ML20080K302

Rev 2 to Trend Analysis. Related Info Encl

ML20080K302
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	11/02/1981
From:	Michael Brown CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20079G896	List: ML20080K266 ML20080K277 ML20080K281 ML20080K287 ML20080K302 ML20080K318 ML20080K332 ML20080K342 ML20080K357 ML20080K361 ML20080K422 ML20080K457 ML20080K461
References
FOIA-83-199 PROC-811102, NUDOCS 8309290094
Download: ML20080K302 (26)

Text

'

o TITLE Trend Analysis I

N T

E R

F A

C E

S PREPARER M. A. Brown

'/,".?fi CORPORATE NUCLEAR QUALITY REVIEWER

/,.- [ / /,

.,d /

~

g 0 EC Procedure and Recoros

[

ADMINISTRATION PROCEDURE APPROVERS pu/_d

.M [4 2

1 6

0 2

y r

V0LLME REVISION NUMBER 3

EFFECTIVE 11 / 2/81 CONTENTS SECTION PAGE Purpose 1.1 1

Responsibilities and Procedure 1.2 1

Trend Analysis Procedure 1.2.1 1

g g nt b

b 3

_ REFERENCES SECTION PAGE Construction Quality Assurance 2-1801 Construction Quality Assurance 2-1802 Construction Quality Assurance 2-1603 Construction Quality Assurance 2-1601 Construction Quality Assurance 2-1001 Nuclear Design & Procurement 3-0501 Project Administration 1502 Project Administration 1504 O.

g I

Q' 8309290094 E)30622 PDR FDIA HIATT83-199 PDR (gg i

av This document is written in response to the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Part 50 (10CFR50) Appendix B, and The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program.

/r

~

m PROGRAM REVISION NOTICE N*

PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DOCUMENT TITLE MANUAL NAME & NUM5ER Eev -

Constrg+ g g lity b~1 ((

TREND ANAL.YSI3 SPECIFIC EXPLANATION FOR THIS PROGRAM PROGRAM REVISION (exact point of change CHANGE:

and exact wording to be inserted):

To address the use of the monthly Perfor-Page 2, of 3, after the sixth para, add:

mance Analysis Report as a trending tool for upper management.

NOTE: Trend Analysis Reports may be in the form of the Monthly Performance An-alysis Report (P.A.R.) for use as a management trending tool.

9 CHECK ACTION LEVEL (ONE ONLY)

@ INTERFACING REVIEW SIGNATURES (Print Names)

SIGNATUR!,S)

Incluoe change with next revision. Coglete

-f7

.. _. a 1/

p signature block @ only and send to Procedures.

(OA) p un1, m + w E

Initiate document revisio r Proj. Admin. 0203.

O., 8a 0 5TC(2_

bh% hAsG 6 Complete signature block only and send to y

Procedures.

k Process this notice at once. Complete signature block 1, and deliver to Procedures.

PROCEDURES UNIT pGNATURES (For details see Proj. Aamin. 0501.)

INTERFACING REVIEW NOTE:

Program Revision Notices need not be COMPLETED L

M typewritten, but must be legible and R. Krotseng

[.

u, A /C/4

$#2C k h/7f" 6/2

[Q3 A)

US WJCL"'"PZA 79 X "k A sv am3 EFFECTIVE DATE _1 p / 3

/

Construction Quality Assurance 2-1602 Rev.

3 Effective 11/ 2 / c1 Page 1 of 3 TREND ANALYSIS

/

1.1 PURPOSE To provide analysis of problem areas identified at the Perry Nuclear Power Plant for Trend Reporting to management and ef fecting corrective actions.

1.2 RESPONSIBILITIES AND PROCEDURE References Supervisor, Assign Construction Quality Engineering personnel to per-Construction Cons truc-form special studies or audits of those activities where Quality tion analysis has indicated recurring problems.

Assurance 2-1801 Quality Engineer-Assign Construction Quality Engineering personnel the ing responsibility for performing and reporting Quality Trends in accordance with this procedure.

Provide guidance to Quality Engineering personnel in per-forming the investigation and in formalizing the results.

Cons truc-Evaluate, during the course of audits, nonconformance re-tion views, and other Quality Engineering activities, the types Quality and frequencies of problems identified.

?[

Engineer Determine the need for Trend Analysis and the scope of the 1

investigation.

w 1.2.1 Trend Analvsis Procedure 441 'E L Trend Analysis Reports may be used to provide information, initiate a Corrective Action Request, justify special CQS Surveillance or Audit activity or frequency, or warrant rejection of a procedure or Nonconformance Report.

Cons truc-Perform Trend Analysis, obtaining an appropriate data base Construction tion by considering and referring as necessary to the following:

Quality Assurance Quality CQS Audit Status Chart.

2-1802, Engineer CQS Action Request Computer Printout.

2-1603, CQS Site Master Nonconformance Control Log and Com-2-1601 2-1001 puter Printout.

CQS Corrective Action Request Log.

CQS Surveillance / Inspection Reports Nonconformance Reports.

PAP 1502, 1504 Field Questions.

Nuclear General Correspondence.

Design &

Procurement 3-0501 t"'

9 Construction Quality o

Assurance 2-1602 Rev.

3 Effective 11/

2/ 81 w*

Page 2 of 3

.. f-a References

/-

p NOTE: The coding systems employed with AR's and NR's allow for computer sorting by several variables including:

Contractors, Appendix B Criteria, Cause Codes, and NR Codes.

Obtain from other elements additional information such as tons of steel, yards of concrete, total quantities of pur-chased items and costs when needed to perform a meaningful comparative and trending analysis.

Prepare the Trend Analysis Report or Summary using tabu-lar or graphic illustrations to assess and present the con-ditions.

Present Trend Analysis Report or Summary to the Supervisor, Construction Quality Engineering.

Supe rviso r, Review and approve Trend Analysis Report or Summary and Construction Construc-deter =ine distribution in accordance with audit procedures.

Quality tion For example, for Trend Analysis on a Contractor, recipients Assurance Quality of the report are (as a minimum) the Contract Adminis-2-1801 Engineer-trator, and the Contractor.

For CEI Management awareness, ing copies of all Trend Analysis Reports or Summaries are attached to the CQE Performance Analysis Report (PAR).

9 Give the reviewed Trend Analysis Report or Summary to the Construction Quality Engineer.

Construc-Present reviewed Trend Analysis Report or Summary to the tion appropriate responsible elements (as determined by the Quality Supervisor, Construction Quality Engineering) for corrective Engineer action.

Supe rvisor, Report Trend Analysis recommendations and/or results to Construc-the General Supervising Engineer, Construction Quality tion Section.

Quality Engineer-ing General Report Trend Analysis recommendations and/or results to the Supervising Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department.

Engineer, Construc-tion Quality Section k%*."

