|
---|
Category:OPERATING LICENSES-APPLIATION TO AMEND-RENEW EXISTING
MONTHYEARML18066A3251998-11-0909 November 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,deleting CVCS Operability Requirements Currently in LCOs 3.2 & 3.17.6 & Associated Testing Requirements in SRs 4.2 & 4.17 ML18066A1981998-06-17017 June 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,updating TS to Reflect Reduced Min Reactor Vessel Flow Rate Assumption in Accident Analyses ML18065B1831998-03-13013 March 1998 Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting Relocation of TS Section 4.16 Snubber Testing Requirements to Plant Operating Requirements Manual (Orm).Affected Orm Pages Encl ML18065B1781998-03-13013 March 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Auxiliary Feedwater TS to Allow Installation of Plant Mod W/O Requiring Plant Shutdown ML18067A7051997-10-0101 October 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,proposing That TS Flywheel Insp Period Be Lengthened to Ten Years & Deleting Note Re Insp at End of Cycle 12 ML18067A6751997-09-0303 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,deleting Snubber Operability Requirements in LCO 3.20 & Snubber Testing Requirements in Surveillance Requirement 4.16 ML18067A6711997-09-0303 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,reflecting Capabilities of Installed CR Ventilation Equipment & Emulate Std Tech Specs,C-E Plants,Per NUREG-1432 Requirements for Sys ML18067A4511997-03-26026 March 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,allowing Entry Into Air Lock to Perform Repairs on Inoperable Air Lock Door & Thereby Avoid Potential for Unnecessary Plant Shutdown ML18065A4891996-02-0606 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting to Remove cross-train Testing Requirements from LCO Action Statements ML18065A4381996-01-18018 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS to Allow Use of 10CFR50 App J Option B Containment Testing & Use of Warning Light to Identify Certain High Radiation Areas,To Suppl 951211 Administrative Controls Change Request ML18065A4341996-01-18018 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Re Primary Coolant Pump Flywheel Insp.Rev 1 to Structural Integrity Assoc,Inc Rept SIR-94-080, Relaxation of Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheel Insp Requirements Encl ML18065A4051996-01-10010 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting Exemption from 10CFR50 App J TS Change Request Concerning Local Leak Test Requirements for Emergency Escape Airlock in Plant Containment Bldg ML18065A3821996-01-0505 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising SDC Requirements & Bases for TS Section 3.1.9.3 Prior to 1996 Refueling Outage ML18065A3751995-12-27027 December 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,rewriting Electrical Power Sys Sections of TS & Bases to Closely Emulate STS ML18065A3461995-12-11011 December 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising Administrative Controls Section to Emulate CE STS by Removing Review & Audit Requirements of Section 6.5 & Record Retention Requirements of Section 6.10 from TS ML18065A3321995-12-0606 December 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,relocating Crane Operation & Movement of Heavy Loads Requirements & Bases from TS to Other Plant Documents Prior to 1996 Refueling Outage ML18065A1741995-10-17017 October 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Paragraph 2.B.(2) to Ref 10CFR40 & to Allow Use of Source Matls as Reactor Fuel,Rewording Paragraph 2.E & Deleting Paragraph 2.7 & Revising TS Pressurizer Cooldown Limit ML18064A8391995-07-0505 July 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,deleting TS 6.4, Training & Revising TS 6.5.1.2 on Plant Review Committee Composition & 6.5.3.1 & 6.5.3.2,clarifying & Modifying Function & Composition of Plant Safety & Licensing Staff ML18064A7591995-05-0101 May 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20.Amend Would Place Requirements in TS Section 4.7 for Periodic DG Peak Load Tests ML18064A6121995-02-10010 February 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,proposing One Time Deferral of 18-month Refueling Interval Surveillance Tests ML18064A5821995-01-13013 January 1995 Tech Specs Change Request to License DPR-20 Addressing Required Settings & Allowable as Found & as Left Tolerances for Primary & Secondary Safety Valves ML18064A5341994-12-29029 December 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TSs Re Iodine Removal Sys ML18064A5061994-12-13013 December 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,adding Third High Thermal Performance DNB Correlation to Safety Limit 2.1 ML18064A4081994-10-0505 October 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Relating to Primary Coolant Sys pressure-temp Limits.Rev 0 to Engineering Analysis EA-A-PAL-92-095-01 & Excerpts from Rosemount Instruction Manual 4515,dtd Jan 1988 Encl ML18059B0961994-07-0707 July 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Re Shutdown Cooling.Changes Intended to Resolve Concerns Arose During NRC Review of Change Request ML18059A9751994-05-0505 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Re Shutdown Cooling.Changes Necessary Due to Intervening Amends Containing Listed Differences from Pages Submitted on 930519 ML18059A9321994-04-0707 April 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting TS Change Re Instrumentation & Control Section ML18059A9411994-04-0707 April 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,relocating Cycle Specific Operating Limits to Colr,Per Guidance of GL 88-16, Removal of Cycle-Specific Parameter Limits from Ts. Proposed COLR Encl ML18059A8851994-03-11011 March 1994 Rev to 940222 I&C TS Change Request to License DPR-20,adding Surveillance Item 10 to Table 4.2.1 Which Require Verifying SIT Level & Pressure Each Shift & Adding Three Paragraphs to Basis for Proposed Section 3.17 ML18059A3721993-09-0303 September 1993 Changes to 930129 Application for Amend to License DPR-20, Modifying Radial Peaking Factor Limits in TS Table 3.23-2 to Incorporate Appropriate Limits for Modified L Fuel Assemblies Recently Installed in Reactor for Cycle 11 ML18058B8991993-06-25025 June 1993 Revises 921208 Application for Amend to License DPR-20 & Brings Proposed Specifications Closer to Model Tech Specs, While Retaining Necessary plant-specific Differences & Updating Proposed Pages to Reflect Amends 147 & 149 ML18058B7421993-03-29029 March 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS to Required Frequency for Surveillance Test Which Requires Moving Each Control Rod to Once Each 92 Days Instead of Once Every 2 Wks ML18058B3881993-01-29029 January 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,consisting of Proposed TS Changes to Table 3.23-2, Radiation Peaking Factor Limits for Cycle 11. Offsite Dose Calculations & EMF-92-178, Palisades Cycle 11:Disposition & ... Encl ML18058B3481993-01-19019 January 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Surveillance Interval for Testing Control Rod Drive mechanisms,CRD-20 & CRD-31 from Every Two Wks to Once in Mar 1993 ML18058A5631992-06-22022 June 1992 Suppl to 920317 Application for Amend to License DPR-20, Consisting of Revised Page 3-82 Re Shutdown Cooling ML18058A5561992-06-12012 June 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS to Better Coordinate Required Action Statement of Electrical Sys Spec W/Lco to Allow Testing & Loading of DG When Plant Above 325 F But Not Yet Critical ML18058A5491992-06-12012 June 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS to Delete Requirements Re Iodine Removal Sys Hydrazine Storage Tank Since Use of Hydrazine No Longer Considered in Current Rev of SRP ML18058A3631992-04-15015 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TSs to Incorporate Generic Ltr 90-06 PORV Requirements for Power Operation & Modifying Pcs Overpressure Protection Spec Venting Requirements ML18058A2921992-03-18018 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Re Shutdown Cooling ML18058A1541992-02-0303 February 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,deleting Three Primary Coolant Pump Testing Requirements & Revising Safety Limits & Limiting Safety Sys Settings Specs to Enhance Clarity of Subj Requirements ML18057B3711991-11-12012 November 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising Tech Specs to Remove Schedule for Withdrawal of Reactor Vessel Matl Specimens,Per Generic Ltr 91-01 ML18057B3481991-11-0101 November 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS for Operation During Cycle 10 as Results of Changes to Fuel Design (Reload N) & Fuel Mgt Scheme for Low Leakage Core. Siemens Repts