dated Hay 159 1"5, you submitted results of your fifth tendon surveillance to demonstrate integrity of the containment Undon system.in a letter dated July 21, 1995, we forwarded our evaluation of the Fifth Tendon Surveillance Report, and concluded that the trend of all groups of tendons Is such that no group of tendons will go below Its minimam re"uired lift-off forctes before the 40-year plant life. Our July 28, 115 letter also identified certain undesirable conditions such as greast leakage, ancorasge bearing plate corrosion, cracking and spallinl of concrete. In response to these concerns, you committed to perform, during Refuel 10 (ti 111), a complete valkdowm of 549 tendons comprising the containment post-tensioning system. You also committed to perform visual Inspection to monitor external corrosion, grease leakage, and monitor for spelling of concrete and take appropriate corrective actions where warranted. On the basis of the fifth tendon surveillance results and your commitment to perform visual inspection during the Refuel 10, we find It accee table to perform the surveillance of the eight tendons durinolg-nosixinIthenon surveillance scheduled for Resfuel 11 In 118, which is within the 5 year surveillance frequency. In this matter we also would like to draw your attention to the following. In November 1176, you perforved the structural Integrity test (S1T) on the Crystal River 3 (CR3) prestressed concrete containmnt. Per Regulatory Guide t"? 27 ,.% 09a:4i t1C ailr* B= Cbkekd.n S-9s PAuerm A Mr. Percy N. Isard, Jr. -z (RG) 1.35. the tndon surveillances are to be performed 1, 3. and S years after SIT and every 5 years thereafter. You have comitted to follow the RtG 1.35 criteria. owver, a review 6f the history of your tendon surveillance Isdicates that your 3rd, 4th and Sth tendon surveillances have been performead on anl Inroxzittely 6-yetr interval, Whlle plnt technical specifications allow schedule flextblltty (a Z5% tnspctton Interval extension for conducting surveillanceus, such a schedule extenslon should imot be continued on a IO-term basis. Also, the general industry practice has been a plus or minus 6=nuthS scheule variants.This camletas our effort under TAC No. K94036 and the IAC Is close. if you have any questions, please call mu at (302) 4)5.1473.Sincerely, L. Raghauan, Project Manager Project Dlrectorate 11-i Division of Reactor Projects */Ut Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No.. 50-302 cc: See Het p1g9 !nghv.wring hautosd" NO.CA Al~em A K~)I monc r w.o. 100m"F"al River Unit 3 04-5520-12 DI-6520-152.O SE DESIGN INPUT RECORD SUBJECT Tendon Sumiiance Proam .Preparation of Misc. Calculatious and Survillance Podurc SP-182 CiSCiPuNE Structual 2241 PAE 0I REVISION 0 1 2 3 ITEM(S) REVISED ORIGINATOR M. mar_ _ _DATE a0--3 Oc q _____MROIEW DATE Sef APPROVALP "CE)_______ DATE 7069 ?6 1Z~b 4t v FtUTURE CONFVIRMATION REOUI RED? NO A 4 _____0ACROPILMED / DATE ITRUCTIONS: USE'NIK FOR IM S NOT APP CAMIL wT1y ITEMS KOUANG FUTURE CONPMTIOM BY CIRLE OR WTFY IEVISED ?OPKOIMAON BYVERCAL LNE IN A-HT MARON AND E' ION N"VL USE ADOITIA-SHEETS AS NECESSWA'. I vReim awi -4&v(i aZ 7-. xi~ Aft av,) AwED -4rrw/4/Ar-z ,f w A "-IV=7 A 7MI/2~T~r4.1 At M;J A-WISED *4rroted4K'ILr 7.*141 ' " OGebCommAnweaNh aft.=23 2*2I CdOfltm 5-954NO AUN~md A Engtin.v Instmion No.1 f Ai2 DESIGN INPUT RECORD toimn.ER*DI-52 Z0-M SE DESIGN INPUT FOR: CR3 P1-- 2 e STH TENDON SURVEILLANCE PERIOD REMlSiON: 2 DATM 17NOV93 I))[I 1. SCOPE OF THIS DIR; BASIC FUNCTIONS OF SYSTEM, STRUCTURE, OR COMPONENT: This DIR presents Design Input documentation related to the 5th Tendon Surveillance Program for Crystal River Unit 3. The scope of this DIR is for the preparation of Force/Time Curves for individual tendons, misc. calculations supporting surveillance activities, as well as for the revision of Surveillance Procedure, SP-182, tor the performance of site inspection activities. Revision I of this DIR wpill address the change in Inputs required as a result of the NRC not accepting the FPC proposed Tech Spec revision for the CR3 Tendon Surveillance Program to corply with the requirements of ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL FPCs discussions with the NRC concluded that the FPC program requirements should be based on Reg Guide 1.35, Revision 3. issued July 1990.Revision 2 of this DIR will address the change In Inputs required as a result of several meetings at the CR3 site. FPC's discussions with the NRC concluded that the new FPC Tech Spec Program may not be Implemented as soon as expected and that the current Tech Spec requirements are to be be addressed for this surveillance within the acceptance criteria of SP-182, Revision I).2. CLASSIFICATION; DESIGN CODE(S) AND STANDARDS: Nuclear Safety Related Classification Existing Tech Spec 3.6.1.6 and 4.6.1.6, Amendment 29 & 31.FSAR I.Re; Guide 135, Revision 3, July 1990.3. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS AND SOURCE: The Tendon Surveillance Program is controlled by Tech Spec Sections 3.6.1.6 and 4.6.1.6.However, FPC is currently going through a Tech Spec Improvement Program and will possibly be implementing this Program In mid N ovember in the middle of the surveillance. The new Tech Spec (See Attachment

1) will commit the Surveillance Program to Regulatory Guide 1.35, Revision 3 criteria.

FPC has discussed this with the NRC, and it was agreed that the new acceptance criteria is acceptable for use for this entire surveillance period. Therefore, the Reg. Guide criteria will be the basis for a revision to the existing Revision 10 of Surveillance Procedure SP-182. P-e- det he-ie.eme ,o( he.¢irren,.Ttnh-.Teeh-wR .-the-re~sio4o.SP42.(Se.-Attaehffe1;): It was determined in mid November that the existing current Tech Spec requirements will have to be addressed in SP-182, Revision I 1 until the actual implementation of the new Tech Spec program takesplace. Ws acceptance criteria is to be worked into SP-182 in addition to the Reg. Guide 135 acceptance criteria already built into the draft version.THI 'S A -fA T -CREbsCommonwRaNlOT ... -7HI I A E/MA£NTDE(G! RCOID O OTDEST/ROY Au, odms A 5"Inewln" Iftowwoon No. I PWA".DESIGN INPUT RECORO____ ____ ___ ____ ____ ___ ____ ___ DI-5S20-1S2.O SE"PAOE 3 .t 6 DESIGN INPUT FOR: CR3 5TH TENDON SURVEILLANCE PERIOD nEVWSSON: 2_DAM 17NOV93 4. DESIGN MARGINS OR SAFETY FACTORS: Design margins and safety factors are as included in the above Codes and Standards.

5. DESIGN CONDITIONS AND SOURCE: There are no design activities.

6. OPERATING CONDITIONS AND SOURCE: This surveillance will be performed during normal plant operation.

Tendons in the area between Buttresses I and 3, (00 to 1200) must be avoided due to the safety hazard of the main steam vents in that area. After numerous discussions with the site, it was determined that outside tendons with the following group/buttress numbers are to be considered inaccessible due to the steam venting problem- 13HXX, 42HXX, 51HXX. 53HXX, 62HXX. Inside tendons accessiblity must be individually confirmed through an FPC walkdown/concurrance. Radiological conditions, safety, and Interference with safety related systems and components may affect the selection of tendons inside the plant. Adequate consideration must be given to the potential effects on safety related systems from any surveillance activity.FPC has been Informed by G/C that the tendon selection process can be sucessfully completed for this surveillance using the limitations on the tendon population as noted above, however, the next several surveillances cannot be performed during plant operation because of these effects on the random tendon selection process.In addition, the exempted tendons from the selection process of this surveillance must be reviewed and considered for inclusion in the next surveillance. The exact position for the resolution of many exempted tendons will depend on the final accepted position taken by the NRC on the proposed Tech Spec position taken by FPC See the Attachment 3 letter, Attachment

1. This position will not affect remaining work for this surveillance but will need to be considered In future work.7. AMBIENT CONDITIONS AND SOURCE:*Ambient temperatures and pressures of the Reactor Building during normal operation of the plant are to be considered.

Elevated temperature effects on the tendons may need to be considered.

5. MATERIAL(S):

Most tendon materials are replacement of original materials. A summary of tendon related materials can be found in FSAR Section 52233 and In the CR3 Reactor Building Design Basis Document.SGbeWCommanwoalh-AAW~f frC~fM Cf1-QfGAI-SU 24teC K~)EMghw..Ingbstucion No. I PoVA14 DESIGN INPUT RECORD IDENTMIER DI-5520-M12. SE PAGMs 4 of 6 DESIGN INPUT FOR: CR3 STH TENDON SURVEILLANCE PERIOD 2 VATC: 17NOV93 9. OTHER REQUIREMENTS: The requirements of Reg Guide 135, Revision 3, are essentially the same as the requirements of ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL. In many places, the ASME Code provides a greater level of detail than the requirements of the Reg Guide. The ASME Code document will be utilized as a reference In the interpretation of some Reg. Guide requirements and criteria.FPC administrative procedures noted In References 16, 17, and 18 are to be followed for the revision of SP-182.The normal 40 year plant life is to be considered. As yet, no consideration for plant life extension has been requested from FPC. Future retensioning or other tendons work may need to consider any FPC plant lire extension plans or considerations.

10.

REFERENCES:

1. Design Input 5500-528-1, Revision to SP-182 Procedure for Tendons and Calculations for force-Time Curves for Surveillance 4, Revisions 0 and 1. Jan. 87 and Sept. 87.2. Calculation 5500-528.l, Tendon Loss Calculations for Surveillance 4, Revisions 0 and I Jan. 87 and Sept. 87.3. J. Fulton and G. T. DeMoss Calculation 04-4762-099, Tendon Loss Calculations and Appendices for CR3 Tendons, 3/6/87 and 1980 calculations.

4. Vertical Tendon History Sheets 5. Hoop Tendon History Sheets 6. Dome Tendon History Sheets 7. SP-182, Revision 10.8. SP-182. Revision 7. (Last surveillance proven revision)9. ASME B & PV Code, Section XI, Subsection IWL 10. Regulatory Guide 1.35, Revision 3, Issued July 1990.11. Regulatory Guide 1.35.1, Revision 0, Issued July 1990.12. G/C Engineering Study on the CR3 Tendon Surveillance Program, FCS-13670, Marcb 5, 1993.--- -b ,¶/CommonweaIth G .52N 2I2OC THI I &ERMW 1ESGNREOD ON17ESB.1I Afamam A Prag A13 EaginewhIn, ktuacln No0.I I DESIGN INPUT RECORD sMrl1ER D1-5S2OT4LD SE DESIGN INPUT FOR: CR3 5 SIM TENDON SURVEILLAINCE PERIOD REMMvS: 2 OAM" 17NOV93 13. G/C Study of ASME Section X), Subsection IWL for the CR3 tendon Surveillance Program, FCS- 389Z June 2, 1993.14. G/C Letter to FPC, FCS-12439, August 13, 1992, for Task I deliverables, Tendon Selection, General Report and recommendations for the 5th Surveillance.

15. Prescon Vendor Drawings -(GC Vendor Code 4680, Drawing Numbers 52-W26-000MA through 52-0026-0043P.

16. FPC Administrative Instructions, AI-402B, Procedure Writing (Except for EP/AP/VP), Revision 8, 10/25/91.17. FPC Administrative Instructions, AI-400-C, Permanent Procedures Revisions, Revision 10, 11/19/92.18. FPC Administrative Instructions, AI-701, Conduct of Inservice Inspection, Revision 9, 7/11/91.19. G/C Memo, 10/27/93, D.L. Keiser to M. Marcellus, Calculation references for minimum required prestress forces.20 Crystal River 3 Reactor Building Design Basis Document.21. G/C Engineering Report for the 3rd Surveillance, By T.H. Noble, May 19,1982.22. 3/C Engineering Report for the 4th Surveillance, By J. Herr, March 10,1988.23. G/C Scope Document Letter to FPC, FCS-13766, 4/2/93.ATTACHMENTS

1. Proposed and submitted FPC Tech Spec showing compliance to ASME Section XI, Subsection IWL, fax received from FPC on 9/24/93.2. W/C Letter to FPC, 10/8/93. FCS-14114.

M. Marcellus to J. Mascoll/B.Crane/B. Gutherman, Summary of G/C Design Input positions.

3. FPC Letter to the NRC, October 25, 1993, Withdrawal of Tech Spec Change 197 with attached revised Tech Spec, Changing from ASME IWL compliance to Reg Guide 1.35, Rev 3 compliance.

I often/Commmoawft3 GXA5=2 242qc 92MLQESTRQY PAup ASA EnIMMOWW9 Inovvcon me9.I)DESIGN INPUT RECORD DI-5520-2.0 SE eFCV. 5 of 6 " I DESIGN INPUT FOR: C" P -5TH TENDON SURVEILLANCE PERIOD RElIION 2 DAT.M 17NO93 0/C Letter to FPC, 10/12/93, FCS-14119, M. Marcellus to J. Mascoll/B.Crane/B. Gutherman, Revised summary of G/C Design Input positions.

5. G/C Letter to FPC, 10/12793, FCS-14158, M. Marcellus to J.Mascoli/B.Crane, with G/C comments on the proposed Tech Spec.)*1 oww" /c WAJ523 2 4 Z'o DO , I ,QM cdi tmS-4So AdMOW A 7Ta A17 b ~IP OilbartC@MMonMWkahVW"%WW"WM 0 O',pCwumuCame.

RNiul. PA IN07'ROY W. A)L!A tNtcjgr S4Incr Mr. .T. Bowles Nudear Pprqec Management Engineer Floda Power Corporation P. .BDc 1404211/l St. PCtasbur Fgfloid 33733 DW4O20-15L.0 SE ATTACHIMENT 4 October 12. 1993 FCS-14119 Work Order #04-5520-152 Contract NPM00.D. WA 152 4 , 7/ e t4JisC1- 7 nA*Ar Ma a 1&.Auention: L 0. MascoUl. Crane, B. Outirman"1 ya River 3 Tendon SurveMance Program Re FCS14114 Dated October 7,1993 Action By: FPC -October 13, 1993 Review and Comments, Unless N/A Deur Mr. Bowles: y isses and criteria for the tendon surveillance program were reviewed with you i. the above refenced letter. Since then. the direction for implementation of our work has 4ipiiflcady changed based upon the NRC rejection of the Tech Spec for the Tendon Surveiance Program.Based on discussions with Bnice Crane, we will now perform all related tendon surveillance tasks based oan the followin.t. Revision 11 of SP.182 will now be perfamed to comply with Reg. Guide -135 Revisdo 3, SnotASME Section Xl, Subsectim IWL An earlier review of the Reg. Guide veathe CR3 propmt concluded there were no sipfficant issues or disadvantages to commidi to teg. Guide, Revision 3. Howem, until our review and revision is complete, 0/C Is recommending that FPC consider that there are some exceptions likely to be taken against the full compiance to the Reg. Guide by FPC. G/C will notify FPC as tay *iftificant =eptlon Is identified.

2. The documentation of the above position, acceptance Items and specific interpretations of the Ref, Guide acceptance criteria has not been decided at this time. It may be within CP-145. However, an Interim place is to include these positions within SP-182. 0/C wl now include some of the general positions in the SP.182 document, but is uncertain whether all engfncermn/licensing positions and acceptance criteria can be properly placed In SP-181.SP-182 has basically addressed site inspection activities in the past and has not addressed engineerin/Licensing Issues to any level of detail.IiD An= Sa: lPA %Wt11 0A loamt 690OI .1 r¶snc

• far 2137M2.", bl1: )7in -$k*MVs'xI

-~u iWCc'mMF AWbuuSA20A* Mhd~ *~U T*avae;6 413142-I

• Pax: 5S4S17-1 PQ A 4sm-1 S2.0 SE ATTACHMENT 4 pOPi>5 OUCh.Psge 2 3. It Is assumed that the Tech Spec Improvement Propam wfl be in place and accepted by the NRC by November Ztn With the surveillance rapidly approacIng, a Tech Sp" ision prior to that date Is imprctical TMw accptance craie foe the interim period up to November 22 was discussed.

Bused on the established CIO Tendon Surveillwace Proram as dened by SP.182 and other documents, it h amumed that this entire tendon surydlance can be performed apinst the new criteria. Therefore, the acceptance crheria, within SP.182 which Is related to the eisting Tech Spec positions wil1 be removed and repla by the Reg. Quid. 135, Revision 3 positions. This will invove. new enclosures and calcladons within SP-182.Note that the above direction sIicantly changes most position noted i the reference letter.However. Items 4, S, 6 and 7 of that letter an umchanged for Q/C to Implement the requied scope of work.kpc concurrence wit the above positions by October 13Is required for o/C to complete ow tasks In support of the Any revsilon to the above will Impact out completion of S1.182.Additional rewofk enclosures and verilation result S ftom t dhaSe in criterIa, as cianmed above, has impacted the shedue. Assuming no further change in basic criteria, SP182 Revision it will be electrancafly transmitted to FPC on October 26 for review and comments. Tn addition, a copy of the document wM be Fedea Njpressed at the same tfMe.Should there be questions or dicusson on any of the above Items% please feet hee to eontact us at your conveniencL I R. T. owdes 3. Outherman R. Crne FM Records Management (CL Only)R. W. Adler (2)C. N. Rentc=hler D. D. Kraume Vestruy W yours PL .Marcehau-StrucnsnlTask Engieer R.W. Adte roetMAnage I!A ft Florida Power mpaUOt4 DESIGN ANALYSiSICALCULATION Crystal River Unit 3 Page BI 0OGUMWf "NnMA1T "a REVOC ICalculation S-95-0082I ATTACHMENT B TENDON HISTORY SHEETS FOR 6TH SURVEILLANCE K)4 em RKT Lb~ PhE ~P pA~w ~q,~wuq ou otm W# of ftme f4mp, mxQW fj q & ý ý e6-eeO , m S-,S4 S aFloida CRYSTAL RIVER MflIT NO. 3 re 02 Power REACTOR BUILDING PRE-:rRESSlNC SYSTEH= o"u .I'" .. .... TENDO !rI ISTORY T...TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUHBER I la CUQT LENGTH _ _ _ _ _SHIOP WASHER ID: PC1 I CR J ,iL @AhRZ:P J~ CR 1. CAIIQA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I /O/VD DATE _4,f/i/V 2. Date tendon received on-site __________ XR Number .7 c~/3, Date Installed in conduit __ Ins'tallation 4CR'_Wires removed 0 Wires teplaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded ./01 71, Buttonheading NCR's ___Sad wires _0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed ia " 7j Stressing 1CRts rDate restressed Restreseing NCR'se SiOP ?END FIELD END TOTAL..)Elongation (150O-psi to 80% ult.)-wPred./Act. tihfJ ii 4k $A- q4 9i4 Lift-Off Pressure -PtedictedfMtual (PO ED (2NC'F21_I 0tlA Shim Thickness/80X Ultimate Pressure :.Z.-J-227 _11 0 /Unseated/Broken Wires -Total effective wires after stressing " 6. Date Bulk-filled w --.,75 .. alk-Filling IICR#'s Time since instAllation Inlet Pressure JS'Q..p5Z.. Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop _ ._ _ Field .... .7. Data compiled by &.? ~Organi zation_______________ Date 1- _ _ _ __77 8. Additional Cotments;11K Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Pr" Power REACTOR BUILDIG PRE: fRESSIRC SYSTEH) TENDON fiSTORY TENDON4 IDENTIFICATION NIUMBER_____________ CUT____LENGTH___ SHOP WASHER ID: PC It tI , CR i FIELD WASIER, ID: PC __ I JI CR 10-7-_5 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I /0.'O DAZE W__,__,711

2. Date tendon received on-site* Jg,-1.=7 R4R Number "j__ _ _ _ _3. Date installed in conduit _ ___ '__ Ins'tallation NCR's Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded

_ .,_-_7_ -.- Buttonheading NCR's Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed Stressing NCR's -] 7 bate restressed _____ _ _ _ estressing NCR's SHlOP END FIELD E1ND TOTAL KY Ilongation (1500 psi to BOX uit.)-Pred./Act. 4n147-g A'94 ;A Lift-Off Pressure. -Predicted/Actual CS/1 (jc.L~s&%I MIA Shia Thickness/80% Ultimate Pressure -~I 7-77n .L ?.D N/A Unaeated/Broken Wires Total effective wires after stressing Ma ?6. Date Bulk-filled ,,,3-.Z5-7-- Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since installation LQ L..inlet Pressure jcý)Outlet Temp. 1 Date end caps refilled: Shop._-_ Field _ _._ _ _ , _, 7. Data compiled by .? Organization_______________ Date8._d__o a___ens_..._.___,___....

8. Additional Comments:___________________________________

Florida.KA..Power) *g¶4*180 SAW Cokmbm S.9160o Attm " hit 1.4 CRYSTAL RIVER 1111T NO. 3 REACrOR BUILDIhC PLTRESSINC SYSTEMHIsToRY TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUNDER__. __ 3_.._ aJT u:'r __SHOP WASHER ID: PC_ CR FIELD ID: PC,. CR ....1% CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I DATE 2. Date tendon received on-size )R4, Number 3. Date Installed In conlduit Installation NCR.'s Wires removed Wires replaced 'Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded Buttonheading NCR**__Bad vires Accept. Reheads .. Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed .__ __Stressing NC1os_Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. L I I Lift-Off Pressure -PredictedlActual / XIA Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure N.. t/A UnsestedlBroken Wires Total effective vires after stressing 6, Date Bulk-filled Bulk-Filling NCRs_Time since installation ..Inlet Pressure .... _Outlet Temp.Date end caps refi1led: Shop .Field 7. Data compiled by /2Organization ______________ Date__8. Additional Comments: a" ,e 4 4A 4 -"~f-p '1 (f~ Florida CRYSTAL RIVER uNItr NO. 3 AN -,--..- r REACTOR BUILDINGC RPs' R.SSIG SYSTSEMK ENDO IDENTIFICATION ER CUT1 1 .. LENGTH /, rP HOP .ASHEIR ID: PC CR FIELD WASHELR ID: PC /,2 CR 4706,.C CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I -/9p DATE:. Date tendon r-celved on-site d3 /' 74 .R Number o,7F il 3. Date Installed in conduit _ _ _-.2_-_74 installation Na's _.Wires removed W -ires replaced 0 Total Tneffective wires 0 i. Date buttonheaded 0/4- Buttonheading N4CR's Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0.Date stressed // Stressing CRs 1 I '7 Date restressed /42-//"7, Restresslni INCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL ongationa (1500. psi. to 80% talt.)-Pred./Act. I/~ y /K)Lif t-Oif Pressure -PredittedlActual .6,ZLZ ~ o 6 0 MI/A Shim Thickness/WI Ultimate Pressure 1 6 "/77.. A Unseated/Broken Wires j. _ Total effective vires after stressing 6. Date Bulk-filled ..%3-P?5:-15 Bulk-Filling NCR' a Time since Installation 6 eA

• Inlet Pressure 46i Outlet Temp. i Date end caps refilled:

Shop /"-2&07.o Field &-2,0-76 7. Data compiled by _______________Organization J1______9540_______ S. Add"itional Coents:t lt 1 1L~r L 'L ~g Florida CRYSTAL RIVER Utli NIO. 3 ar fl6 Power REACTOR BUILDINt G PRETRESSI?4G SYSTE)460P666900 TENtDON H1ISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION IUMEK /j2 C UT LNIcn_SHOP WASHER ID: PC ____ CR FIELD IASUER ID: PC CR 1. CAMIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC f .DATE 2, Date tendon recelved on-site NIR Number .3. Date installed In conduit Installation NCR's Wires removed __ Wires replaced _ Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded __ Buttonheading HCR's _Bad vires Accept. Reheads _ Total Ineffective wires __5. Date stressed Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80Z ult.)-Pred./Act. -...Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actusal N I, tI/A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure L .-IA, Unsested/Broken Wires Total effective wires after stressing_

6. Date Bulk-filled Bul____Sulk-Filling NCR's Time since installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled:

Shop Field___7. Data compiled by .. Orga;.zation Date _____ 1______________

8. Additional Coments: A042f I-.-- ..... 6.. -21 -20 1 l i _ i Florida CRYSTAL RIVER WIT NO. 3 Par 87 Power REACrOR BUILDING SYSTE M~SBFOAUS@MTENDON AISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION NIIMER .1. /5.CUT LENGTH /0.7 -7:k SHOP WASHER ID: PC____ CR : ) FIELD WASHIER ID: PC CR _ I 1. CAX/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I ,______,,.

DATE ________" 2. Date tendon received on-sits _________IH ubr 3:7 qgg4 3. Date Installed In conduit f-,?- / Ins'tallation NCR's Wtres removed 0 Wires replaced .0 Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded .. _ J'o7/ Buttonheading NCR's ._ _...Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed /f-//"7v Stressing NCR's ,_ _Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL (1500 pat to 80 ult.)-Pred./Act. ....,5 5.. I ) 1 10 Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual H/ -Shim Thickness/8OZ hiltimate Pressure Pjg :12~jL i qa J tI7 7- /A Unseated/Broken Wires , Total effective wires after stressing _6. Data Bulk-filled , 3 Z57 Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since 'installation Inlet Pressure _a4 Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop .Field 7. Data compiled by 49221 0. 'Organization..."_ Date _241. /7 7 8. Additional Coments:

• " Florida CRYSTAL RIVER I-II1T NO. 3 Afl .i Power MAcroR BUILDINC LTRESSIG SYS= Pr* /TE1DOM HISTORY TENCOM IDENTIFIC&TION NUMR p--11 __ CUT wNcT _SHOP WASHER ID: PC_ CR _ _ _ FIELD WASHER ID: PC CR .......1. GAI/Q& vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I 7W4" DATE _Z '___,_2. Date tendon received on-site _MR Number _3. Date installed In conduit InstallatIon NCR`_*Viares removed _ Wires replaced.

_ Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded ._Buttonheading HCRPs bad wires Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective vires 5. Date sttessed Stressing NCR'.s.Date restressed Restressln NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred.lAct. " __ _.Lift-Off Pressure -PredictedlActual .t HLA Shim Thickness/80X Ultimate Pressure " j _ lA Unseated/Broken Wires _-_ Total effective vires after stressing _ _.6. Date bulk-filled ... .. NCIVs .__Time since installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop _ Field .7. Data compiled by Organization Date_ __ _ __ _ __ _8.Additional Covuenta: £?,Ame,e e -Z90-rd"&r_.-AV -SA-ap "ft, K I--/ .06- -... ... Air X .. .iN -- -ml -- - Elorida CRYSTAL RIVER 1'tIT NO. 3 REACTOR BUILDItNG PIRrTRrSSING SYSTEMt TENDON 11L' fORy Aaa.o 3 ft". so*iDOtE IDENII~FICATION NUtIMER CUT 11LE N GTHn____________ SHOP VASHER ID: PCJ/",.. cR _ _ _.I VASHER-ID: PC C__ , 1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I DATE 2. Date tendon received on-site __R Number 3. Date Installed In conduit Installation NCR's Wires removed Wires replaced ._._Total lneffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded Buttonheeding NCR's bad wires .... _Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective wires 3. Date stressed " Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing, NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. / /Lift-Off Pressure -PredictedlActual ! N/A Shim Thickness/80 Ultimate Pressure / N/A Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective vires after stressing __6. Date Bulk-filled Bulk-Filling Time since Installation .I,_.._____._ Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps rdfilled: Shop Field ____7. Data compiled by 0 4. Organization FPC.QDate 1 -0 72 8. Additional'Comentse.PJ ftPLAA-rrWJ Wa. Jf* SHMrC I 907 716

• Florida CRYSTAL RIVER V'-IT NO. 3 A Power RECOR BUILDtIC PitlVFRESsl4G SYSTEH TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMER D/2) o CUT LENGTH //0 !- P SHIOP WASHIER ID: PC a CR FI 2 ELD WJASHER ID: PC J CR 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I /o/9D DATE _,//_ _ _ _2. Date tendon received on-situ __________

IR wNuber .079__________4_

3. Date InstllaIed in conduit _ "F.e- -2 Installation NCR's Wires removed. WIres replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded

_ " _0- 7S9 Buttonheading NCR'_s Bad wires .Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed /.2. 7V Stressing NCR's Date restressed _,__ .....___ Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL K.., Elongation .(1500 psi to 80% ult.)-.r.d./Act. .5",LfI j." " Lift-Off Pressure -Prediceed/Actual 6760 NIA Shim Thickness/SOZ Ultimate Pressure -7 *'/77ZDo 7 AL..TL26O tIA Unseated/Broken Wires ....- Q Total effective wires after stressing j(_6. Date Bulk-filled SE- " 7 Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since installation 16 t*Mx1I4 Inlet Pressure& p0o Outlet Temp. 64 Date end caps refilled: Shop _ _. Field 7. Data compiled by Jt. Organization __ _ __"__.Date d70 n/t .8. Addi~tional. Comments: I Florida CRYSTAL RIVER U 1 IIT NO. 3 A-,m, B IPower REACrOR BUILDIG SYSTEH he,,,, Co,0,I0l TCOII04 1"1STO_TENDON~ IDENTIFICATIONI NUMBER .1/0 CUT LENGTHI /92 SHOP WASHER ID: PC " L CR P11 FIELD 'WASHER ID: PC IC'R) ci -2. .2 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter nmbar-FFPC i /oZOL. DAlE v/,,h Y 2. Date tendon received on-site ,3 -ar HNumber .3 'O9-O 3. Date Installed in conduit M_2__"- ___- __ Installation .CR's Wires removed 0 Wires :eplaced 0 Total Ineffective Wires (4. Date buttonheaded 9 2 -7/ Buttonhe&dntn NC,4's Bad wires $ Accept. Reheads _ Total Ineffective Wires .5. Date stressed L/0-3 -74/ Stressing NCR's ____.Date restressed _Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Eo.ngation (1500 psi to 80Z ult.)-Pred./Act. 1 4 /;Lft-O~f f Pressure -Predicted /Actual N/A.~fi!Shim Ihickness/801 Ultimate Prcssure ý5 17p n N7 -IA Unseated/Broken Wires _0 Total effective wires after stressing .6. Date Bulk-filled 4 75Bulk-Filliog NCR's ______________ TIme since Installation 10901Aj11 Inlet Pressure j)55...p5z Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop ,_ _ _ld ... ..7. Data compiled by-2 e Organization _______________ Date____________ _8. Additional Coanents: _-.__A 4 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Power IEAC"OR BUILDING ESSING SYSTEH co-*o",l~oTENDON 6l1STORY.4DOI4 IDENTIFICATION UMB ..ER. CUT LENGTH //0- 9/,'SHOP WASHER ID: PC J) j CR -/002 FIELD WASHER ID: PC__ I '- CR _ ....1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC % DOE_ ./'/:i 2. Date tendon received on-site _%_3r= _21 WIR Number _ _ _ _ _ _3. Date Installed In conduit -n -L/.. Intallation tcN,.' .Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires._4. Data buttonheaded -..Bb-'7 JuttonheadinS NCR's 1/41 Bad wires / _ Accept. Reheads 9 Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed /, "67/ Stressing VCR's Date restressed ._.. Restressing NCR's _SHOP END FIELD FND TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80% uit.)-Pred./Act. ja44 -4 j 2JýZ/i9~5 Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual (:10'7/bf 6,7o 4 Of (aW Shin Thickness/BOX Ultimate Pressure /-14 A 20. NIA Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective -ires after stressing J.j_6. Date bulk-filled _________ ulk-F Illing NCR's ______________ TIme since Installation /g Inlet Pressure D5M~... -Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop Field__ *7, Data compiled by V 40<1&Organization J4,4_ _ __Date _____________

8. Additional Comments:)Rp 11 Florida Power rompsa~tso~m CRYSTAL RIVER WIlT NO. 3 REACTOR BUI1LDIIG PREaIRESSIHG SYSTEM"tHDO HISTORY ANkmm I 'hg* Sl$iNDON IDENTIFICAT ION NUMBER 9 , /3/ I -. CU w M SHOP WASHER ID: PC CA. FIELD WASHER 1D: PC CR ___1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC U __DATE._ _2. Date tendon received on-site _ _ _ _ _ IXR Number _3. Date installed In conduit .. ...... _Installation NCR's ,, Wires removed _Wi_ lires replaced Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded

__ _ ButtonheadibZg NCR9s Bad wires Accept. Reheads -_--Total Ineffective wires _.5. Date stressed __Stressing NCR's ___-_Date restressed Restresaing NRs_SHOP ENID FIELD END TOTAL Elongatlon (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. .-Lift-Off Pressure -PredLetedlActual I Shim Thtckness/80Z Ultimate Pressure I Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective wires aftel 6. Date Bulk-filled __Bulk-FIlling SCR' -Time since Installation Inlet Pressure Date end caps refilled: Shop __. __ Field 7. Data compiled by _ .Organization.____ Date~1~~~~-~1~~N IA r stressing_ Outlet Temp. _S. Additional Comentsi Vgwo dor/AZ/vjijA).>/Ao) I 00-1 Prt-e -22 4C 7~t 80 AC &p----~~~~.w~--------. --s -pý 1 ti Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT HO. 3 t..o...jot v er REACTOR BUILDI::C Pt:SIRLSSItN SY£H 1 il TEND03 IllS ORY x)vO z4 IDEUtIFICATON NUKIER 137 .V or LENG /3'- //' G'.oP WASHER ID: PC 4/ ,. CR 1 d FIELD WASHER ID: PC /1 CR CAlqA vendor inspection cover letter nuober-FPC I AP _ -0 2- __ _ DATE ___/__, _".Date tendon received on-site 2- 7 .R Number ....5. Date installed in conduit , J.7-,/' Installation NCR's Wires rcoved ires replaced 4c Total Ineffective wires C),. Date buttonheaded BitonheadLng NCR's __bad wires / Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires.Date stressed 1.,-3-7q Stressing NCR$'s.Date restressed ...... Restressing NCR's$SHOP END FIELD EIND TOTAL O'Nloniation (I.500.psi to 6D% ult.)-Pred./Act. JL,ýL -4 d.j/ 9.t-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 674a4700 69",/OO N/A sim. Thickness,/oZ Ultimatce Pressure Z, "i 7 7,o 777,6 N/A Unseated/hroken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing Date Bulk-filled B/""/". 1Bulk-Filling NCRP,'s Time since Installation /__,__,._:_ Inlet Pressure _,_o __; Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop Field'.Data compiled by e.________________ Organization_______________ Date ______ _ _ _ _ _ _I., Additional Co-entsz), l-ii , .* ,,;- F~or.ia CRYSTAL RIVER U31T 110. 3 cdl 35m k" *

• J ,.0.; EAcrox ?1' r*-*s rqsst::: sysTuL_,.0. T IFIM _ON 11tSW R,, rat .1D.b IDENTIFICATI0:

?UMIMER_____________________ 0 ..1 LE4_CD; /'Z 07, 3P WJASHER 10 C /:l. CR 7,2 FIELD WASHIER ID: PC _j ; ca CAI/QcA vendor Inspection cover letter n=.ber-?PC 1 /0ZA'_' DATE 4'//o74... Date tendon received on,-site £ 7R Number ______. ...Date instal.le! In ccn.uit Z,-J-374 installation tNCR's __Wires rc=oved 0 Wires ra;lzzed 0 Total Ineffective vires 0 Date butc..eeaded 1 1)" ' Buttonheading NCR's Bad vwres _ Accept. R.cthcas " Total Ineffective wires Date stressed _ / 3_ -7_ Stressin; NCR's &tRi &M/," Date.restressal _ PRastress~ns tiMR's ....SHOP WD 'FIELD END TOTAL (1500 psi to 60% ult.)-?:ed./Act. ','$.- -964',/oe ""+li.-Of ?'ressure -Predicted/Actual / ' T " 4 1 e&,( Ii/A Shia Thickness/8o%. Ultimate Pressure 174' Y/",7&'-O NIA* ,+Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective wires after stressing ..L * '.Date Bulk-filled -2(-7g" Bulk-FlllLnZ NCR's Ilme since Installation Inlet Pressure UT Outlet Temp.Date end caps ref illed: Sho ..... .Fleld ____*Data compiled _______________Organization _ 0__o_______________

• ~~Date A__________________

.. Additional Coiencs: 1V&,tA4gD0 Florida Power gompea ar 06 CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO' 3 REACTOR BUILDU4C PRLS,-'ESSINC SYSTE1 TENDON IISTOmy C ., 4S.C-u Aftfaebmm 8 PAf oS TENDON IDENTIFICATION ?IL D Z/1. r CU LENGTH-_SHOP WASHER ID: PC_____ CR ______FIELD WASHER ID: PC______ CR ______1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I __ _ DATrE 2. Date tendon received on-site 4P. Number _3. Date Installed In conduit Installation NCR's Wires removed ,,, Wires replaced Total Ineffective wires ,,_.....A. Date butionheaded ___ButtonheadLng NCR's Bad vires _ Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective vires 5. Date stressed Stressing HCR'sa Date restressed Restressiug NCR'.s SHOP END FIELD END 7OTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80X ult,)-?red./Act. LIft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual, Shim Thickness/8OX Ultimate Pressure inseated/Broken Wires -_ ._ .. Total effective vlres 6. Date Bulk-filled _ Bulk-Filling NCR' s Time since Installation Inlet Pressure Date end cups refilled: Shop .. _-. __ Field 7. Data compiled by .22 -Organization-I-N/A.after stressing Outlet Temp.Date 8. Additional Coments: ArPoi7? ' " A -'"" P A, -f ( II J-I 74I I F'.or~da CRYSTAL RIVER WIlT NO. 3A 3:6 6~.# o -bo IEACMOI I:LuLD::G Pr!:rFTSr~Sl:: SYSTEM ? $1=4OO IDENTIFICATXM1 NMMER__________ _ aLIr LEIGTH /'V-OP 1WAS11ZR, 10% PCJJ CR ' FIELD WIASHIER ID.- PC_ CR GAl IQA% vendor Inspecticri co*.-r lette~r number-FPC /O ___________ DATE '/ 'Date tendon receivad on-sita %3___89-7___- P.IM. Number 53 1? a Date Installed in conduit __________Installation NCtfs i'Ii Wires rczoved 0 wires replaced ý0 Total Ineffective wires 0C: Date buttonheaded 10 ?l Buttonheadin; tC.M's _____________ Bad wicrer Accept. Rehe.ids 0Total Ineffective wires /Date stressed _____ ______Stressin; ".CR's_____________ Date. restressed ______________Restressing 1:CRs________________ SHOP L'D FIELD ENID TOTAL ag'oation (1500 psi to 60Z ult.)-rred.IAct. d~go 179019/*~~ 1i~c-*O&ff Pressure -Predicced/Actual 477o, WA~4 Shia Thickness/BOX8 Ultim~ate Pressure N/i,#~~HA* *Unseaed/Sroke Wires 0Total effective wires after stressing,..2.J..

• Date Bulk-filled S..7 Bulk-Filling liC91 ________________

TIme since installation In~~d~ ltet Pressure

• Outlet Temp._____

Date end caps refilled: Shop _________ Ireld___________________

• Data CDrCPIled by 2?~Organization

______________ 'Date ___9& ______177___

• Additional Co~ents.: 0 9 I aJ -] _

C C I eISTaL l UilN Tl i. 3 PItIIlUUI 6111MM w uamm 3UIVUI.U5 ImsC 1fIDU One D212 , Itl Of ¢ociff1Oi. .?tICIIIaI Irnpectle. Avg. 8in Lat"- Total Avg. M "10 il00- TOMal stor alas.lPalr sad lotre Io*e ,sim 91060"w forev Ifinos TlIeiee.o atios tllotiwe ow *atlvCu of!se Wae AY2 fbia) _(V It) WIvo (RIP) (%IN#) (Q (it) e l a 2 4 1 35e- 1 WOlM 6 I31wi 4 _Si & .9L _iLL 1213174 I 6 1612 6/ 471r 162 L l.. .. K & .9L X &, i ll lm I M X &"

• Ji U L " 3 Ir.. _..92 6 31._" VIA V 128S 1336 6 31_. VIA VIA 162 piA VIA ulA Uva TIA VIA 162 1. Lift-off goly 82 53.YY&W£.n3 p2um ai's .d.L MIA AM A& Alm MIA 144R1- OFxc COA"S /e-----*. ---------~n -------------------a -----5ff WI Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIr NO. 3 t. B,, TEHNON HISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION4 NUMBER 71M)in CUT LENGTHI ____________

SHOP WASHER ID:- PC L2 .CR ~ ,FIELD VASHER ID: PC L..... CR 2......I. CAI/QA vendor Lnspection cover letter wumber-FC I /0Z,_r'" DATE _/Ao/ " 2. Date tendon received on-site _ 3_A______9_____ RHR Number __________________

3. Date installed in conduit _-__ -_. _ Installation NCR. __s Wires removed W Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded ICo -Ito -7(1 Duttonheading NCR's _____________

Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 'Total Ineffective wires 0 S. Date stressed i11894 Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing NR'1s SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL.oongation (1500 pos to 80% ult.)-Pred.Act. _ _ _, _7__v 7_7;E Lift-Off Pressure -PredictedlActual /g'.o 1 0,VOrSt N/A Shia Thickness/80% Vitimate Pressure &6 'iLlO 7 ~ s 7770 NI/A Unseated/Broken Wires. 0 Total effective wires after stressing , 6. Date Bulk-fllled_ 25_ bulk-FtllIng NCR's Time since Installation C~n Inlet Pressure L p. Outlet Temp.Date end caps ref'iled: Shop Field 7. Data compiled by : Organization J"_44, Date V 7-8. Additional Comments: t cL K;- -& Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT .N. 3 Athm..M Power AcrOR BUILDING CAIlTRESSING ST rw TNDON IDErNrIFCATION NUMBER CU 2./ ..t LENGTH _ __SHOP WASHER ID: PC_ __ CR __-__ FIELD WASHER ID: PC CR _1. GAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC D D&TE 2. Data tendon received on-site , _ HR Number _ _ .._.3. Date Installed In conduit InsZtallation NCR's Wires removed .... Waires replaced 'Total ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded _uttonheading, NCR's Bad vires _ Accept. Reheads -_ __ ,,, Total Ineffective vires ___.5. Date stressed Stressing NCR's Date restressed _Restressing NCR'sEND FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. __._________7 Lift-Off Pressure -PredLcted/Actusl N. liA Shim Thitkness/801 Ultimate Pressure M hIA Unseatedl/roken Wires __ ____ Total effective wires after stressing'6. Date Bulk-filled ........ Bulk-Filling MCRs'Time since Installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date and caps refilled: Shop .... Field 7. Data compiled by 00 17?Z4S , Organization --- .. .Date 8. Additional CoumentB: _&p /ý,!rw ,0a A- ,0 K" " 06 V W.Tq nAl. 7 1 I11o ,. CRYSTAL RIVER U4ur ZO. 3 ..*:, m ...,jzT ICrO BUIL[DI::G ?r.sgr.::S: SYSu , aO*PO-I#O TEUWO. HItST')RY MMI IDEN71FICATI03 NUMER CU~i/ ~T LEC~TI /7'/ M'WASHER ID: PC_ Ci FIELD -ASIIL ID: -C g GAIIQ,/ vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC i /62 -5. DATE _______y_. Date t endon received on-sfte ,.,,A9__-_ RXMR RKuber R2_'__.6._. Date Installed in cendui.t t -e 1-4 Installtion NWCR'S Wires rceoved / Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires Date bucto.headed L1 -IJ. L4. Buttorhedin.; Bad wires