4 L

Construction Quality Assurance 2-1602 8

Rev.

3 Effective 11/ 2 / 1 Page 3 of 3 References Construc-Maintain copics of Trend Analysis Report or Summary. Unless tion used as an attachment for a CAR, NR or Audit / Surveillance Quality Report, Trend Analysis Reports are considered a management Engineer-tool and not a quality record, ing Record Clerk Q 'E gg$0( b 141/M/3/kd L% %

k l

l m

l l

t E

6515 l

l

z..---q.;..-....--.....-..--....--.----_-..

c.),.

41 Pei'me.n Penr Freducts 2., j., :. ', (

• 13;

/

s - -- -a liONCONFCF.I.tANCE P.CSCRT PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT fiO.'ttry1REV.12 77

.. o r.. T N o., _

ttEw N AME CWA'8TITT

.Nc4..

"2,,

a E v. SM T.

or

.TEu

+ *

'_0,'4,'410,2,0, 4 1

1 33 5be'SPCAttic'res IP M TEidIOil.

2 y'

N N'kME 4 Net.

C R 3a NIZ A T6CN OATE

y. 4t,

D' Denlinger J.W.

Pullman Power Product's

_2

+ ' $,tf0EDev. '

1.110,918,1 age I

• ge,"Ov e v ' e ScuRCE C U R R E N T S T A *(U S LOCATtoH e, W4 TEM /

Q

' ~~ $u AT Eni A Pullman Power Products INSTALLED RB/ 6'41 ' Az. 228 8

NawE spE C. No.

' h s v.'/ E C N.

' i a '.

• d A ESPoNSIB L t;

' ).

.,4

/

l t

• S onoAniz ATic.

Project Organization SP-I. y*I NCR CATEcony: O s apossint E sic Ni r:. 1 20 : Tu A soa r di s uiNo=( MCEM4

.. r T yp dQ El EQUIP./ R AT'L.

Of il INST ALL ATf oN -

4 0 < ai P a o_c_a a t -

.YPE..

• COVERNING iINCLuoE ACCEPTANCE

, ccuinEuEN CniTE9: A ANo coC uT. Nos.1 IX-UT-1 a

hj:,:..

r...um.w (REL AT E TO

' ' C ESCRIPT10N oF NC 7

cNCoNFonuANCc coot 0,0l2 LIN E @. 6) After surface preparations were made for ultrasonic inspection, both visual and U.T. indicated a relevent linear indication on Penetration next to 1-R72-19. (f1 #01 and Penetration l'R72-5008 (from the toe of t'1e t

': eld along the centerline axis). Penetration 1R72-5308 was originally identified on l

,PF P ::9 5?7.uhich,a Ms..be. en voided.- - - ---

~ - - - -

1

.. u-c +. m m,

p NC AU SE OF NN CAUSE

['i, '.f,[pcN:oN r onvi ANCE 'l

.' e 0,2.5 Base metal material problem.

CeoE (d

^

)

REY!EW'ED FoR lo0FR50 55 :e)

A';D locM21 REFOTASil.lTY.

lBEWEWED BY 0-//-11 }_/2

$Y g

DME 1;i ba r

.a

---

uw---~---

pkoposEO

~ -

f'.,g,s*..p'{-(yf iSPOSI T IC '.

' C ULC [S ib

i. C RD.or:K f 21 :

nEp AIR (31 2

. C SCnAp l ')

9 f

' 4' l JUSTe r'C ATioN:

l L._

a r

=

r-r.=

.ar.-. -

.zr-

==-

g,/g,5T E 2S TC PRE sEN T j

, jyi h%, R,,C CU R R A N C E '.is i

.r. a-_- z -.=w.m

.:r :. -

.'--------.zma--

---u.1

^'"

""E

?.'.b'

[.$'

_E LP. o &G.V,

/

ENC./CoNst.

a /CC

_ 1. $

l.t,

.. 5dk

'/ [(

R EVIE W A E Q'o.

C YES I' No DECl? ION -

C ACCEPT-....]

' '. r '17.

~

.O,.

a.; r.

..,*f4

4GtNTEm DaTE Q & /Q C

~*'E

7,, spesi? c.e;,.-y.v,.... i a d- - --

!.c" - *'!

• o 9

{

.,u.

t l

j

,,. p ic r E.-

.,.'./9

-n n,-

.s.

.r.

-- a

,.o g

' i -- :,.

. _. s.,,,.,.., s,.,..

yM'.y.,/ 4 c/.

1 5

0,4931 4.J Pullman Pcwcr Freducts

,; 70 m ?.

w~ e e,.. n..

.,4 Y

r PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT N 88 2 REV.12-77 a tv. SH T.

or it au seeNT wo.

IT EM N.ut CWANTWY

.90,I h. p[bN., h,$k0 1

2 k-iRi7$-$S9h. '.MkO} 0$ '

1

.N c y

.l' r

• " * * ~ ' * * " * "

FOM%ssuEofv$9y' f "D Denlinger D.L).

Pullman Power Products

.1,010 S S.1

, U P,'#, % a v f

C ^# '.7 SOURCE CURRENT STa TUS LO C A T ION iTcu/[/

o

,~

~

ua T Esiat,

Pullman Power Products IflSTALLED RB/641. Az. 228 5

spe c. no, acy./ c en.

~~ ~~~ f..>

waMs

./.

A E SPO NSIS L E i

ll.'.'.

Onc4NizariON,.._

Project Organization SP-l yj g.;.g g

g M C TEcony:Oi iPCssietE sicNiFim __ -

0 0 2 suA;Oain

' Us_ < uiNoa i 47 CFFF

. I ~ 'i ~.-l.

NCn97/(pMi _ !TYPt QfE) EQUIP. / M AT'L.

< O'Pi aaOcaAu

. QIil INST ALL ATIOC

-l f.).,'.A',*

YPEg,

.a-

.. ~

f INCLUoE ACCEPTANCE i

k GOVERNING aEcuinEuCN CniTEmia ANo OOC MT. Nos.)

IX-UT-1

' 4.

w' s,@.v ; u u m u m w.s D CSCRIPT#CN OF '

NC

...I

}

(RELATE TO

(',*,

'l

- 1_.

/m..".w.' NcNCCNFCRMANCE.x iQ22 r.....

After surface preparations were pade for LINE NO. 6) 7 CODE 2

i I_ ultrponic inspection, both visual and U.T. indicated a relevent linear indication o Panetration next to 1-R72-19,J_.W. !01.

1

.. /,, a[*'. v C AU SE C F $dh '__ f

: : __ _---,._:_rsw.----.,.__, _ _ _. _..

_,._m 4 : - ---,.,, + faf,4,=,; -9,..,

V CAUSE COoE

. (7,

.,('WNjpN O N C O N F O RM AN C E 4

1 l

N.

