ML060820248: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Seabrook Seabrook Annual Assessment MeetingAnnual Assessment MeetingReactor Oversight Program Reactor Oversight Program  
{{#Wiki_filter:Seabrook Annual Assessment Meeting Reactor Oversight Program - CY 2005 Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I King of Prussia, Pennsylvania March 30, 2006
--CY 2005CY 2005Nuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
 
--Region IRegion IKing of Prussia, PennsylvaniaKing of Prussia, PennsylvaniaMarch 30, 2006March 30, 2006 Purpose of Today's MeetingPurpose of Today's MeetingA public forum for discussion of the licensee's A public forum for discussion of the licensee's performanceperformanceNRC will address the licensee performance issues NRC will address the licensee performance issues identified in the annual assessment letteridentified in the annual assessment letterLicensee will be given the opportunity to respond to Licensee will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve new or existing programs to maintain or improve their performance their performance AgendaAgendaIntroduction  Introduction Review of Reactor Oversight ProcessReview of Reactor Oversight ProcessNational Summary of Plant PerformanceNational Summary of Plant PerformanceDiscussion of Plant Performance ResultsDiscussion of Plant Performance ResultsLicensee Response and RemarksLicensee Response and RemarksNRC Closing RemarksNRC Closing RemarksBreakBreakNRC available to address public questionsNRC available to address public questions Region I OrganizationRegion I OrganizationSamuel J. CollinsRegional AdministratorMarc L. DapasDeputy Regional AdministratorBrian E. HolianDirector Division of Reactor ProjectsDavid C. LewDeputy DirectorA. Randolph BloughDirector Division of Reactor SafetyMarsha K. GamberoniDeputy DirectorPaul G. KrohnBranch ChiefRegional SpecialistsSeabrookResident InspectorsGlenn DentelSteve ShafferSenior Project EngineersScott BarberBarry Norris NRC RepresentativesNRC RepresentativesGlenn Dentel, Senior Resident InspectorGlenn Dentel, Senior Resident InspectorSteve Shaffer, Resident InspectorSteve Shaffer, Resident Inspector
Purpose of Todays Meeting A public forum for discussion of the licensees performance NRC will address the licensee performance issues identified in the annual assessment letter Licensee will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve their performance
--(603) 474 (603) 474--3589/35803589/3580Ed Miller, Project Manager, NRREd Miller, Project Manager, NRR
 
--(301) 415 (301) 415--24812481Paul Krohn, Branch ChiefPaul Krohn, Branch Chief
Agenda z Introduction z Review of Reactor Oversight Process z National Summary of Plant Performance z Discussion of Plant Performance Results z Licensee Response and Remarks z NRC Closing Remarks z Break z NRC available to address public questions
--(610) 337 (610) 337--51205120Scott Barber, Senior Project EngineerScott Barber, Senior Project Engineer
 
