ML17249A371: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = E-Mail | | document type = E-Mail | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| project = | |||
| stage = Acceptance Review | |||
}} | |||
=Text= | |||
{{#Wiki_filter:1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Regner, LisaSent:Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:16 AMTo:Paul.Duke@pseg.comCc:Regner, Lisa | |||
==Subject:== | |||
NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124)Paul, By letter dated August 17, 2017, PSEG Nuclear, the licensee for Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station, submitted a request for relief to use a later edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code that, if approved, would allow the licensee to use the 2012 Edition for the fourth inservice testing interval for Hope Creek. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request (RR). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed RR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. Based on the information provided in your request, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of December 20, 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager. | |||
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, or unanticipated addition of scope to the review. If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906. Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3713 Mail Envelope Properties (1fff372df3e5400883303818745b9314) | |||
==Subject:== | |||
NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124) Sent Date: 9/6/2017 11:15:44 AM Received Date: 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients: "Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Paul.Duke@pseg.com" <Paul.Duke@pseg.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2931 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: | |||
}} | }} |
Revision as of 09:11, 25 April 2018
ML17249A371 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Hope Creek |
Issue date: | 09/06/2017 |
From: | Regner L M Plant Licensing Branch IV |
To: | Duke P R Public Service Enterprise Group |
References | |
MG0124 | |
Download: ML17249A371 (2) | |
Text
1NRR-PMDAPEm ResourceFrom:Regner, LisaSent:Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:16 AMTo:Paul.Duke@pseg.comCc:Regner, Lisa
Subject:
NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124)Paul, By letter dated August 17, 2017, PSEG Nuclear, the licensee for Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station, submitted a request for relief to use a later edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code that, if approved, would allow the licensee to use the 2012 Edition for the fourth inservice testing interval for Hope Creek. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request (RR). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed RR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence. Based on the information provided in your request, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of December 20, 2017. If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.
These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, or unanticipated addition of scope to the review. If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906. Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3713 Mail Envelope Properties (1fff372df3e5400883303818745b9314)
Subject:
NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124) Sent Date: 9/6/2017 11:15:44 AM Received Date: 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients: "Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Paul.Duke@pseg.com" <Paul.Duke@pseg.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2931 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: