ML15182A392: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. David A. Heacock President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd. Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711 July 7, 2015
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 7, 2015 Mr. David A. Heacock President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 -STAFF REVIEW OF INTERIM EVALUATION ASSOCIATED WITH REEVALUATED SEISMIC HAZARD IMPLEMENTATING NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1 (TAC NOS. MF5252 AND MF5253)  
NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - STAFF REVIEW OF INTERIM EVALUATION ASSOCIATED WITH REEVALUATED SEISMIC HAZARD IMPLEMENTATING NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1 (TAC NOS. MF5252 AND MF5253)


==Dear Mr. Heacock:==
==Dear Mr. Heacock:==
By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter). The request was issued as part of implementing lessons-learned from the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant. Enclosure 1 to the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees reevaluate seismic hazards at their sites using present-day methodologies and guidance.
 
Enclosure 1, Item 6, of the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees identify "interim evaluation and actions taken or planned to address the higher seismic hazard relative to the design basis as appropriate, prior to completion of the [seismic]
By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter). The request was issued as part of implementing lessons-learned from the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant.
risk evaluation." In addition to the interim evaluation provided in the March 2014 Seismic Screening and Hazard report, the licensees for the Central and Eastern United States committed to providing the Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) report, an interim evaluation, by December 31, 2014. By letter dated December 17, 20141, Virginia Electric and Power Company (the licensee), provided its ESEP report in a response to Enclosure 1, Item (6) of the 50.54(f) letter, for the North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (North Anna). The NRC staff assessed the licensee's implementation of the ESEP guidance through the completion of a reviewer checklist 2. Based on the NRC staff review of the ESEP report, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee's implementation of the interim evaluation meets the intent of the guidance.
Enclosure 1 to the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees reevaluate seismic hazards at their sites using present-day methodologies and guidance. Enclosure 1, Item 6, of the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees identify "interim evaluation and actions taken or planned to address the higher seismic hazard relative to the design basis as appropriate, prior to completion of the
[seismic] risk evaluation." In addition to the interim evaluation provided in the March 2014 Seismic Screening and Hazard report, the licensees for the Central and Eastern United States committed to providing the Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) report, an interim evaluation, by December 31, 2014.
By letter dated December 17, 20141, Virginia Electric and Power Company (the licensee),
provided its ESEP report in a response to Enclosure 1, Item (6) of the 50.54(f) letter, for the North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (North Anna). The NRC staff assessed the licensee's implementation of the ESEP guidance through the completion of a reviewer checklist 2 . Based on the NRC staff review of the ESEP report, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee's implementation of the interim evaluation meets the intent of the guidance.
The NRC staff concludes that, through the implementation of the ESEP guidance, the licensee identified and evaluated the seismic capacity of certain key installed Mitigating Strategies equipment that is used for core cooling and containment functions to cope with scenarios that involve a loss of all alternating current power and loss of access to the ultimate heat sink to withstand a seismic event up to two times the safe shutdown earthquake.
The NRC staff concludes that, through the implementation of the ESEP guidance, the licensee identified and evaluated the seismic capacity of certain key installed Mitigating Strategies equipment that is used for core cooling and containment functions to cope with scenarios that involve a loss of all alternating current power and loss of access to the ultimate heat sink to withstand a seismic event up to two times the safe shutdown earthquake.
1 The December 17, 2014, letter can be found under ADAMS Accession No. ML14357A059.
1 The December 17, 2014, letter can be found under ADAMS Accession No. ML14357A059.
2 The North Anna ESEP NRC review checklist can be found under ADAMS Accession No.ML15179A008.
2 The North Anna ESEP NRC review checklist can be found under ADAMS Accession No.ML15179A008.
D. Heacock The licensee's ESEP assessment provides additional assurance which supports continued plant safety while the longer-term seismic evaluation is completed to support regulatory decision making. The NRC staff concludes that the licensee responded appropriately to Enclosure 1, Item (6) of the 50.54(f) letter. Application of this review is limited to the interim evaluation as part of Recommendation 2.1 Seismic review. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1115 or via e-mail at Nicholas.DiFrancesco@nrc.gov.
 
Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339 cc: Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, Nicholas DiFrancesco, Senior Project Manager Hazards Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation D. Heacock The licensee's ESEP assessment provides additional assurance which supports continued plant safety while the longer-term seismic evaluation is completed to support regulatory decision making. The NRC staff concludes that the licensee responded appropriately to Enclosure 1, Item (6) of the 50.54(f) letter. Application of this review is limited to the interim evaluation as part of Recommendation 2.1 Seismic review. If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1115 or via e-mail at Nicholas.DiFrancesco@nrc.gov.
D. Heacock                                   The licensee's ESEP assessment provides additional assurance which supports continued plant safety while the longer-term seismic evaluation is completed to support regulatory decision making. The NRC staff concludes that the licensee responded appropriately to Enclosure 1, Item (6) of the 50.54(f) letter. Application of this review is limited to the interim evaluation as part of Recommendation 2.1 Seismic review.
Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339 cc: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1115 or via e-mail at Nicholas.DiFrancesco@nrc.gov.
PUBLIC LPL1-1 R/F JLD R/F RidsOeMaiiCenter RidsNrrPMPilgrim RidsNrrDorllpl3-1 RidsNrrLASLent RidsRgn3MaiiCenter RidsNrrOd DJackson, NRO MShams, NRR NDiFrancesco, NRR Sincerely, IRA/ Nicholas DiFrancesco, Senior Project Manager Hazards Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation ADAMS Accession No.: ML15182A392
Sincerely, Nicholas DiFrancesco, Senior Project Manager Hazards Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339 cc: Distribution via Listserv
* via concurrence e-mail OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NRR/JLD/LA DSEA/RGS2*
 
NAME SWyman Slent DJackson DATE 07/02/15 07/02/15 07/01/15 OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/BC NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NAME MShams NDiFrancesco DATE 07/03/15 07/07/15 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}
ML15182A392
* via concurrence e-mail OFFICE     NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM             NRR/JLD/LA                   DSEA/RGS2*
NAME       SWyman                     Slent                         DJackson DATE       07/02/15                   07/02/15                     07/01/15 OFFICE     NRR/JLD/JHMB/BC             NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NAME       MShams                     NDiFrancesco DATE       07/03/15                   07/07/15}}

Latest revision as of 09:32, 31 October 2019

Staff Review of Interim Evaluation Associated with Reevaluated Seismic Hazard Implementing Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.1 (TAC Nos. MF5252 and MF5253)
ML15182A392
Person / Time
Site: North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 07/07/2015
From: Nicholas Difrancesco
Japan Lessons-Learned Division
To: Heacock D
Japan Lessons-Learned Division
Wyman, Stephen 415-3041
References
TAC MF5252, TAC MF5253
Download: ML15182A392 (3)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 7, 2015 Mr. David A. Heacock President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.

Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711

SUBJECT:

NORTH ANNA POWER STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - STAFF REVIEW OF INTERIM EVALUATION ASSOCIATED WITH REEVALUATED SEISMIC HAZARD IMPLEMENTATING NEAR-TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.1 (TAC NOS. MF5252 AND MF5253)

Dear Mr. Heacock:

By letter dated March 12, 2012 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML12053A340), the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a request for information pursuant to Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations Part 50, Section 50.54(f) (hereafter referred to as the 50.54(f) letter). The request was issued as part of implementing lessons-learned from the accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant.

Enclosure 1 to the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees reevaluate seismic hazards at their sites using present-day methodologies and guidance. Enclosure 1, Item 6, of the 50.54(f) letter requested that licensees identify "interim evaluation and actions taken or planned to address the higher seismic hazard relative to the design basis as appropriate, prior to completion of the

[seismic] risk evaluation." In addition to the interim evaluation provided in the March 2014 Seismic Screening and Hazard report, the licensees for the Central and Eastern United States committed to providing the Expedited Seismic Evaluation Process (ESEP) report, an interim evaluation, by December 31, 2014.

By letter dated December 17, 20141, Virginia Electric and Power Company (the licensee),

provided its ESEP report in a response to Enclosure 1, Item (6) of the 50.54(f) letter, for the North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (North Anna). The NRC staff assessed the licensee's implementation of the ESEP guidance through the completion of a reviewer checklist 2 . Based on the NRC staff review of the ESEP report, the NRC staff concludes that the licensee's implementation of the interim evaluation meets the intent of the guidance.

The NRC staff concludes that, through the implementation of the ESEP guidance, the licensee identified and evaluated the seismic capacity of certain key installed Mitigating Strategies equipment that is used for core cooling and containment functions to cope with scenarios that involve a loss of all alternating current power and loss of access to the ultimate heat sink to withstand a seismic event up to two times the safe shutdown earthquake.

1 The December 17, 2014, letter can be found under ADAMS Accession No. ML14357A059.

2 The North Anna ESEP NRC review checklist can be found under ADAMS Accession No.ML15179A008.

D. Heacock The licensee's ESEP assessment provides additional assurance which supports continued plant safety while the longer-term seismic evaluation is completed to support regulatory decision making. The NRC staff concludes that the licensee responded appropriately to Enclosure 1, Item (6) of the 50.54(f) letter. Application of this review is limited to the interim evaluation as part of Recommendation 2.1 Seismic review.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-1115 or via e-mail at Nicholas.DiFrancesco@nrc.gov.

Sincerely, Nicholas DiFrancesco, Senior Project Manager Hazards Management Branch Japan Lessons-Learned Division Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-338 and 50-339 cc: Distribution via Listserv

ML15182A392

  • via concurrence e-mail OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NRR/JLD/LA DSEA/RGS2*

NAME SWyman Slent DJackson DATE 07/02/15 07/02/15 07/01/15 OFFICE NRR/JLD/JHMB/BC NRR/JLD/JHMB/PM NAME MShams NDiFrancesco DATE 07/03/15 07/07/15

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML15182A392&oldid=2031597"