ML20080K287
| ML20080K287 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 01/02/1981 |
| From: | Higaki V CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| To: | CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING CO. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20079G896 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-83-199 NUDOCS 8309290089 | |
| Download: ML20080K287 (31) | |
Text
,
9 THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY MEMORANDUM c.,
'a m.4.
1f2[b1 V. K. Higaki-DATc s150 rnow PQE ncos PHONc 392 noou S150 s u s.s tcT scheduleof Project Internal Audits A.
Attached is the schedule of 1981 Project Internal Audits. Additionally, indicated are the assigned Lead Auditor, Audit team members and a brief discription of the audits.
This schedule is intended to notify audit personnel of the Internal Audit activities for the entire year therefore, please take measures necessary to allocate time in your schedules to permit timely performance for these assignments.
VKH:kss cc:
B. D. Walrath iN -
e N
8309290089 030622 PDR FOIA HIATTB3-199 PDR 2
fil iEli gn23/81
.jp!
4 1981 Project Internal Audit Schedule PIA 80-15 Perry Operations Department Audit Team Status January This audit will evaluate the program development /
V. liigaki - LA Deferred to First implementation and organization of the Perry T. Swansiger - A Quarrar 1981.
Plant Department.
J. Jaskiel - AIT A. Lambacher - AIT It will be conducted on Site, led by PQE and supported by PQS.
PIA 81-1-03 Nuclear Test Section
- Janoary Program Areas:
Document Control P. Kelly - LA Scope modified; exchanged S. Everett - AIT Drawing Control with activity This audit will emphasizc Document, Procedure, J. Ilayes - A of PIA 81-1-05.
Audit com-and Drawing Control, correspondence control and pleted w/o 1-19-81.
flies and library / reference center use.
PIA 81-2 Instructions and Procedures February Program Areas:
Instruction, Procedure and G. Vinciquerra - LA Preaudit conference 2-12-81 Drawing, Document Control J. Fronckowiak - A GAI portion w/o 2-23-81 C. Earley - A This audit will evaluate the controls placed by M. Massucci - A project organization on the generation, review, training to, and distribution of procedures and instructions including the associated manuals.
The audit will include both vendor and contractor procedures, GAI procedures and GE procedures.
Audit activities will be conducted both in Reading and on Site.
PIA 81-1-05 Nuclear Test Section February Program Areas:
Quality Assurance Program, T. Ross - LA Completed w/o 2-9-81.
Instructions, Procedures and Drawings A. Lambacher - AIT A. Pollard - A This audit will emphasize the preparation of Nuclear Test's Electrical Test / Calibration Procedure, I&C Test / Calibration ?rocedures, and
o
' h i!N!!
iht t/23/81 PIA 81-15 Nuclear Test Section Audit Team Status March Program Areas:
Calibration of M.'asuring and F. A. Colon - LA Audit scope expanded to in-Test Equipment P. Kelly - A clude entire Project - new T. Boss - A PIA number for this nudit This audit will review controls for the NTS PIA 81-15.
Formerly scheduled Calibration program for Measuring and Test for January 1981 as PIA
' Equipment on Site and at Miles Test Lab.
81-1-04.
PIA 81-1-06 Nucicar Test Section March Program Areas:
Inspection J. Lausberg - LA No change.
A. Hurbanck - A This audit will emphasize Test Specification S. Everett - AIT and Review, acceptance test procedures, and the identification of Quality Inspection Points.
PIA 81-1-07 Nuclear Test Section, March T. Boss - LA No change.
Program Areas: Test Control
+
S. Everett - AIT This audit will evaluate Nuc1 car Test's ac-A. Hurbanck - A tivities regarding test scheduling, tu rnover process, and the start-up system scoping preparation.
PIA 81-11 GAI Engineering Project Management April This audit will evaluate the adherence of GAI B. Walrath - LA Formerly scheduled for Project Management to the commitments of the October. Has been advanced GAI Engineering Interface (Volume 4).
to April 1981.
This audit will be conducted both at Reading and on Site.
PIA 81-1-08 Nucicar Test Section April Program Arcas:
Test Control T. Boss - LA No change.
S. Everett - AIT This audit will evaluate the controls placed on A. Pollard - A the conducting of preoperational and acceptance tests, and re-tests.
l ;)
di]
ll.{.n/23/81.
4
,3 PIA 81-4 Material Control Audit Team Status April J. Lausberg - LA No change.
Program Areas:
Control of Purchased Materials; Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, J. Jaskiel - A and Components; Handling, Storage and Shipping; T. Swansiger - A Inspection; Inspection, Test and Operating Status This audit will evaluate the controls placed upon the purchase of material rcgarding inspec-tion prior to shipment, and the controls placed by warehouse on the identification, handling, storage, and maintenance of OWNER supplied equipment.
