ML17229A592

Rev 0 to Procedure ADM-17.11, 10CFR500.59 Screening.

ML17229A592
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	09/18/1997
From:	SCAROLA J FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17229A591	List: ML17229A592 ML17229A593
References
ADM-17.11, NUDOCS 9801230059
Download: ML17229A592 (23)

Text

SOPSDATEDOCTPROCEDURE DOCNADM-17.11 SYSCOMPCOMPLETED ITM0FLORIDAPOWER&LIGHTg~Tpg'IP;PgA'$T

-:~QML'IrTtg+ACONTROLLED I<<~It'BEFOK uSe.PSLADM-17.11 REVISIONOPROCcDURE PRODUCTiON 10CFR50.59SCREENING ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE REVISIONREVIEWEDBYFRGON9/18/97APPROVEDBYJ.ScarolaPlantGeneralManagerDATE9/18/97PlantGeneralManagerDeartmentENGINEERING TJB6127/979801230059 980%02PoaAoaCXOSOOOSSSPPOR 1'1l REVISIONNO.:0PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:2of20ADM-17.11 ST.LUCIEPLANTTABLEOFCONTENTSSECTIONPAGE1s0PURPOSEe~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

32.0REFERENCES

.........

~..~.............

~.......~.~.~.33.0RESPONSIBILITIES

....~.....~.,~....~~~..~...~.~.~.~~.44.0DEFINITIONS

..~~..........

~..........................

55.0RECORDSREQUIRED~~....~.......~.~......,...

~.~.~,106.0INSTRUCTIONS

~~.~..~.~~.,~~~.,~....~...........,

..~116.1GeneralInformation

.......,.~~..~~.~~.~...~~~.6,210CFR50.59Screening 6.3ChangestotheFacilityorProcedures asDescribed intheSafetyAnalysisReport(SAR).........

~....~6.4Conducting aNewTestorExperiment....

~~...~....6.510CFR50.59Screening Documentation Requirements

.1113151718APPENDICES APPENDIXA10CFR50.59Screening

.~.....~...,.....

~..~~.~~~20 REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:3of20ADM-17.111.0PURPOSEST.LUCIEPLANT1.1Thisprocedure definesthe10CFR50.59screening methodology.

Anyproposedactivitythatmayinvolvemakingachangetothefacility, facilityprocedures, orconducting anewtestorexperiment shallbescreenedtodetermine ifa10CFR50.59safetyevaluation ora10CFR50.90licenseamendment isrequired, priortoimplementation.

1.2Onlythoseindividuals listedonthePSLQualified Reviewers Iist,maintained bytheTrainingDepartment, areauthorized toperforma10CFR50.59screening atPSL.

2.0REFERENCES

NOTEOneormoreofthefollowing symbolsmaybeusedinthisprocedure:

gIndicates aRegulatory commitment madebyTechnical Specifications, Condition ofLicense,Audit,LER,Bulletin, etc.,andshallNOTberevisedwithoutFacilityReviewGroupreviewandPlantGeneralManagerapproval, Indicates amanagement directive, vendorrecommendation, plantpracticeorothernon-regulatory commitment thatshouldNOTberevisedwithoutconsultation withthe.plantstaff.2.1Ql17-PR/PSL-1, QualityAssurance Records2.2AP0010124,Temporary SystemAlteration Control2.3AP0010520,FacilityReviewGroup.2.410CFR50.59,Changes,Tests,andExperiments 2.510CFR50.90,Application forAmendment ofLicenseorConstruction Permit REVISIONNO.:0PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:4of20ADM-17.11

2.0REFERENCES

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT2.6NuclearEnergyInstitute (NEI)96-07,DraftRevisionB,Guidelines for10CFR50.59SafetyEvaluations, July19972.7NuclearSafetyAnalysisCenter(NSAC)-105,Guidelines forDesignandProcedure ChangesinNuclearPowerPlants,July19862.8NuclearSafetyAnalysisCenter(NSAC)-125,Guidelines for10CFR50.59SafetyEvaluations, June19892.9NRCInspection andEnforcement Manual,Part9800(l&E9800),January1,19842.10NRCInspection andEnforcement Manual,Part9900(ChangeNotice96-008),April9,19962.'j1SECY-97-0352.12Condition Report97-14183.0RESPONSIBILITIES 3.1Engineering Manager:1.Ensurestheplant10CFR50.59screening

programs, implementing procedures, andpoliciesareconsistent withthelatestindustryandNRCscreening

'requirements.