• Accec. ulloads 0 Total Ineffective vwres /Date stressed Ia "(o" 4 Stressin; r.Cu _s Date restrcss4

_ lestressir. ICnK's SHOP FIELD END TOTAL pgation (1500 psi to 609 uit.)-Pred.fjAcc. -a '/ 4-0g 4Af 41,~j t 9 51fg%LIft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual q L70 A _904 5 LA 292A1; 6~q f tiN/A Shim Thickness/80% Ultiiate Pressure ..2..Q d NIA Unseated/Broken Wires tToial effective vires after stressing _* Date Bulk-filled ! .Bulk-Tilling NCR's .....Date end caps refilled: Shop

• Yield ....*Data compiled by Organization

______________ Date L77 Adiina c -ens II-& A " -t tl;-m IIIft WAAL&- Flrida Power 90164459 CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 RZACTOR NUILDINC PRMC:RESSING SYSW(TENDON HISTORY Crkatre SB2 Fa. 322 TENDON IDENTIFICATIO14 NUMBER jA 2/ ' n LM SHOP WASHER ID: PC CR FIELD WASHIER ID: PC CR _.I. CAL/QA vendor inspection cover letter nuber-FPC I .... DATE__2. Date tendon received on-site M Numbet 3. Date installed in conduit Installation HCR's Wires removed Vicres replaced T Total Ineffective vires 4. Date buttonheaded _Ba_-__ _ Dttonheading NCR's Bad wires _ _ .Accept. Reheade. 'Total Ineffective wires 5. Date stressed ..... Stressming MCR1 Date restressed ...._ Restresolng NCR's SHOP MNl FIELD END TOTAL Q,) Elongation (1500 psi to 60? ult.)-Pred./:t. .I Lit t-Off. Pressure -Predicted/Actual " , TAIA Shim Thickness/802 Ultimate Pressure _ N/A Unseated/Broken Wires __Total effective vires after stressing __-_____" 6. Date Bulk-filled ___-_._ Bulk-FIrllug NC'_s live since installation Inlet Pressure Outlet Temp.Date end caps reftlledt Shop Field 7. Data compiled by DOrganizatio Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _a.-Additioanal. Comments: _&VP&,e efe, #.,r X o.1 _,' ,;/ .,/. . Florida CRYSIAL RIVER UNI r HO. 3 &-"4M Power REACOR UILDING PRESTRESSING SYSTVI par W)q*4 tooTto TENDONI HISIOWY~Tirot iDEincinCt;O muK314 at 21 CU LENGWTH___________ SHOP WASUER ID PC 2 .I c& T ELDWASHER ID: PC __ _ C&_1. vendor inspection cover letter ~umber-MPC 0 ,_ DMTE 2. Date tendon received on-Bite M__ R $umber 3. Date Installed In conduit Installation NCR's Wires removed ____ _ Wires replaced __Total Ineffective wires ,,,_ , 4. Date buttonheaded __ )uttooheading NCR's Bad wires .... _Accept. Reheads _ Total Ineffective wires _5. Datae stressed S__ Stressing NCR's Date restreused ._ Restressing 14CI's __SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80 ult.)-=red./Act. I z-Lift-Off Pressure -Predictedl/ctual L NIA Shim Thitckness/80O Ultimate Pressure I .NIA UnseatedlBroken Wires Total effective vwies after stressing ._._6. Date Bulk-filled _ulk-Filling NCR's "_Time since installation Inlet Presshlae _ Outlet Temp. _Date end caps ief illed: Shop Field _ _-_ _-_____.. _7. Data compiled by --Or~: 7 ~ gan ization FPC-Date _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _8. Additional Couwents: Th' ?,tCA41?A 1TOI) Pie -5.4 r~9JL4JCC 907 716 Florida CRYS7AL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Aa"b*1 Power REACrOa BUILDINGC PRS, 'ESSlIG SYSTEM t TENDON IILSTORY W4DON IDENTIFICATION NdUMBER CU-? 5OT LENGTH .~3~d SHOP WlASHER ID: PC ,/Z ca FI_ lEL WASHER ID: PC /X/ cR 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-YPC I 0 2Y!r DATE _.'./ , 2. Date tendon received. on-site. _%3ng- 74 Pat Number ________________

3. Date Installed in conduit (-JO)'7 4 Installation NCR's Wires removed 0 .ires replaced 0 Total Ineffective Vires 0 4. Date buttonheaded

/1-/ Q42 d Buttonheadins NCR's _Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires *5, Date stressed _ /.. -'74 Stressing NCR'* ,_, Daie restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP et D FIELD END TOTAL-ongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred./Act. .~Li.. ~ i: LIft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 1,0? v 7 OI KAA Shim 7hickness/8O% 'Ultimate Pressure I-4A 1 ,7110 "/A Unsested/Broken Vitres- 0 Total effective waires after stressing 6. Date Bulk-filled ...L- 7-Bulk-Filling NCR's .___._ __ _.Time since installation Z~ L.Inlet Pressure f~!Outlet Temp. ZI Date end caps refifleds Shop ...____ Field 7, Data compiled by ...... ..... .. Organization Date -7/"Z _7Z 8. Additional Coments: C.I Florida rW Power 4g-A6AIxv Caksu~hg 5-95.006 AftwMhmm U irl"3 25 CRYSTAL RIVER UIIT MD. 3 REACTOR BUILINGu PREJREssINC SYSTEMj TENDON HISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER -42 wlr CUT_ _ __CT_SHOP WJASIIER ID: PC CR __ _ FIELD WASHER ID: PC__. CR _t. CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I ,_DATE 2. Date tendon received on-site _IR Humber 3. Date Installed In conkuit _ Installatiou _NCs Wires removed ... _ .Wires replaced ...... Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded _Buttonheading VCR's Bad wires Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective vires 5. Date stressed Stressing NCR'__Date restressed ,.,_ __ _ Restressing _CR __SHOP END YIELD END \ TOTAL-9 Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./4ct. , Liftt-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual L .1 Shim Thicknesu/80Z Ultimate Pressure " /Unseaced/Broken wires Total effective wires after stressing 6. Date Bulk-tilled Bulk-Filling, ?CR's Time since installation I____nlet .Pressuve Outlet Tean Date end caps refilled: Shop "___Feld ...ld 7., Data compiled by Organization Date2 14/A N/A p.k m Be Additional Comments: .. --//.... ..;o- (z/,r/,e)" t&, qsusFlodda Power At .,eMm3 faor S2 CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 REACr0l PRESTRSSIN SYSTEM TENONt HISTORY!DIDM IDNTIFICA-TION UMBER C)2SanT LUNGnI___________ SHOP WASHER ID: PC__ _ CR _ FIELD WASHER IDs PCCR __1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FlC I DATE_ I ____.....2. Date tendon received on-site MR Number 3. Date Installed In coudduit _Installation NCR's Wires removed " _ Wires replaced ._ Total Ineffective 4. Date buttonheaded Buttocheading NCR's_Bad wires __Accept. Reheada .... Total Ideffective wires __5. Date stressed Stressing NCIL8s Date restresee, ___ Restressifu NCR's _SHOP END FlELD END TOTAL Rlonlation (1500 psi to 80R ult.)-Pred./Ac. .._._ _ I_Lif t-Of f -eesre P redicted /Actual (nftP) 13~ Ica., f3%.,/47:S, N/A L0(.I..Pf FWI ft&J ..'.Shin Thickness/802 Ultimate Pressure 1 N/A Unseared/Broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing /63 6. Date Bulk-filled Bulk-.illing NCR*'_Time since Installation ..... Inlet Pressure Ou tlet Tamip. ...Date end caps refilled: Shop Field 7" 7. Data compiled by _ __ _ _ _ Orgauization ______ ___ __Date I 7 76 8. Additional Commentes -1~p! S Eor _FT2S I SLLIVMLtU.CE --9 00~ --- -.Q" 12y=2)Loc -o ? r- _,oclE _(SAIP-SAMEA L4 W--I&5V , _) 'JO "gACleW4 Ar -C LC L';i nAq .me ~-.-..d.S, S.cIrAl. UV1I UUIT go* 3-s cm MU lOINftn MtSU11M U l-fITfd UVOCIDl InUUYW1tUAKl U*~:Oe3 .,,nWeo Vao. ns_ *.mmr ClOMO .110&-50 whim slow A Ialk lool- eg h70 ator alds.eiod "A foargo Vo. ao el*4 gI. t iv v Pt. ltom elaba atlea Iffaetie low eature Olf_..__m- (kie) (hIp. IIf) (in) vimne (iHa. (tlC ) (li)s (10) _ Vto. _ 8l, 4.. Coug 1 Or"Is.al -3 A m -VIA- WA VIA IIIZ& .L. 1670 1667 6 jI SAN S ~ II It*~ 165 AI UIt L&3 6~a7 VA112 r VIA* 1616 2644 6 3140 VIA 113 164 13623 4 2140 VIA 163 92 46-... A- 7d VIA VIA 7w VIA 1. Ltfc-off oall.10.2221 ..L.. .Ih) ..~14 '4~..2LJII. 16 VI WI 362~ VIA. 113 2 If J$L~ 4E/#2j.! NIA ellA 03J4 ad.32. Oo~toti' me QCaws 4DDItv awa £Cvofwb 4123. 72--- a --a ----- -- --- -- ---fit Si.1*1-Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNir NO. 3*Power REACrOR BUILDINlC ,,EsI.ssIN SYST Pa A us comoa.,g@. TENIDON4 HISTORY rENDON IDENTrIFICATION~ NUMBER ) icu'r LENG~TH /5 -6;HOP WASHER, D: I C /c L CR /2. FIELD WASHER ID: PC/ C /Z3' _1. GAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I / ]OZ.VS DATE 9',/7V 2. Date tendon received on-site ._!/-_- ___ N,!.,umber 3 3. Date installed In conduit R ._-/0-94 Insta5atioNCI's Wires removed 0 , Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wiires 0 (.. Date buttonheaded /0 94 Buttonheading NICR's Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed I4 91 Stressing, NCR'" Date restressed ,_, Restresnsin NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL K} tongation (1500 poi to 80% ult.)-Pred./'Act. 4 0 Lift-off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 7 14 r 4/1 (v 7iomr _N/AA Shim Thickness/80% Ultimate Pressure V 1 ,2/77a (2~ 1 710 N/I&Unseated/Broken Uires 00 Total effective wires after stressing /6.3 6. Date Bulk-filled B- 2A-?S 1ulk-Filling NC'.__s'ZIme since installation Inlet Pressure5 -4 j Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop .Field 7. Data comupiled by 2?4 -Organization_______________ Date / /7 8. Additional Coments_ 1"4 .4: "'.* '-*.) CRYSTAL RIVER U!6IT NO. 3 ckm* .I xA a O .C U IL D. ::G P rr ..s s I ., S Y S T D I A£e i u MIO IDENrIFzCxrxo::

IER CU3 3 T LENGTH 4F Y3 o* IAS)TER to : Pc- JAI.o: CR ..... FIELD WASHER ID: PC' C" CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter n=bar-FPC 5 /03 57 DATE. YI3 7_?17-*l Date tendon rice.ved 0--ste L-t-"* 1'R Number _"I _ _, Date In::a!1ed

!-. Ccnduit pp.1 Installation NCICLS ___________.ires re-oved 0 .Ures replaced Total Ineffective vires C>Date buttc..n.eaded - rCR's Bad w'ires " j Accept. Veheads 0 Total Ineffective vi;:s /Date stressed_ 1 1-t4-t:-14 StressinS NCR's _ lt"1I DaCe rest.__ssd_......... Restressing NCR's .....SHOP rFD FIELD Ee*D TOTAL vSnsin(1500 Psi to 60% ult.)-Pzed./Act. 3I'1'" 3W,3 ( ..2.L.i....I-Ift O~f Pressure -PrediLcted/Actual -4F 4O~1~b ~~~Shim Thickness/SO% Ulti-ace Zressure I N /A Unseated/Bro'ken W'ires L.... Total effective vires after stressing .L. -" Date Bulk-Mled B,-,l-7S' B.ik-ril.ing

cs ' /9/80 Time since installation q~.. fiA Inlet P Temp.Date end caps refilleds Shop _ Field __Data cocpiled by .?Organiza tion _____________

Date 1,7__ __.Additional Co-ents: ___"_ _A ... t m mil Florida Pnswor CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Awmb~m..At*Wu4Ms4

• W?" .F*
• v.*njNaNu, r1VL,.i
• j8rui f*~ (F o oN*,l. TENDON HISTORYD~rrCAZO w.onz~r~ --n_______TENDON IDENTIFICATION( mW)4ER_____________

__g2!_70_CUT______ SHOP ID: PC CR _ FIELD WASHER ID: PC _ CR __1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter nusber-FPC I DAT_2. Date tendon received on-site _MR Nu__ _ Nmber 3. Date Installed in conduit Installation lICIVs Wires removed Wires replaced Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded _ ____._Buttonheadin$ NCR's Bad wires __Accept. Reheads _Total Ineffective vife$5. Date stressed ____ Stressing MC'SO _a__Date restressed __ __ _ _estressing NCRs._SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL V.NL Elongation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred.Act. _ I) Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual I j IA Shia Thickness/=0O Ultimate Pressure / .. _ /A .Unseated/Broken Wires _ Total effective wires after stressing 6. Date Bulk-filled 'Bauk-Filling NCR's Time since Installation Inlet Pressure .... Outlet Temp. _ _., Date end caps refilled: Shop Feld 7. Data compiled by Organization Date /77 8. Additional Comments: .A..e .--4r--200rje i 4.Z /,Po "Nez "Zsg/-~ T .~.. -Qf7 716 Florda CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT -NO. 3 Aftaek.mi Power REACrOR BUILDI,,C PiPZS'tSSIH. SYSTME 83, co,,.om,,o.o,, _ TENDON IHISTO.RY*NDON IDENTIFICATIOH NUMBER C LENGTH1 HOP WASHER ID: PC.JL CR FI .FELD 'WASHER ID,: PC L1 c 9&,.CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I /03."7 DAT ..,,/36/17Y.Date tendon received on-site VMR Number __ ___.. ..1. Date Installed in conduit __________Installation NCR's___________ Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 Date buttonheaded /041-i74L Buttonheadink NCR's _____________ bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wiries ._____* Date stressed __.._-_74t_. stressing mcR'.' 1 6__4_ _.'_.Date restressed ... .RestressIng NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL P.longation (1500 psi to 801 ult.)-Pred.IAct. ________ 4____3AE_)Lif t*Of f Pressure -Predicted /Actual,4 j ~ s f~~~~ts NIA Shia 'Thickness/801 Ultimate Pressure 4~~V .L L Z~N/A Unseated/iroken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing _SDate bulk-filled 2 " 1 Sulk-Fillins NCR's Time since Installation i Inlet Pressure 3 Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop __ Field'. Data compiled by Organization Date __ _ __ _ __ _ _ __ _ __ _ _I. Additional Counents: ACbehm. S4 Florida CRYSAL RIVER U11IT N4. 3 Page, .3 4s Power RuAcoOR 1uuma rEithsrissuc SYSTEMPAS TENDON HISTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION N _ .3ER CUT LENGTH SHOP VASUER ID: PC____ CR YIELD WASHER ID: PC ____ CR _I. GAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I __DATE_ pAT"._ -2. Date tendon received on-site _ _ _R Number .3. Date installed in conduit Installation 14CR's _Vires removed W._ires replaced Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttotnheaded ButtonheadLnS NCR's Bad wires Accept. Reheada _ Total Iaeffective wires 5. Date stressed ____ __Strepsing NC ___Date restressed lestresslog tCK's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to.80Z ult.)-Fred./Act. _ _ .......... L. .Lift-Off Pressure -?redicted/Actual I .IA Shim Thickness/802 Ultimate Pressure MIA. , Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective vires after stressing __"" 6. Date Bulk-filled Sulk-Filling NCR's Time since installation Znlet Pressure ....__ Outlet Temp. ,_..... __Data end caps refilled: Shop _Fiel_ ed ,__ _7. Data compiled by,..5 Organization _ _ _... ....tteAdt-..C,,t/,,.._ .8. Aditinal ommnts:je~eef -.----- -r-. -. -V

• 0,.-, '- ,.o da CRYSTAL RIVER uNIT 0. 3 WR "* ',-,-, RrAC1OR CUILDIN: P E SYSTEM 5 , c* ,, TEI:MO0 11iSTOIY IDEN'T ZoFICAT.Z MI','X:.ME.R

7) 3oS" 05 LL-4GXU /CUT PYI IP WASHER ID:.I'C /O CR Y~ IELD WASHIER ID: PC _1 CR CAI/Q,% vend.r inspection cover letter r.-'ber-FPC I /03," .DATE.__,'

_____,_Date tenden received on-site I.tR Number Date ltrstalled + ccnduit __ 67_4_ " installation m CRs / _ .Wires reeoved Wi/ lres relaced 0 Total Ineffective vires /Date buct._hteded /0 -!/--4j _ uttonheadinZ NCR*&Bad vires _ Accept. Reheads / Total Ineffective wires 7-Date stressed _ / , ..-Td tressing NCR's., Date restressed ._ Restressing NCR's-* SHOP ED FIELD E[;D TOTAL 0 1 4_Ol, ti,, (1500 psi to 60% ult.)-Pred.lAct. '/r JL*.. .I'L6ft-Off Pressure -Predicted/ActualIIA Shi Thickness/8OX Ultimate Pressure -6/2 2~ NIA*Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing /60 Date -ulk-filed _ nulk-Fillin NCRs__Time since Installation &/ ^4 Inlet Pressure JM S Outlet Tem~p.Date end caps refilled: Shop Yield Data compiled by, e._;27'ý4 Organization ______________ Date __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _ __ __ _Additional C-e.ents:

• "

Florida Power C94008A4 so.CRYSTAL RIVER UNIiT NO. 3 REACTOR BUILDINGC PRE3iRESSING SYSTEM TENDON HISTORY CPkwapse S45O0m hreS34 TENDON IDENTIFICATION IINMER .2 3ro" anI LENGTHI_________ SHO W4ASHIER ID: PC CR FIELD .ASr1ER ID: PC___ _ CR.1. GAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I .... ___TE:_,_,_,_.

2. Date tendon received on-site __R Number _3. Date installed in conduit Installation NCR's Wires removed Wires replaced __ Total Ineffective vires 4. Date buttonheaded

• Buttonheadlng NCR's Bad wires Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective wires S. Date stressed .__,_ _ .Scressins NCR's __Date restressed Restressing KCR's .SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi' to 802 ult.)-Pred.IAct.

--j Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual [ , N/A Shim ThicknessllOZ Ultimate Pressure HIA Unseated/Broken Wires Toial effective wires after stressing 6. Date Bulk-fAled Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since installation .... Inlet Pressure , Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop Field 7. Data compiled by , Organization _Date 9AA_8. Addtional Counents: _9d'*i__.t'o,... 5* / o 4e-M 2fr'-_ ~~~~~~j Of L. ,, n .._ --ss nu,, n1 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 C~kvb~md S.9S4M Power .... REACOR BULDING cPsR'E.STESIc SYST.E 3-- --worT..EtDO T HISTORY tgosm-ol IDENTIFICATION NUMBER__________ aLIT LEN=1 *HPWSER ID: C D CI FIELD WASHER I.D: PG (*.. GAI/QA veidor Inspection cover letter number-FPC 1 /403 SP DATE- 4V/e7,:. Date tendon'received on-site ___________ M Nkumber X 2762 I. Date Installed in conduit g -7& Installation NCR's' Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires (o. Date buttonheaded _16- 9-74 Buttonheading NCR's Bad wires

• Accept. )Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires /;a Date stressed /1-.7-94 Stressing NCR's .....Date restressed

_Restressins NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL e oneation (1500 psi to 60% ult.)-Pred./AOt. p.).f ffPressure -Predicted/Actual 6_______ NIA Shim Thicknessl8O% Ultimate Pressure 27 N/A_______ Unseated/Broken Wires ,... Total ef fectivi wires af ter stressing.

• .Date Bulk-filled

~ '11 .Bulk-Filling NCRes______________ Time since Intlain/ Inlet Pressure ~t ~ Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop __ , _ Field 1. Data compiled by 2 g ý Organization _______-___ Date e ______3. Additional Comnents: 4 .&4V / Floddc CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Afte,,.I Power REACrOR BUILDINC PRLSTRESSINC SYSTEi TENDON IUSTORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER C U/0

• ct LENGTH SHOP WASHER ID: PC ____ .._. CR. .FIELD WASHER ID: PC. CR_ _I. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I DAiZ 2o Date tendon received on-site 1__R Number " 3. Date installed in conduit Installation NCL's Wires removed Wires replaced Total Ineffective vires .......4. Date buttoaheaded

_ _Buttonheadlng NCR.'s Bad vires Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective vires 5. Date stressed ..... Stressing NCR, __a Date restressed _Restressing NCRts _SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL rN Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred,/Act. I I) Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual f .! N/A Shia Thickness/80 Ultimate Pressure N I/A Unseated/Broken Wires Total effective vires after stressing 6. Date Bulk-filled bulk-Filling NCR's Time since Installation Inlet Pressure ,, Outlet 7emp.Date end caps refilled: Shop __ Field, 7. Data compiled by _Organization _ _ _ _ _Date #//77 8. Additional Comments:- 5-0 I CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Aft*&-w o 9 Power REACTOR BUILDING ILSTItESSING SYSTEM top w,.P *~C6POA?@STENDON 11ISlORY r IDENTIFICATION NUMER CU 3 / T LENGTH /43J t.5;ao~ WASHE RiD: Pc__C. ~J._e 1 Qf FIELD WASHER ID: PC ,j.. CAI/QA vehdor inspection cover letter number-FPC I /0357 DAT E. _,_____,_, 1. Date tendon received on-site _ -0 1-_2 aR Number 3R7O 3. Date Installed In conduit -Installation NCR's .Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 1. Date buttonheaded _O.--')' .Buttonheading NCR's Bad wires 0 Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires;. Date stressed 11-11-7IL Stressing NCR'sI Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL"R~longation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred. /Act. Lj V{14/LNfi. !i7q 13 cj;*1~',.Aft-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual (420*1"OJ.O C140.:2 N/ A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure Ifts 17770 -7290 N/A Unseated/Broken Wires <3 Total effective wires after stressing 16:3 Date Bulk-filled B_,,_._7- ___ Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since .installation, /OAr-&X;Zt Inlet PresisureM P= Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilled: Shop ,-Field I. Data compiled by 2 .2 Organization"_ _'_....Date I. Additional Coments: nnn i inmlm- w. .-u _ i _ _ _- ~~Ca..ba ,gf~ol Florida CRYSTAL RIVER OUT N40. 3 Pm t a Power REAcroR BUnLDiNc ras SYSTEH v*ev e. TENDON I1STORY TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER .U 3//

• N GT SHOP WASHER iD: PC_ CR .F_ FIELD WASHER ID* PCC _CI 1. CAIIQA vendor inspection cover letter n~uber-F.C I .D. ,ATE ___ ___2. Date tendon received on-site _._ PMR HNuber 3. Date installed in con'duit Installation NCR!9s ____ __Wires removed 'Wires replaced Total lneffective wires _A. Date buttonheaded

......... buttoahe adlg NCRs s Bad wires _ Accept. Reheads Total Ineffective wires S. Date stressed S___ .._ _ tressing NCR' .Date restressed _Iestressing NC'. __SHOP END FIELD END 7OTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. , * .../) Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual N,, ., ../IA Shim Thickness/SOX Ultimate Pressure I .L ."/A Unseated/Broken Wires .....__ Totsl effective wires after stressing "_6. Date Sulk-filled __lk-Filliog NCRK's ,, Time since installation _ Inlet Pressure ...._ Outlet Temp.Date end caps refilleds Shop Field .. ..__ ___ ___ .7. Data compiled by _Organization ___ _ _ _ _ _8. Additional Commentsz

.'e.~e~~d I-, i~ J~ Z..OF K2.)-, -S.- --V -- =,, ..., -_-I.- -.v gv Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNmir NO. 3 Cd, B5S-O Power REAcot BUILDINGC 1Fo.s.-ssINC SYSTE-f,14o..,,o.

49OV611414011 TENDON )JISTORY pa M rj MIDENTIFICATION UMBER :7D3 ap CU LENGTH vs -;0H? WASHER IZ: PC... J. CR o, Q FIELD ID: PC. Ci _ 55 t. GAI/qh vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I /03S7 DATF. _______Z. Date tendon received on-ste / -I/;.21 MR N be ,3N m7br 3. Date installed In conduit , Installation NCR!'s Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded _ _ -_-_ Buttonheading NCR's Bad wires ( Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires <Date stressed Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL OZlongation (1500 psi to 80Z ult'.)-Pred./Att. /I*7 ,a cJ Ift-Of f Pressure -Predicted Ac tual N/A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure 62 1"7 770 NIA, Unaeated/Broken Wires C) Total effective vires after stressing J _ "* Date Bulk-filled 3.3 75" Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since Installation J0tAw4MtJo -Inlet Pressure ~ ~~ Outlet Temp. Azh :6~Date end caps refilled: Shop __Field _ _ _.. ...' Data compiled by Z .__... Organization ___Date "//_7_ _.Additional Comments: K-7----' N-. -. -flaw i Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Mb,,.3 Power REMO BUILDING PRESTRESSING SYSTYXtos TENDON IIISTORY jZp0 DI rcEoTIFrC1CA 0i .YHUBEkR 4,,'2 'f 7 On .SHOP ID: C /Z/ / cR 4 74I' tIELD WASHER ID': PC-/ ..cp 1. vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC D 916/ DAZ t _ ILA7Y 2. Date tendon received on-site /2 -2,P. 73 MR KHuber #?"I 3. Date Installed in conduit /-_27- ?V, -Installation _Vimes removed 0 Vires replaced 0 Total Ineffective.vires 0 4. Date buttonheaded buttonheading HCRs Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads _ Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed o,- -7r Stressing NCR'S Date restressed Restressing MICR's S10? END TIELD END MOTAL~'!P% Elongation (1500 psi to 80Z ult.)-Pra~d./Act. s/~' IS-Fr 71r ,4V X4 / /0 beý/Lif t-Of f Pressure -Predict ed/Actual 6P70 17066 7/ 4 ,iPoo N/A Shim Thickness/80% Ultimate Pressure 7 /?P/0 G, /7780 H/A Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing /63 6. bate Bulk-filled _7-2 -_ Bulk-Filling .-CRO_Time since Installation inlet Pressure 7 Outlet Temp.o/Date end caps refilled: Shop Field _7. Data compiled b CZ Organization Date 7 8. Additional Coments:_907 716 ig.re 11 Florkia CRYSTAL RIVER UIlT NO. 3 IN4 Power IIcOR sUILDItII rim"LSSu SYSTK 11W 541 oo,,.TENIDON IISTORY-OMER 4,' CUT -V 4,e SHOP WASHER ID: PC 2/ CR 6 -FIELD WASIIER 1D: PC /212- 1 CR 9 1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I ____DATE 2/'2. Date tendon received on-site /2-20" 73 MiRNumber Z 3. Date Installed in conduit /-,2Z-0/ installation NCRIO Wires removed to Wires replaced _ Total Ineffective wires 4. Date buttonheaded l*/I'71 Buttonheadlft NCR's .... _ _.Bad wires 0 Accept. Rebeads -Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed 1 4" 7_r Stressing OCR's .Date restressed ____Restressing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL I" Eloangtion, (1300 psi to 8102 ult.)-Prcd./Act. s-SJr, -Lift-Off Pressure -PredictedlActual IWO/'0 1777 N/A7S'0 __ _A Shim Thlicknessu/0Z Ultimate Pressure 4 I 7MOP L/s; -HIA UnseatedlBroken Wires " Total effective wires after stressing /63 6. Dote bulk-f illed -7 26 "74X Bulk-Filling NCR'. _ _......___ Time since Installation .4& ,2!4 .Inlet Pressure 47 Outlet Temp. /'Date eod caps refilled: Shop Field 7. Data compiled by -Organization .__.___-Date __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _S. Additional Coments: 907 716 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Auhm.u3 INN Power REACTOR BUILDING PP,'.TRESSM SYSTE- I'eesa..o..,o Tr~_ND04 11srTOY.TINDON IDENTIFICATION NUMKBER CUT LENGT 1$'- 7t'l_________ SHOP WASHER ID: PC /Z .CR 5.6T FIELD WASHER IDI Pc /. / CK /V/1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC .9?2/ DAiTF. 212 2. Date tendon received on-site 2 P- 7. M lR Number 3Y r 3. Date installed In condutt /- 22. -.Installation NCR'S Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 4= Total Ineffective vires 4. Date buttonheaded £-/I--7.y buttonheadIng NCR's Bad wires " Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires 0 5. Date stressed Stressing NC_1_a Date restressed _ _._ ., Restressing NCR's_SilOP END FIELD END TOTAL f"'ElouGation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)-Pred. /Act. Jr*,i fr ' /~4//~4) Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual Np/.OADO 6 14/Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure , 17T10 6_ _ _ ro N/A Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective s after stressing /le-3 6. Date Bulk-filled 2- 4 -7 , Bulk-Filling NCRs Time since Installation g Inlet Pressure _ --Outlet Temp. -Date end c8ap refilled: Shop __ Field 7. Data compiled W-4?4 e_ Organization _____________ Date I"_/_ _ _ _8. Additional Comments: W.n7 716 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UN1T NO. 3 Power U^E OR SUILDWCX ?RES-ruSSIoc SysXV Mw), *o*.o-.,,eo TENDON H!ISTORY -..WPON IDENTIFICATION VUHSER VZ 1131 W? wncm CS 7 Ay SHOP WASIHER ID: PC fl.I CR 3T FIELD W1ASKER ID: PC /-Z. C, _IZZ 3 I. GAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter nunber-FPC I , ??A8< MTE a/ fr/1;.3 2. Date tendon received on-site /P -Y -7 3 W1K Nbe 3.3 6 3. Date Instafled in conduit f/ Z '7v InstallatIon NCR_'s Wires removed W0 ires replaced P Toital Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheeded G -2.-7,1/. .Buttonheeding NCR's __, _ .Bad uires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective vtres 5. Date stressed 2- ./ -7J' Stressing NCR's Date restressed __ _ ,___ Restressing MCR's SKOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elonsation (1500 psi to 80% ult.)!-Prtd./Act. t4' -4' _V,r; -, ; i'iI~re i) tt-Off Pressure -Pzedicted/Actuaal U70 P70000 cP/o ,I,4A Shia Ihicknesslfi0l Ultimate Pressure e/.,V jIC. J~ 7 75 P4A Unseated/lroken Wires 0 'Total effective wires after stressing /63 6. Date Bulk-filled 7--l-.-74 Bulk-Filling NC'__Time since installation 6 r4wiA Inlet Pressure 2% Outlet Temp. /780 Date end caps refilled: Shop Field 7. Data compiled by Organization _,__ _, Date e-/ ..77 8. Additional Coments:.)907 716 Florda CRYSTAL RIVER UN7 NO. 3 Power EAMoR BUILOMIG ?PSTRESSING SYSTEM' o TEDOWI HISTORY..Z..TM IDE'rNTIFICATION 14UM)4ER 112 1 HW- LENTH /"' Z'SHOP WASHER ID: PC /-/ CR 5'/ FIELD WASHER IDS PCm c Z CA /Z3 1. CA11QA vendor Inspection cover letter nber-FPC 1 _Z?20 DAT. 0/74 2. Date tendon received on-site /7 -Y Wilt umber 3 v ' r rf 3. Date Installed in conduit lnstallation NCI's ___..___ _Wires removed 0 replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 4D A. Date buttonheaded , 74' buttonheadtnt HCR's _Bad wires , Accept. Rebeads _ Total Ineffective wires .5. Date stressed 2- -7 .Stressing ICR's __Date restressed _Restresslag NCR __SkOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 80Z ult.)-Pred./A ct. dLL / ~ !: ,4-/e'Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual 6PIt7 / 67ro -7 ?Og41.O NIA Shim Thicknessl8O% Ultimate Pressure N/A UnseatedlBroken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing /6 6. Date Bulk-filled , 7 ,.Y Bulk-Filling, NCR'e Time since installation 27 .w-/4A" Inlet Pressure /5' d Outlet Temp. 1657 Date end caps Tefilledi Shop ,.,_ Field ___7. Data compiled by Z. Organization __-_Date___________ _8. Additional Comments:--)' .. -.._..907 716 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 00 .Power REACTOR BUILDIN K-s) TENDON 1hISTORY.-.4FJDON IDENTIFICATION NIIHBER 'J/2 H-3 3 anwCU T Lon 'sýs f SHOP VASHIER ID: PC /Z- CR 5'.Y& FIELD WASHER ID: PC /-Z/ ciR 9f74'1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter nuaber-FPCI D T2 0 .,ATF 7_2. Date tendon received on-site /- 7-/ IMt Number 3!r _ ___ __'_ r 3. Date Installed in conduit --71 Installation NCR_'s Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective vires _4. Date buttonheaded 6-Z7 -79/ Buttonheading NiCR's Bad wires _ Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective %fires 0 5. Date stressed 7.-/ .7r Stressting Nes .NC.....Date restressed Restressing NCR's S HOP END FIELD E11D TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. M i O) 1,4(t-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actu~al 1,870 /70,0 010 14.. 1N/A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimate Pressure 7 Ys/70/0 7780 N/A Unseated/Broken Wires ___ _Total effective vires after stressing /S3 6. Date Sulk-filled --k Bulk-Filling N4CR's _Time since Installation 7 &Y-ojov/ Inlet Pressurek/._ Outlet Temp. /60d'Date end caps refilled: Shop Field 7. Data compiled by _ Organization Date 8. Additional Coments:.. ...... --- ._ .- ceku/m I95.og Aeddmdme 89" Florda CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 Power REACrOR BUILDING ?ESTFESSfING .emet,o ....TENDON 1I1STORY SHOP UASHER ID: PC /ZA CR .LV nIED WUASHER ID: PC /2/ C 7 7r 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FC I -?go DATE 2/2o/7Y 2. Date tendon received on-site /-/A 7' R Number ., 03/3. Date installed in conduit /-2/1-71 Installation N4CRlas Wires removed 0 Wires replaced t 0 Total Ineffective Wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded 7-,P 70/, Buttonheading NCR's Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total ineffective vires C 5. Date stressed ......_Z- _t -7_ _..... Stressing NCR's Date restressed _Restressing NCR'es SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 pot to 802 ult.)-1'red.IAct. r'Yi% z f,. j r 1~ .r4/%Li Ct-Off Pressure -?redictedlActual 7 ° 1/ 70/0 N/A Shim ThicknessIaoz Ultimate Pressure 7/ / ?7"I' HIA UnseatedlBroken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressin$ / 3 *6. Date Bulk-filled 7_.71 lulk-FIlling NCRP's ..__Time since installation o5ý o'i,.S4 Inlet Pressure /P " .Outlet Temp. /..Date end caps refilled: Shop __ _ _ eld 7. Data compiled by .? --. Organization Date_______________

8. Additional Coumments:

907 716 Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT N1). 3 Par an Power REAcroR. UILDIZIG PRSTP.ESSNC SYSTEM , ./ ~o"'"m TENDON HISTORY*TERON IDENTIFICATION NUM __ER 4 2 H _ wcu /L$ E. , SHOP VASUER ID: PC /ZZ CR /230 FIELD uASHER ID: PC /Z7- CR 1. GAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter number-FPC I ..b9dt2 0 ___ _o_2. Date tendon received on-site /',/ -7&/. INRK 63 3. Date Installed In conduit 1/ --74' Installation NCR'a Vires removed 0 Wires replaced _ Total Ineffective wires 0 A. Date buttonheaded 74 ' ButtonheadLng NCRes Bad wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective wires .5. Date stressed Z &-_ _ __ -7.1 _ Stressing NCR's Date restressed Restressing NCR's_SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. c/ri o~r, Jrxr I ____-Lift-Off Pressure -Predictedl/ctual (470 1 L94" 6 7S.0 N/A Shim Thickness/80Z Ultimte Pressure 4 7 N /A Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective wires after stressing / _6. Date Bulk-filled 7-J/- 7Y Bulk-Filling NCR's , It Time since installation 6 -vrw*,^4r Inlet Pressure ,______ Outlet Temp. /o Date end caps refilled: Shop __ _ _ Field -7. Data compiled by .~ A t Organization Date_____________

8. Additional Coments:_on? 71m Foriida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 est 3 le o -,o 090104NA119TENt)ON HISTORY..TENDON IDENTIFICATION NUMBER ' A .CUT LEN4GTH /$(SHOP WASHER ID: PC -/Zo / CR 5-. -FIELD WASHER ID: PC / ,." _c. ,._ _1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter nunber-FPC I _g. ... / V 2. Date tendon received on-site /1/4 -7y 3PR Number J 0 3$-1 3, Date Installed In conduit /2.I. 74V Installation OCR's ......Vires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective vWies , 4. Date but tonheaded 7-/4 -7%/ Buttonheading NCR's Bad Wires 0 Accept. Reheads 0 Total Ineffective Wires 0 S. Date stressed Z. 7 .' Stressing NCR's_Date restressed Restreusing NCR's SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL'7'Elongation (1500 pat to 80% ult.)-Pred.IAct.

Jj s& fen__S__/0, LIlft-Off Pressure -Predleted/Actual '7T / 71000 49-1. 1A6t NIA Shim Thickness/802 Ultimate Pressure 7i/ i 7k/0 6 Yr, N/A Unseated/Broken Wires 0 Total effective Wires after stressing ._ ___6. bate Bulk-filled -.... ./ 7A bulk-Filling NCR's .... ...Time since installation £ .4v&=6A .Inlet Pressure /2 Outlet Temp. /o 0 Date end caps refilled: Shop .... _...... Field 7. Data compiled by _______________Organization ________________ Date _5A01y, 8. AddItional Comments: 907 716 .Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO. 3 E~k -s~m u Power REACrOR BUtLDIIC PIaESTRESSINC SYSTEM Ae.,g TENDON IHISTORY 1pl4 IDNIDENTIMlATlO4 N4UMBER CUTI~f) J LEN=T1 /rS /SHOP WASHER ID: PC /20 CR 7Y FIELD WASHER ID: PC, /ZC .R 113 V__1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FEPCI 20 f ... DT ,/3/a.73 2. Date tendon received on-site W..3 ..?/-_'7 ..RR Number 3 ,2 '1"%3. Date install8 d In conduit I-is "5'- " I. Installation NCIL'u Wiree'removed Wires replaced _ Total Ineffective wires 0 4. Date buttonheaded /c- IC- "7 B luttonheading NCR's _Bad wires /3 Accept. Reheads /2_- Total In effective wires /5. Date'stressed '7 ) -7j Stresssing NCR's s, Date restressed ___ Restressina NCR's SHOP LID FIELD END TOTAL fElongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pte:3./Act. .' %. /" ,O '/,D40 'Litft-Otf Pressure -Predicted/Actual

• Cf)O 00 1 .... /__a_ _.shim Thickness/80%

Ultimate Pressure 7/ ,7700 e. f 7 r-,/ N/A UinseatedlBroken Wires Z.- Total effective wires after stressing let 6. Date Bulk-filled If -4 711. Bulk-Filling NCR's Time since Installation p 3cik Ine ressure Outlet remp.Date end caps refilled:' Shop "-I- "71'45 Field if /'J-1" 7. Data compiled by Z? ... Organization __ _ _.--Date F________77_______

8. Additional Comments:-q7 "71 -

Florida CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT NO* 3 ,Q Power REACTOR BUILDIti PPI:STRESSINC SYSTEMCo " TENDON 110STOPY ho lwe D4~ON IDENTIFICATION N4UMBER '169121 CUT LECTiH V__ _ __ _ _SHOP WASHER ID: PC /20 CR 14 Z FIELD WASHER ID: PC /22. CR 1. CAI/QA vendor inspection cover letter number-FPC I _________DAT_

2. Date tendon received on-site I "- I'S 3 MR Number 3 3 I 1 .3. Date Insta1l1d In conduit -" '- I4 Installation NCR's Wires removed 0 Wires replaced 0 Total Ineffective wires 0, 4. Date buttonheaded B -I*f " " .SuttonheadipS NCR's bad wires Accept. Iteheads 0 Total Ineffective wutes /5. Date stressed Q) 7 7.5 Stressing NCR's _Date restressed Restressing NCR's _SHOP END FIELD END TOTAL Elongation (1500 psi to 802 ult.)-Pred./Act. -e/r/pr/r J-.-Lift-Off Pressure -Predicted/Actual

_7 70O r&0 6730 N6?$0 UIA Shim Ihickness/8Ol Ultimate Pressure /r/7700 S'/& I7d NIA Unseated/Broken Wires C7 Total effective vires after stressing /42-6. Date Bulk-f 111.4 _j I -y- --7)p Bulk-Filling NCR' _________________ Time since Installation. k ný_ 1-,. Inlet Pressure .QO..4 ._ outlet Temp. °Date and caps refeilled: Shop & /4--i79 Field .-_- 14--75 7. Data compiled by Organization ______________ Date -A 8. Additional Comments:)nn7 71i _ ) Florda CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT RD. 3 CA.II £,o Power ELCOR BUILDINO PRESTRESSING SYSTEM 2.,51 S 0t TENION HISTORY K.TENDON IDEnTIFICATION EH 2( .arr CT LENGTH SHOP 'WASHER -ID: PC C& YIELD WASHER ID: 70C_" CR 1. CAI/QA vendor Inspection cover letter uumber-.PC I DATE " 2. Date tendon received ou-site *_ _ Number 3. Date Installed In conlduLt _nstallation ,ires removed ,," Vires replaced Total lueffeii.ve irrer..'4. Date buttonheaded ._ uttonheading NCs.Bad vires Accept. Rheadsd Total ZlUeffective vwies _5. Date stressed ,. Stressing NCR'sa Date restressed Rsstresstns NCR's SHOP ED FIELD END 7OTAL 0loutation (1500 psi to 80o ult.)-?red.Ikc:. L....

