Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. More Flexibility Should Be Provided in Guidelines for OrganizationsML19332F202 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Cook ![American Electric Power icon.png](/w/images/3/39/American_Electric_Power_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
12/01/1989 |
---|
From: |
Alexich M INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
---|
To: |
NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
---|
References |
---|
FRN-54FR33983, RTR-REGGD-01.XXX, RTR-REGGD-1.XXX, TASK-DG1001, TASK-RE 54FR33983-00020, 54FR33983-20, AEP:NRC:0508I, AEP:NRC:508I, NUDOCS 8912140031 |
Download: ML19332F202 (2) |
|
Similar Documents at Cook |
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML17334B6591997-10-0909 October 1997 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting That OLs Be Modified, Revoked or Suspended Until Reasonable Assurance That Sys in Conformance W/Design & Licensing Bases Requirements ML20148U4501997-07-0303 July 1997 Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed RG Re to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments) ML20141E0861997-06-27027 June 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately).Orders That Lr Wilson Prohibited from Engaging in Activities Licensed by NRC for 5 Yrs from Date of Order ML17333A9201997-06-18018 June 1997 Comment on Draft NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20097F8161996-02-0909 February 1996 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63 Re Use of Ki as Protective Action for Emergency Workers & Public.Protests Significant Costs & Suggests Potential Benefits Unclear ML17333A2151995-12-11011 December 1995 Comment Supporting Draft GL 83-11,Suppl 1 Providing Guidelines to Licensees Who Wish to Perform Their Own Safety & Reactor Core Design Analyses.Eliminates Need to Submit Detailed Topical Reports & Will Save Limited NRC Resources ML17332A9211995-08-14014 August 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exam. ML20087D5111995-08-0101 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087D5401995-08-0101 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087C2101995-07-10010 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial ML20083K0341995-05-0101 May 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors. Endorses NEI Comments ML20082G1901995-04-11011 April 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Np Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation.Expresses Concern Over Lack of Communication Between NRC & Licensee When Employer Not Notified ML20072K3201994-08-0505 August 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to Fitness for Duty Requirements.Recommends That Present Scope of Coverage & Detail of Random Testing Requirements Be Retained ML17331B0071993-09-29029 September 1993 Comments Supporting NUMARC Opinions Re Whistleblowers Protection ML17331A9411993-08-16016 August 1993 Submits Comments on Draft NUREG-1477, Voltage-Based Interim Plugging Criteria for SG Tubes-Task Group Rept. NUREG Recommendations Do Not Take Into Consideration Plants That Are Operating W/Interim Plugging Criteria ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning ML20045D7381993-06-22022 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Opposes Rule ML20044E1441993-05-0303 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Required Emergency Planning from Annual to Biennial ML20101P4461992-06-26026 June 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl ML17328A4921990-09-27027 September 1990 Affidavit of SA Toelle Requesting That Summary Rept TR-MCC-153, C-E Steam Generator Tube Sleeve Residual Stress Evaluation Be Treated as Proprietary ML19332F2021989-12-0101 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. More Flexibility Should Be Provided in Guidelines for Organizations ML20235T2381989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degreed Status for Senior Operating License Holders.Proposal Both Unneeded,Unwarranted & Issue Should Be Put to Rest.Pursuit of Proposal Will Deter Valuable Employees from Industry ML20235N7281989-02-17017 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Shares Commissioner Robert Concerns on Existence of Rule ML20235P4031989-02-0909 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rules Provide Needless Demoralizing Effect on Reactor Operators ML20155A0291988-09-30030 September 1988 Temporary Exemption from Requirements of Property Insurance Rule,Effective 881004 ML20151M3901988-07-29029 July 1988 Comment Endorsing Comments Submitted by Shaw,Pittman,Potts & Trowbridge Re Fee Schedules for Licensees.Amount of NRC Attention Received by Plant Largely Outside Plant Control, Thus Making Form of Billing in Rule Randomly Unfair ML20136D8251985-11-20020 November 1985 Memorandum & Order Granting Util 850917 Request for Extension of 851130 Deadline for Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment,Until Planned Feb 1986 Refueling Outage.Served on 851120 ML20138M8711985-10-25025 October 1985 Transcript of 851025 Meeting in Washington,Dc Re Util Requests for Exemption from Environ Qualification.Pp 1-76 ML17317A9141979-01-26026 January 1979 Forwards Endorsements 29 & 30 to Maelu Policy MF-79 & Endorsements 36 & 37 to ANI Policy NF-206 1997-07-03