2.Ensurestheindividuals assigned10CFR50.59screening responsibilities havesuccessfully completed therequiredtrainingandareadequately qualified, priortoaddingtheirnametotheQualified Reviewers List.3.Ensures10CFR50.59trainingisprovidedtoplantpersonnel, asnecessary.

3.2Qualified Reviewer:

VerifiesnameislistedonthesiteQualified Reviewers List,priortoperforming a10CFR50.59screening.

2.Performs10CFR50.59screening inaccordance withthisprocedure.

REVISIONNO.:0PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:5of20ADM-17.11ST.LUCIEPLANT3.0RESPONSIBILITIES (continued) 3.3TrainingDepartment:

Maintains theMastercopyoftheQualified Reviewers listandensuresallrevisions aredistributed toeachDepartment Manager,Unit1and2ControlRooms,andSiteDocumentControl.4.0DEFINITIONS 4.1AppendixBtotheOperating LicenseThelatestapprovedfacilityEnvironmental Protection Plan.ReviewofAppendixBensurestheproposedactivitydoesNOTinvolvethepotential foradverseenvironmental impactsuchashazardous materials beingdispersed totheenvironment.

4.2ChangesintheFacility:

Anychangeinthefacilitywhichaltersthedesign,function, ormethodofperforming thefunctionofacomponent, system,orstructure described intheSAR.Thisappliestocomponents, systems,andstructures described eitherinthewrittenportionoftheSARorinthedrawingscontained therein.4.3ChangesinProcedures:

PertainsNOTonlytoprocedures discussed intheinitialoperations andorganizational chaptersoftheSAR,butalsotootherprocedural-type commitments, suchasthemodesandsequences ofplantoperation described intheSAR,etc.Ifaprocedure resultsinadeviation fromthestepslistedintheSARorwillresultinasystemoperation whichdeviatesfromthewaythatasystemisdescribed intheSAR,thenthechangeisconsidered achangeinprocedures.

4,4ChangestotheTechnical Specifications orOperating License:AchangetotheTechnical Specifications orOperating Licenseincludesanychangeofinstructions, values,orintent,including administrative changes.

REVISIONNO.:0PROCEDURE No.:ADM-17.11PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:6of204.0DEFINITIONS (continued) 4.5Facility:

Thefacilityisdefinedasthosestructures, systems,andcomponents withintheboundaryoftheSt.LuciePlantsite.ThisincludesbutisNOTlimitedtothecontainment

building, thepowerblock,theswitchyard, theparkinglots,themangroves, thesanddunes,thewarehouses, etc.4.6NRCSafetyEvaluation Reports(SERs)NRCSafetyEvaluation Reportswereinitially issuedinsupportofobtaining operating licenseapproval.

Subsequent toobtaining theoperating license,additional SERshavebeenissuedinsupportoflicenseamendments.

Currently, exceptforthoseSER'srecentlyissuedbytheNRC,aQualified Reviewercantypically assumetherelev'ant portionsofallSER'shavebeenincorporated intotheUFSARviatheupdateprocess.4.7Operating License(OL)TheOperating Licenseisthelicense,andconditions asamended,grantedbytheNRCforoperation oftheunit.ThereisanOperating LicenseforeachSt.LuciePlantunit.4.8PassiveActivity:

AnyactivitythatdoesNOTmeetthedefinedconditions ofaProposedActivity(i.e.,doesNOTinvolveachangetothefacility, doesNO7changeafacilityprocedure, anddoesNOTinvolveanewtestorexperiment).

Activities typically considered passiveincludecleaning, lubrication,

painting, like-for-like equipment change-out, electronic monitoring, equipment testing,andadministrative corrections madeinaccordance withQl-5-PSL-1, Preparation,

Revision, Review/Approval ofprocedures.

Passiveactivities areNOTrequiredtobescreened.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:7of20ADM-17.114.0DEFINITIONS (continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT4.9Procedures:

FRGreviewedandPGMapproveddocuments thatprovideinstructions regarding theoperation, maintenance, andtestingofthefacility.

