ML18051B023

Proposed Tech Spec Re Administrative Controls

ML18051B023
Person / Time
Site:	Palisades
Issue date:	08/06/1984
From:	CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.)
To:
Shared Package
ML18051B022	List: ML18051B021 ML18051B023
References
NUDOCS 8408100138
Download: ML18051B023 (2)

Text

,.

Consumers Power Company Palisades Plant - Docket 50-255 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGE REQUEST

. PROPOSED PAGE 1 Page TS0784-0001B-NL02

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.5.1.6 Responsibilities (Continued)

i. Review of events requiring 24-hour written notification to ~he Ccilillllission.

PRC review may be performed through a routing of the item subject to the requirements of Specification 6.5.1. 7.

6.5.1.7 Authority The PRC shall:

a *. Recommend in writing to the Plant General Manager approval or disapproval of items considered under Specifications 6.5.1.6.a. through d. above.

b. Render determinations in writing with regard to whether or not each item considered under specifications 6.5.1.6.a. through

e. above constitutes an unreviewed safety question.

c. Provide written notification within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> to the Vice President - Nuclear operations and to the Vice Chairman of NSB of any disagreement between the PRC and the Plant General Manager; however, the Plant General Manager shall have responsibility for the resolution of such disagreements pursuant to Specification 6.1.1 above.

The* PRC Chairman may recommend to the Plant General Manager approval of those items identified in Specifications 6.5.1.6 a. through d.

above based on a routing review provided the following conditions are met: (1) at least five PRC members, including the Chairman and no more than 2 alternates, shall review the item, concur with determinations as to whether or not the item constitutes an unreviewed safety question, and provide written comments on the item; (2). all comments shall be resolved to the satis~action of* the reviewers providing the comments; and (3) if the PRC Chairman determines that the comments are significant, the item (including comments and resolutions) shall be recirculated to all reviewers for additional comments.

The item shall be reviewed at a PRC meeting in the event that: (1) comments are not resolved; or (2) the Plant General Manager over-rides the recommendations of the PRC; or (3) a proposed chane to the Technical Specifications involves a safety limit, a limiting safety system setting or a limiting condition of operation; or (4) the item was reportable to the NRC.

6-6 PROPOSED TS0784-0001-NL02