ML17249A371: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 27: Line 27:


sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed RR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technica l review, there may instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed RR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technica l review, there may instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.
Based on the information provided in your request, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately [[estimated NRC review hours::100 hours]] to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of December 20, 2017.
Based on the information provided in your request, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of December 20, 2017.
If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.   
If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.   



Revision as of 18:25, 7 November 2018

2017/09/06 NRR E-mail Capture - Hope Creek Acceptance Review Results - Relief Request to Use a Later Edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Operation and Maintenance Code (MG0124)
ML17249A371
Person / Time
Site: Hope Creek PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 09/06/2017
From: Regner L M
Plant Licensing Branch IV
To: Duke P R
Public Service Enterprise Group
References
MG0124
Download: ML17249A371 (2)


Text

1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Regner, Lisa Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:16 AM To: Paul.Duke@pseg.com Cc: Regner, Lisa

Subject:

NRC Acceptance Review Results: R equest to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124)

Paul, By letter dated August 17, 2017, PSEG Nuclear, the licen see for Hope Creek Nuclear Generating Station, submitted a request for relief to use a later edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Operation and Maintenance (OM) Code that, if approved, would allow the licensee to use the 2012 Edition for the fourth inservice testing interval for Hope Creek. The purpose of this email is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this relief request (RR). The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical re view. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in

sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed RR in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technica l review, there may instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed te chnical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff's detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

Based on the information provided in your request, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 100 hours0.00116 days <br />0.0278 hours <br />1.653439e-4 weeks <br />3.805e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by your requested date of December 20, 2017.

If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors including requests for additional information, or unanticipated addition of scope to the review.

If you have any question, please contact me, Lisa Regner, at Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov or 301-415-1906.

Lisa M. Regner Senior Project Manager Branch 4, Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 3713 Mail Envelope Properties (1fff372df3e5400883303818745b9314)

Subject:

NRC Acceptance Review Results: Request to Use Later ASME OM Code (MG0124) Sent Date: 9/6/2017 11:15:44 AM Received Date: 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM From: Regner, Lisa Created By: Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov Recipients: "Regner, Lisa" <Lisa.Regner@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None "Paul.Duke@pseg.com" <Paul.Duke@pseg.com> Tracking Status: None

Post Office: HQPWMSMRS01.nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2931 9/6/2017 11:15:45 AM

Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received: