Similar Documents at Cook |
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML17334B6591997-10-0909 October 1997
Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting That OLs Be Modified, Revoked or Suspended Until Reasonable Assurance That Sys in Conformance W/Design & Licensing Bases Requirements
ML20148U4501997-07-0303 July 1997
Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed RG Re to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments)
ML20141E0861997-06-27027 June 1997
Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately).Orders That Lr Wilson Prohibited from Engaging in Activities Licensed by NRC for 5 Yrs from Date of Order
ML17333A9201997-06-18018 June 1997
Comment on Draft NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems
ML20097F8161996-02-0909 February 1996
Comment Opposing PRM 50-63 Re Use of Ki as Protective Action for Emergency Workers & Public.Protests Significant Costs & Suggests Potential Benefits Unclear
ML17333A2151995-12-11011 December 1995
Comment Supporting Draft GL 83-11,Suppl 1 Providing Guidelines to Licensees Who Wish to Perform Their Own Safety & Reactor Core Design Analyses.Eliminates Need to Submit Detailed Topical Reports & Will Save Limited NRC Resources
ML17332A9211995-08-14014 August 1995
Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exam.
ML20087D5111995-08-0101 August 1995
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs
ML20087D5401995-08-0101 August 1995
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs
ML20087C2101995-07-10010 July 1995
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial
ML20083K0341995-05-0101 May 1995
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors. Endorses NEI Comments
ML20082G1901995-04-11011 April 1995
Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Np Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation.Expresses Concern Over Lack of Communication Between NRC & Licensee When Employer Not Notified
ML20072K3201994-08-0505 August 1994
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to Fitness for Duty Requirements.Recommends That Present Scope of Coverage & Detail of Random Testing Requirements Be Retained
ML17331B0071993-09-29029 September 1993
Comments Supporting NUMARC Opinions Re Whistleblowers Protection
ML17331A9411993-08-16016 August 1993
Submits Comments on Draft NUREG-1477, Voltage-Based Interim Plugging Criteria for SG Tubes-Task Group Rept. NUREG Recommendations Do Not Take Into Consideration Plants That Are Operating W/Interim Plugging Criteria
ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning
ML20045D7381993-06-22022 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Opposes Rule
ML20044E1441993-05-0303 May 1993
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Required Emergency Planning from Annual to Biennial
ML20101P4461992-06-26026 June 1992
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl
ML17328A4921990-09-27027 September 1990
Affidavit of SA Toelle Requesting That Summary Rept TR-MCC-153, C-E Steam Generator Tube Sleeve Residual Stress Evaluation Be Treated as Proprietary
ML19332F2021989-12-0101 December 1989
Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. More Flexibility Should Be Provided in Guidelines for Organizations
ML20235T2381989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degreed Status for Senior Operating License Holders.Proposal Both Unneeded,Unwarranted & Issue Should Be Put to Rest.Pursuit of Proposal Will Deter Valuable Employees from Industry
ML20235N7281989-02-17017 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Shares Commissioner Robert Concerns on Existence of Rule
ML20235P4031989-02-0909 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rules Provide Needless Demoralizing Effect on Reactor Operators
ML20155A0291988-09-30030 September 1988
Temporary Exemption from Requirements of Property Insurance Rule,Effective 881004
ML20151M3901988-07-29029 July 1988
Comment Endorsing Comments Submitted by Shaw,Pittman,Potts & Trowbridge Re Fee Schedules for Licensees.Amount of NRC Attention Received by Plant Largely Outside Plant Control, Thus Making Form of Billing in Rule Randomly Unfair
ML20136D8251985-11-20020 November 1985
Memorandum & Order Granting Util 850917 Request for Extension of 851130 Deadline for Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment,Until Planned Feb 1986 Refueling Outage.Served on 851120
ML20138M8711985-10-25025 October 1985
Transcript of 851025 Meeting in Washington,Dc Re Util Requests for Exemption from Environ Qualification.Pp 1-76
ML17317A9141979-01-26026 January 1979
Forwards Endorsements 29 & 30 to Maelu Policy MF-79 & Endorsements 36 & 37 to ANI Policy NF-206
1997-07-03
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20148U4501997-07-0303 July 1997
Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed RG Re to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments)
ML17333A9201997-06-18018 June 1997
Comment on Draft NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems
ML20097F8161996-02-0909 February 1996
Comment Opposing PRM 50-63 Re Use of Ki as Protective Action for Emergency Workers & Public.Protests Significant Costs & Suggests Potential Benefits Unclear
ML17333A2151995-12-11011 December 1995
Comment Supporting Draft GL 83-11,Suppl 1 Providing Guidelines to Licensees Who Wish to Perform Their Own Safety & Reactor Core Design Analyses.Eliminates Need to Submit Detailed Topical Reports & Will Save Limited NRC Resources
ML17332A9211995-08-14014 August 1995
Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exam.
ML20087D5111995-08-0101 August 1995
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs
ML20087D5401995-08-0101 August 1995
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs
ML20087C2101995-07-10010 July 1995
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial
ML20083K0341995-05-0101 May 1995
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors. Endorses NEI Comments
ML20082G1901995-04-11011 April 1995
Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Np Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation.Expresses Concern Over Lack of Communication Between NRC & Licensee When Employer Not Notified
ML20072K3201994-08-0505 August 1994
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to Fitness for Duty Requirements.Recommends That Present Scope of Coverage & Detail of Random Testing Requirements Be Retained
ML17331B0071993-09-29029 September 1993
Comments Supporting NUMARC Opinions Re Whistleblowers Protection
ML17331A9411993-08-16016 August 1993
Submits Comments on Draft NUREG-1477, Voltage-Based Interim Plugging Criteria for SG Tubes-Task Group Rept. NUREG Recommendations Do Not Take Into Consideration Plants That Are Operating W/Interim Plugging Criteria
ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning
ML20045D7381993-06-22022 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Opposes Rule
ML20044E1441993-05-0303 May 1993
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Required Emergency Planning from Annual to Biennial
ML20101P4461992-06-26026 June 1992
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl
ML19332F2021989-12-0101 December 1989
Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. More Flexibility Should Be Provided in Guidelines for Organizations
ML20235T2381989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degreed Status for Senior Operating License Holders.Proposal Both Unneeded,Unwarranted & Issue Should Be Put to Rest.Pursuit of Proposal Will Deter Valuable Employees from Industry
ML20235N7281989-02-17017 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Shares Commissioner Robert Concerns on Existence of Rule
ML20235P4031989-02-0909 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rules Provide Needless Demoralizing Effect on Reactor Operators
ML20151M3901988-07-29029 July 1988
Comment Endorsing Comments Submitted by Shaw,Pittman,Potts & Trowbridge Re Fee Schedules for Licensees.Amount of NRC Attention Received by Plant Largely Outside Plant Control, Thus Making Form of Billing in Rule Randomly Unfair
1997-07-03
[Table view] |
Text
,g indiana Michigan Po2er Company P O Box 16631 Columtms OH 43216 00CKEIED USNRC g 73 INDIANA 94 AUG 17 P137 MICHIGAN POWER OFFICE OF SECRETARY DCCKETihG e SEF lice bR ANC'i AEP:NRC:0508AF Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 DOCKET NUMBER License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 PROPOSED RULE N N PROPOSED RULE CHANCES TO FITNESS FOR DUTY (FFD)
REQUIREMENTS pg gg Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Attn: Docketing and Services Branch August 5, 1994
Dear Mr. Secretary:
Volume 59, No. 90 of the Federal Register includes proposed rule changes to 10CFR Part 26 FFD requirements. The following are our comments regarding the proposed rulemaking and changes to 10CFR Part 26.
We recommend that the present scope of coverage and detail of the random testing requirements be retained. The current program provides consistent requirements for all personnel within the Plant regardless of their job responsibilities. Although cost savings may be realized by removing certain groups of workers from FFD (i.e., based on access to protected or vital areas or position descriptions), the maintenance of the random test pool would become administrative 1y more burdensome. Also, the possibility of inadvertently not including personnel in the pool would increase due to the ever-changing status of personnel. The reduction from 100% to 50% population random test requirement has significantly reduced the cost of the testing program and further reduction may impact upon assuring a drug free work environment.
9408300010 940805 PDR PR 26 59FR24373 PDR OP0
. 5 I
Mr. Secretary AEP:NRC:0508AF We further recommend that the present method of testing (i.e. , urinalysis) be continued due to worker acceptability as well as the well-documented accuracy of results since the implementation of the FFD rule on January 3, 1990. Although the proposed performance-based testing has a sensitivity to impairment, it would not determine that an individual was impaired due to substance abuse nor would it detect illicit substance abuse if there was no observed impairment.
Sincerely, 0/
Arf E . E . Fitzpatrick Vice President cc: A. A. Blind - Bridgman G. Charnoff J. B. Martin - Region III ,
NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman NFEM Section Chief J. R. Padgett l
i e
i I
,
