Similar Documents at Cook |
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML17334B6591997-10-0909 October 1997 Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting That OLs Be Modified, Revoked or Suspended Until Reasonable Assurance That Sys in Conformance W/Design & Licensing Bases Requirements ML20148U4501997-07-0303 July 1997 Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed RG Re to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments) ML20141E0861997-06-27027 June 1997 Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately).Orders That Lr Wilson Prohibited from Engaging in Activities Licensed by NRC for 5 Yrs from Date of Order ML17333A9201997-06-18018 June 1997 Comment on Draft NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20097F8161996-02-0909 February 1996 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63 Re Use of Ki as Protective Action for Emergency Workers & Public.Protests Significant Costs & Suggests Potential Benefits Unclear ML17333A2151995-12-11011 December 1995 Comment Supporting Draft GL 83-11,Suppl 1 Providing Guidelines to Licensees Who Wish to Perform Their Own Safety & Reactor Core Design Analyses.Eliminates Need to Submit Detailed Topical Reports & Will Save Limited NRC Resources ML17332A9211995-08-14014 August 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exam. ML20087D5111995-08-0101 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087D5401995-08-0101 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087C2101995-07-10010 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial ML20083K0341995-05-0101 May 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors. Endorses NEI Comments ML20082G1901995-04-11011 April 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Np Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation.Expresses Concern Over Lack of Communication Between NRC & Licensee When Employer Not Notified ML20072K3201994-08-0505 August 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to Fitness for Duty Requirements.Recommends That Present Scope of Coverage & Detail of Random Testing Requirements Be Retained ML17331B0071993-09-29029 September 1993 Comments Supporting NUMARC Opinions Re Whistleblowers Protection ML17331A9411993-08-16016 August 1993 Submits Comments on Draft NUREG-1477, Voltage-Based Interim Plugging Criteria for SG Tubes-Task Group Rept. NUREG Recommendations Do Not Take Into Consideration Plants That Are Operating W/Interim Plugging Criteria ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning ML20045D7381993-06-22022 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Opposes Rule ML20044E1441993-05-0303 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Required Emergency Planning from Annual to Biennial ML20101P4461992-06-26026 June 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl ML17328A4921990-09-27027 September 1990 Affidavit of SA Toelle Requesting That Summary Rept TR-MCC-153, C-E Steam Generator Tube Sleeve Residual Stress Evaluation Be Treated as Proprietary ML19332F2021989-12-0101 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. More Flexibility Should Be Provided in Guidelines for Organizations ML20235T2381989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degreed Status for Senior Operating License Holders.Proposal Both Unneeded,Unwarranted & Issue Should Be Put to Rest.Pursuit of Proposal Will Deter Valuable Employees from Industry ML20235N7281989-02-17017 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Shares Commissioner Robert Concerns on Existence of Rule ML20235P4031989-02-0909 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rules Provide Needless Demoralizing Effect on Reactor Operators ML20155A0291988-09-30030 September 1988 Temporary Exemption from Requirements of Property Insurance Rule,Effective 881004 ML20151M3901988-07-29029 July 1988 Comment Endorsing Comments Submitted by Shaw,Pittman,Potts & Trowbridge Re Fee Schedules for Licensees.Amount of NRC Attention Received by Plant Largely Outside Plant Control, Thus Making Form of Billing in Rule Randomly Unfair ML20136D8251985-11-20020 November 1985 Memorandum & Order Granting Util 850917 Request for Extension of 851130 Deadline for Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment,Until Planned Feb 1986 Refueling Outage.Served on 851120 ML20138M8711985-10-25025 October 1985 Transcript of 851025 Meeting in Washington,Dc Re Util Requests for Exemption from Environ Qualification.Pp 1-76 ML17317A9141979-01-26026 January 1979 Forwards Endorsements 29 & 30 to Maelu Policy MF-79 & Endorsements 36 & 37 to ANI Policy NF-206 1997-07-03
[Table view] Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20148U4501997-07-0303 July 1997 Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed RG Re to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments) ML17333A9201997-06-18018 June 1997 Comment on Draft NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems ML20097F8161996-02-0909 February 1996 Comment Opposing PRM 50-63 Re Use of Ki as Protective Action for Emergency Workers & Public.Protests Significant Costs & Suggests Potential Benefits Unclear ML17333A2151995-12-11011 December 1995 Comment Supporting Draft GL 83-11,Suppl 1 Providing Guidelines to Licensees Who Wish to Perform Their Own Safety & Reactor Core Design Analyses.Eliminates Need to Submit Detailed Topical Reports & Will Save Limited NRC Resources ML17332A9211995-08-14014 August 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exam. ML20087D5111995-08-0101 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087D5401995-08-0101 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs ML20087C2101995-07-10010 July 1995 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial ML20083K0341995-05-0101 May 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors. Endorses NEI Comments ML20082G1901995-04-11011 April 1995 Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Np Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation.Expresses Concern Over Lack of Communication Between NRC & Licensee When Employer Not Notified ML20072K3201994-08-0505 August 1994 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to Fitness for Duty Requirements.Recommends That Present Scope of Coverage & Detail of Random Testing Requirements Be Retained ML17331B0071993-09-29029 September 1993 Comments Supporting NUMARC Opinions Re Whistleblowers Protection ML17331A9411993-08-16016 August 1993 Submits Comments on Draft NUREG-1477, Voltage-Based Interim Plugging Criteria for SG Tubes-Task Group Rept. NUREG Recommendations Do Not Take Into Consideration Plants That Are Operating W/Interim Plugging Criteria ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning ML20045D7381993-06-22022 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Opposes Rule ML20044E1441993-05-0303 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Required Emergency Planning from Annual to Biennial ML20101P4461992-06-26026 June 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl ML19332F2021989-12-0101 December 1989 Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. More Flexibility Should Be Provided in Guidelines for Organizations ML20235T2381989-02-27027 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degreed Status for Senior Operating License Holders.Proposal Both Unneeded,Unwarranted & Issue Should Be Put to Rest.Pursuit of Proposal Will Deter Valuable Employees from Industry ML20235N7281989-02-17017 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Shares Commissioner Robert Concerns on Existence of Rule ML20235P4031989-02-0909 February 1989 Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rules Provide Needless Demoralizing Effect on Reactor Operators ML20151M3901988-07-29029 July 1988 Comment Endorsing Comments Submitted by Shaw,Pittman,Potts & Trowbridge Re Fee Schedules for Licensees.Amount of NRC Attention Received by Plant Largely Outside Plant Control, Thus Making Form of Billing in Rule Randomly Unfair 1997-07-03
[Table view] |
Text
Indiana Michigan Power Congany DOCKU M M 4 gj l$
f o Bo au ca1e ws Ph. MD RULE g g ,O ) f1 y
ir
. m. . s iff"
- mme INDIANA ANCNDOAN
'88 Jll. 29 A10:23 Powra fo h as . \ :a < st Secretary of the U.S. Nuclear RegulatsbyTommission Washington, D.C. 20555 Attention: Docketing and Service Branch
Dear Sir or Madam:
- This letter is in response to the proposed rule concerning revision of the fee schedules in 10 CFR Parts 170 and 171, published in the Federal Register (53 FR 24077). We concur with the comments submitted by Jay E. Silberg of the law firm of Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge, except as set forth below.
Indian Michigan Power Company, owner and operator of the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, objects in general to the annual fee.
However, if these fees are to be raised, we propose that the
, "second" option, described on page 24079 of the reference Federal Register notice, be adopted. That option states, the commission at this time would not adopt any changes to'Part 170 or Part 171 other than to raise the annual fen so that the amount of fee collected by the Commission under 10 CFR 171.15, when added to fees that would be collected under 10 CFR 170 as currently codified, would approximate, but not be less than 45 percent of the NRC budget.
The proposed legislation (firs': option) calls for co11reting the annual fee increase in part by removing the fee ceilinga for reactor and major fuel cycle permits, licenses, amendments, and inspections, asserting that this would allow major users of NRC q services to pay a larger share of the bill. However, an individual utility has only limited control over the allocation of NRC resources, and thus, a disproportionate burden could be placed on one utility and its ratepayers. The amount of NRC l attention received by a plant is largely outside of the plant's control, thus making the form of billing described in the
{ proposed rule randomly unfair. The option described above is, l
in our opinion, a more acceptable method of collecting the annual fee.
Sincerely yours, Mi ton P. Alexich
, Vice President 4
00000D0141 000729 pf / C)
PDR PR ,
170 D3FH24077 PDR i
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _______________- _ __ - __ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ - _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _