ML061710465: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:June 23, 2006Mr. James M. Levine Executive Vice President, Generation Mail Station 7602 Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034
{{#Wiki_filter:June 23, 2006 Mr. James M. Levine Executive Vice President, Generation Mail Station 7602 Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL (TAC NOS. MC9425, MC9426, AND MC9427)
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL (TAC NOS. MC9425, MC9426, AND MC9427)


==Dear Mr. Levine:==
==Dear Mr. Levine:==


By letter dated December 23, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a licenseamendment request for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. Therequest is to extend the allowed out-of-service time for one inoperable emergency diesel generator from 72 hours to 10 days, add a clarifying note to Condition F of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, "AC [alternating current] Sources - Operating," and revise TS 3.4.9,"Pressurizer," to delete the words which require that the two groups of pressurizer heaters be capable of being powered from an emergency power supply.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provi ded anddetermined that additional information is required in order to complete the evaluation. The additional information being requested is enclosed. As discussed with Glenn Michael of your staff, the NRC staff is requesting a response within 30 days of the date of this letter.If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3062.Sincerely,
By letter dated December 23, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a license amendment request for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The request is to extend the allowed out-of-service time for one inoperable emergency diesel generator from 72 hours to 10 days, add a clarifying note to Condition F of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, "AC [alternating current] Sources - Operating," and revise TS 3.4.9, "Pressurizer," to delete the words which require that the two groups of pressurizer heaters be capable of being powered from an emergency power supply.
/RA/Mel B. Fields, Senior Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos: STN 50-528, STN 50-529 and STN 50-530
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided and determined that additional information is required in order to complete the evaluation. The additional information being requested is enclosed. As discussed with Glenn Michael of your staff, the NRC staff is requesting a response within 30 days of the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3062.
Sincerely,
                                            /RA/
Mel B. Fields, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos: STN 50-528, STN 50-529 and STN 50-530


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page June 23, 2006Mr. James M. Levine Executive Vice President, Generation Mail Station 7602 Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page
 
June 23, 2006 Mr. James M. Levine Executive Vice President, Generation Mail Station 7602 Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL (TAC NOS. MC9425, MC9426, AND MC9427)
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL (TAC NOS. MC9425, MC9426, AND MC9427)


==Dear Mr. Levine:==
==Dear Mr. Levine:==


By letter dated December 23, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a licenseamendment request for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. Therequest is to extend the allowed out-of-service time for one inoperable emergency diesel generator from 72 hours to 10 days, add a clarifying note to Condition F of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, "AC [alternating current] Sources - Operating," and revise TS 3.4.9,"Pressurizer," to delete the words which require that the two groups of pressurizer heaters be capable of being powered from an emergency power supply.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provi ded anddetermined that additional information is required in order to complete the evaluation. The additional information being requested is enclosed. As discussed with Glenn Michael of your staff, the NRC staff is requesting a response within 30 days of the date of this letter.If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3062.Sincerely,
By letter dated December 23, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a license amendment request for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The request is to extend the allowed out-of-service time for one inoperable emergency diesel generator from 72 hours to 10 days, add a clarifying note to Condition F of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, "AC [alternating current] Sources - Operating," and revise TS 3.4.9, "Pressurizer," to delete the words which require that the two groups of pressurizer heaters be capable of being powered from an emergency power supply.
/RA/Mel B. Fields, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos: STN 50-528, STN 50-529 and STN 50-530
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided and determined that additional information is required in order to complete the evaluation. The additional information being requested is enclosed. As discussed with Glenn Michael of your staff, the NRC staff is requesting a response within 30 days of the date of this letter.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3062.
Sincerely,
                                            /RA/
Mel B. Fields, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos: STN 50-528, STN 50-529 and STN 50-530


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next pageDISTRIBUTION
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION:
:PUBLICLPLIV ReadingRidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrDorlLpl4RidsRgn4MailCenter (TPruett)RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenterRidsNrrLALFeizollahi RidsNrrPMMFieldsRidsOgcRpADAMS ACCESSION NO: ML061710465OFFICELPL4/PMLPL4/LALPL4/BCNAMEMFieldsLFeizollahiDTerao DATE06/22/0606/22/0606/23/06OFFICIAL RECORD COPY REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, ET AL.PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3DOCKET NOS. STN 50-528, STN 50-529, AND STN 50-530By letter dated December 23, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a licenseamendment request for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS), Units 1, 2, and 3. The request is to extend the allowed out-of-service time (AOT) for one inoperable emergency diesel generator (EDG) from 72 hours to 10 days, add a clarifying note to Condition F of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, "AC [alternating current] Sources - Operating," and reviseTS 3.4.9, "Pressurizer," to delete the words which require that the two groups of pressurizerheaters be capable of being powered from an emergency power supply.The staff has reviewed the information provided and determined that the following additionalinformation is required in order to complete the evaluation. 1.Provide a qualitative or quantitative assessment of the following risk changes:-Information on risk-important components and configuration that will be affectedby the proposed extension, including Diesel Fuel Oil and Pressurizer Heaters.-Please provide a brief discussion and related information regarding the riskquantification tool.-Provide a discussion of the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) quality, withemphasis on the system(s) and train(s) affected by the amendment. Thediscussion may include parametric uncertainty.-Please provide relative risk impact on incremental conditional core damageprobability (ICCDP) and incremental conditional large early release probability(ICLERP), using zero maintenance model versus regular model with baseline test/maintenance activities.-Are there any compensatory measures to mitigate the potential risk increasesdue to the amendment?  If so, provide a discussion of the proposed compensatory measures and the associated benefit in both quantifiable and non-quantifiable terms.-Provide a brief discussion of the plant configuration control program and the on-line risk monitor.2.Your risk assessment in the submittal was based on internal events only. Discuss theimpact of potential external events and risk contributors, such as fire. 3.On page 17 of Enclosure 2 you state that your ICCDP would exceed the RegulatoryGuide (RG) guideline. The intent in making the comparison of the PRA results with RG 1.177 is to demonstrate, with reasonable assurance, that Principle 4 in the "Discussion" section of RG 1.177 is being met. Please discuss how Principle 4 is being met.4.In Table 3, Enclosure 2 of your request letter, you have recalculated internal event coredamage frequency based on your new reliability number. However, Table 2 of theenclosure clearly indicated that the plant risk (ICCDP) under the proposed amendmentwould increase by 6.44E-7 and 6.05E-7 for EDG A and EDG B, respectively. With this proposed TS change, it appears that the risk would increase by 6.44E-7/yr and 6.05E-7/yr, respectively, by annualizing the ICCDP for one year. Please explain these results.5.In your reliability recalculation presented in the second paragraph of page 17 ofEnclosure 2, the increase of the actual unavailability was assumed as 5.5 days insteadof the 10-day proposed extension. The 5.5 days of maintenance outage discussedimplies that the TS AOT will be used as a part of your routine online maintenanceactivities. Please explain.6.Please discuss the impacts of the uncertainties and risk contributors for both thoseexplicitly accounted for in the results and those that were not.7.According to your risk assessment, EDG A has higher risk importance than that ofEDG B. Please Explain.8.What are the risk assessment methodologies (such as FIVE) that you have employedfor fire?  Have you considered providing fire watch during the proposed AOT period?9.As a part of maintenance activities associated with EDGs, is this extension a part of theroutine maintenance activities?  Please elaborate.10.In diesel generator reliability, have you evaluated the Maintenance Preventable FunctionFailure (MPFF) under the 50.65 maintenance rule?  If so, have you incorporated the MPFF in your EDG reliability?  11.How does this extension impact the station blackout (SBO) sequences?  Please discussyour reliability program in general and specifically the ability and timing of the EDGs torecover from an SBO event.
PUBLIC                        LPLIV Reading                        RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrDorlLpl4              RidsRgn4MailCenter (TPruett)
Palo Verde Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 cc:March 2006Mr. Steve OleaArizona Corporation Commission 1200 W. Washington Street Phoenix, AZ  85007Mr. Douglas Kent PorterSenior Counsel Southern California Edison Company Law Department, Generation Resources
RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter        RidsNrrLALFeizollahi RidsNrrPMMFields              RidsOgcRp ADAMS ACCESSION NO: ML061710465 OFFICE      LPL4/PM        LPL4/LA          LPL4/BC NAME        MFields        LFeizollahi      DTerao DATE        06/22/06        06/22/06        06/23/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY


P.O. Box 800 Rosemead, CA  91770Senior Resident InspectorU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, ET AL.
PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 DOCKET NOS. STN 50-528, STN 50-529, AND STN 50-530 By letter dated December 23, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a license amendment request for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS), Units 1, 2, and 3.
The request is to extend the allowed out-of-service time (AOT) for one inoperable emergency diesel generator (EDG) from 72 hours to 10 days, add a clarifying note to Condition F of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, "AC [alternating current] Sources - Operating," and revise TS 3.4.9, "Pressurizer," to delete the words which require that the two groups of pressurizer heaters be capable of being powered from an emergency power supply.
The staff has reviewed the information provided and determined that the following additional information is required in order to complete the evaluation.
: 1.      Provide a qualitative or quantitative assessment of the following risk changes:
        -      Information on risk-important components and configuration that will be affected by the proposed extension, including Diesel Fuel Oil and Pressurizer Heaters.
        -      Please provide a brief discussion and related information regarding the risk quantification tool.
        -      Provide a discussion of the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) quality, with emphasis on the system(s) and train(s) affected by the amendment. The discussion may include parametric uncertainty.
        -      Please provide relative risk impact on incremental conditional core damage probability (ICCDP) and incremental conditional large early release probability (ICLERP), using zero maintenance model versus regular model with baseline test/maintenance activities.
        -      Are there any compensatory measures to mitigate the potential risk increases due to the amendment? If so, provide a discussion of the proposed compensatory measures and the associated benefit in both quantifiable and non-quantifiable terms.
        -      Provide a brief discussion of the plant configuration control program and the on-line risk monitor.
: 2.      Your risk assessment in the submittal was based on internal events only. Discuss the impact of potential external events and risk contributors, such as fire.
: 3. On page 17 of Enclosure 2 you state that your ICCDP would exceed the Regulatory Guide (RG) guideline. The intent in making the comparison of the PRA results with RG 1.177 is to demonstrate, with reasonable assurance, that Principle 4 in the Discussion section of RG 1.177 is being met. Please discuss how Principle 4 is being met.
: 4. In Table 3, Enclosure 2 of your request letter, you have recalculated internal event core damage frequency based on your new reliability number. However, Table 2 of the enclosure clearly indicated that the plant risk (ICCDP) under the proposed amendment would increase by 6.44E-7 and 6.05E-7 for EDG A and EDG B, respectively. With this proposed TS change, it appears that the risk would increase by 6.44E-7/yr and 6.05E-7/yr, respectively, by annualizing the ICCDP for one year. Please explain these results.
: 5. In your reliability recalculation presented in the second paragraph of page 17 of Enclosure 2, the increase of the actual unavailability was assumed as 5.5 days instead of the 10-day proposed extension. The 5.5 days of maintenance outage discussed implies that the TS AOT will be used as a part of your routine online maintenance activities. Please explain.
: 6. Please discuss the impacts of the uncertainties and risk contributors for both those explicitly accounted for in the results and those that were not.
: 7. According to your risk assessment, EDG A has higher risk importance than that of EDG B. Please Explain.
: 8. What are the risk assessment methodologies (such as FIVE) that you have employed for fire? Have you considered providing fire watch during the proposed AOT period?
: 9. As a part of maintenance activities associated with EDGs, is this extension a part of the routine maintenance activities? Please elaborate.
: 10. In diesel generator reliability, have you evaluated the Maintenance Preventable Function Failure (MPFF) under the 50.65 maintenance rule? If so, have you incorporated the MPFF in your EDG reliability?
: 11. How does this extension impact the station blackout (SBO) sequences? Please discuss your reliability program in general and specifically the ability and timing of the EDGs to recover from an SBO event.


P. O. Box 40 Buckeye, AZ  85326Regional Administrator, Region IVU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Harris Tower & Pavillion 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX  76011-8064ChairmanMaricopa County Board of Supervisors 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor Phoenix, AZ  85003Mr. Aubrey V. Godwin, DirectorArizona Radiation Regulatory Agency 4814 South 40 Street Phoenix, AZ  85040Mr. Craig K. Seaman, General ManagerRegulatory Affairs and Performance Improvement Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Mail Station 7636 P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ  85072-2034Mr. Matthew BenacAssistant Vice President Nuclear & Generation Services El Paso Electric Company 340 East Palm Lane, Suite 310 Phoenix, AZ 85004Mr. John TaylorPublic Service Company of New Mexico 2401 Aztec NE, MS Z110 Albuquerque, NM 87107-4224Mr. Thomas D. ChampSouthern California Edison Company 5000 Pacific Coast Hwy Bldg D1B San Clemente, CA 92672Mr. Robert HenrySalt River Project 6504 East Thomas Road Scottsdale, AZ 85251Mr. Jeffrey T. WeikertAssistant General Counsel El Paso Electric Company Mail Location 167 123 W. M illsEl Paso, TX 79901Mr. John SchumannLos Angeles Department of Water & Power Southern California Public Power Authority P.O. Box 51111, Room 1255-C Los Angeles, CA 90051-0100Mr. Brian AlmonPublic Utility Commission William B. Travis Building P. O. Box 13326 1701 North Congress Avenue Austin, TX 78701-3326Ms. Karen O'ReganEnvironmental Program Manager City of Phoenix Office of Environmental Programs 200 West Washington Street Phoenix AZ 85003}}
Palo Verde Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 cc:
Mr. Steve Olea                        Mr. John Taylor Arizona Corporation Commission        Public Service Company of New Mexico 1200 W. Washington Street            2401 Aztec NE, MS Z110 Phoenix, AZ 85007                    Albuquerque, NM 87107-4224 Mr. Douglas Kent Porter              Mr. Thomas D. Champ Senior Counsel                        Southern California Edison Company Southern California Edison Company    5000 Pacific Coast Hwy Bldg D1B Law Department, Generation Resources  San Clemente, CA 92672 P.O. Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770                    Mr. Robert Henry Salt River Project Senior Resident Inspector            6504 East Thomas Road U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission    Scottsdale, AZ 85251 P. O. Box 40 Buckeye, AZ 85326                    Mr. Jeffrey T. Weikert Assistant General Counsel Regional Administrator, Region IV    El Paso Electric Company U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission    Mail Location 167 Harris Tower & Pavillion              123 W. Mills 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400      El Paso, TX 79901 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 Mr. John Schumann Chairman                              Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Maricopa County Board of Supervisors  Southern California Public Power Authority 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor          P.O. Box 51111, Room 1255-C Phoenix, AZ 85003                    Los Angeles, CA 90051-0100 Mr. Aubrey V. Godwin, Director        Mr. Brian Almon Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency  Public Utility Commission 4814 South 40 Street                  William B. Travis Building Phoenix, AZ 85040                    P. O. Box 13326 1701 North Congress Avenue Mr. Craig K. Seaman, General Manager  Austin, TX 78701-3326 Regulatory Affairs and Performance Improvement              Ms. Karen O'Regan Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Environmental Program Manager Mail Station 7636                    City of Phoenix P.O. Box 52034                        Office of Environmental Programs Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034                200 West Washington Street Phoenix AZ 85003 Mr. Matthew Benac Assistant Vice President Nuclear & Generation Services El Paso Electric Company 340 East Palm Lane, Suite 310 Phoenix, AZ 85004 March 2006}}

Revision as of 18:22, 23 November 2019

Request for Additional Information Regarding Technical Specification Amendment Submittal (TAC Nos. MC9425, MC9426, and MC9427)
ML061710465
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 06/23/2006
From: Fields M
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLG
To: James M. Levine
Arizona Public Service Co
Fields M , NRR/ADPT,415-3062
References
TAC MC9425, TAC MC9426, TAC MC9427
Download: ML061710465 (6)


Text

June 23, 2006 Mr. James M. Levine Executive Vice President, Generation Mail Station 7602 Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034

SUBJECT:

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL (TAC NOS. MC9425, MC9426, AND MC9427)

Dear Mr. Levine:

By letter dated December 23, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a license amendment request for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The request is to extend the allowed out-of-service time for one inoperable emergency diesel generator from 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> to 10 days, add a clarifying note to Condition F of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, "AC [alternating current] Sources - Operating," and revise TS 3.4.9, "Pressurizer," to delete the words which require that the two groups of pressurizer heaters be capable of being powered from an emergency power supply.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided and determined that additional information is required in order to complete the evaluation. The additional information being requested is enclosed. As discussed with Glenn Michael of your staff, the NRC staff is requesting a response within 30 days of the date of this letter.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3062.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mel B. Fields, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos: STN 50-528, STN 50-529 and STN 50-530

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page

June 23, 2006 Mr. James M. Levine Executive Vice President, Generation Mail Station 7602 Arizona Public Service Company P.O. Box 52034 Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034

SUBJECT:

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 -

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL (TAC NOS. MC9425, MC9426, AND MC9427)

Dear Mr. Levine:

By letter dated December 23, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a license amendment request for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3. The request is to extend the allowed out-of-service time for one inoperable emergency diesel generator from 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> to 10 days, add a clarifying note to Condition F of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, "AC [alternating current] Sources - Operating," and revise TS 3.4.9, "Pressurizer," to delete the words which require that the two groups of pressurizer heaters be capable of being powered from an emergency power supply.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information provided and determined that additional information is required in order to complete the evaluation. The additional information being requested is enclosed. As discussed with Glenn Michael of your staff, the NRC staff is requesting a response within 30 days of the date of this letter.

If you have any questions, please contact me at 301-415-3062.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Mel B. Fields, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch IV Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos: STN 50-528, STN 50-529 and STN 50-530

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC LPLIV Reading RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrDorlLpl4 RidsRgn4MailCenter (TPruett)

RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsNrrLALFeizollahi RidsNrrPMMFields RidsOgcRp ADAMS ACCESSION NO: ML061710465 OFFICE LPL4/PM LPL4/LA LPL4/BC NAME MFields LFeizollahi DTerao DATE 06/22/06 06/22/06 06/23/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, ET AL.

PALO VERDE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION, UNITS 1, 2, AND 3 DOCKET NOS. STN 50-528, STN 50-529, AND STN 50-530 By letter dated December 23, 2005, Arizona Public Service Company submitted a license amendment request for the Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station (PVNGS), Units 1, 2, and 3.

The request is to extend the allowed out-of-service time (AOT) for one inoperable emergency diesel generator (EDG) from 72 hours8.333333e-4 days <br />0.02 hours <br />1.190476e-4 weeks <br />2.7396e-5 months <br /> to 10 days, add a clarifying note to Condition F of Technical Specification (TS) 3.8.1, "AC [alternating current] Sources - Operating," and revise TS 3.4.9, "Pressurizer," to delete the words which require that the two groups of pressurizer heaters be capable of being powered from an emergency power supply.

The staff has reviewed the information provided and determined that the following additional information is required in order to complete the evaluation.

1. Provide a qualitative or quantitative assessment of the following risk changes:

- Information on risk-important components and configuration that will be affected by the proposed extension, including Diesel Fuel Oil and Pressurizer Heaters.

- Please provide a brief discussion and related information regarding the risk quantification tool.

- Provide a discussion of the probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) quality, with emphasis on the system(s) and train(s) affected by the amendment. The discussion may include parametric uncertainty.

- Please provide relative risk impact on incremental conditional core damage probability (ICCDP) and incremental conditional large early release probability (ICLERP), using zero maintenance model versus regular model with baseline test/maintenance activities.

- Are there any compensatory measures to mitigate the potential risk increases due to the amendment? If so, provide a discussion of the proposed compensatory measures and the associated benefit in both quantifiable and non-quantifiable terms.

- Provide a brief discussion of the plant configuration control program and the on-line risk monitor.

