ML20082G190

From kanterella
Revision as of 10:39, 26 September 2022 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Np Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation.Expresses Concern Over Lack of Communication Between NRC & Licensee When Employer Not Notified
ML20082G190
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 04/11/1995
From: Fitzpatrick E
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
FRN-60FR7592, RULE-PR-MISC 60FR7592-00013, 60FR7592-13, NUDOCS 9504130134
Download: ML20082G190 (2)


Text

inniana Ectugan

, Power Company P.O Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 00CKUED sums US"Rr gg INDCANA n90CN0GAN 95 APR 11 P3 :50 Powra l

OfTiC. ~ i n '- l DOCM .r p

AEP:NRC:0508AL Docket Nos.: 50-315 -

50-316 DOCKET NUMBERnD U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission PROPOSED RULE ra mm _

ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 l

Gentlemen:

Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 COMMENTS ON THE DRAFT POLICY STATEMENT

" FREEDOM OF EMPLOYEES IN THE NUCLEAR INDUSTRY TO RAISE CONCERNS WITHOUT FEAR OF RETALIATION" (60 h REG. 7592, FEBRUARY 8, 1995)

We appreciate the opportunity to comment on the subject draft policy. We generally support the Nuclear Energy Institute's (NEI) position as stated in NEI's April 10, 1995, letter regarding this subject.

One of our specific concerns is the potential lack of communication between the NRC and the licensee where the employee has informed the NRC, but not the employer, on matters that could bear on the public, including worker, health and safety. The NRC should inform i the utility when an individual has in fact registered a concern l directly to the NRC without first having brought the matter to the I employer's attention. This situation could result in a public safety and health matter being unresolved for an extended period while the NRC proceeds with an investigation to determine if the utility / employer has engaged in a " wrongdoing."

Sincerely,

~

~

E. E. Fitzpatrick Vice President eh 9504130134 950411 PDR H ADOCK 05000315 PDR p

ap.

l t

l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP:NRC:050BAL Page 2 i

i cc:

A. A. Blind

, G. Charnoff

, J. B. Martin i NFEM Section Chief j

~

NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman J. R. Padgett 4

4 s

4 i*

t i

k I

j c

l l

I

_ _ . - _ _ ,_. _. _ _ __ . . . _ , _