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20148U4501997-07-0303 July 1997 Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed RG Re to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments) ML17333A9201997-06-18018 June 1997 Comment on Draft NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20097F8161996-02-0909 February 1996 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63 Re Use of Ki as Protective Action for Emergency Workers & Public.Protests Significant Costs & Suggests Potential Benefits Unclear ML17333A2151995-12-11011 December 1995 Comment Supporting Draft GL 83-11,Suppl 1 Providing Guidelines to Licensees Who Wish to Perform Their Own Safety & Reactor Core Design Analyses.Eliminates Need to Submit Detailed Topical Reports & Will Save Limited NRC Resources ML17332A9211995-08-14014 August 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exam. ML20087D5111995-08-0101 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087D5401995-08-0101 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087C2101995-07-10010 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial ML20083K0341995-05-0101 May 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors. Endorses NEI Comments ML20082G1901995-04-11011 April 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Np Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation.Expresses Concern Over Lack of Communication Between NRC & Licensee When Employer Not Notified ML20072K3201994-08-0505 August 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to Fitness for Duty Requirements.Recommends That Present Scope of Coverage & Detail of Random Testing Requirements Be Retained ML17331B0071993-09-29029 September 1993 Comments Supporting NUMARC Opinions Re Whistleblowers Protection ML17331A9411993-08-16016 August 1993 Submits Comments on Draft NUREG-1477, Voltage-Based Interim Plugging Criteria for SG Tubes-Task Group Rept. NUREG Recommendations Do Not Take Into Consideration Plants That Are Operating W/Interim Plugging Criteria ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning ML20045D7381993-06-22022 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Opposes Rule ML20044E1441993-05-0303 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Required Emergency Planning from Annual to Biennial ML20101P4461992-06-26026 June 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl ML19332F2021989-12-0101 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. More Flexibility Should Be Provided in Guidelines for Organizations ML20235T2381989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degreed Status for Senior Operating License Holders.Proposal Both Unneeded,Unwarranted & Issue Should Be Put to Rest.Pursuit of Proposal Will Deter Valuable Employees from Industry ML20235N7281989-02-17017 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Shares Commissioner Robert Concerns on Existence of Rule ML20235P4031989-02-0909 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rules Provide Needless Demoralizing Effect on Reactor Operators ML20151M3901988-07-29029 July 1988 Comment Endorsing Comments Submitted by Shaw,Pittman,Potts & Trowbridge Re Fee Schedules for Licensees.Amount of NRC Attention Received by Plant Largely Outside Plant Control, Thus Making Form of Billing in Rule Randomly Unfair 1997-07-03
[Table view] |
Text
,
,l,o - , Indiana Michign Power Company g
c A. 3 L
.J r P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216
~ ~
' \yQ(([h - -
- n. . . -
DNDIANA ASDCHtGAN
. . -l n ; .\ /
POWER 1 i
AEP:NRC:0508I Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-315 and 50-316 I License Nos. DPR-58 and DPR-74 ,
COMMENTS ON DRAFT REGULATORY GUIDE " MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS ..
I FOR NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS" Regulatory Publications Branch e of Administration M I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.'20555 Oh 1
(
December 1,~1989 l
.l l
Dear Sir or Madam:
The NRG issued draft Regulatory Guide DG-1001, " Maintenance Programs '
for Nuclear Power Plants," for comment via a letter dated August 1, 1989. We are pleased to provide comments on the draft Regulatory Guide as follows:
l l: o More flexibility should be provided in guidelines for organizations, aside from plant-site organizations, to control and oversee the various aspects of a maintenance program, ranging from communications to control of vendors.
Present wording of the Regulatory Guide would only permit plant staff to serve the controlling function.
o It is not clear what role Individual Plant Examination (IPE), required under Generic Letter 88-20, will have in defining the scope or performance objectives of maintenance programs under the guidance provided in this Regulatory Guide. If the NRC desires a workable interface between these programs, pertinent guidance should be provided within this Regulatory Guide, o It is recommended that the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) Guideline 85-038, " Guidelines for the Conduct of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Stations,"
definitions for types of maintenance be used in the Regulatory Guide section on " Types of Maintenance" (Section 4.6). All nuclear plants in the United States were required to complete a maintenance self-assessment based on this guideline. Using INPO definitions would provide consistency in this area.
8912140031 891201 PDR REQQD PDR 01.XXX C
7~ ,
, 'N ' .a k
AEP:NRC:0508I Page 2-It-should be noted that, in addition to our own comments shown above, we adopt and support' comments provided to the NRC by the Nuclear
. Management and Resources Council (NUMARC). However, we would like to proceed one step further and indicate those NUMARC comments of particular importance to us as follows:
o Training and personnel-qualification guidelines should not be applied unilaterally to contractor personnel. Their training and qualification criteria should instead be based on the work they are to perform, and not necessarily meet all the criteria for unsupervised station personnel, o Something less subjective than the " level of performance consistent with that achieved by the top-performing U.S.
plants of similar design" should be used as a performance goal for the maintenance program. Instead, goals should be
-established based on excellence in achieving safe and reliable plant operations rather than on another plant's performance, o Throughout the Regulatory Guide subjective words and terms l are used that are open to varying interpretations. For l example, " Proper control of tools...," "... sound human l factors principles," and "... effective planning...." We recommend these words be omitted or clarified to avoid problems of interpretation, o Radiological exposure control and practices followed during l maintenance and other activities.are defined in the appropriate plant ALARA program. There is no need to define specific radiological controls in a maintenance Regulatory Guide.
Sincerely, ,
t M. . Alexidh Vice President idp
. . . - . . . - . .