ML20237L711: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
VisualWikitext
StriderTol Bot insert
 
StriderTol Bot change
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:W*                                                                                               4 f
{{#Wiki_filter:W*
DO NOT DISCLOSE Jamary 9, 1986     E-x a , 67     330. I5
4 f
!          NEMORArtDUM POR:
DO NOT DISCLOSE Jamary 9, 1986 E-x a, 67 330.
I5 NEMORArtDUM POR:
Mark Emerson, A1101ation Coordinator TROM:
Mark Emerson, A1101ation Coordinator TROM:
T. P. Westerman. Chief Comanche Peak Recion IV Group 1           EUBJECT:
T. P. Westerman. Chief Comanche Peak Recion IV Group 1
!                              A11ecation 4-85-A-121 Individual A & B.I telephoned two individuals referenced by tum Young (Att achment I-j was it offered.       Neither individual requested confidentiality nor Project Assistant Corp.(PAC)    Individual A stated he is leaving his present employer
EUBJECT:
!        io leaving the site with the termination of the PACand is going 1986.                                                                          to work Individual   D for TUGCO.
A11ecation 4-85-A-121 Individual A & B.I telephoned two individuals referenced by tum Young (Att achment I-was it offered.
Neither individual requested confidentiality nor Project Assistant Corp. Individual A stated he is leaving his present employer j
(PAC) io leaving the site with the termination of the PACand is going to work for TUGCO.
Individual D 1986.
contract on January 17, i
contract on January 17, i
Ecch made the following statements:
Ecch made the following statements:
Line 29: Line 33:
Stated he had no concerns.
Stated he had no concerns.
2.
2.
but   that he was not aware of nany trending.
but that he was not aware of any problems with elS l
ngs problems with elS ectrical l
n ngs t
t
trending.
ectrical
(
(
Individual B
Individual B 1.
: 1.                                                                                         l Dio not identify any problems with electrical t
l Dio not identify any problems with electrical t rending.
rending.
2.
2.
He stated he did have a concern with inspecti on records of   electrical       terminations same as recorded on the inspection report.
He stated he did have a concern with inspecti of electrical terminations when the lugs were no on records ons same as recorded on the inspection report.
when        e the lugs were no ons sign ofoffterininm1 brand        was for   teminal blocks with The  lugsinspection when     the a t block didn't use lugs.                 c ual 3.
e sign off was for teminal blocks with lugs when the a t brand of terininm1 The inspection block didn't use lugs.
off the findings since the lugso did                   write not existHe stated this did not address the generic problestmproper doemmentation.
c ual 3.
ofHe i felt RIV CPG ENOT DISCLOSE WO cte.rmansww
off the findings since the lugs did not existHe stated o write this did not address the generic problest of i He felt doemmentation.
  /9/86 h
mproper RIV CPG ENOT DISCLOSE W cte.rmansww O
G O      5       5 l
/9/86 l
h O
5 5
G


                                      ~
~
f               i erson                                 '                         DO NOT DISCIDEE .,
f i
Jan. 9, 1986     '
erson
: 4.             Re recomunended that the SRRR reject files would identify all unsatisfactory inspector / inspection issues and that these could then be tracked to review QE corrective actions.
' DO NOT DISCIDEE Jan. 9, 1986 4.
: 5.             He stated he knew of no real hardware problems.
Re recomunended that the SRRR reject files would identify all unsatisfactory inspector / inspection issues and that these could then be tracked to review QE corrective actions.
: 6.             He indicated be did not trust the Safe Team.
5.
T. F. Westerman, Chief Comanche Pea. Region IV Group Encitsures Attachment 1 CCs C. Eale w/o att i
He stated he knew of no real hardware problems.
6.
He indicated be did not trust the Safe Team.
T. F. Westerman, Chief Comanche Pea. Region IV Group Encitsures CCs C. Eale w/o att i
i DO NOT DISCIDSE i}}
i DO NOT DISCIDSE i}}

Latest revision as of 06:14, 2 December 2024

Summarizes Telcon W/Individuals Ref by T Young Re Insp of Electrical Trending
ML20237L711
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak  
Issue date: 01/09/1986
From: Westerman T
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To: Emerson M
NRC
Shared Package
ML20237F760 List: ... further results
References
NUDOCS 8708200307
Download: ML20237L711 (2)
v • d • e


Text

W*

4 f

DO NOT DISCLOSE Jamary 9, 1986 E-x a, 67 330.

I5 NEMORArtDUM POR:

Mark Emerson, A1101ation Coordinator TROM:

T. P. Westerman. Chief Comanche Peak Recion IV Group 1

EUBJECT:

A11ecation 4-85-A-121 Individual A & B.I telephoned two individuals referenced by tum Young (Att achment I-was it offered.

Neither individual requested confidentiality nor Project Assistant Corp. Individual A stated he is leaving his present employer j

(PAC) io leaving the site with the termination of the PACand is going to work for TUGCO.

Individual D 1986.

contract on January 17, i

Ecch made the following statements:

Individual A 1.

Stated he had no concerns.

2.

but that he was not aware of any problems with elS l

n ngs t

trending.

ectrical

(

Individual B 1.

l Dio not identify any problems with electrical t rending.

2.

He stated he did have a concern with inspecti of electrical terminations when the lugs were no on records ons same as recorded on the inspection report.

e sign off was for teminal blocks with lugs when the a t brand of terininm1 The inspection block didn't use lugs.

c ual 3.

off the findings since the lugs did not existHe stated o write this did not address the generic problest of i He felt doemmentation.

mproper RIV CPG ENOT DISCLOSE W cte.rmansww O

/9/86 l

h O

5 5

G

~

f i

erson

' DO NOT DISCIDEE Jan. 9, 1986 4.

Re recomunended that the SRRR reject files would identify all unsatisfactory inspector / inspection issues and that these could then be tracked to review QE corrective actions.

5.

He stated he knew of no real hardware problems.

6.

He indicated be did not trust the Safe Team.

T. F. Westerman, Chief Comanche Pea. Region IV Group Encitsures CCs C. Eale w/o att i

i DO NOT DISCIDSE i

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20237L711&oldid=3920638"