ML13003A028

Report No. MPR-3815, Rev. 3, Seismic Walkdown Report in Response to the 50.54(f) Information Request Regarding Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Page C-77 Through Page C-156

ML13003A028
Person / Time
Site:	Peach Bottom
Issue date:	11/16/2012
From:	Schlaseman C S MPR Associates
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Exelon Generation Co
References
RS-12-173 MPR-3815, Rev 3
Download: ML13003A028 (80)

Text

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 20D43 Equip. Class'2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description HPCIAux Lube Oil Pump Starter Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R2-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YO X YXN-I UO N/AU 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YXNEI Un N/A[4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YKND UO N/A[l YE! NO Ut]N/AK ND UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

ý<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn " RR-1 -17." C-77 Sheet 2 of 2 V-: -XT- -% a iA.j , J. S J. LJ.#.J rMA-.p. W. 4, -Equipment Description HPCI Aux Lube Oil Pump Starter 20)Cbitrotanl-sMg&-Cdbi~rts Interaction Effects 7. Are soR targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

~AD 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?UE N/AO Yle NO. UQ N/AD Xý NO UD N/AD YX NO UDr Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YXNE UO Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

NAl/Evaluated by: 6t"~3* JIV q764 Date: I \4 9:714z63Jz

< C-4 A>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3'nrrP..nnn1nr.P.

Nn* RR-19-17.C-78 a))0 z S.o=0 3 cin m CD C).0 to

-' D z oA-~0* 0'33 c m~0 C-5.2 CD=-I.r~3 0 0 0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&Y)

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 20E105 Equip. Class 2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description HPCI Turbine Lube Oil Cooler Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R2-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE N Y NEI U[- N/AD)% NE UD N/AE g NEI UD WAD YE NEI UD xY NEUD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPmqnnnrp.nr.p Mn *RR-19-171 C-81 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment IDNo. 20E105 Equip. Class'2 (21) Tanks or Heat Exchangers (Vertical)

Equipment Description HPCI Turbine Lube Oil Cooler Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from im.pact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

5U!tIbv n~t JO -'rerv teo0 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NO UEI N/AQ YV/NO UD N/AD.Y NO UO N/AO Y)NO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

gIND NUO Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

,-'.Evaluated by:?c~ .0 Date: 2ý1h21 26[7-< C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rTnrrPAnnndPnr'.P Nn

• R.R-1l9-17.1 C-82 S-0 z 3 C.)S -0 0-4 I., m CA

, o~CD~g* 0 C,,~ -u-CD C,, A 0 C N, m 3-o CD m 0 C)l cn Sheet 1 of 2 Status: t N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 20P033, 20P038 &2&se&" iY/d '?pq~zA0 Equip. Class" (05) Horizontal Pumps g qjnjzoll Eauinment Descriotion HPCI Booster PumnPumnm .d T-A='w Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 88 Room, Area R2-13 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results Of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this: checklist for documenting ofher comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y4 NEI N NO UD N/AD YXND UL- N/AD Y;& NO U' N/AO-YR ND UD 2Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >ýPeach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 TnrrP.qnnndPnr.p Nn -

C-85 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 20P033, 20P038 &Equip. Class 1 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description HPCI Booster Pump, Pump, 44.-#Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from inpact by nearby equipment or structures?

I NO SkF-* NEI U-- N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YA NEI UD N/AE .and masonry block walls not likely to collanse pnto the equipment?.fA +o Do 5 ; ne he -40ri4 taNeUD /A 9.. Do attac'hedkes ave adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YXNEI UEI N/AOl 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YNEI UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YWNEND UEi Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: g11-zlloz JI , I_ J Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrP..qnnndPnr'P Nn ' Rq-19-17.1 C-86

-0 w 0-~0 3 0 C, W o 0 (D m t-a 3 CD (C)u C0 5 CA)0-0 0 0,,)O0 M.z oa 0 3)0 m~0 CA)90 Ca, 0 00

-0n~ 10!.0 4'13-o CA 00 Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 20P036 & 20S038 Equip. Class1 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description RCIC Pump_2 & Turbine Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. W- ")i ' I oom, Area R2-14 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

)1ATC9 65 D~ 44:'6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YP4NOJ YXND UEI N/AD YXNO Url N/AD)NC]O UFJ N/AD YZ NEI UI N/AD Y0 N UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrP~nnndPnr-.P Nn

• R.R-19-17.A C-90 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 20P036 & 20S038 Equip. Class1 2 (05) Horizontal Pumps Equipment Description RCIC Pump & Turbine Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to colapse onto the equipment?