EMF-91-176 & EMF-91-177 Encl ML18057B3061991-09-27027 September 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,proposing Change to Tech Spec 5.2.3.a Re Containment Air Cooler Design,Per 861020 & 870430 Requests ML18057B3021991-09-26026 September 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,consisting of Rev 2 to 890628 Request,In Response to Recommendations of Generic Ltr 88-17 to Add Shutdown Cooling Sys Operability Requirements to Tech Specs ML18057B1681991-07-15015 July 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting Tech Spec Changes in Administrative Controls W/Emphasis on Changes in Engineering ML18057A9821991-06-13013 June 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising Tech Specs to Incorporate Change to Inservice Insp Program for Shock Suppressors (Snubbers) ML18057A9631991-05-30030 May 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Tech Specs to Incorporate Change to Reactor Variable High Power Trip setpoint.ANF-90-181, Review & Analysis of SRP Chapter 15 Events for Palisades W/15% Variable High Power... Encl ML18057A9551991-05-28028 May 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Tech Specs Re Inservice Insp Program for Shock Suppressors (Snubbers) ML18057A8881991-05-0101 May 1991 Rev 1 to Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS Re Shutdown Cooling Sys Per Generic Ltr 88-17,by Adding Operability Requirements for Shutdown Cooling Sys & Steam Generators ML18057A8291991-03-25025 March 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Tech Specs Section 4.5.2a(2) & 4.5.2b(3) 1998-06-17
[Table view] Category:TEXT-LICENSE APPLICATIONS & PERMITS
MONTHYEARML18066A3251998-11-0909 November 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,deleting CVCS Operability Requirements Currently in LCOs 3.2 & 3.17.6 & Associated Testing Requirements in SRs 4.2 & 4.17 ML18066A1981998-06-17017 June 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,updating TS to Reflect Reduced Min Reactor Vessel Flow Rate Assumption in Accident Analyses ML18065B1831998-03-13013 March 1998 Revised Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting Relocation of TS Section 4.16 Snubber Testing Requirements to Plant Operating Requirements Manual (Orm).Affected Orm Pages Encl ML18065B1781998-03-13013 March 1998 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Auxiliary Feedwater TS to Allow Installation of Plant Mod W/O Requiring Plant Shutdown ML18067A7051997-10-0101 October 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,proposing That TS Flywheel Insp Period Be Lengthened to Ten Years & Deleting Note Re Insp at End of Cycle 12 ML18067A6751997-09-0303 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,deleting Snubber Operability Requirements in LCO 3.20 & Snubber Testing Requirements in Surveillance Requirement 4.16 ML18067A6711997-09-0303 September 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,reflecting Capabilities of Installed CR Ventilation Equipment & Emulate Std Tech Specs,C-E Plants,Per NUREG-1432 Requirements for Sys ML18067A4511997-03-26026 March 1997 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,allowing Entry Into Air Lock to Perform Repairs on Inoperable Air Lock Door & Thereby Avoid Potential for Unnecessary Plant Shutdown ML18065A4891996-02-0606 February 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting to Remove cross-train Testing Requirements from LCO Action Statements ML18065A4381996-01-18018 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS to Allow Use of 10CFR50 App J Option B Containment Testing & Use of Warning Light to Identify Certain High Radiation Areas,To Suppl 951211 Administrative Controls Change Request ML18065A4341996-01-18018 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Re Primary Coolant Pump Flywheel Insp.Rev 1 to Structural Integrity Assoc,Inc Rept SIR-94-080, Relaxation of Reactor Coolant Pump Flywheel Insp Requirements Encl ML18065A4051996-01-10010 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting Exemption from 10CFR50 App J TS Change Request Concerning Local Leak Test Requirements for Emergency Escape Airlock in Plant Containment Bldg ML18065A3821996-01-0505 January 1996 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising SDC Requirements & Bases for TS Section 3.1.9.3 Prior to 1996 Refueling Outage ML18065A3751995-12-27027 December 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,rewriting Electrical Power Sys Sections of TS & Bases to Closely Emulate STS ML18065A3461995-12-11011 December 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising Administrative Controls Section to Emulate CE STS by Removing Review & Audit Requirements of Section 6.5 & Record Retention Requirements of Section 6.10 from TS ML18065A3321995-12-0606 December 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,relocating Crane Operation & Movement of Heavy Loads Requirements & Bases from TS to Other Plant Documents Prior to 1996 Refueling Outage ML18065A1741995-10-17017 October 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Paragraph 2.B.(2) to Ref 10CFR40 & to Allow Use of Source Matls as Reactor Fuel,Rewording Paragraph 2.E & Deleting Paragraph 2.7 & Revising TS Pressurizer Cooldown Limit ML18064A8391995-07-0505 July 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,deleting TS 6.4, Training & Revising TS 6.5.1.2 on Plant Review Committee Composition & 6.5.3.1 & 6.5.3.2,clarifying & Modifying Function & Composition of Plant Safety & Licensing Staff ML18064A7591995-05-0101 May 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20.Amend Would Place Requirements in TS Section 4.7 for Periodic DG Peak Load Tests ML18064A6121995-02-10010 February 1995 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,proposing One Time Deferral of 18-month Refueling Interval Surveillance Tests ML18064A5821995-01-13013 January 1995 Tech Specs Change Request to License DPR-20 Addressing Required Settings & Allowable as Found & as Left Tolerances for Primary & Secondary Safety Valves ML18064A5341994-12-29029 December 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TSs Re Iodine Removal Sys ML18064A5061994-12-13013 December 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,adding Third High Thermal Performance DNB Correlation to Safety Limit 2.1 ML18064A4081994-10-0505 October 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Relating to Primary Coolant Sys pressure-temp Limits.Rev 0 to Engineering Analysis EA-A-PAL-92-095-01 & Excerpts from Rosemount Instruction Manual 4515,dtd Jan 1988 Encl ML18059B0961994-07-0707 July 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Re Shutdown Cooling.Changes Intended to Resolve Concerns Arose During NRC Review of Change Request ML18059A9751994-05-0505 May 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Re Shutdown Cooling.Changes Necessary Due to Intervening Amends Containing Listed Differences from Pages Submitted on 930519 ML18059A9321994-04-0707 April 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting TS Change Re Instrumentation & Control Section ML18059A9411994-04-0707 April 1994 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,relocating Cycle Specific Operating Limits to Colr,Per Guidance of GL 88-16, Removal of Cycle-Specific Parameter Limits from Ts. Proposed COLR Encl ML18059A8851994-03-11011 March 1994 Rev to 940222 I&C TS Change Request to License DPR-20,adding Surveillance Item 10 to Table 4.2.1 Which Require Verifying SIT Level & Pressure Each Shift & Adding Three Paragraphs to Basis for Proposed Section 3.17 ML18059A3721993-09-0303 September 1993 Changes to 930129 Application for Amend to License DPR-20, Modifying Radial Peaking Factor Limits in TS Table 3.23-2 to Incorporate Appropriate Limits for Modified L Fuel Assemblies Recently Installed in Reactor for Cycle 11 ML18058B8991993-06-25025 June 1993 Revises 921208 Application for Amend to License DPR-20 & Brings Proposed Specifications Closer to Model Tech Specs, While Retaining Necessary plant-specific Differences & Updating Proposed Pages to Reflect Amends 147 & 149 ML18058B7421993-03-29029 March 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS to Required Frequency for Surveillance Test Which Requires Moving Each Control Rod to Once Each 92 Days Instead of Once Every 2 Wks ML18058B3881993-01-29029 January 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,consisting of Proposed TS Changes to Table 3.23-2, Radiation Peaking Factor Limits for Cycle 11. Offsite Dose Calculations & EMF-92-178, Palisades Cycle 11:Disposition & ... Encl ML18058B3481993-01-19019 January 1993 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Surveillance Interval for Testing Control Rod Drive mechanisms,CRD-20 & CRD-31 from Every Two Wks to Once in Mar 1993 ML18058A5631992-06-22022 June 1992 Suppl to 920317 Application for Amend to License DPR-20, Consisting of Revised Page 3-82 Re Shutdown Cooling ML18058A5561992-06-12012 June 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS to Better Coordinate Required Action Statement of Electrical Sys Spec W/Lco to Allow Testing & Loading of DG When Plant Above 325 F But Not Yet Critical ML18058A5491992-06-12012 June 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS to Delete Requirements Re Iodine Removal Sys Hydrazine Storage Tank Since Use of Hydrazine No Longer Considered in Current Rev of SRP ML18058A3631992-04-15015 April 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TSs to Incorporate Generic Ltr 90-06 PORV Requirements for Power Operation & Modifying Pcs Overpressure Protection Spec Venting Requirements ML18058A2921992-03-18018 March 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising TS Re Shutdown Cooling ML18058A1541992-02-0303 February 1992 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,deleting Three Primary Coolant Pump Testing Requirements & Revising Safety Limits & Limiting Safety Sys Settings Specs to Enhance Clarity of Subj Requirements ML18057B3711991-11-12012 November 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising Tech Specs to Remove Schedule for Withdrawal of Reactor Vessel Matl Specimens,Per Generic Ltr 91-01 ML18057B3481991-11-0101 November 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS for Operation During Cycle 10 as Results of Changes to Fuel Design (Reload N) & Fuel Mgt Scheme for Low Leakage Core. Siemens Repts EMF-91-176 & EMF-91-177 Encl ML18057B3061991-09-27027 September 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,proposing Change to Tech Spec 5.2.3.a Re Containment Air Cooler Design,Per 861020 & 870430 Requests ML18057B3021991-09-26026 September 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,consisting of Rev 2 to 890628 Request,In Response to Recommendations of Generic Ltr 88-17 to Add Shutdown Cooling Sys Operability Requirements to Tech Specs ML18057B1681991-07-15015 July 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,requesting Tech Spec Changes in Administrative Controls W/Emphasis on Changes in Engineering ML18057A9821991-06-13013 June 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,revising Tech Specs to Incorporate Change to Inservice Insp Program for Shock Suppressors (Snubbers) ML18057A9631991-05-30030 May 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Tech Specs to Incorporate Change to Reactor Variable High Power Trip setpoint.ANF-90-181, Review & Analysis of SRP Chapter 15 Events for Palisades W/15% Variable High Power... Encl ML18057A9551991-05-28028 May 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Tech Specs Re Inservice Insp Program for Shock Suppressors (Snubbers) ML18057A8881991-05-0101 May 1991 Rev 1 to Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing TS Re Shutdown Cooling Sys Per Generic Ltr 88-17,by Adding Operability Requirements for Shutdown Cooling Sys & Steam Generators ML18057A8291991-03-25025 March 1991 Application for Amend to License DPR-20,changing Tech Specs Section 4.5.2a(2) & 4.5.2b(3) 1998-06-17
[Table view] |
Text
consumers Power.
company General Offices: 1945 West Parnell Road,.Jackson, Ml 49201 * (517) 788-0550 August 6, 1984 Dennis M Crutchfield, Chief Operating Reactor Branch No 5 Nuclear Reactor Regulation US Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC. 20555 DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST -
PLANT REVIEW COMMITTEE Enclosed are three (3) originals and thirty seven (37) conformed copies of a Request for Change to the Palisades Technical Specifications. The proposed change responds to NRC concerns regarding Plant Review Committee (PRC) review and approval of documents by document routing. NRC Region III letter dated May 1, 1984 and several subsequent telephone conversations with NRC Region III and NRR staff members identified the need for PRC discussion via meeting for certain important issues. The enclosed incorporates these issues.
Pursuant to 10 CFR 170.21, a check in the amount of $150.00 is attached.
Director, Nuclear Licensing CC Administrator, Region III, USNRC RWalker, Branch Chief Region I NRC Resident Inspector - Palisades Attachment
/Joo/
Rec'J W/ c.~lt.
OC0884-0004C-NL02
- '1*¥'tJo FoR 11so.,,.
1'
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY
. DOCKET 50-255 - LICENSE DPR PALISADES PLANT REQUEST FOR CHANGE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS For the reasons hereinafter set forth, it is requested that the Technical Specifications contained in the Provisional Operating License DPR-20, Docket 50-255, issued to Consumers Power Company on October 16, 1972, for the Palisades Plant be changed as described in Section I below:
I. CHANGE(s)
A. *insert the following paragraph after item (i) of Section 6.5.1.6.
"PRC review may be performed through a routing of the item subject to the requirements of Specification 6.5.1.7."
B. Insert the following paragraph after item (c) of Section 6.5.1.7.
"The PRC Chairman may recommend to the Plant General Manager approval of those items identified in Specifcations 6.5.1.6 a.
through d. above based on a routing review provided the following conditions are met: (1) at least five PRC members, including the Chairman and no more than 2 alternates, shall review the item, concur with the determination as to whether or not the item constitutes an unreviewed safety question, and provide written comments on the item; (2) all comments shall be resolved to the satisfaction of the reviewers providing the comments; and (3) if the PRC Chairman determines that the comments are significant, the item (including comments and resolutions shall be recirculated to all reviewers for additional comments.)
The item shall be reviewed at a PRC meeting in the event that: Ci) comments are not resolved; or (2) the Plant General Ma~ager over-rides the recommendati.ons of the PRC; or (3) a proposed change to the Technical Specifications involves a safety limit, a limiting safety system setting or a limiting condition of operation; or (4) the item was reportable to th.e NRC.
Revised Technical Specification pages are attached. Proposed changes are shown by a vertical.line in the right-hand margin.
II. DISCUSSION Consumers Power Company letter dated February 21, 1984 contained a discussion of the administrative controls employed in the PRC (Plant Review Committee) review and approval of documents by document routing (i.e., ballot). By letter dated May 1, 1984 from James G Keppler (NRC Region III), the NRC Staff responded to our February 21, 1984 letter by stating that committee action (i.e., recommendation of approval or disapproval to the PRC chairman) is required to occur in session, with the quorum present, although review by ballot is allowed. The purpose of the proposed change is to permit Committee reviews and recommended approvals of certain documents to be performed through a ballot-type OC0684-0004-NL02
2 II. D1SCUSSION (Continued) review process as opposed to requiring the committee to meet in session to render final decisions. We believe that the firm requirement for a committee meeting, as currently specified by our Technical Specifica-tions, may have a detrimental effect on the involvement of Plant manage-ment in the safe operation of the Plant, and should therefore be reconsidered in that light.
Review and Approval Recommendations By Ballot Consumers Power Company agrees with the NRC in their May 1, 1984 letter that failure "to.provide for inter-disciplinary interface and discussion, and application of collective knowledge and wisdom to the proposed issues at hand" has the potential to degrade significantly the purpose and .
function of the PRC review. However, we feel that the controls previously employed at both our plants adequately provided for this inter-disciplinary interface and discussions while efficiently utilizing staff time. (Note: In accordance with the May 1, 1984 letter and until such time as this matter is finally resolved, we have revised our practices to preclude PRC recommendation of approval of documents other than by holding a meeting.) Our previous procedures required that an "equivalent" quorum of PRC members (i.e., at least five members including the Chairman and no more than two designated alternates) review the document without being required to meet in session and that all comments and concerns identified by this review be resolved prior to recommenda-tion of approval and implementation.
If, in the opinion of the PRC Chairman, the comments led to significant changes to the original document, the revised documents along with all comments and concerns were either recirculated to all reviewers or brought to the next PRC meeting. Thus, each member's comments/concerns were reviewed by the committee as a whole, either individually or in session, allowing ample opportunity for inter-disciplinary interface and discussion. The PRC Chairman could then approve the document review (i.e., recommendation of approval or disapproval to the Plant Manager) or withhold such authorization until approval of the item by the Committee sitting in session.
