Information Notice 2010-04, Diesel Generator Voltage Regulation System Component Due to Latent Manufacturing Defect: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 5 | | page count = 5 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | {{#Wiki_filter:ML093340392 UNITED STATES | ||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS | OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS | ||
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 February 26, 2010 | WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 | ||
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2010-04: | |||
February 26, 2010 | |||
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2010-04: | |||
DIESEL GENERATOR VOLTAGE REGULATION | |||
SYSTEM COMPONENT DUE TO LATENT | SYSTEM COMPONENT DUE TO LATENT | ||
| Line 51: | Line 55: | ||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to alert | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to alert | ||
addressees to possible latent manufacturing defects in emergency diesel generator (EDG) | addressees to possible latent manufacturing defects in emergency diesel generator (EDG) | ||
voltage regulation components. The NRC expects that recipients will review the information for | voltage regulation components. The NRC expects that recipients will review the information for | ||
applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. | applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. | ||
| Line 65: | Line 69: | ||
Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2, the train A EDG tripped on a generator differential | Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2, the train A EDG tripped on a generator differential | ||
protective relay trip shortly after paralleling it to offsite power. The licensee declared the EDG | protective relay trip shortly after paralleling it to offsite power. The licensee declared the EDG | ||
inoperable. | inoperable. | ||
| Line 71: | Line 75: | ||
Licensee troubleshooting revealed damage to the excitation control system for the generator on | Licensee troubleshooting revealed damage to the excitation control system for the generator on | ||
one of the three phase alternating current voltage inputs to the rectifier bridge. The damaged | one of the three phase alternating current voltage inputs to the rectifier bridge. The damaged | ||
electrical component was found to be the C phase linear power reactor. A linear power reactor | electrical component was found to be the C phase linear power reactor. A linear power reactor | ||
is an electrical component consisting of a magnetic coil (inductor). The linear power reactor | is an electrical component consisting of a magnetic coil (inductor). The linear power reactor | ||
function is to limit the magnitude of the current through the excitation bridge, which supplies the | function is to limit the magnitude of the current through the excitation bridge, which supplies the | ||
generator field during operation. The licensee inspection of the failed magnetic coil found burnt | generator field during operation. The licensee inspection of the failed magnetic coil found burnt and charred copper conductors and insulation materials. No additional electrical components in | ||
and charred copper conductors and insulation materials. No additional electrical components in | |||
the cabinet were found damaged or operating out of specifications. Troubleshooting also | the cabinet were found damaged or operating out of specifications. Troubleshooting also | ||
revealed that the failure was isolated to this component and not caused by any other component | revealed that the failure was isolated to this component and not caused by any other component | ||
| Line 91: | Line 93: | ||
The licensee sent the failed linear power reactor to an external laboratory for an equipment | The licensee sent the failed linear power reactor to an external laboratory for an equipment | ||
failure analysis. The analysis determined the cause of the component failure to be a latent | failure analysis. The analysis determined the cause of the component failure to be a latent | ||
manufacturing defect. An iron core lamination was slightly out of alignment with the other | manufacturing defect. An iron core lamination was slightly out of alignment with the other | ||
laminations in the transformers E core assembly. The slight misalignment created a sharp, thin metal edge that, coincident with existing lamination vibration, slowly cut into and degraded | laminations in the transformers E core assembly. The slight misalignment created a sharp, thin metal edge that, coincident with existing lamination vibration, slowly cut into and degraded | ||
the internal insulation around the coil wire. The internal insulation was found to be cut/worn | the internal insulation around the coil wire. The internal insulation was found to be cut/worn | ||
below the required voltage withstand level resulting in a winding-to-winding fault. The high fault | below the required voltage withstand level resulting in a winding-to-winding fault. The high fault | ||
current caused very high temperatures and melting of the copper windings. Due to the relatively | current caused very high temperatures and melting of the copper windings. Due to the relatively | ||
small amount of run time (approximately 3000 hours) on the EDG, the insulation degradation | small amount of run time (approximately 3000 hours) on the EDG, the insulation degradation | ||
developed slowly over a period of approximately 25 years. Manufacturing defects normally | developed slowly over a period of approximately 25 years. Manufacturing defects normally | ||
manifest as an early failure, however the limited actual in-service energized time of the EDG | manifest as an early failure, however the limited actual in-service energized time of the EDG | ||
delayed the appearance of the defect. However, once a coil winding-to-winding fault develops, it is postulated that it grows quickly, resulting in sudden component failure in a relatively short | delayed the appearance of the defect. However, once a coil winding-to-winding fault develops, it is postulated that it grows quickly, resulting in sudden component failure in a relatively short | ||
period of time. | period of time. | ||
Palo Verde licensee corrective actions include the following: | Palo Verde licensee corrective actions include the following: | ||
* Adding a preventive maintenance task for thermography of EDG excitation system silicon | * Adding a preventive maintenance task for thermography of EDG excitation system silicon | ||
| Line 119: | Line 121: | ||
controlled bridge rectifiers, power diode bridge rectifiers, current transformers, power | controlled bridge rectifiers, power diode bridge rectifiers, current transformers, power | ||
transformers, and linear reactors. Additionally, performing these new thermography surveys | transformers, and linear reactors. Additionally, performing these new thermography surveys | ||
may necessitate a plant modification to install new viewing ports for safely performing | may necessitate a plant modification to install new viewing ports for safely performing | ||
| Line 135: | Line 137: | ||
detect degrading insulation integrity. | detect degrading insulation integrity. | ||
* Periodically replacing some power magnetic components based on service time. Availability | * Periodically replacing some power magnetic components based on service time. Availability | ||
of spares for the excitation system components can increase EDG availability. | of spares for the excitation system components can increase EDG availability. | ||
Other actions to be considered by licensees may include: | Other actions to be considered by licensees may include: | ||
* Performing visual inspections for burn marks on the linear power reactors, conductors, cabinet and electrical connections. | * Performing visual inspections for burn marks on the linear power reactors, conductors, cabinet and electrical connections. | ||
| Line 158: | Line 160: | ||
The licensee's preventive maintenance strategy included a visual inspection and cleaning at a | The licensee's preventive maintenance strategy included a visual inspection and cleaning at a | ||
frequency of once every three fuel cycles. The visual inspection was non-intrusive and would | frequency of once every three fuel cycles. The visual inspection was non-intrusive and would | ||
not reveal latent manufacturing defects. There are no vendor recommendations that specify | not reveal latent manufacturing defects. There are no vendor recommendations that specify | ||
predictive maintenance to identify degrading magnetic components prior to failure. | predictive maintenance to identify degrading magnetic components prior to failure. | ||
| Line 172: | Line 174: | ||
Reviews by the licensee and the NRC revealed past industry experience with degraded voltage | Reviews by the licensee and the NRC revealed past industry experience with degraded voltage | ||
regulation magnetic components. However, these prior events did not conduct detailed | regulation magnetic components. However, these prior events did not conduct detailed | ||
laboratory analyses to determine the failure mechanisms. In most cases, the failures were | laboratory analyses to determine the failure mechanisms. In most cases, the failures were | ||
attributed to age related degradation. However, the DuPont Nomex insulation material used for | attributed to age related degradation. However, the DuPont Nomex insulation material used for | ||
the linear reactor coils was found to be rated for an extended life while in service up to | the linear reactor coils was found to be rated for an extended life while in service up to | ||
428 degrees Fahrenheit (220 degrees Celsius). In this case, the manufacturing defect was | 428 degrees Fahrenheit (220 degrees Celsius). In this case, the manufacturing defect was | ||
attributed to poor workmanship and assembly techniques during original component | attributed to poor workmanship and assembly techniques during original component | ||
construction. The failed component was originally assembled in the 1970s and installed in the | construction. The failed component was originally assembled in the 1970s and installed in the | ||
1980s. The defect went undetected until its ultimate failure under loaded conditions. The | 1980s. The defect went undetected until its ultimate failure under loaded conditions. The | ||
relatively small amount of run time on the EDGs, over several years, facilitates characterizing | relatively small amount of run time on the EDGs, over several years, facilitates characterizing | ||
| Line 197: | Line 199: | ||
S | S | ||
This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this | This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this | ||
matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor | matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor | ||
| Line 203: | Line 205: | ||
Regulation project manager. | Regulation project manager. | ||
/RA/ | /RA/ | ||
Timothy J. McGinty, Director | |||
/RA by MTschiltz for/ | |||
Timothy J. McGinty, Director | |||
Daniel H. Dorman, Director | |||
Division of Policy and Rulemaking | |||
Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | |||
/RA/ | |||
Glenn Tracy, Director | |||
Division of Construction Inspection | Division of Construction Inspection | ||
and Operational Programs | and Operational Programs | ||
Office of New Reactors | |||
Technical Contacts: | |||
Technical Contacts: Joseph Bashore | |||
Prem Sahay | |||
623-393-3737 | |||
301-415-8439 | |||
E-mail: Joseph.Bashore@nrc.gov email: Prem.Sahay@nrc.gov | |||
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections. | Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections. | ||
==CONTACT== | ==CONTACT== | ||
S | S | ||
This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this | This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this | ||
matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor | matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor | ||
| Line 233: | Line 252: | ||
Regulation project manager. | Regulation project manager. | ||
/RA/ | /RA/ | ||
Timothy J. McGinty, Director | |||
/RA by MTschiltz for/ | |||
Timothy J. McGinty, Director | |||
Daniel H. Dorman, Director | |||
Division of Policy and Rulemaking | |||
Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards | |||
/RA/ | |||
Glenn Tracy, Director | |||
Division of Construction Inspection | Division of Construction Inspection | ||
and Operational Programs | and Operational Programs | ||
Office of New Reactors | |||
Technical Contacts: | |||
Technical Contacts: Joseph Bashore | |||
Prem Sahay | |||
623-393-3737 | |||
301-415-8439 | |||
E-mail: Joseph.Bashore@nrc.gov email: Prem.Sahay@nrc.gov | |||
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections. | |||
ADAMS Accession Number: ML093340392 | |||
ME2313 OFFICE | |||
EEEB:DE | |||
Tech Editor | |||
BC:EEB:DE:NRO BC:EEEB:DE D:DE | |||
NAME | |||
PSahay | |||
KAzariah-Kribbs APal | |||
GWilson | |||
PHiland | |||
DATE | |||
01/19/2010 | |||
12/15/09 email | |||
01/20/2010 email | |||
01/20/2010 | |||
01/25/2010 | |||
OFFICE | |||
PGCB:DPR | |||
PGCB:DPR | |||
BC:PGCB:DPR | |||
D:DCIP:NRO | |||
D:FCSS:NMSS D:DPR | |||
NAME | |||
DBeaulieu | |||
CHawes | |||
MMurphy | |||
GTracy | |||
DDorman | |||
(MTschitlz for) | |||
TMcGinty | |||
DATE | |||
01/26/10 | |||
01/27/10 | |||
01/27/10 | |||
02/23/10 | |||
02/26/10 | |||
02/26/10 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} | |||
{{Information notice-Nav}} | {{Information notice-Nav}} | ||
Latest revision as of 09:03, 14 January 2025
| ML093340392 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/26/2010 |
| From: | Dan Dorman, Mcginty T, Tracy G NRC/NMSS/FCSS, Division of Construction Inspection and Operational Programs, Division of Policy and Rulemaking |
| To: | |
| Beaulieu, D P, NRR/DPR, 415-3243 | |
| References | |
| IN-10-004 | |
| Download: ML093340392 (5) | |
ML093340392 UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
OFFICE OF NEW REACTORS
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001
February 26, 2010
NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2010-04:
DIESEL GENERATOR VOLTAGE REGULATION
SYSTEM COMPONENT DUE TO LATENT
MANUFACTURING DEFECT
ADDRESSEES
All holders of an operating license or construction permit for a nuclear power reactor issued
under Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, Domestic Licensing of
Production and Utilization Facilities, except those who have permanently ceased operations
and have certified that fuel has been permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
All holders of or applicants for an early site permit, standard design certification, standard
design approval, manufacturing license, or combined license issued under 10 CFR Part 52, Licenses, Certifications, and Approvals for Nuclear Power Plants.
All holders of or applicants for a license for a fuel cycle facility issued pursuant to
10 CFR Part 70, Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material.
PURPOSE
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to alert
addressees to possible latent manufacturing defects in emergency diesel generator (EDG)
voltage regulation components. The NRC expects that recipients will review the information for
applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.
Suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or
written response is required.
DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES
On November 12, 2008, during the performance of a monthly surveillance test at Palo Verde
Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2, the train A EDG tripped on a generator differential
protective relay trip shortly after paralleling it to offsite power. The licensee declared the EDG
Licensee troubleshooting revealed damage to the excitation control system for the generator on
one of the three phase alternating current voltage inputs to the rectifier bridge. The damaged
electrical component was found to be the C phase linear power reactor. A linear power reactor
is an electrical component consisting of a magnetic coil (inductor). The linear power reactor
function is to limit the magnitude of the current through the excitation bridge, which supplies the
generator field during operation. The licensee inspection of the failed magnetic coil found burnt and charred copper conductors and insulation materials. No additional electrical components in
the cabinet were found damaged or operating out of specifications. Troubleshooting also
revealed that the failure was isolated to this component and not caused by any other component
in the voltage regulation system.
The licensee sent the failed linear power reactor to an external laboratory for an equipment
failure analysis. The analysis determined the cause of the component failure to be a latent
manufacturing defect. An iron core lamination was slightly out of alignment with the other
laminations in the transformers E core assembly. The slight misalignment created a sharp, thin metal edge that, coincident with existing lamination vibration, slowly cut into and degraded
the internal insulation around the coil wire. The internal insulation was found to be cut/worn
below the required voltage withstand level resulting in a winding-to-winding fault. The high fault
current caused very high temperatures and melting of the copper windings. Due to the relatively
small amount of run time (approximately 3000 hours0.0347 days <br />0.833 hours <br />0.00496 weeks <br />0.00114 months <br />) on the EDG, the insulation degradation
developed slowly over a period of approximately 25 years. Manufacturing defects normally
manifest as an early failure, however the limited actual in-service energized time of the EDG
delayed the appearance of the defect. However, once a coil winding-to-winding fault develops, it is postulated that it grows quickly, resulting in sudden component failure in a relatively short
period of time.
