ML111650038: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| page count = 19 | | page count = 19 | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:Seabrook Station Assessment MeetingSeabrook StationSafety Performance in 2010 | |||
&&U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events2010 Reactor Oversight ProcessNuclear Regulatory Commission -Region I 1 | |||
NRC Representatives*James Clifford-Deputy Dir ector, Division of Reactor Projects*Arthur Burritt -Branch Chief *William Raymond -Senior Resident Inspector | |||
*Jonathan Johnson -Resident Inspector 2 | |||
Agenda*Introduction*Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook*Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events*NRC to address public questions | |||
*Closing remarks 3 | |||
*NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner thatpreserved the public health and safety and protected the environment. | |||
NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix*Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4 | |||
*6753hours of inspection and related activities | |||
*2 resident inspectors on site -residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events atanytime Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook at any time*3 major team inspections | |||
*CDBI*Emergency Planning | |||
*PI&R 5 | |||
*AllGreenPerformanceJanuary 1 through December 31, 2010Performance Indicator and Inspection Results Seabrook All Green Performance Indicators | |||
*3 Green inspection finding 6 | |||
NRC Action Matrix Licensee ResponseRegulatory Response Degraded CornerstoneMultiple Repetitive Degraded CornerstoneUnacceptable PerformanceAll Inputs are Green; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet1 or 2 White Inputs; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet2 White or 1 Yellow Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/ | |||
ModerateMultiple Yellow Inputs or 1 Red Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/ | |||
SignificantOverall Unacceptable Performance; Plants not permitted to Operatew/inthis | |||
*Increasing safety significance | |||
*IncreasingNRC inspection efforts | |||
*Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement | |||
*Increasing regulatory actions Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Degradation in Safety Performance Significant Degradation in Safety Performance Operate w/in this Column; Unacceptable Margin to Safety | |||
*Seabrook was operated safely | |||
*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix | |||
*Baselineinspectionsplannedfor2011 2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8 Seabrook Assessment MeetingU.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9 | |||
U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe*NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events | |||
*NRCrequiresadefense | |||
-in-depthapproachto NRC requires a defense indepth approach to safety*NRC performs independent safety inspections | |||
*NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10 Designed forSite Specific Natural Events*Earthquakes*Tsunamis*Hurricanes | |||
*Floods | |||
*Tornadoes 11 The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth*Redundant and diverse safety systems*Multiplephysicalbarriersto | |||
*Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material*Testing and inspection of systems important to safety*Emergency planning 12 NRC Independent Safety InspectionsReactor Oversight Program | |||
*NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security | |||
*At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant | |||
*NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13 NRC Requires Safety ImprovementsNRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements: | |||
*NRC operating experience program 14*Rulemaking (Station Blackout) | |||
*Post TMI Actions | |||
*Post 9/11 Orders | |||
*Generic Safety Issues NRC Response to Events in Japan *NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review*Near-term actions (<90 days)conductingadditional 15-conducting additional inspections-identifying near term operational issues*Longer-term actions Director's Comments Jim Clifford 16 Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I Meeting Ground Rules1.Please be respectful to the speaker -only one speaker at a time2.See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.3.NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17 Questions 18 Contacting the NRC*Report a safety concern | |||
*1-800-695-7403 | |||
*allegation@nrc.gov | |||
*General questions | |||
*www.nrc.gov | |||
*Region I Public Affairs | |||
*Diane Screnci, 610-332-5330 or diane.screnci@nrc.gov | |||
*Neil Sheehan, 610-332-5331 or neil.sheehan@nrc.gov 19}} |
Revision as of 23:22, 6 August 2018
ML111650038 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Seabrook |
Issue date: | 06/08/2011 |
From: | Burritt A L Reactor Projects Branch 3 |
To: | |
burritt al | |
References | |
Download: ML111650038 (19) | |
Text
Seabrook Station Assessment MeetingSeabrook StationSafety Performance in 2010
&&U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events2010 Reactor Oversight ProcessNuclear Regulatory Commission -Region I 1
NRC Representatives*James Clifford-Deputy Dir ector, Division of Reactor Projects*Arthur Burritt -Branch Chief *William Raymond -Senior Resident Inspector
- Jonathan Johnson -Resident Inspector 2
Agenda*Introduction*Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook*Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events*NRC to address public questions
- Closing remarks 3
- NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner thatpreserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix*Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4
- 6753hours of inspection and related activities
- 2 resident inspectors on site -residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events atanytime Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook at any time*3 major team inspections
- CDBI*Emergency Planning
- PI&R 5
- AllGreenPerformanceJanuary 1 through December 31, 2010Performance Indicator and Inspection Results Seabrook All Green Performance Indicators
- 3 Green inspection finding 6
NRC Action Matrix Licensee ResponseRegulatory Response Degraded CornerstoneMultiple Repetitive Degraded CornerstoneUnacceptable PerformanceAll Inputs are Green; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet1 or 2 White Inputs; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet2 White or 1 Yellow Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
ModerateMultiple Yellow Inputs or 1 Red Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
SignificantOverall Unacceptable Performance; Plants not permitted to Operatew/inthis
- Increasing safety significance
- IncreasingNRC inspection efforts
- Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
- Increasing regulatory actions Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Degradation in Safety Performance Significant Degradation in Safety Performance Operate w/in this Column; Unacceptable Margin to Safety
- Seabrook was operated safely
- Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
- Baselineinspectionsplannedfor2011 2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8 Seabrook Assessment MeetingU.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9
U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe*NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
- NRCrequiresadefense
-in-depthapproachto NRC requires a defense indepth approach to safety*NRC performs independent safety inspections
- NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10 Designed forSite Specific Natural Events*Earthquakes*Tsunamis*Hurricanes
- Floods
- Tornadoes 11 The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth*Redundant and diverse safety systems*Multiplephysicalbarriersto
- Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material*Testing and inspection of systems important to safety*Emergency planning 12 NRC Independent Safety InspectionsReactor Oversight Program
- NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
- At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
- NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13 NRC Requires Safety ImprovementsNRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:
- NRC operating experience program 14*Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
- Post TMI Actions
- Post 9/11 Orders
- Generic Safety Issues NRC Response to Events in Japan *NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review*Near-term actions (<90 days)conductingadditional 15-conducting additional inspections-identifying near term operational issues*Longer-term actions Director's Comments Jim Clifford 16 Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I Meeting Ground Rules1.Please be respectful to the speaker -only one speaker at a time2.See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.3.NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17 Questions 18 Contacting the NRC*Report a safety concern
- 1-800-695-7403
- allegation@nrc.gov
- General questions
- www.nrc.gov
- Region I Public Affairs
- Diane Screnci, 610-332-5330 or diane.screnci@nrc.gov
- Neil Sheehan, 610-332-5331 or neil.sheehan@nrc.gov 19