Alternatives The following are several alternatives to the pref erred method of ballot review and recommendation of approval. The potential impact on the quality of the reviews and on PRC members' time is also discussed.
- 1. Review by Ballot/Recommendation of Approval Action by S:ommittee in Session This alternate is currently being followed until this issue is finally resolved. Review is by a "equivalent" quorum of PRC members and is generally via ballot. Final recommendation of OC0684-0004-NL02
3 II. DISCUSSION (Cpntinued) approval action requires a Committee meeting with a quorum present.
The second review by the Committee in session will not substantially affect the overall quality of the review, although it will result in additional time being spent in meetings to the obvious detriment of the plant management function.
- 2. Review and Approval Action by Committee in Session This .alternative would require all PRC activities to be performed in session and would result in an inordinate amount ~f time being spent in PRC meetings at the obvious expense of the plant management function. Plant managers are primary members of the PRC and are present at most meetings since PRC decisions are considered to be of such importance as to require review and decision by the Plant Management. In addition, the quality of the review of proposed changes might suffer because the members would not have sufficient time prior to the meeting, as a result of the heavy PRC meeting schedule, to solicit comments from their staff. With close to 1,500 items requiring PRC review each year, this alternative would certainly not be practical.
- 3. Review by Other Appropriate Personnel/Review and Recommendation of Approval Action by Committee- in Session Review by personnel other than PRC members is permitted by Technical Specifications. *An initial review could be performed by another organization such as the Nuclear Activities Plant Organiza-tion (NAPO), or a subcommittee of PRC members, prior to being presented to the full PRC in session for final review and recommenda-tion of approval action. In fact, this approach is currently being employed for the PRC review of Q-list interpretations at Palisades Plant, but has not been used for PRC review of proposed changes in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59. It has the potential to reduce the workload on the Committee, but at the expense of the quality of the review (the full expertise of the Committee would not be brought to bear on the review of the proposed change since the Committee members, i.e., Plant management, would of necessity be forced to rely heavily on the review performed by the reviewing organiza-tion). However, the converse is also a possibility in that the Committee members, being ultimately responsible both as members of PRC and as plant management, may choose to perform the same level of review as would be performed for alternative #2, thereby resulting in a similar time commitment as for that alternative and a substantial duplication of efforts.
OC0684-0004-NL02
4 Summary Consumers Power Company believes that the preferred alternative for
<conducting PRC business is to permit the Chairman to exercise the PRC's review approval authority as discussed previously. All other possible alternatives are expected to either reduce the quality of the reviews performed by the Committee and/or have a significant negative impact on the plant management function.
Analysis of No Significant Hazards Consideration It is believed that this change will result in an improvement in the PRC review and approval process such that the PRC responsibilities will be less burdensome on plant management personnel. Reviews conducted outside of a PRC meeting are more thorough since PRC members are able to concentrate solely on the item being reviewed in a time frame suitable for the individual expertise. The proposed change does not affect any analyzed accident scenario. Therefore, the operation of the facility in accordance with the above change would not: 1) involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated; or 2) create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated; or 3) involve a significant reduction in the margin of safety.
II I. CONCLUSION The Palisades Plant Review Committee has reviewed this Technical Specif i-cation Change Request and has determined that this change does not involve an unreviewed safety question and therefore involves no signif i-cant hazards consideration. This change has also been reviewed under the cognizance of the Nuclear Safety Board. A copy of this Technical
- Specification Change Request has been sent to the State of Michigan official designated to receive such Amendments to the Operating License.
- NS?!ifik;J/( ~
R B DeWitt, Vice President Nuclear Operations Sworn and subscribed to before me this 6th day of August 1984.
Sherry L Du ey, Notary Jackson County, Michigan J
My commission expires November 5, 1986.
SHERRY l YNN DURFEY OC0684-0004B-NL02 Notary Fublic, Jackson Coun~ Mlcll.
My Commission Expires Nov. ~ 1986