ML111650038: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:Seabrook Station Assessment MeetingSeabrook StationSafety Performance in 2010
{{#Wiki_filter:Seabrook Station Assessment Meeting Seabrook Station Safety Performance in 2010
&&U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events2010 Reactor Oversight ProcessNuclear Regulatory Commission -Region I 1
                      &
NRC Representatives*James Clifford-Deputy Dir ector, Division of Reactor Projects*Arthur Burritt -Branch Chief *William Raymond -Senior Resident Inspector  
U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1
*Jonathan Johnson -Resident Inspector 2
 
Agenda*Introduction*Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook*Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events*NRC to address public questions
NRC Representatives
*Closing remarks 3  
* James Clifford- Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects
*NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner thatpreserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
* Arthur Burritt - Branch Chief
NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix*Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4  
* William Raymond - Senior Resident Inspector
*6753hours of inspection and related activities
* Jonathan Johnson - Resident Inspector 2
*2 resident inspectors on site -residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events atanytime Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook at any time*3  major team inspections
 
*CDBI*Emergency Planning
Agenda
*PI&R 5  
* Introduction
*AllGreenPerformanceJanuary 1 through December 31, 2010Performance Indicator and Inspection Results Seabrook All Green Performance Indicators
* Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook
*3 Green inspection finding 6
* Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events
NRC Action Matrix Licensee ResponseRegulatory Response Degraded CornerstoneMultiple Repetitive Degraded CornerstoneUnacceptable PerformanceAll Inputs are Green; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet1 or 2 White Inputs; Cornerstone Objectives FullyMet2 White or 1 Yellow Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
* NRC to address public questions
ModerateMultiple Yellow Inputs or 1 Red Input; Cornerstone Objectives Met w/
* Closing remarks 3
SignificantOverall Unacceptable Performance; Plants not permitted to Operatew/inthis
 
*Increasing safety significance
NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook
*IncreasingNRC inspection efforts
* NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
*Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
* Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
*Increasing regulatory actions Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Degradation in Safety Performance Significant Degradation in Safety Performance Operate w/in this Column; Unacceptable Margin to Safety
* Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4
*Seabrook was operated safely
 
*Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook
*Baselineinspectionsplannedfor2011 2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8 Seabrook Assessment MeetingU.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9
* 6753 hours of inspection and related activities
U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe*NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
* 2 resident inspectors on site - residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events at any time
*NRCrequiresadefense
* 3  major team inspections
-in-depthapproachto NRC requires a defense indepth approach to safety*NRC performs independent safety inspections
* CDBI
*NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10 Designed forSite Specific Natural Events*Earthquakes*Tsunamis*Hurricanes
* Emergency Planning
*Floods
* PI&R 5
*Tornadoes 11 The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth*Redundant and diverse safety systems*Multiplephysicalbarriersto
 
*Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material*Testing and inspection of systems important to safety*Emergency planning 12 NRC Independent Safety InspectionsReactor Oversight Program
Performance Indicator and Inspection Results January 1 through December 31, 2010 Seabrook
*NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
* All Green Performance Indicators
*At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant  
* 3 Green inspection finding 6
*NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13 NRC Requires Safety ImprovementsNRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:
 
*NRC operating experience program 14*Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
NRC Action Matrix Licensee       Regulatory      Degraded       Multiple Repetitive     Unacceptable Response        Response      Cornerstone          Degraded           Performance Cornerstone All Inputs are   1 or 2 White   2 White or 1   Multiple Yellow Inputs      Overall Green;          Inputs;      Yellow Input;     or 1 Red Input;         Unacceptable Cornerstone      Cornerstone    Cornerstone          Cornerstone       Performance; Plants Objectives      Objectives  Objectives Met w/  Objectives Met w/       not permitted to Fully Met        Fully Met      Moderate            Significant      Operate w/in this Degradation in  Degradation in Safety        Column; Safety          Performance          Unacceptable Performance                            Margin to Safety
*Post TMI Actions
* Increasing safety significance
*Post 9/11 Orders
* Increasing NRC inspection efforts
*Generic Safety Issues NRC Response to Events in Japan *NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review*Near-term actions (<90 days)conductingadditional 15-conducting additional inspections-identifying near term operational issues*Longer-term actions Director's Comments Jim Clifford 16 Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I Meeting Ground Rules1.Please be respectful to the speaker -only one speaker at a time2.See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.3.NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17 Questions 18 Contacting the NRC*Report a safety concern
* Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
*1-800-695-7403
* Increasing regulatory actions
*allegation@nrc.gov
 
*General questions
2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary
*www.nrc.gov
* Seabrook was operated safely
*Region I Public Affairs
* Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
*Diane Screnci, 610-332-5330 or diane.screnci@nrc.gov
* Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8
*Neil Sheehan, 610-332-5331 or neil.sheehan@nrc.gov 19}}
 
Seabrook Assessment Meeting U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9
 
U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe
* NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
* NRC requires a defense defense-in-depth in depth approach to safety
* NRC performs independent safety inspections
* NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10
 
Designed for Site Specific Natural Events
* Earthquakes
* Tsunamis
* Hurricanes
* Floods
* Tornadoes 11
 
