ML062830433

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:43, 13 July 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Federal Register Notice for Nine Mile Point Nuclear, LLC Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station Units 1 and 2, Notice of Issuance of Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 for an Additional 20-Year Period
ML062830433
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/31/2006
From: Gillespie F
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR
To:
Le N. B., NRR/DLR/RLRB, 415-1458
Shared Package
ML062830299 List:
References
TAC MC3272, TAC MC3273
Download: ML062830433 (3)


Text

{{#Wiki_filter:7590-01-PUNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONNINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, LLCNINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2NOTICE OF ISSUANCE OF RENEWED FACILITYOPERATING LICENSE NOS. DPR-63 AND NPF-69FOR AN ADDITIONAL 20-YEAR PERIODRECORD OF DECISIONDOCKET NOS. 50-220 AND 50-410Notice is hereby given that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission)has issued Renewed Facility Operating Li cense Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 to the Nine MilePoint Nuclear Station, LLC (the licensee), the operator of the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station (NMP), Units 1 and 2. Renewed Facility Operating Li cense No. DPR-63 authorizes operation ofNMP, Unit 1, by the licensee at reactor core power levels not in excess of 1850 megawatts thermal, in accordance with the provisions of the NMP renewed license and its Technical Specifications. Renewed Facility Operating Li cense No. NPF-69 authorizes operation of NMP,Unit 2, by the licensee at reactor core power levels not in excess of 3467 megawatts thermal, in accordance with the provisions of the NMP renewed license and its Technical Specifications.This notice also serves as the record of decision for the renewal of Facility OperatingLicense Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 for NMP, Units 1 and 2. As discussed in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (FSEIS) for NMP, dated May 2006, the Commission considered a range of reasonable alternatives that included generation from coal, natural gas, oil, wind, solar, hydropower, geothermal, wood waste, municipal solid waste, other biomass-derived fuels, delayed retirement, utility-sponsored conservation, a combination ofalternatives, and a no-action alternative. This range of alternatives was discussed in the Generic Environmental Impact Statement for License Renewal, Supplement 24 regarding NineMile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2.After weighing the environment al, economic, technical and other benefits of the facilityagainst environmental costs and considering available alternatives, the Commission found that the adverse environmental impacts of license renewal are not so great that preserving the option of license renewal would be unreasonable. The Commission also has taken all practicable measures within its jurisdiction to avoid or minimize environmental harm in its decision to renew Operating License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69. No license conditions are imposed in connection with mitigation measures.NMP, Units 1 and 2, are located on approximately 900 acres along the shore of LakeOntario, Oswego County, New York. The site is approximately 5 miles north-northeast of the nearest boundary of the City of Oswego. The licensee =s application for the renewed licensescomplied with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended(the Act), and the Commission =s regulations. As required by the Act and the Commission =sregulations in 10 CFR Chapter I, the Commission has made appropriate findings, which are setforth in each license. Prior public notice of the action involving the proposed issuance of the renewed licensesand of an opportunity for a hearing regarding the proposed issuance of the renewed licenses was published in the Federal Register on July 21, 2004 (69 FR 43633).For further details with respect to this action, see (1) the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC license renewal application for Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2 dated May 26, 2004, as amended July 15, 2005; (2) the Commission =s safety evaluation report (NUREG-1900), published in September 2006; and (3) the Commission =s final environmental impact statement (NUREG-1437, Supplement 24), published in May 2006. These documentsare available at the NRC Public Document Room, One White Flint North, 11555 Rockville Pike,Rockville, Maryland 20852, and can be viewed from the NRC Pub lic Electronic Reading Roomat (http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html). Copies of Renewed Facility Operating License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 may beobtained by writing to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC, 20555-0001, Attention: Director, Division of License Renewal. Copies of the NMP, Units 1 and 2, Safety Evaluation Report (NUREG-1900) and the Final Environmental Impact Statement (NUREG-1437, Supplement 24) may be purchased from the National Technical Information Service, U.S. Department of Commerce, Springfield, VA 22161-0002 (http://www.ntis.gov ), 703-605-6000, or the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office, P.O. Box 371954, Pittsburgh, PA, 15250-7954. (http://www.gpoaccess.gov), 202-512-1800. Allorders should clearly identify the NRC publication number and the requester =s GovernmentPrinting Office deposit account number or a VISA or MasterCard number and expiration date.Dated at Rockville, Maryland, this 31 st day of October, 2006. FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/ Frank P. Gillespie, Director Division of License Renewal Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation}}