.s :,.,-

I h*O,. P A C F O!E oN'4'7' E,_.., :" U

+~ -

/~-

Ar.ORK #2i j f HED AIR (3) ?

"U h,C A 5 l S 8 41 SCRAD I ll

[.

i h_2.{

/['If,PC SI T s O NYr'ffh.y JL STe r'C ATION:

a

-l l

I s,

t n.t,,

b'/.

,2 a.3*.'/yT E P S T O P R E V E N*J d 4ECURAANCE s3 8

L,'

i 1

_ m _

r;_

.. _._ i,,.

., s 1....,,n.,/'.,,,f..c----- C.=.

c : o../.,[,f,.

D'Tt t N G. / c Ow s T.

oa eoe i,., *, /.

/r

,_._,_4.,,.,,l_m._ l.t.

'..,'/ ',

APNoya

• • -4.T/e' '.'.]..b Yu'u O Ac-epr O mT.,_r j

• 1 y m e n =c o'o.

O vEs I ' No o Ecisie N,

.gP oats c a to c

• . a.. c r. n g

.. c fig w

" * ~ ' *

[.. g f

.:a%;

~ ~ ~ -

-~

,,, g g

• • ~]' ;"',

'A 'G,7i,$

.wg

. ' ~.

,.I s

e v

2

.. ;,, c.. c.. _...._,w e.-

c

,... t.c n

.s ss

,.e.........,

. ', *.'k Perry Nuclear Pcwer PI:nt MPL ATTACHMENT FOR NRs and DRs

((i'ld i#

680. $175 MEV.11 00

,..s i

wo.

= a w.

sH r.

or ossenePTsom or situs Ncm Q$Q4 1

2 3

Penetration P,0,4,4 4 T EM COMP. D A T E Auf MCM6 2ED stGN ATunE DATE O'upt,,/guwo.1,R.7.2.

.l.9.

- R.7.2..S.O.0.8 1

2 3

g 4

s 7

e e

la l

11 7

2 13 1

1 I

1s 16 17 is le ao I

21

'22 23 f

1 __._.

'. 24 L.

.a.._c i.n

! f.,

.a _4

%)

..._s._.

I l

.....i_..._a_

I i

I, i

eL:s 2

..w.

1 I

/

PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT NONCONFORMANCE REPORT REVIEW / REVISION I

do.1Sas - A l

REv. 6/7e i

NR No.

b[

• 8 Issue Date d

k[

Review Required: QI Engr.

h'l '

Current Date

?

I D I

/

e l

Other j

Review Comments:

I m

,*: p ** *, T. V~*1 a

1 j r g5 ?.O

• x -; ', '

p-i p g. :

l i

l 1

l 1

1 cAur rk

% Lea gal Eng(neer Date

' Quaiily Engineer Date Other Date TTACHMENTS yES I

NO' IF THE PROPOSED DISPO$lilON WAS REJECTED. THE RESf80N$lBLE ORG ANIZ ATION SH ALL COMPLETE THE SECTION BELOW

(

ANO RE$UBMIT THE NR TO COS OU ALITY ADMINISTR ATIOM.

I

{

DISPOSITION REVtSION NO.

l OPOS O SCRAP 11)

REWORK ( 2)

REP AIR I 3) h USE AS IS( 4) 9 p

JU STI FIC A TIO N:

to STEPS TO PRCVENT RECURRANCE RESP. O RG.

11 APPROVAL j,j, REvtEw REo o.

O v s.

O "o

= = c ' *' o a '

O 'ec="'

O "<>=c' p pp 3

REVIEW ENGINE ER DATE QA/QC DaTE BOARD Naus TI T LE o TE D E SPO SITION l

VERIFIED l

j, co*v oe st mi nuvios, e. DocuwsNT CENTER 2

• FOLLOW up 3

• O RIGIN A TOR

RE.CElyEO 06 193; p f,$,n ge(%m

' "' ' l NONCONFORMANCE REPORT l,Mh.%EV.12-77 N~'

uca

5. -

=1 v..s a v.

or iT o u soir n T u o.

i* su n amat i

o u an t iT v

,l',RI7I2.

,5 0.0,LR RIRE.SLEEyf l

1

,P,P.Pl,5,8,7.Q I1 1

=..

h,,........ m.. c ~PullmanPowerProducth 0504I81 yr.,

,g.3

> w.p'? eY

\\\\

J. Steele 8

sow 8t C E i CURRENT ST A TUS bo C A Tion

'y ' ' 'e v ' Q'

'4

• $$I8Eai At CEI l

HOLD / INSTALLED RB#1/620' AZ 220 0

N A EsPONsiB LEN

.P-lga44 1

g ORG ANiZ A TION md Pullman Power Products

'h,[' *[ NCRk,YMh C ATECORY Ot iPossistE sieNiwi.

~O2 iM.;oni' D3 i o..oo,

e,..h,','

Ty P Q,hj]

T Y P E'. Q t E) equip./ M AT L.

Ot s) IN CT ALL ATION CiPI PROGRAM

[pYSY[' 24 GOVERNING 6'

. ',V) i INCLU DE ACCEPT ANCE

\\

i

,T;j$fffaEouraEuch L' '., CRITERI A AND DOC'MT. Hos. ) Procedure X-ll Visital Examination _Erocedure.l l5

.l ff ip'BEsEnff#dfol N jh d,NoscoNronMANC R J CODE 0U Electrical penetntion sleeve aumassammen NC

'act^TE Tc

"E"

./

has a lateination which runs from the toe of_ the weld a inTo t.he_ sleeve along the

/

N centerline _@ts.;_approximately 24" lona

./

m

. '.f e

CoSE 0,3 'i7 -

Unknown. May be a rial blem that ocemed due

^

8 flding

/

f. " g

\\

/

I b

\\

y&

mv c

u g02i $ no.in esi O ust is is 4'

p80?r 5R "sCn.

5 i

Dsm7-W

~ /

\\

l susTiriC ATioN I

Grind ou_t_e..m_m.t.__and repair byA__e_1J. (no.\\

l i

\\

I _N-l l

h3k'a"tCu$ANC7" Welding inspector will be notif_ied_of this oroblem and asked tn

~

[ inspe t_more closelv for material type._defacte nrinr tn weldinn_

I h'ThCkhj[h' N,'c'dj bp bydh h hadiZ/

6 r ~cF m,*-

iMo.#Pr n

,,,f at oE. m.o.

LT, vEs nr 1rm E

f & l' h/T/

b A!

l A

J ji$ g '!I k [7c$cczNTN C.i.

gg i-.nutio.

a-roLLowse s onioimaton i

e,o c u

y.n..,5..;

... ;- z. : -

=, ;-.

f; u+...,-

.y 4. 3.,;.-

a

-m RECEIVED

-f.'.*

PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT DEC 0 21981 HONCONFORMA J REPORT REVIEW / REVISION NO.1523

• A 9.Cuestfit Coen Act,

}

CCV. S/7s t h NR No.

LfC 7 8 issueDate /0309i Cwrent D.te

/538I Review Required:

O gal Eny.

@QE Other i

l l

Review Comments:

Accc,0 W ~ aJ s&d, %fo(),, g f ye, At A sa 0,

f P441 ddowd +L>. dette/> da m n + as p efa sud.

e Le G c r e A %

eta a w.dv ucAV "9"h ue cc.

4.~4, 4 a u. M Q.-d 46<. A hy ss A l

mLuca. Gibsch Ma3 Ag

• M ofca. eAcae. ced

[ $i

//f V r/ /

M ai i -w -ta M

f cai ensi;6er

< c.ie c/ canty ensider o.te otner o.ie f

I ATTACNMENTS.

ygg NO 17 THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION WAS REJECTED. Te4E RESPONS15LE ORG ANIZ ATION SH ALL COMPLETE THE SECTION SELOW AND RE8UBMIT THE NR TO COS QU ALITY ADMINISTRATION.

DISPOSITION REVISION NO.

g P ROPO SED SCR AP l Il REWORKIal REP AIR I 31 USE AS IS I 4)

OlSPO SITIO N JU STi rIC ATIO N:

Oh*._

1 a

e f

[ M'T F,

h L I

~

+- -

.n yy 10 STEPS TO PREVENT RECURRANCE

' $_g.2 w.a ji e

~

i a a.,.....

.. E II APP ROV AL l

l mavsta mae o.

Q.ss O eso os cisioes Q a..sp, i

O a='=='

p

(

4 R EVIEW smesmas.

ca,a ea/o.

o.Ts g

'o/

SOARD

.O- <g

\\

g'g' aus urus oars oESPOSiTiON

\\

vERIrlto g

,l J,

.............,0, n.co.

.s...s.,s.

.... m. o.

.....s,.....

/7

=

T:h,v.:i.uk a.:. *.s6 ::. >

v- ~. %.*;F 5 ~,.::.~ 7. V..... R.i.7. G:I:T'.?..!. :.F_..:_*..: f

~

.~.

3 cass fd '-

y y !

U.=

///M U nmrivrn 6' 1A./

W/

REVIEWED FOR 1CCWOM (e)

PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLAN DEC 11981 MD 10CFR21 REPORTABILITY.

'.'.".?

HONCONFORMANCE REPORT r r;L,,,,u a

w o, seas n a v. H e me ilg3Ns.

NAS'O' Im Ento fr 0

DAwa s

0,g:n-r--**~

^ '

A'r e - ~?~i=-- -

- ~4n ~'"s.: -.--

3 1232

' ~ ~ '

" 'o '^o' f1 i,g;ch7'gg ea o

1 i

uv, w+,

coven fprat'nE l :'

Y 1_WF Rntrls d

. CGigs F M I

ITEM /

j' s

AtameA

,TArrWoon wArit. Par n.

IN-PRDCESS CONTROL COMPLEX EL. 679' I

ORG ANIZ ATION b:l*I2??: "***

" * * * * "'TW nEs,0Nanou 5:?M

" ~ " * * '

f O

. Ib w d../..

l.E. COMETOCE SP*

25 $ 3 Y3 III a

NCR CATECORY r

S e :-

.r 403<MAso=P-N 3 s uiNoa n 1

s IlO P RoG R AM '.i

., TYPE ETYPE; hEl EQUIP./ M AT'L.

Ot t i tNsTALLATIOWi.

[

i GOVERNING '.%?l@'."." I INCLUD E ACCEPT ANCE

]

_ mEcuinEutN '?!:Fi^ ifs:. CRITERIA ANo DOC'MT. NCs.)

LKC OC/0A MANUAL 4.11.1 RR.914.nnM R1t_ 7A RFV. E 0 &

O O 7

C E E NO. e PHYSICAL / N CAL. M (3) 3/4" I h" I

A36 STEEL COVER PLATES USED POR DIRECT ATTACHMENT CONDUIT SUPP01.TS, DETAIL "D",

l SS-215-005, SR. 7A, REY. E, OF VAltIOUS LENGHTS, DISPLAY NON-METALLIC INCLUSIONS. THE l

INCLUSIONS ARE OF VARIOUS SIZES WITH THE LARGEST BEING APPROXIMATELY.45" LONG I.07" WIDE, DEPTH UNKNOWN. PLATES ARE LOCATED AT EL. 679', AGAINST NORTH WALL BETWEEN 2 & 3.

1. $! kki INDETERMINATE / UNKNOWN 8

Co o

4 >

q PW m rr.-_

..w as 00$t: 6 r

1 1spostTsoN'_s 9%.M MWW:Ma%s SA~MiLih pmoposto 7 i M

+R h c.c p sCnA. Its 4;gt MEwonn rat i f nE.A n rail

's=,'"ifsC Al ig isi; s

8 JUSTIFICATION'PLA rE G Wm R s.

s c eA p pen L im W ILt_ coWn uus l

To EF Ch R1 'r M is TYPE oF DEf*tzff PER PectsouRE.

\\e TEPs TO PREVOT

'8 mECuaaANCE Fi E L B to i u $fl e E PLATE < Do no r-4-1 Avp i

AMV

\\/l 5 i ML'd i M c t ti.9 16 A1 5 R F FA R. P irdATAL1 ATsAAl.

5

~

i b

/

4s-w/4

@IY[

'l."

ova l5(~)

.Ev. s..h oc, vE. <nn

- ' oh m.~t.c n.... >..

t:

"E"N Y%h&,k

"!?k/B} - 5'1.hN 5$NBif.'E yAvs= 1y

, x

,,, c.

V f t/ t / $ Z" A Z l

=

l, 8

=

x.s - ~

-~

m~

e-

~-

'- '.* ":. l '.

??,,'.

.:: ~,:.-s, ' y-..:. 2

4..

..:-.': m..., e p t.,> r :9..s....,~.

_; g _y

. ac.,c.y.c.> ~ -

u,. h~,

ic

,.,2 is

~.

~'

a.

s.

e

/

QNCC SECT a.

i asrECr:0N mEreRT so.

OaA i

I,0 CATION

/. A'~M.

//> A#L 2 e.r> c 4, DATE [M.2 %f 1 uSPEC7cn $ #ivreT~

A4reL -

', - unannn1 AuD xaEnZscess f g c yd 2 7 6.y'

.z.s'sut 4+rc 1

/*~ 36 ~8 /.

An C. Q c n y cx;fy scewig of /hnes

• S' ant < s H tA*t.

SesnA**d k>Y Wnec Anst h*-v FOR IMf0RMAT!0N t (9 7:

.f

'A,.,\\b=,g'

.e l-RECOMMENDED CORRECTI7E ACTION:

at

< Yf RZ7IEi4ED BY eM ACA CORRECTIVE ACTION T.AEIN:

l r

a RESPONSE DATE A - AUTHOR M/

AWACEME5T,

//-

/

ACCEPTABI.E h UNACCEPTABI.E h 2m

//-.2.7-8 A DISPOSITION:

Sigtacu Dace

( /# 4 [re/ //

5, CCMMENTS:

,,p yy

<-n-ru LUFIffDrvtrw ensenaso me =ovso navisso rm.s onio cars nav. mars amaa IV-e-

~

- ~.--

. wi.in-:

y ~<_,

=

u. -

' ~ f :: 's.

.;1

~~

• c.,.

. :.r -

3 w_' _ -

e x

....z - - -

dlA lt. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY, INC.

h QA/QC SECT 7

TRAINING ATTENDANCE LOC l

THE FOLLO'4ING PERSONNEL ATTENDED TRAINING CCNDUCTED 3Y

/M7 A&/

M8 CN/d-M-[b FOR PERIOD

/

(TITLE)

(DATE)

(IDE)

TOPICS CCVERED LUDE:

(INSTRUCTOR MAY ATTACH OUTLINE OR COURSE.%TERIALS.)

h bl

• • 70 l.80$ kl lAl$d W '( x. w r.,:+:5 4. y._. u a e

....s-3 j

• • [-

4.11.1

'ss:h PERRY NUCLEAR Potter PIXC

• N'"

L. K. COMSTOCK & COMPANY,INC.

t' QA/CC SECT USPECTION REPCRT NO. A/ / #70 l

1.ocAT10N A 6/AW nATE f-N t -

usPECTon /HrdA4 retd 11-A64*

nEhUEnmENTANDnETERENCEs: Ltd /Af/. 46W AV 71W1-I I

I, i

I

,i FINOD G: /sf4 M I

MIMMM DOM M

,$4$0'/ddO NM75 Ms41?Mt**998. $ &//69) $MWAY

.l Armsss -

i I

.I u

I REColetENDED CORRE3IVE ACTICN:

ogsLQT gg7['S.QE.5.(ih.I $fIE bE.N l

Y. '.

'.E[p',.'ik'f C f I

f g

~ M~6 --

}

j os**'

,.p fp._.

C#

)

REVIEtiED BY M '

A..AC CORKICTIVE ACTION TAXIN:

g-i RESPONSE DATE A-AUTHOR ATTACHMENT M-DISPOSITION: ACCEPTA31.E UNACCEPTAB

-- #MM 41[aturU d*

Date

~

LEVEL il REVIEW M. lW " 'A-'

COMMENTS:

e 2

I.

entsanEQ apomovgo AEvtSED TITLE O RIG. Q AT E mEv.DATE PACE RSL PRM TWP PROCEDURE 7/14/80 4/2S/82 TORM 4118

,...ej-e

• g 4 *,

e f._..~.m.

_e

)

O O O b,

'^,

Tio Cimland Electric lilaminsting Csmpi ny HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE DEP" ORIGINAL AS OF

,3 m m. 4

...- v. 9 -o s D te /d[/3[$1nt's 7/ph A

IN SI File No.

.30117.O91.

Audi.t ember. O,0,(,,3 S.. H Criteria Nn.

.. l. 9.

Responsible Ot9anization

.P.P,P,

,0,h,b,

N 120h81 Prepare! By: - _M. A. Brown W/_ /_'.o#

Initials w issue Date i

t i

MAB Nonconforming Material, Parts or Components Appendix 8 Criteria PPP's system for NR clese-out deae net ~ ev4an fn - en = 4 +4 va va*4 *d e n+ d e -

Observation:

?'R s i.e., NRs are closed via verbal communication between the field and CA Manacer:

are closed out without the supportinc documentation attached to the NRs: NPs are closed out without proper review of available documentation.

b//[

Review for Significance:

Justification: __ Audit No. 630, ARs 001-005; Audit No. Sh3 ARs 001 & 002 h Recommendation: PPP should evaluate their system for NR close-out as previously recot: mended. The P/0 realizes that PPP has known about this problem from Audit No. %3 It.cannot be cnd while a stu_dy is in _ progress, there still exists some_problegg_.

determined at this,,ti_m.e. whnt,, prob 1ces_ have been found and_e_orrected _durinr tAe PPP study, CQS recommands that NRs be closed out by the inspectors doing the actual ver$ficatd.en and the supporting documentati,on_ be attached to the NRs.

f

) //-

/ )

/z _ s i

Acknowledged By: r-Action Due By Date,1.213 _0 B 1 See Attachment Corrective Action Reply:

L'a A C-Resporese By: -

M Response Date./ 212R/

N 8

OM Yd[2 dM Response Evaluation:

/

(j Evaluation:

Accept eject abo.d fM

/> A -

VMN Evaluation Date:

Evaluation By:

Verified By:

-- Verification Date d 4-t d. 7t D

~ ' ~

', [p ~

J

/#/432_

ORICi;!AL /.S OF j

y

n. so

.. avTs.is Date..ph),9 f ao

- " - ' '"jhnt's ~/??)/v Th Cleveload El ettle ille=Imellas Cweear CONSTRUCTION QUALITY SECTION ACTION REQUEST REVISION SHEET Diri 131982 pp,h

/'

g TR AIN.fADMI

' ~ ~

)T umber I #

N File No. I I

B CriteriaNo.

Activity Nazne '

IbI 4.u. o. sy o.i. QI il.S8L Corrective Action Reply IWislas As noted in resoonse to AR 51, the NR Coordinator was hired on January 11, 1982.

Response By_.

/

Response Date l,Iil... I Response Evaluation:

Jv}~

WWJ4J?h r

pgcEWED W

g 14 po qid s

~

s..-

...)

L, PERRY NUCLEAR POV.'ER PLANT

!!.AR 0 3 E32

'y a

3,,,

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT REVIE'.7/REVl510N

.n NO.1523 - A owuutNI CC"s1 AOLl PEv. 5/78 3issueDate N!d NR No O

Current Date h

Review Required:

Engr.

@E Other GtM Review Comrnents: g~,-

y' d M' -;dM,

,6 7 4~/

f

' g.

(), p.ac.,,, 124 0l'P (AC Q& Xh "I *

?

jb 4Nl A '#

4"" *

• g.cp.w cl/.a/ ~A a-aecyu44 g

_,.ay, 31, ppt. >

uA,u n

9 b$tL..l:f 2h.Y f2 _ 0-$a. '^l &lf gal E gWer hte

[ Quality Etigine(r Date OBer Date

~

ATTACHMENTS YES 0

9. THE PROPOSEO DISPOSITION WAS REJECTED. THE RESPONSIBLE ORG NO

)

y o

AND RE$U9MIT TH E NR TO CQS QU ALITY ACMINISTR ATION.

~~

ei?G.

~~

DISPOSITION REVISION NO.

• p - 2/ - f d.

] USE AS t$ ( 4)

PRCPOSED SCRAP (1)

REWORK (2)

REP AIR ( 31 3

DISPC 58 TIO N J U STl FI C A TIO N:

STEF S TO PREVENT 33 RECURRANCE

. _ a i

--s

=,-

.- nu t 4.

.r-,

e

-m

.,P. O RG.

i.j l~

II AF-F AOV AL C 7.-'s~~ C ' eld' us cision O accept Q

T J

, +..eca asa.o.

nYEY

~

. '. T C I

12 REVIEW E ** G i aer En LATE

'Qa/QC I

i

~ C A.4 0

! -O l

.aus l

! l C t SP-C t ' i J f 4 93 l

l l

s L Ut "0

j j r

.....w..

I j,j.

r..

c es

, r. i. s. p s

/9

h.Q /)

- l, g g o,g37 PERRY NtJCLEAR POWER PLANT

,i NONCONFORMANCE REPORT REVIEW / REVISION

~. N s. s s2s - A suggy*

REV. 5/78

/

uR u. PDW Dm/ Rwssssue case M -A >

Current oate a-V9A

]

Review Required:

Q gal Engr.

@E Other s

i Review Comments: j f

'2^d

.cluuN.be

.rwW/ c ~A a-+ GlU d' c

wi. p. a.r e k g aC -h-L d a m _; &

y 4 n>wk p,p AWD-

\\

Y!?$

'/M/SR

'GAI Ergirier oate Quality Engineer Date Ott.er Co te ATTACHMENTS YES tid M

V

[

C'IHE PRCrOSED OISPoSITION W AS HEJECTED, THE RESPON SIBL E ORG ANIZ ATION SH ALL COMPL ETE THE SECTION GFLOW AND RESU9MIT THE NR To CQS QUALlTY ADMINISTR ATION.

bb DISPOSaTION R2 VISION NO.

] USE AS IS ( 41

] REWORK (2)

PHOPOSED SCRAP l 1)

REP AIR ( 31 9

Of SPO SITIO N JUSTIFICATION:

Furnish U.T. Inspection Reports giving the dimensires of the relevant linear indications on penetration shown On Iso. 1R72-19 (two linear indications) and penetration shown on iso. 1R72-8 (one linear fndication) for further engineering review and dispositioning.

'8 N/A Porosity and pitting in vendor furnished material.

R CURR N E W

O. # &.....,. m# ~g / 4 N, =yy g,

d) Ok". dy.D d

""*'"I---

QA/QC

.=wm A,A Os p&

.e N

R ESP. O RG.

p-

^PPaovA' o -. -

_,... c a.m...,, _ g a

• _

d

- - - ~

y

( F</D~ W I.&

2 arviEw

'a*

{>..

$'~'w-tb.}lNYM?/

Yu/lT 2 i all L

"~f-~e v.,gu-d '/.g....

Q6 L,(e.

! 'l. r.: 9,c

':Dm:~

.i -

j 1...

a

. -r-a-

-m u.

1s c evv. s c s.=.n f

2.<

[

_ y_$

r

r..

I...]* *

• eQ Pui!Mt.n ~(... r Pr *.30!8 f,[r'

,0.h.c _

l

{ '-

y.',

y

>.v.vt...

..s PEP.RY NUCt. EAR t'OWER PLANT l

NO. 61.hi.12 REV.12 77.

.s c t. * ~ T it v

.ca...

N5... ;. f c v.

• • • 7.

or

_i T s u.

i.: c r.

• < o..

e

-w e4.uc-1

.P,O.4,4 i 0 4 0,4 2 1

4

'See, MPC Attachment

. PENETRATION.

2

...T.

c s.~i:. Tic ~

/

e Tc 3,,

.;p,3 ~>ac y;.,$gg$,,I a'Y id'~ ~ SCVRC E CU ENT ST.TUS LOCATtON D. Denlinger Mf.

Pullman Power Products 1,2l0,418.1 y.3 l

r y, e l '

l,'s.'.

tTEMI u A T E w L Pullman Power Products INSTALLED RB/641 Az. 2280

~T s.wE spre,NO.

, F. C V. / c C w.

3.,I'l,,*','...,p ' E SP O N t :

i') e 3 L EQ ',

r

?

IPoSSIBLE !'oNor O2 cuA cai-("SP,. )l g ;. 4, f

,,__6 e

4._M., y'pf, a2ANiz^Ticsc.

Project Organization a 3 v uiscai:. Odd, e -

','.3'''Y. C r5 /k,CATEOcAYC1 f6.2l.'['.'N[ Y T Y P E.,yp,f.'q. --TYrt M CI EQUIP. <' M AT'L.... C: II It:IT ALL A TION -

/ Oipi eaocaaw- ~

ac ~-

I

' 'NCLUD E ACCE;*T ANC E

" G O V E R

• N G'y';[lh,'hh

'l* d a.

wl'.'['+I*,

4EQ CcIT ERI A A t4D OcC*MT. N O S.)

IX-UT-1

'J i r% E V E N T';,'Ql v.g.p' E SO RIP T 'o' O F ';'t5.*.m :;.,.7i.v:.;- y NC-l '! -

IFELATE To

,,,g C

p..'xq,v N:cN ronu AN c E.3 j.3,COOE l 0l 0) t '? E *o 5'_ After surface preparations t.'ere made for. _

y o

i i

ultrasonic insnec. tion, both visual and U.T. indicated a relevent linear indication on tuo penetrations.

Penetration shown on 7 o.1R72-1 ad two linear indications and the Nae-

/

j l tration shown on Iso.1R72-8 had one linear indication./) ~(- -v>t..

~~

oc. O.

~ ~- - *.: -;, y g. ; ; _ y,.

- = - - - - -

=.

.s a c.

...a,... a.a

• 1 Au be. ; F.

• El * '.: *. c> 5 l

.:s.m.gon.5,. cc :.a1 copei0,2,5 Base metal material problem.

i l

l d

I m m ---,.-

,.._--------------m.-

._m l

.,7.., i, s. __

c.c u.n iai.

O usc A:..

~..

......,..=os O. (.o.

O..u..o r n.

-[g]

<2i e

~.

.... >. +j u_.

._.=_.

tera

~.

Explore extent of porosity and pitting per PPP Procedure i

's IX-114.

Foport findings on a revision to this NR for i

}

\\g dispositioning.

-- =,

~..,,

,,,.m.7.; r - ~ ~ ~ = m --

- - - ~ -

- 7'-Q.. ' N. N 2.'cl"W

_.._. P..cie.sl otut' P'I'?'kr3 in V_e.ti.f r - _,i

_...-.i.l.'?.,$...N_ A 6

_.j.. ! W.fiS re f /179'.c M ' 8... 3 ?E. _ t / _d.