ThisincludesbutisNOTlimitedtothefollowing documents:

QualityInstructions 2.Administrative procedures 3.Operating procedures 4.Off-normal procedures 5.Emergency procedures 6.Testprocedures 7.Calibration procedures 8.Maintenance procedures 9.Annunciator Responseprocedures

'0.Chemistry procedures HealthPhysicsprocedures 12.Surveillance procedures 13.LettersofInstruction 14.In-Service PressureTestPackages'I5.PortionsofTechnical ManualsUsedAsApprovedProcedures.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE No.:ADM-17.11 PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:Sof204.0DEFINITIONS (continued) 4.10ProposedActivity:

Anyactivity(i.e.,change,test,orexperiment) thatmayinvolveeitherchangingthefacility, orchangingfacilityprocedures, orconducting anewfacilitytestorexperiment.

Examplesofactivities thattypically wouldrequirescreening includewelding,re-wiring, equipment setpointchanges,modifications toSystems,Structures orComponents (SSCs),operating changestoequipment andsystems.Changestothefacilityorchangestofacilityprocedures includebothtemporary andpermanent changes.4.11Qualified Reviewer:

1.Anypersonthatmeetsthe10CFR50.59screening trainingrequirements, possesses therequisite experience tocompetently analyzetheproposedchange/activity, andisauthorized bytheEngineering Manager(i.e.,nameisonthePSLQualified Reviewers List).2.ThePSLlistofQualified Reviewers ismaintained bytheTrainingDepartment.

4.12SafetyAnalysisReport(SAR)TheNRCgrantsalicensetooperateanuclearpowerplantfacilitybasedoninformation providedbythelicensee.

Forthepurposesof10CFR50.59screening, theSARisconsidered toincludethefollowing documents:

A.Technical Specification BASESB.UpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR)C.NRCSafetyEvaluation Reports(SER's)D.AppendixBtotheOperating License2.PerSECY-97-035, theSARdoesNOThavetobeconsidered toincludetheradiological emergency plan,securityplan,ortheAppendixBprogram,sincechangestotheseprogramsarecoveredby10CFR50.54.

REVISIONNO.:0PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:9of20ADM-17.114.0DEFINITIONS (continued) 4.13Screening Criteria:

ST.LUCIEPLANTDoestheproposedactivityinvolvechangestotheTechnical Specification orOperating License?2.Doestheproposedactivityinvolvemakingchangestothefacilityorprocedures asdescribed intheSAR?3.Doestheproposedactivityinvolveatestorexperiment NOTdescribed intheSAR?4.14SupportActivity:

Anyactivityperformed indirectsupportof,orforthesolepurposeof,supporting anotheractivity, Eachsupportactivitymustbeconsidered onacase-by-case basiswhendetermining ifa10CFR50.59screening isrequired.

Supportactivities suchasscaffolding, temporary changestosystemsorprocedures, etc.mayNOTmeetthedefinedconditions ofaPassiveActivity(i,e.,mayinvolveeitherachangetothefacility, achangetofacilityprocedures, orinvolveanewfacilitytestorexperiment),

4.15Technical Requirements ManualThecontrolled documentthatcontainscopiesofapprovedtechnical specification amendments removingrequirements fromtheSt,Lucietechnical specifications.

4.16Technical Specifications (TS's)TheTechnical Specifications identifytheplant'sLimitingSafetySystemSettings, LimitingConditions forOperation, Surveillance Requirements, DesignFeatures, andAdministrative Requirements.

Includedineachunit'sTS'saretheBASESorsummarystatements, thatprovidethereasonforTSrequirements.

REVISIONNo.:0PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:10of20ADM-17.114.0DEFINITIONS (continued}

ST.LUCIEPLANT4.17TestsandExperiments Pertainstotheperformance oftestsorexperiments thatmayaffectthesafeoperation oftheplantbutwereNOTdescribed intheSAR.Byregulatory definition, thesearetestsandexperiments whichcouldpotentially degradethemarginsofsafetyduringnormaloperations oranticipated transients ordegradetheadequacyofstructures, systems,orcomponents topreventaccidents ormitigateaccidentconditions.