Palo Verde licensee corrective actions include the following:
- Adding a preventive maintenance task for thermography of EDG excitation system silicon
controlled bridge rectifiers, power diode bridge rectifiers, current transformers, power
transformers, and linear reactors. Additionally, performing these new thermography surveys
may necessitate a plant modification to install new viewing ports for safely performing
thermography in difficult locations similar to the cabinet housing the linear power reactors.
- Using a data recorder to capture various EDG parameters during startup and provide
trending for troubleshooting can enhance the licensees corrective action program.
- Inspecting linear power reactors for signs of defects such as observing splits in the
laminated windings of the transformers E core and by performing surge/meggar testing to
detect degrading insulation integrity.
- Periodically replacing some power magnetic components based on service time. Availability
of spares for the excitation system components can increase EDG availability.
Other actions to be considered by licensees may include:
- Performing visual inspections for burn marks on the linear power reactors, conductors, cabinet and electrical connections.
- Incorporating into plant maintenance procedures the industry's preventive maintenance
recommendations contained in Technical Report/Maintenance Guide for the individual
voltage regulator model.
DISCUSSION
This IN describes the failure of a linear power reactor in an EDG voltage regulation system at
plant where the licensees preventive maintenance program did not address the EDG excitation
system magnetic components that can be subject to deterioration with age or time in service.
The licensee's preventive maintenance strategy included a visual inspection and cleaning at a
frequency of once every three fuel cycles. The visual inspection was non-intrusive and would
not reveal latent manufacturing defects. There are no vendor recommendations that specify
predictive maintenance to identify degrading magnetic components prior to failure.
Thermography, surge testing, or other maintenance practices may reveal a potential fault
developing after the insulation sufficiently degrades, but it might not be enough in advance to
prevent an equipment failure in-service.
Reviews by the licensee and the NRC revealed past industry experience with degraded voltage
regulation magnetic components. However, these prior events did not conduct detailed
laboratory analyses to determine the failure mechanisms. In most cases, the failures were
attributed to age related degradation. However, the DuPont Nomex insulation material used for
the linear reactor coils was found to be rated for an extended life while in service up to
428 degrees Fahrenheit (220 degrees Celsius). In this case, the manufacturing defect was
attributed to poor workmanship and assembly techniques during original component
construction. The failed component was originally assembled in the 1970s and installed in the
1980s. The defect went undetected until its ultimate failure under loaded conditions. The
relatively small amount of run time on the EDGs, over several years, facilitates characterizing
these types of defects as age related failures whereas latent component manufacturing defects
can actually result in failures earlier than what is their expected service life.
CONTACT
S
This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this
matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation project manager.
/RA/
/RA by MTschiltz for/
Timothy J. McGinty, Director
Daniel H. Dorman, Director
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
/RA/
Glenn Tracy, Director
Division of Construction Inspection
and Operational Programs
Office of New Reactors
Technical Contacts: Joseph Bashore
Prem Sahay
623-393-3737
301-415-8439
E-mail: Joseph.Bashore@nrc.gov email: Prem.Sahay@nrc.gov
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
CONTACT
S
This IN requires no specific action or written response. Please direct any questions about this
matter to the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor
Regulation project manager.
/RA/
/RA by MTschiltz for/
Timothy J. McGinty, Director
Daniel H. Dorman, Director
Division of Policy and Rulemaking
Division of Fuel Cycle Safety and Safeguards
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
/RA/
Glenn Tracy, Director
Division of Construction Inspection
and Operational Programs
Office of New Reactors
Technical Contacts: Joseph Bashore
Prem Sahay
623-393-3737
301-415-8439
E-mail: Joseph.Bashore@nrc.gov email: Prem.Sahay@nrc.gov
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
ADAMS Accession Number: ML093340392
ME2313 OFFICE
EEEB:DE
Tech Editor
BC:EEB:DE:NRO BC:EEEB:DE D:DE
NAME
PSahay
KAzariah-Kribbs APal
GWilson
PHiland
DATE
01/19/2010
12/15/09 email
01/20/2010 email
01/20/2010
01/25/2010
OFFICE
PGCB:DPR
PGCB:DPR
BC:PGCB:DPR
D:DCIP:NRO
D:FCSS:NMSS D:DPR
NAME
DBeaulieu
CHawes
MMurphy
GTracy
DDorman
(MTschitlz for)
TMcGinty
DATE
01/26/10
01/27/10
01/27/10
02/23/10
02/26/10
02/26/10
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY