ML11263A124

From kanterella
Revision as of 02:41, 3 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-mail from M. Wentzel, NRR to D. Doyle, NRR Et Al, on Salem/Hope Creek Hydro Comments
ML11263A124
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 02/10/2011
From: Wentzel M J
Division of License Renewal
To: Beissel D R, Doyle D I
Division of License Renewal
References
FOIA/PA-2011-0113
Download: ML11263A124 (2)


Text

Wentzel, Michael From: Wentzel, Michael Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:15 PM To: Beissel, Dennis; Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy: Perkins, Leslie

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Leslie mentioned that the applicant was working on addressing ER comments, so I think there is a pretty good chance that there are going to be responses.

From: Beissel, Dennis Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2011 2:10 PM To: Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy; Wentzel, Michael; Perkins, Leslie

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments I have marked up the document where appropriate based on the comments.

Is the applicant going to-respond to the ER comments?

If they make changes, it could alter our responses.

From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011 10:07 AM To: Beissel, Dennis Cc: Imboden, Andy; Wentzel, Michael; Perkins, Leslie

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dennis, Mike Wentzel is pulling together the comment responses on the Salem Hope Creek DSEIS so please send him your draft responses as soon as you can. Thanks, Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.doyle(,n rc.,qov (301) 415-3748 From: Beissel, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:34 PM To: Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Hi Dan, I will do the response to comments for SHP, but I don't think they can be done by next Thursday Feb 3. A more realistic date considering my current workload is COB Feb 1 5"h. I discussed this with Andy and he agrees with my assessment.

Of course, I will try to finish these sooner. Thanks, Dennis From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:14 PM To: Beissel, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie

Subject:

Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments 1 Dennis, Please take a look at the attached hydro comments for the Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS.They are mostly from the state of NJ Dept of Environmental Protection.

Note that comments SHC-W-21 through SHC-W-28 (from the New Jersey Geological Survey) are actually about the applicant's ER, not the DSEIS.I attached the comment letter from NJ so you can take a look at that... the comments from the NJ Geological people are on pp 6-8 of the pdf.I would like to receive your responses by next Thursday (Feb 3).FYI: Salem ER: http://www.nrc.qov/reactors/operatinq/licensinq/renewal/applications/salem/salem-envir-rpt.pdf Hope Creek ER: http://www.nrc.qov/reactors/operatinq/licensinq/renewal/applications/hope-creek/hope-creek-envir-rpt.

pdf Thanks, Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.doylecnrc..ov (301) 415-3748 2