ML20086D818: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:. | {{#Wiki_filter:._ | ||
f l' | f l' | ||
&/ | |||
J | |||
i | ~ | ||
NSP l | |||
l i | |||
l NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY M IN N E A PO L.a s. M IN N E SOTA S S401 June 7, 1976 | |||
- x | |||
Mr Victor Stello, Director | .x s - | ||
:U N | |||
cu, ;.,7;f | '\\ | ||
D Dj[5 | |||
Washington, DC | ,.; ~, | ||
: 1. , , | Mr Victor Stello, Director i~h % jJg. y, T. | ||
Division of Operating Reactors (y';3 cu, ;.,7;f | |||
'( | |||
U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission | |||
,?/ | |||
i Washington, DC 20555 | |||
: 1.,,, | |||
s | s | ||
'Q@, | |||
==Dear Mr Stello:== | ==Dear Mr Stello:== | ||
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22 I | |||
Response to 5/20/76 Inquiry Concerning LPCI Design | |||
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22 Response to 5/20/76 Inquiry Concerning | ) | ||
i Your {{letter dated|date=May 20, 1976|text=May 20, 1976 letter}} identified a potential design deficiency related to LPCI pump cavitation and motor overload. Monticello has the Loop Selection Logic System and does not have the LPCI modification. Therefore, item a j | |||
i Your {{letter dated|date=May 20, 1976|text=May 20, 1976 letter}} identified a potential design deficiency related to LPCI pump cavitation and motor overload. Monticello has the Loop Selection Logic System and does not have the LPCI modification. Therefore, item a | of your letter is applicable and item b.is not. | ||
The Monticello piping layout and pump data have been reviewed. At runout | The Monticello piping layout and pump data have been reviewed. At runout | ||
[ | [ | ||
flow the NPSH requirements of the pump are met. | |||
The pump characteristic l | |||
curves show that at high flows, the brake horsepower and motor current de-A crease. | |||
Therefore, the Monticello LPCI pumps are not subject to damage due to cavitation or motor overload in the runout condition. | |||
( | ( | ||
Yours Very truly, L 0 Mayer, PE bb1 Manager, Nuclear Support Services LQ4/MHV/ deb cc: J G Keppler C Charnoff i | |||
Yours Very truly, L 0 Mayer, PE Manager, Nuclear Support Services | MPCA I | ||
Attn: | |||
J W Ferman 8312050151 780426 PDR ADOCK 05000263 g | |||
PDR COPY SENT REGION A_ | |||
._.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 02:24, 14 December 2024
Text
._
f l'
&/
J
~
NSP l
l i
l NORTHERN STATES POWER COMPANY M IN N E A PO L.a s. M IN N E SOTA S S401 June 7, 1976
- x
.x s -
- U N
'\\
D Dj[5
,.; ~,
Mr Victor Stello, Director i~h % jJg. y, T.
Division of Operating Reactors (y';3 cu, ;.,7;f
'(
U S Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,?/
i Washington, DC 20555
- 1.,,,
s
'Q@,
Dear Mr Stello:
MONTICELLO NUCLEAR GENERATING PLANT Docket No. 50-263 License No. DPR-22 I
Response to 5/20/76 Inquiry Concerning LPCI Design
)
i Your May 20, 1976 letter identified a potential design deficiency related to LPCI pump cavitation and motor overload. Monticello has the Loop Selection Logic System and does not have the LPCI modification. Therefore, item a j
of your letter is applicable and item b.is not.
The Monticello piping layout and pump data have been reviewed. At runout
[
flow the NPSH requirements of the pump are met.
The pump characteristic l
curves show that at high flows, the brake horsepower and motor current de-A crease.
Therefore, the Monticello LPCI pumps are not subject to damage due to cavitation or motor overload in the runout condition.
(
Yours Very truly, L 0 Mayer, PE bb1 Manager, Nuclear Support Services LQ4/MHV/ deb cc: J G Keppler C Charnoff i
MPCA I
Attn:
J W Ferman 8312050151 780426 PDR ADOCK 05000263 g
PDR COPY SENT REGION A_
._.