05000321/LER-1979-103-03, /03L-0:on 791227,while Performing Surveillance on Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Sys Flow Instrument,High Switch Exceeded Tech Specs.Caused by Instrument Drift.Switch Was Recalibr & Surveillance Performed Satisfactorily

From kanterella
Revision as of 19:00, 3 January 2025 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
/03L-0:on 791227,while Performing Surveillance on Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Sys Flow Instrument,High Switch Exceeded Tech Specs.Caused by Instrument Drift.Switch Was Recalibr & Surveillance Performed Satisfactorily
ML19257B988
Person / Time
Site: Hatch 
Issue date: 01/17/1980
From: Nix R
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
Shared Package
ML19257B979 List:
References
LER-79-103-03L-01, LER-79-103-3L-1, NUDOCS 8001220503
Download: ML19257B988 (2)


LER-1979-103, /03L-0:on 791227,while Performing Surveillance on Reactor Core Isolation Cooling Sys Flow Instrument,High Switch Exceeded Tech Specs.Caused by Instrument Drift.Switch Was Recalibr & Surveillance Performed Satisfactorily
Event date:
Report date:
3211979103R03 - NRC Website

text

unc ponu seo 17 77)

LICENSEE EVENT REPORT ccNinOL etOcK: [

l l

l l U@

(PLE ASE PHIN r On TYPE ALL HEOUIRED INFORMATION) i e

f6Til I Cl Al El 11 HI 11@! o l o l ol o f 01 o aloIo o_Laj@l4 1l1l1l1l@l l

l@

7 8 9 LILENStE CODt 14 15 LILEN5L feG/dt H h

20 LIL ENSE 1) PE.

JU S1 ( AI 5d COTT 1 @l112121717l9l@ ol1l1l7l810l@

3[,$lL}@lolSl0]ol013 2

o i

1 8

60 61 DOCh E T NUP/dEH 68 69 EklM DATE 74 75 HEPORT DATE 80 EVENT DESCRIPTION AND PROBABLE CONSEQUENCES h l During cold shutdown and while performinn normal surveillance on the RCIC system flow I o 2 I o 13 J instrument, 1E51-N002. the high switch was found at 8.1 in. U20.

This exceeds Tech-l lo la 1 nical Specification Table 3.2-3, Item 6, which states that the high setpoint should j

H 0.

This is a repetitive occurrence as reported

[

loisI be greater than 80 gpm, 8.96 in.

7 r*.

Iolc] ! last on LER 50-321/1979-102. There was no effect on public health or safety.

l l

l0 l 7 l l 1

o s l 80 SYSTEM

CAUSE

C A USE COVP.

VALVE CCDE CODE SU8 CODE COMPONENT CODE SU8 CODE SUCCODE 10191 i Cl Ej@ W@ l C l@ l Z l Z l Z l Z l Z l Z l@ l Zl@ ]@

7 8

9 10 11 12 13 18 l '3 20 SE QU E N TI AL OCCUR A E NCE REPOHT REVISION

_ EVENT YEAR REPORT NO.

COCE TYPE N O.

@ n'g p go l217l9l l-l l1l0 3l W

l013 l l L]

[---j l0 l t

u[g 22 23 24 26 27 2H 29 30 31 32 TA Ef A T ON O PL AP T ETH5 HOURS S B 11 O

FO b ti SUPP' IE M

FA T REH I Al@lld@

l Z i@

LZJ@

l01010101 lY @

Lttl@

lNl@

lGl0l8l0l@

33 34 35 4

34 40 43 42 43 44 47 cAUSE DESCmPTION AND CORRECTIVE ACTIONS l The switch being out of tolerance was attributed to instrunept drift.

The witch I

i o

[i j i j was calibrated per HNP-1-5202, Barton Model 288A and 289A Dif ferential Indicatirm I

g, y l Switch, and the surveillance procedure, HNP-1-3404, RCIC System Flos Instrument l

Functional Test and Calibration was performed satisfactorily.

l i

3 1

11 141 1 80 7

8 9 ST T

% POWE R OTHER ST A TUS iSCOV PY DISCOVERY DESCLtiPTION NA l

lBl@l Surveillance Test l

[_gj@ l0 10lOl@l i s A TIVITY CC4 TENT RELEASED OF HELE ASE AVOUNT OF ACTIVITY LOC A TION OF RELE ASE NA I

I NA l

Ii Io I LZJ @ LZJ@l 7

8 9 10 11 44 45 80 PERSUNNEL TXPOsuRES NU MF-1 DESCHIPTION D li l il 10 l o l oj@l ZTYPE @l NA l

8o PERsONsn',N,L oESCRe noN@

Nu - H li 1 J 10 lo lo @l NA gg

/

tl 9 11 12 LOSS OF OH D AV AGE TO F ACILITY IZ181 NA

}JM

%3

_j TYPE D ESC R W T ION i,

80 7

8 9 10 NHC LEE ONLY issuF r'@OE sc R tP flON Lrtj l

NA i

i i i i i i iiii i ig 2 "

a m m;

i n 9 no 0

N AVE OF PREPARE

PHONE:

8 ()(s 3 o o

NARRATIVE

REPORT Georgia Power Company Plant E.

I. llatch Baxley, Georgia 31513 Reportable Occurrence Report No. 50-321/1979-103 During cold shutdawn and while perfonning normal surveillance on die RCIC System Flow Instrument, IE51-N002, the high switch was found at 8.1 in I

H20 This exceeds Technical Specifications Table ],2-3, Item 6, which states H 0.

This t

that the high setpoint should be greater than 80 gpm, 8.96 in.

2 is a repetitive occurrence.

l The switch was recalibrated per IINP-1-5202, Barton Model 288A and 289A Dif ferential Indicating Switch, and the surveillance procedure was performed satisfactorily.

The switch being out of tolerance was attributed to instrument drift.

This type of instrument is utilized in other systems on both units, but no generic problens have been discovered at this time.

Investigations will continue and a follow-up report will be subnitted.

l I

1783 354 f