ML112760601

FEMA Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, MS-1 Final Exercise Report, Exercise Date - July 20, 2011

ML112760601
Person / Time
Site:	Cook
Issue date:	09/20/2011
From:	Velasquez A US Dept of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency
To:	Gibney L, Satorius M A Region 3 Administrator
Cecere, Bethanny NSIR/DPR 415-6754
References
Download: ML112760601 (40)

Text

D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Drill Date - July 20, 2011 Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program After Action Report/

Improvement Plan Published August 31, 2011 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

This page is intentionally blank.

D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant After Action Report/Improvement Plan Published August 31, 2011 Contents Executive Summary 3 Section 1: Exercise Overview 8 1.1 Exercise Details 8 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership 8 1.3 Participating Organizations 9 Section 2: Exercise Design Summary 11 2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design 11 2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities 11 2.3 Scenario Summary 11 Section 3: Analysis of Capabilities 12 3.1 Drill Evaluation and Results 12 3.2 Summary Results of Drill Evaluation 12 3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 15 3.3.1 Michigan Jurisdictions 15 3.3.1.1 State of Michigan - Lakeland Regional Medical Center - Medical Service - Transportation - MDEQ Representative 15 3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions 16 3.3.2.1 Berrien County - Lakeland Community Hospital -

Medical Service - Facility 16 Section 4: Conclusion 17 Appendix A: Drill Evaluators and Team Leaders 18 Appendix B: Acronyms and Abbreviations 19 Appendix C: Exercise Plan 21 1 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

This page is intentionally blank.

2 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

On July 20, 2011, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's (DHS) Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Region V, evaluated a Medical Services Drill in the 10-mile plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone (EPZ) around the D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant.

The purpose of the Medical Services Drill was to assess the ability of offsite agencies to respond to a medical emergency involving a potentially radiologically contaminated member of the public. The Medical Services Drill was held in accordance with DHS/FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans (RERPS). DHS/FEMA wishes to acknowledge the efforts of the many people from the Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, Berrien County Sheriff's Department, Medic 1 Ambulance, and Lakeland Community Hospital in Niles, Michigan, who participated in this Medical Services Drill. Protecting the public health and safety is the full-time job of some of the exercise participants and an additional assigned responsibility for others. Still others have willingly sought this responsibility by volunteering to provide vital emergency services to their communities.

Cooperation and teamwork on the part of all participants was evident during this Medical Services Drill.

The following criteria, which are part of the six Exercise Evaluation Areas described in Federal Register notice [67 FR 20580-20602], April 2002, which amends the FEMA REP-14, Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise Manual, were evaluated during this Medical Services Drill.

Criterion 1.d.1 - At least two communication systems are available, at least one operates properly, and communication links are established and maintained with appropriate locations.

Communications capabilities are managed in support of emergency operations.

Criterion 1.e.1 - Equipment, maps, displays, dosimetry, potassium iodide (KI), and other supplies are sufficient to support emergency operations.

3 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

Criterion 3.a.1 - The OROs issue appropriate dosimetry and procedures, and manage radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans and procedures. Emergency workers periodically and at the end of each mission read their dosimeters and record the readings on the appropriate record or chart.

Criterion 6.d.1: Facility/ORO has the appropriate space, adequate resources, and trained personnel to provide transport, monitoring, decontamination, and medical services to contaminated injured individuals.

The State and local organizations demonstrated knowledge of and adequately implemented organizational emergency response plans and procedures.

There were no Deficiencies identified as a result of this drill. There were no Areas Requiring Correction Action (ARCAs) identified during this drill. There were no previous Deficiencies or ARCAs to be corrected during this drill.

INTRODUCTION - EXERCISE BASIS On December 7, 1979, the President directed FEMA to assume the lead responsibility for all offsite nuclear emergency planning and response. DHS/FEMA's activities are conducted pursuant to Title 44 of the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Parts 350 "Review and Approval of State and Local Radiological Emergency Plans and Preparedness", 351 "Radiological Emergency Planning and Preparedness" and 352 "Commercial Nuclear Power Plants:

Emergency Preparedness Planning" (Commonly referred to as 44 CFR 350 through 352). These regulations are a key element in the Radiological Emergency Preparedness (REP) Program that was established following the Three Mile Island Nuclear Station accident in March 1979.

FEMA Regulation 44 CFR 350 establishes the policies and procedures for DHS/FEMA's initial and continued approval of State and local governments' radiological emergency planning and preparedness for commercial nuclear power plants. This approval is contingent, in part, on State and local governments' participation in joint exercises with licensees.

DHS/FEMA's responsibilities in radiological emergency planning for fixed nuclear facilities include the following:

4 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

• Taking the lead in offsite emergency planning and in the review and evaluation of RERPs and procedures developed by State and local governments;

• Determining whether such plans and procedures can be implemented on the basis of observation and evaluation of exercises of the plans and procedures conducted by State and local governments;

• Responding to requests by the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding between the NRC and FEMA dated June 17, 1993 (Federal Register, Vol. 58, No. 176, September 14, 1993); and

• Coordinating the activities of Federal agencies with responsibilities in the radiological emergency planning process:

- U.S. Department of Agriculture;- U.S. Department of Commerce;- U.S. Department of Energy;- U.S. Department of Health and Human Services;- U.S. Department of the Interior;- U.S. Department of Transportation;- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency;- U.S. Food and Drug Administration; and- U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

Representatives of these agencies serve on the DHS/FEMA Region V Regional Assistance Committee (RAC), which is chaired by DHS/FEMA.

Formal submission of the RERPs for the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant to FEMA Region V by the State of Michigan and involved local jurisdictions occurred on January 23, 1986. Formal approval of these RERPs was granted by FEMA to the State of Michigan on June 15, 1987, under 44 CFR 350.

A REP Medical Services (MS-1) Drill was conducted in the 10-mile EPZ around the D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant on July 20, 2011, by DHS/FEMA Region V, to assess the capabilities of State and local emergency preparedness organizations in implementing their RERPs and procedures to 5 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

protect the public health and safety during a radiological emergency involving the D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant. The purpose of this exercise report is to present the exercise results and findings on the performance of the off-site response organizations (ORO) during a simulated radiological emergency.

The findings presented in this AAR/IP are based on the evaluations of the Federal evaluation team, with final determinations made by the DHS/FEMA Region V RAC Chairperson, and approved by the DHS/FEMA Headquarters.

The criteria utilized in the FEMA evaluation process are contained in:

• NUREG-0654/FEMA-REP-1, Rev. 1, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants," November 1980;

• FEMA-REP-14, "Radiological Emergency Preparedness Exercise Manual," September 1991; and

• FEMA "Radiological Emergency Preparedness: Exercise Evaluation Methodology; Notice" as published in the Federal Register Notice, Vol. 67, No. 80, dated April 25, 2002.

Section 1 of this report, entitled "Exercise Overview", presents information pertaining to the team that planned and coordinated the exercise. This section also provides listing of all participating jurisdictions and functional entities that were evaluated.

Section 2 of this report, entitled "Exercise Design Summary", contains the purpose and design of the exercise, a description of the plume pathway EPZ and presents basic information and data relevant to the exercise scenario.

Section 3 of this report, entitled "Analysis of Capabilities," presents detailed information on the demonstration of applicable exercise criteria at each jurisdiction or functional entity evaluated in a jurisdiction-based, issues-only format. This section also contains:

(1) descriptions of all Deficiencies and ARCAs (if any) assessed during this exercise, recommended corrective actions, and the State and local governments' schedule of corrective 6 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

actions, if applicable, for each identified exercise issue; and (2) descriptions of unresolved ARCAs assessed during previous exercises and the status of the OROs' efforts to resolve them.

Section 4 of this report, entitled "Conclusion" presents the DHS/FEMA summary of overall exercise conduct and results as evaluated against the requirements of 44 CFR 350.

EMERGENCY PLANNING ZONE (EPZ) DESCRIPTION The D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant is located in the State of Michigan, Berrien County, in the City of Bridgman on the eastern shore of Lake Michigan.

The eastern half of the primary 10-mile EPZ lies entirely within Berrien County. The following jurisdictions are located within the EPZ: Baroda Township, Baroda Village, City of Benton Harbor, Benton Township, City of Bridgman, City of Buchanan, Buchanan Township, Chikaming Township, Lake Township, Lincoln Township, Stevensville, Cronoko Township, Village of Berrien Springs, Royalton Township, City of St. Joseph, St Joseph Township, Village of Shoreham, Sodus Township, and Weesaw Township. The western half of the EPZ extends into Lake Michigan in an approximate 10-mile radius.

Within the 10-mile EPZ, located on the shore of Lake Michigan, are summer resorts offering camping facilities, light housekeeping cottages, tourist attractions, and the Warren Dunes State Park, which has a capacity of 70,000 people during the summer and approximately 10,000 during the off season. The area has a population that varies from season to season. The permanent population is estimated to be over 80,000 people. Seasonal fresh fruit and vegetable farming and processing takes place during the spring, summer, and fall months. A portion of the large seasonal work force is Spanish-speaking. Lake Michigan provides the cooling water source for the plant. Transportation facilities include the CSX Railroad.

7 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

SECTION 1: EXERCISE OVERVIEW 1.1 Exercise Details Exercise Name D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant Type of Exercise Drill Exercise Date July 20, 2011 Program Department of Homeland Security/FEMA Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Scenario Type Radiological Emergency 1.2 Exercise Planning Team Leadership William King Regional Assistance Committee Chairperson DHS/FEMA Region V Technical Hazards Branch Chief 536 South Clark Street Chicago , Illinois, 60605 312-408-5575 william.king2@dhs.gov Dwaine Warren Exercise Director DHS/FEMA Region V Supervisory REP Team Leader 536 South Clark Street 8 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

Chicago, Illinois, 60605 312-408-5342 Dwaine.Warren@dhs.gov Karl Rabenhorst Site Specialist DHS/FEMA Region V Technological Hazards Program Specialist 536 South Clark Street Chicago, Illinois, 60605 312-408-5516 karl.rabenhorst@dhs.gov Mardella Horhn Michigan REP Exercise Coordinator Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Training and Exercise Section, REP Trainer 4000 Collins Road Lansing, Michigan, 48910 517-336-6355 HorhnM@michigan.gov 1.3 Participating Organizations Agencies and organizations of the following jurisdictions participated in the D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant drill:

State Jurisdictions Michigan State Police Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division Michigan Department of Environmental Quality Risk Jurisdictions Berrien County Sheriff's Department Private Organizations Lakeland Community Hospital 9 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

Medic 1 Ambulance Service D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant 10 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

SECTION 2: EXERCISE DESIGN

SUMMARY

2.1 Exercise Purpose and Design On July 20, 2011, the DHS/FEMA Region V Office evaluated a Medical Services (MS-1) Drill for the D.C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant. The purpose of the MS-1 Drill was to assess the capabilities of offsite agencies to respond to a medical emergency involving a potentially radiologically contaminated member of the public. The MS-1 Drill was held in accordance with DHS/FEMA's policies and guidance concerning the exercise of State and local radiological emergency response plans (RERPs).

2.2 Exercise Objectives, Capabilities and Activities Exercise objectives and indentified Capabilities/REP Criteria selected to be demonstrated are discussed in Appendix B "Exercise Plan".

2.3 Scenario Summary Appendix C "Summary and Injects", contains a summary of the Exercise Scenario, a simulated sequence of events that was used as a basis for invoking emergency response actions by Offsite Response Organizations (OROs) in the MS-1 Drill.

During the exercise, controllers from the State of Michigan provided "inject messages" containing scenario events and/or relevant data to those persons or locations who would normally receive notification of such events. These inject messages were the method used for invoking additional specific response actions by OROs.

11 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

SECTION 3: ANALYSIS OF CAPABILITIES 3.1 Drill Evaluation and Results Contained in this section are the results and findings of the evaluation of all jurisdictions and functional entities that participated in the July 20, 2011, Medical Services (MS-1) Drill conducted to test the offsite emergency response capabilities of State and local governments in the EPZ surrounding the D.C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant.

Each jurisdiction and functional entity was evaluated based on its demonstration of exercise criteria delineated in Federal Register Notice: Vol. 67, No. 80, dated April 25, 2002. Detailed information on the exercise criteria and the extent-of-play agreements used in this exercise are found in Appendix B "Exercise Plan" of this report.

3.2 Summary Results of Drill Evaluation The matrix presented in Table 3.1, on the following page(s) presents the status of all exercise criteria from Federal Register Notice Vol 67, No. 80, dated April 25, 2002, which were scheduled for demonstration during this drill by all participating jurisdictions and functional entities. Exercise criteria are listed by number and the demonstration status of those criteria is indicated by the use of the following letters.

12 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

Table 3.1 - Summary of Drill Evaluation DATE: 2011-07-20 SITE: D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, MI M: Met, A: ARCA, D: Deficiency, P: Plan Issue, N: Not Demonstrated MI-Lakeland RMC-MS1T-MDEQ Rep-BER-Lakeland CH-MS1F-Emergency Operations Management Mobilization 1a1 Facilities 1b1 Direction and Control 1c1 Communications Equipment 1d1 M M Equip & Supplies to support operations 1e1 M M Protective Action Decision Making Emergency Worker Exposure Control 2a1 Radiological Assessment and PARs 2b1 Decisions for the Plume Phase - PADs 2b2 PADs for protection of special populations 2c1 Rad Assessment and Decision making for Ingestion Pathway 2d1 Rad Assess/Decision making concerning Relocation, Reentry, and Return 2e1 Protective Action Implementation Implementation of emergency worker exposure control 3a1 M M Implementation of KI decision 3b1 Implementation of protective actions for special populations - EOCs 3c1 Implementation of protective actions for Schools 3c2 Implementation of traffic and access control 3d1 Impediments to evacuation are identified and resolved 3d2 Implementation of ingestion pathway decisions - availability/use of info 3e1 Materials for Ingestion Pathway PADs are available 3e2 Implementation of relocation, re-entry, and return decisions 3f1 Field Measurement and Analysis Adequate Equipment for Plume Phase Field Measurements 4a1 Field Teams obtain sufficient information 4a2 Field Teams Manage Sample Collection Appropriately 4a3 Post plume phase field measurements and sampling 4b1 Laboratory operations 4c1 Emergency Notification and Public Info Activation of the prompt alert and notification system 5a1 Activation of the prompt alert and notification system - Fast Breaker 5a2 Activation of the prompt alert and notification system - Exception areas 5a3 Emergency information and instructions for the public and the media 5b1 Support Operations/Facilities Mon/Decon of evacuees and EWs and registration of evacuees 6a1 Mon/Decon of EW worker equipment 6b1 13 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

Temporary care of evacuees 6c1 Transportation and treatment of contaminated injured individuals 6d1 M M 14 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

a.b.c.d.e.f.g.3.3 Criteria Evaluation Summaries 3.3.1 Michigan Jurisdictions 3.3.1.1 State of Michigan - Lakeland Regional Medical Center - Medical Service -

Transportation - MDEQ Representative The State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality and Medic 1 Ambulance Service demonstrated the Target Capability of Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment through out-of-sequence event at the D.C. Cook Buchanan Office and Lakeland Community Hospital, Niles, Michigan. Demonstrated activities included communications systems, maps, monitoring instruments, dosimetry and potassium iodide sufficient to support emergency operations. The State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality and Medic 1 Ambulance Service personnel demonstrated proper use of personal dosimetry to monitor and control radiation exposure and knew to report to their supervisor if their dosimeters indicated reaching either the administrative and/or maximum exposure limits as prescribed in the Berrien County plans and procedures. Medic 1 Ambulance Service personnel demonstrated proper patient handling, care, and transportation of a potentially contaminated medical patient and medical care took priority over monitoring, decontamination, and contamination control efforts.

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

MET: 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 6.d.1.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None PLAN ISSUES: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 15 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

a.b.c.d.e.f.g.3.3.2 Risk Jurisdictions 3.3.2.1 Berrien County - Lakeland Community Hospital - Medical Service - Facility The State of Michigan, Department of Environmental Quality and Lakeland Community Hospital demonstrated the Target Capability of Emergency Triage and Pre-Hospital Treatment through out-of-sequence event at the Lakeland Community Hospital, Niles, Michigan.

Demonstrated activities included redundant communications systems and effective patient management between the Emergency Department and ambulances. The Radiation Emergency Area (REA) was fully stocked with all appropriate personal protective equipment and dosimetry, radiological survey equipment and contamination control supplies. The Radiation Protection Technicians issued appropriate dosimetry and managed radiological exposure to emergency workers in accordance with the plans and procedures. The Emergency Department and REA staff demonstrated a thorough understanding of radiological contamination control procedures and that life-threatening emergencies always have priority over radioactive contamination concerns.

In summary, the status of DHS/FEMA criteria for this location is as follows:

MET: 1.d.1, 1.e.1, 3.a.1, 6.d.1.

AREAS REQUIRING CORRECTIVE ACTION: None DEFICIENCY: None PLAN ISSUES: None NOT DEMONSTRATED: None PRIOR ISSUES - RESOLVED: None PRIOR ISSUES - UNRESOLVED: None 16 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

SECTION 4: CONCLUSION There were no Deficiencies, ARCAs, or Plan Issues identified for the State of Michigan.

17 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX A: DRILL EVALUATORS AND TEAM LEADERS DATE: 2011-07-20, SITE: D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant, MI LOCATION EVALUATOR AGENCY State of Michigan - Lakeland Regional Medical Center - Medical Service - Transportation - MDEQ Representative

• Karl Rabenhorst DHS/FEMA Berrien County - Lakeland Community Hospital - Medical Service -

Facility*Edward Diaz FEMA* Team Leader 18 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX B: ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Acronym Meaning BP Blood Pressure cpm counts per minute DCCNP DC Cook Nuclear Plant Decon Decontamination DRD Direct Reading Dosimeter EMHSD Emergency Management and Homeland Security Division EMS Emergency Medical Services EMT Emergency Medical Technician EOC Emergency Operations Center EPZ Emergency Planning Zone FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency GCS Glassgow Coma Scale KI Potassium Iodide LCH Lakeland Community Hospital LOC Level of consciousness LPN Licensed Practical Nurse MDEQ Michigan Department of Environmental Quality MDRNE Michigan Depaartment of Natural Resources & Energy (see MDEQ)

MRT Medical Radiation Technican MS-1 Medical Services Drill MSP Michigan State Police NMT Nuclear Medicine Technician NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission ORO Offsite Response Organization OSLD Optically Stimulated Luminecent Dosimeter PRD Permanent Record Dosimeter R Roentgen RAC Regional Assistance Committee REA Radiological Emergency Area REAC/TS Radiation Emergency Assistance Center / Training Site rem Roentgen equivalent man REP Radiological Emergency Preparedness RN Registered Nurse RSO Radiation Safety Officer 19 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

RT Radiation Technician TLD Thermo-Luminecent Dosimeter 20 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

APPENDIX C: EXERCISE PLAN 21 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

22 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

23 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

24 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

25 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

26 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

27 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

28 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

29 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

30 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

31 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

32 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

33 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

34 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________

This page is intentionally blank.

35 Unclassified Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program (REP)

After Action Report/Improvement Plan D.C. Cook Nuclear Plant

_____________________________________________________________________