05000250/FIN-2011008-05: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by Mark Hawes) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| identified by = NRC | | identified by = NRC | ||
| Inspection procedure = IP 71111.21 | | Inspection procedure = IP 71111.21 | ||
| Inspector = D Jones, G Skinner, D Mas | | Inspector = D Jones, G Skinner, D Mas-Penaranda, M Yeminy, R Patterson, B Desai, E Stamm, D Terri-Ward | ||
| CCA = N/A for ROP | | CCA = N/A for ROP | ||
| INPO aspect = | | INPO aspect = | ||
| description = The team identified a SL-IV NCV for the licensees failure to update the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for a modification affecting the Unit 3 emergency diesel generator fuel oil storage tank. Specifically, a common-mode failure method was not described in the UFSAR that required proceduralized manual actions during design bases rain events. The licensee entered these issues into their corrective action program as AR 1679078. The failure to update the UFSAR as required by procedure ENG Q1-3.4 and 10 CFR 50.71(e) was a performance deficiency. This performance deficiency was considered as traditional enforcement because, not having an adequately updated UFSAR hinders the licensees ability to perform adequate 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations and can impact the NRCs ability to perform its regulatory function such as, license amendment reviews and inspections. In addition, the team determined that the performance deficiency was material to safety because the modification resulted in a common-mode failure method that required proceduralized manual actions for the Unit 3 EDGs to meet their mission time during design bases rain events. This violation was determined to be a SL-IV violation using Section 6.1 of the NRCs Enforcement Policy because the erroneous information was not used to make an unacceptable change to the facility or procedures. Cross-cutting aspects are not assigned for traditional enforcement violations. | | description = The team identified a SL-IV NCV for the licensees failure to update the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) for a modification affecting the Unit 3 emergency diesel generator fuel oil storage tank. Specifically, a common-mode failure method was not described in the UFSAR that required proceduralized manual actions during design bases rain events. The licensee entered these issues into their corrective action program as AR 1679078. The failure to update the UFSAR as required by procedure ENG Q1-3.4 and 10 CFR 50.71(e) was a performance deficiency. This performance deficiency was considered as traditional enforcement because, not having an adequately updated UFSAR hinders the licensees ability to perform adequate 10 CFR 50.59 evaluations and can impact the NRCs ability to perform its regulatory function such as, license amendment reviews and inspections. In addition, the team determined that the performance deficiency was material to safety because the modification resulted in a common-mode failure method that required proceduralized manual actions for the Unit 3 EDGs to meet their mission time during design bases rain events. This violation was determined to be a SL-IV violation using Section 6.1 of the NRCs Enforcement Policy because the erroneous information was not used to make an unacceptable change to the facility or procedures. Cross-cutting aspects are not assigned for traditional enforcement violations. | ||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 20:44, 20 February 2018
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
|---|---|
| Report | IR 05000250/2011008 Section 1R21 |
| Date counted | Sep 30, 2011 (2011Q3) |
| Type: | TEV: Severity level IV |
| cornerstone | Mitigating Systems |
| Identified by: | NRC identified |
| Inspection Procedure: | IP 71111.21 |
| Inspectors (proximate) | D Jones G Skinner D Mas-Penaranda M Yeminy R Patterson B Desai E Stamm D Terri-Ward |
| INPO aspect | |
| ' | |