4.18UpdatedFinalSafetyAnalysisReport(UFSAR)TheUFSARincludesthedescription ofthefacility, procedures, tests,experiments, supporting

analysis, andevaluations, usedbytheNRCinitsapprovalprocesstogranttheoperating license,andallchangesapprovedinaccordance with10CFR50.59and10CFR50.90.NotethatchangestotheUFSARarerequiredtobesubmitted totheNRCwithinsixmonthsfollowing refueling outagesNOTtoexceed2yearssincethelastupdate.Forthepurposesofscreening, theUFSARencompasses allchangesapprovedincluding thoseNOTyetphysically incorporated intothepagesoftheUFSAR.4.1910CFR50.59Screening:

Thedocumented analysisofaproposedactivity, priortoimplementation, todetermine ifa10CFR50.59safetyevaiuation ora10CFR50.90licenseamendment isrequired.

6.0RECORDSREQUIRED6.'1Thefollowing recordsshallbemaintained intheplantfilesinaccordance withQl17-PR/PSL-1, QualityAssurance Records:AppendixA REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:PROCEDURE No.:ADM-17.11

6.0 INSTRUCTIONS

ST.LUCIEPLANT11of206.1GeneralInformation 1.The10CFR50.59screening isdesignedtodetermine anddocumentifa10CFR50.59safetyevaluation ora10CFR50.90licenseamendment isrequired, priortoimplementing aproposedactivity.

A.Itisconsidered prudenttobeconservative whendetermining ifasafetyevaluation orlicenseamendment isrequired, Ifitisunclear,whethertheproposedactivityrequiresasafetyevaluation orlicense'amendment, thedefaultshouldbetoobtainanEngineering review.B.Screening resultsmustbecleariydocumented insufficient detailtopermitanindependent reviewertoreconstruct thebasisfortheoriginalreviewer's disposition.

C.Whenscreening aproposedactivity, theintermediate plantconfigurations duringimplementation shallbeconsidered.

2.Onlythoseindividuals thatmeetthe10CFR50.59trainingrequirements andauthorized bytheEngineering Manager(i.e.,nameisonthePSLQualified Reviewers List)arepermitted toperforma10CFR50.59screening.

ThePSLQualified Reviewers Listismaintained bytheTrainingDepartment.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:12of20ADM-17.11

6.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT6.1GeneralInformation (continued) 3.Inaccordance withfederalregulations, theUFSARisamendedevery18monthstoincludethemostrecentchanges.Accordingly, thecurrentamendment oftheUFSARmaynotreflectapprovedchangesthatareupto18monthsold.ThislaginamendingtheUFSARisofparticular concerninthecaseofLicenseamendments thatrelocatematerialfromthetechnical specifications totheUFSAR,Inthiscaseareviewofthetechnical specifications andcurrentamendment oftheUFSARwouldnotidentifythatthesubjectmaterialwasdescribed intheSAR.Toaddressthisconcern,reviewers performing 10CFR50.59screening mustreviewthePSLTechnical Requirements manual~Thiscontrolled documentcontainscopiesofapprovedlicenseamendments thathaverelocated technical specification requirements totheUFSAR.Allformertechnical specification requirements thathavebeenapprovedtoberelocated totheUFSAR(regardless ofwhetherthesechangesarephysically contained inthecurrentUFSARamendment) mustbeconsidered tobepartoftheSARforthepurposesof10CFR50.59screening.

ENDOFSECTION6.1 REVISIONNo.:0PROCEDURE No.:ADM-17.11 PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:13of206.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 6.210CFR50.59Screening A10CFR50.59screening isaccomplished by:A.Askingthefollowing questions (orwordsofasimilarintent)concurrent withthereviewoftheTechnical Specifications, Operating License,andSafetyAnalysisReport:Question1:DoestheproposedactivityinvolvechangestotheTechnical Specifications orOperating License?2.Question2:Doestheproposedactivityinvolvemakingchangestothefacilityorprocedures asdescribed intheSAR?3.Question3:Doestheproposedactivityinvolveconducting testsorexperiments NOTdescribed intheSAR?B.Documenting 10CFR50.59screening resultsandassociated supporting references onaformsimilartoAppendixA.2.Theresponses totheabovequestions willdetermine thetypeofevaluation andapprovalrequired, PRIORtoimplementing theproposedactivity:

A.IftheresponsetoQuestion1isYES:1.TheactivitycanNOTbeperformed underthe10CFR50.59process.2.A10CFR50.90licenseamendment andNRCapprovalisrequired, priortoimplementing theproposedchange.Literally, nochangecanbemadetoTechnical Specifications ortheOperating LicensewithoutpriorNRCapproval..

Evenseemingly minoreditorial changesmustbesubmitted asaProposedLicenseAmendment.

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE NO.:ADM-17.11 PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:14of206.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 6.210CFR50.59Screening (continued) 2.(continued)

B.IftheresponsetoQuestion1isNO,andeitherQuestion2orQuestion3isYES,a10CFR50.59safetyevaluation isrequiredtodetermine ifpriorNRCapprovalisrequiredforimplementation oftheproposedactivity.

C.Iftheresponses toQuestion1,Question2,andQuestion3areNO,neitheralicenseamendment norasafetyevaluation isrequiredforimplementation oftheproposedactivity.

Aproposedactivityisconsidered successfully screenedwhentheresponses toallthreequestions areNO.ENDOFSECTION6.2 REVISIONNO.:0PROCEDURE NO.:ADM-17.11 PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:15of206.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 6.3ChangestotheFacilityorProcedures asDescribed intheSafetyAnalysisReport(SAR)IftheSARtext,tables,orfigurescontainsufficient detailregarding astructure, system,component, orprocedure suchthatitcanbereasonably concluded thattheproposedactivityrepresents achangetothatdetail,itisconsidered tobeachangetothefacilityorprocedures asdescribed intheSAR.2.Iftheanalysisoftheproposedactivityconcludes thatotherstructures, systems,components orprocedures described intheSARareNOTdirectlyrelatedtothechangebutmaybeadversely

affected, thenitisconsidered tobeachangetothefacilityorprocedures asdescribed intheSAR.3.Inreviewing theSAR,itiscommontofindtheproposedactivitybeingreviewedinseveralsections.

Whenthisoccurs,itisimportant toanalyzeeachapplicable sectionagainsttheproposedactivityanddrawaconclusion regarding theoverallaffectontheSAR.A.Whenanalyzing morethanonesectionoftheSARagainstaproposedactivity, itmaybeusefultocharacterize theaffect(s) oneachsectionoftheSARintothefollowing categories anddrawanoverallconclusion:

1.POSITIVEAFFECT-Theproposedactivityisconsidered achangetothefacilityorprocedures asdescribed intheSAR,2.NEUTRALAFFECT-TheSARdescription doesNOTprovidesufficient detailtoconcludethattheproposedactivityisachange.3.NEGATIVEAFFECT-TheproposedactivityisNOTconsidered achangetothefacilityorprocedures asdescribed intheSAR.

REVISIONNO.:PROCEDURE NO.:ADM-17.11PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:16of206.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 6.3ChangestotheFacilityorProcedures asDescribed intheSafetyAnalysisReport(SAR)(continued) 3.(continued)

B.Whenanalyzing morethanonesectionoftheSARagainstaproposedchange,thefinalconclusion shouldbebasedondiscounting theneutralaffect(s) andcomparing thepositiveaffect(s) withthenegativeaffect(s).

ENDOFSECTlON6.3 REVISIONNO.:0PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:17of20AOM-17.11

6.0 INSTRUCTIONS

(continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT6.4Conducting aNewTestorExperiment 1.IfafteranalysisoftheSARtext,tables,andfiguresitcanNOTbereasonably concluded thatthetestorexperiment isadequately described intheSAR,thentheproposedactivityisconsidered conducting anewtestorexperiment, 2.Thescopeofconducting anewtestorexperiment doesNOTincludethefollowing typeoftestsorexperiments:

A.Minortestsorexperiments performed forconvenience withinthePSLsiteboundaries (e.g.,testingpHofintakewater);B.ThosethatdoNOTinvolveoraffectthefacilityoritsprocedures.

3.Changestopreviously evaluated testsorexperiments currently identified inexistingplantprocedures areNOTconsidered newtestsorexperiments, providedthetestsorexperiments aregovernedbythesameconditions aspreviously evaluated.

Thesetypesofchangesshallbescreenedasprocedure changes.ENDOFSECTION6A REVISIONNo.:0PROCEDURE NO.:PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING PAGE:18of20ADM-17.116.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued)

ST.LUCIEPLANT6.510CFR50.59Screening Documentation Requirements 1.Thebasisforthe10CFR50.59screening conclusion shallbedocumented suchthatanindependent qualified reviewercouldreachthesameconclusion basedsolelyontheidentified references anddocumented information.

ThisincludesbutisNOTlimitedto:A.Identifying thesignificantlpertinent section(s) oftheUFSAR,Operating License,andTechnical Specifications.

B.Documenting and,whenpossible, quantifying theuseofexperience orengineering judgement.

C.Identifying otherrelevantinformation, whenapplicable.

2.Thequalified reviewershouldavoidtheinclination tosupportaNOanswerbysimplyreversing thewordorderofthequestionsuchthatitbecomesasimplestatement ofconclusion ratherthanabasisexplanation.

A.Following aresometypicalexamplesofsuggested basisstatements thatmaybeusedwhenneithera10CFR50.59safetyevaluation nora10CFR50.90licenseamendment isrequired:

1.Ifchangestothefacilityorfacilityprocedures areinvolved:

a.TheTechnical Specifications, Operating License,andSARdocuments havebeenreviewedandreference tothestructures, systems,components, andprocedures involvedwiththeproposedactivity(oritseffects)canNOTbefoundinthefollowing section(s),

table(s),

orfigure(s)

REVISIONNo.:PROCEDURE NO.:ADM-17.11 PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING ST.LUCIEPLANTPAGE:19of206.0INSTRUCTIONS (continued) 6.510CFR50.59Screening Documentation Requirements 2.(continued)

A.(continued) 1.(continued) b.TheTechnical Specifications, Operating License,andSARdocuments havebeenreviewed, andreference tothestructures, systems,components, andprocedures involvedwiththeproposedactivity(oritseffects)werefoundinthefollowing section(s),

table(s),

orfigure(s)

,Itisthejudgement ofthereviewerthatthesereferences whencomparedtotheproposedactivity, doNOTrepresent achangetothefacilityorafacilityprocedure.

2.Ifanewfacilitytestorexperiment isinvolved:

a.Uponanalysisofthefollowing Technical Specifications, Operating License,andSARsection(s),

table(s),

orfigure(s),

thenewfacilitytest/experiment isjudgedbythereviewertobeadequately described intheSARandisNOTconsidered conducting anewtestorexperiment.

ENDOFSECTION6.5 REVISIONNO:PROCEDURE NO.:ADM-17.11 PROCEDURE TITLE:10CFR50.59SCREENING ST.LUCIEPLANTAPPENDIXA10CFR50.59SCREENlNG (Page1of1}PAGE:20of20FSARSection(s),

Table(s)orFigurefs)

Reviewed:

Technical Specification SectionsReviewedThefollowing questions shallbecompleted inaccordance withO-ADM-17.11, 10CFR50.59Screening:

YESNOA.DoestheproposedactivityinvolvechangestotheTechnical Specifications orOperating License?B.Doestheproposedactivityinvolvemakingchangestothefacilityorprocedures asdescribed intheSAR?C.Doestheproposedactivityinvolveconducting testsorexperiments NOTdescribed intheSAR?Notes:1.AYESanswertoQuestionAmandatesaf0CFR50.90licenseamendment andNRCapproval, priortoimplementing theproposedactivity.

2.AYESanswertoQuestionBorCmandatesa$0CFR50.59safelyevaluation, priortoimplementing theproposedactivity.

3.IfallanswersareNO,aSafetyEvaluation isNOTrequired.

ProvideWrittenDiscussion Supporting Checklist Responses:

(Attachadditional pages,asnecessary)

ReviewedBy:Signature PrintNameDeptDateUponcompletion, thispageshallbeinsertedintoandremainwithitsassociated documentation packagethroughout thepackagereviewandapprovalprocess.ENDOFAPPENDlXA I