ML17278B136: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 27: Line 27:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOOID TITLE:  OR COPIES RECEIVED: LTR Submittal: Qeneral Distribution ENCL  BIIE:    f NOTES:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOOID TITLE:  OR COPIES RECEIVED: LTR Submittal: Qeneral Distribution ENCL  BIIE:    f NOTES:
REC IP IENT          COPIEB            REC IP I ENT      COP IES ID CODE/MANE          LTTR ENCL      ID CODE/MANE      LTTR ENCL BWR EB                    }          BWR  EICSB            2    2 BWR FQB                    1          BWR  PD3 LA                0 BWR PD3 PD      01        5    5      BRADFUTEi J                1
REC IP IENT          COPIEB            REC IP I ENT      COP IES ID CODE/MANE          LTTR ENCL      ID CODE/MANE      LTTR ENCL BWR EB                    }          BWR  EICSB            2    2 BWR FQB                    1          BWR  PD3 LA                0 BWR PD3 PD      01        5    5      BRADFUTEi J                1
           'WR  PSB                        1    BWR RSB                      1 INTERNAL: ACRB              09      6    6      ADN/LFNB              1    0 ELD/HDS2                  1    0              T/TSCB      1    1 NRR/GRAS                  1    0      REQ  FIL        04  1
           'WR  PSB                        1    BWR RSB                      1 INTERNAL: ACRB              09      6    6      ADN/LFNB              1    0 ELD/HDS2                  1    0              T/TSCB      1    1 NRR/GRAS                  1    0      REQ  FIL        04  1 RQN5                  ~
                                                                            '
RQN5                  ~
1    1 EXTERNAL: EG8rQ BRUBKEi S                        LPDR              03 NRC PDR          02                  NSIC              05 Ran.>d    V0iCRaaiC      4 i%0. '
1    1 EXTERNAL: EG8rQ BRUBKEi S                        LPDR              03 NRC PDR          02                  NSIC              05 Ran.>d    V0iCRaaiC      4 i%0. '
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED'TTR              29  ENCL      25
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED'TTR              29  ENCL      25
Line 40: Line 38:
I>> ~
I>> ~
                                         'l  IP            It rI JI                                            !    jh I"
                                         'l  IP            It rI JI                                            !    jh I"
                                                                                                                                                                          >>
tl j4                                                        1 I
tl j4                                                        1 I
                                                                                       >>      " 3 Jl  '    t                                              rC''l I
                                                                                       >>      " 3 Jl  '    t                                              rC''l I

Latest revision as of 08:23, 4 February 2020

Application for Amend to License NPF-21,authorizing Removal of Snubbers for Testing or Maint During Modes 4 & 5 W/O Declaring Attached Sys Inoperable.No Significant Hazards Exist Since Structural Integrity Met.Fee Paid
ML17278B136
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 12/12/1986
From: Sorensen G
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To: Adensam E
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17278B137 List:
References
GO2-86-1067, TAC-64217, NUDOCS 8612190195
Download: ML17278B136 (11)


Text

~ ~ 0 ~

REQULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (R IDB)

ACCEBBIQN NBR: 86}2}90}95 DQC, DATE: 86/12/12 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKET I FACIL: 50-397 WPPSB Nuclear Progecti Unit 2i Washington Public Pome 05000397 AUTH. MANE AUTHOR AFFILIATION SORENSENi Q. C. Washington Public Power Supply System REC IP. NANE RECIPIENT AFFILIATION ADENSANi E. Q. BWR Prospect Directorate 3

SUBJECT:

Application for amend to License NPF-2}I authorizing removal of snubbers for testing or maint during Nodes 4 0 5 w/o j j declaring attached sos inoperable. No significant hazards exist since structural integritg met. Fee paid.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: AOOID TITLE: OR COPIES RECEIVED: LTR Submittal: Qeneral Distribution ENCL BIIE: f NOTES:

REC IP IENT COPIEB REC IP I ENT COP IES ID CODE/MANE LTTR ENCL ID CODE/MANE LTTR ENCL BWR EB } BWR EICSB 2 2 BWR FQB 1 BWR PD3 LA 0 BWR PD3 PD 01 5 5 BRADFUTEi J 1

'WR PSB 1 BWR RSB 1 INTERNAL: ACRB 09 6 6 ADN/LFNB 1 0 ELD/HDS2 1 0 T/TSCB 1 1 NRR/GRAS 1 0 REQ FIL 04 1 RQN5 ~

1 1 EXTERNAL: EG8rQ BRUBKEi S LPDR 03 NRC PDR 02 NSIC 05 Ran.>d V0iCRaaiC 4 i%0. '

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED'TTR 29 ENCL 25

h

~ 0 ~ ~

r II Ia, ~ 1

"\

II l".

I>> ~

'l IP It rI JI  ! jh I"

tl j4 1 I

>> " 3 Jl ' t rCl I

'K ll d A

t.,'

II

,>> t I

~

r I >>1 ,>>

t' , lh I

I '.I QIQ fry,t,, fg l' ~

l /II" r , g l> rr>> E ">> f " 't " )I g'i<>>r lr>j I>>% ~ ( J t le I nllr

~ 'f )t

>>v tt$

J 3 J It I '>> l t>>

~ .<>> ~

t I' IJ

)

>>t4 'i..j t;(> t

'b J rrgl tl>>

Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 (509) 372-5000 December 12, 1986 G02-86-1067 Docket No. 50-397 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn:- E. G. Adensam, Project Director BWR Project Directorate No. 3 Division of BWR Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

Dear Ms. Adensam:

Subject:

NUCLEAR PLANT NO. 2 OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21, REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION 3/4. 7.4, SNUBBERS In accordance with the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 10, Parts 50.90 and 2.101, the Supply System hereby requests an amendment to the WNP-2 Technical Specifications. Specifically, the Supply System is seeking to gain the ability to remove snubbers for testing or maintenance during Modes 4 and 5 without having to declare the attached system inoperable as prescribed in the Action Statement based upon previous engineering analysis performed in accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 50. 59.

During Nodes 4 and 5, snubbers are required to be removed for functional testing and to eliminate interferences for performance of maintenance activities on adjacent equipment. Verbatum Technical Specification com-pliance would requi re removal to be considered an inoperable condition and entry into the Action Statement. This may also require a declaration of system inoperability each time a snubber is removed for a routine reason if the activity exceeds 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br />. This could represent an ex-cessive administrative burden if a pre-analyzed configuration were not allowed to be used to support the periodic functional testing require-ments in the snubber LCO. During Nodes 4 and 5, the loads experienced by the piping system are considerably less than those in Modes 1, 2 and 3. Thus, declaring system inoperable due to removal of snubbers which are shown to be redundant per engineering analysis is not necessary from an overall plant safety standpoint. To avoid this si tuation, an amendment to the Technical Specification is being requested.

8612190195 861212 PDR ADOCK 05000397 P PDR

'J ~gypc,I( QIW 'Oo

~ . )4

~r" g

E. G. Adensan.

Page Two REQUEST FOR AMEND. TO TS 3/4.7.4, SNUBBERS In support of this position, the Supply System has performed an engineering analysis in accordance with 10 CFR 50.59 which demonstrates that it is acceptable to operate with less than 100 percent of the snubbers installed in Modes 4 and 5. This analysis further demonstrates that the structural integrity of the Reactor Coolant System (RCS) and all other safety-related systems is maintained during and following a seismic or other event initiating dynamic loads since fewer snubbers are required to sustain the significantly reduced system loads encountered during plant shutdown conditions. Piping analyses have been completed to develop and support the general snubber removal criteria that are applied for maintenance and testing activities during plant Modes 4 and 5. These analyses applied all normal and accident condition load combinations occurring durin'g plant Modes 4 and 5. The analyses were completed in full compliance with all ASME Section III code 'requirements and, furthermore, considered the allowable loading on containment pene-trations, RPV nozzles, anchors and all remaining installed pipe supports.

Piping system dynamic deflections with removed snubbers have also been evaluated for acceptability. All piping anchor groups analyzed were located inside containment with a range of pipe sizes from 2 to 26 inches in diameter. The work is documented in Supply System calculation ME 86-16. With this amendment, removal of snubbers during Modes 4 and 5 within the guidelines established by engineering analysis would not require entering into the Action Statement. However, if the snubber removed for testing actually fails the functional test acceptance criteria, an additional engineering evaluation is necessary and shall be performed per Specification 4. 7.4g to determine the cause and subsequent testing re-quirements. In summary, this amendment will permi t verbatum compliance with the Survei llance Requirements of LCO 3.7.4 while ensuring system operability.

The other requested change to this Technical Specification deals with the visual inspection period table (page 3/4 7-11). For the case where zero snubbers are found by inspection to be inoperable, the required inspec-tion -period is 18 months + 25% (the provisions of 4.0.2 are not applica-ble); At WNP-2, this worF is currently required to be performed during refueling outages. Supply System's outages are currently directed by the Bonneville Power Administration to be on an annual basis coinciding with the spring runoff or peak hydro capacity period. The table does not make any provisions for zero failures being identified for plants requiring annual refueling outages.

~ ~ ~ ~

E. 6. Adensam Page Three REQUEST FOR AMEND. TO TS 3/4.7.4, SNUBBERS In order to correct that, we have modified the 18 month subsequent visual inspection period to account for this situation by increasing the lower tolerance to 505, while leaving the upper tolerance at 25K.

Without such a change, the Supply System could be put in the position of having to shutdown between refueling outages for the purpose of snubber surveillances, even when the last inspection revealed zero failures. We consider this to be an administrative change only.

The Supply System has reviewed this request per 10 CFR 50.59 and 50.92 and has determined that no unreviewed safety questions or significant hazards will-result relative to the proposed change because it does not:

1) Involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated because the temporary removal of snubbers duri ng Modes 4 and 5 has been evaluated by engineering analysis to meet all structural integri ty requirements of the original design.
2) Create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated because this change involves no changes to system design bases nor does it introduce any new variables than those that were previously considered. Engineering evaluation demonstrates compliance to ASME Section III requirements while the snubber is removed. The evaluation also stipulates the criteria that must be used in evaluating the number and sequence of snubbers that can be safely removed for testing and maintenance from a given piping anchor group. Hence, no new failure mode is created.
3) Involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety because even though a snubber may be temporarily removed for testing and or maintenance, the engineering analysis has demonstrated that .there is sufficient design conservatism'to permit this temporary situation without any reduction in system integrity. The bases, of the technical specification is to rely on an engineering evaluation for system operability.

The Supply System will need this technical specification amendment to be in place during our next scheduled refueling outage, presently scheduled to begin no earlier than March 15, 1987. For this reason, we have submitted it well in advance of the outage in order to allow the Staff and the Supply System sufficient time for processing.

E. G. Adensam Page Four REQUEST FOR AMEND. TO TS 3/4.7.4, SNUBBERS This change has been reviewed and approved by the WNP-2 Plant Operations Committee and the Supply System Corporate Nuclear Safety Review Board.

In accordance with 10 CFR 170.21, an application fee of One hundred fifty.

dollars ($ 150.00) accompanies this request. In accordance with 10 CFR 50.91, the State of Washington has been provided a copy of this letter.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. P. L.

Powell, Manager, WNP-2 Licensing.

Very truly yours, G. C. orensen, Manager Regulatory Programs HLA/RR/t@h Attachment cc: JO Bradfute - NRC C Eschels - EFSEC JB Martin - NRC RV E Revell - BPA NS Reynolds - BLCP&R NRC Site Inspector

~ ~ 6 ~

STATE OF WASHINGTON County of Benton

)

)

)

Subject:

o ..~~7 W<.~. ~

I, G. C. Sorensen, being duly sworn, subscribe to and say that I am the Manager, Regulatory Programs for the WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, the applicant herein; that I have full authority to execute this oath; that I have reviewed the foregoing; and that to the best of my knowledge, information and belief the statements made in it are true.

o nsen, Manager Regulatory Programs On this day personally appeared before me G. C. Sorensen to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledge that he signed the same as his free act and deed for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.

GIVEN under my hand and seal this ~L" day of , 1986.

(

otary u ic n an for the 1

State of Washington I

Residing at op52

<l ql>

E C

h

<e, r