ML17130A233: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:) J I I STEAM BREAKS AUTOMATIC
{{#Wiki_filter:\
..,.. ____________________________________
                                                                                                                        \
_
                                                                                                                          \
! MAXIMUM STEAM t' LINE BREAK HPCI .... ___________________________
  )
.... _____ __ I I D F ---------.----------------------------------------
I         STEAM BREAKS
..... -..... __________
    ..,.._____________________________________                                    I
..... LPCI I B I ----.------------------------------------------------
    ~-----*------DEPRESSURIZATION AUTOMATIC
                                                                                  !t'~      MAXIMUM STEAM LINE BREAK
    ....___________________________.... _____ __
HPCI                                                      I
    --- ------.----------------------------------------.....I
    ....._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..... LPCI D      F I-
          - - - - .------------------------------------------------...*
t---------------------__.I
    ~
B CORESPRAY I
II I
I I
I      LIQUID BREAKS I
    ....,_______________________ AUTOMATIC                                                I
    ~    - - - - - _ _ _ _ DEPRESSURIZATION                                              '~MAXIMUMRECIRCULATION LINE BREAK t-------,.*. _--_-------_-                  HPCI                                     I
    ---------...-----------------------------------------------------~
E                c t-----------------------..          1 LPCI
    ---- - --...-----------------------------------------------11111 t-------------------*
A 1
CORE SPRAY I
I              I                I              I          I        I  I          I 0            0.1            0.2              1.0            2.0        3.0      4.0          5.0          6.0
                                  ~
SCALE CHANGES BREAK AREA Ctt2)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CSCS'S PERFORMANCE J                                                                                                                                  CAPABILITY CHART FIGURE 6.3.1
 
PBAPS UFSAR Figure 6.4.1 thru 6.4.2 Deleted
 
PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Peak Cladding Temperature,                                UNITS 2 AND 3 Maximum Recirculation Suction Line Break,            UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, PEAK CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME Appendix K Assumptions DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT BREAK FIGURE 6.5.1                  REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 Water Level in Hot and Average Channels, UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Maximum Recirculation Suction Line Break, Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow,          WATER LEVELIN HOT AND AVERAGE CHANNEL VS.
Appendix K Assumptions                          TIME, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT BREAK FIGURE 6.5.2                  REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Reactor Vessel Pressure,                              UNITS 2 AND 3 Maximum Recirculation Suction Line Break,            UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, REACTOR PRESSURE VERSUS TIME Appendix K Assumptions                        DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT BREAK FIGURE 6.5.3                  REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Heat Transfer Coefficients,                            UNITS 2 AND 3 Maximum Recirculation Suction Line Break,            UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, Appendix K Assumptions                        HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS, MAXIMUM RECIRCULATION SUCTION LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.4                  REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Peak Cladding Temperature,                                        UNITS 2 AND 3 0.05 ft2 Recirculation Discharge Line Break,                UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, PEAK CLADDING TEMPERATURE Appendix K Assumptions                        0.05 FT2 RECIRCULATION DISCHARGE LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.5                  REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 Water Level in Hot and Average Channels,                UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 0.05 ft2 Recirculation Discharge Line Break, Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow,            WATER LEVEL IN HOT AND AVERAGE CHANNELS Appendix K Assumptions                      0.05 FT2 RECIRCULATION DISCHARGE LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.6                  REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Reactor Vessel Pressure,                                  UNITS 2 AND 3 0.05 ft2 Recirculation Discharge Line Break,          UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, Appendix K Assumptions                            REACTOR VESSEL PRESSURE 0.05 FT2 RECIRCULATION DISCHARGE LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.7                  REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR Heat Transfer Coefficients,                        PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION 2
0.05 ft Recirculation Discharge Line Break,                              UNITS 2 AND 3 Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow,                UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Appendix K Assumptions                                  HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS 0.05 FT2 RECIRCULATION DISCHARGE LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.8                    REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR FIGURE 6.5.9 DELETED REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR FIGURE 6.5.10 DELETED REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR FIGURE 6.5.11 DELETED REV. 26 04/17
 
PBAPS UFSAR FIGURE 6.5.12 DELETED REV. 26 04/17
 
2500 z
0 t 2000  llDIST IllTDllEDIATE -~7                                                          .._
u m                            ~                                                            a:
LLJ
                                                                                          <<
0                                                                          FAILURE d 1500                                                                                    ~
LI.I
~
                                                                                          .....
a:
                                                                                          ~
1000                                                                                0.2 ..J CZ:
                                                                                          ....
LU
                                                                                            ~
500                                                                                0.1 t-z w
u 0-+--------------------------------------------------------'-o                        "~
IJJ
      \0 ..                      10..                    \0 *                      \0 '
BREAK AREA< SQ fTl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS BREAK AREA, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS FIGURE 6. 7 .1
 
2500 u:  2000
-
* L
~                                                                  CORE REFLOODED CORE SPRAY INITIATED
-8
~ 1500 a:
d 1000 500 0-+------------------..------.~----...---------------~--~~~
0    100  200  300    'lOO      500        600        700        BOO  900 TJHE  (SECONDS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .02-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE  6. 7 .2
 
2500
--
*
: u. 2000                                                          CORE REFLOODED
~                                      CORE SPRAY INITIATED          '
-
~
z  1500
~
1000 500 0-+-----........------------------~-------------------------------..
0      100        200    soc        '100        500        800        ?00  800 TJrtE CSECt'HlSl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUf\;tPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7.3
 
2500 r    CORE REFLOODED COAE SPRAY INITIATED ~
-8
~ 1500 a:
d 1000 500 0-+-~---------------------------~----~---~~~~--~~---'-
10 0                10  I                        10 2                      10 I TJME CSECrJNOSJ PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS FIGURE 6.7.4
 
..-
    .a
    .&
    .2 0-1------------------.-------------------------------------P-o                s                        10                        lS TJHE (SECONDS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CORE FLOW FOLLOWING DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT VERSUS TIME FIGURE  6.7.5
 
I    I    I        I      f          I          f      f 10 I
: 10.                                                                      ...
~
0 I
...=
"-                                                                                ...
d        10 *-
en I
c:r
~
.........
::::>
....m u.... 10  J-                                                                  ....
  ~
10 ,_                                                                    ...
10  0      I    l    I        I      I          1            I      I 0 100  200  300    llOO    500        600        700    600  900 TIME (SECONDS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .02*SQ FT BREAK FIGURE  6. 7 .6
 
I    I    I          I          I            I        I 10 I                                                                    '-
10'                                                                      ...
LL' 0
I
.,..:
~
0 U>
I 10 *-                                                                      -
a:
'J:
.......
:::>
~
-
u m
~
'J:    10  1-                                                                    ...
10 ' -                                                                    ...
10  D          I                I          I            I        I 0 100 I
200  300'        "00        500          600    700    800 TIME(SECONOS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS,
                                                        .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE  6. 7. 7
 
I                        t 10  I r----___
to * -                                                                          ..
-
0 u..
I
  ~
u..
0Cf)
I to  1-                                                                          ..
a:
  %
........
  ~
t-
- m u
t-
  %
to                                                                                -
                                    ~
2-t0    I*                                                                          ..
          \0  D-'----------------------,-------------------.-,-------------------+-
10  0                10 I                      10 2                    10    I TIME(SECONOS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE  6.7.8
 
,-
60 so Tll'
  >
  &: ~    ------~~----------
20
          -------------------------
Ill' 10                                                          r CORE SPRAY INITIATED o----------------------------------------------------------          o      lOO  200                    500      600        700    BOO    900 TIME(SECONOS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL WATER LEVEL VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .02-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE  6. 7 .9
 
