|
|
Line 14: |
Line 14: |
| | page count = 15 | | | page count = 15 |
| }} | | }} |
| {{#Wiki_filter:KY/UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001July 5, 1996NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 96-39: ESTIMATES OF DECAY HEAT USING ANS 5.1 DECAYHEAT STANDARD MAY VARY SIGNIFICANTLY | | {{#Wiki_filter:KY/UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY |
| | |
| | COMMISSION |
| | |
| | ===OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION=== |
| | WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 5, 1996 NRC INFORMATION |
| | |
| | NOTICE 96-39: ESTIMATES |
| | |
| | OF DECAY HEAT USING ANS 5.1 DECAY HEAT STANDARD MAY VARY SIGNIFICANTLY |
|
| |
|
| ==Addressees== | | ==Addressees== |
| All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear powerreactors. | | All holders of operating |
| | |
| | licenses or construction |
| | |
| | permits for nuclear power reactors. |
|
| |
|
| ==Purpose== | | ==Purpose== |
| The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this informationnotice to alert addressees to the sensitivity of analytical results to inputparameters used with American Nuclear Society standard 5.1 on decay heat(Reference). It is expected that recipients will review the information forapplicability to their facilities and consider actions, as appropriate, toavoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this informationnotice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or writtenresponse is required.BackgroundAmerican Nuclear Society standard 5.1 (ANS 5.1 standard) for decay heatgeneration in nuclear power plants provides a simplified means of estimatingnuclear fuel cooling requirements that can be readily programmed into computercodes used to predict plant performance. The ANS 5.1 standard models theenergy release from the fission products of U-235, U-238, and Pu-239 using asummation of exponential terms with empirical constants. Corrections areprovided to account for energy release from the decay of U-239 and Np-239, andfor the neutron activation of stable fission products. Although the empiricalconstants are built into the standard, certain data inputs are left to thediscretion of the user. These options permit accounting for differences inpower history, initial fuel enrichment, and neutron flux level. | | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory |
| | |
| | Commission (NRC) is issuing this information |
| | |
| | notice to alert addressees |
| | |
| | to the sensitivity |
| | |
| | of analytical |
| | |
| | results to input parameters |
| | |
| | used with American Nuclear Society standard 5.1 on decay heat (Reference). |
| | |
| | It is expected that recipients |
| | |
| | will review the information |
| | |
| | for applicability |
| | |
| | to their facilities |
| | |
| | and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems. |
| | |
| | However, suggestions |
| | |
| | contained |
| | |
| | in this information |
| | |
| | notice are not NRC requirements; |
| | therefore, no specific action or written response is required.Background |
| | |
| | American Nuclear Society standard 5.1 (ANS 5.1 standard) |
| | for decay heat generation |
| | |
| | in nuclear power plants provides a simplified |
| | |
| | means of estimating |
| | |
| | nuclear fuel cooling requirements |
| | |
| | that can be readily programmed |
| | |
| | into computer codes used to predict plant performance. |
| | |
| | The ANS 5.1 standard models the energy release from the fission products of U-235, U-238, and Pu-239 using a summation |
| | |
| | of exponential |
| | |
| | terms with empirical |
| | |
| | constants. |
| | |
| | Corrections |
| | |
| | are provided to account for energy release from the decay of U-239 and Np-239, and for the neutron activation |
| | |
| | of stable fission products. |
| | |
| | Although the empirical constants |
| | |
| | are built into the standard, certain data inputs are left to the discretion |
| | |
| | of the user. These options permit accounting |
| | |
| | for differences |
| | |
| | in power history, initial fuel enrichment, and neutron flux level.Description |
| | |
| | of Circumstances |
| | |
| | During a review of decay heat estimates |
| | |
| | calculated |
| | |
| | using various codes for the same plant, the staff found that the predicted |
| | |
| | decay heat varied considerably. |
| | |
| | This was unexpected |
| | |
| | because the analyses were made using the 1979 ANS 5.1 standard and were to be used in best-estimate" thermal-hydraulic |
| | |
| | analyses.The staff compared calculations |
| | |
| | of decay heat using MELCOR, TRAC, RELAP, and a vendor code for a pressurized |
| | |
| | water reactor operating |
| | |
| | at 1933 megawatts thermal (MWT). The staff made 3 calculations |
| | |
| | using RELAP but varied certain inputs. These calculations |
| | |
| | appear as RELAP,, RELAP 2 , and RELAP in the following |
| | |
| | tables. The decay heat estimates |
| | |
| | in MWT calculated |
| | |
| | ?or 2 hours PD& IC ';cs 95-o3q 9(.oqoS 9606250199 |
| | 1 O A 0o 161b ussOAf '~'k |
| | |
| | IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 after shutdown of the reactor using the various codes and allowable |
| | |
| | inputs were as follows: MELCOR -20.70 MWT Vendor code -22.15 MWT RELAP 1 -22.02 MWT RELAP 2 -26.13 MWT RELAP 3 -20.82 MWT TRAC -22.02 MWT ORIGEN -20.90 MWT It should be noted that the differences |
| | |
| | in predicted |
| | |
| | decay heat resulted from the parameters |
| | |
| | selected for input and not from the codes themselves. |
| | |
| | The last entry in the table was not calculated |
| | |
| | by the ANS 5.1 standard but was calculated |
| | |
| | by the ORIGEN computer code. ORIGEN does not use empirical |
| | |
| | methods to calculate |
| | |
| | decay heat but tracks the buildup and decay of the individual |
| | |
| | fission products within the reactor core during operation |
| | |
| | and shutdown.ORIGEN also includes the effect of element transmutation |
| | |
| | from neutron capture, both in fissile isotopes and fission products. |
| | |
| | Because ORIGEN is a rigorous calculation |
| | |
| | of all decay heat inputs, it was used in the calculations |
| | |
| | for decay heat in attached Figure 1 and is contrasted |
| | |
| | with attached Figure 2 using decay heat internally |
| | |
| | calculated |
| | |
| | by RELAP to the ANS 5.1 standard.Discussion |
| | |
| | The staff found that the different |
| | |
| | decay heat estimates |
| | |
| | occurred because the ANS 5.1 standard was not fully utilized in the selection |
| | |
| | of inputs. Attached Table 1 shows the various inputs to the codes to estimate decay heat.Attached Table 2 shows the effect of different |
| | |
| | assumptions |
| | |
| | on best estimate calculations |
| | |
| | of decay heat 2 hours after shutdown of the reactor.The variation |
| | |
| | in peak cladding temperatures |
| | |
| | with various predictions |
| | |
| | of decay heat may be seen by comparing |
| | |
| | the attached Figures 1 and 2. These figures are plots of the peak cladding temperatures |
| | |
| | for a hypothetical |
| | |
| | beyond-design-basis |
| | |
| | loss-of-feedwater |
| | |
| | event. For Figure 1, values of decay heat predicted |
| | |
| | by the ORIGEN code were input directly into RELAP. Figure 2 is the same event with the decay heat internally |
| | |
| | calculated |
| | |
| | by RELAP using the ANS 5.1 standard.Input assumptions |
| | |
| | to the standard were those that produced the highest values of decay heat denoted in Table 1 as RELAP 2.The difference |
| | |
| | in predicted |
| | |
| | peak core cladding temperatures (approximately |
| | |
| | 250° K [6300 F]) demonstrates |
| | |
| | the importance |
| | |
| | of carefully |
| | |
| | selecting |
| | |
| | required input parameters |
| | |
| | when using ANS 5.1 because analytical |
| | |
| | results may be significantly |
| | |
| | affected. |
| | |
| | Depending |
| | |
| | on the input parameters |
| | |
| | selected the results may be conservative |
| | |
| | or nonconservative. |
| | |
| | IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please contact one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wljenrc.gov |
| | |
| | J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachments: |
| | 1. Table 1, 'Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979" 2. Table 2, "Relative |
| | |
| | Importance |
| | |
| | of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown" 3. Figure 1, "Peak Core' Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ORIGEN" and Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ANS 5.1" 4. List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices Reference: "American |
| | |
| | National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water American Nuclear Society Standards |
| | |
| | Committee |
| | |
| | Working Group, ANS August 29, 1979.Reactors," 5.1, Approved 44A0eiIII |
| | |
| | Attachment |
| | |
| | 1 IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 Table 1. Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979 l I l l Power l Fissile Codes Actinides |
| | |
| | R-Factor G-Factor Si History Elements Vendor Yes 0.6 Not ANS 1.347 3 Yrs. 3 RELAP 1 No NA MAX NA Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _U 2 3 5 RELAP 2 Yes 1.0 MAX NA Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ ___U 2 3 5 RELAP 3 No NA No NA Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _U 2 3 5 MELCOR Yes 0.526 Yes 0.713 1.6 Yrs. 3 TRAC No NA Yes 1.0 Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __I_ U 2 3 5 Notes: Actinides: |
| | Neutron adding to the total capture by U238 produces U239 which decays into Np239 which also decays, decay heat. Not all the above code inputs included actinide decay.R-factor: |
| | The actinide production |
| | |
| | multiplier. |
| | |
| | The standard states that the value of R shall be supplied and justified |
| | |
| | by the user.G-factor: |
| | A decay heat multiplier |
| | |
| | to account for the effect of neutron capture in fission products. |
| | |
| | The standard provides the option of using a maximum value table for the G-factor or a best estimate equation for the first 10,000 seconds.Si: Fissions per initial fissile atom. Si is a multiplier |
| | |
| | applied to the G-factor equation.Power History: Length of full-power |
| | |
| | operation |
| | |
| | before shutdown.Fissile Elements: |
| | The standard permits decay power to be fractionally |
| | |
| | attributed |
| | |
| | to the fission products of 3 fissile isotopes U235, U238, and Pu239. The vendor input attributed |
| | |
| | the fractional |
| | |
| | fission product power as 0.487 from U235, 0.069 from U238, and 0.443 from U239. The fractional |
| | |
| | fission product power input to MELCOR was 0.647 from U235, 0.0425 from U238, and 0.31 from Pu239. The other code inputs assumed all fission product power came from U235. |
| | |
| | Attachment |
| | |
| | 2* IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 Table 2. Relative Importance |
| | |
| | of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown Complete Set For: Options as InDut and Varied Decay Heat in MWT MELCOR MELCOR assumptions (see Table 1) 20.70______________________________________________________________________________ |
| | Increase R from .526 to .6 21.03 Increase Si from .713 to 1.347 21.13 Operation |
| | |
| | time from 1.6 years to 3 years 21.40 Vendor fissile isotopes 21.12 Vendor heavy element equation 21.86 Vendor code Vendor G-factor equation 22.15-__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ANS 5.1 G-factor and heavy element eqs. 21.12 No actinides |
| | |
| | 18.65 Gmax rather than equation 19.44 Infinite operation |
| | |
| | 20.53 RELAP 1 All fission from U235 22.02 ---------------- |
| | RELAP 2 Add actinides |
| | |
| | with R=1 26.13 RELAP 3 Remove actinides |
| | |
| | and G-factor 20.82 TRAC Include G-factor equation with Si-i 22.02 Note: This table illustrates |
| | |
| | the relative importance |
| | |
| | of the various options contained |
| | |
| | in the 1979 ANS 5.1 standard. |
| | |
| | Starting with the decay heat rate calculated |
| | |
| | by MELCOR using the inputs listed in Table 1, the options were changed in sequence to those used in the vendor computer code. The options were then changed to those used in the RELAP 1 analyses, the RELAP 2 analyses, the RELAP 3 analyses, and the TRAC analyses. |
| | |
| | .i Figure 1 Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | 1400.0 1200.0 2'CD E 0 1000.0 800.0 Attachment |
| | |
| | 3 IN 96-39 July 5, 1996- 12000.0 600.0 L 400.0 -0.0 4000.0 8000.0 Time (s)1400.0 Figure 2 Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Ug 1L&... A& IC C 4 var.qy ntIvat 04 1200.0 1-Infinite Operati All U235 Fissic G=Gmax Actinides |
| | |
| | with I£'0 a E 02 1000.0 800.0 ,n..ulLwu |
| | |
| | U)Y MIND ;.. I on in 1 R=1/600.0 400.0 L 0.C.........I D 4000.0 8000.0 12000.0 Time (s) |
| | Attachment |
| | |
| | 4 IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED NRC INFORMATION |
| | |
| | NOTICES Information |
| | |
| | Date of Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to 96-38 96-37 96-36 96-35 96-34 Results of Steam Generator Tube Examinations |
| | |
| | Inaccurate |
| | |
| | Reactor Water Level Indication |
| | |
| | and Inad-vertent Draindown |
| | |
| | During Shutdown Degradation |
| | |
| | of Cooling Water Systems Due to Icing Failure of Safety Systems on Self-Shielded |
| | |
| | Irradia-tors Because of Inadequate |
| | |
| | Maintenance |
| | |
| | and Training Hydrogen Gas Ignition during Closure Welding of a VSC-24 Multi-Assembly |
| | |
| | Sealed Basket Erroneous |
| | |
| | Data From Defective |
| | |
| | ===Thermocouple=== |
| | Results in a Fire Implementation |
| | |
| | of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) |
| | (6) (ii)(A),"Augmented |
| | |
| | Examination |
| | |
| | of Reactor Vessel" Cross-Tied |
| | |
| | Safety Injec-tion Accumulators |
| | |
| | Inaccuracy |
| | |
| | of Diagnostic |
| | |
| | Equipment |
| | |
| | for Motor-Operated Butterfly |
| | |
| | Valves Requirements |
| | |
| | in 10 CFR Part 21 for Reporting |
| | |
| | and Evaluating |
| | |
| | Software Errors 06/21/96 06/18/96 06/12/96 06/11/96 05/31/96 05/24/96 06/05/96 05/22/96 05/21/96 05/20/96 All holders of OLs or CPs for pressurized |
| | |
| | water reactors All pressurized |
| | |
| | water reactor facilities |
| | |
| | holding an operating |
| | |
| | license or a construction |
| | |
| | permit All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory |
| | |
| | Commission |
| | |
| | irradiator |
| | |
| | licensees |
| | |
| | and vendors All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors All material and fuel cycle licensees |
| | |
| | that monitor tem-perature with thermocouples |
| | |
| | All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors All holders of OLs or CPs for pressurized |
| | |
| | water reactors All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors 96-33 96-32 96-31 96-30 96-29 OL = Operating |
| | |
| | License CP -Construction |
| | |
| | Permit |
| | |
| | IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please contact one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.OrfIoaw Stgned by Brin K. Grimes Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wl |
| | |
| | jnrc.gov J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachments: |
| | 1. Table 1, 'Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979" 2. Table 2, 'Relative |
| | |
| | Importance |
| | |
| | of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown" 3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ORIGEN" and Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ANS 5.1" 4. List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices Reference: "American |
| | |
| | National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water American Nuclear Society Standards |
| | |
| | Committee |
| | |
| | Working Group, ANS August 29, 1979.Reactors," 5.1, Approved*See previous concurrence |
| | |
| | Tech Editor reviewed and concurred |
| | |
| | on 03/19/96 DOCUMENT NAME: 96-39. IN To eceiw a copy of this document, hdMcata In the box: 'C' -Copy wlo attechmentenclosure |
| | |
| | E' -Copy w/attachment/.nclosure |
| | |
| | W -No copy"""7 OFFICE TECH CONTS I C:PECB:DRPM |
| | |
| | I I 1II NAME WLJensen* |
| | AEChaffee* |
| | m lJLBirmingham* |
| | C ,v_, DATE 04/02/96 05/16/96 07/1 /96 1 1 03/19/96 1 [ 1 1 __ |
| | IN 96-xx July xx, 1996 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please contact one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wlj~nrc.gov |
| | |
| | J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4enrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachments: |
| | 1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979" 2. Table 2, "Relative |
| | |
| | Importance |
| | |
| | of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown" 3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ORIGEN" and Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ANS 5.1" 5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices Reference: "American |
| | |
| | National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards |
| | |
| | Committee |
| | |
| | Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*See previous concurrence |
| | |
| | OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | SASG:DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | l D/DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME l WLJensen* |
| | RCaruso* l GMHolahan* |
| | DATE 04/02/96 04/04/96 04/30/96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB |
| | |
| | 1 PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | _ C/PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | AD/DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME B. Calure* JBirmingham* |
| | AEChaffee* |
| | BKGrimes DATE 03/19/96 103/19/96 |
| | 1 05/16/96 1 / /96 OFFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME: G:\JLB\DKAY4.IN |
| | |
| | m,4A |
| | |
| | IN 96-xx June xx, 1996 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please contact one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wljenrc.gov |
| | |
| | J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachments: |
| | 1. Table 1, Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979." 2. Table 2, Relative Importance |
| | |
| | of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown'3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ORIGEN." 4. Figure 2, 'Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ANS 5.1.'5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices Reference: |
| | American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards |
| | |
| | Committee |
| | |
| | Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*Sep nrpvious concurrence |
| | |
| | OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | SASG:DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | D/DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME WLJensen* |
| | RCaruso* GMHolahan* |
| | nATF 0a4/02/96 04/04/96 04/30/96_.-OFFICE TECHED:RPB |
| | |
| | PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | C/PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | AD/DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME B. Calure* JBirmingham* |
| | AEChaffeeX |
| | |
| | BKGrimes DATE 03/19/96 .03/19/96 .05//b/96 1 05/ /96)FFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME: G:\JLb\UKAY4.IN |
| | |
| | mtEA, |
| | K-,-IN 96-xx May xx, 1996 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please contact one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wl |
| | |
| | jnrc.gov J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachments: |
| | 1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979." 2. Table 2, "Relative |
| | |
| | Importance |
| | |
| | of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown'3. Figure 1, *Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ORIGEN." 4. Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ANS 5.1." 5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices Reference: |
| | 'American |
| | |
| | National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards |
| | |
| | Committee |
| | |
| | Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*Sge ntrvinut concurrence |
| | |
| | OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | SASG:DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | D/DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME WLJensen* |
| | RCaruso* GMHolahan* |
| | DATE 4T\1o 04/02/96 04/04/96 04/30/96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB |
| | |
| | 1 PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | CAE A AD/DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME B B. Calure* JBirmingham* |
| | AE a fel BKGrimes DATE l 03/19/96 03/19/96 0 5/14/96 ; 05/ /96-rr .. ---r ... --.~. -t -.gA I JFIHUAL WLUMNI KAM: U: \-JLt1\UA1Uq. |
| | |
| | IN AV0en& |
| | K>-IN 96-xx May xx, 1996 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please conta t one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Dire or Division of Reactor Progra Management |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reacto egulation Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: |
| | W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wlj@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachments: |
| | 1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5 , 1979." 2. Table 2, 'Relative |
| | |
| | Importance |
| | |
| | of Option 7200 Seconds (2 hours) Aft Reactor Shutdown." 3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temper ure Calculated |
| | |
| | by ORIGEN." 4. Figure 2, 'Peak Core Cladding Tegmp ature Calculated |
| | |
| | by ANS 5.1.'5. List of Recently Issued NRC 19o( ation Notices Reference: |
| | 'American |
| | |
| | National Standard fg ecay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Sta d ds Committee |
| | |
| | Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*See previous concu e OFFICE SASG:DA:NRR |
| | |
| | SASG:DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | D/DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME WLJfaen* I RCaruso* GMHolahan* |
| | DATE I 04 2/96 1 04/04/96 I 04/30/96.1. .. .*OFFICE f ECHED:RPB |
| | |
| | PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | C/PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | AD/DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME- / B. Calure* JBirmingham* |
| | AEChaffee |
| | |
| | BKGrimes DATE / 03/19/96 03/19/96 05/ /96 05/ /96 bew Tl Ir-luzT l u .s .. -1 -1 %vV UFFIGJAL UDUMEIN NAME: W \)Lb \UKAY4. 11 &W |
| | |
| | IN 96-xx May xx, 1996 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please contact one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wlj@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachments: |
| | 1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979." 2. Table 2, wRelative |
| | |
| | Importance |
| | |
| | of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown.' |
| | 3. Figure 1, wPeak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ORIGEN.3 4. Figure 2, uPeak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ANS 5.1." 5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices Reference: "American |
| | |
| | National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards |
| | |
| | Committee |
| | |
| | Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.A*See Drevious concurrence |
| | |
| | OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | SASG:DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | D1XaS.a NAME W W ensen RCaruso k M -ahan DATE 04/02/96 04/04/96 i4/ 0/96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB |
| | |
| | PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | C/PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | D/DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME B. Calure* JBirmingham* |
| | AEChaffee |
| | |
| | ===DLCrutchfield=== |
| | DATE 1 03/19/96 03/19/96 1 04/ /96 j 04/ /96 UN ILIAL UL r *:- W..DtuF in WFICIAL UUCUMMN NAM: U: XJLt$UKU>Y4. |
| | |
| | IrN |
| | |
| | IN 96-xx April xx, 1996 This information |
| | |
| | notice requires no specific action or written response. |
| | |
| | If you have any questions |
| | |
| | about the information |
| | |
| | in this notice, please contact one of the technical |
| | |
| | contacts listed below or the appropriate |
| | |
| | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Denni .Crutchfield, Director Division f Reactor Program Management |
| | |
| | ===Office of lear Reactor Regulation=== |
| | Technical |
| | |
| | contacts: |
| | W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wlj~nrc.gov |
| | |
| | J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov |
| | |
| | Attachments: |
| | 1. Table 1, Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979.0 2. Table 2, "Relative |
| | |
| | Importance |
| | |
| | of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown." 3. Figure 1, NPeak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ORIGEN." 4. Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature |
| | |
| | Calculated |
| | |
| | by ANS 5.1." 5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices Reference: |
| | American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards |
| | |
| | Committee |
| | |
| | Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*See previous concurrence |
| | |
| | OFFICE SASG:DSSA!RR |
| | |
| | SASQ: PSSA:NRR D/DSSA:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME jW Jenkeg( RCaJ & GMHolahan DATE I 04/2 /96 I 04/10/96 I 04/ /96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB |
| | |
| | PECB:DhPM:NRR |
| | |
| | C/PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | D/DRPM:NRR |
| | |
| | NAME B. Calure* JBirmingham* |
| | AEChaffee |
| | |
| | ===DLCrutchfield=== |
| | DATE 03/19/96 03/19/96 04/ /96 04/ /96 FFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME: G:\JLB\UKAY4.IN |
| | |
| | 5. List of RecentlySosued |
| | |
| | NRC Information |
| | |
| | Notices Reference: |
| | 1. "American |
| | |
| | National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards |
|
| |
|
| ==Description of Circumstances==
| | Committee |
| During a review of decay heat estimates calculated using various codes for thesame plant, the staff found that the predicted decay heat varied considerably.This was unexpected because the analyses were made using the 1979 ANS 5.1standard and were to be used in best-estimate" thermal-hydraulic analyses.The staff compared calculations of decay heat using MELCOR, TRAC, RELAP, anda vendor code for a pressurized water reactor operating at 1933 megawattsthermal (MWT). The staff made 3 calculations using RELAP but varied certaininputs. These calculations appear as RELAP,, RELAP2, and RELAP in thefollowing tables. The decay heat estimates in MWT calculated ?or 2 hoursPD& IC ';cs 95-o3q 9(.oqoS9606250199 1 O A0o 161b ussOAf '~'k
| |
|
| |
|
| IN 96-39July 5, 1996 after shutdown of the reactor using the various codes and allowable inputswere as follows:MELCOR -20.70 MWTVendor code -22.15 MWTRELAP1 -22.02 MWTRELAP2 -26.13 MWTRELAP3 -20.82 MWTTRAC -22.02 MWTORIGEN -20.90 MWTIt should be noted that the differences in predicted decay heat resulted fromthe parameters selected for input and not from the codes themselves.The last entry in the table was not calculated by the ANS 5.1 standard but wascalculated by the ORIGEN computer code. ORIGEN does not use empirical methodsto calculate decay heat but tracks the buildup and decay of the individualfission products within the reactor core during operation and shutdown.ORIGEN also includes the effect of element transmutation from neutron capture,both in fissile isotopes and fission products. Because ORIGEN is a rigorouscalculation of all decay heat inputs, it was used in the calculations fordecay heat in attached Figure 1 and is contrasted with attached Figure 2 usingdecay heat internally calculated by RELAP to the ANS 5.1 standard.DiscussionThe staff found that the different decay heat estimates occurred because theANS 5.1 standard was not fully utilized in the selection of inputs. AttachedTable 1 shows the various inputs to the codes to estimate decay heat.Attached Table 2 shows the effect of different assumptions on best estimatecalculations of decay heat 2 hours after shutdown of the reactor.The variation in peak cladding temperatures with various predictions of decayheat may be seen by comparing the attached Figures 1 and 2. These figures areplots of the peak cladding temperatures for a hypothetical beyond-design-basisloss-of-feedwater event. For Figure 1, values of decay heat predicted by theORIGEN code were input directly into RELAP. Figure 2 is the same event withthe decay heat internally calculated by RELAP using the ANS 5.1 standard.Input assumptions to the standard were those that produced the highest valuesof decay heat denoted in Table 1 as RELAP2.The difference in predicted peakcore cladding temperatures (approximately 250° K [6300 F]) demonstrates theimportance of carefully selecting required input parameters when using ANS 5.1because analytical results may be significantly affected. Depending on theinput parameters selected the results may be conservative or nonconservative.
| | Working Group ANS 5.1. Approved August 29. 1979.OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR |
|
| |
|
| IN 96-39July 5, 1996 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Ifyou have any questions about the information in this notice, please contactone of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contacts:W. L. Jensen, NRR(301) 415-2856Internet:wljenrc.govJ. L. Birmingham, NRR(301) 415-2829Internet:jlb4@nrc.govAttachments:1. Table 1, 'Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979"2. Table 2, "Relative Importance of Options 7200 Seconds(2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown"3. Figure 1, "Peak Core' Cladding Temperature Calculated by ORIGEN" andFigure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ANS 5.1"4. List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesReference:"American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light WaterAmerican Nuclear Society Standards Committee Working Group, ANSAugust 29, 1979.Reactors,"5.1, Approved44A0eiIII
| | SASG:DSSA:NRR |
|
| |
|
| Attachment 1IN 96-39July 5, 1996 Table 1. Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979l I l l Power l FissileCodes Actinides R-Factor G-Factor Si History ElementsVendor Yes 0.6 Not ANS 1.347 3 Yrs. 3RELAP1 No NA MAX NA Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _U 2 3 5RELAP2 Yes 1.0 MAX NA Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ ___U 2 3 5RELAP3 No NA No NA Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _U 2 3 5MELCOR Yes 0.526 Yes 0.713 1.6 Yrs. 3TRAC No NA Yes 1.0 Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __I_ U 2 3 5Notes:Actinides: Neutronadding to the totalcapture by U238 produces U239 which decays into Np239 which also decays,decay heat. Not all the above code inputs included actinide decay.R-factor: The actinide production multiplier. The standard states that the value of R shallbe supplied and justified by the user.G-factor: A decay heat multiplier to account for the effect of neutron capture in fissionproducts. The standard provides the option of using a maximum value table for the G-factor ora best estimate equation for the first 10,000 seconds.Si: Fissions per initial fissile atom. Si is a multiplier applied to the G-factor equation.Power History: Length of full-power operation before shutdown.Fissile Elements: The standard permits decay power to be fractionally attributed to thefission products of 3 fissile isotopes U235, U238, and Pu239. The vendor input attributed thefractional fission product power as 0.487 from U235, 0.069 from U238, and 0.443 from U239. Thefractional fission product power input to MELCOR was 0.647 from U235, 0.0425 from U238, and0.31 from Pu239. The other code inputs assumed all fission product power came from U235.
| | D/DSSA:NRR |
|
| |
|
| Attachment 2* IN 96-39July 5, 1996 Table 2. Relative Importance of Options7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor ShutdownComplete Set For: Options as InDut and Varied Decay Heat in MWTMELCOR MELCOR assumptions (see Table 1) 20.70______________________________________________________________________________Increase R from .526 to .6 21.03Increase Si from .713 to 1.347 21.13Operation time from 1.6 years to 3 years 21.40Vendor fissile isotopes 21.12Vendor heavy element equation 21.86Vendor code Vendor G-factor equation 22.15-__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ANS 5.1 G-factor and heavy element eqs. 21.12No actinides 18.65Gmax rather than equation 19.44Infinite operation 20.53RELAP1 All fission from U235 22.02 ----------------RELAP2 Add actinides with R=1 26.13RELAP3 Remove actinides and G-factor 20.82TRAC Include G-factor equation with Si-i 22.02Note: This table illustrates the relative importance of the various options contained in the1979 ANS 5.1 standard. Starting with the decay heat rate calculated by MELCOR using the inputslisted in Table 1, the options were changed in sequence to those used in the vendor computercode. The options were then changed to those used in the RELAP1 analyses, the RELAP2 analyses,the RELAP3analyses, and the TRAC analyses.
| | NAME WLJensen RCaruso GMHolahan DATE 03/ /96 03/ /96 03/ /96 03/ /96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB |
|
| |
|
| .iFigure 1 Peak Core Cladding Temperature1400.01200.02'CDE01000.0800.0Attachment 3IN 96-39July 5, 1996- 2000.0600.0 L400.0 -0.04000.0 8000.0Time (s)1400.0Figure 2 Peak Core Cladding TemperatureUg 1L&... A& IC C 4var.qy ntIvat 041200.0 1-Infinite OperatiAll U235 FissicG=GmaxActinides with I£'0aE021000.0800.0,n..ulLwu U)Y MIND ;.. Ionin 1R=1/600.0400.0 L0.C.........ID4000.08000.012000.0Time (s)
| | PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| Attachment 4IN 96-39July 5, 1996 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICESInformation Date ofNotice No. Subject Issuance Issued to96-3896-3796-3696-3596-34Results of Steam GeneratorTube ExaminationsInaccurate Reactor WaterLevel Indication and Inad-vertent Draindown DuringShutdownDegradation of CoolingWater Systems Due to IcingFailure of Safety Systemson Self-Shielded Irradia-tors Because of InadequateMaintenance and TrainingHydrogen Gas Ignitionduring Closure Weldingof a VSC-24 Multi-AssemblySealed BasketErroneous Data FromDefective ThermocoupleResults in a FireImplementation of 10 CFR50.55a(g) (6) (ii)(A),"Augmented Examinationof Reactor Vessel"Cross-Tied Safety Injec-tion AccumulatorsInaccuracy of DiagnosticEquipment for Motor-Operated Butterfly ValvesRequirements in 10 CFRPart 21 for Reporting andEvaluating Software Errors06/21/9606/18/9606/12/9606/11/9605/31/9605/24/9606/05/9605/22/9605/21/9605/20/96All holders of OLs or CPsfor pressurized waterreactorsAll pressurized waterreactor facilities holdingan operating license or aconstruction permitAll holders of OLs or CPsfor nuclear power reactorsAll U.S. Nuclear RegulatoryCommission irradiatorlicensees and vendorsAll holders of OLs or CPsfor nuclear power reactorsAll material and fuel cyclelicensees that monitor tem-perature with thermocouplesAll holders of OLs or CPsfor nuclear power reactorsAll holders of OLs or CPsfor pressurized waterreactorsAll holders of OLs or CPsfor nuclear power reactorsAll holders of OLs or CPsfor nuclear power reactors96-3396-3296-3196-3096-29OL = Operating LicenseCP -Construction Permit
| |
|
| |
|
| IN 96-39July 5, 1996 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Ifyou have any questions about the information in this notice, please contactone of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.OrfIoaw Stgned by Brin K. GrimesBrian K. Grimes, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contacts:W. L. Jensen, NRR(301) 415-2856Internet:wl jnrc.govJ. L. Birmingham, NRR(301) 415-2829Internet:jlb4@nrc.govAttachments:1. Table 1, 'Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979"2. Table 2, 'Relative Importance of Options 7200 Seconds(2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown"3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ORIGEN" andFigure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ANS 5.1"4. List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesReference:"American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light WaterAmerican Nuclear Society Standards Committee Working Group, ANSAugust 29, 1979.Reactors,"5.1, Approved*See previous concurrenceTech Editor reviewed and concurred on 03/19/96DOCUMENT NAME:96-39. INTo eceiw a copy of this document, hdMcata In the box: 'C' -Copy wloattechmentenclosure E' -Copy w/attachment/.nclosure W -No copy"""7 OFFICE TECH CONTS I C:PECB:DRPM I I 1IINAME WLJensen* AEChaffee* mlJLBirmingham* C ,v_,DATE 04/02/96 05/16/96 07/1 /961 1 03/19/96 1 [ 1 1 __
| | C/PECB:DRPM:NRR |
| IN 96-xxJuly xx, 1996 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Ifyou have any questions about the information in this notice, please contactone of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contacts:W. L. Jensen, NRR(301) 415-2856Internet:wlj~nrc.govJ. L. Birmingham, NRR(301) 415-2829Internet:jlb4enrc.govAttachments:1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979"2. Table 2, "Relative Importance of Options 7200 Seconds(2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown"3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ORIGEN" andFigure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ANS 5.1"5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesReference:"American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors,"American Nuclear Society Standards Committee Working Group ANS 5.1, ApprovedAugust 29, 1979.*See previous concurrenceOFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR SASG:DSSA:NRR l D/DSSA:NRRNAME l WLJensen* RCaruso* l GMHolahan*DATE04/02/9604/04/9604/30/96OFFICE TECHED:RPB 1 PECB:DRPM:NRR _ C/PECB:DRPM:NRR AD/DRPM:NRRNAME B. Calure* JBirmingham* AEChaffee* BKGrimesDATE 03/19/96 103/19/96 1 05/16/96 1 / /96OFFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME:G:\JLB\DKAY4.INm,4A
| |
|
| |
|
| IN 96-xxJune xx, 1996 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Ifyou have any questions about the information in this notice, please contactone of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contacts:W. L. Jensen, NRR(301) 415-2856Internet:wljenrc.govJ. L. Birmingham, NRR(301) 415-2829Internet:jlb4@nrc.govAttachments:1. Table 1, Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979."2. Table 2, Relative Importance of Options 7200 Seconds(2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown'3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ORIGEN."4. Figure 2, 'Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ANS 5.1.'5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesReference:American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors,"American Nuclear Society Standards Committee Working Group ANS 5.1, ApprovedAugust 29, 1979.*Sep nrpvious concurrenceOFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR SASG:DSSA:NRR D/DSSA:NRRNAME WLJensen* RCaruso* GMHolahan*nATF0a4/02/9604/04/9604/30/96_.-OFFICE TECHED:RPB PECB:DRPM:NRR C/PECB:DRPM:NRR AD/DRPM:NRRNAME B. Calure* JBirmingham* AEChaffeeX BKGrimesDATE 03/19/96 .03/19/96 .05//b/96 1 05/ /96)FFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME:G:\JLb\UKAY4.INmtEA,
| | D/DRPM:NRR |
| K-,-IN 96-xxMay xx, 1996 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Ifyou have any questions about the information in this notice, please contactone of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contacts:W. L. Jensen, NRR(301) 415-2856Internet:wl jnrc.govJ. L. Birmingham, NRR(301) 415-2829Internet:jlb4@nrc.govAttachments:1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979."2. Table 2, "Relative Importance of Options7200 Seconds (2 hours) After Reactor Shutdown'3. Figure 1, *Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ORIGEN."4. Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ANS 5.1."5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesReference:'American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors,"American Nuclear Society Standards Committee Working Group ANS 5.1, ApprovedAugust 29, 1979.*Sge ntrvinut concurrenceOFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR SASG:DSSA:NRR D/DSSA:NRRNAME WLJensen* RCaruso* GMHolahan*DATE4T\1o04/02/9604/04/9604/30/96OFFICE TECHED:RPB 1 PECB:DRPM:NRR CAE A AD/DRPM:NRRNAME B B. Calure* JBirmingham* AE a fel BKGrimesDATE l 03/19/96 03/19/96 05/14/96 ; 05/ /96-rr .. ---r ... --.~. -t -.gA IJFIHUAL WLUMNI KAM:U: \-JLt1\UA1Uq. INAV0en&
| |
| K>-IN 96-xxMay xx, 1996 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Ifyou have any questions about the information in this notice, please conta tone of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Dire orDivision of Reactor Progra ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reacto egulationTechnical contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR(301) 415-2856Internet:wlj@nrc.govJ. L. Birmingham, NRR(301) 415-2829Internet:jlb4@nrc.govAttachments:1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5 , 1979."2. Table 2, 'Relative Importance of Option7200 Seconds (2 hours) Aft Reactor Shutdown."3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temper ure Calculated by ORIGEN."4. Figure 2, 'Peak Core Cladding Tegmp ature Calculated by ANS 5.1.'5. List of Recently Issued NRC 19o( ation NoticesReference:'American National Standard fg ecay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors,"American Nuclear Society Sta d ds Committee Working Group ANS 5.1, ApprovedAugust 29, 1979.*See previous concu eOFFICE SASG:DA:NRR SASG:DSSA:NRR D/DSSA:NRRNAME WLJfaen* I RCaruso* GMHolahan*DATE I 04 2/96 1 04/04/96 I 04/30/96.1. .. .*OFFICE f ECHED:RPB PECB:DRPM:NRR C/PECB:DRPM:NRR AD/DRPM:NRRNAME- / B. Calure* JBirmingham* AEChaffee BKGrimesDATE / 03/19/96 03/19/96 05/ /96 05/ /96bew Tl Ir-luzT l u .s .. -1 -1 %vVUFFIGJAL UDUMEIN NAME:W \)Lb \UKAY4. 11 &W
| |
|
| |
|
| IN 96-xxMay xx, 1996 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Ifyou have any questions about the information in this notice, please contactone of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting DirectorDivision of Reactor Program ManagementOffice of Nuclear Reactor RegulationTechnical contacts:W. L. Jensen, NRR(301) 415-2856Internet:wlj@nrc.govJ. L. Birmingham, NRR(301) 415-2829Internet:jlb4@nrc.govAttachments:1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979."2. Table 2, wRelative Importance of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) AfterReactor Shutdown.'3. Figure 1, wPeak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ORIGEN.34. Figure 2, uPeak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ANS 5.1."5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesReference:"American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors,"American Nuclear Society Standards Committee Working Group ANS 5.1, ApprovedAugust 29, 1979.A*See Drevious concurrenceOFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR SASG:DSSA:NRR D1XaS.aNAME W W ensen RCaruso k M -ahanDATE04/02/9604/04/96i4/ 0/96OFFICE TECHED:RPB PECB:DRPM:NRR C/PECB:DRPM:NRR D/DRPM:NRRNAME B. Calure* JBirmingham* AEChaffee DLCrutchfieldDATE 1 03/19/96 03/19/96 1 04/ /96 j 04/ /96UN ILIAL UL r *:- W..DtuF inWFICIAL UUCUMMN NAM:U: XJLt$UKU>Y4. IrN
| | NAME JBirmingham |
|
| |
|
| IN 96-xxApril xx, 1996 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. Ifyou have any questions about the information in this notice, please contactone of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office ofNuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Denni .Crutchfield, DirectorDivision f Reactor Program ManagementOffice of lear Reactor RegulationTechnical contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR(301) 415-2856Internet:wlj~nrc.govJ. L. Birmingham, NRR(301) 415-2829Internet:jlb4@nrc.govAttachments:1. Table 1, Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979.02. Table 2, "Relative Importance of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours) AfterReactor Shutdown."3. Figure 1, NPeak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ORIGEN."4. Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature Calculated by ANS 5.1."5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesReference:American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors,"American Nuclear Society Standards Committee Working Group ANS 5.1, ApprovedAugust 29, 1979.*See previous concurrenceOFFICE SASG:DSSA!RR SASQ: PSSA:NRR D/DSSA:NRRNAME jW Jenkeg( RCaJ & GMHolahanDATE I 04/2 /96 I 04/10/96 I 04/ /96OFFICE TECHED:RPB PECB:DhPM:NRR C/PECB:DRPM:NRR D/DRPM:NRRNAME B. Calure* JBirmingham* AEChaffee DLCrutchfieldDATE 03/19/96 03/19/96 04/ /96 04/ /96FFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME:G:\JLB\UKAY4.IN
| | AEChaffee |
|
| |
|
| 5. List of RecentlySosued NRC Information NoticesReference:1. "American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light WaterReactors," American Nuclear Society Standards Committee Working GroupANS 5.1. Approved August 29. 1979.OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR SASG:DSSA:NRR D/DSSA:NRRNAME WLJensen RCaruso GMHolahanDATE 03/ /96 03/ /96 03/ /96 03/ /96OFFICE TECHED:RPB PECB:DRPM:NRR C/PECB:DRPM:NRR D/DRPM:NRRNAME JBirmingham AEChaffee DLCrutchfieldDATE 03//7/96 03/ /96 03/ /96 03/ /96OFFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME: G:\JLB\DECAY HT.JLB
| | ===DLCrutchfield=== |
| | DATE 03//7/96 03/ /96 03/ /96 03/ /96 OFFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME: G:\JLB\DECAY |
|
| |
|
| }} | | HT.JLB}} |
|
| |
|
| {{Information notice-Nav}} | | {{Information notice-Nav}} |
Estimates of Decay Heat Using ANS 5.1 Decay Heat Standard May Vary SignificantlyML031060021 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant ![Entergy icon.png](/w/images/7/79/Entergy_icon.png) |
---|
Issue date: |
07/05/1996 |
---|
From: |
Grimes B K Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
---|
To: |
|
---|
References |
---|
IN-96-039, NUDOCS 9606250199 |
Download: ML031060021 (15) |
|
Similar Documents at Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Three Mile Island, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant |
---|
Category:NRC Information Notice
MONTHYEARInformation Notice 2020-02, Flex Diesel Generator Operational Challenges2020-09-15015 September 2020 Flex Diesel Generator Operational Challenges ML20225A0322020-09-0303 September 2020 NRC Choice Letter to NAC International with Attached Safety Inspection Report, IR 0721015/2020201, February 24-27, 2020 and July 22, 2020, Inspection of NAC International in Norcross, Georgia Information Notice 2012-09, PWROG-16043-NP-A, Revision 2, PWROG Program to Address NRC Information Notice 2012-09: Irradiation Effects on Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Crush Strength for Westinghouse and CE PWR Fuel Designs.2019-11-30030 November 2019 PWROG-16043-NP-A, Revision 2, PWROG Program to Address NRC Information Notice 2012-09: Irradiation Effects on Fuel Assembly Spacer Grid Crush Strength for Westinghouse and CE PWR Fuel Designs. Information Notice 2011-20, NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011)2019-07-24024 July 2019 NRC060 - NRC Information Notice 2011-20: Concrete Degradation by Alkali-Silica Reaction (Nov. 18, 2011) ML19196A2452019-07-15015 July 2019 Public Notice - Sequoyah Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 - Exigent Amendment to Facility Operating License Information Notice 2019-01, Inadequate Evaluation of Temporary Alterations2019-03-12012 March 2019 Inadequate Evaluation of Temporary Alterations ML16028A3082016-04-27027 April 2016 NRC Information Notice; IN 2016-05: Operating Experience Regarding Complications From a Loss of Instrumentation Air Information Notice 2015-05, Inoperability of Auxiliary and Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits on Loss of Main Feedwater Pumps2015-05-12012 May 2015 Inoperability of Auxiliary and Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits on Loss of Main Feedwater Pumps Information Notice 2015-05, Inoperability Of Auxiliary And Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits On Loss Of Main Feedwater Pumps2015-05-12012 May 2015 Inoperability Of Auxiliary And Emergency Feedwater Auto Start Circuits On Loss Of Main Feedwater Pumps Information Notice 2013-20, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143)2013-10-0303 October 2013 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143) Information Notice 2013-20, Official Exhibit - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143)2013-10-0303 October 2013 Official Exhibit - NYS000538-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-20: Steam Generator Channel Head and Tubesheet Degradation (October 3, 2013) (ML13204A143) Information Notice 2013-11, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013)2013-07-0303 July 2013 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013) Information Notice 2013-11, Official Exhibit - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013)2013-07-0303 July 2013 Official Exhibit - NYS000551-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2013-11: Crack-Like Indication at Dents/Dings and in the Freespan Region of Thermally Treated Alloy 600 Steam Generator Tubes (July 3, 2013) Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Contain2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Con2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend and/or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2010-12, Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notic2012-08-17017 August 2012 Intervenors' Fifth Motion to Amend And/Or Supplement Proposed Contention No. 5 (Shield Building Cracking). Appendix VI: NRC FOIA Responses (B-51 Through B-53); Turkey Point Event Report; NRC Information Notice 2010-12: Containment Liner Cor Information Notice 2012-13, Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs and Corrective Actions in the Spent Fuel Pool2012-08-10010 August 2012 Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs and Corrective Actions in the Spent Fuel Pool Information Notice 2012-13, Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs And Corrective Actions In The Spent Fuel Pool2012-08-10010 August 2012 Boraflex Degradation Surveillance Programs And Corrective Actions In The Spent Fuel Pool Information Notice 2012-11, Age Related Capacitor Degradation2012-07-23023 July 2012 Age Related Capacitor Degradation ML12031A0132012-02-0606 February 2012 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Investigation Report No. 2-2010-058, Cpn International, Inc Information Notice 2011-19, Licensee Event Reports Containing Information Pertaining to Defects to Basic Components2011-09-26026 September 2011 Licensee Event Reports Containing Information Pertaining to Defects to Basic Components Information Notice 2011-15, Steel Containment Degradation and Associated License Renewal Aging Management Issues2011-08-0101 August 2011 Steel Containment Degradation and Associated License Renewal Aging Management Issues Information Notice 2011-17, Calculation Methodologies for Operability Determinations of Gas Voids in Nuclear Power Plant Piping2011-07-26026 July 2011 Calculation Methodologies for Operability Determinations of Gas Voids in Nuclear Power Plant Piping Information Notice 2011-13, Official Exhibit - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 Official Exhibit - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-13, Official Exhibit - Nys000329-00-Bd01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (Nrc in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 Official Exhibit - Nys000329-00-Bd01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (Nrc in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-13, OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13)2011-06-29029 June 2011 OFFICIAL EXHIBIT - NYS000329-00-BD01 - NRC Information Notice 2011-13, Control Rod Blade Cracking Resulting in Reduced Design Lifetime (Jun 29, 2011) (NRC in 2011-13) Information Notice 2011-04, IN: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 IN: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2011-04, In: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 In: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2011-04, in: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors2011-02-23023 February 2011 in: Contaminants and Stagnant Conditions Affecting Stress Corrosion Cracking in Stainless Steel Piping in Pressurized Water Reactors Information Notice 2010-26, New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-2010-12-30030 December 2010 New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 Information Notice 2010-26, New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review2010-12-30030 December 2010 New England Coalition'S Motion for Leave to Reply to NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 and Entergy'S Response to the Supplement to Nec'S Petition for Commission Review of LBP-10-19 Information Notice 2010-26, 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-262010-12-21021 December 2010 2010/12/21-NRC Staff'S Objection to Nec'S Notification of Information Notice 2010-26 ML13066A1872009-12-16016 December 2009 Draft NRC Information Notice 2009-xx - Underestimate of Dam Failure Frequency Used in Probabilistic Risk Assessments ML1007804482009-11-23023 November 2009 Email from Peter Bamford, NRR to Pamela Cowan, Exelon on TMI Contamination Control Event Information Notice 2009-11, NSP000059-Revised Prefiled Testimony of Northard/Petersen/Peterson-NRC Information Notice 2009-112009-07-0707 July 2009 NSP000059-Revised Prefiled Testimony of Northard/Petersen/Peterson-NRC Information Notice 2009-11 Information Notice 2009-10, Official Exhibit - NYS000019-00-BD01- NRC Information Notice 2009-10, Transformers Failures - Recent Operating Experience (Jul. 7, 2009) (NRC in 2009-10)2009-07-0707 July 2009 Official Exhibit - NYS000019-00-BD01- NRC Information Notice 2009-10, Transformers Failures - Recent Operating Experience (Jul. 7, 2009) (NRC in 2009-10) Information Notice 2009-09, Improper Flow Controller Settings Renders Injection Systems Inoperable and Surveillance Did Not Identify2009-06-19019 June 2009 Improper Flow Controller Settings Renders Injection Systems Inoperable and Surveillance Did Not Identify Information Notice 2008-12, Reactor Trip Due to Off-Site Power Fluctuation2008-07-0707 July 2008 Reactor Trip Due to Off-Site Power Fluctuation Information Notice 2008-11, Service Water System Degradation at Brunswicksteam Electric Plant Unit 12008-06-18018 June 2008 Service Water System Degradation at Brunswicksteam Electric Plant Unit 1 Information Notice 2008-04, Counterfeit Parts Supplied to Nuclear Power Plants2008-04-0707 April 2008 Counterfeit Parts Supplied to Nuclear Power Plants Information Notice 1991-09, Counterfeiting of Crane Valves2007-09-25025 September 2007 Counterfeiting of Crane Valves Information Notice 2007-28, Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Due to Inadequate Chemistry Controls2007-09-19019 September 2007 Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Due to Inadequate Chemistry Controls Information Notice 2007-29, Temporary Scaffolding Affects Operability of Safety-Related Equipment2007-09-17017 September 2007 Temporary Scaffolding Affects Operability of Safety-Related Equipment Information Notice 2007-14, Loss of Offsite Power and Dual-Unit Trip at Catawba Nuclear Generating Station2007-03-30030 March 2007 Loss of Offsite Power and Dual-Unit Trip at Catawba Nuclear Generating Station Information Notice 2007-06, Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems2007-02-0909 February 2007 Potential Common Cause Vulnerabilities in Essential Service Water Systems Information Notice 2007-05, Vertical Deep Draft Pump Shaft and Coupling Failures2007-02-0909 February 2007 Vertical Deep Draft Pump Shaft and Coupling Failures Information Notice 2006-31, Inadequate Fault Interrupting Rating of Breakers2006-12-26026 December 2006 Inadequate Fault Interrupting Rating of Breakers Information Notice 2006-29, Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves as a Result of Stem Nut Wear2006-12-14014 December 2006 Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves as a Result of Stem Nut Wear Information Notice 2006-29, Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves As a Result of Stem Nut Wear2006-12-14014 December 2006 Potential Common Cause Failure of Motor-operated Valves As a Result of Stem Nut Wear Information Notice 2006-13, E-mail from M. Mclaughlin on NRC, Regarding NRC Information Notice 2006-13: Groundwater Contamination2006-07-13013 July 2006 E-mail from M. Mclaughlin on NRC, Regarding NRC Information Notice 2006-13: Groundwater Contamination 2020-09-03 The following query condition could not be considered due to this wiki's restrictions on query size or depth: <code> [[:Beaver Valley]] OR [[:Millstone]] OR [[:Hatch]] OR [[:Monticello]] OR [[:Calvert Cliffs]] OR [[:Dresden]] OR [[:Davis Besse]] OR [[:Peach Bottom]] OR [[:Browns Ferry]] OR [[:Salem]] OR [[:Oconee]] OR [[:Mcguire]] OR [[:Nine Mile Point]] OR [[:Palisades]] OR [[:Palo Verde]] OR [[:Perry]] OR [[:Indian Point]] OR [[:Fermi]] OR [[:Kewaunee]] OR [[:Catawba]] OR [[:Harris]] OR [[:Wolf Creek]] OR [[:Saint Lucie]] OR [[:Point Beach]] OR [[:Oyster Creek]] OR [[:Watts Bar]] OR [[:Hope Creek]] OR [[:Grand Gulf]] OR [[:Cooper]] OR [[:Sequoyah]] OR [[:Byron]] OR [[:Pilgrim]] OR [[:Arkansas Nuclear]] OR [[:Three Mile Island]] OR [[:Braidwood]] OR [[:Susquehanna]] OR [[:Summer]] OR [[:Prairie Island]] OR [[:Columbia]] OR [[:Seabrook]] OR [[:Brunswick]] OR [[:Surry]] OR [[:Limerick]] OR [[:North Anna]] OR [[:Turkey Point]] OR [[:River Bend]] OR [[:Vermont Yankee]] OR [[:Crystal River]] OR [[:Haddam Neck]] OR [[:Ginna]] OR [[:Diablo Canyon]] OR [[:Callaway]] OR [[:Vogtle]] OR [[:Waterford]] OR [[:Duane Arnold]] OR [[:Farley]] OR [[:Robinson]] OR [[:Clinton]] OR [[:South Texas]] OR [[:San Onofre]] OR [[:Cook]] OR [[:Comanche Peak]] OR [[:Yankee Rowe]] OR [[:Maine Yankee]] OR [[:Quad Cities]] OR [[:Humboldt Bay]] OR [[:La Crosse]] OR [[:Big Rock Point]] OR [[:Rancho Seco]] OR [[:Zion]] OR [[:Midland]] OR [[:Bellefonte]] OR [[:Fort Calhoun]] OR [[:FitzPatrick]] OR [[:McGuire]] OR [[:LaSalle]] OR [[:Fort Saint Vrain]] OR [[:Shoreham]] OR [[:Satsop]] OR [[:Trojan]] OR [[:Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant]] </code>.
[Table view]The following query condition could not be considered due to this wiki's restrictions on query size or depth: <code> [[:Beaver Valley]] OR [[:Millstone]] OR [[:Hatch]] OR [[:Monticello]] OR [[:Calvert Cliffs]] OR [[:Dresden]] OR [[:Davis Besse]] OR [[:Peach Bottom]] OR [[:Browns Ferry]] OR [[:Salem]] OR [[:Oconee]] OR [[:Mcguire]] OR [[:Nine Mile Point]] OR [[:Palisades]] OR [[:Palo Verde]] OR [[:Perry]] OR [[:Indian Point]] OR [[:Fermi]] OR [[:Kewaunee]] OR [[:Catawba]] OR [[:Harris]] OR [[:Wolf Creek]] OR [[:Saint Lucie]] OR [[:Point Beach]] OR [[:Oyster Creek]] OR [[:Watts Bar]] OR [[:Hope Creek]] OR [[:Grand Gulf]] OR [[:Cooper]] OR [[:Sequoyah]] OR [[:Byron]] OR [[:Pilgrim]] OR [[:Arkansas Nuclear]] OR [[:Three Mile Island]] OR [[:Braidwood]] OR [[:Susquehanna]] OR [[:Summer]] OR [[:Prairie Island]] OR [[:Columbia]] OR [[:Seabrook]] OR [[:Brunswick]] OR [[:Surry]] OR [[:Limerick]] OR [[:North Anna]] OR [[:Turkey Point]] OR [[:River Bend]] OR [[:Vermont Yankee]] OR [[:Crystal River]] OR [[:Haddam Neck]] OR [[:Ginna]] OR [[:Diablo Canyon]] OR [[:Callaway]] OR [[:Vogtle]] OR [[:Waterford]] OR [[:Duane Arnold]] OR [[:Farley]] OR [[:Robinson]] OR [[:Clinton]] OR [[:South Texas]] OR [[:San Onofre]] OR [[:Cook]] OR [[:Comanche Peak]] OR [[:Yankee Rowe]] OR [[:Maine Yankee]] OR [[:Quad Cities]] OR [[:Humboldt Bay]] OR [[:La Crosse]] OR [[:Big Rock Point]] OR [[:Rancho Seco]] OR [[:Zion]] OR [[:Midland]] OR [[:Bellefonte]] OR [[:Fort Calhoun]] OR [[:FitzPatrick]] OR [[:McGuire]] OR [[:LaSalle]] OR [[:Fort Saint Vrain]] OR [[:Shoreham]] OR [[:Satsop]] OR [[:Trojan]] OR [[:Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant]] </code>. |
KY/UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY
COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 5, 1996 NRC INFORMATION
NOTICE 96-39: ESTIMATES
OF DECAY HEAT USING ANS 5.1 DECAY HEAT STANDARD MAY VARY SIGNIFICANTLY
Addressees
All holders of operating
licenses or construction
permits for nuclear power reactors.
Purpose
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission (NRC) is issuing this information
notice to alert addressees
to the sensitivity
of analytical
results to input parameters
used with American Nuclear Society standard 5.1 on decay heat (Reference).
It is expected that recipients
will review the information
for applicability
to their facilities
and consider actions, as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.
However, suggestions
contained
in this information
notice are not NRC requirements;
therefore, no specific action or written response is required.Background
American Nuclear Society standard 5.1 (ANS 5.1 standard)
for decay heat generation
in nuclear power plants provides a simplified
means of estimating
nuclear fuel cooling requirements
that can be readily programmed
into computer codes used to predict plant performance.
The ANS 5.1 standard models the energy release from the fission products of U-235, U-238, and Pu-239 using a summation
of exponential
terms with empirical
constants.
Corrections
are provided to account for energy release from the decay of U-239 and Np-239, and for the neutron activation
of stable fission products.
Although the empirical constants
are built into the standard, certain data inputs are left to the discretion
of the user. These options permit accounting
for differences
in power history, initial fuel enrichment, and neutron flux level.Description
of Circumstances
During a review of decay heat estimates
calculated
using various codes for the same plant, the staff found that the predicted
decay heat varied considerably.
This was unexpected
because the analyses were made using the 1979 ANS 5.1 standard and were to be used in best-estimate" thermal-hydraulic
analyses.The staff compared calculations
of decay heat using MELCOR, TRAC, RELAP, and a vendor code for a pressurized
water reactor operating
at 1933 megawatts thermal (MWT). The staff made 3 calculations
using RELAP but varied certain inputs. These calculations
appear as RELAP,, RELAP 2 , and RELAP in the following
tables. The decay heat estimates
in MWT calculated
?or 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> PD& IC ';cs 95-o3q 9(.oqoS 9606250199
1 O A 0o 161b ussOAf '~'k
IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 after shutdown of the reactor using the various codes and allowable
inputs were as follows: MELCOR -20.70 MWT Vendor code -22.15 MWT RELAP 1 -22.02 MWT RELAP 2 -26.13 MWT RELAP 3 -20.82 MWT TRAC -22.02 MWT ORIGEN -20.90 MWT It should be noted that the differences
in predicted
decay heat resulted from the parameters
selected for input and not from the codes themselves.
The last entry in the table was not calculated
by the ANS 5.1 standard but was calculated
by the ORIGEN computer code. ORIGEN does not use empirical
methods to calculate
decay heat but tracks the buildup and decay of the individual
fission products within the reactor core during operation
and shutdown.ORIGEN also includes the effect of element transmutation
from neutron capture, both in fissile isotopes and fission products.
Because ORIGEN is a rigorous calculation
of all decay heat inputs, it was used in the calculations
for decay heat in attached Figure 1 and is contrasted
with attached Figure 2 using decay heat internally
calculated
by RELAP to the ANS 5.1 standard.Discussion
The staff found that the different
decay heat estimates
occurred because the ANS 5.1 standard was not fully utilized in the selection
of inputs. Attached Table 1 shows the various inputs to the codes to estimate decay heat.Attached Table 2 shows the effect of different
assumptions
on best estimate calculations
of decay heat 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> after shutdown of the reactor.The variation
in peak cladding temperatures
with various predictions
of decay heat may be seen by comparing
the attached Figures 1 and 2. These figures are plots of the peak cladding temperatures
for a hypothetical
beyond-design-basis
loss-of-feedwater
event. For Figure 1, values of decay heat predicted
by the ORIGEN code were input directly into RELAP. Figure 2 is the same event with the decay heat internally
calculated
by RELAP using the ANS 5.1 standard.Input assumptions
to the standard were those that produced the highest values of decay heat denoted in Table 1 as RELAP 2.The difference
in predicted
peak core cladding temperatures (approximately
250° K [6300 F]) demonstrates
the importance
of carefully
selecting
required input parameters
when using ANS 5.1 because analytical
results may be significantly
affected.
Depending
on the input parameters
selected the results may be conservative
or nonconservative.
IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please contact one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wljenrc.gov
J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov
Attachments:
1. Table 1, 'Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979" 2. Table 2, "Relative
Importance
of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) After Reactor Shutdown" 3. Figure 1, "Peak Core' Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ORIGEN" and Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ANS 5.1" 4. List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices Reference: "American
National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water American Nuclear Society Standards
Committee
Working Group, ANS August 29, 1979.Reactors," 5.1, Approved 44A0eiIII
Attachment
1 IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 Table 1. Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979 l I l l Power l Fissile Codes Actinides
R-Factor G-Factor Si History Elements Vendor Yes 0.6 Not ANS 1.347 3 Yrs. 3 RELAP 1 No NA MAX NA Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _U 2 3 5 RELAP 2 Yes 1.0 MAX NA Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ ___U 2 3 5 RELAP 3 No NA No NA Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _U 2 3 5 MELCOR Yes 0.526 Yes 0.713 1.6 Yrs. 3 TRAC No NA Yes 1.0 Infinite All_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __I_ U 2 3 5 Notes: Actinides:
Neutron adding to the total capture by U238 produces U239 which decays into Np239 which also decays, decay heat. Not all the above code inputs included actinide decay.R-factor:
The actinide production
multiplier.
The standard states that the value of R shall be supplied and justified
by the user.G-factor:
A decay heat multiplier
to account for the effect of neutron capture in fission products.
The standard provides the option of using a maximum value table for the G-factor or a best estimate equation for the first 10,000 seconds.Si: Fissions per initial fissile atom. Si is a multiplier
applied to the G-factor equation.Power History: Length of full-power
operation
before shutdown.Fissile Elements:
The standard permits decay power to be fractionally
attributed
to the fission products of 3 fissile isotopes U235, U238, and Pu239. The vendor input attributed
the fractional
fission product power as 0.487 from U235, 0.069 from U238, and 0.443 from U239. The fractional
fission product power input to MELCOR was 0.647 from U235, 0.0425 from U238, and 0.31 from Pu239. The other code inputs assumed all fission product power came from U235.
Attachment
2* IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 Table 2. Relative Importance
of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) After Reactor Shutdown Complete Set For: Options as InDut and Varied Decay Heat in MWT MELCOR MELCOR assumptions (see Table 1) 20.70______________________________________________________________________________
Increase R from .526 to .6 21.03 Increase Si from .713 to 1.347 21.13 Operation
time from 1.6 years to 3 years 21.40 Vendor fissile isotopes 21.12 Vendor heavy element equation 21.86 Vendor code Vendor G-factor equation 22.15-__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ANS 5.1 G-factor and heavy element eqs. 21.12 No actinides
18.65 Gmax rather than equation 19.44 Infinite operation
20.53 RELAP 1 All fission from U235 22.02 ----------------
RELAP 2 Add actinides
with R=1 26.13 RELAP 3 Remove actinides
and G-factor 20.82 TRAC Include G-factor equation with Si-i 22.02 Note: This table illustrates
the relative importance
of the various options contained
in the 1979 ANS 5.1 standard.
Starting with the decay heat rate calculated
by MELCOR using the inputs listed in Table 1, the options were changed in sequence to those used in the vendor computer code. The options were then changed to those used in the RELAP 1 analyses, the RELAP 2 analyses, the RELAP 3 analyses, and the TRAC analyses.
.i Figure 1 Peak Core Cladding Temperature
1400.0 1200.0 2'CD E 0 1000.0 800.0 Attachment
3 IN 96-39 July 5, 1996- 12000.0 600.0 L 400.0 -0.0 4000.0 8000.0 Time (s)1400.0 Figure 2 Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Ug 1L&... A& IC C 4 var.qy ntIvat 04 1200.0 1-Infinite Operati All U235 Fissic G=Gmax Actinides
with I£'0 a E 02 1000.0 800.0 ,n..ulLwu
U)Y MIND ;.. I on in 1 R=1/600.0 400.0 L 0.C.........I D 4000.0 8000.0 12000.0 Time (s)
Attachment
4 IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED NRC INFORMATION
NOTICES Information
Date of Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to 96-38 96-37 96-36 96-35 96-34 Results of Steam Generator Tube Examinations
Inaccurate
Reactor Water Level Indication
and Inad-vertent Draindown
During Shutdown Degradation
of Cooling Water Systems Due to Icing Failure of Safety Systems on Self-Shielded
Irradia-tors Because of Inadequate
Maintenance
and Training Hydrogen Gas Ignition during Closure Welding of a VSC-24 Multi-Assembly
Sealed Basket Erroneous
Data From Defective
Thermocouple
Results in a Fire Implementation
of 10 CFR 50.55a(g)
(6) (ii)(A),"Augmented
Examination
of Reactor Vessel" Cross-Tied
Safety Injec-tion Accumulators
Inaccuracy
of Diagnostic
Equipment
for Motor-Operated Butterfly
Valves Requirements
in 10 CFR Part 21 for Reporting
and Evaluating
Software Errors 06/21/96 06/18/96 06/12/96 06/11/96 05/31/96 05/24/96 06/05/96 05/22/96 05/21/96 05/20/96 All holders of OLs or CPs for pressurized
water reactors All pressurized
water reactor facilities
holding an operating
license or a construction
permit All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors All U.S. Nuclear Regulatory
Commission
irradiator
licensees
and vendors All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors All material and fuel cycle licensees
that monitor tem-perature with thermocouples
All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors All holders of OLs or CPs for pressurized
water reactors All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors 96-33 96-32 96-31 96-30 96-29 OL = Operating
License CP -Construction
Permit
IN 96-39 July 5, 1996 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please contact one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.OrfIoaw Stgned by Brin K. Grimes Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wl
jnrc.gov J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov
Attachments:
1. Table 1, 'Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979" 2. Table 2, 'Relative
Importance
of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) After Reactor Shutdown" 3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ORIGEN" and Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ANS 5.1" 4. List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices Reference: "American
National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water American Nuclear Society Standards
Committee
Working Group, ANS August 29, 1979.Reactors," 5.1, Approved*See previous concurrence
Tech Editor reviewed and concurred
on 03/19/96 DOCUMENT NAME: 96-39. IN To eceiw a copy of this document, hdMcata In the box: 'C' -Copy wlo attechmentenclosure
E' -Copy w/attachment/.nclosure
W -No copy"""7 OFFICE TECH CONTS I C:PECB:DRPM
I I 1II NAME WLJensen*
AEChaffee*
m lJLBirmingham*
C ,v_, DATE 04/02/96 05/16/96 07/1 /96 1 1 03/19/96 1 [ 1 1 __
IN 96-xx July xx, 1996 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please contact one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wlj~nrc.gov
J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4enrc.gov
Attachments:
1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979" 2. Table 2, "Relative
Importance
of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) After Reactor Shutdown" 3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ORIGEN" and Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ANS 5.1" 5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices Reference: "American
National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards
Committee
Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*See previous concurrence
OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR
SASG:DSSA:NRR
l D/DSSA:NRR
NAME l WLJensen*
RCaruso* l GMHolahan*
DATE 04/02/96 04/04/96 04/30/96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB
1 PECB:DRPM:NRR
_ C/PECB:DRPM:NRR
AD/DRPM:NRR
NAME B. Calure* JBirmingham*
AEChaffee*
BKGrimes DATE 03/19/96 103/19/96
1 05/16/96 1 / /96 OFFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME: G:\JLB\DKAY4.IN
m,4A
IN 96-xx June xx, 1996 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please contact one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wljenrc.gov
J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov
Attachments:
1. Table 1, Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979." 2. Table 2, Relative Importance
of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) After Reactor Shutdown'3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ORIGEN." 4. Figure 2, 'Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ANS 5.1.'5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices Reference:
American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards
Committee
Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*Sep nrpvious concurrence
OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR
SASG:DSSA:NRR
D/DSSA:NRR
NAME WLJensen*
RCaruso* GMHolahan*
nATF 0a4/02/96 04/04/96 04/30/96_.-OFFICE TECHED:RPB
PECB:DRPM:NRR
C/PECB:DRPM:NRR
AD/DRPM:NRR
NAME B. Calure* JBirmingham*
AEChaffeeX
BKGrimes DATE 03/19/96 .03/19/96 .05//b/96 1 05/ /96)FFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME: G:\JLb\UKAY4.IN
mtEA,
K-,-IN 96-xx May xx, 1996 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please contact one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wl
jnrc.gov J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov
Attachments:
1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979." 2. Table 2, "Relative
Importance
of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) After Reactor Shutdown'3. Figure 1, *Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ORIGEN." 4. Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ANS 5.1." 5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices Reference:
'American
National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards
Committee
Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*Sge ntrvinut concurrence
OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR
SASG:DSSA:NRR
D/DSSA:NRR
NAME WLJensen*
RCaruso* GMHolahan*
DATE 4T\1o 04/02/96 04/04/96 04/30/96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB
1 PECB:DRPM:NRR
CAE A AD/DRPM:NRR
NAME B B. Calure* JBirmingham*
AE a fel BKGrimes DATE l 03/19/96 03/19/96 0 5/14/96 ; 05/ /96-rr .. ---r ... --.~. -t -.gA I JFIHUAL WLUMNI KAM: U: \-JLt1\UA1Uq.
