ML15260A344: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Qu:.:.:.a:.:.:.l:.....itc.!,.y
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 Examination Outline Qu:.:.:.a:.:.:.l:.....itc.!,.y
_C:.....h:.....e:.....c:.....
_C:.....h:.....e:.....c:.....
k.:.:.li:.....s...::..t _____ =E=S=-2=0=1=-=2 Facility: Date of Examination
k.:.:.li:.....s...::..t _____ =E=S=-2=0=1=-=2 Fac ili ty: Date of Examination
: Initials Item Task Description b* c# a 1. a. Verify that the outline(s
: Initials Item T as k Description b* c# a 1. a. Verify that th e outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordan ce with ES-401. w R b. Assess whether the outline w a s systemat i cally and randomly p repar e d in accord anc e with I Section D.1 of ES-4 01 a nd wh eth er all K I A c ategories are appropr i atel y sampled. T T c. Assess whether the o ut line over-emphas i ze s any systems , evolutions , or generic topics. E N d. A ssess whether the j us t ifi c ations for deselected or rejected KIA statements are approp r iate. 2. s I M u L A T 0 R 3. w I T 4. G E N E R A L a. Using Form E S-301-5, verify tha t the proposed s c en ario sets cover the required nu mber o f normal ev o lutions , instrument and component fa ilu res , technical specifications , and major !_ransients
) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401. w R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Section D.1 of ES-401 and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled. T T c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions
_____ _ b. Asse s s whether ther e are eno ugh s c enario sets (and s pares) to test the projected number and mi x of applicants in accordance with the e x pected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity , and ensure that each applicant can be tested using (},.. at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated l from the applicants
, or generic topics. E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. 2. s I M u L A T 0 R 3. w I T 4. G E N E R A L a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications
' audit test (s}, and that scenarios will not be repeated o n subseque nt d a ys. I c. To the extent possible , a ssess whether the outline(s) c onform(s) witl1 the qualitative er I t'A A-1 , and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. vu 1 --------+---+-a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is w ith in th e lim it s speci fi ed on the fo r m (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants
, and major !_ransients
' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate p;ith, low-power, e mergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. b. Verify that the admi ni strative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: j (1) the tas k s are distributed among the topics as specified on the fo rm tV k-_ "'fn. (2) at leas t o ne task is new or significantly m o dified T ...... .,,. l (3) no mor e than one task is re peated from the last two_NRC l i cen s in g exami nat i ons_______ . c. Determi n e if there are enough di ffe rent outlines to test t he projected number and mix Q/ l. / o f and ensl!_fe items § __ re_d_u_p_li c_a_t_e_d_o_n_s_u_b_s_e __ q_u_e_nt_d_a_y_s_.
_____ _ b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity
__ ,_u_* ._.,'-'7' a. As sess w he t her plant-specific prior it ies (inc l udi ng PRA a nd IPE insights) are covered ll/ in the approp r i at e e x am sec ti ons. T CA}''? b. Asse ss wh eth er t h e 10 CF R 55.41/43 and 55.4 5 s ampling is a p p ropriat e. i L i ' ";-t ,-_ (0<oept '&deg;'
, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using (},.. at least one new or significantly modified  
p!_lorit l;;;I ''-"' 2 ,; __ J .'l' I .i..;__ d. Check fo r duplication and overlap amon_g exam sections. . 9' e. Check the en tire exam for balance o f coverage. __
: scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated l from the applicants
wh e th er t h e e xa m fits the ap p ro p r i at e j ob (R O or S RO). ___
' audit test(s}, and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. I c. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) witl1 the qualitative er I t'AA-1, and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. vu 1 --------+---+-a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants
* a. Author b. Fa cilit y R e view e r(*) c NRC C h i e f Exa miner(#) d. NR C Supervisor Note: # Indep e ndent NRC reviewer initial items i n Col u mn "c"; chi ef examiner conc u rrenc e req uir ed.
' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate p;ith, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: j (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form tV k-_ "'fn. (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified T ...... .,,. l (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two_NRC licensing examinations_______ . c. Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix Q/ l. / of and ensl!_fe items &sect; __ re_d_u_p_lic_a_t_e_d_o_n_s_u_b_s_e __ q_u_e_nt_d_a_y_s_.
* fo r NRC--prep are d ex aminat i o n outl ines !!==========================='}}
__ ,_u_* ._.,'-'7' a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered ll/ in the appropriate exam sections. T CA}''? b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. i Li ' ";-t ,-_ (0<oept '&deg;'
p!_loritl;;;I ''-"' 2 ,; __ J .'l' I .i..;__ d. Check for duplication and overlap amon_g exam sections.  
. 9' e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. __
whether the exam fits the appropriate job (RO or SRO). ___
* a. Author b. Facility Reviewer(*) c NRC Chief Examiner(#) d. NRC Supervisor Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
* for NRC--prepared examination outlines !!==========================='}}

Revision as of 23:33, 8 July 2018

2015 Duane Arnold Energy Center Initial License Examination Form ES-201-2
ML15260A344
Person / Time
Site: Duane Arnold NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 08/20/2015
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
NextEra Energy Duane Arnold
Zoia, C D
Shared Package
ML15118A361 List:
References
Download: ML15260A344 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Qu:.:.:.a:.:.:.l:.....itc.!,.y

_C:.....h:.....e:.....c:.....

k.:.:.li:.....s...::..t _____ =E=S=-2=0=1=-=2 Fac ili ty: Date of Examination

Initials Item T as k Description b* c# a 1. a. Verify that th e outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordan ce with ES-401. w R b. Assess whether the outline w a s systemat i cally and randomly p repar e d in accord anc e with I Section D.1 of ES-4 01 a nd wh eth er all K I A c ategories are appropr i atel y sampled. T T c. Assess whether the o ut line over-emphas i ze s any systems , evolutions , or generic topics. E N d. A ssess whether the j us t ifi c ations for deselected or rejected KIA statements are approp r iate. 2. s I M u L A T 0 R 3. w I T 4. G E N E R A L a. Using Form E S-301-5, verify tha t the proposed s c en ario sets cover the required nu mber o f normal ev o lutions , instrument and component fa ilu res , technical specifications , and major !_ransients

_____ _ b. Asse s s whether ther e are eno ugh s c enario sets (and s pares) to test the projected number and mi x of applicants in accordance with the e x pected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity , and ensure that each applicant can be tested using (},.. at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated l from the applicants

' audit test (s}, and that scenarios will not be repeated o n subseque nt d a ys. I c. To the extent possible , a ssess whether the outline(s) c onform(s) witl1 the qualitative er I t'A A-1 , and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. vu 1 --------+---+-a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is w ith in th e lim it s speci fi ed on the fo r m (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants

' audit test(s) (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate p;ith, low-power, e mergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on the form. b. Verify that the admi ni strative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: j (1) the tas k s are distributed among the topics as specified on the fo rm tV k-_ "'fn. (2) at leas t o ne task is new or significantly m o dified T ...... .,,. l (3) no mor e than one task is re peated from the last two_NRC l i cen s in g exami nat i ons_______ . c. Determi n e if there are enough di ffe rent outlines to test t he projected number and mix Q/ l. / o f and ensl!_fe items § __ re_d_u_p_li c_a_t_e_d_o_n_s_u_b_s_e __ q_u_e_nt_d_a_y_s_.

__ ,_u_* ._.,'-'7' a. As sess w he t her plant-specific prior it ies (inc l udi ng PRA a nd IPE insights) are covered ll/ in the approp r i at e e x am sec ti ons. T CA}? b. Asse ss wh eth er t h e 10 CF R 55.41/43 and 55.4 5 s ampling is a p p ropriat e. i L i ' ";-t ,-_ (0<oept '°'

p!_lorit l;;;I -"' 2 ,; __ J .'l' I .i..;__ d. Check fo r duplication and overlap amon_g exam sections. . 9' e. Check the en tire exam for balance o f coverage. __

wh e th er t h e e xa m fits the ap p ro p r i at e j ob (R O or S RO). ___

  • a. Author b. Fa cilit y R e view e r(*) c NRC C h i e f Exa miner(#) d. NR C Supervisor Note: # Indep e ndent NRC reviewer initial items i n Col u mn "c"; chi ef examiner conc u rrenc e req uir ed.
  • fo r NRC--prep are d ex aminat i o n outl ines !!==========================='
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15260A344&oldid=856701"