I fc.q

=

4 ;- -

-7..m-

' ih.

W ' j c,0.. d.. a =...=....f g p j dJ L,&,

_. o r.

.... a e q.e ;. m W g i f...

y _,,,_.,,, _.z__g;4_, ;

=...

h fy,g.

.. m. 0.

., as

.m...

_ s c. s,..

o L.

s'1. 6. /6 u-Y/M 2 e..fr.A u0 Y

,,..e.=

t. r c,

~.>u_

y i.

,7 4

.3.

e i

Ferry Welear Power Plant MPL ATTACHMENT FOR NRs and DRs

i. -

E

( fId )

g ',"n, NQ. $175 REV,11 80 wcn no m av, sM T.

or osscmepteow or ar gus l*

P,0,4,4 0,2,0,4 2

2 4

Penetration i

v..

o.

n so co-. o.n

• urso izao m ~*1uas om,,

' l.'.Z,2 1.9.,,

1.R.7.2.

.8, 2

3 A

B g

4 g

f5 I

e A

E 0

1 A

R 7

8 9

10

.. _.,_a 4

tt 11 L.u

• t a

f 13

_,r \\.

s g./

\\

a 15 a

a 1

i 17 19

..a.. w _=.

a

' 10 s.

20 B

1 a

1 a

I 21

' 22 23 J.

24

.- -,.a

..s a =

a..a n.

• • it

-.1 L-s.!

=a s.,

....r.s 27

---

J.

4 a e i s.

28 l

.I

+.

2,-

,- a.

r a.,

Tha Cisvol:nd El:ctric illuminxting Ctmpany CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUEST

,,o. m.

nr.y. p30 kJ N UM B E R DaTE IIID E D T O

~

82-06 February 25, 1982 L. K. COMSTOCK, SP-33 REQUIREMENT:

Title 10. Code of Federal Renulations. Part 50. Appendix B._' Criteria IX.

which states in nart " Measures shall be established to assure that special precesses.

includine... Nondestructive Testinn are controlled and accomnliched by cualified norsonnel usinc cualified procedures in accordance with applicable codes..."

CONDITION:

T. K. Comstock Procedure 4,1,8 "Macnetic Ear.ticle Inspection"_does not include all of the accentance standards reauired by AWS DL1 (1975).

/

\\

RECEW E O

/

// /

..AH N <b3 i~it.*

-op oncawizarion:

g nespouse ove 6

. Leidich N a -

D l'fff.' W S4 f)

NQAD be QRE wm

([.SPONSE 1) Peference addendu 7.8-1 to LKC Procedure 4.7.8 (Attached)

2) Magn' etic Particle Inspection procedure currently provides cdequate control, test and accept-ance criteria to perform and evaluate required test with the exception of the paragraph ep cified in addendum 4.7.8-1.

3) Proper screening and procedural review will prevent recurrance.

J

$fY f

L "E

m' CLOSE OUT:

/

/

o^TF'

/

1"ZLL& '

^

A 7 g f

Accept y Reject COMMENTS:

Th2 cbove response is acceptable with the following recommendation. A percentage of the itemr, that were previously MT examined should be re-examined. The re-examination program chould be based on a recognized Sampling Plan such as those provided in Mil-Std-105D, "Scmpling Procedures and Tables for Inspection by Attributes", of April 1963; t

OISTRIBUTION:

L 20 Crpy Distribution:

Irhite - Original Canary - Organization Pink - File Goldenrod - Follow-up

' ""s's**? "

g 1.. x. COMSTOCK & COMPANY, itsC.

u 7

' 7 8-1 PROCEDURE ADDENDUM P. A NO.

?

4.7.8 PROCEDURE AFTECID:

REFERENCE ECN/DWC. NO.

N/A DCAILS AND BACKGROUND OF PROCEDURE CHANCE PROCEDURE REVISION TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE ADD PARAGRAPH 3.8.2 TO READ:

CRITERIA AS SPECIFIED IN A.W.S.DI.1-75, 3.8.2 INDEPENDENT OF Tile REQUIREMENTS SECTION 10, PART E, PARAGRAPH 10.17 0F PARAGRAPH 3.8.1, DISCONTINU-SUBPARAGRAPH 10.17.2.2.

ITIES HAVING A GREATEST DIMEN-SION OF LESS THAN 3/32" (2.4mm) jg IF THE SUM OF THEIR GREATEST DIMENSION EXCEEDS 3/8" (9.5mm)-

IN ANY LINEAR INCH OF WELD.

p f

c t

.~,

N.~.

(

0 ATTACDE.HT(S)

APPROVALS:

L.K. COMSTOCK N

/ t. _ d.+c/.-..-

' ;t/(Acz Pr et Manager Data

!f b

L.K. COMSTOCK c

Qun11ty-Kisdrsace Manscer Date

/

PROJECT ORCANIZATION P 8_

. n._ M

//

2--

Dscd

/

(

polity Assurstice Engineering PMCPAftCD An's flovt.O NCVILCO TITLE ORIG.QAIC 04CV. U AT E PAGG 9

W RPR PROCEDUnE 6/4/80 PORM i117 j

i l

• ** *f. Q..R t' ey.

s ;f*? %:.. ry 4. t. < ~ : owe-l W'e ';:,...,

if :.

~,,

. ~,.... *;.,':y.c

, n a :,

y,.;..r:

,y y-,

s u,a.

7

_L.

~~nys' ir

^,

__.../.

',]; m :. ~_.

6*_

' ~ '

r A

y e'

f,.. g....

.... - - - -. = = - - - ~ - - -

PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT

'7 NONCONFORMANCE REPORT REVIEW / REVISION 4wu NO.1623

• A l'.EV. S/75 NR No.

[ l'C 1OII lssueDate

,2 4-A L Current Date 3

• Y. 8 8.-

Review Regired:

@AlEngr.

QQE Other Review Comments:

NE 'Us2 4s Is* hlSPoctriou m NCGPraBm

'iv rHe sa3imeeA, THE

$t+E OF 'rtHE trac Lusrew.s,MS M @ cuinhN 19cceArp8t2 Lmors AND U!'U-ror AGREct 'T?fs in17s 6 Airy of p,LG ft, &cd'7AcrGD C, UiR1Mr-6R

\\

tENG totGBAtti)6 QN 3-31 -2 1)

.W :"%d la = & '~M -7 f ;,24 @Q f

• e*~ f' f 4

h w?= =*/ A W den.fwy G,./ mhr W ' & w p,,: 4 g. 4 Auss tob m f >:

G A b-W.'

.2 e S y 4 5 M Ae &k T ^ ^^ ^-

d

,' yM 3. 2. 3.

WY fbE$.

6, A

e i

1% 3-31-e 2. -r4dmn n!,/,r~e ivA.

g L/$A1 Engineer Date

1. Quality Efigineer

'Date Other Date ATTACHMENTS yg, O

/

NO IF THE PPOPOSED DISPOSITION WAS REJECTED. THE RESPONSIBLE ORG ANIZATION SH ALL COMPLETE THE SECTION BELOW AND RESusulf THE NR TO CCS QU ALtTY ADMINISTR ATION.

i OlSPOSITION REVISION NO.

i 9

OPOS O SCR AP ( 1)

REWORK (2)

REP AIR ( 3)

] USE AS IS ( 4)

JU STI fig O N:

IJ A -

3 TCI\\,/Ch g Undr hrn r

w, w

-.cepg mesa j

,.f e l " !Pf./f 7g). X. COMSTBCK C0., INC.

g3 STEPS TO PREVENT y ',

j' ff /

%E RCCURRANCE L.

6.'

_w E~ G.e C o ~. r.

o.,oC o.1E II APPROV.*L l

l R EVIEW REQ'O.

C YES

] NO DE Ci sIONt

] ACCEPT R EJ E C T 12 R EVI E W ENGINE ER DATE QA/QC l OATE I'

BOARD 1

NAME TI T 1. E o.yE D E SP O S17,0 N

\\r ERIFIED l

,l

,l e e v oi s, i.uv.o~,

i. oo euutu, e EurE.

,., o i. i... u,.

' 2/

}

.; s (-

'U 'f. i f' ;; \\.' Q*q**],*[dii f,5,-

'/*

I.4 T-r;,,., ' [. c.; .{, c,

.,. rf g.,),

,}

9

._ o -

i s

S.,a.

vi.. n.

9 a c.

+ +

h!'

a,( d5 *F7 hcviEwco roa Ic; rate.f.: m n'.

0;-

J [g ERATNUCLEAR POWER PLANT e

LaMd AND1 FR21 REFCRTAEMTY.

)

4 g*

NONCONFORMANCE REPORT

.N.." Mas REv. 4 7s J

2. w.'

N/A COVER PLATES I#ETTRMtNATRT W

w~ f"~r~~~ "Amc dI'hyyy. ' ""L" h 5

.d' ^ "",.",'" *~ ymge-UNtl M "

l La K ",CV l11,0 ',14 0

1 2

%;ssi, y og, 7

OR G A NGE A TI.N N/A J

m,,

R"Ev E Ni 6ME e8 u-E

.4T3 TEE M. 30 N

t. x. CO STOCx otrior.aw2:

t 8.uRCS CW ARENT ST A TU$

ma'TERib LAKEWOOD MACH. PROD.

INDETERMINATE / UNKNOWN GENERAL PLANT, ALL AREAS L.C A T1.N 3

EQRO ANIZ ATION,

• ' NAMS

,= E seO N siE L ':,

4 SPE C. NQ.

R E W./ E CN.

I L. K. COMSTOCK SP-rsm g, 777 m,4 g NCR CA T ECO RY. Q1 (POSSIELE SIGNIF%

+O2 a u A;OR n O e wiNeR o s

Type _f.

~ Type gE: Eouir./uAT L.

4 0m INSTALLATIOWJ:

• 0(ai paccaAu >

GOVERNING t INCLUDE ACCEPTANCE REcuiREutN CRiTERi A ANo occ*ur. ucs.: LKC QA/QC MANUAL 4.11.1, SS 215-005 SHEET 7A, REV. K, DETAIIS "D" AND "E", LKC NR #784 iEEicNifTTOMr xc taELATE TO 3

7

.x.

NONCONFO@uANCEg,___ CODE O

0:

LINE NO. 8)

PHYSICAL / CHEMICAL - THREE (3) 3/4" X 3 I" s

A36 STEEL COVERPLATES USED FOR DIRECT ATTACHMENT CONDUIT SUPPORTS, DETAILS "D" AND "E",

SS 215-005 SHEET 7A REV. K WITH NON-METALLIC INCLUSIONS WERE DISPOSITIONED " SCRAP" PER

(

NR LKC #784. THESE PLATES COME FROM GENERAL BAR STOCK WHICH IS CUT TO LENGTH IN FIELD.

1 (St.EATTACHMENTFORCONTINUATIONOFDESCRIPTION.)

v vv v j-g USE OF CAUSE

.,m..m CNCONFORuANCE CODE 0 ",3 i7J INDETERMINATE / UNKNOWN i

?

f N K ?.M A

• . e v p.

I u n m-. c

.a, m, n.,sE y

.,f

% ' r b l a- $

MISposlTION PROPOSED 9

. :: ~ " '^

c @ ::... -. - sUSE As is ret ?

SCRAP i 11

+Y R:!nO F'M f 21 il REoAlut (3) ;

i:

JU STIFIC ATION: Twm me oF rwa

. wet.m i ew s. wm,m o see A F F EC* T

• T"14 E STRtac'.Tt> A L f NTE& Rt T V 0F TW E ' P L ATF S [ PER t

i Awls.

TAnLP 12M T w n.

i wrm_wr oF NR Lwe Sm4 was ra T.enes (3)18P W 4.55 82' SCRAP THE

• ws/M PLATES e M LY.

--~~-- TEPS TO PREVENT

~ ~ ~

O C a pd Tl M Ls E T*o P O L L AUL7 P E a c F Mt) R G-re RECURRANCE amK =ags3rd74 / 7 C

~^~/&

&%es

.N..

R E

,E. R E O.O.

2 E.-mO m_

m.s..

n._,

(hh f

YSI/[L

$N$$-

'O O

t.cmasn MM'ah".....

hQ(4//

Z$'c n f YRB-M

'=

...........W...N.

, C.u..

8......

?..

~

I

^

- ~ * *

.a :

u-

.4 &.

',,.,,,:...? : w -n~.

.17.r.;.,.....

g,a,,...

~~~a.. : ;2..,., _ '

f.b.N

~ ~ j-, ^.. --.

• w,,

2 o

- - - - ~ -

=-

4 s, r -

8 1

PAGE 2

LINE 7 CONTINUED HEAT NO. THESE PLATES CAME FROM IS AR STOCK COMES IN TEN (10)' LENG WAREHOUSE.

THE THREE (3) PLATES ADDRESSED ON NR LKC #7 THE AVE A TOTAL LENGTH OF 4'3"..

7"djIiRFi..F.;i

)

R km n rem-..

'j" 5 '+.,, ?, n.. i 'il's p n n s

- =

ht

';,n [ ggg gf (ty LOkn my

• U ** 4 k

.~

SUPPLEMENTAgy ggggggg7 70 NR#LKC fo/[Lcs SfiEEL J _ 07.3

~7

............, _ _ _ _ _ _