ML13177A175: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 1
| page count = 1
}}
}}
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Page 1 of 1 RULES AND DIRECTIVES SRAINU'H PUBLIC SUBMISSIONm JJM 25 AN 9: 35 Docket: NRC-2013-0063 RFCFIVED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No.Period Document:
NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-01 17 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 As of: June 25, 2013 Received:
June 03, 2013 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-85pa-bq8b Comments Due: June 03, 2013 Submission Type: Web 3; Extension of Public Comment Submitter Information
/ 3 Name: Nina Long Address: 1211 Seymour Lane Peekskill, NY, 10566 General Comment It is absurd not to make Entergy accountable for fire risks. If there is nothing to hide, and we don't all believe that no harm could ever come to this plant, then why the delays, time and time again? Why exempt the plant from scrutiny.
If everything is safe and sound, why not make it all transparent.
What have you got to lose?~SQ NJI 12eirj 6L&rjek T&,t& -ýI4DL-, Add:) fP~dcpcfJ (q up 0 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 13087d7&for...
06/25/2013}}

Latest revision as of 05:30, 14 July 2018

Comment (127) of Nina Long Opposing Entergy'S Request for Exemption from Fire-safe Federal Regulation Standards for Indian Point, Unit 3
ML13177A175
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 06/03/2013
From: Long N
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Rules, Announcements, and Directives Branch
References
78FR26662 00127, NRC-2013-0063
Download: ML13177A175 (1)


Text

Page 1 of 1 RULES AND DIRECTIVES SRAINU'H PUBLIC SUBMISSIONm JJM 25 AN 9: 35 Docket: NRC-2013-0063 RFCFIVED Draft Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact Comment On: NRC-2013-0063-0002 Entergy Nuclear Operations, Inc., Indian Point Nuclear Generating Unit No.Period Document:

NRC-2013-0063-DRAFT-01 17 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-10792 As of: June 25, 2013 Received:

June 03, 2013 Status: PendingPost Tracking No. ljx-85pa-bq8b Comments Due: June 03, 2013 Submission Type: Web 3; Extension of Public Comment Submitter Information

/ 3 Name: Nina Long Address: 1211 Seymour Lane Peekskill, NY, 10566 General Comment It is absurd not to make Entergy accountable for fire risks. If there is nothing to hide, and we don't all believe that no harm could ever come to this plant, then why the delays, time and time again? Why exempt the plant from scrutiny.

If everything is safe and sound, why not make it all transparent.

What have you got to lose?~SQ NJI 12eirj 6L&rjek T&,t& -ýI4DL-, Add:) fP~dcpcfJ (q up 0 https://www.fdms.gov/fdms-web-agency/component/contentstreamer?objectld=090000648 13087d7&for...

06/25/2013