ML11263A073: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:I.-j 4 Doyle, Daniel From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:39 PM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie; Imboden, Andy  
{{#Wiki_filter:I.                                                                                                             -j 4 Doyle, Daniel From:                       Doyle, Daniel Sent:                       Friday, January 28, 2011 3:39 PM To:                         Logan, Dennis Cc:                         Perkins, Leslie; Imboden, Andy


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Categories:
RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Categories:                 Salem Hope Creek Ok, please let me know when you have an expected completion date.
Salem Hope Creek Ok, please let me know when you have an expected completion date.Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (301) 415-3748 From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:37 PM To: Beissel, Dennis; Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy  
Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.doyle*.nrc.qov (301) 415-3748 From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:37 PM To: Beissel, Dennis; Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dan, Mine will take longer. I am still trying to find some of the background documents and to determine how long response will take.Dennis L From: Beissel, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:34 PM To: Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy  
RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dan, Mine will take longer. I am still trying to find some of the background documents and to determine how long response will take.
Dennis L From: Beissel, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:34 PM To: Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Hi Dan, I will do the response to comments for SHP, but I don't think they can be done by next Thursday Feb 3. A more realistic date considering my current workload is COB Feb 1 5 th I discussed this with Andy and he agrees with my assessment.
RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Hi Dan, I will do the response to comments for SHP, but I don't think they can be done by next Thursday Feb
Of course, I will try to finish these sooner. Thanks, Dennis From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:14 PM To: Beissel, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie  
: 3. A more realistic date considering my current workload is COB Feb 1 5 th I discussed this with Andy and he agrees with my assessment. Of course, I will try to finish these sooner. Thanks, Dennis From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:14 PM To: Beissel, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dennis, Please take a look at the attached hydro comments for the Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS.They are mostly from the state of NJ Dept of Environmental Protection.
Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dennis, Please take a look at the attached hydro comments for the Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS.
32 Note that comments SHC-W-21 through SHC-W-28 (from the New Jersey Geological Survey) are actually about the applicant's ER, not the DSEIS.I attached the comment letter from NJ so you can take a look at that.. .the comments from the NJ Geological people are on pp 6-8 of the pdf.I would like to receive your responses by next Thursday (Feb 3).FYI: Salem ER: http://www.nrc.qov/reactors/operatinq/licensinq/renewal/apilications/salem/salem-envir-rpt.pdf Hope Creek ER: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensinq/renewal/applications/hope-creek/hope-creek-envir-rpt.pdf Thanks, Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.dovle~a, nrc.qov (301) 415-3748 33}}
They are mostly from the state of NJ Dept of Environmental Protection.
32
 
Note that comments SHC-W-21 through SHC-W-28 (from the New Jersey Geological Survey) are actually about the applicant's ER, not the DSEIS.
I attached the comment letter from NJ so you can take a look at that.. .the comments from the NJ Geological people are on pp 6-8 of the pdf.
I would like to receive your responses by next Thursday (Feb 3).
FYI:
Salem ER: http://www.nrc.qov/reactors/operatinq/licensinq/renewal/apilications/salem/salem-envir-rpt.pdf Hope Creek ER: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensinq/renewal/applications/hope-creek/hope-creek-envir-rpt.pdf
: Thanks, Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.dovle~a, nrc.qov (301) 415-3748 33}}

Latest revision as of 15:22, 12 November 2019

Email from D. Doyle, NRR to D. Beissel, NRR Salem/Hope Creek Hydro Comments
ML11263A073
Person / Time
Site: Salem, Hope Creek  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 01/28/2011
From: Dan Doyle
Division of License Renewal
To: Logan D
Division of License Renewal
References
FOIA/PA-2011-0113
Download: ML11263A073 (2)


Text

I. -j 4 Doyle, Daniel From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:39 PM To: Logan, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie; Imboden, Andy

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Categories: Salem Hope Creek Ok, please let me know when you have an expected completion date.

Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.doyle*.nrc.qov (301) 415-3748 From: Logan, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:37 PM To: Beissel, Dennis; Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dan, Mine will take longer. I am still trying to find some of the background documents and to determine how long response will take.

Dennis L From: Beissel, Dennis Sent: Friday, January 28, 2011 3:34 PM To: Doyle, Daniel Cc: Imboden, Andy

Subject:

RE: Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Hi Dan, I will do the response to comments for SHP, but I don't think they can be done by next Thursday Feb

3. A more realistic date considering my current workload is COB Feb 1 5 th I discussed this with Andy and he agrees with my assessment. Of course, I will try to finish these sooner. Thanks, Dennis From: Doyle, Daniel Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 3:14 PM To: Beissel, Dennis Cc: Perkins, Leslie

Subject:

Salem/Hope Creek hydro comments Dennis, Please take a look at the attached hydro comments for the Salem/Hope Creek DSEIS.

They are mostly from the state of NJ Dept of Environmental Protection.

32

Note that comments SHC-W-21 through SHC-W-28 (from the New Jersey Geological Survey) are actually about the applicant's ER, not the DSEIS.

I attached the comment letter from NJ so you can take a look at that.. .the comments from the NJ Geological people are on pp 6-8 of the pdf.

I would like to receive your responses by next Thursday (Feb 3).

FYI:

Salem ER: http://www.nrc.qov/reactors/operatinq/licensinq/renewal/apilications/salem/salem-envir-rpt.pdf Hope Creek ER: http://www.nrc.gov/reactors/operating/licensinq/renewal/applications/hope-creek/hope-creek-envir-rpt.pdf

Thanks, Dan Doyle Project Manager Division of License Renewal U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission daniel.dovle~a, nrc.qov (301) 415-3748 33