ML12333A045: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 22: Line 22:
We understand it will take NRC a couple of days to provide us that language. On the call, NRC suggested that the consultation period be extended by 7 days (to December 5, 2012) to allow NRC to provide us this language, for us to consider it and for us to take the final BiOp through our final clearance and signature process. We have no problem with the extension and understand that you have contacted Entergy as well (they are also cc'd here). We are interested in getting the Opinion done as quickly as possible but recognize that taking a few days to address the remaining comments and concerns is worthwhile.
We understand it will take NRC a couple of days to provide us that language. On the call, NRC suggested that the consultation period be extended by 7 days (to December 5, 2012) to allow NRC to provide us this language, for us to consider it and for us to take the final BiOp through our final clearance and signature process. We have no problem with the extension and understand that you have contacted Entergy as well (they are also cc'd here). We are interested in getting the Opinion done as quickly as possible but recognize that taking a few days to address the remaining comments and concerns is worthwhile.
Additionally, we asked you about Entergy's comment, "Entergy also notes that any implementation schedule may need to account for authorizations of other regulators, including NRC" (p. 7 of Entergy's 11/9/12 comment letter). NRC indicated that they did not know what authorization from NRC Entergy may be referring to and that we should ask Entergy for clarification. By including Entergy on this email we are seeking their clarification and hope that they will work with you to provide us an answer indicating what NRC authorizations they are referring to.
Additionally, we asked you about Entergy's comment, "Entergy also notes that any implementation schedule may need to account for authorizations of other regulators, including NRC" (p. 7 of Entergy's 11/9/12 comment letter). NRC indicated that they did not know what authorization from NRC Entergy may be referring to and that we should ask Entergy for clarification. By including Entergy on this email we are seeking their clarification and hope that they will work with you to provide us an answer indicating what NRC authorizations they are referring to.
Thank you, Julie Crocker NMFS PRD
Thank you, Julie Crocker NMFS PRD Julie Crocker Protected Resources Division Northeast Regional Office National Marine Fisheries Service 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 1
--
Julie Crocker Protected Resources Division Northeast Regional Office National Marine Fisheries Service 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 1


Hearing Identifier:    IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:          3939 Mail Envelope Properties      (CAO0U0kiGKx4nPu4mi3+AW3AQnvAh+kP0-k22Vimffi12ViQX-A)
Hearing Identifier:    IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number:          3939 Mail Envelope Properties      (CAO0U0kiGKx4nPu4mi3+AW3AQnvAh+kP0-k22Vimffi12ViQX-A)

Latest revision as of 10:19, 6 February 2020

Lr Hearing - Completion of Final Indian Point Opinion
ML12333A045
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From:
- No Known Affiliation
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
Download: ML12333A045 (2)
v • d • e


Text

IPRenewal NPEmails From: Julie Crocker - NOAA Federal [julie.crocker@noaa.gov]

Sent: Monday, November 26, 2012 3:43 PM To: Turk, Sherwin; Logan, Dennis; Balsam, Briana Cc: dgray@entergy.com; Julie Williams - NOAA Federal

Subject:

Completion of final Indian Point Opinion Hi Sherwin, As we discussed on the phone this afternoon, we are working on finalizing the Biological Opinion due to be issued to NRC re. Indian Point on 11/28. Today, we discussed NRC's comments on the draft Incidental Take Statement (ITS). NRC will be proposing some modified language to us regarding compliance with the ITS.

We understand it will take NRC a couple of days to provide us that language. On the call, NRC suggested that the consultation period be extended by 7 days (to December 5, 2012) to allow NRC to provide us this language, for us to consider it and for us to take the final BiOp through our final clearance and signature process. We have no problem with the extension and understand that you have contacted Entergy as well (they are also cc'd here). We are interested in getting the Opinion done as quickly as possible but recognize that taking a few days to address the remaining comments and concerns is worthwhile.

Additionally, we asked you about Entergy's comment, "Entergy also notes that any implementation schedule may need to account for authorizations of other regulators, including NRC" (p. 7 of Entergy's 11/9/12 comment letter). NRC indicated that they did not know what authorization from NRC Entergy may be referring to and that we should ask Entergy for clarification. By including Entergy on this email we are seeking their clarification and hope that they will work with you to provide us an answer indicating what NRC authorizations they are referring to.

Thank you, Julie Crocker NMFS PRD Julie Crocker Protected Resources Division Northeast Regional Office National Marine Fisheries Service 55 Great Republic Drive Gloucester, MA 01930 1

Hearing Identifier: IndianPointUnits2and3NonPublic_EX Email Number: 3939 Mail Envelope Properties (CAO0U0kiGKx4nPu4mi3+AW3AQnvAh+kP0-k22Vimffi12ViQX-A)

Subject:

Completion of final Indian Point Opinion Sent Date: 11/26/2012 3:43:20 PM Received Date: 11/26/2012 3:44:09 PM From: Julie Crocker - NOAA Federal Created By: julie.crocker@noaa.gov Recipients:

"dgray@entergy.com" <dgray@entergy.com>

Tracking Status: None "Julie Williams - NOAA Federal" <julie.williams@noaa.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Turk, Sherwin" <Sherwin.Turk@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Logan, Dennis" <Dennis.Logan@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Balsam, Briana" <Briana.Balsam@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None Post Office: mail.gmail.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1725 11/26/2012 3:44:09 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received:

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12333A045&oldid=2459776"