IN AV0en&
K>-IN 96-xx May xx, 1996 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please conta t one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Dire or Division of Reactor Progra Management
Office of Nuclear Reacto egulation Technical
contacts:
W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wlj@nrc.gov
J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov
Attachments:
1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5 , 1979." 2. Table 2, 'Relative
Importance
of Option 7200 Seconds (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) Aft Reactor Shutdown." 3. Figure 1, "Peak Core Cladding Temper ure Calculated
by ORIGEN." 4. Figure 2, 'Peak Core Cladding Tegmp ature Calculated
by ANS 5.1.'5. List of Recently Issued NRC 19o( ation Notices Reference:
'American
National Standard fg ecay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Sta d ds Committee
Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*See previous concu e OFFICE SASG:DA:NRR
SASG:DSSA:NRR
D/DSSA:NRR
NAME WLJfaen* I RCaruso* GMHolahan*
DATE I 04 2/96 1 04/04/96 I 04/30/96.1. .. .*OFFICE f ECHED:RPB
PECB:DRPM:NRR
C/PECB:DRPM:NRR
AD/DRPM:NRR
NAME- / B. Calure* JBirmingham*
AEChaffee
BKGrimes DATE / 03/19/96 03/19/96 05/ /96 05/ /96 bew Tl Ir-luzT l u .s .. -1 -1 %vV UFFIGJAL UDUMEIN NAME: W \)Lb \UKAY4. 11 &W
IN 96-xx May xx, 1996 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please contact one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Brian K. Grimes, Acting Director Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical
contacts: W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wlj@nrc.gov
J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov
Attachments:
1. Table 1, "Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979." 2. Table 2, wRelative
Importance
of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) After Reactor Shutdown.'
3. Figure 1, wPeak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ORIGEN.3 4. Figure 2, uPeak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ANS 5.1." 5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices Reference: "American
National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards
Committee
Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.A*See Drevious concurrence
OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR
SASG:DSSA:NRR
D1XaS.a NAME W W ensen RCaruso k M -ahan DATE 04/02/96 04/04/96 i4/ 0/96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB
PECB:DRPM:NRR
C/PECB:DRPM:NRR
D/DRPM:NRR
NAME B. Calure* JBirmingham*
AEChaffee
DLCrutchfield
DATE 1 03/19/96 03/19/96 1 04/ /96 j 04/ /96 UN ILIAL UL r *:- W..DtuF in WFICIAL UUCUMMN NAM: U: XJLt$UKU>Y4.
IrN
IN 96-xx April xx, 1996 This information
notice requires no specific action or written response.
If you have any questions
about the information
in this notice, please contact one of the technical
contacts listed below or the appropriate
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.Denni .Crutchfield, Director Division f Reactor Program Management
Office of lear Reactor Regulation
Technical
contacts:
W. L. Jensen, NRR (301) 415-2856 Internet:wlj~nrc.gov
J. L. Birmingham, NRR (301) 415-2829 Internet:jlb4@nrc.gov
Attachments:
1. Table 1, Decay Heat Options Using ANS 5.1, 1979.0 2. Table 2, "Relative
Importance
of Options 7200 Seconds (2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />) After Reactor Shutdown." 3. Figure 1, NPeak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ORIGEN." 4. Figure 2, "Peak Core Cladding Temperature
Calculated
by ANS 5.1." 5. List of Recently Issued NRC Information
Notices Reference:
American National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards
Committee
Working Group ANS 5.1, Approved August 29, 1979.*See previous concurrence
OFFICE SASG:DSSA!RR
SASQ: PSSA:NRR D/DSSA:NRR
NAME jW Jenkeg( RCaJ & GMHolahan DATE I 04/2 /96 I 04/10/96 I 04/ /96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB
PECB:DhPM:NRR
C/PECB:DRPM:NRR
D/DRPM:NRR
NAME B. Calure* JBirmingham*
AEChaffee
DLCrutchfield
DATE 03/19/96 03/19/96 04/ /96 04/ /96 FFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME: G:\JLB\UKAY4.IN
5. List of RecentlySosued
NRC Information
Notices Reference:
1. "American
National Standard for Decay Heat Power in Light Water Reactors," American Nuclear Society Standards
Committee
Working Group ANS 5.1. Approved August 29. 1979.OFFICE SASG:DSSA:NRR
SASG:DSSA:NRR
D/DSSA:NRR
NAME WLJensen RCaruso GMHolahan DATE 03/ /96 03/ /96 03/ /96 03/ /96 OFFICE TECHED:RPB
PECB:DRPM:NRR
C/PECB:DRPM:NRR
D/DRPM:NRR
NAME JBirmingham
AEChaffee
DLCrutchfield
DATE 03//7/96 03/ /96 03/ /96 03/ /96 OFFICIAL DOCUMENT NAME: G:\JLB\DECAY
HT.JLB
|
---|
|
list | - Information Notice 1996-01, Potential For High Post-Accident Closed-Cycle Cooling Water Temperatures to Disable Equipment Important to Safety (3 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-01, Potential for High Post-Accident Closed-Cycle Cooling Water Temperatures to Disable Equipment Important to Safety (3 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-02, Inoperability of Power-Operated Relief Valves Masked by Downstream Indications During Testing (5 January 1996, Topic: Stroke time)
- Information Notice 1996-03, Main Steam Safety Valve Setpoint Variation as a Result of Thermal Effects (5 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-03, Main Steam Safety Valve Setpoint Variation As a Result of Thermal Effects (5 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-04, Incident Reporting Requirements for Radiography Licensees (10 January 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-05, Partial Bypass of Shutdown Cooling Flow from Reactor Vessel (18 January 1996, Topic: Reactor Vessel Water Level)
- Information Notice 1996-06, Design & Testing Deficiencies of Tornado Dampers at Nuclear Power Plants (25 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-07, Slow Five Percent Scram Insertion Times Caused by Viton Diaphragms in Scram Solenoid Pilot Valves (26 January 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-08, Thermally Induced Pressure Locking of a High Pressure Coolant Injection Gate Valve (5 February 1996, Topic: Anchor Darling, Cold shutdown justification)
- Information Notice 1996-09, Damage in Foreign Steam Generator Internals (12 February 1996, Topic: Earthquake)
- Information Notice 1996-10, Potential Blockage by Debris of Safety System Piping Which Is Not Used During Normal Operation or Tested During Surveillances (13 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-10, Potential Blockage by Debris of Safety System Piping Which is Not Used During Normal Operation or Tested During Surveillances (13 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-11, Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential For Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations (14 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-11, Ingress of Demineralizer Resins Increases Potential for Stress Corrosion Cracking of Control Rod Drive Mechanism Penetrations (14 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-12, Control Rod Insertion Problems (15 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-13, Potential Containment Leak Paths Through Hydrogen Analysis (26 February 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-14, Degradation of Radwaste Facility Equipment at Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Unit 1 (1 March 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-15, Unexpected Plant Performance During Performance of New Surveillance (8 March 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-16, BWR Operation with Indicated Flow Less than Natural Circulation (14 March 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-17, Reactor Operation Inconsistent with the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (18 March 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-18, Compliance with 10 CFR Part 20 for Airborne Thorium (25 March 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-19, Failure of Tone Alert Radios to Activate When Receiving a Shortened Activation Signal (2 April 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-20, Demonstration of Associated Equipment Compliance with 10 CFR 34.20 (4 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-21, Safety Concerns Related to the Design of the Door Interlock Circuit on Nucletron High-Dose Rate and Pulsed Dose Rate Remote Afterloading Brachytherapy Devices (10 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-22, Improper Equipment Settings Due to Use of Nontemperature-Compensated Test Equipment (11 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-23, Fires in Emergency Diesel Generator Exciters During Operation Following Undetected Fuse Blowing (22 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-24, Preconditioning of Molded-Case Circuit Breakers Before Surveillance Testing (25 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-25, Traversing In-Core Probe Overwithdrawn at Lasalle County Station, Unit 1 (30 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-26, Recent Problems with Overhead Cranes (30 April 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-26, Recent Problems With Overhead Cranes (30 April 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-27, Potential Clogging of High Pressure Safety Injection Throttle Valves During Recirculation (1 May 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-28, Suggested Guidance Relating to Development and Implementation of Corrective Action (1 May 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-29, Requirements in 10 CFR Part 21 for Reporting and Evaluating Software Errors (20 May 1996, Topic: Brachytherapy)
- Information Notice 1996-30, Inaccuracy of Diagnostic Equipment for Motor-Operated Butterfly Valves (21 May 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-31, Cross-Tied Safety Injection Accumulators (22 May 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-32, Implementation of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) (6) (II) (A), Augmented Examination of Reactor Vessel (5 June 1996, Topic: Non-Destructive Examination)
- Information Notice 1996-32, Implementation of 10 CFR 50.55a(g) (6) (ii) (A), Augmented Examination of Reactor Vessel (5 June 1996, Topic: Nondestructive Examination)
- Information Notice 1996-33, Erroneous Data From Defective Thermocouple Results in a Fire (24 May 1996, Topic: Reverse polarity)
- Information Notice 1996-33, Erroneous Data from Defective Thermocouple Results in a Fire (24 May 1996, Topic: Reverse polarity)
- Information Notice 1996-34, Hydrogen Gas Ignition During Closure Welding of a VSC-24 Multi-Assembly Sealed Basket (31 May 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-35, Failure of Safety Systems on Self-Shielded Irradiators Because of Inadequate Maintenance and Training (11 June 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-36, Degradation of Cooling Water Systems Due to Icing (12 June 1996, Topic: High winds, Ultimate heat sink, Frazil ice)
- Information Notice 1996-37, Inaccurate Reactor Water Level Indication and Inadvertent Draindown During Shutdown (18 June 1996, Topic: Reactor Vessel Water Level)
- Information Notice 1996-38, Results of Steam Generator Tube Examinations (21 June 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-39, Estimates of Decay Heat Using ANS 5.1 Decay Heat Standard May Vary Significantly (5 July 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-40, Defciencies in Material Dedication and Procurement Practices and in Audits of Vendors (7 October 1996, Topic: Coatings, Troxler Moisture Density Gauge)
- Information Notice 1996-41, Effects of a Decrease in Feedwater Temperature on Nuclear Instrumentation (26 July 1996)
- Information Notice 1996-42, Unexpected Opening of Multiple Safety Relief Valves (5 August 1996, Topic: Reactor Vessel Water Level)
- Information Notice 1996-43, Failures of General Electric Magne-Blast Circuit Breakers (2 August 1996)
... further results |
---|