ML11130A119: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/10/2011
| issue date = 05/10/2011
| title = Pressure Vessel Shell-to-Flange Weld Analytical Evaluation
| title = Pressure Vessel Shell-to-Flange Weld Analytical Evaluation
| author name = Murray W R
| author name = Murray W
| author affiliation = Progress Energy Co
| author affiliation = Progress Energy Co
| addressee name = Saba F E
| addressee name = Saba F
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| addressee affiliation = NRC/NRR/DORL
| docket = 05000324
| docket = 05000324

Revision as of 19:33, 10 July 2019

Pressure Vessel Shell-to-Flange Weld Analytical Evaluation
ML11130A119
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 05/10/2011
From: Murray W
Progress Energy Co
To: Farideh Saba
Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
References
Download: ML11130A119 (2)


Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Murray, William R. (Bill) [Bill.Murray2@pgnmail.com]

Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 1:37 PM To: Saba, Farideh

Subject:

RE: Brunswick Unit 2- Pressure Vessel Shell-to-Flange Weld Analytical Evaluation (ME6033)

Thankyou,Farideh,forforwardingthisacceptancereviewconfirmation.BillFrom: Saba, Farideh [1]

Sent: Tuesday, May 10, 2011 1:36 PM To: Murray, William R. (Bill)

Cc: Lingam, Siva

Subject:

Brunswick Unit 2- Pressure Vessel Shell-to-Flange Weld Analytical Evaluation (ME6033) Importance: High Bill, Per LIC-109, the NRC staff completed acceptance review Carolina Power & Light Company request for review and approval of "Pressure Vessel Shell-to-Flange Weld Analytical Evaluation" dated April 13, 2011, for

Brunswick Unit 2. The NRC staff finds this analytical evaluat ion to be acceptable for review in that the submittal reasonably appear to contain sufficient technical information, both in scope and depth, for the NRC staff to complete the detailed technical review and render, in an appropriate time frame, an assessment of the requested action.

The acceptance review may result in some questions that will need to be addressed informally or formally prior to the completion of the staff's final assessment of the analytical evaluation.

Thanks, FaridehE.Saba,P.E.SeniorProjectManagerNRC/ADRO/NRR/DORL301 4151447MailStopO8G9AFarideh.Saba@NRC.GOV Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 23 Mail Envelope Properties (BFC0ADE7ADABE443B24633A73E8D1D441B8A53EAFF)

Subject:

RE: Brunswick Unit 2- Pressure Vessel Shell-to-Flange Weld Analytical Evaluation (ME6033) Sent Date: 5/10/2011 1:36:48 PM Received Date: 5/10/2011 1:36:52 PM From: Murray, William R. (Bill)

Created By: Bill.Murray2@pgnmail.com Recipients: "Saba, Farideh" <Farideh.Saba@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None

Post Office: WN000074.oak.zone1.progress-energy.com Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1311 5/10/2011 1:36:52 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: