Similar Documents at Cook |
|---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML17334B6591997-10-0909 October 1997
Petition Per 10CFR2.206 Requesting That OLs Be Modified, Revoked or Suspended Until Reasonable Assurance That Sys in Conformance W/Design & Licensing Bases Requirements
ML20148U4501997-07-0303 July 1997
Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed RG Re to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments)
ML20141E0861997-06-27027 June 1997
Order Prohibiting Involvement in NRC Licensed Activities (Effective Immediately).Orders That Lr Wilson Prohibited from Engaging in Activities Licensed by NRC for 5 Yrs from Date of Order
ML17333A9201997-06-18018 June 1997
Comment on Draft NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems
ML20097F8161996-02-0909 February 1996
Comment Opposing PRM 50-63 Re Use of Ki as Protective Action for Emergency Workers & Public.Protests Significant Costs & Suggests Potential Benefits Unclear
ML17333A2151995-12-11011 December 1995
Comment Supporting Draft GL 83-11,Suppl 1 Providing Guidelines to Licensees Who Wish to Perform Their Own Safety & Reactor Core Design Analyses.Eliminates Need to Submit Detailed Topical Reports & Will Save Limited NRC Resources
ML17332A9211995-08-14014 August 1995
Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exam.
ML20087D5111995-08-0101 August 1995
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs
ML20087D5401995-08-0101 August 1995
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs
ML20087C2101995-07-10010 July 1995
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial
ML20083K0341995-05-0101 May 1995
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors. Endorses NEI Comments
ML20082G1901995-04-11011 April 1995
Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Np Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation.Expresses Concern Over Lack of Communication Between NRC & Licensee When Employer Not Notified
ML20072K3201994-08-0505 August 1994
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to Fitness for Duty Requirements.Recommends That Present Scope of Coverage & Detail of Random Testing Requirements Be Retained
ML17331B0071993-09-29029 September 1993
Comments Supporting NUMARC Opinions Re Whistleblowers Protection
ML17331A9411993-08-16016 August 1993
Submits Comments on Draft NUREG-1477, Voltage-Based Interim Plugging Criteria for SG Tubes-Task Group Rept. NUREG Recommendations Do Not Take Into Consideration Plants That Are Operating W/Interim Plugging Criteria
ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning
ML20045D7381993-06-22022 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Opposes Rule
ML20044E1441993-05-0303 May 1993
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Required Emergency Planning from Annual to Biennial
ML20101P4461992-06-26026 June 1992
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl
ML17328A4921990-09-27027 September 1990
Affidavit of SA Toelle Requesting That Summary Rept TR-MCC-153, C-E Steam Generator Tube Sleeve Residual Stress Evaluation Be Treated as Proprietary
ML19332F2021989-12-0101 December 1989
Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. More Flexibility Should Be Provided in Guidelines for Organizations
ML20235T2381989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degreed Status for Senior Operating License Holders.Proposal Both Unneeded,Unwarranted & Issue Should Be Put to Rest.Pursuit of Proposal Will Deter Valuable Employees from Industry
ML20235N7281989-02-17017 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Shares Commissioner Robert Concerns on Existence of Rule
ML20235P4031989-02-0909 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rules Provide Needless Demoralizing Effect on Reactor Operators
ML20155A0291988-09-30030 September 1988
Temporary Exemption from Requirements of Property Insurance Rule,Effective 881004
ML20151M3901988-07-29029 July 1988
Comment Endorsing Comments Submitted by Shaw,Pittman,Potts & Trowbridge Re Fee Schedules for Licensees.Amount of NRC Attention Received by Plant Largely Outside Plant Control, Thus Making Form of Billing in Rule Randomly Unfair
ML20136D8251985-11-20020 November 1985
Memorandum & Order Granting Util 850917 Request for Extension of 851130 Deadline for Environ Qualification of Electrical Equipment,Until Planned Feb 1986 Refueling Outage.Served on 851120
ML20138M8711985-10-25025 October 1985
Transcript of 851025 Meeting in Washington,Dc Re Util Requests for Exemption from Environ Qualification.Pp 1-76
ML17317A9141979-01-26026 January 1979
Forwards Endorsements 29 & 30 to Maelu Policy MF-79 & Endorsements 36 & 37 to ANI Policy NF-206
1997-07-03
[Table view]
Category:PUBLIC COMMENTS ON PROPOSED RULES & PETITIONS FOR
MONTHYEARML20148U4501997-07-0303 July 1997
Comment on NUREG-1606, Proposed RG Re to Implementation of 10CFR50.59 (Changes,Tests or Experiments)
ML17333A9201997-06-18018 June 1997
Comment on Draft NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems
ML20097F8161996-02-0909 February 1996
Comment Opposing PRM 50-63 Re Use of Ki as Protective Action for Emergency Workers & Public.Protests Significant Costs & Suggests Potential Benefits Unclear
ML17333A2151995-12-11011 December 1995
Comment Supporting Draft GL 83-11,Suppl 1 Providing Guidelines to Licensees Who Wish to Perform Their Own Safety & Reactor Core Design Analyses.Eliminates Need to Submit Detailed Topical Reports & Will Save Limited NRC Resources
ML17332A9211995-08-14014 August 1995
Comment Supporting Draft Rg DG-1043, Nuclear Power Plant Simulation Facilities for Use in Operator License Exam.
ML20087D5111995-08-0101 August 1995
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs
ML20087D5401995-08-0101 August 1995
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR52 Re Standard Design Certification for ABWR & Sys 80+ Designs
ML20087C2101995-07-10010 July 1995
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Changes in Frequency Requirements for Emergency Planning & Preparedness Exercises from Annual to Biennial
ML20083K0341995-05-0101 May 1995
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50, Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactors. Endorses NEI Comments
ML20082G1901995-04-11011 April 1995
Comment Supporting Draft Policy Statement Re Freedom of Employees in Np Industry to Raise Concerns W/O Fear of Retaliation.Expresses Concern Over Lack of Communication Between NRC & Licensee When Employer Not Notified
ML20072K3201994-08-0505 August 1994
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Changes to Fitness for Duty Requirements.Recommends That Present Scope of Coverage & Detail of Random Testing Requirements Be Retained
ML17331B0071993-09-29029 September 1993
Comments Supporting NUMARC Opinions Re Whistleblowers Protection
ML17331A9411993-08-16016 August 1993
Submits Comments on Draft NUREG-1477, Voltage-Based Interim Plugging Criteria for SG Tubes-Task Group Rept. NUREG Recommendations Do Not Take Into Consideration Plants That Are Operating W/Interim Plugging Criteria
ML20056E5101993-08-11011 August 1993
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR20 Re Radiological Criteria for Decommissioning
ML20045D7381993-06-22022 June 1993
Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Opposes Rule
ML20044E1441993-05-0303 May 1993
Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Required Emergency Planning from Annual to Biennial
ML20101P4461992-06-26026 June 1992
Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl
ML19332F2021989-12-0101 December 1989
Comments on Draft Reg Guide,Task DG-1001, Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants. More Flexibility Should Be Provided in Guidelines for Organizations
ML20235T2381989-02-27027 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Degreed Status for Senior Operating License Holders.Proposal Both Unneeded,Unwarranted & Issue Should Be Put to Rest.Pursuit of Proposal Will Deter Valuable Employees from Industry
ML20235N7281989-02-17017 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants.Util Shares Commissioner Robert Concerns on Existence of Rule
ML20235P4031989-02-0909 February 1989
Comment Opposing Proposed Rules 10CFR50 & 55 Re Educ & Experience Requirements for Senior Reactor Operators & Supervisors at Nuclear Power Plants.Rules Provide Needless Demoralizing Effect on Reactor Operators
ML20151M3901988-07-29029 July 1988
Comment Endorsing Comments Submitted by Shaw,Pittman,Potts & Trowbridge Re Fee Schedules for Licensees.Amount of NRC Attention Received by Plant Largely Outside Plant Control, Thus Making Form of Billing in Rule Randomly Unfair
1997-07-03
[Table view] |
Text
RIC)RIT'Y Z UDOCS OFFSITE FACILITY)
REGULATOR< 'INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9512140224 DOC.DATE: 95/12/11 NOTARIZED: NO DOCKET FACIL:50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 050003l5 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear PoAer Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH. NAME . AUTHOR AFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E. Indiana 'Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana 6 Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Division o2 Freedom of Information 6 Publications Services
SUBJECT:
Comment supporting draft GL 83-11,Suppl 1 providing guidelines to licensees who wish to perform their own safety reactor core design analyses. Eliminates need to submit detailed topical reports 6 will save limited NRC resources.
DISTRIBUTION CODE: DS09D TITLE: SECY/DSB Dist: Public COPIES RECEIVED:LTR Comment on Proposed L Rule ENCL
(
SIZE:
R) -Misc Notice; Reg G NOTES:
RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL INTERNA 'LEOGC/DR 15-B-18 R~ NMSS/IMOB RES DIR T8F5 RES/DRA/DEPY RES/DST EXTERNAL: NRC PDR NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2083 ) TO ELIMINATEYOUR NAME FROM
'ISTRIBUTION LISTS I'OR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 7 ENCL
/3S onf
/++~on Indiana Mtnblgan Power Company
~
l'Calfà PO Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 I'3 (.,I 2: 32 INOIANA NlCHEGAN fiULES l=>>, an .
PQWM USibPiI'.
December 11, 1995 AFP:NRC:1240 Docket: Nos.: 50-315 50-316 Chief, Rules Review & Directives Branch U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Stop T-6D-69 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Gentlemen:
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Units 1 and 2 COMMENTS ON DRAFT GENERIC LETTER 83-11, SUPPLEMENT 1 (LICENSEE QUALIFICATION FOR PERFORMING SAFETY ANALYSES)
In the October 25, 1995, Federal Register Notice (60 FRN 54712),
the NRC promulgated a draft set of revised guidelines to licensees who wish to perform their own safety and reactor core design analyses. This set of guidelines would replace those in Generic Letter (GL) 83-11, issued February 8, 1983. The purpose of this letter is to provide comments regarding the draft guidelines.
We concur with the NRC's decision to shorten the reeiew and approval process by eliminating the need to submit detailed topical reports. We believe the guidelines provided in At:tachment 1 to the generic letter supplement will continue to assure that the design analysis is performed using a valid methodology. Also, the new approach will save limited NRC resources currently required for methodology review and result in more eficient use of utility resources if methodology work.
there is no waiting period after completion of the As a recommended clarification on one of the points given in the generic letter supplement, the following comment is provided.
9512140224 951211 PDR ADOCK 05000315 PDR
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP:NRC:1240 Page 2 Comment - Attachment 1 to the draft generic letter supplement provides guidelines for licensees to use approved codes. Section 2.1 in Attachment 1 states: "The only codes and methods that are addressed by this process are those that the NRC has reviewed and approved."
Different versions of previously approved codes (e.g.,
core design codes) that have been modified by the vendor to correct errors or to incorporate enhancements to the codes should be acceptable. It is suggested that, as long as the calculational methodology is not changed, the licensee should be able to use the new version of the code.
Sincerely, E. E. Fitzpatrick Vice President eh CC', A. Blind G. Charnoff H. J. Hiller NFEM Section Chief NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman J. R. Padgett T. E. Tipton - NEI
la L i' 4
4
'I