--(610) 337 (610) 337--52325232Barry Norris, Senior Project EngineerBarry Norris, Senior Project Engineer
Region I Organization Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator Marc L. Dapas Deputy Regional Administrator Brian E. Holian                                      A. Randolph Blough Director Division of Reactor Projects                  Director Division of Reactor Safety David C. Lew                                        Marsha K. Gamberoni Deputy Director                                        Deputy Director Paul G. Krohn Regional Specialists Branch Chief Seabrook                                Senior Project Engineers Resident Inspectors                                Scott Barber Glenn Dentel                                    Barry Norris Steve Shaffer
--(610) 337 (610) 337--51115111 NRC Performance Goals NRC Performance GoalsSafety:  Ensure protection of the public health and Safety: Ensure protection of the public health and safety and the environmentsafety and the environmentSecurity:  Ensure the secure use and management of Security: Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materialsradioactive materialsOpenness: Ensure openness in our regulatory processOpenness:  Ensure openness in our regulatory processEffectiveness:  Ensure that NRC actions are effective, Effectiveness: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timelyefficient, realistic, and timelyManagement:  Ensure excellence in agency Management: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRC strategic objectivemanagement to carry out the NRC strategic objective Reactor Oversight ProcessReactor Oversight ProcessSafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance AreasSafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance Areas Examples of Baseline InspectionsExamples of Baseline InspectionsEquipment Alignment    Equipment Alignment   ~80 hrs/yr ~80 hrs/yr Triennial Fire Protection  Triennial Fire Protection   ~200 hrs every 3 yrs~200 hrs every 3 yrsOperator Response    Operator Response     ~125 hrs/yr~125 hrs/yrEmergency Preparedness  Emergency Preparedness ~80 hrs/yr~80 hrs/yrRad Release Controls    Rad Release Controls     ~110 hrs every 2 yrs~110 hrs every 2 yrsWorker Radiation Protection  Worker Radiation Protection ~90 hrs/yr~90 hrs/yrCorrective Action Program Corrective Action Program ~250 hrs every 2 yrs~250 hrs every 2 yrsCorrective Action Case Reviews Corrective Action Case Reviews ~60 hrs/yr~60 hrs/yr Significance ThresholdSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorsPerformance IndicatorsGreenGreen::Baseline InspectionBaseline Inspection White White::May increase NRC oversightMay increase NRC oversightYellowYellow::Requires more NRC oversightRequires more NRC oversight Red Red::Requires more NRC oversightRequires more NRC oversightInspection FindingsInspection FindingsGreenGreen::Very low safety issueVery low safety issue White White::Low to moderate safety issueLow to moderate safety issueYellowYellow::Substantial safety issueSubstantial safety issue Red Red::High safety issueHigh safety issue Action Matrix ConceptAction Matrix ConceptLicenseeResponseRegulatoryResponseDegradedCornerstoneMultiple/Rep.DegradedCornerstoneUnacceptablePerformanceIncreasing Safety SignificanceIncreasing Safety SignificanceIncreasing NRC Inspection EffortsIncreasing NRC Inspection EffortsIncreasing NRC/Licensee Management InvolvementIncreasing NRC/Licensee Management InvolvementIncreasing Regulatory ActionsIncreasing Regulatory Actions National Summary of Plant PerformanceNational Summary of Plant PerformanceStatus at End of CY 2005Status at End of CY 2005Licensee Response  Licensee Response 84 84Regulatory Response  Regulatory Response 12 12Degraded Cornerstone  Degraded Cornerstone 4 4Multiple/Repetitive Degraded CornerstoneMultiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 3 3Unacceptable  Unacceptable 0 0TotalTotal 103 103 National Summary National SummaryPerformance Indicator Results (at end of CY 2005)Performance Indicator Results (at end of CY 2005)GreenGreen18501850 White White 4 4YellowYellow 0 0 Red Red 0 0Total Inspection Findings (CY 2005)Total Inspection Findings (CY 2005)GreenGreen849849 White White 10 10YellowYellow 1 1 Red Red 0 0 Seabrook Assessment Results Seabrook Assessment Results (Jan 1 (Jan 1 --Dec 31, 2005)Dec 31, 2005)Licensee Response ColumnLicensee Response ColumnNo safety significant findings or PIsNo safety significant findings or PIs Seabrook Inspection ActivitiesSeabrook Inspection Activities(Jan 1 (Jan 1 --Dec 31, 2005)
 
Dec 31, 2005)6800 Hours of inspection related activities6800 Hours of inspection related activitiesTwo resident inspectors assigned to the siteTwo resident inspectors assigned to the siteSpecialist InspectionsSpecialist Inspections
NRC Representatives z Glenn Dentel, Senior Resident Inspector Steve Shaffer, Resident Inspector
--9 regional inspections9 regional inspections
  - (603) 474-3589/3580 z Ed Miller, Project Manager, NRR
--2 team inspections 2 team inspections Seabrook Inspection ActivitiesSeabrook Inspection Activities(Jan 1 -Dec 31, 2005)Inspection findingsInspection findings
  - (301) 415-2481 z Paul Krohn, Branch Chief
--8 findings of very low safety significance (Green)8 findings of very low safety significance (Green)Refueling outage (April 2 Refueling outage (April 2
  - (610) 337-5120 z Scott Barber, Senior Project Engineer
--April 30, 2005)April 30, 2005)
  - (610) 337-5232 z Barry Norris, Senior Project Engineer
--no findings related to the outageno findings related to the outageSafety System Design team inspectionSafety System Design team inspection
  - (610) 337-5111
--1 finding of very low safety significance (Green)1 finding of very low safety significance (Green)Triennial Fire Protection team inspectionTriennial Fire Protection team inspection
 
--1 finding of very low safety significance (Green)1 finding of very low safety significance (Green)
NRC Performance Goals z Safety: Ensure protection of the public health and safety and the environment z Security: Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materials z Openness: Ensure openness in our regulatory process z Effectiveness: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timely z Management: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRC strategic objective
Seabrook SeabrookAnnual Assessment SummaryAnnual Assessment SummaryJanuary 1 January 1  
 
--December 31, 2005December 31, 2005FPL operated Seabrook Station in a manner that FPL operated Seabrook Station in a manner that preserved public health and safetypreserved public health and safetyAll cornerstone objectives were metAll cornerstone objectives were metNRC plans baseline inspections at Seabrook for the NRC plans baseline inspections at Seabrook for the remainder of the assessment periodremainder of the assessment period Licensee Response and RemarksLicensee Response and RemarksGene St. PierreGene St. PierreSite Vice PresidentSite Vice PresidentFPL Energy Seabrook, LLCFPL Energy Seabrook, LLC Contacting the NRCContacting the NRCReport an emergencyReport an emergency(301) 816(301) 816--5100 (call collect)5100 (call collect)Report a safety concern:   Report a safety concern:    (800) 695(800) 695--7403 7403  Allegation@nrc.govAllegation@nrc.govGeneral information or questionsGeneral information or questionswww.nrc.govwww.nrc.govSelect "What We Do" for Public AffairsSelect "What We Do" for Public Affairs Paul Paul KrohnKrohn, Branch Chief, Branch Chiefpgk1@nrc.govpgk1@nrc.gov Reference SourcesReference SourcesReactor Oversight ProcessReactor Oversight Processhttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.htmlhttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.htmlPublic Electronic Reading RoomPublic Electronic Reading Roomhttp://www.nrc.gov/readinghttp://www.nrc.gov/reading
Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection                   Performance Indicator Results                                Results Significance                    Significance Threshold                        Threshold Action Matrix Regulatory Response
--rm.htmlrm.htmlPublic Document RoomPublic Document Room 1 1--800 800--397 397--4209 (Toll Free)4209 (Toll Free)
 
END OF THE PRESENTATIONEND  OF  THE  PRESENTATIONNuclear Regulatory Commission Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
Examples of Baseline Inspections z Equipment Alignment           ~80 hrs/yr z Triennial Fire Protection     ~200 hrs every 3 yrs z Operator Response             ~125 hrs/yr z Emergency Preparedness         ~80 hrs/yr z Rad Release Controls           ~110 hrs every 2 yrs z Worker Radiation Protection   ~90 hrs/yr z Corrective Action Program     ~250 hrs every 2 yrs z Corrective Action Case Reviews ~60 hrs/yr
--Region IRegion IKing of Prussia, PennsylvaniaKing of Prussia, PennsylvaniaMarch 30, 2006March 30, 2006 Potential Public Interest IssuesPotential Public Interest IssuesSafety Concerns Brought to the NRCSafety Concerns Brought to the NRCNRC has a formal processNRC has a formal processConcerns are reviewed on an individual basis by NRC technical, Concerns are reviewed on an individual basis by NRC technical, legal, investigative staff and managementlegal, investigative staff and managementIssues of immediate concern receive prompt attention by NRC and Issues of immediate concern receive prompt attention by NRC and by nuclear power plant managementby nuclear power plant managementNRC'sNRC'sprocess requires reviews of all valid safety issues to ensure process requires reviews of all valid safety issues to ensure they are adequately addressedthey are adequately addressedNRC implements measures to protect the identity of allegers NRC implements measures to protect the identity of allegers including not commenting on the existence of a specific allegatiincluding not commenting on the existence of a specific allegati on on Potential Public Interest IssuesPotential Public Interest IssuesRecent Press Articles on Security IssuesRecent Press Articles on Security IssuesCurrent NRC policy is to not discuss security matters in a Current NRC policy is to not discuss security matters in a public forumpublic forumNRC will not comment on existence of allegations in this NRC will not comment on existence of allegations in this area areaNotwithstanding these policies, we want to assure the Notwithstanding these policies, we want to assure the public that if safety issues did exist, the NRC would take public that if safety issues did exist, the NRC would take prompt action to address themprompt action to address them}}
 
Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green: Baseline Inspection White: May increase NRC oversight Yellow: Requires more NRC oversight Red:     Requires more NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green: Very low safety issue White: Low to moderate safety issue Yellow: Substantial safety issue Red:     High safety issue
 
Action Matrix Concept Licensee  Regulatory Degraded    Multiple/Rep. Unacceptable Response  Response  Cornerstone Degraded      Performance Cornerstone Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions
 
National Summary of Plant Performance Status at End of CY 2005 Licensee Response                             84 Regulatory Response                           12 Degraded Cornerstone                           4 Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone       3 Unacceptable                                   0 Total                                      103
 
National Summary z Performance Indicator Results (at end of CY 2005)
Green        1850 White       4 Yellow      0 Red         0 z Total Inspection Findings (CY 2005)
Green        849 White       10 Yellow      1 Red         0
 
Seabrook Assessment Results (Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2005) z Licensee Response Column z No safety significant findings or PIs
 
Seabrook Inspection Activities (Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2005) 6800 Hours of inspection related activities Two resident inspectors assigned to the site Specialist Inspections
  - 9 regional inspections
  - 2 team inspections
 
Seabrook Inspection Activities (Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2005)
Inspection findings
  - 8 findings of very low safety significance (Green)
Refueling outage (April 2 - April 30, 2005)
  - no findings related to the outage Safety System Design team inspection
  - 1 finding of very low safety significance (Green)
Triennial Fire Protection team inspection
  - 1 finding of very low safety significance (Green)
 
Seabrook Annual Assessment Summary January 1 - December 31, 2005 z FPL operated Seabrook Station in a manner that preserved public health and safety z All cornerstone objectives were met z NRC plans baseline inspections at Seabrook for the remainder of the assessment period
 
Licensee Response and Remarks Gene St. Pierre Site Vice President FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC
 
Contacting the NRC z Report an emergency (301) 816-5100 (call collect) z Report a safety concern:
(800) 695-7403 Allegation@nrc.gov z General information or questions www.nrc.gov Select What We Do for Public Affairs z Paul Krohn, Branch Chief pgk1@nrc.gov
 
Reference Sources z Reactor Oversight Process http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html z Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html z Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)
 
END OF THE PRESENTATION Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I King of Prussia, Pennsylvania March 30, 2006
 
Potential Public Interest Issues Safety Concerns Brought to the NRC z NRC has a formal process z Concerns are reviewed on an individual basis by NRC technical, legal, investigative staff and management z Issues of immediate concern receive prompt attention by NRC and by nuclear power plant management z NRCs process requires reviews of all valid safety issues to ensure they are adequately addressed z NRC implements measures to protect the identity of allegers including not commenting on the existence of a specific allegation
 
Potential Public Interest Issues Recent Press Articles on Security Issues z Current NRC policy is to not discuss security matters in a public forum z NRC will not comment on existence of allegations in this area z Notwithstanding these policies, we want to assure the public that if safety issues did exist, the NRC would take prompt action to address them}}

Revision as of 20:49, 23 November 2019

03/30/2006 NRC Slides for Public Meeting with FPL Seabrook to Discuss Cy 2005 Performance
ML060820248
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/23/2006
From: Paul Krohn
NRC/RGN-I/DRP/PB6
To:
Krohn P, RI/DRP/PB6/610-337-5120
Shared Package
ML060660563 List:
References
MN 06-009
Download: ML060820248 (22)
v • d • e


Text

Seabrook Annual Assessment Meeting Reactor Oversight Program - CY 2005 Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I King of Prussia, Pennsylvania March 30, 2006

Purpose of Todays Meeting A public forum for discussion of the licensees performance NRC will address the licensee performance issues identified in the annual assessment letter Licensee will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve their performance

Agenda z Introduction z Review of Reactor Oversight Process z National Summary of Plant Performance z Discussion of Plant Performance Results z Licensee Response and Remarks z NRC Closing Remarks z Break z NRC available to address public questions

Region I Organization Samuel J. Collins Regional Administrator Marc L. Dapas Deputy Regional Administrator Brian E. Holian A. Randolph Blough Director Division of Reactor Projects Director Division of Reactor Safety David C. Lew Marsha K. Gamberoni Deputy Director Deputy Director Paul G. Krohn Regional Specialists Branch Chief Seabrook Senior Project Engineers Resident Inspectors Scott Barber Glenn Dentel Barry Norris Steve Shaffer

NRC Representatives z Glenn Dentel, Senior Resident Inspector Steve Shaffer, Resident Inspector

- (603) 474-3589/3580 z Ed Miller, Project Manager, NRR

- (301) 415-2481 z Paul Krohn, Branch Chief

- (610) 337-5120 z Scott Barber, Senior Project Engineer

- (610) 337-5232 z Barry Norris, Senior Project Engineer

- (610) 337-5111

NRC Performance Goals z Safety: Ensure protection of the public health and safety and the environment z Security: Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materials z Openness: Ensure openness in our regulatory process z Effectiveness: Ensure that NRC actions are effective, efficient, realistic, and timely z Management: Ensure excellence in agency management to carry out the NRC strategic objective

Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Performance Indicator Results Results Significance Significance Threshold Threshold Action Matrix Regulatory Response

Examples of Baseline Inspections z Equipment Alignment ~80 hrs/yr z Triennial Fire Protection ~200 hrs every 3 yrs z Operator Response ~125 hrs/yr z Emergency Preparedness ~80 hrs/yr z Rad Release Controls ~110 hrs every 2 yrs z Worker Radiation Protection ~90 hrs/yr z Corrective Action Program ~250 hrs every 2 yrs z Corrective Action Case Reviews ~60 hrs/yr

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green: Baseline Inspection White: May increase NRC oversight Yellow: Requires more NRC oversight Red: Requires more NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green: Very low safety issue White: Low to moderate safety issue Yellow: Substantial safety issue Red: High safety issue

Action Matrix Concept Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Rep. Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions

National Summary of Plant Performance Status at End of CY 2005 Licensee Response 84 Regulatory Response 12 Degraded Cornerstone 4 Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 3 Unacceptable 0 Total 103

National Summary z Performance Indicator Results (at end of CY 2005)

Green 1850 White 4 Yellow 0 Red 0 z Total Inspection Findings (CY 2005)

Green 849 White 10 Yellow 1 Red 0

Seabrook Assessment Results (Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2005) z Licensee Response Column z No safety significant findings or PIs

Seabrook Inspection Activities (Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2005) 6800 Hours of inspection related activities Two resident inspectors assigned to the site Specialist Inspections

- 9 regional inspections

- 2 team inspections

Seabrook Inspection Activities (Jan 1 - Dec 31, 2005)

Inspection findings

- 8 findings of very low safety significance (Green)

Refueling outage (April 2 - April 30, 2005)

- no findings related to the outage Safety System Design team inspection

- 1 finding of very low safety significance (Green)

Triennial Fire Protection team inspection

- 1 finding of very low safety significance (Green)

Seabrook Annual Assessment Summary January 1 - December 31, 2005 z FPL operated Seabrook Station in a manner that preserved public health and safety z All cornerstone objectives were met z NRC plans baseline inspections at Seabrook for the remainder of the assessment period

Licensee Response and Remarks Gene St. Pierre Site Vice President FPL Energy Seabrook, LLC

Contacting the NRC z Report an emergency (301) 816-5100 (call collect) z Report a safety concern:

(800) 695-7403 Allegation@nrc.gov z General information or questions www.nrc.gov Select What We Do for Public Affairs z Paul Krohn, Branch Chief pgk1@nrc.gov

Reference Sources z Reactor Oversight Process http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html z Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html z Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)

END OF THE PRESENTATION Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I King of Prussia, Pennsylvania March 30, 2006

Potential Public Interest Issues Safety Concerns Brought to the NRC z NRC has a formal process z Concerns are reviewed on an individual basis by NRC technical, legal, investigative staff and management z Issues of immediate concern receive prompt attention by NRC and by nuclear power plant management z NRCs process requires reviews of all valid safety issues to ensure they are adequately addressed z NRC implements measures to protect the identity of allegers including not commenting on the existence of a specific allegation

Potential Public Interest Issues Recent Press Articles on Security Issues z Current NRC policy is to not discuss security matters in a public forum z NRC will not comment on existence of allegations in this area z Notwithstanding these policies, we want to assure the public that if safety issues did exist, the NRC would take prompt action to address them

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML060820248&oldid=2194391"