Do, terora e ave adequate 4i arvoi dama ge+9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?YX NEI Ut- N/All* NE UEJ N/At]dy41', 5 ýC YjiNO Ut] N/AO 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YvN5N UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YXNI' UtI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) ic/A Evaluated by: Date t: Date: q/(26if Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 ('nrrPmnnnrIPnrn-.

Kn *R5R-19-17" C-91 co 03 3, 3 CD:3.j m m C.0.0)gO

-0 z 0 CA)-~0 0 m.0 C)CD 90-u 0 CIO 00 She t1of2 Status: 9ý N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. __.______

Equip. Class=Equipment Description A PC I T-our6ýn (00 Q~'Location:

Bldg. R0dCL. Floor El. 6!6 Room, Area -I Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?NO Y4NO NEI UO N/AC UE N/AC UC N/AC]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YX NO U" N/AC..(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for whicp an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXNEI UQ 2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.( C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPgnnnri.nrP Nn* RS7--17.C-94 Sheet 2 o0 2 Equipment ID No.. 9tin 7 Equip. Class,2 .e Equipment Description 14P61~ TprwIlie (AK Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX NEI U[-I N/AO YX N[] U[-] N/A-I* NEI U11 N/AD YýR NEIUDI Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NO Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al/A Evaluated by: Date: hh01 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Mn -R5-19-17.T C-95

-0 0 0-z 0 z *0* 0 c m 3o CD m-4

-~~~,~-. 0* 0 C~)~ -u-~ CD L cn-~J Er A=C=N)m.0 C.5.2 CD-I.p M 0 C', 0-4

-.0 0 z -U 0 2.Z m 3a CD C)0 CIO'4 Iof 2 Status(.o N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

2oX 32-. Equip. Class'a2_(_ov)

FrCan..-sorme4i Equipment Description gReae-r At, .-Lcd Cme.x 992,q. imao kyA T'YAns f Location:

Bldg. Floor il. i ,1 Roomn, Area _ _ _ _ _Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

A , Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the oSeismic 'Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

-Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hlardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NX YX NO U- N/AO YK(NO U0 N/AO V[5 NEI U- N/AO YO No uo N/A'YX NEI U!12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPlnnnfdP.nrV-Nn " RR-19-173 C-99 011VEMe-.

UL e-EquipmentIDNo.

a0A0J-L Equip. CIass12 .f) "

Equipment Description Rc.odcyw 4. ju o J0& (i-,,":i'

&V4 ./t kVA R"a- fowcr.Interaction Effects ..7. Are soft targets, free from impact.by nearby equipment or structures?

• Y NEi UI N/Al/V10 '""o '" 4/:: ni,'l "' f '8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NDI U[- N/ADU[- N/ADl YjjZNO UI-D Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment'?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 60 1 in J fr.z l' A883 e..ýp ctd p7rofrr aý ii Evaluated by:-IVQA~~Date: .A I F< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 nrA. Nn ' R.R-12-17.3 0-100 0 3w-.0 0 z c m 30 CD 2)CA, N)

Sheet 1 of 2 S tatus:') N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 20X033 Equip. ClassU (04) Transformers 1o it R iM / n-Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 Room, Area R2-16 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NF2 of the 50%.of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

r 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yo NEI UO N/AE]Y(q NE] UE] N/AEINEI UE] N/AE]YE] NE] UEI N/Alg Y, NEI UE]'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >, Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn ' R.1-19-17.

C-102 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 20X033 Equip. Class"' (04, Transformers Pic q D i n d t Ta r Equipm .ent Description Load Center EP24 Transformer Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y41 NEI UFI N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIA ND and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

.Doartt ced J Mine h ae qa f bii eryo void d -aAge? e Y-we 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y2Q NO UDJ N/AD.U- N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YNN UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y~q NEIDUO p-1 i Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) a z4 1044(;,*'4 2 &504aet 0 tid 6, 61. a Al-1574 7 S -774 -% 6/, W7 4- /D /, [ýe Evaluated by:-4 Date:.~ -~ )*Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rlnrrmnnndrInr.P Nn

• RR-19-17.1

< C-4 >C-103 c, A-0 z *0 CD cn m.0 C.5.(D 5 0 x 0 C,, C,)

-. 0 3* 0~ -g-~ CD'3 *-.-4 E;*5 C M m.0 C 2 CD-4.5 0 0 C,, C,,

-0)0 ?'g 0):3 D c m 30 CD C)C)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 20X133 Equip. Class1 2 (04) Transformers Equipment Description Panel 20Y33 Transformer Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 135 Room, Area T"2-171 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the. Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?-Ao~kwJ -1v block viol) (s5 #5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] N YNEI UE1 N/AD YXNEI TJwNAE XY'NE3 UI" N/AE YO! NEI UE!YX NEI E1 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

4C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrP.nnn~nr.P Non" RR-19-173 C-107 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ii No. LVA Eiqfup. liass'- (04) T ranstormers Equipment Description Panel 20Y33 Transformer Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

NO No 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the quipment?ca O*. M-401) Rv 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YX ND UD N/AD YXNO UlD N/AD\v'oll #$ c~L YXND Ul N/AD YJX' NEI UE 9/174:1-Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yq NEi UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N/A Evaluated by: Date: q//< C-4 A>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrqnnnrIdnr.

Nn

• RR-19-17.1 C-108 D-w~A~~D ~. ~z ~* ~~* C,~CD~. CI, Er 5.C=m 30 CD C.0

-~0~ 3 Z 0 0 3u-~CD 5'm m-3 CD 0-L.0 CA) 2-0-3)C.".0 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:ON U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 20X'0 Equip. Class" 2 (04) Transformers Equipment Description Load Center Transformer E124 Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 Room, Area R2-41 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y'- N[J of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YW NEI U-1 N/A[I 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface NE] Uli] N/ADl oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YEJ N[] U[] N/AE]MIe 1 AacI-&-b ae 5o11,' et! w' f'-e A-Ale'5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YE] NE] UE3 N/Ag (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y) NDI UE]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >*Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Cnrrm'nnndPnrp

-Nn *R-19-17.C-1 12 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 20X&0 Equip. Class'2 (04) Transformers Equipment Description Load Center Transformer E124 Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

7 N[3 UZI N/AEJ 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, W NEI U['] N/A[..and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9, Do attached lines have adequate-flexibility to avoid damage? y1 NE UDI N/A1 Aýe' ct 4* J fIIej. 5att'd d~JIv 1-0Ad 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YtANEI UO Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yi[l NEI UE'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) rI~e-e- x~re 9~ ~ d / ~4~3 d~ f/~4V 4~('-ss Evaluated by: A111123;-Date: 21gI2,-K C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rTnrrP.nnrn1lnrý Nn

• R.R-19-173 C-113

-02 3 z ~o 0 3 2 n m.0 C.5.3 CD-I.5 N, 0 x 0 0

-0 m (D 0 CA)0 XU 0 z 0* 0.c)0:3 Sheet 1 of 2 Status'DN U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Ei n yoN.0 5'0A Equi Equipment ID No. Equip. Classel (14) Distribution Panels Equipment Description 120 VAC Distribution Panel 2C Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 150 Room, Area 12-81 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent.

with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the' 50% for " which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE N,W YX NEI U0I N/ADNEI U- N/A[Yp"NE UE N/All.YO NO uEIN/YNNEIUO Ii.Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equip'mint.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3.nrrP.qnnnr1fnrP Nn " RR-19-173 C-117 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 20Y50 Equip. Class'2 (14) Distribution Panels Equipment Description 120VAC Distribution Panel 2C Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

A) 0,- 5 _p4--IV765 YJI NEI UE1 N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9 ath ln have adequ flexibiityt avoid~ damage Y 3l UI--/ -/A4-1 9. Do attached lines have adequate fexibility to avoid damage? YO1 NE] U[:] N/AD 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YES NEI UE]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YP NO] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 0 C/j A Evaluated by: Date: /; L f a-ft /v/I2<(C-4>-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rCnrrPqnnndPnr.P Nn" RR-19-171 C-118

-w-.0 CD 3 0* 0 S cn"-o C 0

!.0* 0 CD CD'3 -0 m 3o CD C" CD Sheet 1 of 2 Status:&2 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 20Y35 Equip. Class 1 2 (i4) Distribution Panels Equipment Description 120VAC Distribution Panel 2C Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 135 Room, Area R2-20 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?k4 /' M0 ,Vb k--~ pav- t-em/ w Z~~4 ' tj19 YEI 17 YJA NI] UEI N/Al]/k NEI U-] N/AE]U-1 N/AF]5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

Y] N/A (Note: This question only applies if the item is one o1 the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification'is-required.)

• 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yý NEI UD 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rorrP..qnnndPnr.p Nn

• RS-12-173 C-121 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 20Y35 Equip. Class'2 (141 Distribution Panels Equipment Description 120VAC Distribution Panel 2C Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?.A),> 5oAL--YJ NO UE1 N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles. and lighting, YA NEI UE" N/AD and masonry. block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?.:-<D;De 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects? _6r~~ / e Ja, fl' 265703 A~~~,*A-~A Lý;jj&,eAw~

~ie /opo--e4 Y~NO UED N/ADI YD(NC UD1~4A#lpd 44~, , .Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NEI U'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessari)

Evaluated by: Date: /, -Vz Q/Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rlnrrP.nnne1int.P Nn

• RR-19-17.C-122

-~0~co m.0 C.CD CAt

-0 OCD z ~*0 0 3)0~0n c m CD 0 0 031 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:()

N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2AC65 Equip. Class' (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description RX Vessel Level and Pressure Instrument Rack A Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 Room, Area R2-40 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

,01- leI4 5, , 3, 5, lo,.Y~dNO1 YZ NEI UI N/AO-YK NEI UO N/AEU- N/A'YO N[q U- N/AE 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO UF potentially adverse seismic conditions?

eevAý11~e~

4ei 5 e, 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

< C-3 >-Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 C-125 rnrrqnnnrinr.P Nn

• R.R-19-17.1 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2AC65 Equip. Class 1 2 (18) ristruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description RX Vessel Level and Pressure Instrument Rack A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry blo pk walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Pllrke d A-l-w ^Nn lel1 A 1111-9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y14 NEI UO N/AOl N NO U- N/Ao Y NEI UO N/AD X NO UQ Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YX NOI UE adversely, affect the safety functions of the equipment?-cessary) t-' bnAe /WAtLA4 Evaluated by: Date: 23 V 20A.31.2 Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3"lnrrPAnnnrdIn.n.

Nn * .R 17.C-126

u oD ai~0~0 0 m)

Sheet 1 of 2 Status: N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2ADO1 Equip. Class'2 (15) Batteries

& Racks Equipment Description 125VDCBattery2A Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 135 Room, Area T2-70 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchoraze confi uration verification is required.)

, 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

VAýNEI Yq NEI UE N/AUl Yý(NEI UO N/AEl YD NE UO N/AL!YP(NO UI N/AO No. P15 -56(V.YX NO U'12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

ý<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Cnrrp-nnndpnr,-.

Nn

• Rq-19-173 C-128 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2ADO1 Equip. Class1 2 (15) Batteries

& Racks Equipment Description 125VDC Battery 2A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX..No c7(TK4 aC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yd and masonry block walls not likely. to collapse onto the equipment?-t, j iAJ o M -7o1 PtoV. .1 (Po'_k walt '#s 40--1~9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y'X 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NEI U- N/AUl NEI U-1 N/AU NEI UE' N/AUI NEI UEi AN"n 0 1 1 44frý'7 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could NE: UU-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Sk0O~S COS P61 id 27-2-g FITL-~C Zva67 JTT.I<CL71V~

(--AA) j~IL' kC6 10110117 Evaluated by: 7ýkl-1 Date: 'If? /21312< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrmnnnr~nr.,.

Nin

• RR-19-171 C-129 OD-~0 CD* 0-~ 0 0 c m-o 3 C C)-.L S~0>z F ca 0 ('3 ci m 30 CD C)-.L Sheet 1 of 2 Status:@ N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. B2 f Equip. Class" 2 (14) Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125 VDC Distribution Panel A fýý '/ 0-///j Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 150 Room, Area T2-81 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI N;4 NEI UEr N/AEl Y[R NEi UD] N/ADl, YK NEI Ufl N/AE1 YEl NEI UE N/AV'Yf NEI UEi 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrqnnnd1nrP.

NIn PRA-19-17.1 C-132 Sheet 2 of 2 ,;6b o0- " Equipment ID No. -"B2-2 M F /11A Equip. Class 1 2 (14) Distribution Panels Equipment Description 125 VDC Distribution Panel.4--

j)i'M ,1( (/I Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YA NDO U-1 N/AEJ ANO soPA- f"ý8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y4 NO UEJ N/AO 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? WNEI] UI C N/AEl 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YJP1NEI UEJ Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI% NEI Ufl adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 11.11A Fo r QA 6 Evaluated by: Date: qh ~/ Z 91<C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 Nn* RR-19-171 C-133

-o a)0-~0~.3l* 0-0 cn m-o C V 2 CD-4.5 0 01 Equipment ID: 2AD025 I I I Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r nrrP-qnnndPnrPNn R.--17ATA C-135 Sheet 1 of 2 Status:(2 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2AD03 Equip. Class 2 (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Batte Charger 2A Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor E1. 135 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of thig checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

, 10 .D- ilC39b-), Rev,. ,--T" P"" No. Rv 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YXNE1Ut' N/AE]Yq NEI Ut N/A[U YXNO UE! N/AU NON U[- N/A-]YX NEO Ut'2 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3.nrrP..qnnndI~nr. -RS-1?-17.C-136 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2AD03 Equip. Class'2 (16) Battery Chargers and Inverters Equipment Description Battery Charger 2A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

• Y NEI UI N/ACl 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YA NEI UCI N/AEl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?w011 5 ,M1-(Mock wal W,01 4s -,--t V~*~ -irqt/7()1)Rev.

I 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?,a NEI UE1 N/AOl YKNEI UE1 Other Adverse Conditions 1 I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yp NEI UD'-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

._ (Aiy 0r I) " o on " A S Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).i/A Evaluated by:ýj Date: S~9)-q-d .*Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrnPqnrIn.nr,P Nn

• RR 9-1-73 C-137

-0 s >~-.0 m 3 CD E5 C)w

-0D* 0 33 Scn 0 m-0 C.CD Sheet 1 of 2 Status:& N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2AV060 Equip. Class1 2 (09) Fans Equipment Description HPSW Pump Room Supplv Fan A Location:

Bldg. Pump Structure Floor El. 112 Room, Area P/H-6 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?jpqo044A J4~ 5ýVAiI 4tv I 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y NEI UE- N/AO NE Ni U- N/ALl YK NEI UD- N/A[-]YEI NEI E NIAr Y>'NUl UO 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 flnrrPgnnndiNnt M R.R-19-17.

C-140 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2AV060 Equip. Class' (09) Fans Equipment Description HPSWPump Room Supply Fan A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YX'NEI 130 N/AOZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YX( NI] UL- N/AQ and masonry block Jalls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NO. UO N/Al]x)ý N] 130 Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YAR NI] UEI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Nv/A Date: I~ a Evaluated by:-ýJ- -V/ -(\J yl-zý/ -Zol <C4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 CnrrP.qnnndPnr,-

Nn* Rq-19-171 C-141 z *33 m 30 CD 0)C)

-U z S2. o* 0 M TU 0 C m 3 CD 0 C)-5.0 Sheet 1 of 2~Status: U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2BC272- Equip. Class 1 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets Equipment Description-!4Ht Steam Leak DRLe e Cabinet Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 165 Room, Area T2-100 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?/'l~fl!e6

~ 3 c"I,,vW t-3 ~N ,9/ P la , J v ,n "/ I 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?-YE] NC9 Y~iJNEI YSjNEI UEi N/AE.Un N/AE-YNI-I U1-[ N/AO-YEI NE UE' N/A.YNE UE 12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >PeachBottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 rnrrPqnnndPnrn-i Nn

• RR-19-173 C-144 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2BC272 ' Equip. Class" 2 (20) Control Panels & Cabinets 8 Mon i-i Equipment Description -HPE4SteamaLeak Degwe4 Cabinet ,3/t2_ 2-Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YW NO UE] N/AO.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution -systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJq NO UI N/AL]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

~1,~3I ~ 7, L / t/O~AL re~ ~p/o- ~~As 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility.

to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YokNEI UL] N/AE]YPNEI UL]Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y] NE UEJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

/Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: V Date: YP <C-4>Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 r.nrrPqnnnr~nr.P.

Mn " RR-19-171 C-145

-D 0 z o** 0 0 0 c m (D-4.C)

• 0;o -0 1'3 m-o CD CD Sheet 1 of 2 Statusr! N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2BC65 Equip. Class" (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description RX Vessel Level and Pressure Instrument Rack B Location:

Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 165 Room, Area R2-40 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6.. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yo NI YP NEI U- N/AE1 YK NEI UL- N/ArI YK, NEI UI] N/AO-YE! NJr UO N/AIl YO- No UE!I ý-H .ad ,,,,,e ,C'/l 4 1' -(c ce ^,,4 //o/,Ve. ej /'g j a~e.Il & -&Y% .Io zc 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >" Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 C-148 f.nrrd~nnnHinrP..

Nn

• R.-19-17.1 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2BC65 Equip. Class'2 (18) Instruments on Racks / Not on Racks Equipment Description RX Vessel Level and Pressure Instrument Rack B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

C,'A/t~k~

fI~r4- ,VAII' -; cA-- -9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YP1 NO UE- N/ADNEF U[ N/AflNO UO N/AD Yp NO1 U[Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[. NDI UT'I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added. as necessary)

/,I, Z-Evaluated by: Date: / , 3//p-.Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 CnrrP.qnnnrhPnrA.

Nn -RR-19-17.1 C-149

-0C'D 0 z, 0"0'1 4 0 c m.0-o 2 CD 5 w 0 0 C, C,'

Sheet 1 of 2 Status:0 N U Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2BDO1 Equip. Class 1 2 (15) Batteries

& Racks Equipment Description 125VDC 2B Location:

Bldg. Turbine Floor El. 135 Room, Area T2-169 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic, Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and, findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y4"NE]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YJK NEI UD N/AD 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yk NEI U- N/AL oxidation?

4.nl on o'ne ca*4r 6014 4jDcI& 06,0ý OeA 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? NEI U[: N/A[5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YA4Ni] UD1 N/AE](Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.).MP +A('l 4 les OiI$)fA+ýApF evcIuSftcA rl cocl vIVA1. P -9) I' -6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

tK NEI UE]12 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

<C-3 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3"nrrP-nnnr1nr.P .Nn

• RR-19-171 C-151 Sheet 2 of 2 Equipment ID No. 2BDO1 Equip. Class 1 2 (15) Batteries

& Racks.Equipment Description 125VDCBattera 2B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

-/o 4cweb YX NEI UO N/AEl 8. Are overhead.

equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJX NEI UD N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the e uipment? 9.-;W g M. Oj e'.-T'OA: " * "r' ; 0 o d~uo e-Ar rlock r -y 4:. liilttjedj

+sv a t e l t 9. DoI" ]ttdlcleyd ines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? NEI UI- N/AD O 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YXNE UL Other Adverse Conditions.

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y)(ND U]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5Yl~ Wwwrv LOtd ra&Is Evaluated by: -Date:-9 1 (' tZIorz< C-4 >Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Unit 2 MPR-3815, Revision 3 (TnrrP.qnnndP1nrP Nn

• RR-19-17.C-152 03'3 4 m.0 C 2 CD B N)w 0 0 0 2r z. 0* 0 W -U-~CD 0)m C)C)

-w~~o~, -.0~ S. ~~. 0 g* 0~ -u-~ (D'3 --'1 ~5.C N)m 30 CD

~CD z ~3 0 C4 L1 CJ 0 0