The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth
* Redundant and diverse safety systems
* Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material
* Testing and inspection of systems important to safety
* Emergency planning 12
 
NRC Independent Safety Inspections Reactor Oversight Program
* NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
* At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
* NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13
 
NRC Requires Safety Improvements NRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:
* NRC operating experience program
* Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
* Post TMI Actions
* Post 9/11 Orders
* Generic Safety Issues 14
 
NRC Response to Events in Japan
* NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review
* Near-term actions (<90 days)
  - conducting additional inspections
  - identifying near term operational issues
* Longer-term actions 15
 
Directors Comments Jim Clifford Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I 16
 
Meeting Ground Rules
: 1. Please be respectful to the speaker - only one speaker at a time
: 2. See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.
: 3. NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17
 
Questions 18
 
Contacting the NRC
* Report a safety concern
* 1-800-695-7403
* allegation@nrc.gov
* General questions
* www.nrc.gov
* Region I Public Affairs
* Diane Screnci, 610-332-5330 or diane.screnci@nrc.gov
* Neil Sheehan, 610-332-5331 or neil.sheehan@nrc.gov 19}}

Revision as of 19:41, 12 November 2019

Aam Slides, June 8, 2011
ML111650038
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/08/2011
From: Arthur Burritt
Reactor Projects Branch 3
To:
burritt al
References
Download: ML111650038 (19)


Text

Seabrook Station Assessment Meeting Seabrook Station Safety Performance in 2010

&

U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in light of Japan Events 2010 Reactor Oversight Process Nuclear Regulatory Commission - Region I 1

NRC Representatives

  • James Clifford- Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Projects
  • William Raymond - Senior Resident Inspector
  • Jonathan Johnson - Resident Inspector 2

Agenda

  • Introduction
  • Discussion of safety performance at Seabrook
  • Discussion of U.S. nuclear plant safety in light of Japan events
  • NRC to address public questions
  • Closing remarks 3

NRC Assessment Summary Seabrook

  • NextEra operated Seabrook safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment.
  • Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections planned for 2011 4

Inspection Activities 2010 Seabrook

  • 6753 hours0.0782 days <br />1.876 hours <br />0.0112 weeks <br />0.00257 months <br /> of inspection and related activities
  • 2 resident inspectors on site - residents perform inspections daily and can respond to plant events at any time
  • 3 major team inspections
  • Emergency Planning

Performance Indicator and Inspection Results January 1 through December 31, 2010 Seabrook

  • All Green Performance Indicators
  • 3 Green inspection finding 6

NRC Action Matrix Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple Repetitive Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Degraded Performance Cornerstone All Inputs are 1 or 2 White 2 White or 1 Multiple Yellow Inputs Overall Green; Inputs; Yellow Input; or 1 Red Input; Unacceptable Cornerstone Cornerstone Cornerstone Cornerstone Performance; Plants Objectives Objectives Objectives Met w/ Objectives Met w/ not permitted to Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Significant Operate w/in this Degradation in Degradation in Safety Column; Safety Performance Unacceptable Performance Margin to Safety

  • Increasing safety significance
  • Increasing NRC inspection efforts
  • Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement
  • Increasing regulatory actions

2010 Seabrook Assessment Summary

  • Seabrook was operated safely
  • Licensee Response column of the Action Matrix
  • Baseline inspections planned for 2011 8

Seabrook Assessment Meeting U.S. Nuclear Plant Safety in Light of Japan Events 9

U.S. Nuclear Plants Remain Safe

  • NRC requires plants to be designed to withstand external events
  • NRC requires a defense defense-in-depth in depth approach to safety
  • NRC performs independent safety inspections
  • NRC assesses new safety information and requires improvements 10

Designed for Site Specific Natural Events

  • Tsunamis
  • Hurricanes
  • Floods
  • Tornadoes 11

The NRC Requires Defense-In-Depth

  • Redundant and diverse safety systems
  • Multiple physical barriers to contain radioactive material
  • Testing and inspection of systems important to safety
  • Emergency planning 12

NRC Independent Safety Inspections Reactor Oversight Program

  • NRC inspectors have unfettered access to all plant activities related to nuclear safety and security
  • At least two full-time NRC resident inspectors at each nuclear plant
  • NRC specialists conduct additional inspections at each nuclear plant 13

NRC Requires Safety Improvements NRC assesses new safety information, develops lessons learned, and requires safety enhancements:

  • NRC operating experience program
  • Rulemaking (Station Blackout)
  • Post TMI Actions
  • Post 9/11 Orders
  • Generic Safety Issues 14

NRC Response to Events in Japan

  • NRC conducting a methodical and systematic review
  • Near-term actions (<90 days)

- conducting additional inspections

- identifying near term operational issues

  • Longer-term actions 15

Directors Comments Jim Clifford Deputy Director Division of Reactor Projects Region I 16

Meeting Ground Rules

1. Please be respectful to the speaker - only one speaker at a time
2. See NRC staff if you have procedural questions/concerns or still want to sign up.
3. NRC staff members will be available after the meeting to talk to those interested 17

Questions 18

Contacting the NRC

  • Report a safety concern
  • 1-800-695-7403
  • allegation@nrc.gov
  • General questions
  • www.nrc.gov
  • Region I Public Affairs