ML20138P537

Draft BNL Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station Technical Review Team Audit Plan for Area VI Nonconformance Reporting

ML20138P537
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date:	07/31/1984
From:	BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LABORATORY
To:
Shared Package
ML20138M609	List: ML20138M606 ML20138M651 ML20138M794 ML20138M800 ML20138M811 ML20138M820 ML20138M824 ML20138M832 ML20138M839 ML20138M847 ML20138M852 ML20138M864 ML20138M881 ML20138M892 ML20138M899 ML20138M915 ML20138M926 ML20138M943 ML20138M955 ML20138M959 ML20138M964 ML20138M970 ML20138M974 ML20138N671 ML20138N674 ML20138N677 ML20138N681 ML20138N686 ML20138N689 ML20138N692 ML20138N695 ML20138N697 ML20138N700 ML20138N703 ML20138N708 ML20138N712 ML20138N716 ML20138N718 ML20138N721 ML20138N818 ML20138N821 ML20138N825 ML20138N833 ML20138N841 ML20138N853 ML20138N861 ML20138N864 ML20138N868 ML20138N872 ML20138N876 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 PROC-840731-04, NUDOCS 8511070224
Download: ML20138P537 (8)

Text

f July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT 75" AUDIT PLAN for AREA VI NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING

~

Page 1 of 8 1.0 Identify procedures which describe and provide the functions of the nonconformance system for coatings.

Evaluate the functioning of the system; does the nonconformance system work to identify, disposition, and implement corrective action for nonconforming conditions?

• 00 l

e s.

0 8511070224 851016 PDR FOIA PDR GARDE 85-59 s

e J uly 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB.CPSES TRT

. 3-AUDIT PLAN for AREA VI NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING

- Page 2 of 8 2.0 Evaluate the performance of the system by which dispositioning of nonconforming conditions is conducted.

• 00 i

l, 2.1 Does the system provide for analysis of impact to other plant systems or components?

Is this system properly implemented?

2.2 Does the system provide for review to determine if dispositions affect GA/QC requirements?

Is this system properly implemented?

3..

i l

t

}

i i.

• =-

i 5

1

July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT l

AUDIT PLAN for AREA VI

==..~~

NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING Page 3 of 8 3.0 Resolution of unsatisfactory conditions is accomplished through Nonconformance Reports, Design Change Authorizations, and Unsatisfactory Inspection Reports.

• XX 3.1 Is there objective evidence that Nonconformance Reports for coatings are subjected to a regular periodic analysis to detect trends adverse to quality?

3.2 Is there objective evidence that Design Change Authorizations for coatings are subjected to a regular periodic analysis to detect trends adverse to quality?

3.3 Is there objective evidence that Unsatisfactory Inspection Reports for coatings are subjected to a regular periodic analysis to detect trends adverse to quality?

e d

.2:-.

i e

P J

,-,,9,,---c w

g

,.y

>%_m.-,--

w y_ _ _ _ _., _ _ _ _

m-g,

,n,.,

.,,-,.,,w,.w.77m-,-w g,--

=.

July 31, 19 84 Draft of

~'"

BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VI NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING Page 4 of 8 4.0 Review all Nonconformance Reports issued against coatings.

4.1 Identify the Nonconformance Reports with dispositions of

" Accept-as-is" or " Repair"; is there objective evidence that each was evaluated for inclusion in the EXEMPT LOG 7 4.2 Identify those not evaluated.

4.3 Verify that all dispositions evaluated for inclusion have been either entered into the EXEMPT LOG, or that the basis for exclusion from the EXEMPT LOG is justified on the Nonconformance Report.

• 3 8vII e

ga 6

i e

m.

July 31, 1984 Draft of

?;;;...

BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VI

"~~

NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING l

Page 5 of 8 1

1 Verify that an NCR has been prepared to identify the 5.0 practice of solvent-wiping power tool cleaned surfaces (as an alternative to the procedurally-supplied method of vacuuming or blowing-down the surface).

Verify the accuracy of the scope of the NCR as appropriate.

5.1 5.2 Verify that corrective action and measures to prevent*40 recurrence are adequate, and have been implemented.

v 4

, 7:::

l l

O I

z.:

July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VI NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING Page 6 of 8 6.0 Review NCR #C-83-01694 6.1 Verify that this report does not address the level of chlorides in the specified solvent solution (Econolemon Disinfectant Cleaner - Hospital Type.)

• 41

@VI 9

e

,?..

T...

23

't:.,.;.-

l July 31, 1984 Draft of BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT AUDIT PLAN for AREA VI

~~

NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING Page 7 of 8 7.0 Identify NCR's generated as a result of applying coatings to substrate or previously applied coatings without benefit of QC inspection.

7.1 Verify the identification and corrective action for the affected areas as documented by inspection reports.

• 50

• 52 e

7...

i i

8

.2,2 a

r.

,..n

.-,-,.-_,,,,,-...,---,,n.,,r.

-n

. - ~

,. - -. ~

---as

- a w=

July 31, 1984 Draft of 4

\\

[jir BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB CPSES TRT j

=i...

AUDIT PLAN for AREA VI NONCONFORMANCE REPORTING Page 8 of 8 8.0 Identify NCR's generated as a result of improper mixing or thinning of Phenoline #305.

• 51

@VI i

O t

2.:.

, -,