• _ e ' .*L11ft-Off Prsi -?redicted/Actual(anV)

I'1 fZS Hs 7.5# 1ZCIP ( f L .CV-oK f- F----Shia Thickness/80 Ultimate Pressure "W , , A t- 640 POO.Upseated/Broken Wires )- I F $"". Total' effective wires after utressLuul

6. Date bulk-filled

_ulk-FMIin 1CR'._s Tine since installation Pressute Outlet Temp.Data end caps refilled: Shop yield __.....7. Data compiled by OrganizatIon _IV Date __ _ _._ _".S. Additional Comments:/rI~!5rC~roAJgAF T4ý- Ce~ti) -adc-FP -- oC (Ste- sA-ý Al /SW-O 1 r-6to 0) 2121~ Il&LbAo SWL&) 0~" On '--AMlAL t, ('907 716 C CMT.AL Xrga ,MT W. 3-"L 1U113M8NG Mg-IN KMrnW- it-Co Tan o. 4G21 leaptIle fruied oao-tin a"f MMITION STMUW Ag. Ibis 111"t- Total AV$*. 4 IE Sitan- Teotl lneits l1ids.fore fares 7bliehie &ties ltileI ems Pe e te Thiaehaee l itlee ir feotiv lTosperecuw of Oviglkal 9-6 1624 55 1/ ILL

• h* N4 Itrekialg fr 421653 3j63/41* J / &AlL NL A NI& A&A lot 9-6 1458 3 /4 Xu/A S 314 V/A 1-10-78 7- i 1546 1502 3 9/16 VIA 163 1514 1536 5 9/16 VIA ) 106 41--7W J I- -! AA Al .1_1 A IA .-..&..-uz --l Je-vow a.----- a --w -------- --- ------- --S------------ --I!b'311 0 ATTACHMENT I Sheet I of I QA or Vital Records Change Form FORM RDC-NGGC-0001-1-15 Original Document Number/Description:

_.ot O -Zc. Ao. (o J 0 Li3 -01 Original Record Number (RMS (Record Nbr), STAIRS (Din Nbr), SEEK (RAN Nbr): Original Document Date: 12. 7 '7 Reason For Correction p._, _ _G- .,. -, .. #U, .. CI'&,- ,,,,.,, S:T. AO/3~ddAI -RAJdII tZA..f~ ~ ~L ~ Iv.i4.,. ,~yjij~jf* S. 1 (Z AC6 OF -I F" r CIO -SVI C Approved By: Signature OriginatingOrganization Date NOTE: When transmitting the Correction or Supplement add "Supplement" to the document title field.QA RECORD IRDC-NGGC-0001 Rev. 17 1 Page 35 of 66 1 Evaluation and Acceptance of PSC Tendon Surveillance Results (3 0 th Year)The surveillance was conducted by Precision Surveillance Corporation (PSC) between October and November 2007 with CR-3 site overview utilizing SP-182 as the controlling site procedure. The actual procedures used for testing activities were contained in the PSC In-Service Inspection Manual for Progress Energy Crystal River Unit 3 (N1002)Revision 0. This 30V year surveillance met all the requirements of ASME Section XI, subsection IWL as modified by 10CFR50.55(a). The results of this surveillance have shown that the CR-3 containment structure has not experienced abnormal degradation and is projected to meet its minimum design criteria until the end of its current forty-year life.Code Compliance. IWL-2400: Schedule CR-3 performed the Structural Integrity Test in November of 1976. The code required the 30"' year surveillance is to be performed in November of 2006 +1- 1 year. Since the 30" surveillance was performed between October and November 2007 this requirement was met.IWL-2510: Examination of Concrete The concrete was visually examined (VT-3) during the 30'h surveillance period. For areas that required further evaluation, a detailed visual exam (VT-1) was performed. The data was reviewed by the Responsible Professional Engineer (RPE) and found to* be acceptable. IWL-2520: Examination of Unbonded Post-Tensioning Systems The random selection for CR-3 resulted in three Dome, three Vertical and, 5 Horizontal tendons being selected. These tendons were D129, D212, D238, 12V01, 45V20, 61V17, 46H21, 42H46, 51H34, 62H30 and 13H36. It was later determined that 12V01 (identified as a control tendon) was retensioned during the prior surveillance. Per IWL-2521 (b), 61V08 was selected as a substitute control tendon. Although not identified as an exempted tendon the IWL-2524 and IWL-2525 examinations were performed on the original selected tendon (12V01).IWL-2522: Tendon Force Measurements Tendon force measurements were performed on the selected sample and adjacent tendons as required. All vertical and dome tendons tested this inspection period were found to have forces greater than 95% of the corresponding predicted force. Of the hoop tendons, 42H46 and 51H34 were observed with forces above 95% of their predicted force. Tendons 62H30, 46H21 and 13H36 were found to have forces below 95% but above 90% of their corresponding predicted forces. While monitoring the forces of tendons adjacent to the respective surveillance tendons, PSC NCR's FN1002-001, 002, 003, 006, 007, 008, 009, 011 and 012 were generated to document the conditions and were dispositioned by CR03ENG in AR's 251318 and 252558. After the completion of testing the adjacent tendons, all tendons with an as-found force below 95% were restored to an as-left force --0%, +6% of their corresponding predicted force in accordance with PSC Procedure SQ9.0. The acceptance criteria of IWL-3221.1 were met for all the tendons with the exception of tendon 62H30, 13H36. and 46H21. The analysis of the as-found lift-off forces contained in the PSC final report, demonstrates that the as-found condition is acceptable for these tendons. Part of the analysis is a discussion on the calculation of the predicted base value for each tendon. Historically CR-3 has found numerous tendons below the 95% of predicted base value, but demonstrated the acceptability of the containment with the as-found condition. IWL-2523: Tendon Wire and Strand Sample Examination and Testing Tendons D238. 61V17 and 51H34 were detensioned and a wire removed for testing.The acceptance criteria of IWI-3221.2 were met for all wire samples.IWL-2524: Examination of Tendon Anchorage Areas A VT-I visual examination was performed for all tendons when the end cap was removed. The detailed inspections did not reveal any cracks in the concrete adjacent to the bearing plates nor in any of the anchorage components. There were several instances of missing or broken wires observed. These instances were compared against the acceptance criteria contained in IWL-3321.3 and SP-182 and found to be acceptable. Therefore no further analysis was required for these conditions. IWL-2525: Examination of Corrosion Protection Medium and Free Water There were no instances of free water in the corrosion protection medium. The acceptance criteria of IWL-3221.4 were met for all samples taken.IWL-2526: Removal and Replacement of Corrosion Protection Medium The amount of grease removed and replaced was recorded for each tendon.1OCFR50.55(a)(b)(viii) Examination of Concrete Containments (a) During the visual exam, all grease caps were examined for leakage and deformation. No grease leakage or deformation was observed. Minor weepage continues to be observed on the intermediate building buttresses. See (d) (3)below for further discussion.(b) The evaluation of the trend data does not indicate an adverse trend.(c) The elongation of any tendon during restressing did not vary from previously recorded results by more than 10% and therefore was acceptable.(d) The following items shall be included in the RFO 15 NIS-1 report: (1) The presence of water in the grease sample. There was no water recorded for this surveillance. (2) The absolute difference between the amount of grease removed and the amount replaced did not exceed 10% of the net duct volume in any of the tendons.(3) Detection of grease leakage (if found). During the tendon accessibility walkdown PSC noted that small grease/oil leaks were occurring on multiple tendon caps, which were located inside existing structures that adjoin the containment building (adjacent to main steam and feedwater penetrations). The substance displacing from the tendon cap is actually the oil portion from the original P2 grease that has separated. This is a common occurrence that we has been noted throughout many plants which perform tendon surveillances. This condition does not correspond to the system's degradation. A small amount of oil can cause a large aesthetically unpleasing condition. On buttresses without any coating, the oil is absorbed into the concrete, leaving very little signs of leakage. However, in the existing condition, the coated surface does not allow for the absorption to occur. 0 Therefore, the oil continues to displace down the buttress face. PSC recommends this condition be monitored and cleaned on a periodic.Gasket replacement can be performed on the tendon cap, however the oil will continue to leak from the cap based on PSC's experience. The labor and material required for the gasket replacement is not cost effective and PSC does not recommend performing such task.Based on the evaluation of the In-Service Inspection results of the 3 01h Year Containment IWL Tendon Surveillance performed at CR-3 have been determined to meet the code requirements and that the containment structure has experience no abnormal degradation of the post-tensioning system. The containment post-tensioning system is performing in accordance with the design requirements and is expected to continue to do so for the remaining life of the unit.Prepared By: Reviewed By: Rick Portmann (IWE/IWL P ogra Owner)Joe Lese signated CR3 IWE/IWL RPE)Loyd Larramore (ANII)Reviewed By: 0 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: i DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 3OW" YEAR CONTAINMENT IW!. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 DOCUMENT COVER SHEET Document No: CR-1002-504 Title: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30TH YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION 0 Submittal Issue C.E. COX 01/24/08 P.C. SMITH 01/24/08 Prepared By Date Reviewed By Date No. Description j--__________ PSC SIGN OFF REVISIONS RETAINED IN HARD COPY 2E(--& S3/0(02$ I I I I I I I I I I U I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-NIO02-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: ti DOCUMENT TITLE FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30TM YEAR CONTAINMENT M&. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24108 ABSTRACT The purpose of this report is to present the results of the 2007 3 0" Year Containment IWL Inspection of the Progress Energy Florida Crystal River Unit 3 Containment Structure post tensioning system. The results of this investigation are discussed in detail in the body of this report and are summarized as follows: 1. The sheathing filler (grease) samples were tested and found to have acceptable levels of water-soluble ions, (Chlorides, Nitrates, and Sulfides). All tendon ends had a moisture content within acceptable limits. All neutralization numbers were above the IWL requirement of 0.0 mg KOHIg value and acceptable. No visible breakdown of the grease was noted either by color or consistency for all grease samples tested.2. No tendon end exhibited water during removal of the grease cap, detensioning or around the tendon anchorage.

3. Acceptable corrosion levels were found on all tendon ends and no cracks were found on any anchorage components.

Cracks in the concrete surrounding the bearing plates were all within allowable tolerance of< 0.010" 4. Additional missing or protruding buttonheads were found on two of the inspected surveillance tendons. The conditions have been reported via NCR's FN1002-004 & FN1002-010 (12V01) and FN1002-005 (61V17) to CR03ENG for disposition.

5. The IWL baseline concrete examination for Unit 3 was required to be completed by September

10. 2001.The subsequent required examination of the containment concrete was performed during this 30e Year period. However, all of the examinations associated with this IWV requirement have been performed by the Utility and the results are reviewed and reported by CR03ENG.6. The hydraulic jacks used for liftoffs, detensioning and retensioning tendons were calibrated and found to be within an acceptable variation of +/- 1.5%.7. All surveillance tendons monitored for forces this inspection period were found to have forces greater than 95% of the corresponding predicted force OR. if found below 95%, had their adjacent tendons inspected until one tendon, on both sides of the original scope tendon, met the lift-off force criteria.

All tendons, both original and adjacent found below 95% were restored to an As left force of -0%, .6% above predicted force.8. The detensioned tendons were retensioned with acceptable elongations and acceptable force levels. All test wires removed from detensioned tendons were found to have acceptable corrosion levels and acceptable yield and tensile tests.9. All tendons were resealed and regreased to acceptable levels in accordance with S012.1 of the PSC Surveillance Procedure, which is included in Appendix F.10. A comparison of "As-found" force levels to the original force levels was made in an effort to detect any evidence of system degradation. The amount of force loss since the original installation is comparable to the losses of other plants of this age and does not show any evidence of system degradation. Based on the data gathered during the 2007 300 Year Containment IWL Inspection and reported herein, the conclusion is reached that no abnormal degradation of the Post Tensioning System has occurred at the Progress Energy Florida Crystal River Unit 3 Containment Structure. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-NlO02-504 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT PROJECT TITLE: 30'M YEAR TEN REVISION: 0 PAGE: it FOR THE 30'," YEAR CONTAINMENT IMA. INSPECTION DON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 fl6-ULFMET COVFR SHEET I ARqTRAlrT li

1.0 INTRODUCTION

I TABLE 1:30. YEAR SURVEILLANCE SCOPE OF WORK 2 TABLE 2: 30Tm YEAR ADDITIONAL SCOPE OF WORK: ADJACENT TENDONS 3*i n amDyriI I Amirp DoflI'IIID A dlk* V 3.0 SHEATHING.FILLER ANALYSIS a'.5 TABLE 3: TABLE 4: TABLE 5: VERTICALS-LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATHING FILLER HOOPS-LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATHING FILLER DOMES-LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATHING FILLER 5 6 6 7 4.0 ANC TABLE 6: TABLE 7: TABLE 8: TABLE 9: TABLE 10: TABLE 11: TABLE 12: TABLE 13: TABLE 14: TABLE 15: TABLE 16: TABLE 17: TABLE 18: TABLE 19: TABLE 20: TABLE 21: TABLE 22: TABLE 23: TABLE 24: TABLE 25: HORAGE COMPONENTS 7 VERTICALS -S06.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL HOOPS -SQ6.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL DOMES -S06.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL 13H36 ADJACENT HOOPS -S06.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL 46H21 ADJACENT HOOPS -S06.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL 62H30 ADJACENT HOOPS -SQ6.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL ORIGINAL SCOPE -SQ6.1 -INSPECT FOR WATER ADDITIONAL SCOPE -S06.1 -INSPECT FOR WATER VERTICALS -S08.0 -ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITION HOOPS -S08.0 -ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITION DOMES -S08.0 -ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITION 13H36 ADJACENT HOOPS -S08.0 -ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITION 46H21 ADJACENT HOOPS -S08.0 -ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITION 62H30 ADJACENT HOOPS -S08.0 -ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITION VERTICALS -S08.0 -BUTTONHEAD COUNT HOOPS -SQ8.0 -BUTTONHEAD COUNT DOMES -S08.0 -BUTTONHEAD COUNT 13H36 ADJACENTS -S08.0 -BUTTONHEAD COUNT 46H21 ADJACENTS -SQ8.0 -BUTTONHEAD COUNT 62H30 ADJACENTS -S08.0 -BUTTONHEAD COUNT 7 8 8 9 9 10 10 11 12 13 13 14 15 16 17 18 18 19 20 21 5.0 S08.3 -CONCRETE INSPECTION TABLE 26: VERTICALS -SQ8.3 -CONCRETE INSPECTION

6.0 TENDON

ACCESSIBILITY TABLE 27: 12V & 23V SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 28: 34V & 45V SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 29: 56V & 61V SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 30: 13H SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 31: 35H SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 32: 51H SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 33: 42H SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 34: 46H SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 35: 62H SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 36: l000 SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX 22 22 21 V 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR.N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: iv DOCUMENT TITLE FINAL REPORT FOR THE 3 0'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWI INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30TM YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 TABLE 37: D200 SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX TABLE 38: D300 SERIES -TENDON ACCESSIBILITY MATRIX 7.0 HYDRAU.,LC JACK .CALIBRATIONS TABLE 39: HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATIONS 33 34 35 35 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 8.0. TENr TABLE 40: TABLE 41: TABLE 42: TABLE 43: TABLE 44: TABLE 45: TABLE 46: TABLE 47:)ON UFTOFFS VERTICALS -S09.0 -MONITORING TENDON FORCE HOOPS -S09.0 -MONITORING TENDON FORCE DOMES -S09.0 -MONITORING TENDON FORCE 13H36 ADJACENTS -S09.0 -MONITORING TENDON FORCE 46H21 ADJACENTS -S09.0 -MONITORING TENDON FORCE 62H30 ADJACENTS -S09.0 -MONITORING TENDON FORCE ADJACENTS-TENDON FORCE RESTORATION AVERAGE AS-FOUND NORMALIZED TENDON FORCE 37 37 38 38 39 39 40 41 9.0 WIRE INSPECTION AND TESTING 42 TABLE 48: S010.2 & S010.3 -VISUAL INSPECTION AND TENSILE TESTING OF WIRE 42 ir Tuf%1~h DEWTb~eifbLlhIf ALMf 0=0@MA"OMV"V*W TABLE 49: TABLE 50: TABLE 51: TABLE 52: TABLE 53: TABLE 54: TABLE 55: TABLE 56: TABLE 57: TABLE 58: TABLE 59: TABLE 60: SQ11.0- TENDON RETENSIONING VERTICALS -S012.0 -GREASE CAP REPLACEMENT DOMES -SQ12.0 -GREASE CAP REPLACEMENT HOOPS -SQ12.0 -GREASE CAP REPLACEMENT 13H36 ADJACENTS -SQ12.0 -GREASE CAP REPLACEMENT 46H21 ADJACENTS -SQ12.0 -GREASE CAP REPLACEMENT 62H30 ADJACENTS -S012.0 -GREASE CAP REPLACEMENT VERTICALS -S012.1 -GREASE LOSS VS. GREASE REPLACEMENT HOOPS -SQ12.1 -GREASE LOSS VS. GREASE REPLACEMENT DOMES -S012.1 -GREASE LOSS VS. GREASE REPLACEMENT ADJACENTS-S012.1 -GREASE LOSS VS. GREASE REPLACEMENT ADJACENTS -SQ1 2.1 -GREASE LOSS VS. GREASE REPLACEMENT 43 45 45 46 46 47 47 48 49 49 50 51 11.0 COMPARISON WiTH ORIGINAL INSTALLATION DATA TABLE 61: COMPARISON WITH ORIGINAL INSTALLATION DATA 52 12.0 STF TABLE 62: TABLE 63: TABLE 64: TABLE 65: TABLE 66: TABLE 67: tESSING TREND ANALYSIS 53 VERTICALS -REGRESSION ANALYSIS INPUT DATA VERTICALS -REGRESSION ANALYSIS OUTPUT DATA HOOPS -REGRESSION ANALYSIS INPUT DATA HOOPS -REGRESSION ANALYSIS OUTPUT DATA DOMES -REGRESSION ANALYSIS INPUT DATA DOMES -REGRESSION ANALYSIS OUTPUT DATA 53 54 55 56 57 58

13.0 CONCLUSION

59 IIAA 00r12Pr frWlflfU~klT~ 04 I -. ~, I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: v DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 301N YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 APPENDICES NO. OF PAGES APPENDIX A: SURVEILLANCE DATA SHEETS APPENDIX B: LABORATORY ANALYSIS OF SHEATHING FILLER APPENDIX C: NON-CONFORMANCE REPORTS APPENDIX D: FIELD CHANGE REQUESTS APPENDIX E: JACK CALIBRATIONS APPENDIX F: SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURE 393 12 14 2 32 247 I I I I I U I I I I I I I U I I I U I I I I U I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-NI002-504 REVISION: 0 , PAGE: I DOCUMENT TITLE. FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'm YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08

1.0 INTRODUCTION

This report details the 30* Year Containment IWL Inspection of the Progress Energy Florida Crystal River Unit 3 containment structure. The Containment Structure surveillance program is a systematic means of assessing the quality and structural performance of the post tensioning system and exterior concrete surface.The tendon surveillance program consists of a periodic inspection of the condition of a selected group of tendons.This program provides confidence in the condition and functional capability of the system, and an opportunity for timely corrective measures if adverse conditions are detected. Physical tendon surveillance consists of sheathing filler inspection and testing, anchorage inspection, force monitoring, inspection and tensile testing of removed wire samples (for detensioned tendons), retensioning of detensioned tendons and replacement of sheathing filler after completion of all inspections. Crystal River Unit 3 is currently committed to meet the requirements of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section X1, 1992 Edition with 1992 Addenda. Sub-Section IWL"Requirements for Class CC Concrete Components of Light-Water Cooled Plants". This program is also subject to the limitations and modifications of 10 CFR 50.55a(b)(2), 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(4), and 10 CFR 50.55a(g)(6). The 30m Year tendon surveillance at the Crystal River Unit 3 began on October 8, 2007 and ended on December 6.2007. This surveillance period consisted of a Physical Inspection on Unit 3. The Crystal River Reactor Building Structural Integrity Tendon Surveillance Program (SP-182), PSC Surveillance Procedures, the Code of Federal Regulations 10 CFR 50.55a and ASME Secton Xl. Sub-Section IW., define the specific requirements for selection of the inspection tendons as well as specific requirements and acceptance criteria for the performance of the inspection. A copy of the PSC Surveillance Procedures is included in Appendix F of this Surveillance Report. The tendon selection for the Surveillance is listed in the following Tables 1 and 2.RETAINED IN HARD COPY~~Ec(X Z$IOo~ I I II I I I II 1 I I I I OOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 2 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'M YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE. 30"' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01I24/08 OTM iý'TA13LE 1: 3 YEAR SURVEILLA'NJC-tiSc'-i:ýýiý6ýIW'dFýKý,r TENDON VISUAL PHYSICAL VISUAL PHYSICAL END 0 a O3 1*0.a/0 a (I)4.w a to C!NY C*n.U)('I CY 0*COMMENTS 12V01 D&G 0 * * *

• s STEAM ZONE @ DOME 45V20 D&G * * * *
• a ORIGINAL SCOPE 61V17 D&G 0
• a *
• a
• a a a DETENSION 61V08 D & G 0 0 a
• a a
• COMMON (REF. FCR-FN1002-O01) 13H36 ST. 1 &3 a
• a * *
• a 42H46 ST. 284 & 4 * * *
• a STEAM ZONE @ BT2 46H21 BT. 4 & 6
• 0
• COMMON 51H34 ST. 5 & 1 0 a a a *
• a a a a DETENSION, STEAM ZONE @BTI 62H30 ST. 5 & 2 0 * *
• STEAM ZONE @ST 2 46H07 T. 4 & 6 ALTERNATE D129 BT. 3 & 5 0
• a
• STEAMZONE

@BT3 0212 BT. 1 &3 a a a a COMMON D238 BT, 4 & 6 0 * *

• 0 * * *
• a DETENSION B337 BT. I & 5 ALTERNATE SO 6.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL SO 6.1 -INSPECTION FOR WATER SO 7.0 -AQUIRE GREASE SAMPLES SO 8.0 -ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SQ 8.3 -CONCRETE INSPECTION SO 90 -MONITOR TENDON FORCE SO 10.2 -TENDON WIRE INSPECTION SO 10.3 -TESTING TENDON WIRES SO 11.0 -RETENSION TENDONS SQ 12.1 -GREASE REPLACEMENT I I I I I I I II Once Installed on the Containment Dome, the Frames support the work platform and a hoist for the hydraulic ram.U fi 1,9, ,,lJI , kil 11 ,,,-LSt~ I ., f IL#%0~ %.%J~V" 1 I %J.JIlq V..s I I I I I U I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER CR-NI002-504 REVISION 0 PAGE: 3 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30T" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE. 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24108 ABL 21 VE~ISU OAL SCOPEHYSIC k'AL I TENDON END q V COMMENTS 4O 0 a -0Y 0 0Y C1 YC o,, ,,a ,o ) to oo, I 13H33 BT. 1 & 3 * *
• 0 0 DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 13H36 13H34 BT.I&3 0 0 0 0 0 0 DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 13H36 13H35 BT. 1 &3 *0 0 * .DUE TO LOWLIFT OFF ON 13H36 13H37 BT. 1 &3 0 *
• e DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 13H38 13H38 BT. 1 &3 a 0 0 0 DUE TO LOWLIFT OFF ON 13H38 4OH19 BT. 4 &8
• DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 46H21 46H20 BT. 4 & 6
• a 0 DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 46H21 46H22 BT. 4 & 6 0 DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 46H21 46H23 BT. 4 & 6 0
• 0 DUE TO LOW LIFTOFF ON 46H21 46H24 BT.4&6
• 0 0 DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 461-121 62H29 BT. 6 & 2
• DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 62H3O 62H31 BT. 6 & 2
• DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 62H3O 62H32 BT.6 & 2 a DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 62H30 62H33 BT6 6 & 2 0 0 0 DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 62H3O 62H34 ST.6&2 D DUE TO LOW LIFT OFF ON 62H30 NOTE..Physical inspection of 62H31 & 62H32 were only performed on the Buttress 2 end. Access restictions limited the Buttress 6 to visual inspecions only I I I I I I I SO 6.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL So 6.1 -INSPECTION FOR WATER SO 7.0 -AQUIRE GREASE SAMPLES SQ 8.0 -ANCHORAGE INSPECTION SO 8.3 -CONCRETE INSPECTION SO 9,0 -MONITOR TENDON FORCE SO 10.2 -TENDON WIRE INSPECTION SO 10.3 -TESTING TENDON WIRES SQ 11.0 -RETENSION TENDONS SQ 12.1 -GREASE REPLACEMENT RETAINFD IN HARD COPY b.*-k 30310&,=

I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 4 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30"' YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION 30r' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 2.0 SURVEILLANCE PROCEDURES Appendix F of this Surveillance Report contains the detailed procedures for conducting the tendon surveillance. The surveillance consists of the following steps: 2.1 Visual examination of sheathing filler grease.2.2 Analytical testing of sheathing filler grease samples.2.3 Inspection of the anchorage assembly of each of the surveillance tendon ends for deleterious conditions such as corrosion, cracks, broken or missing wires or buttonheads.

2.4 Inspection

of concrete surrounding the bearing plate.2.5 Measurement of the liftoff force for each physical surveillance tendon.2.6 Removal of one wire from surveillance tendons, which are detensioned for examination and testing.2.7 Retensioning of detensioned tendons and measuring the corresponding tendon elongation.

2.8 Visual

inspection for corrosion, pitting, or any significant physical change of the removed wires.2.9 Testing of wires removed from tendons for yield strength, ultimate strength, and percentage elongation at failure.2.10 Resealing tendon caps and replacement of lost sheathing filler into the tendon duct and cap.2.11 Evaluation of test and inspection results to assess the general condition of the post tensioning system.RETAINED IN HARD COPY 46 93 1O4va I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-NAL02-504 REVISRPTF: 0 PAGE: 5 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 301" YEAR CONTAINMENT IW INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124=0 3.0 SHEATHING FILLER ANALYSIS 3.1 A sample of sheathing filler (grease) was removed from each end of the surveillance tendons. Chemical tests were performed on each sample by Suburban Laboratories, Inc. The results are presented in Appendix B and are summarized in Tables 3 thru 5. In Tables 3 thru 5, "N/A" indicates that samples were not required for testing.3.2 The maximum acceptable limits are: 10 percent by weight for water content and 10 parts per million for water-soluble chlorides, nitrates and sulfides. All samples that were tested met the acceptance criteria as stated above.3.3 The sample testing report also includes the neutralization number of each grease sample. This test is generally performed by grease manufacturers on new batches of the product and is a method of determining the overbase additives in the grease. Degradation of the sheathing filler will yield a change in the acidity of the filler material as well as an increase in the ion content. The required neutralization number for the mixture of grease at Crystal River Unit 3 is greater than 0.0 mg KOH/g. This requirement was achieved by all samples tested.3.4 No detrimental condition was noted on any grease samples, and no visible breakdown of the grease by either color or consistency was noted on any of the tendons tested.I I I I I I I I I I I ION GURN TMUMIO PPM)TENDON END CHLORIDE SULFIDE NITRATE WVY, I ilm CONTENT (%wt)No. -;,ý_(mag KOHfg)TOP 40.50 '0.50 '0.50 0.19 71.5 12V01 BOT 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 0.31 51.9 TOP '0.50 10.50 '0.50 0.19 72.3 45V20 BOT 0.50 '0-50 C0.50 0.34 60.2 TOP 0.50 <0.50 '0.50 0.16 68.4 61V08 DOT 0.50 '0.50 <0.50 <0.10 48.0 TOP 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0,10 61.5 61V17 BOT 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.10 43.4 ACCEPTANCE LIMITS ITES WATER SOLUBLE CHLORIDE WATER SOLUBLE NITRATES WATER SOLUBLE SULFIDES WATER CONTENT NEUTRALIZATION NO.LIMITS LESS THAN 10.OPPM LESS THAN 10-OPPM LESS THAN 10.0PPM LESS THAN 10% DRY WEIGHT GREATER THAN 0.0 mg KOH/After the grease cap is removed, samples of grease are taken for all tendons requiring a visual or physical inspection, MOTFAIKS~r IKI ILA01fl C'NDIJ g* 3e I 0v_'3rrr I I I I I I I I I I U I I I i I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 6 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 3 0 TH YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION 30'T YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 ION CONCENTRATION (PPM)CHLORIDE SULFIDE MwtO (ma KOHlal----""- -..BT 1 0.50 C0.50 '0.50 033 454 13H36 ST 3 1.0 <0.50 '0.50 0.10 46,3 BT 2 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0 10 40.4 42H"4 BT 4 0.50 <0.50 C0.50 <0.10 43.1 ST 4 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.10 55.7-46H21 BT6 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.10 62.4 BT 1 <050 <0.50 <0.50 0.12 47.7 51 H34 BT 5 0.50 <0.50 '0.50 <0.10 40.3 BT 2 0.50 <0.50 <0.50 <0.10 34.0 62H30 BT 6 0.50 <0.50 '0.50 '0.10 48.2 ACCEPTANCE LIMITS.I MITS WATER SOLUBLE CHLORIDE LESS THAN 10.OPPM WATER SOLUBLE NITRATES LESS THAN 10.OPPM WATER SOLUBLE SULFIDES LESS THAN 10.OPPM WATER CONTENT LESS THAN 10% DRY WEIGHT NEUTRALIZATION NO. GREATER THAN 0.0 mg KOH/1UtQOa ND.lON (PPM) %WATER iiiiiiRjL 7ENO~ EN ICoENmT No.--CHLORDE ýU4J1O NITIRATE t%wt) (mg KoHwo)BT 3 0.50 '050 <050 0.91 50.2 D0129 BT 5 0,50 <050 '0.50 048 42.9 BT 1 0.50 <0.50 0.50 0.17 54,3 D212 BT 3 0.50 <0.50 '0.50 0.18 44.0, ST 4 0.50 '0.50 <0.50 0.17 45.2 D238 BT 6 0.50 '0.50 '0.50 '0.10 43.3 ACCEPTANCE LIMITS TEST LIMITS WATER SOLUBLE CHLORIDE LESS THAN 10.OPPM WATER SOLUBLE NITRATES LESS THAN 10-OPPM WATER SOLUBLE SULFIDES LESS THAN 10 OPPM WATER CONTENT LESS THAN 10% DRY WEIGHT NEUTRALIZATION NO. GREATER THAN 0.0 mg KOH/ I I I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE 7 DOCUMENT TITLE. FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30TM YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 4.0 ANCHORAGE COMPONENTS In the following discussion, all procedures referred to are included in Appendix F of this report and all data sheets are included in Appendix A.4.1 SQ6.0 -GREASE CAP REMOVAL 4.1.1 Inspection of the anchorage components began by removing the grease cap (PSC Procedure SQ 6.0).Complete grease coating (100%) was found on all tendon ends inspected. The percentage of grease coverage was recorded on Data Sheet SQ 6.0 with the results tabulated in Tables 6 thru 11.+4 WBLE6: VRTIAL, ý-;GREASE COATING (%)TENDON END GREASE CAP BUTTON HEADS ANCHOR HEAD SHIMS BEARING PLATE TOP 100 100 100 100 100 12V01 BOT 100 100 100 100 100 TOP 100 100 100 100 100 45V20 TOT 100 100 100 100 100 TOP 100 100 1030 100 100 61V08 BOT 100 100 100 100 100 TOP 100 100 100 100 100 61V17 SOT 100 100 100 100 100 Before the Grease Cap is removed, a plastic bag is taped to the concrete in order to catch any grease that might fall during removal.Ofto-W-A a& lpr% OIL a a 2 a WW% 10%,O--ýOWLB -"-r- 1 A1111`411=10 Ill I 1PkML)9FZ

• 5S-5 to &!ý,

I I I I I I I I U I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER. CR-Noo02-504 REVISION 0 PAGE: 8 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30"' YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 3 0 TM YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 Pro GREASE COATING (%)TENDON END GREASE BUTTON ANCHOR SHWAS BEARING CAP HEADS HEAD PLATE BT1 100 100 100 100 100 13H36 BT 3 100 100 100 100 100 BT 2 100 100 100 100 100 42H46 BT 4 100 100 100 100 100 ST4 t00 100 100 100 100 46H21 BTS 100 100 100 100 100 BT1 100 100 100 100 100 51 H34 ST 5 100 100 t00 100 100 BT 2 100 100 100 100 100 62H30 BT6 100 100 100 100 100_________ GREASE COATING (%) _TENDON END REmse BUTTON ANCHOR SHgM , B .AING CAP HWADS HEAD PLATE BT 3 100 100 100 100 100 0129 BT S 100 100 100 100 100 aT I 100 100 100 100 100 D212 ST 3 100 100 100 100 100 BTA4 100 100 100 100 100 0238 BT6 100 100 100 100 100 I I I I I Grease Cans are removed using an impact wrench.While workers take care to support the weight of the can filled with grease.II, LJADrI tEYIDV~EC,* ~3dO(o~ I I I I U I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION. 0 PAGE: 9 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30" YEAR CONTAINMENT IW. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 304 YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 pW.GREASE COATING TENDON END GREASE BUTTON ANCHOR SHIMS BEARING CAP HEADS HEAD PLATE BT1 100 100 100 100 100 13H33 BT3 100 100 100 100 100 STI 100 100 100 100 100 13H34 8T3 100 100 100 100 100 BT1 100 100 100 100 100 13H35 BT3 100 100 100 100 100 BT1 100 100 100 100 100 13H37 BT3 100 100 100 100 100 BTI 100 100 100 100 100 13H38 BT3 100 100 100 100 100 GREASE COATING (9/6)TENDON END GREASE BUTTON ANCHOR SHIMS BEARING CAP HEADS HEAD PLATE BT4 100 100 100 100 100 46H1 9 BT6 100 100 100 100 100 BT4 100 100 100 100 100 46120 3TO 100 100 100 100 100 BT4 100 100 100 100 100 46H22 BT8 100 100 100 100 100 BT4 100 100 100 100 100 46H23 BT6 100 100 100 100 100 BT4 100 100 100 100 100 46H24 BT6 100 100 100 100 100 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER, CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 10 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30"h YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30 T" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24108 TABLE ~ ~ *O P.1: *6H0AJCN [HOOP -I0ý.-GýA'*E'-PRrOAi GREASE COAlING (%)TENDON I END GREASE CAP BUTrON HEADS ANCHOR HEAD SHIIMS BEARING PLATE 8B2 100 100 100 100 100 62H29 BT6 100 100 100 100 100 BT2 100 100 100 100 100 62H31 BT6 100 100 100 100 100 6T2 100 100 100 100 100 62H32 BT6 100 100 100 100 100 BT2 100 100 100 100 100 62H33 BT6 100 100 100 100 100 6T2 100 100 100 100 100 620134 8T6 100 100 100 100 100 4.2 SQ6.1 -INSPECT FOR WATER 4.2.1 Water Inspections were recorded on Data Sheet SQ 6.1 and are summarized in Tables 12 and 13. No water was found in any tendon inspected or around the tendon anchorage either during removal of the grease cap or detensioning. TABLE ~ ~ ~ 12IRGNLStP Q. NPC b'Ag SIURVEILLANCE TENDONS SURVEILLANCE TENDONS WATER mlNDON END QUANIMY (OZ.)TOP 0 12V01 8OT 0 TOP 0 45V20 BOT 0 TOP 0 BOT 0 61V17 TOP 0 BOT 0 13H36 BT 3 0 WATER TENDON END QUANTITY BT 4 0 461H21 BT8 0 ST 1 0 511H34 BT 5 0 81 2 0 62H30 BT 6 .0 D129 BT 3 0 ST 5 0 D212BT 1 0 BT 3 0 42H46 BT 2 BT 4 0 0 D238 BT 4 BT 6 0 0* I I I I I I I I I 1 I U I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-NIOO?4504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 11 DOCUMENT TITLE. FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION ýN PROJECT TITLE: 31T" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 Prop ADJACENT TENDONS ADJACENT TENDONS WATER WATER TENDON END QUANTITY TENDON END QUANTITY ST 1 0 " BT 4 0 13H33 46H23 BT 3 0 BT6 0 BT 1 0 BT 4 0 1 3H34 46H424 BT 3 0 BTG a BT 1 0 BT 2 0 13H435 62H29 BT 3 0 BT6 0 BT 1 0 BT2 0 13K37 621431 BT3 0 BT6 0 STI1 0 BT 2 0 13H38 62H32 BT 3. 0 BT 6 0 BT 4 0 BT2 0 481H19 621433 ST 6 0 BT 6 0 BT 4 0 BT 2 0 481H20 621434 BT 6 0 BT6 0 6T 4 0 46H22 BT 0 0 I I I I I I I I During all phases of the can removal and inspections, the presence of water is noted and quantified. RETAINED IN HARD COPY RETAINED IN HARD COPY ac* 3,2,3 1olv-I DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'M YEAR CONTAINMENT IW. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 P1 gus I 4.3 SQ8.0 -ANCHORAGE CORROSION CONDITON 4.3.1 The anchorage components (anchorhead, buttonheads. shims and bearing plate),were inspected for corrosion level and cracks per PSC Procedure SO 8.0. The results were recorded on Data Sheet SQ 8.0 and are summarized in Tables 14 thru 19. In Tables 14 thru 19, "N/A" indicates the Anchor I.D. was not detected.4.3.2 The corrosion level for all of the inspected anchorage assemblies and wire was either: I -Bright metal; no visible oxidation. Or2- Metal reddish brown color, no pilling.4.3.3 No evidence of cracking was observed on any of the anchorage components. I TABLE 14: VERTICAL*S'-:ýtiD6rO'-ýýý!ýtH'OR*6'ttC-ORROSI;ONiCOtiDITION I HEAD PLATE I i I I I I I I I I I TOP CR650 1 1. NONE 2, NONE 2. NONE 12V01 BOT N/A 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE TOP CR650 2 2, NONE 2, NONE 2. NONE 45V20 BOT CR260 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE TOP CR933 1 1. NONE 2, NONE 2. NONE 61V08 BOT CR300 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE TOP CR943 1 1, NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 61V17 BOT CR256 1 2, NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE INDICATES CORROSION LEVEL INDICATES X OF CRACKS 1 -Bright metal, No visible oxidation. 2 -Metal reddish brown color, no pitting.3 -Metal having patches of red oxide I I I I I I I I I-I I I I I I U I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-NIO02-UM REVISION: 0 PAGE: 13 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30r" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DA7E: 01124108 II 1 I ~ I **' ***'*'11 CORROSION LEVEL, CRACKS TENDON I END ANCHOR I.D.BUTTON HEADS ANCHOR HEAD SHIMS BEARING PLATE BT I CR618 1 2. NONE 2, NONE 2. NONE 13H36 BT 3 CR1167 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE BT 2 CR1170 1 I, NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 42H46 BT 4 CR529 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT 4 CR1141 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE 46H21 BT 6 CR167 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT I CR459 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 51H34 BT 5 CR943 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE BT 2 CR96 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 62H30 87 6 CR609 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE INDICATES CORROSION LEVEL " INDICATES

1. OF CRACKS 1 -Bright metal, No visible oxidation.

2 -Metal reddish brown color, no pitting.3 -Metal having patches of red oxide.T A B6 16: DOE. NONE CO R IN ONE ,IN O ANCHOR SUtTON cmuwLV*LID. HEADS- ANCHOR B~s~ EARING HEAD PLATE D1293 CR995 1 NONE 2, NONE 2. NONE ST 5 CR886 2 2. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE BT.1 CR1032 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 0212 5T 3 CR1214 1 1, NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT 4 CR657 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 0238 FT 6 CR1029 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE INDICATES CORROSION LEVEL INDICATES

1. OF CRACKS 1 -Bright Metal, No visible oxidation.

2 -Metal reddish brown color, no pitting.3 -Metal having patches of red oxide. DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 14 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IVYL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TAL 7:I11i A DAENIPýlt A AN OAE-6R'ý1*0,N6Nb NA TENDON CORROSION LEVEL, CRACKS END ANCHOR I.D.BUTTON HEADS ANCHOR HEAD SHIMS BEARING PLATE BT 1 CR518 1 1. NONE 2, NONE 2, NONE 13H33 BT 3 CR1200 I 2. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE BT 1 CR514 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 13H34 ST 3 CR1159 I 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT I CR510 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE 13H35 ST 3 CR1158 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT I CR509 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 13H37 BT 3 CR1272 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BTI CR614 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 131H38 BT 3 CR710 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE INDICATES CORROSION LEVEL I I NONE r--. .INDICATES

1. OF CRACKS 1 -Bright Metal, No visible oxidation 2 -Metal reddish brown color, no pitting.3 -Metal having patches of red oxide.8.2 & 8.3 -CORROSION

& CRACK INSPECTION (8.2.1.1) Buttonheads Level: f (8.2.2.1) Anchorhead Level: !(8.2.2.1) Shims Level: (8.2.2.1) Bearing Plate Level: (8.2.1 & 8.2.2) Cracks (8.2.1 & 8.2.2) Cracks (8.2.1 & 8.2.2) Cracks 1A'2I A A-2-21 Cradks o Yes-Y ElYes blNo 0QN1A 19No [INIA 10 No [INIA tffNo 0QNIA forrTendon Inspetion RETAINED IN HAFD LUUVY k~t ý3eI CX-,C I DOCUMENTr NUMBER: CR-NIO02-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 15 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'm YEAR CONTAINMENT IWI. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 P*pUS I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I.- .* S. S**:"-I CORROSION LEVEL, CRACKS TENDON I END ANCHOR I.D.BUTTON HEADS ANCHOR HEAD SHIMS BEARING PLATE BT4 CR1218 t 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 46H19 BT S CR380 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT4 CR1138 2 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 46H20 BT 6 CR78 1 1, NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE BT 4 CR1140 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 46H22 ST 6 CR41 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT4 CR903 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 46H23 BT 6 CR40 1 2, NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT 4 CR1157 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 46H24 BT 6 CR14 1 2. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE INDICATES CORROSION LEVEL INDICATES

1. OF CRACKS 1 -Bright Metal, No visible oxidation.

2 -Metal reddish brown color, no pitting.3 -Metal having patches of red oxide.Corrosion Inspection for Tendon D2381BT6 8.2 a 8.3 -CORROSION & CRACK INSPECTION (8.2.1.1) Buttonheads (5-.22.21) Anchorhead (8.2.2.1) Shims (8.2.2.1) Bearing Plate Level: 1 4" (8.2.1 & 8 2.2) Cracks C] Yes (2)Level: I -(8.2.1 & 8.2.2) Cracks [] Yes (2)Level: fit (8 2.1 & 8.2.2) Cracks .C1 Yes ", Level: , (1 (8.2.1 & 8.2.2) Cracks C1 Yes I"'(1 -Corrosion Levels of 3. 4. 5 or 6 required an NCR.-1_ A kplkM n othn cracks tn Sketch Sheet 8.0 and iniiate an NCR.fNo 0 N/A'S No 0 N/A 1B No O NIA 1L.No 0 N/A Eti:IAINED WN HARD COPY I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 16 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30" YEAR CONTAINMENT IW. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE. 01124108 J'J4~i -.A Lý0ýýFý'I-Jk-'--k 6 tý"O.O'N H kG !-R :'7tNtCNE)

• • 0Fbs CORROSION LEVEL, CRACKS TENDONI END ANCHOR I.D.BUTTON HEADS ANCHOR HEAD SHIMS BEARING PLATE-iii- -i BT2 CR393 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 62H29 BT 8 CR1113 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT 2 CR164 1 1. NONE 2, NONE 2. NONE 62H31 BT 6 CR958 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE BT 2 CR75 1 1, NONE 2, NONE 2. NONE 62H32 BT 6 CR960 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT 2 CR77 1 1, NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE 62H33 BT 6 CR538 1 1, NONE 2. NONE 2. NONE BT 2 CR25 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE 62H34 BT 6 CR900 1 1. NONE 2. NONE 2, NONE INDICATES CORROSION LEVEL -.1. NONE INDICATES

1. OF CRACKS 1 -Bright Metal, No visible oxidation.

2 -Metal reddish brown color, no pitting.3 -Metal having patches of red oxide.8.2 & 8.3 -CORROSION & CRACK INSPECTION (8.2.1.1) Buttonheads (8.2.2.1) Anchorhead (8.2.2.1) Shims (8.2.2.1) Bearing Plate Level: I I Level: Level: j Level: j (8.2.1 & 8.2.2) Cracks 0 Yes "I (8.2.1 & 8.2,2) Cracks DYes '2'(8.2.1 & 8.2.2) Cracks 0 Yes 121 (8.2.1 & 8-2.2) Cracks C Yes rn)mor 6 required an NCR.tch Sheet 8.0 and inflte an NCR No[No No O N/A C N/A O N/A o N/A Corrosion Inspection for Tendon D212/BT1 RETAINED IN MAKU COPY R-Ec*- -ýe-15 04 I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 17 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30"' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 4.4 SQ8.0 -BUTTONHEAD COUNT 4.4.1 The inspection for protruding and missing buttonheads was performed and documented per PSC procedure SQ 8.0. The buttonheads were inspected for their physical condition. This inspection is performed to acquire information on the function of the tendon, since the original installation or previous surveillance. A missing and/or protruding buttonhead decreases the amount of effective wires in the tendon.All conditions for buttonheads and wires, whether missing or defective, have been documented. The results of these inspections are recorded on Data Sheet SQ 8.0, and are summarized in Tables 20 thru 25. In Tables 20 thru 25, "N/A" indicates no inspection was performed. 4.4.2 No additional protruding/missing buttonheads were detected on any of the inspected tendon ends except tendons 12V01 both ends and 61V17 shop (top) end. 12V01 shop was found with I wire protruding that was not previously reported, NCR FN1002-010 was written to document this finding. The field end of 12V01 was identified as having 3 missing buttonheads not previously reported and was documented on NCR FN1002-004. 61V17 had one (1) additional missing buttonhead that was recorded on NCR FN1002-005. The stated conditions have been submitted to CR03ENG for disposition. 4.4.3 All of the other tendon ends with missing or protruding wires have been previously documented and accepted, either at original installation or during a previous inspection. 4.4.4 In addition to the nominal 163 stressed wires, the anchorheads have another hole in which a test wire was originally installed on some tendons. The cases in which the surveillance test wire was found to be missing or not installed has been documented for all tendons, however a missing test wire has no bearing on the ability of a tendon to carry force. The documentation of this condition is purely for informational purposes.I 2 E ORIGINAL AS FOUND AS LEF IUNDOW N D1 WZ!AL loEt L 0 06 rg IL TOP 1 0 2 0 2 0 0 161 181 12V01 BOT 0 2 0 5 0 5 0 158 158 TOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 45V20 SOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 TOP 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 61V08 SOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 61VI? TOP 0 1 0 2 0 2 1 161 160 BOT 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 163 162 I I I I I I I I I I I I I Iý7_0 DOCUMENT NUMBER: DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: CR.N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 18 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 301" YEAR CONTAINMENT PA INSPECTION 30m' YEAR TEN DON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08'--BE2*1:ICOS o(S 0!-iUToNH 3 0OUN'ORIGINAL AS FOUND AS LEFT TENDON END wu W I-ix OR L 0 0Z 0go 0 w.uZO Ow 0 P&ILCo 0a, w (w 0 ,W U.j BT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 13H36 BT 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 8T 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 42H46 BT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 153 163 BT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 46H21 BT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 183 163 BT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 163 162 51H34 BT 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 163 162 BT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 183 62H30 5T6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 I I I I I I I I I TAL 22 .3bMSý,ý 9SbdIBTOHA ON i I I I i i i U I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-Nt002-504 REVISION 0 PAGE: 19 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30"' YEAR CONTAINMENT IVL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 3 0 T" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 TAL 23 133 ASt.tT 'Q8 :B TOH AWON ORIGINAL ASIFOUND AS LEFT 00 0 TENDON END a % wswt l1g w w~rE 0 BT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 13H33 BT 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 BT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 13H34 ST 3 0 0 0 "0 0 0 0 163 163 BT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 13H35 BT 3 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 162 162 BT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 13H37 BT 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 BT 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 13H38 BT 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 r.I'rOOOOOO000O00 000000000000 0000000000000 0 000000000 000000000 0 o000000oooooo 000000ooooo ooY ooooo Buttonhead Inspection for Tendon D 129/BT5 RETAINED IN HAHU UUrT I I I I I I I I I I D DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 20 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT MA. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 ORIGINAL I AS FOUND AS LEFT TENDON END a I A.ii'U a I-0 0.ii 0(0ý1.--ft 50 WE 0:0 W in 2!20 161 U.BT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 46H19 BT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 BT 4 3 0 3 0 3 0 0 160 160 46H20 BT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 BT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 46H22 T" 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 BT4 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 161 161 46H23 ST 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 BT 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 46H24 BT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 1 I I I I I I I I I/\.2, oooooo not 0 o o 000000 000000000 000000000000 0o000 0000000 000000000000 0000000000000 00000000000 000000 000 00 000(o00oooooooo oo. 0 10 tit fAINED IN HARD~ COPY AEC*z se831oloz I I I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 21 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'm YEAR CONTAINMENT IW.L INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30W YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 EMU* em *. *aL TA L 25 623 A IJ INS-S8! ~-T-b HW ;b, ORMGINAL AS FOUND AS LEFT I C TENDON END ZI jO 0 E .w -o ~0~ WZ o ~~ ml 0I 40 4u www--i--BT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 62H29 BT6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 BT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 62H31 BT 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 BT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 62H32 BT8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 ST 2 .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 62H33 BT 8 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 162 162 BT 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 163 163 62H34 BT 6 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 162 162 rasi,^Ivr.b 00000000 0000000000 00000000000 00000oo0000 0000000000000 0000000000000 0000000000000 0000000000000 o0 ooo0ooooooo00000000000 ýBurttonhead Inspection for Tendon D1291BT3 RiETAINED lN HARD GCFLY P-E 4t- S 3 S/O(O0 -- I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 22 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30TM YEAR CONTAINMENT PA. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30 T 1 YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 5.0 SQ8.3 -CONCRETE INSPECTION 5.1 A VT-1C Detailed inspection in accordance with PSC Procedure S08.3 was performed on the 24" around the bearing plate. This detailed inspection is performed in order.to detect any cracks in the concrete greater than 0.010" in width. The results were recorded on Data Sheet SQ 8.3 and summarized in Table 26.5.2. None of the inspected tendon ends exhibited concrete cracks exceeding 0.010' around any bearing plate inspected. C T0 0lq I I I I I I I I I I I I I I TENDON END ING CRACKS WITH WIDTHS > 0.010" QUANTITY L TMAXIMUM I MAXIMUM LENGTH IlNi A IWIDTNinI TOP NONEFOUND 0 0 0 12V01 BOT NONE FOUND 0 0 0 TOP NONE FOUND 0 0 0 45V20 BOT PC58 0 0 0 TOP NONE FOUND 0 0 0 61V08 BOT NONE FOUND 0 0 0 TOP NONE FOUND 0 0 0 61V17 SOT NONE FOUND 0 0 0 BT I NONEFOUND 0 0' 0 13H36 BT3 NONEFOUND 0 0 0 BT 2 NONE FOUND 0 0 0 421H46 BT4 NONE FOUND 0 0 0 BT4 NONE FOUND 0 0 0 46H21 STO NONEFOUND 0 0 0 STI NONE FOUND 0 0 0 51 H34 BT5 NONEFOUND 0 0 0 BT 2 NONE FOUND 0 0 0 62H30 BT6 NONEFOUND 0 0 0 BT 3 NONEFOUND 0 0 0 D129 BT 5 NONEFOUND 0 0 0 BTI NONE FOUND 0 0 0 D212 BT 3 NONE FOUND 0 0 0 BT4 NONE FOUND 0 0 0 0238 BT6 NONE FOUND 0 0 0 I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 23 DOCUMENT TITLE- FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 I I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I I I 6.0 TENDON ACCESSIBILITY 6.1 The PSC field personnel performed a general examination for tendon accessibility during this surveillance period. This examination was performed in order to assist CR03ENG in the planning of future surveillances. The results are summarized in Tables 27 thru 38.6.2 During this examination it was noted that small grease/oil leaks were occurring on multiple tendon caps, which were located inside existing structures that adjoin the containment building. The substance displacing from the tendon cap is actually the oil portion from the original P2 grease that has separated. This is a common occurrence that has been noted throughout many plants during tendon surveillances. This condition does not correspond to the system's degradation. A small amount of oil can cause a large aesthetically unpleasing condition. On buttresses without any coating, the oil is absorbed into the concrete, leaving very little signs of leakage. However, in the existing condition, the coated surface does not allow for the absorption to occur. Therefore, the oil continues to displace down the buttress face.PSC recommends this condition be monitored and cleaned on a periodic basis. Gasket replacement can be performed on the tendon cap, however the oil will continue to leak from the cap based on our experience. The labor and material required for the gasket replacement is not cost effective and PSC does not recommend performing such task.TABLE~~~~~~ 27.2 &2VSSiS-TNO ACE5111. TR 0 U)12V01 TA BL 23V01 T 12V02 TB 23V02 12V 01 T & 0 23V 03 TAB 12V 04 TAB 23V 04 TAB 12V 05 TA B 23V 05 TAB 12V 04 TAB 23V 06 TAB 12V 07 TAB 23V 07 TAB 12V 08 TAB 23V 08 TAB 12V 09 TAB 23V 09 TAB 12V 10 TAB 23V 10 T AB 12V10 TAB 23Vll TAB 12V 12 TAB 23V 12 TAB 12V 11 TAB 23V 11 TAB 12V 12 TAB 23V 12 TAB 12V 13 T&8 23V 13 TAB 12V 14 TAB 23V 14 TAB 12V15 T&B 23V 15 TAB 12V 16 TAB 23V 16 T A B 12V 17 TAB 23V 17 TAB 12V18 TAB 23V18 TAB 12V 19 TAB 23V 19 TAB 12V 20 T& 23V 20 TAB 12V 211 TA&B !23V 21 TA&B 12V 22 TAB 23V 22 T&B 12V 23 TAB 23V 23 TAB 12V 24 TAB 23V 24 TAB I *

• I T = TOP CAN B -BOTTOM END I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002.504 REVISION:

0 PAGE: 24 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30IM YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30TM YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I-TB E2- 34m5'ER'S

• ENO A-ES bLITM TiX a- US to aac tL w K 16WU.a .kl00 to U) 0 t 34V 01 T&B 45V 01 T A B 34V 02 TAB 45V 02 T&B 34V 03 T&B 45V 03 TAB 34V 04 T&B 45V 04 T&A 34V 05 TAB 45V 05 TA8 34V 06 T&B 45V 06 TAB 34V 07 T&AB 45V 07 T A B 34V 08 TAB 45V 08 TAB 34V 09 TAB 45V 09 T&B 34V10 TAB 45V10 T&B 34V11 TAB 45V11 TAB 34V12 T&B 45V12 T&B 34V 13 TSB 45V 13 T&B 34V 14 TAB 45V 14 T&B 34V15 TAB 45V15 TAB 34V16 T&B 45V16 T&B 34V 17 T& 1 45V 17 TAB 34V 18 TAB 45V I8 T&B 34V 19 TAB 45V 19 TA B 34V 20 TAB 45V 20 T&B 34V 21 T&B 45V 21 TAB 34V22 T&B 45V22 T&A 34V 23 TAB 45V 23 TAB 34V 24 TAB 45V 24 TAB mmýT TOP CAN B = BOTTOM END I U U I I I I U I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION:

0 PAGE: 25 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 3 0"' YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30TM YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 TrBL:2:.5V, 6VSElk TND N'~-CtýS6I!ITYM TRX.--U'I I j 4II 4 wS2 j U 40 V5; R!Z 56V 01 TAB 61V 01 TAB 56V 02 TAB 61V 02 TAB 56V 03 TAB 61V 03 TAB 56V 04 TAB 61V 04 TAB 56V 05 TAB 61V05 i TAB 56V 06 TAB 61V 06 TAB 56V07 TAB 61V07 TAB 56V 08 TAB eiv 08 TAB 56V 09 TAB 61V 09 TAB 56V 10 TAB 61V 10 TAB 56V 11 TAB 61V 11 TAB 56V 12 TAB 61V 12 TAB 58V 13 TAB 61V 13 TAB 56V14 TAB 61V14 TAB 56V15 TAB 61V15 TAB Sv is TAB 61V16 T&B 56V 17 TAB 61V 17 T & 8 56Vis TAB 61V 18 TAB 56V 19 TAB 61V 19 TAB 56V20 TAB 61V 20 TAB 56V21 TAB 61V 21 TAB 56V 22 TAB 61V 22 T A B 56V 23 TAB 61V 23 TAB 56V 24 TAB 61V 24 TAB-a I I i T " TOP CAN B = BOTTOM END I U I I I I I I I I I U I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-NIO02-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 26 W DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30"' YEAR CONTAINMENT IWI. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08-30 13 EIS ENO M TI v =. .Z W Z1- 0 up (4a4 W w U.l IIL 13H 01 B3 a1 13H 25 818B3 13H 02 81 & 83 13H 26 81 & 83 13H 03 81 & B3 13H 27 B1 & B3 13H404 B1 A 13 13H 28 81 & 83 13H 05 81 83 13H 29 81 & B3 13H 06 81 B3 13H 30 B1 & B3 13H 07 B1 B3 13H 31 81 &B3 13H 08 81883 13H 32 B1 & B3 13H 09 B3 B1 13H 33 81 & 83 13H 10 B3 B1 13H 34 81 &83 13H11 83 81 13H135 , B1 &83 13H 12 03 B1 13H 36 81 &83 13H 13 B3 e1 13H 37 Bi & B3 13H 14 83 Ba 13H 38 B1 & 83 13H 15 B3 81 13H 39 B1 & 83 13H 16 83 B1 13H 40 81 & B3 13H 17 83 e1 13H 41 81 & B3 13H 18 B1 B3 13H 42 81 & 83 13H 19 81 B3 13H 43 81 & 83 13H 20 B1 & B3 13H44 B1 & B3 13H 21 BI&B3 13H145 BI1&83 13H122 e8&83 13H146 81&83 13H 23 81 & 83 13H 47 B1 & B3 13H 24 B1 & S3 81 = BUTTRESS 1 END 83 = BUTTRESS 3 END I 1 ý7.DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002.504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 27 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30TM YEAR CONTAINMENT IW. INSPECTION DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: 30'm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I S S S U S S S 35H 01 35H 02 35H 03 35H 04 35H 05 35H 06 35H 07 35H 08 35H 09 35H 10 35H 11 35H 12 35H 13 35H 14 35H 15 35H 16 35H 17 35H 18 35H 19 35H 20 35H 21 35H 22 35H 23 35H 24 83 & 85 B3 & B5 B3 & B5 B3 & B5 83 & 65 B3 B5 83 & B5 B3 BS B3 B5 B3 B3 B3 B3 & B5 B3 & 85 83 & e5 B3 & B5 B3 B3 B3 B3 83 & B5 B3 & 85 85 35H 25 35H 26 35H 27 35H 28 35H 29 35H 30 35H 31 35H 32 35H 33 35H 34 35H 35 35H 36 35H 37 35H 38 35H 39 35H 40 35H41 35H 42 35H 43 35H 44 35H 45 35H 46 35H 47 B3 & B5 83&B5 B3 & B5 838 85 B3& B5 83&B5 B3& 65 83& 85 83 &B5 83£85 63 & B5 838& 5 63 & 85 133 85 B3& B55 838& 85 83 & B5 83& B5 83 & B5 8388 5 B3 & B5 B3& 05 838 815 B5 85 85 85 B5 85 I I I I I I 83 = BUTTRESS 3 END 85 = BUTTRESS 5 END I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 28 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30r YEAR CONTAINMENT IW. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 3OT" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 nABLE m m 5 II I W z u.a (.I3 W I I.2 "Zn F: L 5r -.z -i to J r 0) 0I (.J L)cow#j_A. Q U)L j )0 I 51H 01 B9 85 51H 25 & as SIH 02 81 B5 51H 26 91 a 65 511H03 81 85 51H 27" el & 85 51H 04 B1 as 51H 28 91 &85 51H 05 BI 85 51H 29 BI & B5 51H 06 B1 85 51H 30 B1&85 51H 07 91 B5 51H 31 B1 & B5 51H 08 al & 85 51H 32 B1 & Bs 51H 09 01 51H 33 91 & 85 51H 10 8 al 51H 34 B1 & a5 51H 11 Bi&B5 51H 35 a1 & 85 51H 12 91 as 51H 36 81885 51H 13 B1 B5 51H 37 BI & 85 51H 14BI 85 51H 38 B1 & 85 51H 154i5H3 1&B 51H 15 81 65 51H139 415 &1 51H 1 Bi & 85 511H 41 E1a85 51H 18 BI & B5 51H 42 81 & B5 51H 18 B1 &65 51H 42 B6 &85 51H 19 9169B5 51H 43 8168B5 51H 20 91 95 51H44 B1 & B5 51H121 51 85 511145 9168S5 51H 22 al as 51H 46 B16 85 51H 23 81 & as 51H 47 B1 & B5 51H 24 B1 & 85 I I I I i B1 -BUTTRESS I END B5 = BUTTRESS 5 END I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-NI002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 29 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30Tm YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'M YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 M k V',4' n,ý-Pi Emw I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I B It'-1LE 3:42 SEIJS"- T ENO ACSILTYM RX z 02 84 268 003 42H 03 84 82 421"127 825&84 42H 04 64 82 42H 28 825&84 42H 05 82 84 421129 825&84 4210 B264 42Hz30 62 & 84 42H 07 82 84 42H 31 825&84 421108 84 82 42H 32 825&84 42H09 4 82 42H33 82 & 84 42H10 84 62 4234' 12.1684 42H 11 826 & 4 42H 35 B2 & 84 42H 12 64 &2 42H 36 82 & 24 42H 13 84 82 42H 37 82584 42H 14 84 82 42H 38 B2 A 84 42H 15 84 62 42H 39 B2 & B4 42H 16 84 i 2 42H 40 62 & 84 42H 17 2 &84 42H 41 B2 & 84 42H 18 24 84 42H 42 82 & B4 42H 19 B2484 42H 43 82 & B4 42H 20 B2584 42H44 B2 & 54 42H 121 2 & 84 42H 45 82 & 84 42H 22 B284 42H 46 B2 & 84 42H 123 B2 4 42H 47 B2 & 84 42H 124 5 B2 4 3 B2 & B4 I I I I I i 82 -BUTTRESS 2 END 84 = BUTTRESS 4 END DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT PROJECT TITLE: 30TH YEAR TEN REVISION: 0 PAGE: 30 FOR THE 30 YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL. INSPECTION IDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 TABL.34 46H SE(E TEDNkC -*S L-Y~R I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I z (A0 (I) l 0 zL (U. 3.j~on!U r I w LI 00 4U...I U

• I I 46H 01 46H 02 46H 03 46H 04 46H 05 46H 06 46H 07 46H 08 46H 09 46H 10 46H 11 46H 12 46H 13 46H 14 46H 15 46H 16 46H 17 46H 18 46H 19 46H 20 46H 21 46H 22 46H 23 46H 24 B4 &6 54 &88 84 & B6 B4 & B8 B4 & 88 B4 B4&B6 B4 & B8 84 B4 B4 B4 &888 64 &&B B4 &868 848B6 B548B 54&88 54&88 84 84 & B8 06 B6 86 148 54&868 B8 B6 86 46H 25 46H 26 46H 27 46H 28 46H 29 46H 30 46H 31 46H 32 46H 33 46H 34 46H 35 46H 36 46H 37 46H 38 46H 39 46H 40 46H 41 46H 42 46H 43 46H 44 46H 45 46H 46 46H 47 84886 84 &B8 549868 B4 & 86 84&B6 54888B B4 &B8 54&888 84 & 88 B4 & 85 B4 & 16 84 & 86 B4 & 86 84& 68 BA&B6 B4&86 B4 &B6 4e& B6 B4& BO B48& B8 54888 548 B6*
• i a i i 84 = BUTTRESS 4 END B6 = BUTTRESS 6 END I DOCUMENT NUMBER-DOCUMENT TITLE: PROJECT TITLE: CR-NI002-U04 REVISION:

0 PAGE: 31 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 3011 YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL. INSPECTION 30Tm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 I I I I I I I U I U I I I U I I I ABLE 01:62S~lg 82 & NbB6 62H 25S *B2 8f,Y B6..0w 3o w u 0B. (3 Vg 2H 066 6 0.62H 01 8286 62H 25 2 &86 62H 02 82 86 62H 26 82 86 62H 03 82 86 62H 27 B2 & 86 62H 04 a6 82 62H28 82 8& 6 62H05 6 8 B6 62H29 82886 62H06 82 8 Be 62H 30 82 & 86 62H 07 86 B2 62H 31 82 86 62H 08 86 B2 62H 32 82 B6 62H09 82 B62 62H 33 B2 886 62H 10 B2 B6 62H 34 B2 8&8S 62H 11 82 86 62H 35 B2 8 B6 62H12 62 9 86 62H36 82 86 62H 13 82 B6 62H 37 B2 8 B6 62H14 62 B6 62H 38 B2 & S6 62H 61 B2 66 62H 439 2 & 86 62H 16 86 B2 62H 40 82 8& 6 62H 17 86 82 62H 41 B28&86 62H18 62 &886 62H 42 628&66 62H419 B2 86 62H 43 828&86 62H 20 62 86 62H44 B28&68 62H 21 B28&65 62H 45 828&86 62H 22 82 &866 62H 46 62886 62H 23 82 8 B6 62H 47 B2 886 62H 24 82 8& 6 B2 -BUTTRESS 2 END B5" BUTTRESS 6 END I'DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR REVISION. 0 PAGE: 32 FOR THE 3 0 TM YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION IDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I z lIE 0.j 1§1> 11.j z ku C,0 9. m oSuJ.~j Q) (A..j I -6 4' 4, D 101 D 102 D 103 O 104 D 105 D 106 D 107 o 108 D 109 D 110 Dill D 112 0113 0114 D115 D 116 0 117 D 118 D 119 0120 D121 D122 D 123 D 124 B2/3 & B556 B213 & B5,'6 B2/3 & B5/82/3 & 8B5 B2/ & B5S B213 & B5 B2/3 B2/3 & B56 B2/3 & 85/8 B2/3 & B54 8213 & B541 82/3 & B65 62f3 & 8518 B2m3 & B5/8 SB213 & B56B B2/3 & B5/82/3 & B5/6 B213 & 85/6 8 213 & B5AB 82/38&85/8 B2/3 & 85/6 B2/3 & B56 B2m3 & 8516 B5/6 0 125 o 126 D 127 D 128 D 129 D 130 O 131 D 132 D 133 O 134 D 135 D 136 D 137 D 138 D 139 o 140 0 141 2/38 & 85/am 2& B/8 B2/3 & B5/8 B2/3 & B65 82n & 65/8 82n & 85/6 82/38 85/8 B2r41 B241 82n3 82/3 am 82/3 & B5 2/36 & 5/6 82/3 & 6515 B5/8 B5/6 85/8 B5/6 B5/8 6516 65/6 i m i I I B213 -BUTTRESS 2-3 END 8516 a BUTTRESS 5-6 END I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-Nt002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 33 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30T" YEAR CONTAINMENT W& INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24/08 I I I UE17 D`206s iR-i-i z JI-muj o go@0 i.j0 S pi I.02 I.J W ro!~m.L 140 JI~5 jWu_____I I__ _ Il I I__ _ _&_ __ _ _ _D 201 D 202 D 203 0 204 D 205 D 206 D 207 o 208 o 209 D 210 D211 D212 0 213 D 214 0215 D 216 D 217 D 218 D 219 D 220 D 221 0222 o 223 D 224 B115 & B3/4 B1/6 & B314 B1/6 & 1334 B1/6 & B3/4 81/6 & B314 61168 & 314 8116 & B3/4 8188 & B3/4 8116 & B3/4 B118 A B314 B116 & B3/4 8116 & B314 B116 & 8314 B1/888 3/4 911588314 B1/6 & B314 B1/8 & B314 B116 & B314 8118 &8314 B1/6 & 8314 118/6 B3/4 83/4 B1168 & 83/4 8116 & B3/4 B1/68 & B3/4 5116 & 83/4 D 225 D 226 0227 0 228 D 229 D 230 O 231 0 232 D 233 D 234 D 235 D 236 D 237 D 238 O 239 D 240 D 241 B1/6 & B3/4 81/5 & 8314 816 & B3/4 8116 & 83/4 81168 & B314 B1/6&B3/4 B116 & B3/4 B1/8 & 8314 B1/88 & 3/4 B1/8 & B3/4 B1/5 & B3/4&3/4 B1/6 & B3/4 81/6 & B314 BI/6 & B3/4 B1168 & 83/4 B1/6&83/4 B1/e 8116 8116 = BUTTRESS 1-6 END 8314 = BUTTRESS 3-4 END I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U DOCUMENT NUMBER CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 34 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30Tm YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE 30T' YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08*ALJE--,S9zo I 65-1661LREI -ýkfit-j j .04AC "ESýrlbiLAITYVýIIIMý 1.z 4i ,, WZ JZ- JO 0- -- u u.Z>.I Q j 0- A (o 4L U)0 ))- I 0 301 B1/2 & 68415 D 325 B/2 & B45 302 1/2 & 6415 D 326 81/2 & B4/5 D303 B112 & B415 D 327 81/2 6A415 D 304 61/2 & 64/5 0328 81/2 & 645 D 305 B112 & B415 D 329 81/2 & 64/5 D 306 112 & 84/5 0330 B112 & W5 D 307 B1)2 & B415 D 331 BI62 & 64/5 0 308 B112 A 4)5 D 332 B1/22 & B5 0 309 61/2 & 6415 D 333 B112 B4/5 D 310 11/2 & B4/5 0 334 81/2 8415 D 311 B1/2 & B415 D 335 3112 B4/5 D 312 B112 & B415 0 336 B112 84/5 D 313 611/2 & 64/5 D 337 B112 841/D 314 81/2 & 64/5 D 338 B112 B4/5 0315 81/2 & B4/5 D 339 612 & B64/5 0316 e112 & B415 0340 B112 &B45 0317 B12 & 86415 D 341 B/2 64/5 0 318 61126&684/5 0319 61/2 & 64/5 D 320 81/2 & 4/5 0 321 B/2 & 6415 0 322 B1/2 & B415 D 323 B1/2 & 6485 0324 81/2 68415 61/2 BUTTRESS 1-2 END 6415 , BUTTRESS 4-5 END I I I I U DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 35 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'M YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 7.0 HYDRAULIC JACK CALIBRATIONS

7.1 Precision

Surveillance Corporation has developed a program for calibrating hydraulic jacks utilizing regression analysis (PSC Procedure QA 12.8.G-W). This is a process where a straight line is mathematically best fit to a set of data points (in this case, force versus gauge pressure). This results in a linear equation which relates the ram area (slope) and constant (y-intercept) for each jack calibration, allowing the conversion of pressure to force and vice versa. Completed calibrations for all of the hydraulic jacks used are contained in Appendix G and are summarized in Table 39.7.2 A before and after comparison of the stressing jacks' ram areas revealed that none of the hydraulic jacks'calibrations varied by more than 1.46%, indicating that they were in a properly calibrated status.Acceptable variation is 1.5%7.3 The wire-testing ram, 1.0.#7702. was also found within the acceptable variation. 7.4 Note that the force exerted by a jack can be calculated as follows: Force = Area x Pressure + Constant I I I U I I I I I I U I I U (F) (in2) (KSI)(K)-T_______________H_______AULI JAC CAIBAIO* 1flV BEFORE SURVEILLANCE I AFTER SURVEILLANCE 33 =JACK[a.* r&C 0i II.a 8 U.I 4('I*8780 9W24/0? 335.282 -5.022 1906.09 12111/07 336,220 -4344 1912.11 5700 316 8784 9/24/07 337.287 -5.060 1917.48 12112/07 335.547 -13.489 1899.13 5700 +0.96 9501 9/25/07 372.057 ,3.814 193851 12/13107 366.254 .5.666 1910.19 5200 +1 46 7702 05/08/07 1.590 #0.146 13661 11/30/07 1.579 #0-303 13.725 8500 -0.464 I DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30' YEAR CONTAINMENT IW. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 U 8.0 TENDON LIFTOFFS 3 8.1 MONITOR TENDON FORCES 8.1.1 A liftoff is defined as the force required to lift the anchor head off the shim stack and is representative of the force held by that tendon. A liftoff is performed on each physical surveillance tendon to monitor the force exerted by the tendon onto the structure. PSC Procedure SO 9.0 in Appendix F details the steps taken to perform a liftoff. The results were documented on Data Sheet SO 9.0 and are summarized in Tables 40 thru 45.8.1.1.1 It should be noted that performing a liftoff has only a localized effect on a tendon; therefore, it is acceptable to use the same jack for both ends of a tendon by executing the liftoff on separate occasions. 8.1.2 All of the vertical and dome tendon liftoffs were found to be above the minimum design and above 95%Predicted Force as required by IWL-3221.1. Three of the five horizontal surveillance tendons were found to be below 95% Predicted Force but above 90% Predicted Force. The liftoff requirement stated in IWL is: 3Tendon forces are acceptable if: (a) The average of all measured tendon forces, including those measured in IWL-3221 .1 (b)(2), for each type of tendon is equal to or greater than the minimum required prestress specified at the anchorage for that type of tendon;(b) The measured force in each individual tendon is not less than 95% of the predicted force unless the following conditions are satisfied: (1) the measured force in not more than one tendon is between 90% and 95% of the predicted force;(2) The measured forces in two tendons located adjacent to the tendon in IWL-3221.1(b)(1) are not less than 95% of the predicted forces; and (3) The measured forces in all the remaining sample tendons are not less than 95%of the predicted force.8.1.3 Based upon the unacceptable horizontal tendon liftoffs, adjacent tendons were monitored for force until an acceptable liftoff reading was obtained on both sides of the selected tendon- 13H36 required testing of 5 adjacent tendons, 46H21 and 62H30 also required testing of five adjacent tendons. Of these tendons, six were above 95%, five were between 95% and 90% and four fell just below 90%. All tendons below 95% were restored to Predicted Force -0%, + 6% and locked off. The restoration of these tendons is summarized in Table 46.8.1.4 The average of the As-Found normalized liftoff values was above the minimum requirement, despite the low liftoffs, and deemed acceptable per PSC Procedure S09.0 Section 10.4.8.1.4.1 The average normalized tendon force in Unit 3 for each group and their respective minimum design are: Vertical Tendon: Group Average = 1535.2 Kips Minimum Design = 1149 Kips Hoop Tendon: Group Average = 1347.4 Kips Minimum Design = 1252 Kips Dome Tendon: Group Average = 1367.3 Kips Minimum Design = 1215 Kips 8.1.4.1.1 As depicted above, all group averages are above the required group minimum and are therefore acceptable. The actual values for each tendon and its corresponding group are summarized in Table 47.8.1.5 Upon completion of the liftoff, a visual verification is performed to identify any changes in the condition of the tendon end. No additional or broken wires were noted during or after liftoffs.I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: DOCUMENT TfTLE: PROJECT TITLE: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 37 FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30r" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION 30'" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I U bbEi(WiWt jRýTtC,4LS.'-'ýýS09.b;-"PAONiT'6'Fý IN 64E!Sle,6N(FbWý09+ý z I.-U 2I'U IA.u'0 0 4'a.~.j I IL id.j2 o zw za 40 0'TOP 14.75 161 8784 1559.95 12V01 1559.95 1525 1449 1372 NO 0 YES BOT 4.00 158 N/A NIA TOP 12.50 153 8780 1458.80 45V20 1456.80 1507 1432 1357 NO 0 YES BOT 4.00 163 N/A N/A TOP 13.00 163 8784 1505.98 61V08 150598 1491 1416 1342 NO 0 YES BOT 4.00 163 N/A NIA TOP 12.00 161 8784 1580,18 61V17 1580.18 1498 1423, 1348 NO 0 YES BOT 4.00 163 N/A N/A I IL ZL itA~I I* a Alti 4 BT,1 6.50 163 8784 1344.08 13H36 1385.23 1484 1410 1336 YES a NO BT 3 7,25 163 8780 1428.63 BT 2 5.75 163 8784 1546.46 42H46 1558.63 1458 1383 1310 NO 0 YES ST 4 6.00 163 8780 1570.80 BT 4 5.75 163 8780 1319.34 4GH21 1330.02 1441 1369 1297 YES 5 NO BT 6 6.00 163 8784 1340.71 8T 1 8.00 163 8784 1532.96 51H34 1464.70 1467 1413 1339 NO 0 YES ST 5 7.00 163 8780 1396.45 BT 2 6.75 163 8784 1249.64 62H30 1290.84 1413 1342 1272 YES 5 NO BT 6 6.75 163 9501 1332.05 DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002.504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 38 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 3 0'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'm YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124108 TA* 2 10ME --901 6 *OIOý]0if ON 0(RQ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I z w I-.X -%IL us d 4 AL 0 a SL 0.'AL U..0.L.10 it0 z0 IL-"I (J0 40'u Z Z 0.1-IL i "i673 ]625 I162 8.780 i1289.161 0129 B 3 I 1 1 1289.64 1287 1223' 1159 NO 0 YES OT 5 6.00 161 8784 1290.12 1 6 I 1 6.38 162 8784 1259.76 I 0 YES D212 12778.1 1305 1240 1175 NO 0 YES T t3 6.50 162 8780 1295.87 BT 4 7.00 163 8780 1527.21 238 1511.53 1348 1281 1213 NO 0 YES BT6 6.00 163 8784 1495.85-3H34 -3H6.61 147n -MON -ES -O 13H33 1306-46 1366 1298 1229 YES YES BT 3 6.75 163 8780 1323.57 BT 1 7.00 163 8784 1310.35 13H37 1309.48 1368 1298 1229 N YES N 67T3 6.75 163 8780 1302.057 ST11 7.00 163 8784 1350.83 1 3H34 1368.61 1475 1402 1328 YES NO IBT3 7.00 163 8780 1386.39 BT 1 6.56 163 8784 1249.64 13H35 1244.25 1373 1304 135 YES No ST 3 6.38 162 8780 1238.87 ST71 6.88 163 8784 1387.69 13H37 B3 57 16 1 s 11.511289.87 11388 1 1299 12311 YES No 61 1 6.60 163 8784 1411.54 13H438 BT3 70 6 70 17.7 1395.05 1444 1372 1300 NO YES L-- --- --m ------ -1 I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 39 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'" YEAR CONTAINMENT IWL INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE 30'M YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01/24108 1EE11:ifý mini lMNlTt'R1NGk K ~I E w l-W 2.l-C9I-wa>'a dc 412 CL it W6>.IL~0)1-0 z M'u N6 II' 9 -~ IN -pi- -I '9-I I BT 4 7.00 t 163 1 8780 1 1352.87 46H?'19 7 14.6T 6 7.50 163 8784 1364.35 1358.61 1 1402 1332 1262 1 NO.YES BT 4 6 75 160 8780 1269.04 46H20 T 1298.13 1467 1394 1321 YES NO BT 6 7-25 163 8784 1327.22 1 46H22 BT 4 BT 6 5.75 6.38 163 163 8780 8784 1315.98 1306.98 II I I I 1311.48 1488 1412 1337 I YES NO II I I I I I I I BT 4 6.00 161 8760 1338.10 46H23 1329 97 1425 1354 1283 YES NO SBT6 5.75 163 8784 1323.85 BT 4 6.75 163 8780 1419.92 46H24 1425.85 1472 1398 1325 NO YES BT 6 7.50 163 8784 1431.78 BT~~~~~ 2 6,5 13.8 290 62H23 1-69.3 14-1 1301 1 2-9 NO YE-BT 6" 6.00 163 N/A NIA ST 2 7.00 163 8780 1332.7,5 632H32 1332.75 1455 1382 `1310 YES NO BT6* 50 163 N/A NIA BT2 6519 163 8780 1242.22 62H33 1313.39 141 1388 1315 YES NO BT 6 6250 162 1784 1384-56 1 BT 2 7.00 163 8780 1393210 62H34 1378.71 1432 1360 1289 NO YES BT 6 6.75 162 8784 136432--I ------I- I* TENDON NOT ACCESSABLE AT BUTTRESS 6. I I I I I I I I I ,I I I I 1 I I I-I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 40 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'M YEAR CONTAINMENT IWl INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 3 0 T" YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE; 01/24/08"A F q ME E AýE;46: 4DJACENTS RESiTiEftTil AS-FOUND LIFTOFF RESTORATION 2 U'a z wl 06.j U.LL IL BT 1 8784 1350.83 8784 1479.00 13H34 1368.61 1508.13 1475 +2.2% YES BT 3 8780, 138839 8780 1537.27 ST 1 8784 1249.64 8784 1411.54 13H35 1244.25 1417.40 1373 +3.2% YES BT 3 8780 1238-87 8780 1423.27 BT 1 8784 1344.08 8784 1546.46 13H36 1385.23 1555.27 1484 .4.8% YES BT 3 8780 1426.63 8780 1564.09 BT 1 8784 1387.69 8784 1394.68 13H37 1289.87 1415.68 1368 +3.5% YES ST 3 8780 1212.05 8780 1436.69 BT 4 8780 1269.04 8780 1486.98 46H20 1298.13 1494.79 1467 *1.9% YES BT 6 8784 1327.22 8784 1502.61 BT 4 8780 1319.34 8780 1503.74 46H21 1330.02 1501.49 1441 *4.2% YES BT 6 8784 1340.71 8784 1499.24 BT 4 8780 1315.98 8780 1567.45 46H22 1311.48 1538.40 1486 *3.5% YES BT 6 8784 1306.98 8784 150935 BT 4 8780 1338.10 8780 1486.98 46H23 1329.07 1481.30 1425 -4.0% YES BT 6 8784 1323.85 8784 1475.62 ST 2 8784 1249.54 8780 1443.39 62H30 1290.84 1467.71 1413 +3.9% YES BT 6 9501 1332.05 9501 1492.04 BT 2 8780 1269.04 8780 1488.98 62H31 1269.04 1486.98 1475 40.8% YES BT6 NIA NIA NIA NIA BT 2 8780 1332.75 8780 149704 62H32 1332.75 1497.04 1455 +2.9% YES BT 6" N/A NA NIA N/A BT 2 8780 1242.22 8780 1488.98 62H33 1313.39 1494.79 1461 +2.3% YES 8784 1384.56 8784 1502.81* TENDON NOT ACCESSABLE AT BUTTRESS 6 -RESTORATION ONE END ONLY. I I I I I I I I I I I U I I I I I I I DOCUMENT NUMBER: CR-N1002-504 REVISION: 0 PAGE: 41 DOCUMENT TITLE: FINAL REPORT FOR THE 30'M YEAR CONTAINMENT IW. INSPECTION PROJECT TITLE: 30'M YEAR TENDON SURVEILLANCE AT CRYSTAL RIVER DATE: 01124/08 AT-iI AN q TENDON AALV (KIPS)NORMALIZING I NORMALIZED FACTOR AALV (KIPS)NORMALIZED GROUP AVE.MIMUM REQUIRED NORMALIZED FORCE ACCEPT.12V01 1559.95 -9 1550.95 45V20 1456.80 7 1463.80 1535,23 1149 YES 61V08 1505.98 23 1528.98 61V17 1580.18 17 1597.18 131433 130646 62 1388.46 131434 1388.61 -47 1321.61 131135 1244.25 58 1300,25 13H36 1385.23 .56 1329.23 131437 1289.87 61 1350.87 131138 1395.05 -17 1378.05 42H46 1558.63 -28 1530.63 46H19 1358.61 25 1383.61 46H20 1298.13 -39 1259.13 1347.38 1252. YES 46H21 133002 -12 1318.02 460122 1311.48 .57 1254.48 461123 1329.97 4 1333.97 46H24 1425.85 44 1381.85 51H34 1484.70 -59 140570 621129 1369.63 7 1376.63 62H30 1290.84 14 1304.84 62H33 1313.39 -32 1281.39 621H34 1378.71 -5 1373.71 D129 1289.64 34 1323.64 D212 1277.81 15 1292.81 136733 1215 YES D238 1511.53 -26 1485.53}}