This audit will include project coverage on the field maintenance of equipment released to contractors.
i j
This audit will be conducted on Site.
i I
PIA 81-8 Specification, ECN Control April Program Areas: Design Control; Document Control C. T111 sky - LA Formerly scheduled for G.
Earley - A July 1981.
This audit will evaluate design control measures T. Swansiger - A i
for the generation, review and revision of speci-M. Massucci - A fications and ECNs including the control of these documents to and from the contractors / vendors.
The audit will include emphasis on the establish-ment and timeliness of Date Certains, the use of l
Field Questions, and Field Varicnce Authoriz."-
tions.
The audit will be conducted both at Reading and on Site.
The Reading portion will include the CAI in-volvement in the Test specifications for Nuclear Test.
t
-l -: -
o Q;
]j l}j'23/81 1
~.
PIA 81-1-09 Nuclear Test Section Audit Team Status April Program Areas:
Inspect ion, Test, and Operating S. Everett - AIT No change.
Status; Control of Measuring and Test Equipment M. Tepsick - A i
This audit will evaluate Nuc1 car Test's Safety, l
Jurisdictional and special tagging, and their control of equipment such as lifted leads, jumpers and mechanical items.
I PIA 81-1-10 Nuclear Test Section Program Areas:
Inspection, Test and Operation S. Everett - AIT No change.
Status M. Tepsick - A This audit will evaluate Nuclear Test's ac-l tivities regarding Construction follow and walk-down, deficiency tracking, and h,ndling of field l
questions.
PIA 81-1-11 Nuclear Test Section i
j May Program Areas:
Control of Measuring and Test T. Boss - LA No change.
Equipment S. Everett - AIT i
l J. Jaskici - A l
This audit will evaluate Nuclear Test's ac-R. Colon - A l
tivities regarding the control aad calibration of plant instrumentation.
i PIA 81-5 Quality Assurance Program Audit 1
May This audit will center mainly on evaluating the No change.
i activities of NQAD, but will also evaluate areas j
outside of the department. General areas to be l
1 evaluated include:
i Program Development and Control j
Audit Program Effectiveness
+
1 Organization i
i Q
?
i
}
Sbi f0I ijhj[23/81
^
PIA 81-6 Nonconformance and Corrective Action Audit Tenja Status May Program Areas:
Nonconformance Materials, Parts, J. Bahleda - LA No change.
or Components; Corrective Action T. Boss - A A. Lambacher - AIT This audit will evaluate process (ng of all non-conformances and corrective action isteed by Project Organization, vendor, and CAI/QAD person-nel.
It will include the generation, tracking, and verification of all nonconformances and corrective action. The audit will also include 4
the associated conditional release system on i
site as well as the method for evaluating signif-icant deficiencies, j-This audit will be conducted both in Reading and on Site.
5 PIA 81-7 Procurement Control June Program Areas:
Procurement Document Control J. Fronckowiak - A No change.
A. Lambacher - A This audit will evaluate the p'rocessing and con-D. Benjamin - A i
trol of purchase agreements, purchase orders, (TAS)
I 2
PCWAs and professional service agreements.
It will include the procurement of spare parts, status of Qualified Bidders List, Qualified s
I Vendors List, and the current vendor evaluations.
1 This audit will be conducted on Site.
1 l
i
]
jdh '
ll}/23/81.
"i id'p7 n
PIA 81-3 Drawing control Audit Team Status J
June Program Areas:
Design Control; Document Control P. Kelly - LA Formerly scheduled for March.
A. Lambacher - AIT Deferred until month of June This audit will evaluate design control measures R. Luse - AIT in order to advance PIA 81-08.
a for the generation, review, and revision of draw-J. Hayes - A Ings, the control and distribution of drawings
'up to the point of transmittal to contractors /
vendors, the receipt of contractor / vendor drawings, and the handling of as-built drawings.
All Project Organizations involved In, these pro-cesses will be evaluated.
Audit activities will be conducted in Reading l
and on Site.
1 PIA 81-9 Records
~
August l
Program Areas:
Quality Assurance Records R. Solt - LA No change.
W. Humphries - A l
This audit will evaluate the definition, status J. Jaskiel - A and control of project organization's records.
J. Hayes - A Emphasis will be placed on the Records Manage-ment Section.
The audit will include NRC type record documents.
This audit will be conducted both at Reading and on Site.
PIA 81-10 Indoctrination and Training September Program Areas:
Quality Assurance Program G. Vinciquerra - LA No change.
G. T111 sky - A This audit will evaluate all the Indoctrination L. Rougeux - A and training programs of all project organiza-tions.
Emphasis will be on the Training and Administration Section.
This audit will be conducted on Site.
?
hi
')
i[h'23/81 -
PIA 81-12 Fire Protection / Security Audit Team Sta tus 4
October
'this audit will combine both of these areas which J. Lausberg - LA No change.
are not fully covered under the entire QA pro-J. Hayes - A gram. The Fire Protection audit w111' evaluate E. Condo - A impicmentation to the commitments of PAP 0206.
