ML20080K357
| ML20080K357 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 08/25/1982 |
| From: | Riley E CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20079G896 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-83-199 NUDOCS 8309290128 | |
| Download: ML20080K357 (9) | |
Text
'
. O '
,. s c
- }i e %[Q'ytsYdAT Y_
. ~ '
. .w L~ .
C~ ~
M. t. * ** ~ " Mme AU G 2, ;;> .iti 0 Page 1 of 2 By: g, pijeyf Project _ Perry Nuclear Plant Telephone Call G Conference .
With: .. Jim Peschel * .
l Company: _ NRC t Region III i
],
Subject:
CNO AP/N4 5. 2 vs . .
s l SP 709/ Contractor Procrans Note: _ I called M .
l Peschel per our cammitment in our _
{ _
(Mr. meeting of Auou s': 17, 1982.
i Peschel was here to get further clarifi ___
q,
, participation in the recent C. A T cation of concerns he had during his
. . inspection of PNPP.) _
that CEI would perform a review of it .
I informed Mr. Peschel 5 s CNQAP with respect
,* E h to insure that the intended requira to ANSI N45.2 references QQ l
k result of subsequent; revisions to the CNQ APnentssawere n .
N. canpleted in about a month (9/24/82) I indicated this review should be level attachment specc. or contractorsat which time, if any revisio a y w be accanplished by January, 1983 prograns were needed, these changes would Mr.
acceptable to him. Peschel indicated this iimetable was (He recognized on--going workload would impact this effort.) and present priorities Mr. ' Peschel w / CNQ AP, then asked if CEI intended to make any Section 0200, Pg. 3 of 4, clarifvino chances to 3rd paraaraph where we _
strating the Q A Progran 's address with " reference indexes demon presented in App . respect to Reg. Guides and ANSI as I."
He wanted to know if this would be do to NRR and Region III. ne before subnittal ,'
I indicated we would certainly review thi clarity prior to subnittal. s paragraph for Mr. Peschel indicated he had nooken wi th- Mr- Tn h n Copi:s . _ _ ci 1xr_i nh t - whn vill b y
),
\n [- ' ,,- ,. - & .kl e .L'IfkH W Y l'ht n u !*t puh its id!"},
~
i ne c ;
~-
8309290128 830622 .
g., ,
c J ien j
HIATT83-199 PDR 94Af M ,; m re~ e M2
a PNPP NO. 5019
'[.
- ReV. 5/82 Perry Nuclear Power Plant
[ ,/ [ 2.. / AR'd'M9$
- -- J ACTION REQUEST REVISION SHEET
';~
( File No. ' ' ' ' '
Appendix B Responsib1_e obs. Number lq oplopl Criteria No.
lgg Organizatt,on lg plp,Jg New Response Due Date 'O'b '
Response Revision' kM S N AJ20(Y Uz AG) t& M J71A Y h AY/m W-anNwd&d N / 98 GVJS. WA afww" aEa xrntj) (y s e a f Y a / b 5 ,r l t/ W lA $s O /2fe~b (2x [ lY S aura . M vb M'W 4 s18 - aSL - asme unA ,
.ff W w , he ]S hu rN vb.
forf: lib eiwc heercurces Nwe Eem S wl neb 5 N heofNE-Completion Date 'I Response Prepared By: O,, e/</'1 -.bA /_ _ Response Date h9N 2'l S'I
, R2sponse Evalaation: PPP response of 9/02/82 is acceptablg_to CQE.
PPP has revised WPS IT12A to reflect GE-III, subparagraph 9. 3. tehich nddrencre the use of backinn on a weld joint.
!M C E!V E D SEP-30 1002 PNF sRF Evaluation: Accept Reject Evtluation By: b ee zwo Evaluation Date: ' ' '
Verified By: 41 v >e/J Verification Date ' '
Remarks: Sec v spo,<F imarbJbMa tM [ , , 7- -
/
446/K/2/es Y$ .
- a .
- N O.16 - Ib3 CI$v3 find Elsctric illuminsting Csmprny IEEIVEO AR ,0, 4, 9, 3,
- R E Y. 9 81 -
' HUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPT.
ACTION REQUEST ,lVL 13 282
. File No. 3, O. li 1, 0, 31 2, nny!*py.
OBSNurnber . O,0,0 ,0 ,0 B Criteria No. .
O, 5 Responsible Organization .P ,P ,P ,0 ,4 ,4 ,
Prepared By: WJClemens/DSiedlarczyk Initials WJP/QES Issue te07Q842, Appendix B Criteria 1NSTRUCTIONS, PROCEDURES & DRAWINGS Observation: 1) Pullman Power Products is in the process of welding a Unit #2 Reactor Building electrical penetration referenced on PPP ISO-2R72-26. The PPP QC inspector has already accepted the fit-up of FW #01 without having access to any drawing except the Pullman isometric. This iso does not contain fit-up criteria for subject field weld. This criteria is found on Westinghouse Dwg. #E-40047, Rev. E.
- 2) PPP WPS IT12A does not address weld joints made by open butt detail with backing as is the configuration on the electrical penetrations.
N Review for Significance:
EI Justifica! Ion: PPP QA Manual,Section V, Paragraph 5.3.1, "All field fabrication and installation shall conform to Customer furnished drawings, specifications and instructions."
Recommendation:
(1) Pullman Power Products to nenerate nonconformance report covering above condition.
(M Pullman Power Products to nrovide accessability of reference drawings to field norsonnel-(3) PPP to reindoctrinate personnel involved with above condition.
(4) PPP to utilize a WPS which clearly reflects the weld configuration in the field. ,
f]
-, / /
f /} _s'/%D Acknowledged By: L M 4db Corrective Action Reply: A#1- M
. A Response By: Response Date 0,711.2 l8.2 ,
Response Evaluation: see attah ed l
Evaluation: Acce Reject Evaluation By: -
.uwt1 wwo Evaluation Date: .O.80) I MI Verified By: Vulfication Date u i . l . 1
'9
,a .
- . Pullman Power Products
. . g) Attachment to AR0493 r Audit OBS 05 t
r .
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPLY:
The Westinghouse Dwg. #E-40047 has been removed from the Field Engineer's trailer and is now in the foreman's work station. PPP has contacted Coastock. and
, they will provide additional drawings as soon as possible. Pullman does not feel that any of the work that has already been complete to date would constitute an NR condition.
4 All welding has been controlled per PPP's WPS and GWS. In addition, there will be a full volumetric inspection (UT) of the final weld to verify quality.
JOHN R. STEELE i
i
, RESPONSE EVALUATION
'~'
j AAR #0493 Starred (*) items require resolution by PPP.
3
- 1) CQE has initiated NR #CQC 2538 to address the nonconforming condition.
- 2) CQE has verified the placement of Wes tinghouse Dwg. #E40047, Rev. E, in the work area, thus providing accessability to field personnel.
- 3) PPP to provido to CQE documented evidence of personnel training in the area of utilizing proper drawings.
- 4) Per discussions with Project Organization (welding) Design Engineers, it has been determined that the Pullman Power Products WPS #1T 12 A does not adequately address the joint configuration as detailed by Westinghouse drawing #E40047. The electrical penetration joint detail is one of an open butt, full penetration weld with backing. In that the PPP WPS does address the open butt portion of this configuration, Project Organization has no concern to this point. However, in no viable way is backing on a joint identified under WPS IT 12 A or the supporting CWS sub paragraphs.
, It is this fact which concerns P/O Engineering and CQE.
ASME Section IX, Table QW-256, Gas Tungsten Arc Welding lists under the heading "256.2 Nonessential Variables", the following:
QW-402.5; (The addition of backing and its nominal composition.)
ASME Section IX, QW-201.2, second paragraph states:
" Changes may be made in the nonessential variables to suit production requirements without requalification of the procedure, provided such changes are documented with respect to both essential and nonessential variables of the specific welding process or processes, either in an amendment to the original WPS, or a new WPS."
With the requirements of the Code in perspective, PPP shall rectify WPS IT 12 A so as to reflect the actual weld configuration in the field.
l i W. James Clemens, CQE 08/09/82
(
l
.- Pullman Powgr Products f Perry Power Plant Job # 7026 TRAINING SESSION
(.
SUBJECT MATTER: fBFE M ell,c)g /0 tcbRKAk$(h1d5>MT54t?Skr7cH DATE: F- @ _ gg TIME OF SESSION: / fps,,f, ATTENDAN : -
IECmET&C6 WEM .
dn EtER NELD/AIG O ' ^ / 7 ^D E S6/' N
- 1. 014 ,a/
a/ASracernEtz>d>&a) sNe . Bur w) A6 D/%/14WED wird 7 //E I
- 2. ~
l[.canf78g/?f?6Etf 7x;S/cn/ p x t W A/G AfrEg Le'iEMstG T//E GAI
- 3. e c4 _. .
& 18. -
- 4. 19.
- 5. 2 0. __
6._ 21._
- 7. 22.
(~
~
- 8. 23.
- 9. 24.
- 10. 25.
- 11. 26.
- 12. 27.
- 13. 28.
- 14. 29.
l
! 15. 30. _
l l
l .
, INSTRUCTOR: <#/ d#
l l
i l
N
(
c' i ll f. C L E \' E L l. !.: U L L F. O T C i C I 1.1. U .'.': 1 i.' l.T i I,' G C 0 I!, P I. i,.' Y
{ ". . P.O. BOX 97 e PERRY, OHIO 44081 e TEL EPHONE (216) 259-37 T7 5 ADDRESS 10 CENTER ROAD
\ Serving The Best location in the Nation PERRY NUCLEAR POWER PLANT ape D K AISER EN' GIN E E RS, IN C.
. August 25, 1982 'i E C E l V 2 0 PY-S/ CON 4783 QA 500 3 I I['32 ru t:r 7 PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS '
10 Center Road Perry, OH 44081 Attention: Mr. J. Miller RE: Response to Action Requests #507, #493
Dear Mr. Miller:
/" Your response to Action Request No. 507 was Jte August 20, 1982 and Action
( . Request No. 493,,ReV."1,' was due August 18, 1962 Please provide a response to the above referencea AR's as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
- s. . . . .
W. James Cleciens Construction Quality Engineering WJC:lle cc: E. F. Parker R. A. Sheer -
R EGr'rier~E60' 303.044/047.2.1 ,
300.204.2 302.WJC i
T THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY I no longer wish to
.. MEMORANDUM recei 'hi" =a'eri=1-
- u. . . ..
To R.aHaye& C h _ nooM " w aW160 r v:. rnoM G. R. Leidich DATc July 23, 1982 PHONE 430 ROOM TQ6 .
susaccT AR 3011032 #0493 RECEIVED 4
JUL 2 71982
- netm.w j Construction Quality Engineering would like to extend its appreciation to you for your recent memorandum concerning AR 3011032 #0493. However, after review of both the subject AR and your memo, it is clear to me and the AR initiators that the action ,to be taken, as presented by yourself on said memo, had already been considered and so documented. The need for a non-c.onformance regart addressing the condition of the electric penetration of AR #493 was not neglectedlf CQE as was inferred by your memo of 7/8/82.
You may wish to re-review the recommended actions of AR #493 of which #1 read:
" Pullman Power Products to generate nonconformance report covering above condition."
Pullman Power Products has responded negatively to recommendation #1, at which time CgE initiated NR CQC 2538.
~ -_
If CQE can be of any additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Attachments GRL:lle cc: E. Riley - W115 E. F. Parker W. J. Clemens D. E. Siedlarczyk P., P Martin - W160 D. Benjamin - W160 -
AR File ,
302.GRL
THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY I no longer wish to
- a MEMORANDUM '"*i 'h i ' = ''i 'l-To W. Clemens nooM TQS rnow R. Hayes /N oArc 7/8/82 D. Siedlarczyk 391 PHoNc 204 nooM W160 -
susaccT AR 3011032 #0493 During a review of recent CQS AR's I came across the attached AR. According to program requirements and as discussed in recent AR Training, an AR cannot be written to address hardware problems. Since this is a hardware problem, it should have been addressed on a nonconformance report. This is necessary to avoid a recurrence of the problems identified in the NR task force assess-ment.
Please take the following actions:
- 1. Issue an NR to address the concerns of this AR or have Pullman issue it.
- 2. Close out this AR by referencing the nonconformance report.
JRH:kss Attachment ec: G. Leidich E. Riley G. Parker D. Benjamin P. Martin 301.JRH AR File l
i o
e 9
i i
- - - , - . - - - . . - ..- _ _ _ . . . _ - _ - _ . - . _ . _ _ , .. _. .,- .