ML073100504: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:From: <junehmuller@earthlink.net>
{{#Wiki_filter:From:         <junehmuller@earthlink.net>
To:   <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov> Date:   10/10/2007 12:47:53 AM
To:           <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Date:         10/10/2007 12:47:53 AM


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Indian Point EIS Comments
Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham
 
Bo Pham  


==Dear Bo Pham,==
==Dear Bo Pham,==


I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission  
I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:
 
1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),
address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact St atement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:  
conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.
 
Sincerely, June Muller 250 W 94th St New York, NY 10025-6954
1: the impacts of a terrorist a ttack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reserv oir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents;  
 
2: the impacts of Indian Poin t's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies;  
 
3: the build-up of high-level r adioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks or iginating from at least two spent fuel pools;  
 
4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a  
 
combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal), conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.  
 
Sincerely, June Muller  
 
250 W 94th St  
 
New York, NY 10025-6954  


Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number:   39   Mail Envelope Properties   (47306F76.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000017.1.18ECC8.1)
Federal Register Notice:     72FR45075 Comment Number:               39 Mail Envelope Properties (47306F76.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000017.1.18ECC8.1)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date:   10/10/2007 12:47:53 AM From:   <junehmuller@earthlink.net>
Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date:       10/10/2007 12:47:53 AM From:                 <junehmuller@earthlink.net>
Created By:   junehmuller@earthlink.net  
Created By:           junehmuller@earthlink.net Recipients
 
<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>
Recipients    <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>  
Post Office                                       Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01                                 nrc.gov Files                         Size               Date & Time MESSAGE                       1081               10/10/2007 12:47:53 AM Mime.822                     1924               11/6/2007 1:43:18 PM Options Priority:                     Standard Reply Requested:             No Return Notification:         None None Concealed  
 
Post Office       Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01       nrc.gov
 
Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1081     10/10/2007 12:47:53 AM Mime.822   1924     11/6/2007 1:43:18 PM Options Priority:     Standard   Reply Requested:   No   Return Notification:   None     None  
 
Concealed  


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
No Security:     Standard}}
No Security:                     Standard}}

Revision as of 01:08, 23 November 2019

2007/10/10 - Comment (39) Regarding Iplr Scoping
ML073100504
Person / Time
Site: Indian Point  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 10/10/2007
From: Public Commenter
Public Commenter
To:
Division of License Renewal
References
72FR45075
Download: ML073100504 (2)


Text

From: <junehmuller@earthlink.net>

To: <IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Date: 10/10/2007 12:47:53 AM

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Bo Pham

Dear Bo Pham,

I formally request that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission address the following environmental and public health issues in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement for the Indian Point nuclear power plant:

1: the impacts of a terrorist attack or large-scale accident at Indian Point on the Croton Reservoir, a drinking water supply for New York City and Westchester County residents; 2: the impacts of Indian Point's once-through cooling system on the Hudson River fish populations - including entrainment, impingement, and thermal pollution - using the most current scientific studies; 3: the build-up of high-level radioactive waste at Indian Point and the ongoing radioactive leaks originating from at least two spent fuel pools; 4: the alternatives to Indian Point's nuclear power, using a combination of renewable energy (wind, solar, geothermal),

conservation, and clean natural gas, as offered by the 2006 National Academy of Sciences report.

Sincerely, June Muller 250 W 94th St New York, NY 10025-6954

Federal Register Notice: 72FR45075 Comment Number: 39 Mail Envelope Properties (47306F76.HQGWDO01.OWGWPO04.200.2000017.1.18ECC8.1)

Subject:

Indian Point EIS Comments Creation Date: 10/10/2007 12:47:53 AM From: <junehmuller@earthlink.net>

Created By: junehmuller@earthlink.net Recipients

<IndianPointEIS@nrc.gov>

Post Office Route OWGWPO04.HQGWDO01 nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1081 10/10/2007 12:47:53 AM Mime.822 1924 11/6/2007 1:43:18 PM Options Priority: Standard Reply Requested: No Return Notification: None None Concealed

Subject:

No Security: Standard