.The Security portion will evaluate the design commitments to Regulatory Guide 1.17, "Protec-4 i
tion of Nucicar Power Plants against Industrial Sabotage", and ANSI N18.17 " Industrial Security Plans for Nuclear Power Plants", as well as the handling of security documents.
This audit will be conducted both on Site and at Reading.
PIA 81-13 GAI Program Managemeg November This audit will evaluate the adherence of GAI/
T. Swansiger - LA No change.
QAD Program Managecent to the GAI Quality T. Boss - A Assurance Program plant for PNPP.
V. Higaki - A 1
This audit will be conducted in Reading.
PIA 81-14 Perry Operations Department November This audit will evaluate the pregram development /
V. Higaki - LA No change.
Implementation and organization of the Perry T. Boss - A Plant Department.
L. Rougeux - A K. Combs - A 6
This audit will be conducted on Site.
The 1981 audit schedule was developed to cover all the applic-abic portions of the Corperate Nuclear Quality Assurance Pro-gram.
282/Ii?/kd i
I
[
(did'.
ME!!O TO:
D. R. Davidson j f) M[p TR0ll:
QA Advisory Committee DATE:
. Fbrch 8, 1981.
SUBJECT:
QA Advisory Committee Minutes of Meeting held on March 5 and 6, 1961 The QA Advisory Committee (Mr. E. V. Knox and Mr. N. R. Barker) met on Ibrch 5 and 6,1981 at the Perry Nuclear Power Station to review the CEI quality assurance program for preoperational testing. On Thursday, March 5, the Advisory Cocmittee reviewed applicable procedures and documents and held discussions with the PQS General Supervisor, Operations Quality Control Supervisor, Quality Engineers and Inspectors. Discussions uere also held with the NTS General Supervisor and two of his Test Engineers.
On Friday, !! arch 6, the QA Advisory Committee met with M. R. Edelman, G.
W. Groscup, J. Walden and R. Farrell to discuss our findings and observa-tions concerning tlie preoperational quality assurance program. The following is a summary of the meeting and the QA Advisory Committee recommendations:
a.
Quality Assurance Procedures
')
, Programmatic procedures that establish the framework for the preoperational test program appear to be adequate. The; basic-ally e::tablish responsibilities and interf aces between PQS and NTS. However, lower tier implementing procedures have not been formalized.
It is recommended by the QA Advisory Committee that procedurts are especially needed' for the situations when NTS performs work by internal work authorization instead of having subcontracters do thc' work.
b.
PQS Staff to Support Preoperational Testing As recommended at the last Advisory Committee 1:eeting, PQS has
~
issued a list that assigns a Quality Engineer for each system.
However, it was indicated that the assigned Quality Engineer has other duties and r'esponsibilities in support of construction, such as vendor surveillance and audits, and thus is not dedi-cated wholly to support of preoperational testing.
It was pointed out that several additional Quality Engineers have been requisitioned to support this area.
It is recon = ended by the QA Advisory Committee that three of four Quality Engineers with preoperational testing experience be assigned to support this phase of the program.
9
.{
r D. R. DIvidctn March 8, 1981
. age 2 s
c.
PQS Interface with NTS The quality assurance interface with NTS is not well defined but appears to be a triangle. The Test Engineer has an interface
.with Operations Quality Control and an interf ace with the assigned System Quality Engineer. There is also a PQS internal interface between the assigned System Quality Engineer and Operations Qual-ity Control personnel which is not well defined. Although the primary interface appears to be between the Test Engineer and the Quality Engineer; in actual practice, the interface is between the Test Engineer and the Operations Ouality Control group and is confusing the communications channels.
It is recommended that a singular interface be established within PQS to support the NTS preoperational test program.
d.
Test Procedure Review NTS test procedures are sent to the PQS for review. They are reviewed both by Quality Engineering and Quality Control, and a single set of comments is sent back.to the NTS Test Engineer.
From a very small sample of the comments being sent back, it appeared most of them were from Quality Control and dealt with the technical aspects of the procedure; and in addition, ap-(1) peared to be dealing with minor items such as using "shall" instead of "should", use of the PNPP and making it mandatory that the Lead Test Engineer approve some actions that are allowed by the test procedure. There also appeared to be a general con-sensus from the Test Engineers that'very rigid operational re-quirements were being imposed by Quality Control for incorpora-tion into the preoperational test procedures.
It is the recommendation by the QA Advisory Committee that the guideline procedure be reviewed to deter =ine th,e scope and ex-tent of the PQS review of preoperational test procedures.
One case was found where a chenge was authorized by the response to a Field Question (FQ #9771). This involved 781P6 being in-stalled when it should be 781N6 per the specification. The re-sponse to the FQ stated that Model 781P6 is an acceptable al-ternate but there was no indication that the specification was going to be changed.
When equipment and systems have completed the procurement, con-struction and installation phases, a known configuration baseline has been established and is documented by inspection records.
When the system is turned over for preoperational test, it is essential that any configuration change to the hardware be ap-propriatel'y documented and authorized by the A-E.
4;I
.S
- 3. R. Davidctn March 8, 1981 Page 3 d
it is recommended by the QA Advisory Committee that procedures be reviewed to assure that they very cicarly define the ground rules for maintaining configuration during preoperational test-ing.
The next QA Advisory Committee Meeting is scheduled for June 11 and 12, 1981.
Murray Edelman recommended that part of the time be set aside for a discussion between himself, his three General Supervisors and the Advisory Coc:mittee with regard to long range planning and staffing.
cce Edelman G. W. Groscup J. J. Waldron E. V. Knox N. R. Barker R. Farrell o
W 6
4 4
- I
Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program 0200 Rev. 3 Effective 4 / 6 /81 Page 3 of 4 References are addressed in detail in the eighteen sections which comprise this M:nual. The requirements of this program shall be implemented in accor-d nce with detailed procedure and instruction manuals.
All procedures and instructions shall be approved and established, with training accomplished, prior to the start of the activities being con-trolled. Issuance, distribution, and revisicns shall be controlled to preclude the use of obsolete documents.
$h
~
hhQdk.1N)Od $id MMi;dogIainbi((r'e[8 J
cuidae 3=nM=EW4WN=V4E=VNMn ede ' (ANSIL _a(re. prime'nidd]6 '5ypyh ttrespectatost4reoguitle4tdeWpr.cy.ided :hy,rQual tQrogram"Regula'tbry3 1.4 MANAGEMENT REVIEW AND EVALUATION Overall assessment of the scope, implementation and adequacy of the Quality Assurance l'rogram shall be cT.de by the QA Advisory Committee.
This committee consists of the Manager, NQAD, as chairman, the Managers, Nuclear Engineering and Perry Plant Departments; with QA management representatives from Kaiser Engineers, Gilbert Associates, and other agents, as approved by the chairman. This committee is chartered to parforin quarterly reviews of the program and to report the results through the Manager, NQAD, to top CEI management through corporate reporting channels. These reviews shall be documented and shall incorporate the input provided by:
c a.
The person 31 assessments of QA agent representytfve.".o st the committee.
b.
Audit trend analysis provided by the Prog Quality Section (PQS) and Training / Administration Section.
c.
Nonconformance trend analysis provided by the Construction Quality Section (CQS), Training / Administration Section and Program Quality Section.
d.
Corrective Action Request evaluations provided by the General Supervising Engineers, PQS and CQS.
e.
Evaluations provided by outside audit groups or QA Task Forces which may be organized by the QA Advisory Committee to provide specialized input.
f.
Conventional management appraisal and analysis techniques.
1.5 RESOLUTION OF PROGRAM IMPASSES Disputes arising from the interp'retat' ion of the Nuclear Quality Assurance Program shall be resolved at the lowest possible level.
l N
b.k=b
.v o.
- e m-A Tio Cisv:Irnd Electric tilaminitlig Compoxy A R, 0, 0, L "EVj*
NUCLEAR QUALITY ASSURANCE DEPT.
/
ACTION REQUEST Audit Number 5, h,3, t'
File No., 3,0,117,0,31 1, B Criteria No.
M Activity Name, P, P, P,
, 0, h, h, Y8I Prepared By:
M. Brovn/R. Hollenbeck Initials. R. H.
Date
,0,6l1,918,1, Appendix B Criteria: XEI - Nonconforping Materials Pullman Power Products could not provide documentation to verify the Observation:ir or inspection for closed NR's 406 and 463.
repa Investigation revealed the repair for NR h86 was not accomplished. NR 463 was closed by reference to NR h86.
Review for Significance:
vd/i Justification:
PPP XV-2 Pr cedure for Handling Nonconformances (field)
Recommendation: This NR should be recuened. Please explain how this NR was closed without verification that the verk vas done. The auditor sugcests that all documentation relative to verifv elesure of NRs be attached and beeone a tart of the NR.
PFr.ElVED
- r. F R 4, r 1082 pNpo eRF Acknowledged By:
V
/
/
Action Due By Date
.O.710.3 8,2, Corrective Action Repiv: This NR was closed by mistake and has been recoened until work
~
has been accomplished. A study will be initiated to assure that there is supportino documentation for all closed NR's.
Response By:
J. E. Miller Response Date D 61238.1.
Follow-Up: Last Action Date 1)dfriG38/>
Comment:.