2. Your risk assessment in the submittal was based on internal events only. Discuss the impact of potential external events and risk contributors, such as fire.
3. On page 17 of Enclosure 2 you state that your ICCDP would exceed the Regulatory Guide (RG) guideline. The intent in making the comparison of the PRA results with RG 1.177 is to demonstrate, with reasonable assurance, that Principle 4 in the Discussion section of RG 1.177 is being met. Please discuss how Principle 4 is being met.
4. In Table 3, Enclosure 2 of your request letter, you have recalculated internal event core damage frequency based on your new reliability number. However, Table 2 of the enclosure clearly indicated that the plant risk (ICCDP) under the proposed amendment would increase by 6.44E-7 and 6.05E-7 for EDG A and EDG B, respectively. With this proposed TS change, it appears that the risk would increase by 6.44E-7/yr and 6.05E-7/yr, respectively, by annualizing the ICCDP for one year. Please explain these results.
5. In your reliability recalculation presented in the second paragraph of page 17 of Enclosure 2, the increase of the actual unavailability was assumed as 5.5 days instead of the 10-day proposed extension. The 5.5 days of maintenance outage discussed implies that the TS AOT will be used as a part of your routine online maintenance activities. Please explain.
6. Please discuss the impacts of the uncertainties and risk contributors for both those explicitly accounted for in the results and those that were not.
7. According to your risk assessment, EDG A has higher risk importance than that of EDG B. Please Explain.
8. What are the risk assessment methodologies (such as FIVE) that you have employed for fire? Have you considered providing fire watch during the proposed AOT period?
9. As a part of maintenance activities associated with EDGs, is this extension a part of the routine maintenance activities? Please elaborate.
10. In diesel generator reliability, have you evaluated the Maintenance Preventable Function Failure (MPFF) under the 50.65 maintenance rule? If so, have you incorporated the MPFF in your EDG reliability?
11. How does this extension impact the station blackout (SBO) sequences? Please discuss your reliability program in general and specifically the ability and timing of the EDGs to recover from an SBO event.

Palo Verde Generating Station, Units 1, 2, and 3 cc:

Mr. Steve Olea Mr. John Taylor Arizona Corporation Commission Public Service Company of New Mexico 1200 W. Washington Street 2401 Aztec NE, MS Z110 Phoenix, AZ 85007 Albuquerque, NM 87107-4224 Mr. Douglas Kent Porter Mr. Thomas D. Champ Senior Counsel Southern California Edison Company Southern California Edison Company 5000 Pacific Coast Hwy Bldg D1B Law Department, Generation Resources San Clemente, CA 92672 P.O. Box 800 Rosemead, CA 91770 Mr. Robert Henry Salt River Project Senior Resident Inspector 6504 East Thomas Road U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Scottsdale, AZ 85251 P. O. Box 40 Buckeye, AZ 85326 Mr. Jeffrey T. Weikert Assistant General Counsel Regional Administrator, Region IV El Paso Electric Company U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Mail Location 167 Harris Tower & Pavillion 123 W. Mills 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 El Paso, TX 79901 Arlington, TX 76011-8064 Mr. John Schumann Chairman Los Angeles Department of Water & Power Maricopa County Board of Supervisors Southern California Public Power Authority 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor P.O. Box 51111, Room 1255-C Phoenix, AZ 85003 Los Angeles, CA 90051-0100 Mr. Aubrey V. Godwin, Director Mr. Brian Almon Arizona Radiation Regulatory Agency Public Utility Commission 4814 South 40 Street William B. Travis Building Phoenix, AZ 85040 P. O. Box 13326 1701 North Congress Avenue Mr. Craig K. Seaman, General Manager Austin, TX 78701-3326 Regulatory Affairs and Performance Improvement Ms. Karen O'Regan Palo Verde Nuclear Generating Station Environmental Program Manager Mail Station 7636 City of Phoenix P.O. Box 52034 Office of Environmental Programs Phoenix, AZ 85072-2034 200 West Washington Street Phoenix AZ 85003 Mr. Matthew Benac Assistant Vice President Nuclear & Generation Services El Paso Electric Company 340 East Palm Lane, Suite 310 Phoenix, AZ 85004 March 2006