60
.!:-.. so id
>
~      'lO cc.
.......
~
>      30
~
20 10 r      CORE SPRAY llllTIATED 0-+-------------...------.----------------------------------~
0    100    200                1&00      500      600          100  BOO TIME (SECONDS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH aonoM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL WATER LEVEL VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6.7.10
 
60 so  to---
'10
~
fAf
      ---  ----------------- ----------
20    BAf 10 O+-------------...-......----------...-----------------------~-----+
0            so                    100                150                200 TIME (SECONDS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL WATER LEVEL VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.11
 
3 l
0-+-------------------------------------------------~--~~~._J..
0                  s                        10                        ts TIME (SECONDS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MINIMUM CRITICAL HEAT FLUX RATIO VERSUS TIME FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.12
 
                  .-  ..  ..          .-        .        .          .
2500 ..                                                                *
  --
IL 0
2000*
r    CORE REFLOODED i-I!
I!:!
0                        CORE SPRAY INITIATED 5u tSOO*
* ll::
    ~
1000-                                                                  -
500 ..                                                                -
0      I  I  I            I        I        I          I 0 100 200 900        '100        500      800        ?00      BOO TJHE *CSECrNlSl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME,
--                                        1,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS,
                                                        .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6.7.13
 
I
                  *  *
* I          I          t 2500-                                                                ..
--a:
0 u.. 2000-r  CORE REFLOODED
                                                                          ..
CORE SPRAY INITIATED
  ~
c cc                                                                      ,.
  --~ tSOO*
u
  ~
a:
  ~
1000-                                                                i-500-                                                                ,.
0    I  I  I            I        I          I          I 0 100 200 soo        'lOO        500        600        ?00    800 TJHE    (SECCHJS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 10,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS,
                                                    .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6.7.14
 
              .
              -
                  .
                  -
                      .           .         .         .           .
2500 ..                                                             .
--
* u.. 2000-r  CORE REFLOODED
                                                                          -
i:
~
CORE SPRAY INITIATED 0
_,
cc u
~
tSOO-                                                                -
cc
~
1000-                                                                ..
soo-                                                                ...
0    I  I  I            I        I        I           I 0 100 200 900        'lOO        500      600        ?OD    800 TJHE rSECM>Sl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 25,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS,
                                                    .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7.15
 
                                                                ~  CORE REFLOODED u:  2000
&deg;-
: n.                  CORE SPRAY INITIATED s::
~
0 5u  1500
~
a:
~
1000 500 0-+----------------------------~----~~--~~------------        10 0                  10 '                        10 I                    10.
TJHE f'SECrH>Sl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 1,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE  6.7.16
 
2500
                                                                      +-CORE REFLOODED
&L: 2000
-
*
~
~
~
CORE SPRAY INITIATED c
5u  1500
~
a:
H:!
1000 500 a10......0----------------------------------------------------_..
10'                        10.                      10 I TJHE tSECIN>Sl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 10,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE  6.7.17
 
2500 r  CORE REFLOODED IL
-
* 11..
2000                                                    '
2:
CORE SPRAY INITIATED
  ~
0 5u    1500 lt':
u:.
le 1000 500 0-+-------------------------------------------------------            10 0                10 '                        10.                    10.
TIHE CSECfNlSJ PHILADILPHIA ILICTRIC COMPANY PIACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWIR STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAPITY ANALYSIS RIPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 25,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORESPRAY SYSTEMS,AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6. 7.18
 
2SOO-
~
l
~  2000'-          \:"'""            l. PESIGN            --
8'9S/$ #ICC/DENT
~
~
              -
1
~  1.soo ...
Ll!lllJC llNTe~N'J~Dl4TE - ~GAi(
~
"
~
~
...
...
* t---------------------__.I CORESPRAY I I I I I I I LIQUID BREAKS I ...., _______________________
Q  /000 -
AUTOMATIC -----____ DEPRESSURIZATION RECIRCULATION LINE BREAK t-------,.*
Q
.. _--_-------_-
~
HPCI I E c ---------...
._J (J
t-----------------------
.soo -
.. 1 LPCI A -------... -----------------------------------------------11111 t-------------------*
~
1 CORE SPRAY I I I I I I I I 0 0.1 0.2 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 BREAK AREA Ctt2) SCALE CHANGES I 5.0 6.0 \ \ \ PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CSCS'S PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY CHART FIGURE 6.3.1 PBAPS UFSAR
Q.
0            I                         I 0       10000                    20000                    36600 FUEL      BUNDLE EXPOS/JR&#xa3; -      MWD/r PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAPITY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAKING FACTOR STUDY, EFFECT OF EXPOSURE ON MAXIMUM CLADDING TEMPERATURE FOR PEACH BOTTOM UNITS 2 AND 3 PIGURI 6.7.18a


Figure 6.4.1 thru 6.4.2 Deleted 
0.001 ~-------------------------------------------------------------....i..---------------
0.06                              1.0                      10                100          1,000 TIME AFTER ACCIDENT (SECONDS)
POWER GENERATION FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS LOCA ACCIDENT PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT POWER GENERATION FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS LOCA FIGURE 6.7.19


2500 t 2000 llDIST IllTDllEDIATE m 0 d 1500 FAILURE 1000 500 z 0 .._ u a: LLJ << LI.I ..... a: 0.2 ..J CZ: .... LU 0.1 z w u " IJJ 0-+--------------------------------------------------------'-o \0 .. 10.. \0 * \0 ' BREAK AREA< SQ fTl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS BREAK AREA, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS FIGURE 6. 7 .1 2500 u: 2000 * -L 1500 -8 a: d 1000 500 CORE REFLOODED CORE SPRAY INITIATED 0 100 200 300 'lOO 500 TJHE (SECONDS) 600 700 BOO 900 PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .02-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7 .2 
1.0----------------..-------......------...-------.------.,-------..,-----.......
-u. * -z -2500 2000 CORE REFLOODED
0.8
' CORE SPRAY INITIATED 1500 1000 500 0-+-----........
                                          \
0 100 200 soc '100 500 800 ?00 800 TJrtE CSECt'HlSl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUf\;tPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7 .3 2500 r CORE REFLOODED COAE SPRAY INITIATED 1500 -8 a: d 1000 500 10 0 10 I 10 2 10 I TJME CSECrJNOSJ PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS FIGURE 6.7.4 
                                            \
.. -.a .& .2 0-1------------------.-------------------------------------P-o s 10 lS TJHE (SECONDS)
0.6                                       \
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CORE FLOW FOLLOWING DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT VERSUS TIME FIGURE 6.7.5 10 I I I I I f I f f 10. ... 0 I ...= "-10 *-... d en I c:r .........
)-i 8
::::> .... m u 10 J-.... .... 10 ,_ ... 10 0 I l I I I 1 I I 0 100 200 300 llOO 500 600 700 600 900 TIME (SECONDS)
                                                \
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .02*SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7 .6 10 I I I I I I I I ' -10' ... LL' 0 I .,..: 0 10 *--U> I a: 'J: ....... :::> m -u 10 1-... 'J: 10 ' -... 10 D I I ' I I I I 0 100 200 300 "00 500 600 700 800 TIME(SECONOS)
H                                                  \
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7. 7 
H                                                   \
-u.. 0 I u.. 0 Cf) I a: % ........ t-m -u t-% 10 I I t r----___ to * -.. to 1-.. to 2--t0 I* .. \0 D-'----------------------,-------------------.-,-------------------+-
~
10 0 10 I 10 2 10 I TIME(SECONOS)
:::>
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.8 
()I 0.4 0.2 CHANNEL INLET QUALITY 0
,-> &: 60 so Tll' 20 Ill' -------------------------
0     2       4       6           8           10           12     14       16 TIME AFTER ACCIDENT ...           (SECONDS)
10 CORE SPRAY r INITIATED o---------------------------------------------------------- o lOO 200 500 600 700 BOO 900 TIME(SECONOS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL WATER LEVEL VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .02-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7 .9 
-... !: id > cc. .... ... > 60 so 'lO 30 20 CORE SPRAY 10 r llllTIATED 0 100 200 1&00 500 600 100 BOO TIME (SECONDS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH aonoM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL WATER LEVEL VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6.7.10 60 so to---'10 fAf --------------------
----------
20 BAf 10 O+-------------...-
......
0 so 100 TIME (SECONDS) 150 200 PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL WATER LEVEL VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.11 3 l 0 s TIME (SECONDS) 10 ts PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MINIMUM CRITICAL HEAT FLUX RATIO VERSUS TIME FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.12 
. . . . . . . -. . -2500 .. * -IL 2000* i-0 r CORE REFLOODED
-I! I!:! 0 CORE SPRAY INITIATED 5 tSOO*
* u ll:: 1000--500 .. -0 I I I I I I I 0 100 200 900 '100 500 800 ?00 BOO TJHE *CSECrNlSl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, --1,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6.7.13 I * *
* I I t 2500-.. -2000-.. u.. 0 r CORE REFLOODED
-a: CORE SPRAY INITIATED c cc tSOO* ,. u a: 1000-i-500-,. 0 I I I I I I I 0 100 200 soo 'lOO 500 600 ?00 800 TJHE (SECCHJS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 10,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6.7.14 
. . . . . . . --2500 .. .. -2000--u.. r CORE REFLOODED
* -i: 0 CORE SPRAY INITIATED cc tSOO--_, u cc 1000-.. soo-... 0 I I I I I I I 0 100 200 900 'lOO 500 600 ?OD 800 TJHE rSECM>Sl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 25,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7.15 u: 2000 &deg;-n. s:: 0 5 1500 u a: 1000 500 CORE REFLOODED CORE SPRAY INITIATED 10 0 10 ' 10 I 10. TJHE f'SECrH>Sl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 1,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.16 2500 &L: 2000 * -c 5 1500 u a: H:! 1000 500 +-CORE REFLOODED CORE SPRAY INITIATED a ...... ----------------------------------------------------_..
10 0 10' TJHE tSECIN>Sl
: 10. 10 I PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 10,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.17 2500 IL 2000 * -11.. 2: 0 5 1500 u lt': u:. le 1000 500 CORE SPRAY INITIATED r CORE REFLOODED
' 0-+------------------------------------------------------- 10 0 10 ' 10. 10. TIHE CSECfNlSJ PHILADILPHIA ILICTRIC COMPANY PIACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWIR STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAPITY ANALYSIS RIPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 25,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORESPRAY SYSTEMS,AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6. 7.18 2SOO-l 2000'--1.soo ... " ... /000 -Q Q ._J (J .soo -Q. 0 0 \:"'"" 1 L l!lllJC I 10000 FUEL BUNDLE l. PESIGN 8'9S/$ --#ICC/DENT
-
I 36600 20000 EXPOS/JR&#xa3;
-MWD/r PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAPITY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAKING FACTOR STUDY, EFFECT OF EXPOSURE ON MAXIMUM CLADDING TEMPERATURE FOR PEACH BOTTOM UNITS 2 AND 3 PIGURI 6.7.18a 0.001 0.06 1.0 10 100 1,000 TIME AFTER ACCIDENT (SECONDS)
POWER GENERATION FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS LOCA ACCIDENT PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT POWER GENERATION FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS LOCA FIGURE 6.7.19 
)-i 8 H H :::> ()I 1.0----------------..-------
...... ------...-------.------.,-------..,-----
....... 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 2 4 \ \ \ \ \ 6 8 \ CHANNEL INLET QUALITY 10 12 14 16 TIME AFTER ACCIDENT ... (SECONDS)
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT QUALITY VERSUS TIME FOR THE DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6. 7 .20}}
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT QUALITY VERSUS TIME FOR THE DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6. 7 .20}}

Revision as of 04:42, 30 October 2019

Revision 26 to Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Section 6.0, Core Standby Cooling Systems, Figures, Part 2 of 2
ML17130A233
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/06/2017
From:
Exelon Generation Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML17130A259 List: ... further results
References
Download: ML17130A233 (35)


Text

\

\

\

)

I STEAM BREAKS

..,.._____________________________________ I

~-----*------DEPRESSURIZATION AUTOMATIC

!t'~ MAXIMUM STEAM LINE BREAK

....___________________________.... _____ __

HPCI I

--- ------.----------------------------------------.....I

....._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _..... LPCI D F I-

- - - - .------------------------------------------------...*

t---------------------__.I

~

B CORESPRAY I

II I

I I

I LIQUID BREAKS I

....,_______________________ AUTOMATIC I

~ - - - - - _ _ _ _ DEPRESSURIZATION '~MAXIMUMRECIRCULATION LINE BREAK t-------,.*. _--_-------_- HPCI I


...-----------------------------------------------------~

E c t-----------------------.. 1 LPCI


- --...-----------------------------------------------11111 t-------------------*

A 1

CORE SPRAY I

I I I I I I I I 0 0.1 0.2 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0

~

SCALE CHANGES BREAK AREA Ctt2)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CSCS'S PERFORMANCE J CAPABILITY CHART FIGURE 6.3.1

PBAPS UFSAR Figure 6.4.1 thru 6.4.2 Deleted

PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Peak Cladding Temperature, UNITS 2 AND 3 Maximum Recirculation Suction Line Break, UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, PEAK CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME Appendix K Assumptions DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT BREAK FIGURE 6.5.1 REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 Water Level in Hot and Average Channels, UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Maximum Recirculation Suction Line Break, Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, WATER LEVELIN HOT AND AVERAGE CHANNEL VS.

Appendix K Assumptions TIME, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT BREAK FIGURE 6.5.2 REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Reactor Vessel Pressure, UNITS 2 AND 3 Maximum Recirculation Suction Line Break, UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, REACTOR PRESSURE VERSUS TIME Appendix K Assumptions DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT BREAK FIGURE 6.5.3 REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Heat Transfer Coefficients, UNITS 2 AND 3 Maximum Recirculation Suction Line Break, UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, Appendix K Assumptions HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS, MAXIMUM RECIRCULATION SUCTION LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.4 REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Peak Cladding Temperature, UNITS 2 AND 3 0.05 ft2 Recirculation Discharge Line Break, UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, PEAK CLADDING TEMPERATURE Appendix K Assumptions 0.05 FT2 RECIRCULATION DISCHARGE LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.5 REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 Water Level in Hot and Average Channels, UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT 0.05 ft2 Recirculation Discharge Line Break, Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, WATER LEVEL IN HOT AND AVERAGE CHANNELS Appendix K Assumptions 0.05 FT2 RECIRCULATION DISCHARGE LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.6 REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION Reactor Vessel Pressure, UNITS 2 AND 3 0.05 ft2 Recirculation Discharge Line Break, UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, Appendix K Assumptions REACTOR VESSEL PRESSURE 0.05 FT2 RECIRCULATION DISCHARGE LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.7 REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR Heat Transfer Coefficients, PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION 2

0.05 ft Recirculation Discharge Line Break, UNITS 2 AND 3 Battery Failure, EPU Power / MELLLA+ Core Flow, UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT Appendix K Assumptions HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENTS 0.05 FT2 RECIRCULATION DISCHARGE LINE BREAK FIGURE 6.5.8 REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR FIGURE 6.5.9 DELETED REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR FIGURE 6.5.10 DELETED REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR FIGURE 6.5.11 DELETED REV. 26 04/17

PBAPS UFSAR FIGURE 6.5.12 DELETED REV. 26 04/17

2500 z

0 t 2000 llDIST IllTDllEDIATE -~7 .._

u m ~ a:

LLJ

<<

0 FAILURE d 1500 ~

LI.I

~

.....

a:

~

1000 0.2 ..J CZ:

....

LU

~

500 0.1 t-z w

u 0-+--------------------------------------------------------'-o "~

IJJ

\0 .. 10.. \0 * \0 '

BREAK AREA< SQ fTl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS BREAK AREA, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS FIGURE 6. 7 .1

2500 u: 2000

-

  • L

~ CORE REFLOODED CORE SPRAY INITIATED

-8

~ 1500 a:

d 1000 500 0-+------------------..------.~----...---------------~--~~~

0 100 200 300 'lOO 500 600 700 BOO 900 TJHE (SECONDS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .02-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7 .2

2500

--

u. 2000 CORE REFLOODED

~ CORE SPRAY INITIATED '

-

~

z 1500

~

1000 500 0-+-----........------------------~-------------------------------..

0 100 200 soc '100 500 800 ?00 800 TJrtE CSECt'HlSl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CLADDING TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUf\;tPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7.3

2500 r CORE REFLOODED COAE SPRAY INITIATED ~

-8

~ 1500 a:

d 1000 500 0-+-~---------------------------~----~---~~~~--~~---'-

10 0 10 I 10 2 10 I TJME CSECrJNOSJ PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS FIGURE 6.7.4

..-

.a

.&

.2 0-1------------------.-------------------------------------P-o s 10 lS TJHE (SECONDS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT CORE FLOW FOLLOWING DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT VERSUS TIME FIGURE 6.7.5

I I I I f I f f 10 I

10. ...

~

0 I

...=

"- ...

d 10 *-

en I

c:r

~

.........

>

....m u.... 10 J- ....

~

10 ,_ ...

10 0 I l I I I 1 I I 0 100 200 300 llOO 500 600 700 600 900 TIME (SECONDS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .02*SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7 .6

I I I I I I I 10 I '-

10' ...

LL' 0

I

.,..:

~

0 U>

I 10 *- -

a:

'J:

.......

>

~

-

u m

~

'J: 10 1- ...

10 ' - ...

10 D I I I I I 0 100 I

200 300' "00 500 600 700 800 TIME(SECONOS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS,

.05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7. 7

I t 10 I r----___

to * - ..

-

0 u..

I

~

u..

0Cf)

I to 1- ..

a:

%

........

~

t-

- m u

t-

%

to -

~

2-t0 I* ..

\0 D-'----------------------,-------------------.-,-------------------+-

10 0 10 I 10 2 10 I TIME(SECONOS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT HEAT TRANSFER COEFFICIENT VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.8

,-

60 so Tll'

>

&: ~ ------~~----------

20


Ill' 10 r CORE SPRAY INITIATED o---------------------------------------------------------- o lOO 200 500 600 700 BOO 900 TIME(SECONOS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL WATER LEVEL VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .02-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7 .9

60

.!:-.. so id

>

~ 'lO cc.

.......

~

> 30

~

20 10 r CORE SPRAY llllTIATED 0-+-------------...------.----------------------------------~

0 100 200 1&00 500 600 100 BOO TIME (SECONDS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH aonoM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL WATER LEVEL VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS PLUS ADS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, .05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6.7.10

60 so to---

'10

~

fAf

--- ----------------- ----------

20 BAf 10 O+-------------...-......----------...-----------------------~-----+

0 so 100 150 200 TIME (SECONDS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT REACTOR PRESSURE VESSEL WATER LEVEL VERSUS TIME, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.11

3 l

0-+-------------------------------------------------~--~~~._J..

0 s 10 ts TIME (SECONDS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT MINIMUM CRITICAL HEAT FLUX RATIO VERSUS TIME FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.12

.- .. .. .- . . .

2500 .. *

--

IL 0

2000*

r CORE REFLOODED i-I!

I!:!

0 CORE SPRAY INITIATED 5u tSOO*

  • ll::

~

1000- -

500 .. -

0 I I I I I I I 0 100 200 900 '100 500 800 ?00 BOO TJHE *CSECrNlSl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME,

-- 1,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS,

.05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6.7.13

I

  • *
  • I I t 2500- ..

--a:

0 u.. 2000-r CORE REFLOODED

..

CORE SPRAY INITIATED

~

c cc ,.

--~ tSOO*

u

~

a:

~

1000- i-500- ,.

0 I I I I I I I 0 100 200 soo 'lOO 500 600 ?00 800 TJHE (SECCHJS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 10,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS,

.05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6.7.14

.

-

.

-

. . . . .

2500 .. .

--

  • u.. 2000-r CORE REFLOODED

-

i:

~

CORE SPRAY INITIATED 0

_,

cc u

~

tSOO- -

cc

~

1000- ..

soo- ...

0 I I I I I I I 0 100 200 900 'lOO 500 600  ?OD 800 TJHE rSECM>Sl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 25,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS,

.05-SQ FT BREAK FIGURE 6. 7.15

~ CORE REFLOODED u: 2000

°-

n. CORE SPRAY INITIATED s::

~

0 5u 1500

~

a:

~

1000 500 0-+----------------------------~----~~--~~------------ 10 0 10 ' 10 I 10.

TJHE f'SECrH>Sl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 1,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.16

2500

+-CORE REFLOODED

&L: 2000

-

~

~

~

CORE SPRAY INITIATED c

5u 1500

~

a:

H:!

1000 500 a10......0----------------------------------------------------_..

10' 10. 10 I TJHE tSECIN>Sl PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 10,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORE SPRAY SYSTEMS, AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6.7.17

2500 r CORE REFLOODED IL

-

  • 11..

2000 '

2:

CORE SPRAY INITIATED

~

0 5u 1500 lt':

u:.

le 1000 500 0-+------------------------------------------------------- 10 0 10 ' 10. 10.

TIHE CSECfNlSJ PHILADILPHIA ILICTRIC COMPANY PIACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWIR STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAPITY ANALYSIS RIPORT PEAK CLAD TEMPERATURE VERSUS TIME, 25,000 MWd/T EXPOSURE, TWO CORESPRAY SYSTEMS,AEC/NRC ASSUMPTIONS, DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6. 7.18

2SOO-

~

l

~ 2000'- \:"'"" l. PESIGN --

8'9S/$ #ICC/DENT

~

~

-

1

~ 1.soo ...

Ll!lllJC llNTe~N'J~Dl4TE - ~GAi(

~

"

~

~

...

Q /000 -

Q

~

._J (J

~ .soo -

~

Q.

0 I I 0 10000 20000 36600 FUEL BUNDLE EXPOS/JR£ - MWD/r PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAPITY ANALYSIS REPORT PEAKING FACTOR STUDY, EFFECT OF EXPOSURE ON MAXIMUM CLADDING TEMPERATURE FOR PEACH BOTTOM UNITS 2 AND 3 PIGURI 6.7.18a

0.001 ~-------------------------------------------------------------....i..---------------

0.06 1.0 10 100 1,000 TIME AFTER ACCIDENT (SECONDS)

POWER GENERATION FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS LOCA ACCIDENT PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT POWER GENERATION FOLLOWING A DESIGN BASIS LOCA FIGURE 6.7.19

1.0----------------..-------......------...-------.------.,-------..,-----.......

0.8

\

\

0.6 \

)-i 8

\

H \

H \

~

>

()I 0.4 0.2 CHANNEL INLET QUALITY 0

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 TIME AFTER ACCIDENT ... (SECONDS)

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION UNITS 2 AND 3 UPDATED FINAL SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT QUALITY VERSUS TIME FOR THE DESIGN BASIS ACCIDENT FIGURE 6. 7 .20