', d62 7 18E'O.A
- PPP/50'* Ghlb}ld 2LNIOUS Comment:
- PPfi/.Sa# Sie S4 f 3)0 & O 5 8 2r Response Evaluation:
' F b) /CdM 3 $~ 89' OA s
c2/.2/ 2P-F%c streefse w /K&n n icofr C(As n eeds mee inht WA-o s2/os-/2.z. OM s2 Er p s-pm/sc#S454'(2) and AuM Mo MY$ '
M [b)A Close-out Date df IMI N QA Approval:
J v.,ma m. MI /h bA
//
o41 SLOd )
d u~m -. inn n-..
'3 A Wheelabrator - Frye Company e.
i Perry Nuclear Power Plant Post Offee Box 209 7
Pullman Power Products s'einfo"e%'$*159-4898 PY-PPP/SO #5626(E)
PO#P-1315-L/SP-44/45 PO#P-1486-Z/SP-47 PPP Job #7026 February 2, 1982 Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P.O. Box 97 Perry, Ohio 44081 Attention: Mike Brown CQE Lead Construction Auditor
Subject:
Nonconformance Reports Dear Sir; In accordance with our response to your finding AR-001 on Audit No. 543, we have conducted a study of closed Nonconformance Reports and have found sufficient evidence to support their closing.
Very Truly Yo s,' JJ ff n&/J R. E. Hunnicutt QA Supervisor REH/ PAC
?
cc:
R. T. Walter (File 3.3.3)
J. E. Miller J. Hubbuch J. Townsend P0/DC (2)
-\\
(
- p A Wheelabrator - Frye Company f
Perry Nuclear Power Plant Post orfice Box 209 Pery. Ono 440ei Pullman Power Products reieon-e ms> 2s9-4898 gl PY-PPP/S0 #5654(E)
PO#P-1315-L/SP-44/45 P0#P-1486-Z/SP-47 PPP Job #7026 REF:
PY-PPP/SO #5626(E)
February 5, 1982 Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company P.O. Box 97 Perry, Ohio 44081 Attention: Mike Brown s
CQE Lead Construction Auditor
Subject:
Nonconformance Reports
Dear Sir:
To further clarify the study conducted by us in response to your finding AR-001 on Audit #543, PPP discovered problems as noted with the following nonconformances.
NCR PPP 248 (Attachment A) was closed on the basis of scrapping Items "B", "C" and "D" (see Attachment B) and requisition of new material.
This NCR was reopened until reinstallation is completed as required by the NCR.
NCR PPP 286 (Attachment C) was closed on the basis of a " scrap" dis-position.
It was reopened until Spool 15-AB on 2P42-41 (Attachment D) is cut and rewelded as required by the NCR.
NCR PPP 298 (Attachment E) was closed on the basis of the rewelding of Item "B" on 2P45-H031 (Attachment F).
It was reopened until identification of code plate is verified and in-struction of personnel is performed as required by the NCR.
NCR PPP 310 (Attachment G) was closed since new material was requisitioned to replace the " scrapped" Item "B" on 1E12-H446 (Attachment H) and 1E12-H465 (Attachment I).
It was reopened until the
" scrapped" items are cut out and actually scrapped as re-quired by the NCR.
N,
Pullmrn PcwIr Pr ducts h
PY-PPP/SO#5654(E)
Page 2 February 5, 1982 NCRPPP535(AttachmentJ)wasclosedonbasisoftheadditionofthe coupling on IC11-822 (Attachment K).
It was reopened until the ell is relocated as required by the NCR.
NCR PPP 491 (Attachment L) was closed since the items had been cut out and instruction performed.
It was reopened until rewelding of hanger 1C11-H042 is done as required by the NCR.
The above NCR's will be closed upon completion of all required work and before documentation turnover.
Very Truly Yours, 77 '
)
R. E. Hunnicutt QA Supervisor REH/ pac 7
cc:
R. T. Walter (File 3.3.3)
J. E. Miller J. Hubbuch J. Townsend P0/DC (2) t
\\'
i 4
'O Tile CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUInlN ATING C0f0PAi!Y P.o. box 5000 e CLEVELAND. oHlo 44101 e TELEPHONE (216) 622-9800 m ILLUMINATING BLDG.
e 55 PUBLICSoVARE Senting The Best Location in the Nation August 4, 1981 MR. NORM BARKER Gilbert Associatee MR. D. HOWARD Kaiser Engineers, Inc.
GENTLEMEN:
I would like to use the next meeting of the QA Advisory Committee, which is sched-uled for September 3 and 4, to outline the areas which the Committee should be addressing during 1982.
Since three of us are in new roles, either in our Corpor-ation or in relation to Quality Assurance activities, we should preface the work scope definition by defining the role of the advisory Committee itself.
To help with this process, even though it is redundant for Murray Edelman and Norm Barker, I have outlined a brief history of the Committee, attached a copy of the "PNPP QA Program Management Evaluation Team Report" and a copy of our out-standing NRC issues.
In addition, within this letter, I've written my ideas of what the Committee's role should be now, and the areas we might consider reviewing during 1982.
The QA Advisory Committee came into being in 1978 after the NRC's issuance of an immediate action letter to the Project Organization along with an attendant "stop work" order. The purpose of the Committee at that time was to provide overall guidance in establishing the program required to address the findings outlined in the NRC document.
It also provided access to the highest Quality Management level in each of the three Corporations where action could be initiated.
It also, frankly, provided expertise (in the case of GAI and KEI representatives) which l
CEI did not have.
Throughout 1978, 1979 and most of 1980 the Committee functioned l
in the'over-view role.
Late in 1980, the Committee began to be more involved in planning aspects, with those aspects of the Quality program more associated with anticipating problems and areas of future concern. The planning area will continue l
to have'the most emphasis in the upcoming year, although we still need to maintain the independent overview of " hew are we doing now".
With this perspective in mind, I would submit the following objectives for the Committee:
1.
To evaluate the performance of various aspects of the present Construc-l tion Quality Program to assure that the present program is functioning well. The evaluaticn would assure that organization is appropriate j
to support the program, that manning levels are correct, that personnel are trained and ;ompetent in their respective areas, and that measures of performance are present. This evaluation would be at an overviev l
level, not at that of a detailed audit.
G
/R
l mL Messrs. Barker and Howard
[-
August 4, 1981 Page Two 2.
To review plans and directions in programs now under development or in a state of change to determine that such plans take cognizance of I
present and future regulatory requirements and that the experience of other utilities are factored into programs under development here.
3.
To provide a forum for the discussion of Quality Assurance issues that brings to bear expertise and objectivity from outside the existing Project Organization.
With these objectives in mind, the areas I would propose addressing during 1982 are as follows:
1.
A review of the status of the Quality Assurance program associated with Start-Up activities, including the Turn-Over process.
2.
Other specific areas of the existing Construction Quality Program.
3.
Various planned aspects of the developing Operational QA Program, such as:
a.
Receipt Inspection b.
Design responsibilities for the Operational phase c.
Spare Part procurement d.
Training and Certification e.
Importance to Safety - What's a balanced approach If each of you would make the same attempt to outline the charter and the areas of interest for the QA Committee, I will collect them and put them together and send advanced copies to each of you so that we can make maximum use of our meeting time..
If you would like to. talk about this prior to the meeting or if you have any questions, please call me.
Very truly yours,
$fY e
R. L. Farrell, Manager Nuclear Quality Assurance Dept.
RLF/llp Attachment M.
R'. Edelman, M. J. Titas, J. J. Waldron cc:
k
.m
i PERRif NUCLEA3 POWER PLANT PR2 JECT oRGANIZATloN I EO IE7gir with (B receiva this mrtarial.
,i THE CLEVELAND ELECTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY A ND KAISER ENGINEERS. INC.
, w.erev.s.so MEMORANDUM PAac wo.
R. L. Farrell ROOM S260 FROM mbs DATE August 3, 1981 PHONE 257 RDOM W160 Rggg Y sus :ccr Open NRC Findings - PNPP ED AUG 4 198; The attached list of open NRC findings issued against PNPP reflects th00fLL status from IE Reports received to date.
The list is in chronological order and identifies the NRC finding number, whether the finding is an item of noncompliance or an unresolved item, and the Severity Level of those noncompliances identified af ter January 1, 1981.
In parenthesis are the names of the P/0 individuals to whom the finding has been referred for resolution. Additionally, "Date of Full Compliance" represents the date to which CEI committed in the letters responding to Notices of Violation.
MKC/pab Attachment cc:
B. L. Barkley L. O. Beck M. R. Edelman P. L. Gibson C. W. Hunter W. J. Kacer J. Kline M. R. Kritzer G. R. Leidich
.P.
P. Martin J. W. Mehaffey K. R. Pech R. R. Rinderman R. L. Vondrasek B. D. Walrath 401.MKC KEY:
U = Unresolved Item N/D = Noncompliance / Deficiency N/I = Noncompliance / Infraction V/V = Noncompliance / Severity Level V Violation
G / {bU I
MEMO TO:
D. R. Davidson RECElVED FROM:
QA Advisory Committee M/3 t
AUG.11 198; DATE:
August 6, 1981 I
d
SUBJECT:
QA Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes -
June 11 and 12, 1981 Meeting The QA Advisory Committee met at the PNPP Site on June 11 and.12, 1981.
This was the first meeting since Mr. R. Farrell was appointe'd a's QA Mhnager. The first day included a continuation of the considerations of the previous meeting in March relative to NTS and Opera:Jous QA. The second day was spent in a general discussion among M. Edelman, R. Farrell, J. Waldron, N. Barker and E. Knox of observations made during the previous day. The following highlights were covered during the discussion:
1.
It was noted that several organization changec had been made in the QA group. These increased the PQS QA support attention to the test and Operations QA activity as was discussed in March.
Assignment of PQE's to support various testing responsibilities also had been made.
2.
A corrective action request (81-01) had been issued to resolve noted problems in the turnover area.
Several discussions with B. Walrath, T. Fetterman, J. Marginin, R. Vondresic and T. Boss indica,ted-that issues remain that require attention with respect to coordination of the turnover and startup QA activity.
3.
Discussions on Operations QA programs included the planning of visits to Duke Power, Public Service Electric & Gas and Common-wealth Edison to re*iew approaches on Operations QA programs.
Several ideas were discussed reflecting trends on Operations QA.
4.
The next meeting was scheduled for September 3 and 4, 1981.
l 1
cc:
M. R. Edelman M
G. W. Groscup J. J. Waldron E. V. Knox N. R. Barker
f
.Ad.
PET,RY NUCLEA2 POWER PLANT PROJECT o*.GANLZATION
] na lEngir with to reesive this material.
Tile CLEVELAND CLCCTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY M E Y d5k"$ $ b U M PAGE NO.
PN 6 REV. 6 -so tinyed (f[M DATE October 27, 1981 o
it. L.
1*arre11 RDOM S260 rnoM J. it.
PHONE 204 nooM W160 susaccr1982 Project Internal Audit Schedule s-Attached is the Project Internal Audit Schedule for 1982.
The schedule was prepared in accordance with Training /
Administration Section Procedure 8-1803, " Project Internal Audits". The schedule has been reviewed by NQAD and Project Organization General Supervising Engineers / General Supervisors with their comments being incorporated Manning for these audits is being pursued at this moment.
Changes to the schedule will be made to meet changing Project activity as appropriate.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact either Vern !!1gaki or myself.
JRH:pab Attachment cc: 401.JRH 405.200 b
4 M
- E. ~
l.
[$!^Al -
i s;
L P.
PROJECT INTERNAL AUDIT SCHEDULE FOR 1982 A
Revision 0
Date October 26, 1981 t
Prepared by:
pamesR. Hayes g
Quality Engineer Training / Administration Section Revieued by:
f YV 44 : Io/*G/84 VeYnon K. Higaki
(/
Audit Coordinator Training / Administration Section d
YsT.
/*f2fh/
Paul P. Martin General Supervising Engineer l
Training / Administration Section i
1
ITr y
1982 Project Intern Audit Schidule O
Audit Team Status NDE Administration January This nudit will cover activitL:n of the NDE Administration group of T/AS. Thu neope will be determined at a later date.
Close-out of Open Action Requests January This audit will pursue close-out of outstanding ARs and will be performed again in April, July and October.
As-Built Drawings January This audit will evaluate design control ceasures for the generation, review and control of as-built drawings.
Nuclear Test Section February Program Areas: Test Control; Inspection, Test and Operating Status i
This audit will evaluate the controls placed by Project Organization on conduct of tests, test status, documentation of tests results, evalua-tion of test results and records. Emphasis will be on NTS initial check and run-in and pre' opera-tional testing activities.
GAI Engineering Project Management February This audit will evaluate the adherence of GAI Project Management to the coccitments of the CAI Engineering Interface (Volume 4).
This audit will be conducted at Reading and on Site.
f a
8/18/8 s..
Fumi Precurement Audit Tern Status
/2%
~~~
February This audit will evaluate the ef fectiveness of the Project's fuel procurement activities.
Emphasis will be on the Fuel Buying, Engineering and Pro-gram Quality Section activities.
Quality Assurance Program Audit February This audit will focus on the activities of NQAD and additionally evaluate areas outelde of the depart-ment. General areas to be evaluated include:
Program Development and Cor. trol Audit Program Effectiveness Organization Inspection March Program Areas:
Inspection; Inspection, Test and Operating Status This audit will evaluate the program for inspecting test activities affecting quality.
Emphasis will be on PQS preplanned and random inspection activi-ties, surveillances, inspection records and certifi-cation of inspection personnel.
Nuclear Test Section March Program Areas: Calibration of Measuring and Test Equipment This audit will review controls for the project calibration program for measuring and test equipment on Site and at Miles Test Lab. The audit will also review the calibration program for plant instrumentation.
I
C/LCIDL
()
Autit Team Status b
Instruction and Procedure Control P. arch Program Areas:
Instructions, Procedures, and Drawings; Document Control This audJt will evaluate the controls placed by Pro-ject Organization on the generation, review, training and distribution of procedures end instructions in-cluding the associated canuals.
The audit will be conducted in Reading and on Site.
Nonconformance and Corrective Action April Program Areas: Nonconforming Haterials, Parts, or Components; Corrective Action This audit will evaluate processing of all nonconfor-mances and corrective action issued by Project Organi-zation, vendor and GAI/QAD personnel.
It will include the generation, tracking and verification of all nonconformances and corrective action. The audit will also include the associated conditional release system on Site.
This audit will be conducted in Reading and on Site.
NRC-Related Activities A;:11 This audic will evaluate the methods for evaluating and reporting significant deficiencies and for re-sponding to the NRC Inspection -nd Enforcement Reports, Bullettns and Circulars, Generic Letters and other NRC requests for information. FSAR revision mechanisms will also be considered for inclusion.
8
8/18/81 S
O'-
3
(
Drawing Control Audit Tcan Statua
. j. p
. j May
.
- y' Program Areas: Design Control; Document Control This audit will evaluate design control measures for the generation, review, and revision of drawings, the control and distribution of drawings up to the point of transmittal to contractors / vendors, the receipt of contractor / vendor drawings, and the handling of as-built drawings. As l Project Organi-zations involved in these processes will be evaluated.
Audit activities will be conducted in Reading and on Site.
Nuclear Test Section Y2y Program Areas: Test Control This audit will evaluate the controls placed on NTS turnover activities.
Included in the audit will be activities regarding test scheduling and the start-up system scoping preparation.
Material Control June Program Areas: Control of Purchased Materials; Identification and Control of Materials, Parts, and Components; Handling, Storage and Shipping; Inspec-tion; Inspection, Test and Operating Status This audit will evaluate the controls placed upon the purchase of material including spare parts regarding inspection prior to shipment, and the controls placed by warehouse on the identification, handling, storage, and maintenance of OWNER supplied equipment. This audit will include project coverage on the field maintenance of equip-ment released to contractors.
This audit will be conducted on Site.
r
~D..._
C/BW/WL
, y9 y
d @6, s %
{}
g g
(
Audtt Tenm Statun Procurccent Control "Mykl June Program Areas:
Procurement Document Control
%g]
This audit will evaluate the processing and control of purchase agreements, purchase orders, PCWAs and professional service agreements.
It will in-clude the procurement of spare parts, status of Qualified Bidders List, Qualified Vendors List, and the current vendor evaluaticns.
This audit will be conducted on Site.
Nuclear Test Section
- uly Program Areas:
Inspection, Test and Operating Status; Control of Ifeasuring and Test Equipment This audit will evaluate NTS safety, jurisdic-tional and special tagging and their control of equipment such as lifted leads, jumpers and mechanical items.
Tornover
- uly Program Areas: Test Control This audit will evaluate implementation and program adequacy of procedures for turnover and post turnover activities.
This audit will be conducted on Site.
Radiological and Environmental fionitoring August This audit will evaluate the radiological and environ-mental monitoring program. The audit will include the ambient radiation level, water, air particulate and the milk and garden monitoring programs.
This audit will be conducted on Site and at NUS Corporation.
f
__ _ ~.
Recorda Audit Team Statua August Program Areas: Quality Assurance Records This audit will evaluate the datinition, status and control of project organization's records.
Emphasis will be placed on the Records Management Section.
This audit will be conducted both at Reading and on Site.
Indoctrination and Training September Program Areas: Quality Assurance Program
{
This audit will evaluate all the indoctrination and training programs of all project organizations.
]
Emphasis will be on the Training and Administration Section..
- 1his audit will be conducted on Site.
Specification and ECN Control September Program Areas: Design Control; Document Control This audit will evaluate design control measures for i
the generation, review and revision of specifications and ECN's including the control of these documents to and from the contractors / vendors. The audit will j
include emphasis on the establishreent and timeliness of Date Certains, the use of Field Questions and 1
}
Field Variance Authorizations.
The audit will be conducted both at Reading and on i
Site.
i Pre-Service Inspection September Program Arcas:
Inspection, Control of Special 4
l Processes, Quality Assurance Program, Organization i
1
{
This audit will evaluate the controls placed on j
the pre-service inspection program.
~r This audit will be conducted on-site and at NES.
O
. Audit Tena Stetut Fire Prctrction/
urity October This nadit will combine both of these arena which are not fully covered under the entire QA program.
The Fire Protection audit will evaluate implementa-tion to the commitments of PAF 0206. The Security portion will evaluate the design commitments to Regulatory Guide 1.17, " Protection of Nuclear Power Plants against Industrial Sabotage," and ANSI N18.17
" Industrial Security Plans for Nuclear Power Plants,"
as well as the handling of security documents.
This audit will be conducted both on Site and at Reading.
GAI Program >fanagement November This audit will evaluate the adherence of GAI/QAD Program Management to the GAI Quality Assurance Pro-gram plant for PNPP.
This audit will be conducted in Reading.
Operations November This survey will evaluate the program development /
implementation for the Operations phase. Included will be coverage of PAPO's and the Perry Plant Department.
O a
. _ _ _ _