Information Notice 1987-29, Recent Safety-Related Incidents at Large Irradiators: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 6
| page count = 6
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:X, vtCAttachment 2IN 89-82December 7, 1989 UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDSWASHINGTON, D. C. 20555June 26, 1987NRC INFORMATION NOTICE NO. 87-29: RECENT SAFETY-RELATED INCIDENTS ATLARGE IRRADIATORS
{{#Wiki_filter:X, v tC Attachment
 
2 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY
 
COMMISSION
 
===OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS===
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 June 26, 1987 NRC INFORMATION
 
NOTICE NO. 87-29: RECENT SAFETY-RELATED
 
INCIDENTS
 
===AT LARGE IRRADIATORS===


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
:All NRC licensees authorized to possess and use sealed sources in largeirradiators.
:
All NRC licensees
 
authorized
 
to possess and use sealed sources in large irradiators.


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
i--This notice is being issued to inform recipients of recent safety-relatedincidents at large irradiators, which could have been prevented by propermanagement aictions and attention to preventative maintenance programs. It:is suggested that recipients review this information and their proceduresand consider actions, if appropriate, to ensure both proper preventativemaintenance programs and proper management actions at their facilities.-However, suggestions contained In this Information Notice do not constituteNRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
i--This notice is being issued to inform recipients
 
of recent safety-related
 
incidents
 
at large irradiators, which could have been prevented
 
by proper management
 
aictions and attention
 
to preventative
 
maintenance
 
programs.
 
It: is suggested
 
that recipients
 
review this information
 
and their procedures
 
and consider actions, if appropriate, to ensure both proper preventative
 
maintenance
 
programs and proper management
 
actions at their facilities.-
However, suggestions
 
contained
 
In this Information
 
===Notice do not constitute===
NRC requirements;  
therefore, no specific action or written response is required.Description
 
of Circumstances:
A description
 
of each of six events is provided in Attachment
 
1. In summary, these events included: o hose failure resulting
 
in a leak, failure to report the incident to NRC, and deliberate
 
cover-up of this incident when NRC tried to investigate, leading to company fines and personnel
 
probation;
o intentional
 
bypass of safety interlocks, resulting
 
in'license
 
suspension
 
and other enforcement
 
actions by NRC;o improper pipe routing and inadequate
 
piping material, which broke and caused partial loss of pool water;o source unable to retract to its fully shielded position, due to a frozen solenoid valve;o a stuck source plaque, due to failure to promptly replace a frayed lift cable; and o a stuck source plaque, due to interference
 
from the product carriers and shroud.8706220303 IN 87-29 June 26, 1987 Discussion:
These incidents
 
illustrate
 
a failure by management
 
to assure that proper safety and maintenance
 
procedures
 
are followed.
 
It is suggested
 
that super-visory personnel, particularly
 
the Radiation
 
Protection
 
===Officer and maintenance===
personnel, be reminded of their responsibilities
 
to assure safe operation
 
at their facilities.
 
The incidents
 
discussed
 
in Attachment
 
1 demonstrate
 
the importance
 
of: 1. prompt reporting
 
of incidents
 
to the NRC, as required by regulations
 
or license conditions
 
2. safety training and periodic retraining
 
of personnel 3. not bypassing
 
interlock
 
systems or other safety systems 4. attention
 
to proper plumbing installation
 
and use of appropriate
 
piping material 5. proper maintenance
 
of cables, carrier systems, and other components
 
that*could prevent radioactive
 
sources from being retracted
 
to a shielded position.No specific actions or written response is required by this Information
 
Notice. If you have any questions
 
about this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator
 
of the appropriate
 
NRC regional office or this office.Richard E. Cunningham, Director Division of Fuel Cycle, Medical, Academic, and Commercial
 
Use Safety Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards
 
Technical
 
Contact: Bruce Carrico, K1SS (301) 427-4280 Attachments:
1. Events That Occurred at Large Irradiator
 
Facilities
 
2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information
 
Notices Attachment
 
2 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 Attachment
 
I IN 87-29 June 26, 1987 EVENTS THAT OCCURRED AT LARGE IRRADIATOR
 
FACILITIES
 
1. While the licensee was attempting
 
to decontaminate
 
pool water because of a leaking source, a hose on a filtration
 
system ruptured.
 
===Contaminated===
pool water was then pumped onto the facility floor and leaked outside into the surrounding
 
soil. The licensee failed to report the incident to NRC, and made deliberate
 
efforts to prevent NRC's discovery
 
of this incident."Subsequently, the licensee was indicted by a Federal Court. *A conviction
 
resulted in a $35,000 fine for the company and two years probation
 
for a management
 
employee.
 
Licensee failure to make required reports prevents the HRC from performing
 
its radiological
 
health and safety function and from making a timely assessment
 
of the nature and severity of an incident.2. A licensee deliberately
 
bypassed the safety interlock
 
systems. The NRC subsequently
 
learned that licensee personnel
 
had willfully
 
violated requirements, and that senior licensee management
 
knew, or should have known, of these violations.
 
When NRC attempted
 
to inspect and investigate
 
these suspected
 
violations, senior licensee management
 
knowingly
 
provided false information
 
to the NRC. Subsequent
 
enforcement
 
action included suspension
 
of the license.3. A water line fractured
 
in the pool circulation
 
system which resulted in the loss of 5 feet of pool water. The line break led to a loss of shielding
 
water because the intake and outlet pipes were misaligned
 
during maintenance.
 
The pipe break appears to have occurred because the pipe was made of polyvinyl
 
chloride, designed for cold water, rather than for the heated water temperatures
 
typical for the irradiator.
 
The piping was replaced with polypropylene
 
pipe.4. A night shift operator noticed that the travel time for the source to reach the fully unshielded
 
position was excessive.
 
===After completing===
the next phase of irradiation, the source would not retract to the fully shielded position, even using emergency
 
equipment.
 
===The operator discovered===
that the solenoid valve, that was supposed to retract the source to a shielded position, was frozen due to weather conditions.
 
The valve was in a room above the irradiator
 
facility.
 
The operator went there and turned on a room heater to thaw out the valve so that it would operate.The operator violated license requirements
 
to (1) notify the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) that the source had not returned to Its shielded position because of the frozen valve, and (2) obtain RSO permission
 
to enter and heat the room housing the valve.5. A licensee had identified
 
a frayed lift cable a few days previously, but instead of immediately
 
replacing
 
the cable, the licensee decided to wait for scheduled
 
maintenance.
 
The cable Jammed and froze the source plaque in a less than fully shielded position.
 
Employees
 
cut the cables and let the source plaque free-fall
 
into the pool. The incident could have been prevented
 
by replacing
 
the frayed cable imuediately, and selecting
 
cable material with fray-resistant
 
qualities.
 
Attachment
 
2 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 6. A source plaque became stuck In the exposed position.
 
Conveyors
 
stopped,'.A :ojirce DOWN 'ight came on, but cell radiation
 
levels remained high.Cable slack data indicated
 
that the plaque was stuck about five and a half feet down from its full-up position.
 
The RSO attempted
 
some raising and lowering maneuvers, but the plaque then stuck in a full-up position.
 
The RSO, able to run the product containers
 
out of the cell, saw some were misaligned
 
on the carrier. The RSO notified a State Inspector, who arrived in the afternoon.
 
It was determined
 
that the plaque cable was off its pulley.The bottom of a splice in the cable was resting on the lip of the tube leading to the cell. After the cable was set on its pulley, the cable was guided through the tube, and the plaque was lowered, until it caught again.--A borrowed radiation-resistant
 
camera arrived the next morning. An adequate view of the plaque was obtained by midnight.
 
Apparently
 
the stationary
 
aluminum shroud between product containers
 
and plaque had been deflected and caught on the plaque frame. The plaque was carefully
 
raised and dropped to break the Jam. On the second try, the plaque broke free and dropped into the pool. Analysis revealed that a product container
 
had probably tipped onto the shroud, causing interference
 
with the plaque.This incident was apparently
 
caused by inadequate
 
design of the shroud.This led to the shroud deforming, which interfered
 
with plaque motion.Inadequate
 
maintenance
 
contributed
 
to the problem. The cable should have been replaced instead of spliced. A few months later, the entire source hoist mechanism
 
failed and had to be replaced.
 
This failure oc-*curred when the source plaque was submerged.
 
Attachment
 
2 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 -2 -
$ I Attachment
 
3 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED NMSS INFORMATION
 
NOTICES Information
 
Date of Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to 89-78 89-60 89-47 89-46 89-37 89-35 89-34 89-25 Failure of Packing Nuts on One-Inch Uranium Hexafluoride
 
Cylinder Valves Maintenance
 
of Teletherapy
 
Units Potential
 
Problems with Worn or Distorted
 
Hose Clamps on Self-Contained
 
Breathing
 
Apparatus Confidentiality
 
of Exercise Scenarios Proposed Amendments
 
to 40 CFR Part 61, Air Emission Standards
 
for Radionuclides
 
Loss and Theft of Unsecured Licensed Material Disposal of Americium Wel1-Logging
 
Sources Unauthorized
 
Transfer of Ownership
 
or Control of Licensed Activities
 
11/22/89 08/18/89 05/18/89 05/11/89 04/04/89 03/30/89 03/30/89 03/07/89 All U.S. NRC licensees authorized
 
to possess and use source material and/or special nuclear material for the heating, emptying, filling, or shipping of uranium hexafluoride
 
in 30- and 48-inch diameter cylinders.
 
All U.S. NRC Medical Teletherapy
 
Licensees.
 
===All holders of operating licenses or construction===
permits for nuclear power reactors and fuel facilities.
 
===All holders of licenses for fuel cycle facilities===
and byproduct
 
material licensees
 
having an approved emergency response plan.All U.S. NRC licensees.
 
All U.S. NRC byproduct, source and special nuclear material licensees.
 
All holders of U.S. NRC specific licenses authorizing
 
well-logging
 
activities.
 
All NRC source, byproduct, and special nuclear material licensees.
 
t .a 4 Attachment
 
4 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 Page 1 of I LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED NRC INFORMATION
 
NOTICES---e --001_____.
 
< _Inrormaliw
 
Notice No.89-59, Supp. I 899C1 89-80 89-79 89-56, Supp. 1 89-78 89-77 89-76 Subject Suppliers
 
of Potentially
 
Misrepresented
 
Fasteners Inadequate
 
Control af Temporary
 
===Modifications===
to Safety-Related
 
Systems Potential
 
for Wdater Hanmre Thermal Stratification, and Steam Sinding in High-Pressure Coolant Injection Piping Degraded Coatings and Corrosion
 
of Steel Containment
 
Vessels Questionable
 
===Certification===
of Material Supplied to the Defense Department
 
by Nuclear Suppliers Failure of Packing Nuts on One-Inch Uranium Hexafluoride
 
===Cylinder Valves Debris in Containment===
Emergency
 
Sumps and Incorrect
 
===Screen Configurations===
Biofouling
 
Agent: Zebra 1Nussel DJAW Of Issuance 12/6/89 12/6/89 12/1/89 12/1/89 11/22/89 Issued to All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All holders of OLs or CPs for LkRs.All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.11/22/89 All NRC licensees authorized
 
to possess and use source material and/or special nuclear material for the heating, emptying, filling, or shipping of uranium hexafluoride
 
In 30-and 48-inch diameter cylinders.
 
11/21/89 All holders of OLs or CPs for PURs.11/21/89 All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.OL
 
* Operating


==Description of Circumstances==
License CP
:A description of each of six events is provided in Attachment 1. In summary,these events included:o hose failure resulting in a leak, failure to report the incident to NRC,and deliberate cover-up of this incident when NRC tried to investigate,leading to company fines and personnel probation;o intentional bypass of safety interlocks, resulting in'license suspensionand other enforcement actions by NRC;o improper pipe routing and inadequate piping material, which broke andcaused partial loss of pool water;o source unable to retract to its fully shielded position, due to a frozensolenoid valve;o a stuck source plaque, due to failure to promptly replace a frayed liftcable; ando a stuck source plaque, due to interference from the product carriers andshroud.8706220303 IN 87-29June 26, 1987 Discussion:These incidents illustrate a failure by management to assure that propersafety and maintenance procedures are followed. It is suggested that super-visory personnel, particularly the Radiation Protection Officer and maintenancepersonnel, be reminded of their responsibilities to assure safe operation attheir facilities. The incidents discussed in Attachment 1 demonstrate theimportance of:1. prompt reporting of incidents to the NRC, as required by regulations orlicense conditions2. safety training and periodic retraining of personnel3. not bypassing interlock systems or other safety systems4. attention to proper plumbing installation and use of appropriate pipingmaterial5. proper maintenance of cables, carrier systems, and other components that*could prevent radioactive sources from being retracted to a shieldedposition.No specific actions or written response is required by this InformationNotice. If you have any questions about this matter, please contact theRegional Administrator of the appropriate NRC regional office or this office.Richard E. Cunningham, DirectorDivision of Fuel Cycle, Medical,Academic, and Commercial Use SafetyOffice of Nuclear Material Safetyand Safeguards


===Technical Contact:===
* Construction
Bruce Carrico, K1SS(301) 427-4280Attachments:1. Events That Occurred at Large Irradiator Facilities2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information NoticesAttachment 2IN 89-82December 7, 1989 Attachment IIN 87-29June 26, 1987EVENTS THAT OCCURRED AT LARGE IRRADIATOR FACILITIES1. While the licensee was attempting to decontaminate pool water because ofa leaking source, a hose on a filtration system ruptured. Contaminatedpool water was then pumped onto the facility floor and leaked outside intothe surrounding soil. The licensee failed to report the incident to NRC,and made deliberate efforts to prevent NRC's discovery of this incident."Subsequently, the licensee was indicted by a Federal Court. *A convictionresulted in a $35,000 fine for the company and two years probation for amanagement employee. Licensee failure to make required reports preventsthe HRC from performing its radiological health and safety function andfrom making a timely assessment of the nature and severity of an incident.2. A licensee deliberately bypassed the safety interlock systems. The NRCsubsequently learned that licensee personnel had willfully violatedrequirements, and that senior licensee management knew, or should haveknown, of these violations. When NRC attempted to inspect and investigatethese suspected violations, senior licensee management knowingly providedfalse information to the NRC. Subsequent enforcement action includedsuspension of the license.3. A water line fractured in the pool circulation system which resulted inthe loss of 5 feet of pool water. The line break led to a loss ofshielding water because the intake and outlet pipes were misalignedduring maintenance. The pipe break appears to have occurred becausethe pipe was made of polyvinyl chloride, designed for cold water, ratherthan for the heated water temperatures typical for the irradiator. Thepiping was replaced with polypropylene pipe.4. A night shift operator noticed that the travel time for the source toreach the fully unshielded position was excessive. After completingthe next phase of irradiation, the source would not retract to the fullyshielded position, even using emergency equipment. The operator discoveredthat the solenoid valve, that was supposed to retract the source to ashielded position, was frozen due to weather conditions. The valve wasin a room above the irradiator facility. The operator went there andturned on a room heater to thaw out the valve so that it would operate.The operator violated license requirements to (1) notify the RadiationSafety Officer (RSO) that the source had not returned to Its shieldedposition because of the frozen valve, and (2) obtain RSO permission toenter and heat the room housing the valve.5. A licensee had identified a frayed lift cable a few days previously, butinstead of immediately replacing the cable, the licensee decided to waitfor scheduled maintenance. The cable Jammed and froze the source plaquein a less than fully shielded position. Employees cut the cables and letthe source plaque free-fall into the pool. The incident could have beenprevented by replacing the frayed cable imuediately, and selecting cablematerial with fray-resistant qualities.Attachment 2IN 89-82December 7, 1989 6. A source plaque became stuck In the exposed position. Conveyors stopped,'.A :ojirce DOWN 'ight came on, but cell radiation levels remained high.Cable slack data indicated that the plaque was stuck about five and a halffeet down from its full-up position. The RSO attempted some raising andlowering maneuvers, but the plaque then stuck in a full-up position. TheRSO, able to run the product containers out of the cell, saw some weremisaligned on the carrier. The RSO notified a State Inspector, who arrivedin the afternoon. It was determined that the plaque cable was off its pulley.The bottom of a splice in the cable was resting on the lip of the tubeleading to the cell. After the cable was set on its pulley, the cable wasguided through the tube, and the plaque was lowered, until it caught again.--A borrowed radiation-resistant camera arrived the next morning. An adequateview of the plaque was obtained by midnight. Apparently the stationaryaluminum shroud between product containers and plaque had been deflectedand caught on the plaque frame. The plaque was carefully raised and droppedto break the Jam. On the second try, the plaque broke free and droppedinto the pool. Analysis revealed that a product container had probablytipped onto the shroud, causing interference with the plaque.This incident was apparently caused by inadequate design of the shroud.This led to the shroud deforming, which interfered with plaque motion.Inadequate maintenance contributed to the problem. The cable shouldhave been replaced instead of spliced. A few months later, the entiresource hoist mechanism failed and had to be replaced. This failure oc-*curred when the source plaque was submerged.Attachment 2IN 89-82December 7, 1989 -2 -
$ IAttachment 3IN 89-82December 7, 1989 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNMSS INFORMATION NOTICESInformation Date ofNotice No. Subject Issuance Issued to89-7889-6089-4789-4689-3789-3589-3489-25Failure of Packing Nuts onOne-Inch Uranium HexafluorideCylinder ValvesMaintenance of TeletherapyUnitsPotential Problems withWorn or Distorted HoseClamps on Self-ContainedBreathing ApparatusConfidentiality ofExercise ScenariosProposed Amendments to 40CFR Part 61, Air EmissionStandards for RadionuclidesLoss and Theft of UnsecuredLicensed MaterialDisposal of AmericiumWel1-Logging SourcesUnauthorized Transfer ofOwnership or Control ofLicensed Activities11/22/8908/18/8905/18/8905/11/8904/04/8903/30/8903/30/8903/07/89All U.S. NRC licenseesauthorized to possessand use source materialand/or special nuclearmaterial for the heating,emptying, filling, orshipping of uraniumhexafluoride in 30- and48-inch diameter cylinders.All U.S. NRC MedicalTeletherapy Licensees.All holders of operatinglicenses or constructionpermits for nuclear powerreactors and fuelfacilities.All holders of licensesfor fuel cycle facilitiesand byproduct materiallicensees having anapproved emergencyresponse plan.All U.S. NRC licensees.All U.S. NRC byproduct,source and specialnuclear material licensees.All holders of U.S. NRCspecific licensesauthorizing well-loggingactivities.All NRC source, byproduct,and special nuclearmaterial licensees.


t .a 4Attachment 4IN 89-82December 7, 1989Page 1 of ILIST OF RECENTLY ISSUEDNRC INFORMATION NOTICES---e --001_____. < _InrormaliwNotice No.89-59,Supp. I899C189-8089-7989-56,Supp. 189-7889-7789-76SubjectSuppliers of PotentiallyMisrepresented FastenersInadequate Control afTemporary Modificationsto Safety-Related SystemsPotential for Wdater HanmreThermal Stratification, andSteam Sinding in High-Pressure Coolant InjectionPipingDegraded Coatings andCorrosion of SteelContainment VesselsQuestionable Certificationof Material Supplied tothe Defense Departmentby Nuclear SuppliersFailure of Packing Nutson One-Inch UraniumHexafluoride CylinderValvesDebris in ContainmentEmergency Sumps andIncorrect ScreenConfigurationsBiofouling Agent: Zebra1NusselDJAW OfIssuance12/6/8912/6/8912/1/8912/1/8911/22/89Issued toAll holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.All holders of OLsor CPs for LkRs.All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.11/22/89 All NRC licenseesauthorized to possessand use source materialand/or special nuclearmaterial for the heating,emptying, filling, orshipping of uraniumhexafluoride In 30-and 48-inch diametercylinders.11/21/89 All holders of OLsor CPs for PURs.11/21/89 All holders of OLsor CPs for nuclearpower reactors.OL
Permit UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY


* Operating LicenseCP
COMMISSION


* Construction PermitUNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONWASHINGTON, D.C. 20555OFFICIAL BUSINESSPENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, 5300PIRST CLASS MAILIPOSTAGE & FEES PAIDUSNACPERMIT No. 0 p-U Sup SvCs -' -. 4A HVCS SVCS SECTOC 205551
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, 5300 PIRST CLASS MAIL IPOSTAGE & FEES PAID USNAC PERMIT No. 0 p-U Sup SvCs -' -. 4 A HVCS SVCS SECT OC 20555 1}}
}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Revision as of 13:15, 31 August 2018

Recent Safety-Related Incidents at Large Irradiators
ML031190114
Person / Time
Issue date: 06/26/1987
From: Cunningham R E
NRC/NMSS/IMNS
To:
References
IN-87-029, NUDOCS 8706220303
Download: ML031190114 (6)


X, v tC Attachment

2 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY AND SAFEGUARDS

WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 June 26, 1987 NRC INFORMATION

NOTICE NO. 87-29: RECENT SAFETY-RELATED

INCIDENTS

AT LARGE IRRADIATORS

Addressees

All NRC licensees

authorized

to possess and use sealed sources in large irradiators.

Purpose

i--This notice is being issued to inform recipients

of recent safety-related

incidents

at large irradiators, which could have been prevented

by proper management

aictions and attention

to preventative

maintenance

programs.

It: is suggested

that recipients

review this information

and their procedures

and consider actions, if appropriate, to ensure both proper preventative

maintenance

programs and proper management

actions at their facilities.-

However, suggestions

contained

In this Information

Notice do not constitute

NRC requirements;

therefore, no specific action or written response is required.Description

of Circumstances:

A description

of each of six events is provided in Attachment

1. In summary, these events included: o hose failure resulting

in a leak, failure to report the incident to NRC, and deliberate

cover-up of this incident when NRC tried to investigate, leading to company fines and personnel

probation;

o intentional

bypass of safety interlocks, resulting

in'license

suspension

and other enforcement

actions by NRC;o improper pipe routing and inadequate

piping material, which broke and caused partial loss of pool water;o source unable to retract to its fully shielded position, due to a frozen solenoid valve;o a stuck source plaque, due to failure to promptly replace a frayed lift cable; and o a stuck source plaque, due to interference

from the product carriers and shroud.8706220303 IN 87-29 June 26, 1987 Discussion:

These incidents

illustrate

a failure by management

to assure that proper safety and maintenance

procedures

are followed.

It is suggested

that super-visory personnel, particularly

the Radiation

Protection

Officer and maintenance

personnel, be reminded of their responsibilities

to assure safe operation

at their facilities.

The incidents

discussed

in Attachment

1 demonstrate

the importance

of: 1. prompt reporting

of incidents

to the NRC, as required by regulations

or license conditions

2. safety training and periodic retraining

of personnel 3. not bypassing

interlock

systems or other safety systems 4. attention

to proper plumbing installation

and use of appropriate

piping material 5. proper maintenance

of cables, carrier systems, and other components

that*could prevent radioactive

sources from being retracted

to a shielded position.No specific actions or written response is required by this Information

Notice. If you have any questions

about this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator

of the appropriate

NRC regional office or this office.Richard E. Cunningham, Director Division of Fuel Cycle, Medical, Academic, and Commercial

Use Safety Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards

Technical

Contact: Bruce Carrico, K1SS (301) 427-4280 Attachments:

1. Events That Occurred at Large Irradiator

Facilities

2. List of Recently Issued NRC Information

Notices Attachment

2 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 Attachment

I IN 87-29 June 26, 1987 EVENTS THAT OCCURRED AT LARGE IRRADIATOR

FACILITIES

1. While the licensee was attempting

to decontaminate

pool water because of a leaking source, a hose on a filtration

system ruptured.

Contaminated

pool water was then pumped onto the facility floor and leaked outside into the surrounding

soil. The licensee failed to report the incident to NRC, and made deliberate

efforts to prevent NRC's discovery

of this incident."Subsequently, the licensee was indicted by a Federal Court. *A conviction

resulted in a $35,000 fine for the company and two years probation

for a management

employee.

Licensee failure to make required reports prevents the HRC from performing

its radiological

health and safety function and from making a timely assessment

of the nature and severity of an incident.2. A licensee deliberately

bypassed the safety interlock

systems. The NRC subsequently

learned that licensee personnel

had willfully

violated requirements, and that senior licensee management

knew, or should have known, of these violations.

When NRC attempted

to inspect and investigate

these suspected

violations, senior licensee management

knowingly

provided false information

to the NRC. Subsequent

enforcement

action included suspension

of the license.3. A water line fractured

in the pool circulation

system which resulted in the loss of 5 feet of pool water. The line break led to a loss of shielding

water because the intake and outlet pipes were misaligned

during maintenance.

The pipe break appears to have occurred because the pipe was made of polyvinyl

chloride, designed for cold water, rather than for the heated water temperatures

typical for the irradiator.

The piping was replaced with polypropylene

pipe.4. A night shift operator noticed that the travel time for the source to reach the fully unshielded

position was excessive.

After completing

the next phase of irradiation, the source would not retract to the fully shielded position, even using emergency

equipment.

The operator discovered

that the solenoid valve, that was supposed to retract the source to a shielded position, was frozen due to weather conditions.

The valve was in a room above the irradiator

facility.

The operator went there and turned on a room heater to thaw out the valve so that it would operate.The operator violated license requirements

to (1) notify the Radiation Safety Officer (RSO) that the source had not returned to Its shielded position because of the frozen valve, and (2) obtain RSO permission

to enter and heat the room housing the valve.5. A licensee had identified

a frayed lift cable a few days previously, but instead of immediately

replacing

the cable, the licensee decided to wait for scheduled

maintenance.

The cable Jammed and froze the source plaque in a less than fully shielded position.

Employees

cut the cables and let the source plaque free-fall

into the pool. The incident could have been prevented

by replacing

the frayed cable imuediately, and selecting

cable material with fray-resistant

qualities.

Attachment

2 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 6. A source plaque became stuck In the exposed position.

Conveyors

stopped,'.A :ojirce DOWN 'ight came on, but cell radiation

levels remained high.Cable slack data indicated

that the plaque was stuck about five and a half feet down from its full-up position.

The RSO attempted

some raising and lowering maneuvers, but the plaque then stuck in a full-up position.

The RSO, able to run the product containers

out of the cell, saw some were misaligned

on the carrier. The RSO notified a State Inspector, who arrived in the afternoon.

It was determined

that the plaque cable was off its pulley.The bottom of a splice in the cable was resting on the lip of the tube leading to the cell. After the cable was set on its pulley, the cable was guided through the tube, and the plaque was lowered, until it caught again.--A borrowed radiation-resistant

camera arrived the next morning. An adequate view of the plaque was obtained by midnight.

Apparently

the stationary

aluminum shroud between product containers

and plaque had been deflected and caught on the plaque frame. The plaque was carefully

raised and dropped to break the Jam. On the second try, the plaque broke free and dropped into the pool. Analysis revealed that a product container

had probably tipped onto the shroud, causing interference

with the plaque.This incident was apparently

caused by inadequate

design of the shroud.This led to the shroud deforming, which interfered

with plaque motion.Inadequate

maintenance

contributed

to the problem. The cable should have been replaced instead of spliced. A few months later, the entire source hoist mechanism

failed and had to be replaced.

This failure oc-*curred when the source plaque was submerged.

Attachment

2 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 -2 -

$ I Attachment

3 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED NMSS INFORMATION

NOTICES Information

Date of Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to 89-78 89-60 89-47 89-46 89-37 89-35 89-34 89-25 Failure of Packing Nuts on One-Inch Uranium Hexafluoride

Cylinder Valves Maintenance

of Teletherapy

Units Potential

Problems with Worn or Distorted

Hose Clamps on Self-Contained

Breathing

Apparatus Confidentiality

of Exercise Scenarios Proposed Amendments

to 40 CFR Part 61, Air Emission Standards

for Radionuclides

Loss and Theft of Unsecured Licensed Material Disposal of Americium Wel1-Logging

Sources Unauthorized

Transfer of Ownership

or Control of Licensed Activities

11/22/89 08/18/89 05/18/89 05/11/89 04/04/89 03/30/89 03/30/89 03/07/89 All U.S. NRC licensees authorized

to possess and use source material and/or special nuclear material for the heating, emptying, filling, or shipping of uranium hexafluoride

in 30- and 48-inch diameter cylinders.

All U.S. NRC Medical Teletherapy

Licensees.

All holders of operating licenses or construction

permits for nuclear power reactors and fuel facilities.

All holders of licenses for fuel cycle facilities

and byproduct

material licensees

having an approved emergency response plan.All U.S. NRC licensees.

All U.S. NRC byproduct, source and special nuclear material licensees.

All holders of U.S. NRC specific licenses authorizing

well-logging

activities.

All NRC source, byproduct, and special nuclear material licensees.

t .a 4 Attachment

4 IN 89-82 December 7, 1989 Page 1 of I LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED NRC INFORMATION

NOTICES---e --001_____.

< _Inrormaliw

Notice No.89-59, Supp. I 899C1 89-80 89-79 89-56, Supp. 1 89-78 89-77 89-76 Subject Suppliers

of Potentially

Misrepresented

Fasteners Inadequate

Control af Temporary

Modifications

to Safety-Related

Systems Potential

for Wdater Hanmre Thermal Stratification, and Steam Sinding in High-Pressure Coolant Injection Piping Degraded Coatings and Corrosion

of Steel Containment

Vessels Questionable

Certification

of Material Supplied to the Defense Department

by Nuclear Suppliers Failure of Packing Nuts on One-Inch Uranium Hexafluoride

Cylinder Valves Debris in Containment

Emergency

Sumps and Incorrect

Screen Configurations

Biofouling

Agent: Zebra 1Nussel DJAW Of Issuance 12/6/89 12/6/89 12/1/89 12/1/89 11/22/89 Issued to All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.All holders of OLs or CPs for LkRs.All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.11/22/89 All NRC licensees authorized

to possess and use source material and/or special nuclear material for the heating, emptying, filling, or shipping of uranium hexafluoride

In 30-and 48-inch diameter cylinders.

11/21/89 All holders of OLs or CPs for PURs.11/21/89 All holders of OLs or CPs for nuclear power reactors.OL

  • Operating

License CP

  • Construction

Permit UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY

COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 OFFICIAL BUSINESS PENALTY FOR PRIVATE USE, 5300 PIRST CLASS MAIL IPOSTAGE & FEES PAID USNAC PERMIT No. 0 p-U Sup SvCs -' -. 4 A HVCS SVCS SECT OC 20555 1